×
NFL Draft’s 10 biggest busts in history  It’s time to dive into a list nobody wants to see their team on. An NFL Draft bust can happen due to a variety of factors: Sometimes it’s completely botching the process and selecting a player with mammoth red flags, perhaps it’s due to drafting out of desperation which leads to a wasted pick, or on occasion you might take the right player, but select them at the wrong time for a franchise — causing them to bust for one team, then have success elsewhere due to a better fit.For a draft bust to be truly legendary, there needs to be a mixture of high stakes and the lowest possible return. It also helps if by selecting the player your team missed out on a generational, transformative talent. There will be no shortage of these stories on the list either.No. 10: Charles Rodgers, WR — No. 2 overall, Detroit Lions (2003)Everything pointed to Charles Rodgers being an absolute stud in the NFL, and being College Football’s top receiver from Michigan State, going to the Lions — well, it felt like a dream. Instead everything turned into a nightmare, with Rodgers breaking his clavicle during his rookie year which began a downward spiral.Allowed to leave the team to rehab from his injury, demons from Rodgers’ past swallowed him whole. Off-field concerns prior to the draft dominated the rest of his short-lived NFL career, as Rodgers was suspended three times for violating the NFL’s substance abuse policy in two years. He was cut in 2006 giving the Lions 440 total receiving yards.The player taken one spot after him: Hall of Fame receiver Andre Johnson.No. 9: Trey Lance, QB — No. 3 overall, San Francisco 49ers (2021)To this day I refuse to believe the 49ers traded up with the intention of taking Trey Lance in the 2021 NFL Draft. I think something happened in that draft room where a contingent of people wanted Mac Jones, with another side saying that Jones was too low ceiling and they had to roll the dice on Lance.Nothing about Trey Lance’s skillset upon entering the NFL said he was going to be a good Kyle Shanahan quarterback. A big-arm, small school improviser who needed a couple of seasons to learn the NFL game didn’t vibe with the “win now” mode the Niners were in when they looked for a QB upgrade. Of course they totally got bailed out by finding Brock Purdy, but that doesn’t change what a monumental bust taking Trey Lance was.San Francisco gave up No. 12, a 1st in 2o22, a 3rd in 2022, and a 1st in 2023 to move up and get Lance, who was later sent away for a 4th round pick two years later.No. 8: Ki-Jana Carter, RB — No.1 overall, Cincinnati Bengals (1995)It’s not often you have a draft pick who was so bad that they threw shade on an entire football program, but Ki-Jana Carter is a huge part of the Penn State NFL Draft stigma that lasted the better part of two decades. An absolute phenom for the Nittany Lions, Carter turned into a pumpkin the second he arrived in the NFL — going from amassing over 1,500 yards and 23 touchdowns on 7.8 yards-per-carry, to getting hurt, then taking four years to reach 700 rushing yards.Four Hall of Fame players were taken after Carter in the first round of 1995 (Tony Boselli, Warren Sapp, Ty Law, and Derrick Brooks). The team also passed on Steve McNair and Joey Galloway. It was a legendarily bad pick that kept Penn State away from the top pick for YEARS and turned the school into a meme.No. 7: Rich Campbell, QB — No. 6 overall, Green Bay Packers (1981)It was a different world when it came to picking quarterbacks back in 1981. In short: Nobody had any idea what the hell they were doing. The Packers took Campbell with the No. 6 overall pick, and the coaching staff hated him. Despite being a successful QB at Cal, it became immediately clear that Campbell didn’t have the arm strength to be an NFL quarterback and was extremely limited in the pocket.Campbell did not start a SINGLE GAME for the Packers. In four years he only appeared seven times, and logged 386 yards passing, 3 TDs and 9 INTs on his resume.No. 6: Ryan Leaf, QB — No. 2 overall, San Diego Chargers (1998)A lot of great bust lists will have Ryan Leaf near the top, but I’m here to explain why he’s simply not the absolute WORST. Leaf is given hell because of what he’s not: Namely Peyton Manning, who was taken one pick earlier. While there’s no doubt Leaf was a bust, he’s still not close to the worst QB on this list — as we’ll get to in a little bit.Leaf was abysmal in his rookie season, then got hurt, and we never saw what he could have done in the league. The size, timing, and arm were there — he just went to the wrong place, at the wrong time, and being compared to Peyton Manning made for impossible levels of pressure.No. 5: Tony Mandarich, OT — No. 2 overall, Green Bay Packers (1989)What happens when your entire college resume is fake? This list is littered with missed evaluations, but the Packers truly had no way of knowing that Tony Mandarich was one of the biggest fakes in draft history.Mandarich made a career for himself at Michigan State by completely obliterating everyone in his path. It looked like a God playing against mortals, and that was because Mandarich was on an immense amount of steroids for his entire college career. He had to quit his cheating regimen upon entering the NFL due to fears of getting caught, and it became immediately apparent that Mandarich had almost no skills to play professional football.What makes this pick hurt so, so much more is that immediately after Mandarich we had three of the greatest NFL players of all time picked immediately after him: Barry Sanders, Derrick Thomas, and Deion Sanders.No. 4: Akili Smith, QB — No. 3 overall, Cincinnati Bengals (1999)This is what happens when desperation for a position takes over the draft process entirely. Akili Smith had really good final season at Oregon, but he was still the third-best QB prospect in 1999 behind Tim Couch (lol) and Donovan McNabb. Smith was ass from the second he stepped on the field. There were physical traits, but he had no work ethic, and was entirely engineered to be a high draft pick, not a successful NFL player.Akili Smith was difficult to coach, couldn’t read the field, made bad decisions, and had horrible accuracy. There was essentially nothing he did well, and it hurts so, so much more with the information that Mike Ditka and the New Orleans Saints offered the Bengals NINE DRAFT PICKS to move up from No. 12 to No. 3 so they could get Ricky Williams.The Bengals were so sold on Smith that they gave up two years of compensation for him, and he provided them with nothing.No. 3: Robert Gallery, OT — No. 2 overall, Oakland Raiders (2004)Robert Gallery is fairly unique on this list that everyone thought this was a home run pick. Gallery was a completely dominant 6-7, 325 tackle with ideal size, great technique, and a pedigree at Iowa that seemed to indicate that he could compete against top talent.When he hit the league, everything just went up in smoke. Gallery struggled against speed rushers, which were in favor league-wide, and couldn’t handle any NFL pass rush moves off the edge. He had limited success after being moved inside to guard, but that never made up for the bust he was.There’s an alternate multiverse where the Raiders take Philip Rivers at No. 2 and avoid making the biggest bust in NFL history, who we’ll talk about in a moment.No. 2: Art Schlichter, QB — No. 4 overall, Baltimore Colts (1982)Here’s someone you rarely ever see mentioned in bust lists, but hoo boy does Art Schlichter belong.We’ve established that QB evaluation in the early 1980s was already bad, but Schlichter was on a whole other level. He was overblown because of an Ohio State offense engineered specifically to his skills and was utterly unable to pivot to learning a new offense. When he arrived at Colts camp Schlichter was out of shape, he had a bad work ethic, and despite being the No. 4 overall pick he lost the starting job to Colts 4th round pick at QB Mike Pagel.Schlichter blew his entire rookie salary on gambling, falling deep into addiction, betting on basketball. He was out of the league in four years with 3 TDs and 11 INTs — with just over 1,000 yards passing and 45% completion.No. 1: Jamarcus Russell, QB — No. 1 overall, Oakland Raiders (2007)Then there was one. Statistically there have been much worse quarterbacks, but by 2007 teams should have had a better idea how to evaluate quarterbacks. Russell had red flags all over him, yet Oakland felt the need to take him because of his physical skillset and desperation at quarterback.Russell was a bad worker, he didn’t study enough and was a liability every time he was on the field. This was made so much worse by the fact that Calvin Johnson and Joe Thomas were taken right after Russell.There are so many pivot points that can change a team’s future, but if we just look at the picks the Raiders ended up making they could have had Philip Rivers in 2004, and Joe Thomas in 2007. Instead they got Gallery and Russell.  #NFL #Drafts #biggest #busts #history

NFL Draft’s 10 biggest busts in history

It’s time to dive into a list nobody wants to see their team on. An NFL Draft bust can happen due to a variety of factors: Sometimes it’s completely botching the process and selecting a player with mammoth red flags, perhaps it’s due to drafting out of desperation which leads to a wasted pick, or on occasion you might take the right player, but select them at the wrong time for a franchise — causing them to bust for one team, then have success elsewhere due to a better fit.

For a draft bust to be truly legendary, there needs to be a mixture of high stakes and the lowest possible return. It also helps if by selecting the player your team missed out on a generational, transformative talent. There will be no shortage of these stories on the list either.

No. 10: Charles Rodgers, WR — No. 2 overall, Detroit Lions (2003)

Everything pointed to Charles Rodgers being an absolute stud in the NFL, and being College Football’s top receiver from Michigan State, going to the Lions — well, it felt like a dream. Instead everything turned into a nightmare, with Rodgers breaking his clavicle during his rookie year which began a downward spiral.

Allowed to leave the team to rehab from his injury, demons from Rodgers’ past swallowed him whole. Off-field concerns prior to the draft dominated the rest of his short-lived NFL career, as Rodgers was suspended three times for violating the NFL’s substance abuse policy in two years. He was cut in 2006 giving the Lions 440 total receiving yards.

The player taken one spot after him: Hall of Fame receiver Andre Johnson.

No. 9: Trey Lance, QB — No. 3 overall, San Francisco 49ers (2021)

To this day I refuse to believe the 49ers traded up with the intention of taking Trey Lance in the 2021 NFL Draft. I think something happened in that draft room where a contingent of people wanted Mac Jones, with another side saying that Jones was too low ceiling and they had to roll the dice on Lance.

Nothing about Trey Lance’s skillset upon entering the NFL said he was going to be a good Kyle Shanahan quarterback. A big-arm, small school improviser who needed a couple of seasons to learn the NFL game didn’t vibe with the “win now” mode the Niners were in when they looked for a QB upgrade. Of course they totally got bailed out by finding Brock Purdy, but that doesn’t change what a monumental bust taking Trey Lance was.

San Francisco gave up No. 12, a 1st in 2o22, a 3rd in 2022, and a 1st in 2023 to move up and get Lance, who was later sent away for a 4th round pick two years later.

