×
Deadspin | Hawks sign veteran C Tony Bradley  Jan 26, 2026; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Atlanta Hawks forward Onyeka Okongwu (17) and Indiana Pacers center Tony Bradley (13) after the Atlanta Hawks victory over the Indiana Pacers at State Farm Arena. Mandatory Credit: Jordan Godfree-Imagn Images   The Atlanta Hawks announced the signing of veteran center Tony Bradley on Monday. Terms were not disclosed.  Bradley, 28, has played for five NBA teams through eight seasons, most recently the Indiana Pacers.  He averaged 4.0 points, 2.8 rebounds and 10.9 minutes in 38 games (three starts) this season with Indiana.   A first-round pick by the Los Angeles Lakers in 2017, he has career averages of 4.4 points, 3.8 boards and 11.0 minutes in 231 games (21 starts) with the Utah Jazz, Philadelphia 76ers, Oklahoma City Thunder, Chicago Bulls and Pacers. He is a career 62.1% shooter from the field.  The Hawks (45-33) enter Monday’s home game against the New York Knicks in fifth place in the Eastern Conference with four games remaining.  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #Hawks #sign #veteran #Tony #Bradley

Deadspin | Hawks sign veteran C Tony Bradley
Deadspin | Hawks sign veteran C Tony Bradley  Jan 26, 2026; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Atlanta Hawks forward Onyeka Okongwu (17) and Indiana Pacers center Tony Bradley (13) after the Atlanta Hawks victory over the Indiana Pacers at State Farm Arena. Mandatory Credit: Jordan Godfree-Imagn Images   The Atlanta Hawks announced the signing of veteran center Tony Bradley on Monday. Terms were not disclosed.  Bradley, 28, has played for five NBA teams through eight seasons, most recently the Indiana Pacers.  He averaged 4.0 points, 2.8 rebounds and 10.9 minutes in 38 games (three starts) this season with Indiana.   A first-round pick by the Los Angeles Lakers in 2017, he has career averages of 4.4 points, 3.8 boards and 11.0 minutes in 231 games (21 starts) with the Utah Jazz, Philadelphia 76ers, Oklahoma City Thunder, Chicago Bulls and Pacers. He is a career 62.1% shooter from the field.  The Hawks (45-33) enter Monday’s home game against the New York Knicks in fifth place in the Eastern Conference with four games remaining.  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #Hawks #sign #veteran #Tony #BradleyJan 26, 2026; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Atlanta Hawks forward Onyeka Okongwu (17) and Indiana Pacers center Tony Bradley (13) after the Atlanta Hawks victory over the Indiana Pacers at State Farm Arena. Mandatory Credit: Jordan Godfree-Imagn Images

The Atlanta Hawks announced the signing of veteran center Tony Bradley on Monday. Terms were not disclosed.

Bradley, 28, has played for five NBA teams through eight seasons, most recently the Indiana Pacers.


He averaged 4.0 points, 2.8 rebounds and 10.9 minutes in 38 games (three starts) this season with Indiana.

A first-round pick by the Los Angeles Lakers in 2017, he has career averages of 4.4 points, 3.8 boards and 11.0 minutes in 231 games (21 starts) with the Utah Jazz, Philadelphia 76ers, Oklahoma City Thunder, Chicago Bulls and Pacers. He is a career 62.1% shooter from the field.

The Hawks (45-33) enter Monday’s home game against the New York Knicks in fifth place in the Eastern Conference with four games remaining.


–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Hawks #sign #veteran #Tony #Bradley

Jan 26, 2026; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Atlanta Hawks forward Onyeka Okongwu (17) and Indiana Pacers center Tony Bradley (13) after the Atlanta Hawks victory over the Indiana Pacers at State Farm Arena. Mandatory Credit: Jordan Godfree-Imagn Images

The Atlanta Hawks announced the signing of veteran center Tony Bradley on Monday. Terms were not disclosed.

Bradley, 28, has played for five NBA teams through eight seasons, most recently the Indiana Pacers.

He averaged 4.0 points, 2.8 rebounds and 10.9 minutes in 38 games (three starts) this season with Indiana.

A first-round pick by the Los Angeles Lakers in 2017, he has career averages of 4.4 points, 3.8 boards and 11.0 minutes in 231 games (21 starts) with the Utah Jazz, Philadelphia 76ers, Oklahoma City Thunder, Chicago Bulls and Pacers. He is a career 62.1% shooter from the field.

The Hawks (45-33) enter Monday’s home game against the New York Knicks in fifth place in the Eastern Conference with four games remaining.

–Field Level Media

Source link
#Deadspin #Hawks #sign #veteran #Tony #Bradley

All Indian track-and-field athletes will now have to take prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) before signing any sponsorship agreements, the national governing body has announced.

In a circular issued on Thursday, AFI said, “Keeping in mind the best interests of athletes and sponsors, AFI has made it mandatory for athletes to obtain prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India before entering into any agreement or contractual arrangement with any sponsor or third party.”

“Sponsors are also advised to proceed with the execution of any agreement only after confirming with AFI that the athlete has obtained the requisite approval. AFI will send the confirmation within 3 days from the date of the request.”

