×
ISL 2025-26: Title aspirants Bengaluru FC, Mumbai City face off at Sree Kanteerava  With title aspirations on the line, Bengaluru FC (BFC) and Mumbai City FC face off in a crucial Indian Super League (ISL) 2025-26 encounter at the Sree Kanteerava Stadium in Bengaluru on Saturday.For both teams, a win will go a long way in the race to capture the big prize. With four games to go, BFC (15 points) is five points adrift of leader Mohun Bagan Super Giant, while Mumbai City trails by two.BFC will look to make the most of its last home fixture.For Pep Munoz, whose tenure as BFC head coach has begun with a loss and a draw, Saturday’s game feels like a final.ALSO READ | Genius Sports pitches ISL roadmap to clubs; Mohun Bagan skips meeting“We are still in the title race. If we have a good result tomorrow, we will be right up there. Tomorrow is a final. The players and supporters also know that this is the final,” Munoz said on Friday.Like BFC, Mumbai City FC enters the field after a dip in form. The visitor’s four-game unbeaten streak came to an end last week, when it suffered a 0-2 loss to FC Goa.“Mumbai is a team that is made to win the league. But we have a good squad too. It’s our last game at home and we want to do our best,” Munoz said.Published on Apr 24, 2026  #ISL #Title #aspirants #Bengaluru #Mumbai #City #face #Sree #Kanteerava

ISL 2025-26: Title aspirants Bengaluru FC, Mumbai City face off at Sree Kanteerava

With title aspirations on the line, Bengaluru FC (BFC) and Mumbai City FC face off in a crucial Indian Super League (ISL) 2025-26 encounter at the Sree Kanteerava Stadium in Bengaluru on Saturday.

For both teams, a win will go a long way in the race to capture the big prize. With four games to go, BFC (15 points) is five points adrift of leader Mohun Bagan Super Giant, while Mumbai City trails by two.

BFC will look to make the most of its last home fixture.

For Pep Munoz, whose tenure as BFC head coach has begun with a loss and a draw, Saturday’s game feels like a final.

ALSO READ | Genius Sports pitches ISL roadmap to clubs; Mohun Bagan skips meeting

“We are still in the title race. If we have a good result tomorrow, we will be right up there. Tomorrow is a final. The players and supporters also know that this is the final,” Munoz said on Friday.

Like BFC, Mumbai City FC enters the field after a dip in form. The visitor’s four-game unbeaten streak came to an end last week, when it suffered a 0-2 loss to FC Goa.

“Mumbai is a team that is made to win the league. But we have a good squad too. It’s our last game at home and we want to do our best,” Munoz said.

Published on Apr 24, 2026

#ISL #Title #aspirants #Bengaluru #Mumbai #City #face #Sree #Kanteerava

With title aspirations on the line, Bengaluru FC (BFC) and Mumbai City FC face off in a crucial Indian Super League (ISL) 2025-26 encounter at the Sree Kanteerava Stadium in Bengaluru on Saturday.

For both teams, a win will go a long way in the race to capture the big prize. With four games to go, BFC (15 points) is five points adrift of leader Mohun Bagan Super Giant, while Mumbai City trails by two.

BFC will look to make the most of its last home fixture.

For Pep Munoz, whose tenure as BFC head coach has begun with a loss and a draw, Saturday’s game feels like a final.

ALSO READ | Genius Sports pitches ISL roadmap to clubs; Mohun Bagan skips meeting

“We are still in the title race. If we have a good result tomorrow, we will be right up there. Tomorrow is a final. The players and supporters also know that this is the final,” Munoz said on Friday.

Like BFC, Mumbai City FC enters the field after a dip in form. The visitor’s four-game unbeaten streak came to an end last week, when it suffered a 0-2 loss to FC Goa.

“Mumbai is a team that is made to win the league. But we have a good squad too. It’s our last game at home and we want to do our best,” Munoz said.