No. 8: Ki-Jana Carter, RB — No.1 overall, Cincinnati Bengals (1995)

It’s not often you have a draft pick who was so bad that they threw shade on an entire football program, but Ki-Jana Carter is a huge part of the Penn State NFL Draft stigma that lasted the better part of two decades. An absolute phenom for the Nittany Lions, Carter turned into a pumpkin the second he arrived in the NFL — going from amassing over 1,500 yards and 23 touchdowns on 7.8 yards-per-carry, to getting hurt, then taking four years to reach 700 rushing yards.

Four Hall of Fame players were taken after Carter in the first round of 1995 (Tony Boselli, Warren Sapp, Ty Law, and Derrick Brooks). The team also passed on Steve McNair and Joey Galloway. It was a legendarily bad pick that kept Penn State away from the top pick for YEARS and turned the school into a meme.

No. 7: Rich Campbell, QB — No. 6 overall, Green Bay Packers (1981)

It was a different world when it came to picking quarterbacks back in 1981. In short: Nobody had any idea what the hell they were doing. The Packers took Campbell with the No. 6 overall pick, and the coaching staff hated him. Despite being a successful QB at Cal, it became immediately clear that Campbell didn’t have the arm strength to be an NFL quarterback and was extremely limited in the pocket.

Campbell did not start a SINGLE GAME for the Packers. In four years he only appeared seven times, and logged 386 yards passing, 3 TDs and 9 INTs on his resume.

No. 6: Ryan Leaf, QB — No. 2 overall, San Diego Chargers (1998)

A lot of great bust lists will have Ryan Leaf near the top, but I’m here to explain why he’s simply not the absolute WORST. Leaf is given hell because of what he’s not: Namely Peyton Manning, who was taken one pick earlier. While there’s no doubt Leaf was a bust, he’s still not close to the worst QB on this list — as we’ll get to in a little bit.

Leaf was abysmal in his rookie season, then got hurt, and we never saw what he could have done in the league. The size, timing, and arm were there — he just went to the wrong place, at the wrong time, and being compared to Peyton Manning made for impossible levels of pressure.

No. 5: Tony Mandarich, OT — No. 2 overall, Green Bay Packers (1989)

What happens when your entire college resume is fake? This list is littered with missed evaluations, but the Packers truly had no way of knowing that Tony Mandarich was one of the biggest fakes in draft history.

Mandarich made a career for himself at Michigan State by completely obliterating everyone in his path. It looked like a God playing against mortals, and that was because Mandarich was on an immense amount of steroids for his entire college career. He had to quit his cheating regimen upon entering the NFL due to fears of getting caught, and it became immediately apparent that Mandarich had almost no skills to play professional football.

What makes this pick hurt so, so much more is that immediately after Mandarich we had three of the greatest NFL players of all time picked immediately after him: Barry Sanders, Derrick Thomas, and Deion Sanders.

No. 4: Akili Smith, QB — No. 3 overall, Cincinnati Bengals (1999)

This is what happens when desperation for a position takes over the draft process entirely. Akili Smith had really good final season at Oregon, but he was still the third-best QB prospect in 1999 behind Tim Couch (lol) and Donovan McNabb. Smith was ass from the second he stepped on the field. There were physical traits, but he had no work ethic, and was entirely engineered to be a high draft pick, not a successful NFL player.

Akili Smith was difficult to coach, couldn’t read the field, made bad decisions, and had horrible accuracy. There was essentially nothing he did well, and it hurts so, so much more with the information that Mike Ditka and the New Orleans Saints offered the Bengals NINE DRAFT PICKS to move up from No. 12 to No. 3 so they could get Ricky Williams.

The Bengals were so sold on Smith that they gave up two years of compensation for him, and he provided them with nothing.

No. 3: Robert Gallery, OT — No. 2 overall, Oakland Raiders (2004)

Robert Gallery is fairly unique on this list that everyone thought this was a home run pick. Gallery was a completely dominant 6-7, 325 tackle with ideal size, great technique, and a pedigree at Iowa that seemed to indicate that he could compete against top talent.

When he hit the league, everything just went up in smoke. Gallery struggled against speed rushers, which were in favor league-wide, and couldn’t handle any NFL pass rush moves off the edge. He had limited success after being moved inside to guard, but that never made up for the bust he was.

There’s an alternate multiverse where the Raiders take Philip Rivers at No. 2 and avoid making the biggest bust in NFL history, who we’ll talk about in a moment.

No. 2: Art Schlichter, QB — No. 4 overall, Baltimore Colts (1982)

Here’s someone you rarely ever see mentioned in bust lists, but hoo boy does Art Schlichter belong.

We’ve established that QB evaluation in the early 1980s was already bad, but Schlichter was on a whole other level. He was overblown because of an Ohio State offense engineered specifically to his skills and was utterly unable to pivot to learning a new offense. When he arrived at Colts camp Schlichter was out of shape, he had a bad work ethic, and despite being the No. 4 overall pick he lost the starting job to Colts 4th round pick at QB Mike Pagel.

Schlichter blew his entire rookie salary on gambling, falling deep into addiction, betting on basketball. He was out of the league in four years with 3 TDs and 11 INTs — with just over 1,000 yards passing and 45% completion.

No. 1: Jamarcus Russell, QB — No. 1 overall, Oakland Raiders (2007)

Then there was one. Statistically there have been much worse quarterbacks, but by 2007 teams should have had a better idea how to evaluate quarterbacks. Russell had red flags all over him, yet Oakland felt the need to take him because of his physical skillset and desperation at quarterback.

Russell was a bad worker, he didn’t study enough and was a liability every time he was on the field. This was made so much worse by the fact that Calvin Johnson and Joe Thomas were taken right after Russell.

There are so many pivot points that can change a team’s future, but if we just look at the picks the Raiders ended up making they could have had Philip Rivers in 2004, and Joe Thomas in 2007. Instead they got Gallery and Russell.

#NFL #Drafts #biggest #busts #history

It’s time to dive into a list nobody wants to see their team on. An NFL Draft bust can happen due to a variety of factors: Sometimes it’s completely botching the process and selecting a player with mammoth red flags, perhaps it’s due to drafting out of desperation which leads to a wasted pick, or on occasion you might take the right player, but select them at the wrong time for a franchise — causing them to bust for one team, then have success elsewhere due to a better fit.

For a draft bust to be truly legendary, there needs to be a mixture of high stakes and the lowest possible return. It also helps if by selecting the player your team missed out on a generational, transformative talent. There will be no shortage of these stories on the list either.

No. 10: Charles Rodgers, WR — No. 2 overall, Detroit Lions (2003)

Everything pointed to Charles Rodgers being an absolute stud in the NFL, and being College Football’s top receiver from Michigan State, going to the Lions — well, it felt like a dream. Instead everything turned into a nightmare, with Rodgers breaking his clavicle during his rookie year which began a downward spiral.

Allowed to leave the team to rehab from his injury, demons from Rodgers’ past swallowed him whole. Off-field concerns prior to the draft dominated the rest of his short-lived NFL career, as Rodgers was suspended three times for violating the NFL’s substance abuse policy in two years. He was cut in 2006 giving the Lions 440 total receiving yards.

The player taken one spot after him: Hall of Fame receiver Andre Johnson.

No. 9: Trey Lance, QB — No. 3 overall, San Francisco 49ers (2021)

To this day I refuse to believe the 49ers traded up with the intention of taking Trey Lance in the 2021 NFL Draft. I think something happened in that draft room where a contingent of people wanted Mac Jones, with another side saying that Jones was too low ceiling and they had to roll the dice on Lance.

Nothing about Trey Lance’s skillset upon entering the NFL said he was going to be a good Kyle Shanahan quarterback. A big-arm, small school improviser who needed a couple of seasons to learn the NFL game didn’t vibe with the “win now” mode the Niners were in when they looked for a QB upgrade. Of course they totally got bailed out by finding Brock Purdy, but that doesn’t change what a monumental bust taking Trey Lance was.

San Francisco gave up No. 12, a 1st in 2o22, a 3rd in 2022, and a 1st in 2023 to move up and get Lance, who was later sent away for a 4th round pick two years later.

No. 8: Ki-Jana Carter, RB — No.1 overall, Cincinnati Bengals (1995)

It’s not often you have a draft pick who was so bad that they threw shade on an entire football program, but Ki-Jana Carter is a huge part of the Penn State NFL Draft stigma that lasted the better part of two decades. An absolute phenom for the Nittany Lions, Carter turned into a pumpkin the second he arrived in the NFL — going from amassing over 1,500 yards and 23 touchdowns on 7.8 yards-per-carry, to getting hurt, then taking four years to reach 700 rushing yards.

Four Hall of Fame players were taken after Carter in the first round of 1995 (Tony Boselli, Warren Sapp, Ty Law, and Derrick Brooks). The team also passed on Steve McNair and Joey Galloway. It was a legendarily bad pick that kept Penn State away from the top pick for YEARS and turned the school into a meme.

No. 7: Rich Campbell, QB — No. 6 overall, Green Bay Packers (1981)

It was a different world when it came to picking quarterbacks back in 1981. In short: Nobody had any idea what the hell they were doing. The Packers took Campbell with the No. 6 overall pick, and the coaching staff hated him. Despite being a successful QB at Cal, it became immediately clear that Campbell didn’t have the arm strength to be an NFL quarterback and was extremely limited in the pocket.

Campbell did not start a SINGLE GAME for the Packers. In four years he only appeared seven times, and logged 386 yards passing, 3 TDs and 9 INTs on his resume.

No. 6: Ryan Leaf, QB — No. 2 overall, San Diego Chargers (1998)

A lot of great bust lists will have Ryan Leaf near the top, but I’m here to explain why he’s simply not the absolute WORST. Leaf is given hell because of what he’s not: Namely Peyton Manning, who was taken one pick earlier. While there’s no doubt Leaf was a bust, he’s still not close to the worst QB on this list — as we’ll get to in a little bit.

Leaf was abysmal in his rookie season, then got hurt, and we never saw what he could have done in the league. The size, timing, and arm were there — he just went to the wrong place, at the wrong time, and being compared to Peyton Manning made for impossible levels of pressure.

No. 5: Tony Mandarich, OT — No. 2 overall, Green Bay Packers (1989)

What happens when your entire college resume is fake? This list is littered with missed evaluations, but the Packers truly had no way of knowing that Tony Mandarich was one of the biggest fakes in draft history.

