×
9 Popular Songs That Were Originally Written for Someone Else

9 Popular Songs That Were Originally Written for Someone Else

It’s difficult to imagine some of our favorite songs being sung by people other than the ones who made them famous. Yet some of the biggest musical hits of recent times were actually originally designated for musicians other than the ones that defined them.

From a Beatles classic to some of the biggest hits of the 2010s, here are nine songs that were originally intended for artists other than the ones who came to define them.

  1. “Umbrella” Was Offered to Britney Spears
  2. “…Baby One More Time” Was Meant For TLC
  3. “Hungry Heart” Was Meant For The Ramones
  4. “Call Me” Was Offered to Stevie Nicks
  5. “Total Eclipse of the Heart” Was Meant For a Nosferatu Musical
  6. “Since U Been Gone” Was Offered to P!nk and Hilary Duff
  7. “The Long and Winding Road” Was Offered to Tom Jones
  8. “All About That Bass” Was Offered to Beyoncé
  9. “How Will I Know” Was Written For Janet Jackson

“Umbrella” Was Offered to Britney Spears

It’s difficult to conceptualize the song “Umbrella” without Rihanna’s distinct vocals and undeniable charisma. The track was a smash hit, hitting number one on the Billboard Charts in 2007 and launching Rihanna to superstardom.

Yet surprisingly, writers Terius “The-Dream” Nash and Christopher “Tricky” Stewart first asked Britney Spears if she’d like to cover the song. When Spears—who was then working on her comeback album Blackout—declined, they next approached Mary J. Blige, whose team bid on the song, though Blige turned it down. “It’s not something that got away from me, it’s just that I know what’s for me and what’s not for me,” Blige later said of the decision. Then Island Def Jam secured the song for Rihanna, and pop history was made.

“…Baby One More Time” Was Meant For TLC

“…Baby One More Time” is inextricably linked to Britney Spears, from her high-pitched vocals to the accompanying music video that helped cement Spears’s star power. Yet the track was originally supposed to be sung by another band: TLC. 

The band rejected it, though, largely because they took issue with the lyric “hit me baby one more time,” which they believed sounded like it referred to domestic violence. “Do I think it’s a hit? Do I think it’s TLC?” member T-Boz said in 2013, per The Guardian. “Was I going to say, ‘Hit me baby one more time?’ Hell no.” Apparently, the lyric was initially the result of songwriter Max Martin and co-producer Rami Yacoub’s mistaken belief that “hit” was an American slang word that meant “call,” but TLC didn’t take it that way. The song was also offered to Robyn and The Backstreet Boys, but eventually went to a newer artist named Britney Spears, and the rest was history. 

“Hungry Heart” Was Meant For The Ramones

Bruce Springsteen’s husky vocals and distinct persona make the track “Hungry Heart” what it is. Yet apparently Springsteen was actually inspired to write the song after a chance meeting with the band the Ramones, and he initially envisioned the song for them. “I saw the Ramones in Asbury Park,” Springsteen said in an interview on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon. “We were talking for a while, and I was like, ‘Man, I’ve got to write the Ramones a song.’”

He went home and scribbled down the track “in about the time it took for me to sing it,” and brought the demo to Johnny Ramone. Yet when the frontman heard the track, he immediately recognized that it belonged to Springsteen. “‘Nah, you better keep that one,’” Springsteen recalled Ramone saying to him, though other reports say it was Springsteen’s manager Jon Landau who wound up finally persuading him to keep the track for himself. Regardless, “Hungry Heart” later became the lead single on Springsteen’s fifth album, The River, and is an iconic contribution to Springsteen’s discography.

“Call Me” Was Offered to Stevie Nicks

It’s hard to confuse Stevie Nicks—who embodied witchy California pop-rock—with Blondie’s Debbie Harry, who was the queen of New York and new wave. Yet one of Harry’s biggest hits was actually originally dreamed up for Nicks.

In 1979, songwriter Giorgio Moroder wrote the theme for the movie American Gigolo that would later become the song “Call Me.” Seeking a singer who could write the lyrics, he first reached out to Nicks, but she was in the middle of launching her solo career and was unable to take on the track.

Moroder then asked Harry, who agreed as long as she could be in charge of the lyrics—and Moroder was thrilled with what emerged, as were legions of fans who embraced the song. “As soon as I heard Deborah singing a rough version of ‘Call Me,’ I knew we had a hit,” Moroder said of Harry’s version.

“Total Eclipse of the Heart” Was Meant For a Nosferatu Musical

Bonnie Tyler’s emotive vocals make “Total Eclipse of the Heart” the ultra-romantic power ballad that it is. But the song was originally meant for a very different audience than the one it ended up reaching. Writer Jim Steinman penned the original version of the song for a musical theater adaptation of Nosferatu, and titled it “Vampires in Love.” But the musical never came to be, and the song remained shelved for a while before Tyler met up with Steinman and lent her vocals to the track, which became one of the most iconic singles of the 1980s. 