Athletes now need mandatory federation approval before signing with sponsors, says AFI  All Indian track-and-field athletes will now have to take prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) before signing any sponsorship agreements, the national governing body has announced.In a circular issued on Thursday, AFI said, “Keeping in mind the best interests of athletes and sponsors, AFI has made it mandatory for athletes to obtain prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India before entering into any agreement or contractual arrangement with any sponsor or third party.”“Sponsors are also advised to proceed with the execution of any agreement only after confirming with AFI that the athlete has obtained the requisite approval. AFI will send the confirmation within 3 days from the date of the request.”The circular was addressed to all state units, chief coach Radhakrishnan Nair, Reliance Foundation Youth Sports, JSW Sports, ONGC Sports, Go Sports Foundation, OGQ and any other potential sponsors.AFI ex officio member and World Athletics Vice President Adille Sumariwalla said that this step had to be taken to protect the athletes: “There are agents who keep bringing top athletes to these private organisations. So, for two months, they’re at one top company and after two months, suddenly they have been brought to another top company. We want to ensure that these private organisations are not being influenced by some mafia agents.“These crook agents, some of them are even coaches, are making money on the side and using athletes as a commodity. We have to respect the athletes. There are people who are giving athletes nothing and signing them on. So, we want to ensure that the athletes are not taken for a ride (sic).”Sumariwalla mentioned that the situation had reached a tipping point where the national cause was taking a hit, forcing AFI to intervene. He said, “For them (private sponsors), they are more important than India. It is their organisation first and India comes later. And that, we cannot allow.”ALSO READ | Outside lane, inside history: M. D. Valsamma and the race that changed Indian athleticsWithout revealing names, the former AFI President gave an example of how, in the past, athletes have lost out on getting the appropriate financial assistance. “I don’t want to get into details but a junior world champion (Neeraj Chopra – men’s javelin throw – and Hima Das – women’s 400m – are the only two Indians who have been junior world champions) was paid a stipend of 15,000 a month, which we did not know. We would have never let them sign it. They would have paid 1.5 lakhs a month but the poor athlete did not know,” said the 68-year-old.The circular mentions that the approval process will take three days but Sumariwalla pointed out that a long contract will require time with the decision-making process involving all stakeholders. “We will try to approve it as fast as possible but if you send me a 30-page contract and I find that things are not okay, then it’s very simple for me to say no but that’s not what we want. Then, we’ll have to call them in for a conversation,” he said.He also debunked the myth that the time taken by the approval process could cost the athlete a potential deal as the sponsors may back out. “No athlete is going to be sponsored by a private party who does not have employment with railways or police or services or somewhere. That’s the first point of entry,” he opined.Welcoming the move, Rahul Trehan, Chief Operating Officer at IOS Sports & Entertainment, said, “In certain cases, the agreements are not balanced. Athletes don’t have the termination clause but the agencies do. So, if the governing body of that particular sport is doing this to maintain a balance between the athlete and (the sponsors) and to oversee the things, it is fine.”However, Manisha Malhotra, the president of Inspire Institute of Sport (a high performance training centre run by JSW Sports), argued that athletes should have the right to make the decision about what’s right for them. She said, “I don’t agree with federations trying to control athletes. Those days are far gone. Athletes should be allowed to make choices out of their own free will.“A federation can definitely advise an athlete of what they think is better for them or not but to dictate terms, I don’t fully agree with that whole thing but it is what it is. The flip side of that is that athletes are taking the system for a ride and maybe they’re trying to govern it in that way. So, there’s merit on both accounts. We’ll see whether eventually it’s beneficial to sport or not.”On AFI’s decision to be involved in such a capacity in a sponsorship agreement between a private entity and an athlete, Malhotra pointed out that federations in nations with good sporting ecosystems provide a pathway for assistance but not the final approval. “In most other countries where the governance is good, most sponsorship comes through the sports federation. So, while it’s not a direct approval, the sports federations or the Olympic committees are the ones vetting out different sorts of grants.“I don’t think it’s happening in the western countries for sure where you need to ask the permission of a federation if someone can support you.”Published on Apr 04, 2026  #Athletes #mandatory #federation #approval #signing #sponsors #AFI

The circular was addressed to all state units, chief coach Radhakrishnan Nair, Reliance Foundation Youth Sports, JSW Sports, ONGC Sports, Go Sports Foundation, OGQ and any other potential sponsors.

AFI ex officio member and World Athletics Vice President Adille Sumariwalla said that this step had to be taken to protect the athletes: “There are agents who keep bringing top athletes to these private organisations. So, for two months, they’re at one top company and after two months, suddenly they have been brought to another top company. We want to ensure that these private organisations are not being influenced by some mafia agents.

“These crook agents, some of them are even coaches, are making money on the side and using athletes as a commodity. We have to respect the athletes. There are people who are giving athletes nothing and signing them on. So, we want to ensure that the athletes are not taken for a ride (sic).”

Sumariwalla mentioned that the situation had reached a tipping point where the national cause was taking a hit, forcing AFI to intervene. He said, “For them (private sponsors), they are more important than India. It is their organisation first and India comes later. And that, we cannot allow.”

ALSO READ | Outside lane, inside history: M. D. Valsamma and the race that changed Indian athletics

Without revealing names, the former AFI President gave an example of how, in the past, athletes have lost out on getting the appropriate financial assistance. “I don’t want to get into details but a junior world champion (Neeraj Chopra – men’s javelin throw – and Hima Das – women’s 400m – are the only two Indians who have been junior world champions) was paid a stipend of 15,000 a month, which we did not know. We would have never let them sign it. They would have paid 1.5 lakhs a month but the poor athlete did not know,” said the 68-year-old.

The circular mentions that the approval process will take three days but Sumariwalla pointed out that a long contract will require time with the decision-making process involving all stakeholders. “We will try to approve it as fast as possible but if you send me a 30-page contract and I find that things are not okay, then it’s very simple for me to say no but that’s not what we want. Then, we’ll have to call them in for a conversation,” he said.

He also debunked the myth that the time taken by the approval process could cost the athlete a potential deal as the sponsors may back out. “No athlete is going to be sponsored by a private party who does not have employment with railways or police or services or somewhere. That’s the first point of entry,” he opined.

Welcoming the move, Rahul Trehan, Chief Operating Officer at IOS Sports & Entertainment, said, “In certain cases, the agreements are not balanced. Athletes don’t have the termination clause but the agencies do. So, if the governing body of that particular sport is doing this to maintain a balance between the athlete and (the sponsors) and to oversee the things, it is fine.”