Mandarich made a career for himself at Michigan State by completely obliterating everyone in his path. It looked like a God playing against mortals, and that was because Mandarich was on an immense amount of steroids for his entire college career. He had to quit his cheating regimen upon entering the NFL due to fears of getting caught, and it became immediately apparent that Mandarich had almost no skills to play professional football.

What makes this pick hurt so, so much more is that immediately after Mandarich we had three of the greatest NFL players of all time picked immediately after him: Barry Sanders, Derrick Thomas, and Deion Sanders.

No. 4: Akili Smith, QB — No. 3 overall, Cincinnati Bengals (1999)

This is what happens when desperation for a position takes over the draft process entirely. Akili Smith had really good final season at Oregon, but he was still the third-best QB prospect in 1999 behind Tim Couch (lol) and Donovan McNabb. Smith was ass from the second he stepped on the field. There were physical traits, but he had no work ethic, and was entirely engineered to be a high draft pick, not a successful NFL player.

Akili Smith was difficult to coach, couldn’t read the field, made bad decisions, and had horrible accuracy. There was essentially nothing he did well, and it hurts so, so much more with the information that Mike Ditka and the New Orleans Saints offered the Bengals NINE DRAFT PICKS to move up from No. 12 to No. 3 so they could get Ricky Williams.

The Bengals were so sold on Smith that they gave up two years of compensation for him, and he provided them with nothing.

No. 3: Robert Gallery, OT — No. 2 overall, Oakland Raiders (2004)

Robert Gallery is fairly unique on this list that everyone thought this was a home run pick. Gallery was a completely dominant 6-7, 325 tackle with ideal size, great technique, and a pedigree at Iowa that seemed to indicate that he could compete against top talent.

When he hit the league, everything just went up in smoke. Gallery struggled against speed rushers, which were in favor league-wide, and couldn’t handle any NFL pass rush moves off the edge. He had limited success after being moved inside to guard, but that never made up for the bust he was.

There’s an alternate multiverse where the Raiders take Philip Rivers at No. 2 and avoid making the biggest bust in NFL history, who we’ll talk about in a moment.

No. 2: Art Schlichter, QB — No. 4 overall, Baltimore Colts (1982)

Here’s someone you rarely ever see mentioned in bust lists, but hoo boy does Art Schlichter belong.

We’ve established that QB evaluation in the early 1980s was already bad, but Schlichter was on a whole other level. He was overblown because of an Ohio State offense engineered specifically to his skills and was utterly unable to pivot to learning a new offense. When he arrived at Colts camp Schlichter was out of shape, he had a bad work ethic, and despite being the No. 4 overall pick he lost the starting job to Colts 4th round pick at QB Mike Pagel.

Schlichter blew his entire rookie salary on gambling, falling deep into addiction, betting on basketball. He was out of the league in four years with 3 TDs and 11 INTs — with just over 1,000 yards passing and 45% completion.

No. 1: Jamarcus Russell, QB — No. 1 overall, Oakland Raiders (2007)

Then there was one. Statistically there have been much worse quarterbacks, but by 2007 teams should have had a better idea how to evaluate quarterbacks. Russell had red flags all over him, yet Oakland felt the need to take him because of his physical skillset and desperation at quarterback.

Russell was a bad worker, he didn’t study enough and was a liability every time he was on the field. This was made so much worse by the fact that Calvin Johnson and Joe Thomas were taken right after Russell.

There are so many pivot points that can change a team’s future, but if we just look at the picks the Raiders ended up making they could have had Philip Rivers in 2004, and Joe Thomas in 2007. Instead they got Gallery and Russell.

Source link
#NFL #Drafts #biggest #busts #history

Deadspin | White Sox playing hard to beat, face challenge from Rangers  Jul 19, 2026; Toronto, Ontario, CAN; Chicago White Sox shortstop Colson Montgomery (12) reacts after his single against the Toronto Blue Jays during the fourth inning  at Rogers Centre. Mandatory Credit: John E. Sokolowski-Imagn Images   Chicago White Sox shortstop Colson Montgomery summed up his team’s mentality in one word after their 3-0 win over the Toronto Blue Jays on Sunday: “Relentlessness.”  That attitude is serving the White Sox well, as they are currently one game up on the Cleveland Guardians for first place in the American League Central after winning five of their last six.  They will look to rely on that same mindset as they begin a three-game set against the AL West-leading Texas Rangers on Monday in Arlington, Texas.  Facing someone Montgomery called “a true competitor” in Blue Jays starter Trey Yesavage on Sunday, the White Sox hitters were ready for a battle at the plate.  “We knew we had to be disciplined with our plan,” Montgomery said.   “We just tried to stay positive,” he added. “And I think we just pulled through.”  Montgomery was a vital part of the 3-0 victory, hitting his team-leading 24th home run off Yesavage in the sixth inning.  There’s no secret ingredient to the surprise turnaround by the White Sox, but Montgomery credits the youth of the team for their day-to-day camaraderie.  “We’re all young, we’re all pretty inexperienced,” he said, “so we’re all just staying together.”  Erick Fedde (5-6, 4.15 ERA) will start for Chicago in Monday’s opener. Fedde’s last appearance came in relief on July 11, but he picked up the win after throwing four shutout innings in a 1-0 win against the visiting Athletics.   Fedde is 0-1 with a 2.70 ERA in three career appearances (two starts) versus the Rangers.  Texas power-hitting outfielder Wyatt Langford, who homered in the team’s 8-5 road loss to Atlanta on Sunday, has been slowed down only by the injury bug in 2026.  Langford has played in only 47 of the Rangers’ 99 games this season due to quad and forearm injuries in April and a hamstring strain in late June, but he’s not allowed the stop-start nature of his availability to throw off his rhythm. Seven of Langford’s 10 homers this season have come in his last 16 games, over which time he’s hitting .368 (25-for-68) with 17 RBIs.  Texas comes home after dropping two of three to the Braves in their first series after the break.  The Rangers will turn to veteran Jacob deGrom (7-5, 3.49) on the mound. The right-hander is coming off a health scare, as he was scratched from his last scheduled start on July 12 with a glute injury. Fortunately for Texas, their ace will avoid a stint on the injured list as he gets ready to face Chicago.  Texas manager Skip Schumaker said he waited to make the decision to start deGrom until he threw a pain-free bullpen session over the weekend, saying, “You want to check every box.”  “His health is good after the break, which is great news,” the manager said.  The last time deGrom took the mound, he had a no-decision in the Rangers’ 8-3 win over the visiting Los Angeles Angels on July 7, giving up two runs and striking out seven in five innings.  The White Sox are one of just five teams that deGrom has not beaten in his 13-year career. A five-time All-Star and two-time winner of the National League Cy Young Award, he has a 0-0 record and 1.80 ERA in three previous starts against Chicago.  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #White #Sox #playing #hard #beat #face #challenge #RangersJul 19, 2026; Toronto, Ontario, CAN; Chicago White Sox shortstop Colson Montgomery (12) reacts after his single against the Toronto Blue Jays during the fourth inning at Rogers Centre. Mandatory Credit: John E. Sokolowski-Imagn Images

Chicago White Sox shortstop Colson Montgomery summed up his team’s mentality in one word after their 3-0 win over the Toronto Blue Jays on Sunday: “Relentlessness.”

That attitude is serving the White Sox well, as they are currently one game up on the Cleveland Guardians for first place in the American League Central after winning five of their last six.

They will look to rely on that same mindset as they begin a three-game set against the AL West-leading Texas Rangers on Monday in Arlington, Texas.

Facing someone Montgomery called “a true competitor” in Blue Jays starter Trey Yesavage on Sunday, the White Sox hitters were ready for a battle at the plate.

“We knew we had to be disciplined with our plan,” Montgomery said.

“We just tried to stay positive,” he added. “And I think we just pulled through.”

Montgomery was a vital part of the 3-0 victory, hitting his team-leading 24th home run off Yesavage in the sixth inning.

There’s no secret ingredient to the surprise turnaround by the White Sox, but Montgomery credits the youth of the team for their day-to-day camaraderie.

“We’re all young, we’re all pretty inexperienced,” he said, “so we’re all just staying together.”


Erick Fedde (5-6, 4.15 ERA) will start for Chicago in Monday’s opener. Fedde’s last appearance came in relief on July 11, but he picked up the win after throwing four shutout innings in a 1-0 win against the visiting Athletics.

Fedde is 0-1 with a 2.70 ERA in three career appearances (two starts) versus the Rangers.

Texas power-hitting outfielder Wyatt Langford, who homered in the team’s 8-5 road loss to Atlanta on Sunday, has been slowed down only by the injury bug in 2026.

Langford has played in only 47 of the Rangers’ 99 games this season due to quad and forearm injuries in April and a hamstring strain in late June, but he’s not allowed the stop-start nature of his availability to throw off his rhythm. Seven of Langford’s 10 homers this season have come in his last 16 games, over which time he’s hitting .368 (25-for-68) with 17 RBIs.

Texas comes home after dropping two of three to the Braves in their first series after the break.

The Rangers will turn to veteran Jacob deGrom (7-5, 3.49) on the mound. The right-hander is coming off a health scare, as he was scratched from his last scheduled start on July 12 with a glute injury. Fortunately for Texas, their ace will avoid a stint on the injured list as he gets ready to face Chicago.

Texas manager Skip Schumaker said he waited to make the decision to start deGrom until he threw a pain-free bullpen session over the weekend, saying, “You want to check every box.”

“His health is good after the break, which is great news,” the manager said.

The last time deGrom took the mound, he had a no-decision in the Rangers’ 8-3 win over the visiting Los Angeles Angels on July 7, giving up two runs and striking out seven in five innings.

The White Sox are one of just five teams that deGrom has not beaten in his 13-year career. A five-time All-Star and two-time winner of the National League Cy Young Award, he has a 0-0 record and 1.80 ERA in three previous starts against Chicago.