While the Nosferatu musical may have been shelved, the song eventually made its way to another vampire musical—Steinman’s 1997 adaptation of Roman Polanski’s The Fearless Vampire Killers—and if you listen closely, you can find some vampiric elements in Tyler’s version. “If anyone listens to the lyrics, they’re really like vampire lines,” Steinman said in an interview with Playbill. “It’s all about the darkness, the power of darkness and love’s place in dark.”

“Since U Been Gone” Was Offered to P!nk and Hilary Duff

Kelly Clarkson’s stratospheric yet silky-smooth vocals are at the center of “Since U Been Gone,” the epic power ballad from her second album Breakaway. Yet songwriters Max Martin and Doctor Luke originally intended the song to be sung by P!nk, another powerhouse vocalist who turned the song down. It was then declined by Hilary Duff before it found its way to Clarkson, who made it a smash hit.

“The Long and Winding Road” Was Offered to Tom Jones

“The Long and Winding Road” is a beloved staple in The Beatles’ discography. The wistful tune will forever be associated with Paul McCartney’s dreamy, timeworn vocals—but if McCartney’s original vision had come to be, it wouldn’t have been a Beatles song at all.

McCartney originally penned the tune while imagining someone else singing it, saying, “I just sat down at my piano in Scotland, started playing, and came up with that song, imagining it was going to be done by someone like Ray Charles.” He then offered the completed song to the Welsh musician Tom Jones, on the condition that it would be Jones’s next single. Jones already had a new single planned, though, so the song was shelved—until it found its way to the Beatles’ Let It Be.

“All About That Bass” Was Offered to Beyoncé

If you’ve ever been in a waiting room or grocery store in the past decade, you likely have heard “All About That Bass” by Meghan Trainor playing over the speakers. The track was written by Trainor and producer Kevin Kadish, but was originally pitched to a dozen other artists, including Beyoncé, per The Guardian, before Trainor wound up releasing the song herself.

“I’ll bet some of them didn’t even know the song was being pitched to them,” Trainor said when asked if she thinks the artists who turned the track regret it. “Some artists get thousands of songs pitched and they never know, so Beyoncé herself probably never heard it. Most of these other artists’ A&R teams said they couldn’t do anything with the song because they didn’t have [the right] artist. That was the problem—there weren’t any singers at the time [who fit the song]. Adele was the only one, but she wasn’t rapping and singing sassy songs with swears in them. But I’m down,” she continued. “I get all the performing royalties!”

“How Will I Know” Was Written For Janet Jackson

Whitney Houston’s “How Will I Know” is an infectious, charming hit defined by Houston’s soaring vocals. Originally written by songwriting duo George Merrill and Shannon Rubicam, it was actually specifically envisioned for Janet Jackson.

“‘How Will I Know’ was written in our funky little Venice, California garage, roughly 1984,” the duo recalled in a press release, per Music Radar. “Written for Janet Jackson (she passed on it as she was about to release her groundbreaking Control album), Brenda Andrews at Irving Music played the demo for A&R icon Gerry Griffith who was songhunting for a ‘new young singer.’” That singer wound up being Whitney Houston, and the song was selected for her first album. When Merrill and Rubicam first heard Houston’s finished version, “I think we about fell on the floor!” they added.

More Music Stories:

#Popular #Songs #Originally #Written
title_words_as_hashtags]

Previous post

Deadspin | Rob Dillingham pours in career-best 26 as Bulls blast Wizards <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/19608969.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/19608969.jpg" alt="NBA: Chicago Bulls at Atlanta Hawks" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Dec 11, 2022; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Chicago Bulls head coach Billy Donavan watches the action against the Atlanta Hawks during the first half at State Farm Arena. Mandatory Credit: Dale Zanine-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>Rob Dillingham’s career-high 26 points off the bench highlighted a balanced scoring effort as the Chicago Bulls rolled to a 129-98 rout of the host Washington Wizards on Tuesday.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>Chicago (30-49) left little doubt on the way to snapping a seven-game losing streak, pouncing on Washington (17-62) with an 9-0 run midway the first quarter. The opening salvo gave the Bulls a lead they held the rest of the way, extending to as many as 37 points behind the trio of Dillingham, Tre Jones and Patrick Williams.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>Jones put up 20 points, his third effort of 19-plus points in his past five games, and he wound up one assist shy of his first double-double since January.</p> </section><section id="section-4"> <p>Williams added 20 points, seven rebounds and six assists.</p> </section><section id="section-5"> <p>The three combined to outscore Washington on their own in the first quarter, producing 21 of Chicago’s 38 points. The Bulls held the Wizards to just 18 in the period.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-6"> <p>Chicago’s Collin Sexton posted 15 points, a team-high nine rebounds and seven assists. Thirty-five of the Bulls’ 46 made field goals were assisted.</p> </section> <section id="section-7"> <p>Leonard Miller and Isaac Okoro rounded out the dominant Bulls performance with 13 and 11 points, respectively.</p> </section><section id="section-8"> <p>Chicago’s defensive effort was likewise among the team’s best of the season, with the 98 points allowed tying the Bulls’ second-lowest yield. The Bulls held Will Riley to just two points after the rookie logged career highs in the both of the previous two contests with 30 and 31 points.</p> </section><section id="section-9"> <p>Riley shot just 1-for-13 from the floor, including 0-for-5 from 3-point range, and the Wizards went 11-for-38 (28.9%) from beyond the arc. Washington also committed 22 turnovers that the Bulls converted into 22 points.</p> </section><section id="section-10"> <p>Bilal Coulibaly led the Wizards with 19 points. First-year forward Julian Reese posted his fourth double-double in his 10 NBA games, going for 17 points and 11 rebounds.</p> </section><section id="section-11"> <p>Sharife Cooper added another 17 points off the bench as Washington lost its seventh game in a row and fell for the 23th time in 24 games. Bub Carrington had 14 points and Jamir Watkins recorded 13.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-12"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section> </div> #Deadspin #Rob #Dillingham #pours #careerbest #Bulls #blast #Wizards

