×
11 Best Mobile Game Controllers (2025): iPhone or Android

11 Best Mobile Game Controllers (2025): iPhone or Android

Other Game Controllers We’ve Tested

There are several other mobile controllers we tested that just missed out on a place above or failed to make the grade.

Photograph: Simon Hill

Acer Nitro Mobile Gaming Controller for £70: The compact design is great for portability, and Acer’s controller even folds in half to slide into your pocket or bag. You can plug in devices up to 8.3 inches in size via USB-C, and the controller has standard offset joysticks, four standard face buttons, and four shoulder triggers. Everything feels a bit cramped and basic; the triggers are OK, but everything else feels a bit meh. There’s a USB-C port for pass-through charging, but it’s lacking other features to justify the price (no Hall effect, no customization, no software). This is only available in the UK right now.

Gulikit Elves 2 Pro for $50: The shape is reminiscent of old Sega controllers, but Gulikit packed Hall effect joysticks, nine levels of vibration, and six-axis gyro motion control into this Bluetooth controller. The shoulder buttons are nice and clicky, and the floating 8-way D-pad is decent for fighting games and platformers, though it and the four face buttons use a membrane. It’s compact, so I found it a little uncomfortable to use for extended periods, though I have big hands.

GXTrust Mylox Wireless Mobile Controller for £45: This large cradle-style controller connects via Bluetooth 5.0 rather than USB-C. It supports basic haptic feedback and has RGB LED-illuminated buttons. It’s pretty comfortable to use, but it feels kinda cheap, and despite the large design, the buttons and triggers are small. I’m not keen on the D-pad. If you turn on the lighting, the battery life falls well short of the 12 hours suggested. This is only available in the UK and Europe.

11 Best Mobile Game Controllers  iPhone or Android

Gamesir X3 Pro for $80: This replaces the X3 and stretches open to cradle virtually any Android phone (or USB-C iPhones) in its rubbery embrace. It feels good, with customizable grips, clicky buttons, and Hall effect thumbsticks with different-sized detachable caps in the lovely zip-up carry case. The headline feature is the enormous fan on the back capable of serious cooling power, which could come in handy since smartphones can get uncomfortably warm when you’re gaming for a long time, though I found the sound annoying, and the X3 Pro is very bulky. The customization options are welcome, but the GameSir app is a bit buggy and confusing.

Asus ROG Tessen for $104: My excitement at the prospect of a mobile controller from Asus waned quite quickly when I started using the ROG Tessen. It has a neat folding design, responsive controls, and pass-through charging. I liked the programmable back paddles, and there’s RGB lighting to jazz it up. But the thumbsticks felt uncomfortable quite quickly, and the buttons proved a little noisy. This is also Android-only and doesn’t work with any iPhones (even USB-C iPhones).

Gamesir X4 Aileron for $100: This controller has plenty going for it, including a compact design, RGB lighting, Hall effect sticks, and tactile buttons. It comes in two parts, which is great for folding it away neatly, but means you must pair one side, then the other, and it can be finicky. It’s not a bad effort, but there are better options above.

CRKD Atom Controller for $20: This teeny tiny controller is super cute and very portable, with a wrist strap you can connect to a bag. Battery life goes up to 10 hours with a USB-C port for recharging, though I found it sometimes switched itself on in my pocket. It’s not big or comfortable enough to use for a long time, but if you need a super portable emergency controller, it could fit the bill.

Dark blue angular semiclear video game controller with rectangular console in the middle. Left side has a joystick and...

Photograph: Simon Hill

Turtle Beach Atom Controller for $50: With a clever two-piece design, this controller folds away neatly, but feels insecure without a back. The clamps on each side are awkward, particularly with phones sporting large camera modules. I had trouble connecting, and dislike that the right side has to be turned on separately (press the B and menu buttons). The right side connects wirelessly (2.4 GHz), but the controller connects to your phone via Bluetooth. It mostly worked fine for me, but when I played Jydge, the movement was inverted on the left stick. You get around 20 hours of battery life. It takes about two hours to charge. If portability is your main concern, it may be worth a look.

PowerA XP Ultra for $80: I love the idea of combining loads of options into a controller, and PowerA’s crazy XP Ultra is certainly versatile. It works wirelessly with your Xbox, Windows PC, or Android phone, offering solid battery life (up to 40 hours via Bluetooth or 60 hours for Xbox). But the gimmicky mini controller that slides out, Transformer-style, for gaming on the go is too small and hard to grip comfortably. The buttons, triggers, and sticks are all good, and the clip works fine for holding your phone, but the D-pad is stiff. All in all, it’s a pricey mixed bag.

Riot PWR iOS Xbox Edition Cloud Gaming Controller for $20: This is a Made for iPhone-certified controller for Apple’s handset or iPad gaming (older Lightning port devices) that boasts pass-through charging, direct Lightning cable connection, and a 3.5-mm audio port. It feels like an Xbox controller, supports Xbox Cloud Gaming or remote play, and comes with one free month of Game Pass Ultimate. On the downside, the cable is a bit messy. The Riot PWR MFi Controller for ($40) is almost identical, but without the garish green styling and colored Xbox buttons. There’s a USB-C option too.