–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #White #Sox #playing #hard #beat #face #challenge #Rangers">Deadspin | White Sox playing hard to beat, face challenge from Rangers  Jul 19, 2026; Toronto, Ontario, CAN; Chicago White Sox shortstop Colson Montgomery (12) reacts after his single against the Toronto Blue Jays during the fourth inning  at Rogers Centre. Mandatory Credit: John E. Sokolowski-Imagn Images   Chicago White Sox shortstop Colson Montgomery summed up his team’s mentality in one word after their 3-0 win over the Toronto Blue Jays on Sunday: “Relentlessness.”  That attitude is serving the White Sox well, as they are currently one game up on the Cleveland Guardians for first place in the American League Central after winning five of their last six.  They will look to rely on that same mindset as they begin a three-game set against the AL West-leading Texas Rangers on Monday in Arlington, Texas.  Facing someone Montgomery called “a true competitor” in Blue Jays starter Trey Yesavage on Sunday, the White Sox hitters were ready for a battle at the plate.  “We knew we had to be disciplined with our plan,” Montgomery said.   “We just tried to stay positive,” he added. “And I think we just pulled through.”  Montgomery was a vital part of the 3-0 victory, hitting his team-leading 24th home run off Yesavage in the sixth inning.  There’s no secret ingredient to the surprise turnaround by the White Sox, but Montgomery credits the youth of the team for their day-to-day camaraderie.  “We’re all young, we’re all pretty inexperienced,” he said, “so we’re all just staying together.”  Erick Fedde (5-6, 4.15 ERA) will start for Chicago in Monday’s opener. Fedde’s last appearance came in relief on July 11, but he picked up the win after throwing four shutout innings in a 1-0 win against the visiting Athletics.   Fedde is 0-1 with a 2.70 ERA in three career appearances (two starts) versus the Rangers.  Texas power-hitting outfielder Wyatt Langford, who homered in the team’s 8-5 road loss to Atlanta on Sunday, has been slowed down only by the injury bug in 2026.  Langford has played in only 47 of the Rangers’ 99 games this season due to quad and forearm injuries in April and a hamstring strain in late June, but he’s not allowed the stop-start nature of his availability to throw off his rhythm. Seven of Langford’s 10 homers this season have come in his last 16 games, over which time he’s hitting .368 (25-for-68) with 17 RBIs.  Texas comes home after dropping two of three to the Braves in their first series after the break.  The Rangers will turn to veteran Jacob deGrom (7-5, 3.49) on the mound. The right-hander is coming off a health scare, as he was scratched from his last scheduled start on July 12 with a glute injury. Fortunately for Texas, their ace will avoid a stint on the injured list as he gets ready to face Chicago.  Texas manager Skip Schumaker said he waited to make the decision to start deGrom until he threw a pain-free bullpen session over the weekend, saying, “You want to check every box.”  “His health is good after the break, which is great news,” the manager said.  The last time deGrom took the mound, he had a no-decision in the Rangers’ 8-3 win over the visiting Los Angeles Angels on July 7, giving up two runs and striking out seven in five innings.  The White Sox are one of just five teams that deGrom has not beaten in his 13-year career. A five-time All-Star and two-time winner of the National League Cy Young Award, he has a 0-0 record and 1.80 ERA in three previous starts against Chicago.  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #White #Sox #playing #hard #beat #face #challenge #Rangers

NBA Summer League is never going to make or break the career of an incoming rookie. A year ago, Cooper Flagg shot 5-of-21 from the floor in his Las Vegas debut, and failed to make my annual list of the most impressive rookies in summer league. It’s important to tell yourself not to overreact to everything you see.

The good news for this year’s rookie class is that most of the top picks absolutely delivered on the hype. AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, Cameron Boozer, and Caleb Wilson each had flashes of brilliance that showed why the 2026 draft class was so highly regarded. Read my story on six rookies who looked underwhelming in summer league this year, but remember there’s plenty of time for them to turn things around. Jalen Brunson wasn’t very good in summer league, either.

Check out my list of the young veterans already proving to be too good for summer league this year. Now, let’s rank the most impressive rookies in Las Vegas. Apologies to Koa Peat, Labaron Philon, Cam Carr, Chris Cenac, Mikel Brown Jr., Henri Veesar, and Jack Kayil, who were all really good in their own right, but these 11 players stuck out.

11. Hannes Steinbach, F, Charlotte Hornets

Steinbach finally moved into the Hornets’ starting lineup for their fourth summer league game, and immediately showed all the things that made him special. He’s such an effective finisher (67.9% true shooting) in part because he catches everything thrown his way, and can often play through contact on his way to the basket. Steinbach’s elite hands also make him the best rebounder in this draft class, and at this point it’s possible he could be one of the best offensive rebounders in the league as a rookie after posting a comical 18.15% o-board rate in Las Vegas. His defense and three-point shooting remain a work in progress, but Steinbach is great at what he’s good at, and that should give him a foundation for success as he continues to work on his skill set over the years.

10. Bruce Thornton, G, Houston Rockets

Summer league was never going to be a big challenge for an elite college veteran like Thornton, and indeed he looked comfortable and confident from the moment he hit the floor in Vegas. Thornton has a big body for a shorter point guard, and he throws around his weight to open up offensive opportunities for himself and his teammates. He’s become a really good high-volume three-point shooter over the years, and in summer league he made 43 percent from deep on seven attempts per game. He also posted a 2:1 assist-to-turnover ratio, which is par for the course after a college career where he rarely coughed it up. There will be questions about his defense when it’s time for the real season, but Thornton has so much command over the offense and his own scoring ability that he feels like an obvious bet to be the next second-round draft hit.

9. Morez Johnson, F, Dallas Mavericks

Johnson is an absolute hoss as a 250+ pound forward with a 7’3.5 wingspan, and he’s a truly ridiculous athlete for someone with that size. The Mavs’ No. 9 overall pick hit the ground running in Vegas by doing what he does best: finishing efficiently inside, cleaning the defensive glass, and showing a rare combination of quickness and power on defense to give him premium matchup versatility. Johnson still scored a lot of his points on dump-offs and putbacks in Las Vegas, but there were also flashes of freight train drives to the hoop and short mid-range shotmaking that weren’t as prevalent on the college tape. His 69.1% true shooting in two games is about as good as it gets. Johnson’s simple-yet-effective offense set is complemented by a more wide-ranging defensive skill set, where he can protect the rim on the backline or switch onto quicker wings or guards and stick with them for a few seconds on the perimeter. He’s going to be an enforcer next to Cooper Flagg in Dallas from day one, and if his handle and shooting keeps developing, he has the potential to be a lot more than that.

8. Allen Graves, F, Toronto Raptors

Anyone who thought the sixth man from Santa Clara whose draft candidacy was spawned by some young online nerds was going to crash and fail in the league sure looks like they’re going to be proven wrong. Graves did his thing with disruptive defense, impressive rebounding, and a sweet three-point stroke. It seems like Graves couldn’t show the full extent of his offensive game in college, because in Las Vegas he was handling the ball on drives and initiating the pick-and-roll with a level of effectiveness that wasn’t on the Santa Clara tape. Meanwhile, Graves continues to be a monster at forcing takeaways with great hands and an elite nose for the ball. His defense is so aggressive that it’s almost easy to overlook that he shoots such an easy ball from three-point range, knocking down 44% from deep in 16 attempts. I’m already worried I had Graves too low on my board at No. 19, which is exactly where the Raptors picked him. He looks like a steal. Toronto should be feeling really good about this one so far.

7. Yaxel Lendeborg, F, Golden State Warriors

Lendeborg should have been really good in summer league considering he’s already almost 24 years old, an age when most players have graduated out of this setting. Still, it was encouraging to see the former Michigan star dominate in all the ways we’ve come to expect, showing bully-ball drives, sharp connective passing, stout defense, and a sweet three-point stroke. The shooting is the headliner from Lendeborg’s five games in summer league: he hit 56.5% of his threes on the way to immaculate 68% true shooting. He also bumped Cameron Boozer to hell on one drive to the rim, and showed his ability to play through contact on both ends. I like his defensive rebounding and his ball movement, but there were some instances where his lack of agility in the middle of the floor hurt his two-point scoring efficiency. I had Yaxel at No. 5 on my board entering the draft, and he seems like he’s going to be a perfect fit in Golden State, especially if the threes keep dropping. .

6. Darryn Peterson, G, Utah Jazz

Peterson gets off his shot so easily. The No. 2 overall pick glides into stepback jumpers, turns the corner on drives to the rim, and sprints off screens to knock down threes so effortlessly that he just looks like an NBA All-Star. Peterson had some spectacular moments with a driving poster dunk against the Clippers, and some flashes of the defensive playmaking that separates him from other elite offensive guards, but he also still has some fat to trim in his game. Peterson made some puzzling decisions with the ball whether he was settling for floaters or giving it away to the defense. He doesn’t really look like a true point guard (he finished with 26 assists to 24 turnovers through five summer league games), but that should be no big deal for a Jazz team that already has Keyonte George in the backcourt. His skill set still needs some fine-tuning, but Peterson’s talent jumps off the screen, and best of all, he wasn’t slowed down by any of the weird cramping issues that plagued him in college. He’s going to be a highly productive rookie, and a major contributor to what should be a pretty good Utah team this season.

5. Meleek Thomas, G, Cleveland Cavaliers

The long history of John Calipari guards being better in the NBA than in college might have another addition with Meleek Thomas. Thomas had a solid freshman year at Arkansas, but still slipped to the No. 34 overall pick because of concerns about his frame and defensive projection. The sell was always his bucket-getting, and he basically looked unstoppable in his three games in Las Vegas. Thomas scored 85 points in 90 minutes on excellent 65.7% true shooting through three games in summer league, slicing and dicing through opposing defenses at will and splashing shots all over the court. He hit 45.8% of his threes, all of his free throws, and had no problem breaking free from the ball pressure that frustrated other guards. Thomas avoided tunnel vision despite the incredible scoring numbers, and did a good job finding teammates while avoiding mistakes with 13 assists to five turnovers. With elite quickness, a money jumper, and a pretty good feel for the game, Thomas already looks like a second round steal, and someone who should make Cavs fans very excited for his future.