However, Manisha Malhotra, the president of Inspire Institute of Sport (a high performance training centre run by JSW Sports), argued that athletes should have the right to make the decision about what’s right for them. She said, “I don’t agree with federations trying to control athletes. Those days are far gone. Athletes should be allowed to make choices out of their own free will.

“A federation can definitely advise an athlete of what they think is better for them or not but to dictate terms, I don’t fully agree with that whole thing but it is what it is. The flip side of that is that athletes are taking the system for a ride and maybe they’re trying to govern it in that way. So, there’s merit on both accounts. We’ll see whether eventually it’s beneficial to sport or not.”

On AFI’s decision to be involved in such a capacity in a sponsorship agreement between a private entity and an athlete, Malhotra pointed out that federations in nations with good sporting ecosystems provide a pathway for assistance but not the final approval. “In most other countries where the governance is good, most sponsorship comes through the sports federation. So, while it’s not a direct approval, the sports federations or the Olympic committees are the ones vetting out different sorts of grants.

“I don’t think it’s happening in the western countries for sure where you need to ask the permission of a federation if someone can support you.”

Published on Apr 04, 2026

#Athletes #mandatory #federation #approval #signing #sponsors #AFI">Athletes now need mandatory federation approval before signing with sponsors, says AFI  All Indian track-and-field athletes will now have to take prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) before signing any sponsorship agreements, the national governing body has announced.In a circular issued on Thursday, AFI said, “Keeping in mind the best interests of athletes and sponsors, AFI has made it mandatory for athletes to obtain prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India before entering into any agreement or contractual arrangement with any sponsor or third party.”“Sponsors are also advised to proceed with the execution of any agreement only after confirming with AFI that the athlete has obtained the requisite approval. AFI will send the confirmation within 3 days from the date of the request.”The circular was addressed to all state units, chief coach Radhakrishnan Nair, Reliance Foundation Youth Sports, JSW Sports, ONGC Sports, Go Sports Foundation, OGQ and any other potential sponsors.AFI ex officio member and World Athletics Vice President Adille Sumariwalla said that this step had to be taken to protect the athletes: “There are agents who keep bringing top athletes to these private organisations. So, for two months, they’re at one top company and after two months, suddenly they have been brought to another top company. We want to ensure that these private organisations are not being influenced by some mafia agents.“These crook agents, some of them are even coaches, are making money on the side and using athletes as a commodity. We have to respect the athletes. There are people who are giving athletes nothing and signing them on. So, we want to ensure that the athletes are not taken for a ride (sic).”Sumariwalla mentioned that the situation had reached a tipping point where the national cause was taking a hit, forcing AFI to intervene. He said, “For them (private sponsors), they are more important than India. It is their organisation first and India comes later. And that, we cannot allow.”ALSO READ | Outside lane, inside history: M. D. Valsamma and the race that changed Indian athleticsWithout revealing names, the former AFI President gave an example of how, in the past, athletes have lost out on getting the appropriate financial assistance. “I don’t want to get into details but a junior world champion (Neeraj Chopra – men’s javelin throw – and Hima Das – women’s 400m – are the only two Indians who have been junior world champions) was paid a stipend of 15,000 a month, which we did not know. We would have never let them sign it. They would have paid 1.5 lakhs a month but the poor athlete did not know,” said the 68-year-old.The circular mentions that the approval process will take three days but Sumariwalla pointed out that a long contract will require time with the decision-making process involving all stakeholders. “We will try to approve it as fast as possible but if you send me a 30-page contract and I find that things are not okay, then it’s very simple for me to say no but that’s not what we want. Then, we’ll have to call them in for a conversation,” he said.He also debunked the myth that the time taken by the approval process could cost the athlete a potential deal as the sponsors may back out. “No athlete is going to be sponsored by a private party who does not have employment with railways or police or services or somewhere. That’s the first point of entry,” he opined.Welcoming the move, Rahul Trehan, Chief Operating Officer at IOS Sports & Entertainment, said, “In certain cases, the agreements are not balanced. Athletes don’t have the termination clause but the agencies do. So, if the governing body of that particular sport is doing this to maintain a balance between the athlete and (the sponsors) and to oversee the things, it is fine.”However, Manisha Malhotra, the president of Inspire Institute of Sport (a high performance training centre run by JSW Sports), argued that athletes should have the right to make the decision about what’s right for them. She said, “I don’t agree with federations trying to control athletes. Those days are far gone. Athletes should be allowed to make choices out of their own free will.“A federation can definitely advise an athlete of what they think is better for them or not but to dictate terms, I don’t fully agree with that whole thing but it is what it is. The flip side of that is that athletes are taking the system for a ride and maybe they’re trying to govern it in that way. So, there’s merit on both accounts. We’ll see whether eventually it’s beneficial to sport or not.”On AFI’s decision to be involved in such a capacity in a sponsorship agreement between a private entity and an athlete, Malhotra pointed out that federations in nations with good sporting ecosystems provide a pathway for assistance but not the final approval. “In most other countries where the governance is good, most sponsorship comes through the sports federation. So, while it’s not a direct approval, the sports federations or the Olympic committees are the ones vetting out different sorts of grants.“I don’t think it’s happening in the western countries for sure where you need to ask the permission of a federation if someone can support you.”Published on Apr 04, 2026  #Athletes #mandatory #federation #approval #signing #sponsors #AFI

Outside lane, inside history: M. D. Valsamma and the race that changed Indian athletics

Without revealing names, the former AFI President gave an example of how, in the past, athletes have lost out on getting the appropriate financial assistance. “I don’t want to get into details but a junior world champion (Neeraj Chopra – men’s javelin throw – and Hima Das – women’s 400m – are the only two Indians who have been junior world champions) was paid a stipend of 15,000 a month, which we did not know. We would have never let them sign it. They would have paid 1.5 lakhs a month but the poor athlete did not know,” said the 68-year-old.

