दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने सुरक्षित किए अभिषेक शर्मा के पर्सनैलिटी राइट्स, AI से बने फर्जी कंटेंट पर लगी रोक
भारतीय क्रिकेट टीम के युवा स्टार अभिषेक शर्मा को दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट का साथ मिला है।…
Sports
The legal dispute surrounding Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy has taken another turn after the Delhi High Court adjourned the hearing on Salman Khan’s plea seeking to restrain the film’s release until July 6. The latest hearing did not result in any interim order against the film, prompting producer Amit Jani to react publicly on social media.
Salman Khan has approached the Delhi High Court alleging that the proposed film violates his personality rights by drawing direct references to him and his personal life. The actor has objected to the film’s promotional material, claiming it includes a lookalike sporting his signature blue bracelet and references to his 1998 blackbuck poaching case as well as his alleged rivalry with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi.
Amit Jani reacts after court hearing
Soon after Wednesday’s proceedings, producer Amit Jani shared his response on X, claiming that Salman Khan had not received any relief from the court.
He wrote, “Salman Khan still hasn’t received relief from the Delhi High Court today, no ban on the film, hearing of the case adjourned till July 6. I had said earlier too that for the court, there is no star, nor do they acknowledge any glamour, just by calling oneself the father of Bollywood, the blackbuck won’t stop-this will release in 8000 cinema halls and simultaneously across the whole world.”
सलमान खान को आज भी नही मिली दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट से राहत, फ़िल्म पे कोई रोक नही, मामले की सुनवाई 6 जुलाई तक टली
मैंने पहले भी कहा था अदालत के लिए ना कोई स्टार है ना वे किसी ग्लैमर को मानती है, खुद से खुद को बॉलीवुड का बाप कहने से काला हिरण नहीं रुक जाएगी ये 8000 सिनेमाघरों पे रिलीज…— Amit Jani (@AmitJaniIND) July 1, 2026
Producer tells court film has not been submitted to CBFC
During the hearing, counsel appearing for the producers informed Justice Jyoti Singh that Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy has not yet been submitted to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for certification.
When the court asked whether the film was scheduled for release, the producer’s counsel clarified that it was not. The counsel further submitted that no film can be released without obtaining CBFC certification and assured the court that the producers would not approach the censor board before the next date of hearing.
Taking note of the submissions and observing that the producer’s rejoinder had not yet been placed on record, the court adjourned the hearing on Salman Khan’s interim injunction plea to July 6.
BOLLYWOOD NEWS – LIVE UPDATES
Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & Upcoming Movies 2026 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.
Bollywood hindi news
Amit Jani,Delhi HC,Delhi High Court,Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy,Lawrence Bishnoi,News,Salman Khan,Social Media,The Delhi HC,The Delhi High Court,Twitter,X">Kala Hiran producer Amit Jani reacts after Delhi High Court adjourns Salman Khan’s plea till July 6: “Will release in 8000 cinema halls”
The legal dispute surrounding Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy has taken another turn after the Delhi High Court adjourned the hearing on Salman Khan’s plea seeking to restrain the film’s release until July 6. The latest hearing did not result in any interim order against the film, prompting producer Amit Jani to react publicly on social media.
Kala Hiran producer Amit Jani reacts after Delhi High Court adjourns Salman Khan’s plea till July 6: “Will release in 8000 cinema halls”Salman Khan has approached the Delhi High Court alleging that the proposed film violates his personality rights by drawing direct references to him and his personal life. The actor has objected to the film’s promotional material, claiming it includes a lookalike sporting his signature blue bracelet and references to his 1998 blackbuck poaching case as well as his alleged rivalry with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi.
Amit Jani reacts after court hearing
Soon after Wednesday’s proceedings, producer Amit Jani shared his response on X, claiming that Salman Khan had not received any relief from the court.
He wrote, “Salman Khan still hasn’t received relief from the Delhi High Court today, no ban on the film, hearing of the case adjourned till July 6. I had said earlier too that for the court, there is no star, nor do they acknowledge any glamour, just by calling oneself the father of Bollywood, the blackbuck won’t stop-this will release in 8000 cinema halls and simultaneously across the whole world.”