4. AJ Dybantsa, F, Washington Wizards

Dybantsa’s elite slashing and tough shot-making were fully on display in his two-game run in Las Vegas. The No. 1 overall pick is an absolute giant for a wing, but unlike most players his size, he already has the ball on a string. Dybantsa can turn the corner on most defenders, but when he’s shut off, he has plenty of counters to continue probing the defense until he can break free. Dybantsa’s mid-range heavy shot-selection is already drawing some consternation, but it’s hard to get too upset when he still posted blistering 63.8% true shooting despite shooting 1-of-11 from three-point range. That’s just what Dybantsa provides, relentless attacking that will keep hammering holes in the defense until he finally makes a crack. With the caveat that it’s only summer league, Dybantsa’s defense also looked much better than it did at BYU with a 26.6% defensive rebound rate, 5% steal rate, and 5.4% block rate. He’s going to need to be able to play off the ball a little bit more next to Trae Young during the regular season, but for now Dybantsa showed the special skills that made him the first pick in a loaded draft.

3. Caleb Wilson, F, Chicago Bulls

Caleb Wilson answered his biggest question on his very first shot in Las Vegas. Wilson took a pitch from teammate Noa Essengue, drew a switch from the defense, and took one dribble before splashing a three-pointer from the top of the key. Wilson didn’t shoot much in college, which makes sense for a player who used his best-in-class explosiveness to crush 67 dunks in just 24 games. The tape was filled with tough shot-making from mid-range, but those jump shots rarely extended behind the arc. In his summer league debut, Wilson drained seven three-pointers — the same number he made all season at North Carolina. Wilson had five months off since suffering a season-ending broken thumb in his right hand, and he clearly made the most of his time by reportedly getting up 2,000 threes per day. It takes most top prospects years to address the biggest holes in their scouting report, if they ever do it at all. Wilson already proved he’s going to shoot threes as a rookie, and that’s a great sign for his long-term development as a shooter. Read my feature on Wilson’s quest for greatness here.

A study by Owen Phillips showed that three-point rate (percentage of field goal attempts from three) is the “stickiest” stat of summer league — the one that carries over the best to the regular season. Well, Wilson moved his three-point rate from 9.1% at UNC to 47.1% for the Summer Bulls. It feels like a thrilling development for Wilson because so many other aspects of his game are already so strong. Wilson’s defensive playmaking is outstanding, and he amassed an 8.5% block rate in Vegas with a number of impressive stuffs, including a chasedown block for the ages. He hit the offensive glass at a higher rate than Cam Boozer (9.1% offensive rebound rate), and finished well when he was set up by his teammates. His poster thrunk against the Jazz was one of the most athletic plays you will ever see. There were still two big negatives for Wilson: his terrible free throw stroke (6-of-18 from the line) and his bad turnover habit, with his giveaways (21) easily outpacing his assists (7). The assist-to-turnover ratio was a positive on his college stat sheet, but that was mostly on stationary reads, and not live dribbles. Wilson was already a great prospect, but after watching him in Las Vegas, it seems possible he’s leveling up at a terrifying rate.

2. Cameron Boozer, F, Memphis Grizzlies

Cameron Boozer’s game has always been defined by steady production that won’t knock your socks off until his team wins and he finishes with monstrous box score numbers. Boozer did it again in this setting despite being one of the youngest players at summer league in his last few days as an 18-year-old. His scoring efficiency was remarkable by shooting 53.7% on two-pointers, 45% on three-pointers, and 80% on free throws for 65.8% true shooting. He continued to clean the defensive glass (18.7% defensive rebound rate), and he looked pretty quick laterally on that end even if he’s not offering much rim protection. Boozer looked a bit thinner in Vegas compared to the bulkier frame he carried at Duke, and it feels like he’s still learning how to use it. He’s not the most nimble player in the middle of the floor, but it doesn’t really matter because his passing vision is excellent and he almost always makes the right decision on time. Boozer’s top-4 contemporaries had flashier highlights, but his team impact was as great as any player in Vegas. I had Boozer as the top player in the 2026 draft in his own tier, and I think summer league only strengthened that argument.

1. Brayden Burries, G, Milwaukee Bucks

Burries’ upside was up for debate as he entered the 2026 NBA Draft, but he looked like an elite connective piece on both ends of the floor during his run in Las Vegas. He shot the hell out of the ball by hitting 44% of his threes, he hit the glass hard and forced takeaways on defense, and made smart decisions every time the ball touched his hands. Burries’ floor spacing and quick trigger from three helps fill in the gaps in the halfcourt in any lineup, but he also showed an ability to use his scoring to find open passing windows to teammates (12 assists) while suppressing turnovers (only one in three games in Vegas). Burries would be a valuable player even if he was just average defensively, but he looks better than that. His 4.2% steal rate and 3.7% block rate in Vegas are excellent numbers for a guard, and the fact that he’s such a good transition player once he yanks the ball away only makes him more effective. I only had Burries at No. 16 on my final board, so he exceeded my expectations more than any player in Las Vegas. The Bucks don’t have to try to shoehorn him into being a lead creator with Ryan Rollins and Tyler Herro on the roster; instead, he can be the ultimate backcourt sidekick who allows everyone else to be the best version of themselves while maximizing his own efficiency.