Published on Apr 24, 2026

Source link
#ISL #Title #aspirants #Bengaluru #Mumbai #City #face #Sree #Kanteerava

Previous post

Rob and Michele Reiner’s Son Jake Recalls Moment He Learned About His Parents’ ‘Violent’ Deaths

Next post

MLB Best Bets Today: Strikeout Props and Total Plays to Target | Deadspin.com <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-0 py-0 pb-4 undefined"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-1200/1777037867871" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-1200/1777037867871" alt="Mar 26, 2026; New York City, New York, USA; New York Mets starting pitcher Freddy Peralta (51) pitches against the Pittsburgh Pirates during the fourth inning at Citi Field. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Mar 26, 2026; New York City, New York, USA; New York Mets starting pitcher Freddy Peralta (51) pitches against the Pittsburgh Pirates during the fourth inning at Citi Field. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>OK it’s not quite a full card tonight as the Padres and Diamondbacks travel to the baseball equivalent of the moon … the 7,000 ft elevation of Mexico City.</p><p>But that’s still 14 games to pore through, let’s go with a couple MLB picks for today</p><p>Season Record 11-10-1, -0.08 Units</p><h2 id="rockies-at-mets" class=" uppercase break-words">Rockies at Mets</h2><p><strong>Freddy Peralta Over K’s (-143 DraftKings)</strong></p><p>The Mets prized offseason acquisition has been <a href="https://deadspin.com/reviewing-mlbs-top-signings-and-trades-through-mid-april/" target="_blank">good but not great so far</a>, going 1-2 with a 4.05 ERA and 1.09 WHIP in 26.2 IP over five starts. He’s rocking a 25% K% with 28 K’s. His 30.2% Whiff% is slightly off from his career 31.4% rate, but his K% has dipped more precipitously from 29.7%.</p><p>And his Called Strike% is actually higher this year at 16.1%, vs. 15.5% overall. So I suspect he’s due to see his K’s pick up a bit.</p><p>He gets a prime opponent for that in the Rockies, particularly thanks to getting them away from Coors. Colorado has a league high 27.1% K% on the road. Willi Castro (42.9% Road K%), Hunter Goodman (41.2%), Mickey Moniak (34.8%) and Edouard Jullien (33.3%) all figure to start tonight, giving Peralta plenty of swing and miss potential.</p><p>The biggest impediment is likely Peralta’s ability (or lack thereof) to get deep into games as he’s only made it through 6 innings once this year. The Mets used a lot of bullpen innings last night, so I will play that he gets there or close and gets some whiffs along the way.</p> </section><p><span class="inline-block mr-3 uppercase shrink-0 font-bold">Our Current Best Offers</span></p><p>Channel debug: <span class="font-semibold text-gray-700">betting</span></p> <section id="section-3"> <h2 id="rangers-at-as" class=" uppercase break-words">Rangers at A’s</h2><p><strong>Under 8.5 (-115 FanDuel)</strong></p><p>Whether it’s the humidor or whatever, Globe Life Park in Arlington has turned into the just about the best pitchers park in MLB. It has an 85 runs factor, tied with T-Mobile in Seattle for lowest in the league. Of course the betting number reflects that, but does it fully capture that A’s starter Luis Severino just so happens to pitch much better when he’s leaves his bandbox in Sacramento?</p><p>The A’s righty has a downright lousy 6.20 ERA and 1.70 WHIP after 5 starts this year. The big culprit is a horrendous 18% BB% that’s a bit out of line with his fairly average 7.5% career mark. He hasn’t solved that walk problem away from home this year, in fact he’s worse, But his ERA is a little better away this year (5.40 vs. 7.15) and was a lot better last year (3.02 vs. 6.01). I don’t expect him to actually be good, just non-horendous.</p><p>Rangers starter <a href="https://nolanwritin.com/early-returns-raise-red-flags-nathan-eovaldi-first-two-starts" target="_blank">Nathan Eovaldi had a couple clunkers</a> to start the season, but in his last 3 starts he has a 2.00 ERA and 1.22 WHIP over 18 innings with 17 K’s and 5 BB’s. Both teams has meh offenses, with Texas at 100 wRC+ and the A’s at 95. The weak link here is clearly Severino, but I’ll side with enough run suppression.</p> </section><p><span class="inline-block mr-3 uppercase shrink-0 font-bold">Our Current Best Offers</span></p><p>Channel debug: <span class="font-semibold text-gray-700">betting</span></p> </div> #MLB #Bets #Today #Strikeout #Props #Total #Plays #Target #Deadspin.com