सलमान खान को आज भी नही मिली दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट से राहत, फ़िल्म पे कोई रोक नही, मामले की सुनवाई 6 जुलाई तक टली
मैंने पहले भी कहा था अदालत के लिए ना कोई स्टार है ना वे किसी ग्लैमर को मानती है, खुद से खुद को बॉलीवुड का बाप कहने से काला हिरण नहीं रुक जाएगी ये 8000 सिनेमाघरों पे रिलीज…
— Amit Jani (@AmitJaniIND) July 1, 2026
Producer tells court film has not been submitted to CBFC
During the hearing, counsel appearing for the producers informed Justice Jyoti Singh that Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy has not yet been submitted to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for certification.
When the court asked whether the film was scheduled for release, the producer’s counsel clarified that it was not. The counsel further submitted that no film can be released without obtaining CBFC certification and assured the court that the producers would not approach the censor board before the next date of hearing.
Taking note of the submissions and observing that the producer’s rejoinder had not yet been placed on record, the court adjourned the hearing on Salman Khan’s interim injunction plea to July 6.
BOLLYWOOD NEWS – LIVE UPDATES
Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & Upcoming Movies 2026 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.
सलमान खान को आज भी नही मिली दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट से राहत, फ़िल्म पे कोई रोक नही, मामले की सुनवाई 6 जुलाई तक टली
मैंने पहले भी कहा था अदालत के लिए ना कोई स्टार है ना वे किसी ग्लैमर को मानती है, खुद से खुद को बॉलीवुड का बाप कहने से काला हिरण नहीं रुक जाएगी ये 8000 सिनेमाघरों पे रिलीज…
— Amit Jani (@AmitJaniIND) July 1, 2026
The legal dispute surrounding Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy has taken another turn after the Delhi High Court adjourned the hearing on Salman Khan’s plea seeking to restrain the film’s release until July 6. The latest hearing did not result in any interim order against the film, prompting producer Amit Jani to react publicly on social media.
Salman Khan has approached the Delhi High Court alleging that the proposed film violates his personality rights by drawing direct references to him and his personal life. The actor has objected to the film’s promotional material, claiming it includes a lookalike sporting his signature blue bracelet and references to his 1998 blackbuck poaching case as well as his alleged rivalry with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi.
Amit Jani reacts after court hearing
Soon after Wednesday’s proceedings, producer Amit Jani shared his response on X, claiming that Salman Khan had not received any relief from the court.
He wrote, “Salman Khan still hasn’t received relief from the Delhi High Court today, no ban on the film, hearing of the case adjourned till July 6. I had said earlier too that for the court, there is no star, nor do they acknowledge any glamour, just by calling oneself the father of Bollywood, the blackbuck won’t stop-this will release in 8000 cinema halls and simultaneously across the whole world.”
सलमान खान को आज भी नही मिली दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट से राहत, फ़िल्म पे कोई रोक नही, मामले की सुनवाई 6 जुलाई तक टली
मैंने पहले भी कहा था अदालत के लिए ना कोई स्टार है ना वे किसी ग्लैमर को मानती है, खुद से खुद को बॉलीवुड का बाप कहने से काला हिरण नहीं रुक जाएगी ये 8000 सिनेमाघरों पे रिलीज…— Amit Jani (@AmitJaniIND) July 1, 2026
Producer tells court film has not been submitted to CBFC
During the hearing, counsel appearing for the producers informed Justice Jyoti Singh that Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy has not yet been submitted to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for certification.
When the court asked whether the film was scheduled for release, the producer’s counsel clarified that it was not. The counsel further submitted that no film can be released without obtaining CBFC certification and assured the court that the producers would not approach the censor board before the next date of hearing.
Taking note of the submissions and observing that the producer’s rejoinder had not yet been placed on record, the court adjourned the hearing on Salman Khan’s interim injunction plea to July 6.
BOLLYWOOD NEWS – LIVE UPDATES
Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & Upcoming Movies 2026 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.
The legal dispute surrounding Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy has taken another turn after…
International news
‘गलत है UPSC की आंसर-की’: दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट बोला- सिर्फ री-इवैल्यूएशन नहीं, गलत जवाबों की भी हो सकती है जांच
{"_id":"6a4124c12b3aa278ef0d0363","slug":"delhi-hc-asks-cat-to-examine-candidate-plea-alleging-wrong-answers-in-answer-key-2026-06-28","type":"feature-story","status":"publish","title_hn":"'गलत है UPSC की आंसर-की': दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट बोला- सिर्फ री-इवैल्यूएशन नहीं, गलत जवाबों की भी…
Sports news
#Delhi #High #Court #directs #AITA #expediate #Constitutional #amendments #election">Delhi High Court directs AITA to expediate Constitutional amendments and election
The Delhi High Court directed the interim Executive Committee of the All India Tennis Association (AITA) to expediate the process of amending its Constitution and bringing it in line with the National Sports Governance Act, 2025 and National Sports Governance Rules, 2026.