The circular mentions that the approval process will take three days but Sumariwalla pointed out that a long contract will require time with the decision-making process involving all stakeholders. “We will try to approve it as fast as possible but if you send me a 30-page contract and I find that things are not okay, then it’s very simple for me to say no but that’s not what we want. Then, we’ll have to call them in for a conversation,” he said.

He also debunked the myth that the time taken by the approval process could cost the athlete a potential deal as the sponsors may back out. “No athlete is going to be sponsored by a private party who does not have employment with railways or police or services or somewhere. That’s the first point of entry,” he opined.

Welcoming the move, Rahul Trehan, Chief Operating Officer at IOS Sports & Entertainment, said, “In certain cases, the agreements are not balanced. Athletes don’t have the termination clause but the agencies do. So, if the governing body of that particular sport is doing this to maintain a balance between the athlete and (the sponsors) and to oversee the things, it is fine.”

However, Manisha Malhotra, the president of Inspire Institute of Sport (a high performance training centre run by JSW Sports), argued that athletes should have the right to make the decision about what’s right for them. She said, “I don’t agree with federations trying to control athletes. Those days are far gone. Athletes should be allowed to make choices out of their own free will.

“A federation can definitely advise an athlete of what they think is better for them or not but to dictate terms, I don’t fully agree with that whole thing but it is what it is. The flip side of that is that athletes are taking the system for a ride and maybe they’re trying to govern it in that way. So, there’s merit on both accounts. We’ll see whether eventually it’s beneficial to sport or not.”

On AFI’s decision to be involved in such a capacity in a sponsorship agreement between a private entity and an athlete, Malhotra pointed out that federations in nations with good sporting ecosystems provide a pathway for assistance but not the final approval. “In most other countries where the governance is good, most sponsorship comes through the sports federation. So, while it’s not a direct approval, the sports federations or the Olympic committees are the ones vetting out different sorts of grants.

“I don’t think it’s happening in the western countries for sure where you need to ask the permission of a federation if someone can support you.”

Published on Apr 04, 2026

#Athletes #mandatory #federation #approval #signing #sponsors #AFI">Athletes now need mandatory federation approval before signing with sponsors, says AFI

All Indian track-and-field athletes will now have to take prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) before signing any sponsorship agreements, the national governing body has announced.

In a circular issued on Thursday, AFI said, “Keeping in mind the best interests of athletes and sponsors, AFI has made it mandatory for athletes to obtain prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India before entering into any agreement or contractual arrangement with any sponsor or third party.”

“Sponsors are also advised to proceed with the execution of any agreement only after confirming with AFI that the athlete has obtained the requisite approval. AFI will send the confirmation within 3 days from the date of the request.”

Athletes now need mandatory federation approval before signing with sponsors, says AFI  All Indian track-and-field athletes will now have to take prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) before signing any sponsorship agreements, the national governing body has announced.In a circular issued on Thursday, AFI said, “Keeping in mind the best interests of athletes and sponsors, AFI has made it mandatory for athletes to obtain prior approval from the Athletics Federation of India before entering into any agreement or contractual arrangement with any sponsor or third party.”“Sponsors are also advised to proceed with the execution of any agreement only after confirming with AFI that the athlete has obtained the requisite approval. AFI will send the confirmation within 3 days from the date of the request.”The circular was addressed to all state units, chief coach Radhakrishnan Nair, Reliance Foundation Youth Sports, JSW Sports, ONGC Sports, Go Sports Foundation, OGQ and any other potential sponsors.AFI ex officio member and World Athletics Vice President Adille Sumariwalla said that this step had to be taken to protect the athletes: “There are agents who keep bringing top athletes to these private organisations. So, for two months, they’re at one top company and after two months, suddenly they have been brought to another top company. We want to ensure that these private organisations are not being influenced by some mafia agents.“These crook agents, some of them are even coaches, are making money on the side and using athletes as a commodity. We have to respect the athletes. There are people who are giving athletes nothing and signing them on. So, we want to ensure that the athletes are not taken for a ride (sic).”Sumariwalla mentioned that the situation had reached a tipping point where the national cause was taking a hit, forcing AFI to intervene. He said, “For them (private sponsors), they are more important than India. It is their organisation first and India comes later. And that, we cannot allow.”ALSO READ | Outside lane, inside history: M. D. Valsamma and the race that changed Indian athleticsWithout revealing names, the former AFI President gave an example of how, in the past, athletes have lost out on getting the appropriate financial assistance. “I don’t want to get into details but a junior world champion (Neeraj Chopra – men’s javelin throw – and Hima Das – women’s 400m – are the only two Indians who have been junior world champions) was paid a stipend of 15,000 a month, which we did not know. We would have never let them sign it. They would have paid 1.5 lakhs a month but the poor athlete did not know,” said the 68-year-old.The circular mentions that the approval process will take three days but Sumariwalla pointed out that a long contract will require time with the decision-making process involving all stakeholders. “We will try to approve it as fast as possible but if you send me a 30-page contract and I find that things are not okay, then it’s very simple for me to say no but that’s not what we want. Then, we’ll have to call them in for a conversation,” he said.He also debunked the myth that the time taken by the approval process could cost the athlete a potential deal as the sponsors may back out. “No athlete is going to be sponsored by a private party who does not have employment with railways or police or services or somewhere. That’s the first point of entry,” he opined.Welcoming the move, Rahul Trehan, Chief Operating Officer at IOS Sports & Entertainment, said, “In certain cases, the agreements are not balanced. Athletes don’t have the termination clause but the agencies do. So, if the governing body of that particular sport is doing this to maintain a balance between the athlete and (the sponsors) and to oversee the things, it is fine.”However, Manisha Malhotra, the president of Inspire Institute of Sport (a high performance training centre run by JSW Sports), argued that athletes should have the right to make the decision about what’s right for them. She said, “I don’t agree with federations trying to control athletes. Those days are far gone. Athletes should be allowed to make choices out of their own free will.“A federation can definitely advise an athlete of what they think is better for them or not but to dictate terms, I don’t fully agree with that whole thing but it is what it is. The flip side of that is that athletes are taking the system for a ride and maybe they’re trying to govern it in that way. So, there’s merit on both accounts. We’ll see whether eventually it’s beneficial to sport or not.”On AFI’s decision to be involved in such a capacity in a sponsorship agreement between a private entity and an athlete, Malhotra pointed out that federations in nations with good sporting ecosystems provide a pathway for assistance but not the final approval. “In most other countries where the governance is good, most sponsorship comes through the sports federation. So, while it’s not a direct approval, the sports federations or the Olympic committees are the ones vetting out different sorts of grants.“I don’t think it’s happening in the western countries for sure where you need to ask the permission of a federation if someone can support you.”Published on Apr 04, 2026  #Athletes #mandatory #federation #approval #signing #sponsors #AFI