#NBAs #rookies #Las #Vegas #Summer #League #ranked">NBA’s 11 best rookies in Las Vegas Summer League, ranked  NBA Summer League is never going to make or break the career of an incoming rookie. A year ago, Cooper Flagg shot 5-of-21 from the floor in his Las Vegas debut, and failed to make my annual list of the most impressive rookies in summer league. It’s important to tell yourself not to overreact to everything you see.The good news for this year’s rookie class is that most of the top picks absolutely delivered on the hype. AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, Cameron Boozer, and Caleb Wilson each had flashes of brilliance that showed why the 2026 draft class was so highly regarded. Read my story on six rookies who looked underwhelming in summer league this year, but remember there’s plenty of time for them to turn things around. Jalen Brunson wasn’t very good in summer league, either.Check out my list of the young veterans already proving to be too good for summer league this year. Now, let’s rank the most impressive rookies in Las Vegas. Apologies to Koa Peat, Labaron Philon, Cam Carr, Chris Cenac, Mikel Brown Jr., Henri Veesar, and Jack Kayil, who were all really good in their own right, but these 11 players stuck out.11. Hannes Steinbach, F, Charlotte HornetsSteinbach finally moved into the Hornets’ starting lineup for their fourth summer league game, and immediately showed all the things that made him special. He’s such an effective finisher (67.9% true shooting) in part because he catches everything thrown his way, and can often play through contact on his way to the basket. Steinbach’s elite hands also make him the best rebounder in this draft class, and at this point it’s possible he could be one of the best offensive rebounders in the league as a rookie after posting a comical 18.15% o-board rate in Las Vegas. His defense and three-point shooting remain a work in progress, but Steinbach is great at what he’s good at, and that should give him a foundation for success as he continues to work on his skill set over the years.10. Bruce Thornton, G, Houston RocketsSummer league was never going to be a big challenge for an elite college veteran like Thornton, and indeed he looked comfortable and confident from the moment he hit the floor in Vegas. Thornton has a big body for a shorter point guard, and he throws around his weight to open up offensive opportunities for himself and his teammates. He’s become a really good high-volume three-point shooter over the years, and in summer league he made 43 percent from deep on seven attempts per game. He also posted a 2:1 assist-to-turnover ratio, which is par for the course after a college career where he rarely coughed it up. There will be questions about his defense when it’s time for the real season, but Thornton has so much command over the offense and his own scoring ability that he feels like an obvious bet to be the next second-round draft hit.9. Morez Johnson, F, Dallas MavericksJohnson is an absolute hoss as a 250+ pound forward with a 7’3.5 wingspan, and he’s a truly ridiculous athlete for someone with that size. The Mavs’ No. 9 overall pick hit the ground running in Vegas by doing what he does best: finishing efficiently inside, cleaning the defensive glass, and showing a rare combination of quickness and power on defense to give him premium matchup versatility. Johnson still scored a lot of his points on dump-offs and putbacks in Las Vegas, but there were also flashes of freight train drives to the hoop and short mid-range shotmaking that weren’t as prevalent on the college tape. His 69.1% true shooting in two games is about as good as it gets. Johnson’s simple-yet-effective offense set is complemented by a more wide-ranging defensive skill set, where he can protect the rim on the backline or switch onto quicker wings or guards and stick with them for a few seconds on the perimeter. He’s going to be an enforcer next to Cooper Flagg in Dallas from day one, and if his handle and shooting keeps developing, he has the potential to be a lot more than that.8. Allen Graves, F, Toronto RaptorsAnyone who thought the sixth man from Santa Clara whose draft candidacy was spawned by some young online nerds was going to crash and fail in the league sure looks like they’re going to be proven wrong. Graves did his thing with disruptive defense, impressive rebounding, and a sweet three-point stroke. It seems like Graves couldn’t show the full extent of his offensive game in college, because in Las Vegas he was handling the ball on drives and initiating the pick-and-roll with a level of effectiveness that wasn’t on the Santa Clara tape. Meanwhile, Graves continues to be a monster at forcing takeaways with great hands and an elite nose for the ball. His defense is so aggressive that it’s almost easy to overlook that he shoots such an easy ball from three-point range, knocking down 44% from deep in 16 attempts. I’m already worried I had Graves too low on my board at No. 19, which is exactly where the Raptors picked him. He looks like a steal. Toronto should be feeling really good about this one so far.7. Yaxel Lendeborg, F, Golden State WarriorsLendeborg should have been really good in summer league considering he’s already almost 24 years old, an age when most players have graduated out of this setting. Still, it was encouraging to see the former Michigan star dominate in all the ways we’ve come to expect, showing bully-ball drives, sharp connective passing, stout defense, and a sweet three-point stroke. The shooting is the headliner from Lendeborg’s five games in summer league: he hit 56.5% of his threes on the way to immaculate 68% true shooting. He also bumped Cameron Boozer to hell on one drive to the rim, and showed his ability to play through contact on both ends. I like his defensive rebounding and his ball movement, but there were some instances where his lack of agility in the middle of the floor hurt his two-point scoring efficiency. I had Yaxel at No. 5 on my board entering the draft, and he seems like he’s going to be a perfect fit in Golden State, especially if the threes keep dropping. .6. Darryn Peterson, G, Utah JazzPeterson gets off his shot so easily. The No. 2 overall pick glides into stepback jumpers, turns the corner on drives to the rim, and sprints off screens to knock down threes so effortlessly that he just looks like an NBA All-Star. Peterson had some spectacular moments with a driving poster dunk against the Clippers, and some flashes of the defensive playmaking that separates him from other elite offensive guards, but he also still has some fat to trim in his game. Peterson made some puzzling decisions with the ball whether he was settling for floaters or giving it away to the defense. He doesn’t really look like a true point guard (he finished with 26 assists to 24 turnovers through five summer league games), but that should be no big deal for a Jazz team that already has Keyonte George in the backcourt. His skill set still needs some fine-tuning, but Peterson’s talent jumps off the screen, and best of all, he wasn’t slowed down by any of the weird cramping issues that plagued him in college. He’s going to be a highly productive rookie, and a major contributor to what should be a pretty good Utah team this season.5. Meleek Thomas, G, Cleveland CavaliersThe long history of John Calipari guards being better in the NBA than in college might have another addition with Meleek Thomas. Thomas had a solid freshman year at Arkansas, but still slipped to the No. 34 overall pick because of concerns about his frame and defensive projection. The sell was always his bucket-getting, and he basically looked unstoppable in his three games in Las Vegas. Thomas scored 85 points in 90 minutes on excellent 65.7% true shooting through three games in summer league, slicing and dicing through opposing defenses at will and splashing shots all over the court. He hit 45.8% of his threes, all of his free throws, and had no problem breaking free from the ball pressure that frustrated other guards. Thomas avoided tunnel vision despite the incredible scoring numbers, and did a good job finding teammates while avoiding mistakes with 13 assists to five turnovers. With elite quickness, a money jumper, and a pretty good feel for the game, Thomas already looks like a second round steal, and someone who should make Cavs fans very excited for his future.4. AJ Dybantsa, F, Washington WizardsDybantsa’s elite slashing and tough shot-making were fully on display in his two-game run in Las Vegas. The No. 1 overall pick is an absolute giant for a wing, but unlike most players his size, he already has the ball on a string. Dybantsa can turn the corner on most defenders, but when he’s shut off, he has plenty of counters to continue probing the defense until he can break free. Dybantsa’s mid-range heavy shot-selection is already drawing some consternation, but it’s hard to get too upset when he still posted blistering 63.8% true shooting despite shooting 1-of-11 from three-point range. That’s just what Dybantsa provides, relentless attacking that will keep hammering holes in the defense until he finally makes a crack. With the caveat that it’s only summer league, Dybantsa’s defense also looked much better than it did at BYU with a 26.6% defensive rebound rate, 5% steal rate, and 5.4% block rate. He’s going to need to be able to play off the ball a little bit more next to Trae Young during the regular season, but for now Dybantsa showed the special skills that made him the first pick in a loaded draft.3. Caleb Wilson, F, Chicago BullsCaleb Wilson answered his biggest question on his very first shot in Las Vegas. Wilson took a pitch from teammate Noa Essengue, drew a switch from the defense, and took one dribble before splashing a three-pointer from the top of the key. Wilson didn’t shoot much in college, which makes sense for a player who used his best-in-class explosiveness to crush 67 dunks in just 24 games. The tape was filled with tough shot-making from mid-range, but those jump shots rarely extended behind the arc. In his summer league debut, Wilson drained seven three-pointers — the same number he made all season at North Carolina. Wilson had five months off since suffering a season-ending broken thumb in his right hand, and he clearly made the most of his time by reportedly getting up 2,000 threes per day. It takes most top prospects years to address the biggest holes in their scouting report, if they ever do it at all. Wilson already proved he’s going to shoot threes as a rookie, and that’s a great sign for his long-term development as a shooter. Read my feature on Wilson’s quest for greatness here.A study by Owen Phillips showed that three-point rate (percentage of field goal attempts from three) is the “stickiest” stat of summer league — the one that carries over the best to the regular season. Well, Wilson moved his three-point rate from 9.1% at UNC to 47.1% for the Summer Bulls. It feels like a thrilling development for Wilson because so many other aspects of his game are already so strong. Wilson’s defensive playmaking is outstanding, and he amassed an 8.5% block rate in Vegas with a number of impressive stuffs, including a chasedown block for the ages. He hit the offensive glass at a higher rate than Cam Boozer (9.1% offensive rebound rate), and finished well when he was set up by his teammates. His poster thrunk against the Jazz was one of the most athletic plays you will ever see. There were still two big negatives for Wilson: his terrible free throw stroke (6-of-18 from the line) and his bad turnover habit, with his giveaways (21) easily outpacing his assists (7). The assist-to-turnover ratio was a positive on his college stat sheet, but that was mostly on stationary reads, and not live dribbles. Wilson was already a great prospect, but after watching him in Las Vegas, it seems possible he’s leveling up at a terrifying rate.2. Cameron Boozer, F, Memphis GrizzliesCameron Boozer’s game has always been defined by steady production that won’t knock your socks off until his team wins and he finishes with monstrous box score numbers. Boozer did it again in this setting despite being one of the youngest players at summer league in his last few days as an 18-year-old. His scoring efficiency was remarkable by shooting 53.7% on two-pointers, 45% on three-pointers, and 80% on free throws for 65.8% true shooting. He continued to clean the defensive glass (18.7% defensive rebound rate), and he looked pretty quick laterally on that end even if he’s not offering much rim protection. Boozer looked a bit thinner in Vegas compared to the bulkier frame he carried at Duke, and it feels like he’s still learning how to use it. He’s not the most nimble player in the middle of the floor, but it doesn’t really matter because his passing vision is excellent and he almost always makes the right decision on time. Boozer’s top-4 contemporaries had flashier highlights, but his team impact was as great as any player in Vegas. I had Boozer as the top player in the 2026 draft in his own tier, and I think summer league only strengthened that argument.1. Brayden Burries, G, Milwaukee BucksBurries’ upside was up for debate as he entered the 2026 NBA Draft, but he looked like an elite connective piece on both ends of the floor during his run in Las Vegas. He shot the hell out of the ball by hitting 44% of his threes, he hit the glass hard and forced takeaways on defense, and made smart decisions every time the ball touched his hands. Burries’ floor spacing and quick trigger from three helps fill in the gaps in the halfcourt in any lineup, but he also showed an ability to use his scoring to find open passing windows to teammates (12 assists) while suppressing turnovers (only one in three games in Vegas). Burries would be a valuable player even if he was just average defensively, but he looks better than that. His 4.2% steal rate and 3.7% block rate in Vegas are excellent numbers for a guard, and the fact that he’s such a good transition player once he yanks the ball away only makes him more effective. I only had Burries at No. 16 on my final board, so he exceeded my expectations more than any player in Las Vegas. The Bucks don’t have to try to shoehorn him into being a lead creator with Ryan Rollins and Tyler Herro on the roster; instead, he can be the ultimate backcourt sidekick who allows everyone else to be the best version of themselves while maximizing his own efficiency.  #NBAs #rookies #Las #Vegas #Summer #League #ranked

failed to make my annual list of the most impressive rookies in summer league. It’s important to tell yourself not to overreact to everything you see.

The good news for this year’s rookie class is that most of the top picks absolutely delivered on the hype. AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, Cameron Boozer, and Caleb Wilson each had flashes of brilliance that showed why the 2026 draft class was so highly regarded. Read my story on six rookies who looked underwhelming in summer league this year, but remember there’s plenty of time for them to turn things around. Jalen Brunson wasn’t very good in summer league, either.

Check out my list of the young veterans already proving to be too good for summer league this year. Now, let’s rank the most impressive rookies in Las Vegas. Apologies to Koa Peat, Labaron Philon, Cam Carr, Chris Cenac, Mikel Brown Jr., Henri Veesar, and Jack Kayil, who were all really good in their own right, but these 11 players stuck out.

11. Hannes Steinbach, F, Charlotte Hornets

Steinbach finally moved into the Hornets’ starting lineup for their fourth summer league game, and immediately showed all the things that made him special. He’s such an effective finisher (67.9% true shooting) in part because he catches everything thrown his way, and can often play through contact on his way to the basket. Steinbach’s elite hands also make him the best rebounder in this draft class, and at this point it’s possible he could be one of the best offensive rebounders in the league as a rookie after posting a comical 18.15% o-board rate in Las Vegas. His defense and three-point shooting remain a work in progress, but Steinbach is great at what he’s good at, and that should give him a foundation for success as he continues to work on his skill set over the years.

10. Bruce Thornton, G, Houston Rockets

Summer league was never going to be a big challenge for an elite college veteran like Thornton, and indeed he looked comfortable and confident from the moment he hit the floor in Vegas. Thornton has a big body for a shorter point guard, and he throws around his weight to open up offensive opportunities for himself and his teammates. He’s become a really good high-volume three-point shooter over the years, and in summer league he made 43 percent from deep on seven attempts per game. He also posted a 2:1 assist-to-turnover ratio, which is par for the course after a college career where he rarely coughed it up. There will be questions about his defense when it’s time for the real season, but Thornton has so much command over the offense and his own scoring ability that he feels like an obvious bet to be the next second-round draft hit.

9. Morez Johnson, F, Dallas Mavericks

Johnson is an absolute hoss as a 250+ pound forward with a 7’3.5 wingspan, and he’s a truly ridiculous athlete for someone with that size. The Mavs’ No. 9 overall pick hit the ground running in Vegas by doing what he does best: finishing efficiently inside, cleaning the defensive glass, and showing a rare combination of quickness and power on defense to give him premium matchup versatility. Johnson still scored a lot of his points on dump-offs and putbacks in Las Vegas, but there were also flashes of freight train drives to the hoop and short mid-range shotmaking that weren’t as prevalent on the college tape. His 69.1% true shooting in two games is about as good as it gets. Johnson’s simple-yet-effective offense set is complemented by a more wide-ranging defensive skill set, where he can protect the rim on the backline or switch onto quicker wings or guards and stick with them for a few seconds on the perimeter. He’s going to be an enforcer next to Cooper Flagg in Dallas from day one, and if his handle and shooting keeps developing, he has the potential to be a lot more than that.

8. Allen Graves, F, Toronto Raptors

Anyone who thought the sixth man from Santa Clara whose draft candidacy was spawned by some young online nerds was going to crash and fail in the league sure looks like they’re going to be proven wrong. Graves did his thing with disruptive defense, impressive rebounding, and a sweet three-point stroke. It seems like Graves couldn’t show the full extent of his offensive game in college, because in Las Vegas he was handling the ball on drives and initiating the pick-and-roll with a level of effectiveness that wasn’t on the Santa Clara tape. Meanwhile, Graves continues to be a monster at forcing takeaways with great hands and an elite nose for the ball. His defense is so aggressive that it’s almost easy to overlook that he shoots such an easy ball from three-point range, knocking down 44% from deep in 16 attempts. I’m already worried I had Graves too low on my board at No. 19, which is exactly where the Raptors picked him. He looks like a steal. Toronto should be feeling really good about this one so far.