The Court said that a fresh election under the amended Constitution will have to be held on or before September 30, 2026.
The nudge was part of the interim order passed on June 18 in an appeal filed by the AITA, and players Somdev Devvarman and Purav Raja, against the judgment delivered in late April which removed the stay on the results of the AITA election held in September 2024 and appointed Justice (Retd.) Gita Mittal as the AITA administrator.
New power centre
The AITA contended that the original judgment, which arose out of a petition filed by Devvarman and Raja, did not find any illegality in the elections, and the appointment of an administrator in such a scenario was impermissible and had created a “parallel structure”.
The AITA also stated that tennis’ world governing body – the International Tennis Federation (ITF) – may construe this as “third-party interference” and derecognise it. The remuneration of ₹10 lakh per month for the administrator was termed “excessive, arbitrary and unaffordable”.
Devvarman and Raja, while welcoming the appointment of the administrator, had objected on the grounds that 2024 election was not held according to the law of the land then – the National Sports Code, 2011 – and the officials thus elected cannot be part of the interim management.
ITF query
The Union Sports Ministry told the Court that it does not support the appointment of the administrator and submitted that it had indeed received a letter on May 18 from the ITF seeking clarification.
The Ministry, however, stated that ITF recognised the temporary nature of the proceedings and that the world body would only act if the timelines in the original judgment aren’t adhered to.
Race against time
The Court has now asked the AITA to examine the draft amendments already proposed by the administrator and submit its suggestions and objections by June 25. The administrator, after hearing the AITA, should finalise the amendments by July 15.
An Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the AITA should be convened by July 31 to ratify these amendments, and the whole process ought to culminate in an election by the end of September.
Interestingly, the Court clarified that state associations affiliated to the AITA can vote in the EGM and in the new AITA election “irrespective of whether they are compliant with the Sports Act and the Sports Governance Rules at the time of voting”. The state bodies are required to comply with the new rules on or before December 31.
The Court further said that any action at the EGM will be subject to the final outcome of the present case, and this would allay the concerns of Devvarman and Raja regarding the AITA not adopting the amendments proposed by the administrator.
Published on Jun 23, 2026
The Delhi High Court directed the interim Executive Committee of the All India Tennis Association (AITA) to expediate the process of amending its Constitution and bringing it in line with the National Sports Governance Act, 2025 and National Sports Governance Rules, 2026.
The Court said that a fresh election under the amended Constitution will have to be held on or before September 30, 2026.
The nudge was part of the interim order passed on June 18 in an appeal filed by the AITA, and players Somdev Devvarman and Purav Raja, against the judgment delivered in late April which removed the stay on the results of the AITA election held in September 2024 and appointed Justice (Retd.) Gita Mittal as the AITA administrator.
New power centre
The AITA contended that the original judgment, which arose out of a petition filed by Devvarman and Raja, did not find any illegality in the elections, and the appointment of an administrator in such a scenario was impermissible and had created a “parallel structure”.
The AITA also stated that tennis’ world governing body – the International Tennis Federation (ITF) – may construe this as “third-party interference” and derecognise it. The remuneration of ₹10 lakh per month for the administrator was termed “excessive, arbitrary and unaffordable”.
Devvarman and Raja, while welcoming the appointment of the administrator, had objected on the grounds that 2024 election was not held according to the law of the land then – the National Sports Code, 2011 – and the officials thus elected cannot be part of the interim management.
ITF query
The Union Sports Ministry told the Court that it does not support the appointment of the administrator and submitted that it had indeed received a letter on May 18 from the ITF seeking clarification.
The Ministry, however, stated that ITF recognised the temporary nature of the proceedings and that the world body would only act if the timelines in the original judgment aren’t adhered to.
Race against time
The Court has now asked the AITA to examine the draft amendments already proposed by the administrator and submit its suggestions and objections by June 25. The administrator, after hearing the AITA, should finalise the amendments by July 15.
An Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the AITA should be convened by July 31 to ratify these amendments, and the whole process ought to culminate in an election by the end of September.