The circular was addressed to all state units, chief coach Radhakrishnan Nair, Reliance Foundation Youth Sports, JSW Sports, ONGC Sports, Go Sports Foundation, OGQ and any other potential sponsors.

AFI ex officio member and World Athletics Vice President Adille Sumariwalla said that this step had to be taken to protect the athletes: “There are agents who keep bringing top athletes to these private organisations. So, for two months, they’re at one top company and after two months, suddenly they have been brought to another top company. We want to ensure that these private organisations are not being influenced by some mafia agents.

“These crook agents, some of them are even coaches, are making money on the side and using athletes as a commodity. We have to respect the athletes. There are people who are giving athletes nothing and signing them on. So, we want to ensure that the athletes are not taken for a ride (sic).”

Sumariwalla mentioned that the situation had reached a tipping point where the national cause was taking a hit, forcing AFI to intervene. He said, “For them (private sponsors), they are more important than India. It is their organisation first and India comes later. And that, we cannot allow.”

ALSO READ | Outside lane, inside history: M. D. Valsamma and the race that changed Indian athletics

Without revealing names, the former AFI President gave an example of how, in the past, athletes have lost out on getting the appropriate financial assistance. “I don’t want to get into details but a junior world champion (Neeraj Chopra – men’s javelin throw – and Hima Das – women’s 400m – are the only two Indians who have been junior world champions) was paid a stipend of 15,000 a month, which we did not know. We would have never let them sign it. They would have paid 1.5 lakhs a month but the poor athlete did not know,” said the 68-year-old.

The circular mentions that the approval process will take three days but Sumariwalla pointed out that a long contract will require time with the decision-making process involving all stakeholders. “We will try to approve it as fast as possible but if you send me a 30-page contract and I find that things are not okay, then it’s very simple for me to say no but that’s not what we want. Then, we’ll have to call them in for a conversation,” he said.

He also debunked the myth that the time taken by the approval process could cost the athlete a potential deal as the sponsors may back out. “No athlete is going to be sponsored by a private party who does not have employment with railways or police or services or somewhere. That’s the first point of entry,” he opined.

Welcoming the move, Rahul Trehan, Chief Operating Officer at IOS Sports & Entertainment, said, “In certain cases, the agreements are not balanced. Athletes don’t have the termination clause but the agencies do. So, if the governing body of that particular sport is doing this to maintain a balance between the athlete and (the sponsors) and to oversee the things, it is fine.”

However, Manisha Malhotra, the president of Inspire Institute of Sport (a high performance training centre run by JSW Sports), argued that athletes should have the right to make the decision about what’s right for them. She said, “I don’t agree with federations trying to control athletes. Those days are far gone. Athletes should be allowed to make choices out of their own free will.

“A federation can definitely advise an athlete of what they think is better for them or not but to dictate terms, I don’t fully agree with that whole thing but it is what it is. The flip side of that is that athletes are taking the system for a ride and maybe they’re trying to govern it in that way. So, there’s merit on both accounts. We’ll see whether eventually it’s beneficial to sport or not.”

On AFI’s decision to be involved in such a capacity in a sponsorship agreement between a private entity and an athlete, Malhotra pointed out that federations in nations with good sporting ecosystems provide a pathway for assistance but not the final approval. “In most other countries where the governance is good, most sponsorship comes through the sports federation. So, while it’s not a direct approval, the sports federations or the Olympic committees are the ones vetting out different sorts of grants.

“I don’t think it’s happening in the western countries for sure where you need to ask the permission of a federation if someone can support you.”

Published on Apr 04, 2026

#Athletes #mandatory #federation #approval #signing #sponsors #AFI

As we enter the and-1 final week of the NBA regular season, there’s still much to be decided.

It’s just not what we’re being led to believe.

The promos say …

  • The Thunder and Spurs will duel to the finish to determine the top seed in the West.

Not true: Even though they would lose a tie-breaker, Oklahoma City, with the Jazz, a crippled Lakers team and a struggling Clippers squad as its next three opponents, has this thing wrapped up. Put them on TV next Sunday and you’re likely to get a whole lot of Brooks Barnhizer.

  • The Lakers, Nuggets and Rockets will do everything they can to avoid finishing fifth in the West.

Not true: While the third- and fourth-place teams will earn home-court advantage in the first round, these squads – along with No. 6 Minnesota – are so evenly matched, the site really shouldn’t matter. Big picture, the third-place team – if it can survive the Timberwolves – then gets the Spurs in Round 2 … and who wants that?

  • The Cavaliers can benefit from passing the Knicks for third in the East.

Not true: The third seed – after a tough first-round matchup – would get the red-hot Celtics in Round 2. It says here: You’re better off landing fourth, where you possibly luck into Atlanta in the first round, then get the Pistons in the Eastern semifinals.

  • The scramble for play-in spots in both conferences is wide-open.

Actually, this is true: But all are glorified lottery teams that will be nothing more than cannon fodder for the Thunder, Spurs, Pistons and Celtics in Round 1. So who cares?