7. Yaxel Lendeborg, F, Golden State Warriors

Lendeborg should have been really good in summer league considering he’s already almost 24 years old, an age when most players have graduated out of this setting. Still, it was encouraging to see the former Michigan star dominate in all the ways we’ve come to expect, showing bully-ball drives, sharp connective passing, stout defense, and a sweet three-point stroke. The shooting is the headliner from Lendeborg’s five games in summer league: he hit 56.5% of his threes on the way to immaculate 68% true shooting. He also bumped Cameron Boozer to hell on one drive to the rim, and showed his ability to play through contact on both ends. I like his defensive rebounding and his ball movement, but there were some instances where his lack of agility in the middle of the floor hurt his two-point scoring efficiency. I had Yaxel at No. 5 on my board entering the draft, and he seems like he’s going to be a perfect fit in Golden State, especially if the threes keep dropping. .

6. Darryn Peterson, G, Utah Jazz

Peterson gets off his shot so easily. The No. 2 overall pick glides into stepback jumpers, turns the corner on drives to the rim, and sprints off screens to knock down threes so effortlessly that he just looks like an NBA All-Star. Peterson had some spectacular moments with a driving poster dunk against the Clippers, and some flashes of the defensive playmaking that separates him from other elite offensive guards, but he also still has some fat to trim in his game. Peterson made some puzzling decisions with the ball whether he was settling for floaters or giving it away to the defense. He doesn’t really look like a true point guard (he finished with 26 assists to 24 turnovers through five summer league games), but that should be no big deal for a Jazz team that already has Keyonte George in the backcourt. His skill set still needs some fine-tuning, but Peterson’s talent jumps off the screen, and best of all, he wasn’t slowed down by any of the weird cramping issues that plagued him in college. He’s going to be a highly productive rookie, and a major contributor to what should be a pretty good Utah team this season.

5. Meleek Thomas, G, Cleveland Cavaliers

The long history of John Calipari guards being better in the NBA than in college might have another addition with Meleek Thomas. Thomas had a solid freshman year at Arkansas, but still slipped to the No. 34 overall pick because of concerns about his frame and defensive projection. The sell was always his bucket-getting, and he basically looked unstoppable in his three games in Las Vegas. Thomas scored 85 points in 90 minutes on excellent 65.7% true shooting through three games in summer league, slicing and dicing through opposing defenses at will and splashing shots all over the court. He hit 45.8% of his threes, all of his free throws, and had no problem breaking free from the ball pressure that frustrated other guards. Thomas avoided tunnel vision despite the incredible scoring numbers, and did a good job finding teammates while avoiding mistakes with 13 assists to five turnovers. With elite quickness, a money jumper, and a pretty good feel for the game, Thomas already looks like a second round steal, and someone who should make Cavs fans very excited for his future.

4. AJ Dybantsa, F, Washington Wizards

Dybantsa’s elite slashing and tough shot-making were fully on display in his two-game run in Las Vegas. The No. 1 overall pick is an absolute giant for a wing, but unlike most players his size, he already has the ball on a string. Dybantsa can turn the corner on most defenders, but when he’s shut off, he has plenty of counters to continue probing the defense until he can break free. Dybantsa’s mid-range heavy shot-selection is already drawing some consternation, but it’s hard to get too upset when he still posted blistering 63.8% true shooting despite shooting 1-of-11 from three-point range. That’s just what Dybantsa provides, relentless attacking that will keep hammering holes in the defense until he finally makes a crack. With the caveat that it’s only summer league, Dybantsa’s defense also looked much better than it did at BYU with a 26.6% defensive rebound rate, 5% steal rate, and 5.4% block rate. He’s going to need to be able to play off the ball a little bit more next to Trae Young during the regular season, but for now Dybantsa showed the special skills that made him the first pick in a loaded draft.

3. Caleb Wilson, F, Chicago Bulls

Caleb Wilson answered his biggest question on his very first shot in Las Vegas. Wilson took a pitch from teammate Noa Essengue, drew a switch from the defense, and took one dribble before splashing a three-pointer from the top of the key. Wilson didn’t shoot much in college, which makes sense for a player who used his best-in-class explosiveness to crush 67 dunks in just 24 games. The tape was filled with tough shot-making from mid-range, but those jump shots rarely extended behind the arc. In his summer league debut, Wilson drained seven three-pointers — the same number he made all season at North Carolina. Wilson had five months off since suffering a season-ending broken thumb in his right hand, and he clearly made the most of his time by reportedly getting up 2,000 threes per day. It takes most top prospects years to address the biggest holes in their scouting report, if they ever do it at all. Wilson already proved he’s going to shoot threes as a rookie, and that’s a great sign for his long-term development as a shooter. Read my feature on Wilson’s quest for greatness here.

A study by Owen Phillips showed that three-point rate (percentage of field goal attempts from three) is the “stickiest” stat of summer league — the one that carries over the best to the regular season. Well, Wilson moved his three-point rate from 9.1% at UNC to 47.1% for the Summer Bulls. It feels like a thrilling development for Wilson because so many other aspects of his game are already so strong. Wilson’s defensive playmaking is outstanding, and he amassed an 8.5% block rate in Vegas with a number of impressive stuffs, including a chasedown block for the ages. He hit the offensive glass at a higher rate than Cam Boozer (9.1% offensive rebound rate), and finished well when he was set up by his teammates. His poster thrunk against the Jazz was one of the most athletic plays you will ever see. There were still two big negatives for Wilson: his terrible free throw stroke (6-of-18 from the line) and his bad turnover habit, with his giveaways (21) easily outpacing his assists (7). The assist-to-turnover ratio was a positive on his college stat sheet, but that was mostly on stationary reads, and not live dribbles. Wilson was already a great prospect, but after watching him in Las Vegas, it seems possible he’s leveling up at a terrifying rate.

2. Cameron Boozer, F, Memphis Grizzlies

Cameron Boozer’s game has always been defined by steady production that won’t knock your socks off until his team wins and he finishes with monstrous box score numbers. Boozer did it again in this setting despite being one of the youngest players at summer league in his last few days as an 18-year-old. His scoring efficiency was remarkable by shooting 53.7% on two-pointers, 45% on three-pointers, and 80% on free throws for 65.8% true shooting. He continued to clean the defensive glass (18.7% defensive rebound rate), and he looked pretty quick laterally on that end even if he’s not offering much rim protection. Boozer looked a bit thinner in Vegas compared to the bulkier frame he carried at Duke, and it feels like he’s still learning how to use it. He’s not the most nimble player in the middle of the floor, but it doesn’t really matter because his passing vision is excellent and he almost always makes the right decision on time. Boozer’s top-4 contemporaries had flashier highlights, but his team impact was as great as any player in Vegas. I had Boozer as the top player in the 2026 draft in his own tier, and I think summer league only strengthened that argument.

1. Brayden Burries, G, Milwaukee Bucks

Burries’ upside was up for debate as he entered the 2026 NBA Draft, but he looked like an elite connective piece on both ends of the floor during his run in Las Vegas. He shot the hell out of the ball by hitting 44% of his threes, he hit the glass hard and forced takeaways on defense, and made smart decisions every time the ball touched his hands. Burries’ floor spacing and quick trigger from three helps fill in the gaps in the halfcourt in any lineup, but he also showed an ability to use his scoring to find open passing windows to teammates (12 assists) while suppressing turnovers (only one in three games in Vegas). Burries would be a valuable player even if he was just average defensively, but he looks better than that. His 4.2% steal rate and 3.7% block rate in Vegas are excellent numbers for a guard, and the fact that he’s such a good transition player once he yanks the ball away only makes him more effective. I only had Burries at No. 16 on my final board, so he exceeded my expectations more than any player in Las Vegas. The Bucks don’t have to try to shoehorn him into being a lead creator with Ryan Rollins and Tyler Herro on the roster; instead, he can be the ultimate backcourt sidekick who allows everyone else to be the best version of themselves while maximizing his own efficiency.

#NBAs #rookies #Las #Vegas #Summer #League #ranked">NBA’s 11 best rookies in Las Vegas Summer League, ranked

NBA Summer League is never going to make or break the career of an incoming rookie. A year ago, Cooper Flagg shot 5-of-21 from the floor in his Las Vegas debut, and failed to make my annual list of the most impressive rookies in summer league. It’s important to tell yourself not to overreact to everything you see.

The good news for this year’s rookie class is that most of the top picks absolutely delivered on the hype. AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, Cameron Boozer, and Caleb Wilson each had flashes of brilliance that showed why the 2026 draft class was so highly regarded. Read my story on six rookies who looked underwhelming in summer league this year, but remember there’s plenty of time for them to turn things around. Jalen Brunson wasn’t very good in summer league, either.

Check out my list of the young veterans already proving to be too good for summer league this year. Now, let’s rank the most impressive rookies in Las Vegas. Apologies to Koa Peat, Labaron Philon, Cam Carr, Chris Cenac, Mikel Brown Jr., Henri Veesar, and Jack Kayil, who were all really good in their own right, but these 11 players stuck out.

11. Hannes Steinbach, F, Charlotte Hornets

Steinbach finally moved into the Hornets’ starting lineup for their fourth summer league game, and immediately showed all the things that made him special. He’s such an effective finisher (67.9% true shooting) in part because he catches everything thrown his way, and can often play through contact on his way to the basket. Steinbach’s elite hands also make him the best rebounder in this draft class, and at this point it’s possible he could be one of the best offensive rebounders in the league as a rookie after posting a comical 18.15% o-board rate in Las Vegas. His defense and three-point shooting remain a work in progress, but Steinbach is great at what he’s good at, and that should give him a foundation for success as he continues to work on his skill set over the years.