Interestingly, the Court clarified that state associations affiliated to the AITA can vote in the EGM and in the new AITA election “irrespective of whether they are compliant with the Sports Act and the Sports Governance Rules at the time of voting”. The state bodies are required to comply with the new rules on or before December 31.
The Court further said that any action at the EGM will be subject to the final outcome of the present case, and this would allay the concerns of Devvarman and Raja regarding the AITA not adopting the amendments proposed by the administrator.
Published on Jun 23, 2026
The Delhi High Court directed the interim Executive Committee of the All India Tennis Association…
Sports
विनेश फोगाट का ट्रायल रुकवाने सुप्रीम कोर्ट पहुंचा WFI:हाईकोर्ट ने रेसलर को दी थी राहत; एशियन गेम्स के लिए 30-31 मई को होना है ट्रॉयल
भारतीय कुश्ती महासंघ (WFI) ने पहलवान विनेश फोगाट को एशियन गेम्स 2026 चयन ट्रायल में…
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the Union government and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to examine allegations that Dhurandhar The Revenge, starring Ranveer Singh, may have violated provisions of the Official Secrets Act by allegedly revealing sensitive operational details linked to India’s armed forces.
The matter came up before a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia after a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Deepak Kumar, a Head Constable with the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). The petitioner raised concerns over the film’s content and claimed that certain scenes and references could pose risks to the country’s security and integrity.
According to the plea, the film allegedly depicts operational locations and characters inspired by senior officials and deceased servicemen in a manner that may not be in the national interest. The petition further alleged that Dhurandhar 2 reveals details related to drugs being worked on by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).
During the hearing, the Court acknowledged that the film may be a fictional and entertainment-driven work, but observed that the issues raised in the petition could not be dismissed outright. “Even if the movie is a work of fiction and imagination and is made for entertainment purposes, the impact of the movie can’t be denied,” the Bench observed.
The Court also noted that concerns surrounding the disclosure of defence-related operational details and military tactics deserved careful consideration by the concerned authorities. “The censor board should have some guidelines. We will only direct you to consider his representation and take an informed decision,” the Court stated during the proceedings.
Rather than issuing direct restrictions on the film, the High Court disposed of the plea by directing the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) and the CBFC to treat the petition itself as a formal representation and take an appropriate decision on the issues raised.
“Having regard to the nature of issue and concerns raised in the petition, we are of the opinion that the concerns raised by the petitioner needs to be considered and addressed appropriately. We dispose of the writ petition with direction to MIB and CBFC to consider the entire writ petition as a representation and take an appropriate decision on the issue raised therein,” the Court ordered.
Dhurandhar The Revenge has already been in the spotlight due to growing buzz around Ranveer Singh’s role and the film’s high-scale action narrative. However, the latest legal development has now added another layer of attention to the project, particularly around the depiction of defence and intelligence-related themes in mainstream cinema.
The case also reignites the broader debate around creative freedom versus national security concerns in films inspired by military operations and real-life events. While filmmakers often draw from reality to enhance authenticity, courts and certification authorities continue to face the challenge of balancing cinematic storytelling with sensitive national interests.
More Pages: Dhurandhar The Revenge Box Office Collection , Dhurandhar The Revenge Movie Review
BOLLYWOOD NEWS – LIVE UPDATES
Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & Upcoming Movies 2026 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.
Bollywood hindi news
CBFC,Central Board Of Film Certification,Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC),Defence Research and Development Organisation,Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO),Delhi HC,Delhi High Court,Dhurandhar – Part 2,Dhurandhar 2,Dhurandhar 2 The Revenge,Dhurandhar The Revenge,DRDO,News,PIL,Public Interest Litigation,Public Interest Litigation (PIL),The Delhi High Court">Dhurandhar The Revenge lands in legal trouble over alleged disclosure of defence details; Delhi HC asks government and CBFC to take informed decision
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the Union government and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to examine allegations that Dhurandhar The Revenge, starring Ranveer Singh, may have violated provisions of the Official Secrets Act by allegedly revealing sensitive operational details linked to India’s armed forces.
Dhurandhar The Revenge lands in legal trouble over alleged disclosure of defence details; Delhi HC asks government and CBFC to take informed decisionThe matter came up before a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia after a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Deepak Kumar, a Head Constable with the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). The petitioner raised concerns over the film’s content and claimed that certain scenes and references could pose risks to the country’s security and integrity.
According to the plea, the film allegedly depicts operational locations and characters inspired by senior officials and deceased servicemen in a manner that may not be in the national interest. The petition further alleged that Dhurandhar 2 reveals details related to drugs being worked on by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).