In other words, there isn’t a single must-watch matchup on the docket next Sunday, when the NBA has clumped all its games into two TV windows, hoping to double-dip on meaningful stuff.

So, you might be asking, what then is left to get excited about?

The NBA’s major awards are all up for grabs, with one signature performance – especially as a lasting impression in the regular-season finale – quite possibly making the difference.

Unfortunately, the NBA’s silly 65-game rule has already dampened the enthusiasm on what should be considered major accomplishments.

So instead of simply looking at the candidates for the two most glamorous awards, let’s examine how shifting importance to total points – not total games – could have resulted in a fantastic finish and multiple must-see matchups in Game 82.

2026 NBA MVP

Sadly, one of the toughest decisions in recent hardware history is being caught up in: Will Nikola Jokic and Victor Wembanyama make it to 65 games? It didn’t have to be this way.

If the NBA simply would switch over to totals rather than averages in citing statistical leaders – you know, like baseball and football do in basically every category – it would demonstrate the importance of showing up without disqualifying anybody.

It’s interesting to note that Luka Doncic leads the NBA in scoring. But since he’s injured and done for the regular season, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, just 91 points behind with five games left, has a great opportunity to seize the league’s most prestigious statistical crown.

That has to be worth something. As does the Thunder’s best record in the league and SGA’s likely spot on an NBA All-Defense team.

Jokic will win the assists title, but all those games he’s missed have cost him on the rebounds (fourth place) and scoring (10th) lists. Those aren’t MVP-level achievements.

And then there’s Wemby. He’ll be the blocks king, but he’s even farther behind in rebounds (fifth) and scoring (18th).

Total points – coupled with Defensive Player of the Year consideration and the most overachieving of the elite teams – point out why Jaylen Brown, currently third in scoring, is actually a better candidate than the two big men.

If SGA, who played his 65th game Thursday, were to take a game off this week, the door would be open for Brown, already with a 50-point game to his credit, to go nuts in the finale against the Magic and steal the scoring crown George Gervin-style.

I’d tune in for that … and maybe later on when SGA would be forced to counter-punch in an otherwise unwatchable pre-playoff exhibition against the Suns.

My pick: Gilgeous-Alexander.

Rookie of the Year

Here’s where the focus on the 65-game qualification is likely to produce the wrong winner.

Cooper Flagg reached 65 with a record-setting, 51-point explosion Friday against the Mavericks. Some believe that clinched the award.

But reaching this so-called magic number is only serving to detract from the fact that college teammate Kon Knueppel has had a better – and certainly more complete – season. He’s shown up WAY more often (77 games) and has helped lead a surprisingly entertaining team (the Hornets) rather than compiling big numbers for a bad club (Flagg’s Mavericks) that hasn’t scored a meaningful point all season.

Most importantly, unless things go completely sideways in the final week, Knueppel will win the rookie scoring title. He begins play Sunday with a 101-point lead, while only trailing Flagg by insignificant amounts in rebounds and assists.

The problem is: Knueppel couldn’t possibly have to deal with a harsher gauntlet than what’s in front of him – the Timberwolves, Celtics, Pistons and Knicks, all defensive stalwarts.

A couple more Flagg 40’s could make the finale – against a defenseless team already in fishing gear (the Bulls) – potentially historic.

Again I say: I’d tune in both early (Hornets-Knicks) and late (Bulls-Mavericks).

My pick: Knueppel.

#Debunking #NBA #Playoff #Narratives #Breaking #Award #Races #Deadspin.com">Debunking NBA Playoff Narratives and Breaking Down Award Races | Deadspin.com   As we enter the and-1 final week of the NBA regular season, there’s still much to be decided.It’s just not what we’re being led to believe.The promos say …The Thunder and Spurs will duel to the finish to determine the top seed in the West.Not true: Even though they would lose a tie-breaker, Oklahoma City, with the Jazz, a crippled Lakers team and a struggling Clippers squad as its next three opponents, has this thing wrapped up. Put them on TV next Sunday and you’re likely to get a whole lot of Brooks Barnhizer.The Lakers, Nuggets and Rockets will do everything they can to avoid finishing fifth in the West.Not true: While the third- and fourth-place teams will earn home-court advantage in the first round, these squads – along with No. 6 Minnesota – are so evenly matched, the site really shouldn’t matter. Big picture, the third-place team – if it can survive the Timberwolves – then gets the Spurs in Round 2 … and who wants that?The Cavaliers can benefit from passing the Knicks for third in the East.Not true: The third seed – after a tough first-round matchup – would get the red-hot Celtics in Round 2. It says here: You’re better off landing fourth, where you possibly luck into Atlanta in the first round, then get the Pistons in the Eastern semifinals.The scramble for play-in spots in both conferences is wide-open.Actually, this is true: But all are glorified lottery teams that will be nothing more than cannon fodder for the Thunder, Spurs, Pistons and Celtics in Round 1. So who cares?In other words, there isn’t a single must-watch matchup on the docket next Sunday, when the NBA has clumped all its games into two TV windows, hoping to double-dip on meaningful stuff.So, you might be asking, what then is left to get excited about?The NBA’s major awards are all up for grabs, with one signature performance – especially as a lasting impression in the regular-season finale – quite possibly making the difference.Unfortunately, the NBA’s silly 65-game rule has already dampened the enthusiasm on what should be considered major accomplishments.So instead of simply looking at the candidates for the two most glamorous awards, let’s examine how shifting importance to total points – not total games – could have resulted in a fantastic finish and multiple must-see matchups in Game 82.2026 NBA MVPSadly, one of the toughest decisions in recent hardware history is being caught up in: Will Nikola Jokic and Victor Wembanyama make it to 65 games? It didn’t have to be this way.If the NBA simply would switch over to totals rather than averages in citing statistical leaders – you know, like baseball and football do in basically every category – it would demonstrate the importance of showing up without disqualifying anybody.It’s interesting to note that Luka Doncic leads the NBA in scoring. But since he’s injured and done for the regular season, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, just 91 points behind with five games left, has a great opportunity to seize the league’s most prestigious statistical crown.That has to be worth something. As does the Thunder’s best record in the league and SGA’s likely spot on an NBA All-Defense team.Jokic will win the assists title, but all those games he’s missed have cost him on the rebounds (fourth place) and scoring (10th) lists. Those aren’t MVP-level achievements.And then there’s Wemby. He’ll be the blocks king, but he’s even farther behind in rebounds (fifth) and scoring (18th).Total points – coupled with Defensive Player of the Year consideration and the most overachieving of the elite teams – point out why Jaylen Brown, currently third in scoring, is actually a better candidate than the two big men.If SGA, who played his 65th game Thursday, were to take a game off this week, the door would be open for Brown, already with a 50-point game to his credit, to go nuts in the finale against the Magic and steal the scoring crown George Gervin-style.I’d tune in for that … and maybe later on when SGA would be forced to counter-punch in an otherwise unwatchable pre-playoff exhibition against the Suns.My pick: Gilgeous-Alexander.Rookie of the YearHere’s where the focus on the 65-game qualification is likely to produce the wrong winner.Cooper Flagg reached 65 with a record-setting, 51-point explosion Friday against the Mavericks. Some believe that clinched the award.But reaching this so-called magic number is only serving to detract from the fact that college teammate Kon Knueppel has had a better – and certainly more complete – season. He’s shown up WAY more often (77 games) and has helped lead a surprisingly entertaining team (the Hornets) rather than compiling big numbers for a bad club (Flagg’s Mavericks) that hasn’t scored a meaningful point all season.Most importantly, unless things go completely sideways in the final week, Knueppel will win the rookie scoring title. He begins play Sunday with a 101-point lead, while only trailing Flagg by insignificant amounts in rebounds and assists.The problem is: Knueppel couldn’t possibly have to deal with a harsher gauntlet than what’s in front of him – the Timberwolves, Celtics, Pistons and Knicks, all defensive stalwarts.A couple more Flagg 40’s could make the finale – against a defenseless team already in fishing gear (the Bulls) – potentially historic.Again I say: I’d tune in both early (Hornets-Knicks) and late (Bulls-Mavericks).My pick: Knueppel.   #Debunking #NBA #Playoff #Narratives #Breaking #Award #Races #Deadspin.com