10. Bruce Thornton, G, Houston Rockets

Summer league was never going to be a big challenge for an elite college veteran like Thornton, and indeed he looked comfortable and confident from the moment he hit the floor in Vegas. Thornton has a big body for a shorter point guard, and he throws around his weight to open up offensive opportunities for himself and his teammates. He’s become a really good high-volume three-point shooter over the years, and in summer league he made 43 percent from deep on seven attempts per game. He also posted a 2:1 assist-to-turnover ratio, which is par for the course after a college career where he rarely coughed it up. There will be questions about his defense when it’s time for the real season, but Thornton has so much command over the offense and his own scoring ability that he feels like an obvious bet to be the next second-round draft hit.

9. Morez Johnson, F, Dallas Mavericks

Johnson is an absolute hoss as a 250+ pound forward with a 7’3.5 wingspan, and he’s a truly ridiculous athlete for someone with that size. The Mavs’ No. 9 overall pick hit the ground running in Vegas by doing what he does best: finishing efficiently inside, cleaning the defensive glass, and showing a rare combination of quickness and power on defense to give him premium matchup versatility. Johnson still scored a lot of his points on dump-offs and putbacks in Las Vegas, but there were also flashes of freight train drives to the hoop and short mid-range shotmaking that weren’t as prevalent on the college tape. His 69.1% true shooting in two games is about as good as it gets. Johnson’s simple-yet-effective offense set is complemented by a more wide-ranging defensive skill set, where he can protect the rim on the backline or switch onto quicker wings or guards and stick with them for a few seconds on the perimeter. He’s going to be an enforcer next to Cooper Flagg in Dallas from day one, and if his handle and shooting keeps developing, he has the potential to be a lot more than that.

8. Allen Graves, F, Toronto Raptors

Anyone who thought the sixth man from Santa Clara whose draft candidacy was spawned by some young online nerds was going to crash and fail in the league sure looks like they’re going to be proven wrong. Graves did his thing with disruptive defense, impressive rebounding, and a sweet three-point stroke. It seems like Graves couldn’t show the full extent of his offensive game in college, because in Las Vegas he was handling the ball on drives and initiating the pick-and-roll with a level of effectiveness that wasn’t on the Santa Clara tape. Meanwhile, Graves continues to be a monster at forcing takeaways with great hands and an elite nose for the ball. His defense is so aggressive that it’s almost easy to overlook that he shoots such an easy ball from three-point range, knocking down 44% from deep in 16 attempts. I’m already worried I had Graves too low on my board at No. 19, which is exactly where the Raptors picked him. He looks like a steal. Toronto should be feeling really good about this one so far.

7. Yaxel Lendeborg, F, Golden State Warriors

Lendeborg should have been really good in summer league considering he’s already almost 24 years old, an age when most players have graduated out of this setting. Still, it was encouraging to see the former Michigan star dominate in all the ways we’ve come to expect, showing bully-ball drives, sharp connective passing, stout defense, and a sweet three-point stroke. The shooting is the headliner from Lendeborg’s five games in summer league: he hit 56.5% of his threes on the way to immaculate 68% true shooting. He also bumped Cameron Boozer to hell on one drive to the rim, and showed his ability to play through contact on both ends. I like his defensive rebounding and his ball movement, but there were some instances where his lack of agility in the middle of the floor hurt his two-point scoring efficiency. I had Yaxel at No. 5 on my board entering the draft, and he seems like he’s going to be a perfect fit in Golden State, especially if the threes keep dropping. .

6. Darryn Peterson, G, Utah Jazz

Peterson gets off his shot so easily. The No. 2 overall pick glides into stepback jumpers, turns the corner on drives to the rim, and sprints off screens to knock down threes so effortlessly that he just looks like an NBA All-Star. Peterson had some spectacular moments with a driving poster dunk against the Clippers, and some flashes of the defensive playmaking that separates him from other elite offensive guards, but he also still has some fat to trim in his game. Peterson made some puzzling decisions with the ball whether he was settling for floaters or giving it away to the defense. He doesn’t really look like a true point guard (he finished with 26 assists to 24 turnovers through five summer league games), but that should be no big deal for a Jazz team that already has Keyonte George in the backcourt. His skill set still needs some fine-tuning, but Peterson’s talent jumps off the screen, and best of all, he wasn’t slowed down by any of the weird cramping issues that plagued him in college. He’s going to be a highly productive rookie, and a major contributor to what should be a pretty good Utah team this season.

5. Meleek Thomas, G, Cleveland Cavaliers

The long history of John Calipari guards being better in the NBA than in college might have another addition with Meleek Thomas. Thomas had a solid freshman year at Arkansas, but still slipped to the No. 34 overall pick because of concerns about his frame and defensive projection. The sell was always his bucket-getting, and he basically looked unstoppable in his three games in Las Vegas. Thomas scored 85 points in 90 minutes on excellent 65.7% true shooting through three games in summer league, slicing and dicing through opposing defenses at will and splashing shots all over the court. He hit 45.8% of his threes, all of his free throws, and had no problem breaking free from the ball pressure that frustrated other guards. Thomas avoided tunnel vision despite the incredible scoring numbers, and did a good job finding teammates while avoiding mistakes with 13 assists to five turnovers. With elite quickness, a money jumper, and a pretty good feel for the game, Thomas already looks like a second round steal, and someone who should make Cavs fans very excited for his future.

4. AJ Dybantsa, F, Washington Wizards

Dybantsa’s elite slashing and tough shot-making were fully on display in his two-game run in Las Vegas. The No. 1 overall pick is an absolute giant for a wing, but unlike most players his size, he already has the ball on a string. Dybantsa can turn the corner on most defenders, but when he’s shut off, he has plenty of counters to continue probing the defense until he can break free. Dybantsa’s mid-range heavy shot-selection is already drawing some consternation, but it’s hard to get too upset when he still posted blistering 63.8% true shooting despite shooting 1-of-11 from three-point range. That’s just what Dybantsa provides, relentless attacking that will keep hammering holes in the defense until he finally makes a crack. With the caveat that it’s only summer league, Dybantsa’s defense also looked much better than it did at BYU with a 26.6% defensive rebound rate, 5% steal rate, and 5.4% block rate. He’s going to need to be able to play off the ball a little bit more next to Trae Young during the regular season, but for now Dybantsa showed the special skills that made him the first pick in a loaded draft.

3. Caleb Wilson, F, Chicago Bulls

Caleb Wilson answered his biggest question on his very first shot in Las Vegas. Wilson took a pitch from teammate Noa Essengue, drew a switch from the defense, and took one dribble before splashing a three-pointer from the top of the key. Wilson didn’t shoot much in college, which makes sense for a player who used his best-in-class explosiveness to crush 67 dunks in just 24 games. The tape was filled with tough shot-making from mid-range, but those jump shots rarely extended behind the arc. In his summer league debut, Wilson drained seven three-pointers — the same number he made all season at North Carolina. Wilson had five months off since suffering a season-ending broken thumb in his right hand, and he clearly made the most of his time by reportedly getting up 2,000 threes per day. It takes most top prospects years to address the biggest holes in their scouting report, if they ever do it at all. Wilson already proved he’s going to shoot threes as a rookie, and that’s a great sign for his long-term development as a shooter. Read my feature on Wilson’s quest for greatness here.

A study by Owen Phillips showed that three-point rate (percentage of field goal attempts from three) is the “stickiest” stat of summer league — the one that carries over the best to the regular season. Well, Wilson moved his three-point rate from 9.1% at UNC to 47.1% for the Summer Bulls. It feels like a thrilling development for Wilson because so many other aspects of his game are already so strong. Wilson’s defensive playmaking is outstanding, and he amassed an 8.5% block rate in Vegas with a number of impressive stuffs, including a chasedown block for the ages. He hit the offensive glass at a higher rate than Cam Boozer (9.1% offensive rebound rate), and finished well when he was set up by his teammates. His poster thrunk against the Jazz was one of the most athletic plays you will ever see. There were still two big negatives for Wilson: his terrible free throw stroke (6-of-18 from the line) and his bad turnover habit, with his giveaways (21) easily outpacing his assists (7). The assist-to-turnover ratio was a positive on his college stat sheet, but that was mostly on stationary reads, and not live dribbles. Wilson was already a great prospect, but after watching him in Las Vegas, it seems possible he’s leveling up at a terrifying rate.

2. Cameron Boozer, F, Memphis Grizzlies

Cameron Boozer’s game has always been defined by steady production that won’t knock your socks off until his team wins and he finishes with monstrous box score numbers. Boozer did it again in this setting despite being one of the youngest players at summer league in his last few days as an 18-year-old. His scoring efficiency was remarkable by shooting 53.7% on two-pointers, 45% on three-pointers, and 80% on free throws for 65.8% true shooting. He continued to clean the defensive glass (18.7% defensive rebound rate), and he looked pretty quick laterally on that end even if he’s not offering much rim protection. Boozer looked a bit thinner in Vegas compared to the bulkier frame he carried at Duke, and it feels like he’s still learning how to use it. He’s not the most nimble player in the middle of the floor, but it doesn’t really matter because his passing vision is excellent and he almost always makes the right decision on time. Boozer’s top-4 contemporaries had flashier highlights, but his team impact was as great as any player in Vegas. I had Boozer as the top player in the 2026 draft in his own tier, and I think summer league only strengthened that argument.

1. Brayden Burries, G, Milwaukee Bucks

Burries’ upside was up for debate as he entered the 2026 NBA Draft, but he looked like an elite connective piece on both ends of the floor during his run in Las Vegas. He shot the hell out of the ball by hitting 44% of his threes, he hit the glass hard and forced takeaways on defense, and made smart decisions every time the ball touched his hands. Burries’ floor spacing and quick trigger from three helps fill in the gaps in the halfcourt in any lineup, but he also showed an ability to use his scoring to find open passing windows to teammates (12 assists) while suppressing turnovers (only one in three games in Vegas). Burries would be a valuable player even if he was just average defensively, but he looks better than that. His 4.2% steal rate and 3.7% block rate in Vegas are excellent numbers for a guard, and the fact that he’s such a good transition player once he yanks the ball away only makes him more effective. I only had Burries at No. 16 on my final board, so he exceeded my expectations more than any player in Las Vegas. The Bucks don’t have to try to shoehorn him into being a lead creator with Ryan Rollins and Tyler Herro on the roster; instead, he can be the ultimate backcourt sidekick who allows everyone else to be the best version of themselves while maximizing his own efficiency.

#NBAs #rookies #Las #Vegas #Summer #League #ranked

Post Comment