Next post

Sooryavanshi vs Bumrah — Much-awaited duel offers expected fireworks in Royal win against Mumbai Indians <div id="content-body-70837310" itemprop="articleBody"><p>Everybody knew. The moment the revised playing conditions for the rain-affected Rajasthan Royals-Mumbai Indians clash confirmed that only one bowler per team can bowl three overs, everybody nodded in agreement. Jasprit Bumrah is going to get three.</p><p>Why bother thinking?</p><p>The one other thing everyone knew, or rather expected, was the coming together of Bumrah and Vaibhav Sooryavanshi.</p><p>The two had never faced off in a competitive setting. It was an intriguing prospect – this fearless teenage batter, taking the world by storm, going up against the most-feared bowler of this generation.</p><p>There was also a sense of curiosity. Would Sooryavanshi treat the pace ace with reverence? Would Bumrah go extra hard at the 15-year-old?</p><p>It could have helped Sooryavanshi’s cause that this was an 11-over shootout. But would we have played any differently if this were a longer game? Highly doubtful.</p><p>And after all the narrative-building, Bumrah and Sooryavanshi did square off in the second over, right after Yashasvi Jaiswal had ripped apart Deepak Chahar in a 22-run over.</p><p>In all fairness, Bumrah’s first offering to Sooryavanshi was a gift – an overpitched delivery that was in the batter’s hitting arc.</p><p>But what can’t be missed was the Royals’ opener’s intent. He had already shuffled into his hitting position. There was nothing half-measured about his much-talked-about bat swing. The contact and follow-through fell in place. The ball soared over the long-on fence and deep into the stands, while Sooryavanshi looked on unbothered.</p><p>As the crowd erupted in applause, Bumrah walked back to his run-up mark with a smile on his face. Was it amusement or bewilderment? Or was it helplessness? One can never be sure.</p><p>Nevertheless, Bumrah’s reaction can probably be observed as an amalgamation of our collective thoughts on Sooryavanshi.</p><p>It has been proven beyond doubt that he is an inexplicable talent who poses more questions than answers for all stakeholders.</p><p>As a teammate, a coach or a captain, how do you nurture his prodigious talents while insulating him from innumerable treasures and boundless fame that await him?</p><p>As an opponent, what do you do against this batter who strikes the ball with such relentless ferocity and could do it for two more decades?</p><p>As a viewer, how do you comprehend the fact that a kid born in 2011 is dominating world-class bowlers, tampering with one’s own sense of time?</p><p>Let’s keep the existential questions aside for now and circle back to the Bumrah-Sooryavanshi mini-battle. Having been swatted away for a six, the MI pacer went to his go-to option for the second ball – a back-of-a-length off-cutter into the batter’s body.</p><p>Sooryavanshi, though, was ready for it. He had put himself inside the line and then safely tucked it to the legside for a single – a bit of ‘smart and sensible’ cricket for the traditionalists.</p><p>Jaiswal would immediately return the strike to Sooryavanshi. If there was a feeling that the teenager wasn’t going to take any further risks against Bumrah, it was to be proven wrong immediately.</p><p>Bumrah stuck to the same hard length. In fact, he had shifted the line further away from the stumps. But Sooryavanshi was ready for it, again. A swivel pull, and the ball zooms over square leg for another six.</p><p>This was already in the realms of ridiculousness. This is ‘The Bumrah.’ And this 15-year-old is going after him without a care in the world.</p><p>There were two more deliveries in this match-up. Both full-tosses. Both presumably attempted yorkers. Almost bafflingly, Sooryavanshi failed to put both those easier pickings away.</p><p>And in the end, we get five balls from this battle – two sixes, one single and two dot balls. Dramatic enough to write about.</p><p>So we go back to the bigger question. What do you do with Sooryavanshi? At least for one part, it is safe to assume that he has found himself in the right place.</p><p>Rajasthan Royals has, so far, encouraged and set him up to play his natural style of cricket. The team also has, through its High Performance Centre, allowed the youngster to train at an unrivalled standard, both in terms of quality and quantity.</p><p>For the other parts of the Sooryavanshi conundrum, we will just have to wait and watch as it unfolds.</p><p class="publish-time" id="end-of-article">Published on Apr 08, 2026</p></div> #Sooryavanshi #Bumrah #Muchawaited #duel #offers #expected #fireworks #Royal #win #Mumbai #Indians

Post Comment