During the hearing, the Court acknowledged that the film may be a fictional and entertainment-driven work, but observed that the issues raised in the petition could not be dismissed outright. “Even if the movie is a work of fiction and imagination and is made for entertainment purposes, the impact of the movie can’t be denied,” the Bench observed.
The Court also noted that concerns surrounding the disclosure of defence-related operational details and military tactics deserved careful consideration by the concerned authorities. “The censor board should have some guidelines. We will only direct you to consider his representation and take an informed decision,” the Court stated during the proceedings.
Rather than issuing direct restrictions on the film, the High Court disposed of the plea by directing the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) and the CBFC to treat the petition itself as a formal representation and take an appropriate decision on the issues raised.
“Having regard to the nature of issue and concerns raised in the petition, we are of the opinion that the concerns raised by the petitioner needs to be considered and addressed appropriately. We dispose of the writ petition with direction to MIB and CBFC to consider the entire writ petition as a representation and take an appropriate decision on the issue raised therein,” the Court ordered.
Dhurandhar The Revenge has already been in the spotlight due to growing buzz around Ranveer Singh’s role and the film’s high-scale action narrative. However, the latest legal development has now added another layer of attention to the project, particularly around the depiction of defence and intelligence-related themes in mainstream cinema.
The case also reignites the broader debate around creative freedom versus national security concerns in films inspired by military operations and real-life events. While filmmakers often draw from reality to enhance authenticity, courts and certification authorities continue to face the challenge of balancing cinematic storytelling with sensitive national interests.
More Pages: Dhurandhar The Revenge Box Office Collection , Dhurandhar The Revenge Movie Review
BOLLYWOOD NEWS – LIVE UPDATES
Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & Upcoming Movies 2026 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the Union government and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to examine allegations that Dhurandhar The Revenge, starring Ranveer Singh, may have violated provisions of the Official Secrets Act by allegedly revealing sensitive operational details linked to India’s armed forces.
The matter came up before a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia after a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Deepak Kumar, a Head Constable with the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). The petitioner raised concerns over the film’s content and claimed that certain scenes and references could pose risks to the country’s security and integrity.
According to the plea, the film allegedly depicts operational locations and characters inspired by senior officials and deceased servicemen in a manner that may not be in the national interest. The petition further alleged that Dhurandhar 2 reveals details related to drugs being worked on by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).
During the hearing, the Court acknowledged that the film may be a fictional and entertainment-driven work, but observed that the issues raised in the petition could not be dismissed outright. “Even if the movie is a work of fiction and imagination and is made for entertainment purposes, the impact of the movie can’t be denied,” the Bench observed.
The Court also noted that concerns surrounding the disclosure of defence-related operational details and military tactics deserved careful consideration by the concerned authorities. “The censor board should have some guidelines. We will only direct you to consider his representation and take an informed decision,” the Court stated during the proceedings.
Rather than issuing direct restrictions on the film, the High Court disposed of the plea by directing the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) and the CBFC to treat the petition itself as a formal representation and take an appropriate decision on the issues raised.
“Having regard to the nature of issue and concerns raised in the petition, we are of the opinion that the concerns raised by the petitioner needs to be considered and addressed appropriately. We dispose of the writ petition with direction to MIB and CBFC to consider the entire writ petition as a representation and take an appropriate decision on the issue raised therein,” the Court ordered.
Dhurandhar The Revenge has already been in the spotlight due to growing buzz around Ranveer Singh’s role and the film’s high-scale action narrative. However, the latest legal development has now added another layer of attention to the project, particularly around the depiction of defence and intelligence-related themes in mainstream cinema.
The case also reignites the broader debate around creative freedom versus national security concerns in films inspired by military operations and real-life events. While filmmakers often draw from reality to enhance authenticity, courts and certification authorities continue to face the challenge of balancing cinematic storytelling with sensitive national interests.
More Pages: Dhurandhar The Revenge Box Office Collection , Dhurandhar The Revenge Movie Review
BOLLYWOOD NEWS – LIVE UPDATES
Catch us for latest Bollywood News, New Bollywood Movies update, Box office collection, New Movies Release , Bollywood News Hindi, Entertainment News, Bollywood Live News Today & Upcoming Movies 2026 and stay updated with latest hindi movies only on Bollywood Hungama.
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the Union government and the Central Board of…