Turtle Beach Recon Cloud for $40: Here is another Xbox-branded controller that supports Xbox Cloud Gaming and Remote Play and comes with one free month of Game Pass Ultimate. It feels good in-hand, has a solid phone clip, and works with Android, Xbox, and Windows. It also features some audio enhancements (when plugged in), programmable buttons, and a handy Pro-Aim feature that reduces sensitivity on the right stick for aiming in FPS games. It’s a good upgrade pick over the PowerA controller listed above, but only if you want the extra features.

PowerA Moga XP7-X Plus for $94: This controller offers everything the XP-5 X does, but you can also remove the stand in the center to slot in your phone (my Pixel 6 Pro fits nicely). It is sturdy, offers plenty of buttons (only a screenshot button is missing), and can wirelessly charge your phone. But it is expensive, has a Micro USB port when I’d prefer USB-C, and has only a 2,000 mAh battery, so stick with the XP-5 X unless you want that spring-loaded cradle to fit your phone in.

8BitDo SN30 Pro for $45: Conjuring memories of the SNES, this controller works with Android, Windows, MacOS, and Switch. It has built-in rumble, a solid D-pad, good battery life, and a USB-C port.


Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting that’s too important to ignore for just $2.50 $1 per month for 1 year. Includes unlimited digital access and exclusive subscriber-only content. Subscribe Today.

Source link
#Mobile #Game #Controllers #iPhone #Android

Previous post

सिट्रोएन C3 स्पोर्ट एडिशन लॉन्च, शुरुआती कीमत ₹6.44 लाख: नए ग्राफिक्स के साथ 6 एयरबैग स्टैंडर्ड सेफ्टी फीचर्स, टाटा टियागो से मुकाबला

Next post

‘साइबर अटैक कर IPL के दौरान बंद कर दी थी लाइटें’, पाकिस्तान के रक्षा मंत्री ने दावा कर उड़वाया मजाक | ‘Lights were switched off during IPL through cyber attack’, Pakistan’s Defence Minister made fun of it by claiming


Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.

The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.

“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

Climate-driven cooling constraints

For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.

The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.

“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”

By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

A troubling feedback loop

While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.

Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.

Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.

#Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming">The Cheapest Way to Cool Data Centers Won’t Work in a Warmer World 
                Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world. The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse. “We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

 Climate-driven cooling constraints For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

 To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios. The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

 Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events. “From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.” By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

 A troubling feedback loop While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves. Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

 “Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write. Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.      #Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming

AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.

The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.

“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

Climate-driven cooling constraints

For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.

The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.

“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”

By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

A troubling feedback loop

While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.

Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.

Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.

#Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming">The Cheapest Way to Cool Data Centers Won’t Work in a Warmer World The Cheapest Way to Cool Data Centers Won’t Work in a Warmer World 
                Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world. The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse. “We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

 Climate-driven cooling constraints For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

 To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios. The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

 Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events. “From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.” By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

 A troubling feedback loop While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves. Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

 “Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write. Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.      #Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming

Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.

The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.

“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

Climate-driven cooling constraints

For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.

The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.

“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”

By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

A troubling feedback loop

While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.

Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.

Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.

#Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming

The end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.

The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.

Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”

You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.

Here’s how to watch the final games.

Semifinals

France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on Tuesday July 14

England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on Wednesday July 15

Third Place Playoff

The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.

Final

The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.

The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.

Where to Stream

If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.

FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).

In partnership with Telemundo, Peacock is streaming all of the games in Spanish. You can find all the official broadcasters on the FIFA website.

New Competition

This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.

Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.

#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer">How to Watch the 2026 World Cup Semifinals and FinalsThe end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.Here’s how to watch the final games.SemifinalsFrance vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on Tuesday July 14England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on Wednesday July 15Third Place PlayoffThe two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.FinalThe World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.Where to StreamIf you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for  per month.FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently  per month. Other paid options include Fubo ( per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ( per month).In partnership with Telemundo, Peacock is streaming all of the games in Spanish. You can find all the official broadcasters on the FIFA website.New CompetitionThis World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer

World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.

The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.

Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”

You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.

Here’s how to watch the final games.

Semifinals

France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on Tuesday July 14

England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on Wednesday July 15

Third Place Playoff

The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.

Final

The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.

The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.

Where to Stream

If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.

FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).

In partnership with Telemundo, Peacock is streaming all of the games in Spanish. You can find all the official broadcasters on the FIFA website.

New Competition

This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.

Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.

#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer">How to Watch the 2026 World Cup Semifinals and Finals

The end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.

The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.

Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”

You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.

Here’s how to watch the final games.

Semifinals

France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on Tuesday July 14

England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on Wednesday July 15

Third Place Playoff

The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.

Final

The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.

The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.

Where to Stream

If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.

FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).

In partnership with Telemundo, Peacock is streaming all of the games in Spanish. You can find all the official broadcasters on the FIFA website.

New Competition

This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.

Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.

#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer

Post Comment