a crippled Lakers team and a struggling Clippers squad as its next three opponents, has this thing wrapped up. Put them on TV next Sunday and you’re likely to get a whole lot of Brooks Barnhizer.

  • The Lakers, Nuggets and Rockets will do everything they can to avoid finishing fifth in the West.

Not true: While the third- and fourth-place teams will earn home-court advantage in the first round, these squads – along with No. 6 Minnesota – are so evenly matched, the site really shouldn’t matter. Big picture, the third-place team – if it can survive the Timberwolves – then gets the Spurs in Round 2 … and who wants that?

  • The Cavaliers can benefit from passing the Knicks for third in the East.

Not true: The third seed – after a tough first-round matchup – would get the red-hot Celtics in Round 2. It says here: You’re better off landing fourth, where you possibly luck into Atlanta in the first round, then get the Pistons in the Eastern semifinals.

  • The scramble for play-in spots in both conferences is wide-open.

Actually, this is true: But all are glorified lottery teams that will be nothing more than cannon fodder for the Thunder, Spurs, Pistons and Celtics in Round 1. So who cares?

In other words, there isn’t a single must-watch matchup on the docket next Sunday, when the NBA has clumped all its games into two TV windows, hoping to double-dip on meaningful stuff.

So, you might be asking, what then is left to get excited about?

The NBA’s major awards are all up for grabs, with one signature performance – especially as a lasting impression in the regular-season finale – quite possibly making the difference.

Unfortunately, the NBA’s silly 65-game rule has already dampened the enthusiasm on what should be considered major accomplishments.

So instead of simply looking at the candidates for the two most glamorous awards, let’s examine how shifting importance to total points – not total games – could have resulted in a fantastic finish and multiple must-see matchups in Game 82.

2026 NBA MVP

Sadly, one of the toughest decisions in recent hardware history is being caught up in: Will Nikola Jokic and Victor Wembanyama make it to 65 games? It didn’t have to be this way.

If the NBA simply would switch over to totals rather than averages in citing statistical leaders – you know, like baseball and football do in basically every category – it would demonstrate the importance of showing up without disqualifying anybody.

It’s interesting to note that Luka Doncic leads the NBA in scoring. But since he’s injured and done for the regular season, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, just 91 points behind with five games left, has a great opportunity to seize the league’s most prestigious statistical crown.

That has to be worth something. As does the Thunder’s best record in the league and SGA’s likely spot on an NBA All-Defense team.

Jokic will win the assists title, but all those games he’s missed have cost him on the rebounds (fourth place) and scoring (10th) lists. Those aren’t MVP-level achievements.

And then there’s Wemby. He’ll be the blocks king, but he’s even farther behind in rebounds (fifth) and scoring (18th).

Total points – coupled with Defensive Player of the Year consideration and the most overachieving of the elite teams – point out why Jaylen Brown, currently third in scoring, is actually a better candidate than the two big men.

If SGA, who played his 65th game Thursday, were to take a game off this week, the door would be open for Brown, already with a 50-point game to his credit, to go nuts in the finale against the Magic and steal the scoring crown George Gervin-style.

I’d tune in for that … and maybe later on when SGA would be forced to counter-punch in an otherwise unwatchable pre-playoff exhibition against the Suns.

My pick: Gilgeous-Alexander.

Rookie of the Year

Here’s where the focus on the 65-game qualification is likely to produce the wrong winner.

Cooper Flagg reached 65 with a record-setting, 51-point explosion Friday against the Mavericks. Some believe that clinched the award.

But reaching this so-called magic number is only serving to detract from the fact that college teammate Kon Knueppel has had a better – and certainly more complete – season. He’s shown up WAY more often (77 games) and has helped lead a surprisingly entertaining team (the Hornets) rather than compiling big numbers for a bad club (Flagg’s Mavericks) that hasn’t scored a meaningful point all season.

Most importantly, unless things go completely sideways in the final week, Knueppel will win the rookie scoring title. He begins play Sunday with a 101-point lead, while only trailing Flagg by insignificant amounts in rebounds and assists.

The problem is: Knueppel couldn’t possibly have to deal with a harsher gauntlet than what’s in front of him – the Timberwolves, Celtics, Pistons and Knicks, all defensive stalwarts.

A couple more Flagg 40’s could make the finale – against a defenseless team already in fishing gear (the Bulls) – potentially historic.

Again I say: I’d tune in both early (Hornets-Knicks) and late (Bulls-Mavericks).

My pick: Knueppel.

#Debunking #NBA #Playoff #Narratives #Breaking #Award #Races #Deadspin.com">Debunking NBA Playoff Narratives and Breaking Down Award Races | Deadspin.com

As we enter the and-1 final week of the NBA regular season, there’s still much to be decided.

It’s just not what we’re being led to believe.

The promos say …

  • The Thunder and Spurs will duel to the finish to determine the top seed in the West.

Not true: Even though they would lose a tie-breaker, Oklahoma City, with the Jazz, a crippled Lakers team and a struggling Clippers squad as its next three opponents, has this thing wrapped up. Put them on TV next Sunday and you’re likely to get a whole lot of Brooks Barnhizer.

  • The Lakers, Nuggets and Rockets will do everything they can to avoid finishing fifth in the West.

Not true: While the third- and fourth-place teams will earn home-court advantage in the first round, these squads – along with No. 6 Minnesota – are so evenly matched, the site really shouldn’t matter. Big picture, the third-place team – if it can survive the Timberwolves – then gets the Spurs in Round 2 … and who wants that?

  • The Cavaliers can benefit from passing the Knicks for third in the East.

Not true: The third seed – after a tough first-round matchup – would get the red-hot Celtics in Round 2. It says here: You’re better off landing fourth, where you possibly luck into Atlanta in the first round, then get the Pistons in the Eastern semifinals.

  • The scramble for play-in spots in both conferences is wide-open.

Actually, this is true: But all are glorified lottery teams that will be nothing more than cannon fodder for the Thunder, Spurs, Pistons and Celtics in Round 1. So who cares?

In other words, there isn’t a single must-watch matchup on the docket next Sunday, when the NBA has clumped all its games into two TV windows, hoping to double-dip on meaningful stuff.

So, you might be asking, what then is left to get excited about?

The NBA’s major awards are all up for grabs, with one signature performance – especially as a lasting impression in the regular-season finale – quite possibly making the difference.

Unfortunately, the NBA’s silly 65-game rule has already dampened the enthusiasm on what should be considered major accomplishments.

So instead of simply looking at the candidates for the two most glamorous awards, let’s examine how shifting importance to total points – not total games – could have resulted in a fantastic finish and multiple must-see matchups in Game 82.

2026 NBA MVP

Sadly, one of the toughest decisions in recent hardware history is being caught up in: Will Nikola Jokic and Victor Wembanyama make it to 65 games? It didn’t have to be this way.

If the NBA simply would switch over to totals rather than averages in citing statistical leaders – you know, like baseball and football do in basically every category – it would demonstrate the importance of showing up without disqualifying anybody.

It’s interesting to note that Luka Doncic leads the NBA in scoring. But since he’s injured and done for the regular season, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, just 91 points behind with five games left, has a great opportunity to seize the league’s most prestigious statistical crown.

That has to be worth something. As does the Thunder’s best record in the league and SGA’s likely spot on an NBA All-Defense team.

Jokic will win the assists title, but all those games he’s missed have cost him on the rebounds (fourth place) and scoring (10th) lists. Those aren’t MVP-level achievements.

And then there’s Wemby. He’ll be the blocks king, but he’s even farther behind in rebounds (fifth) and scoring (18th).

Total points – coupled with Defensive Player of the Year consideration and the most overachieving of the elite teams – point out why Jaylen Brown, currently third in scoring, is actually a better candidate than the two big men.

If SGA, who played his 65th game Thursday, were to take a game off this week, the door would be open for Brown, already with a 50-point game to his credit, to go nuts in the finale against the Magic and steal the scoring crown George Gervin-style.

I’d tune in for that … and maybe later on when SGA would be forced to counter-punch in an otherwise unwatchable pre-playoff exhibition against the Suns.

My pick: Gilgeous-Alexander.

Rookie of the Year

Here’s where the focus on the 65-game qualification is likely to produce the wrong winner.

Cooper Flagg reached 65 with a record-setting, 51-point explosion Friday against the Mavericks. Some believe that clinched the award.

But reaching this so-called magic number is only serving to detract from the fact that college teammate Kon Knueppel has had a better – and certainly more complete – season. He’s shown up WAY more often (77 games) and has helped lead a surprisingly entertaining team (the Hornets) rather than compiling big numbers for a bad club (Flagg’s Mavericks) that hasn’t scored a meaningful point all season.

Most importantly, unless things go completely sideways in the final week, Knueppel will win the rookie scoring title. He begins play Sunday with a 101-point lead, while only trailing Flagg by insignificant amounts in rebounds and assists.

The problem is: Knueppel couldn’t possibly have to deal with a harsher gauntlet than what’s in front of him – the Timberwolves, Celtics, Pistons and Knicks, all defensive stalwarts.

A couple more Flagg 40’s could make the finale – against a defenseless team already in fishing gear (the Bulls) – potentially historic.

Again I say: I’d tune in both early (Hornets-Knicks) and late (Bulls-Mavericks).

My pick: Knueppel.

#Debunking #NBA #Playoff #Narratives #Breaking #Award #Races #Deadspin.com

Post Comment