It’s not that Simpson is bad, or even that the Rams taking him wasn’t on the cards. In fact, for a long time there was speculation the team would take Simpson in the 1st round, just at No. 29, until Los Angeles traded the pick for Trent McDuffie. The confusion around the selection is aimed more at the fact that taking a quarterback to prepare for the eventuality of Matthew Stafford’s retirement was too cute, and too smart for its own good — especially when the Rams are a team built to win right now.

This only got worse following the draft when coach Sean McVay looked flat-out annoyed while hearing GM Les Snead wax poetic about Ty Simpson.

“We’ve talked about the importance of Jimmy [Garoppolo]. To be able to add somebody that you can evaluate a body of work where he was asked to play the position and a lot of things that do translate in terms of concepts, reading with his feet, some of the different things in the drop back in the play-action game and the movement game. There are a lot of things that [Alabama offensive coordinator Ryan] Grubb did that’s very similar to how we operate, so it made it an easier evaluation to be able to say, ‘Alright, what would that look like if he did translate it to our level?’”

Here’s another clip from McVay’s post-draft presser:

The most generous reading of these comments is that McVay is fine with the pick. His verbiage is more akin to how coaches talk about day three picks, not someone you take No. 13 overall. This is especially notable considering the board at the time, which could have landed the Rams someone like Makai Lemon or Kenyon Sadiq, either of whom would have bolstered the Rams passing attack — or even safety Dillon Thieneman, who would have been an upgrade to the secondary.

It’s going to be at least two years before we learn whether or not picking Simpson was a genius move or not, but there are more questions about the pick after people learned that Snead had personal entanglements with the Simpson family.

It’s only natural to question whether or not Snead had tunnel vision for Simpson throughout this process. One would think that a general manager and head coach’s vision naturally aligns, but this is a case where it might not. Snead’s job is to be more forward-looking at the overall health of the franchise, while McVay’s is to get the most out of the guys he has in front of him. There very well could have been friction about seeing the Falcons’ pick (which they obtained in 2025) as a means to land a quarterback, with the expectation that they’ll otherwise be picking in the back-end of the 20s, or hopefully 32 — while McVay didn’t want to put the cart in front of the horse, and instead get someone that would help prevent the Rams from flaming out in the playoffs.

What makes this all so interesting is that the Rams are typically an organization held up as a paragon of vision and smart decision-making. Selecting Simpson could end up being genius, or a bizarrely desperate move to get a second-round QB talent too early in the draft, just to correct a problem that doesn’t exist yet.

When Simpson does eventually take over for the Rams at QB, he’ll have barely played football at all since leaving high school:

One thing is certain: If the Rams fail to make it to the Super Bowl this season, then everyone will be looking at who could have helped the team with this No. 13 pick — and it won’t be Ty Simpson.

#Rams #shocking #Simpson #pick #pissed #Sean #McVay #heres">The Rams’ shocking Ty Simpson pick might have pissed off Sean McVay, and here’s why  There were a lot of surprises in the first round of the NFL Draft on Thursday night. The Titans taking Carnell Tate at No. 4? Unexpected. Caleb Downs, Rueben Bain, and Makai Lemon all sliding? Shocking — but it was what the Los Angeles Rams did with the No. 13 overall pick that was truly jaw-dropping, selecting Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson to be their signal caller of the future. We gave the pick a C+ grade.It’s not that Simpson is bad, or even that the Rams taking him wasn’t on the cards. In fact, for a long time there was speculation the team would take Simpson in the 1st round, just at No. 29, until Los Angeles traded the pick for Trent McDuffie. The confusion around the selection is aimed more at the fact that taking a quarterback to prepare for the eventuality of Matthew Stafford’s retirement was too cute, and too smart for its own good — especially when the Rams are a team built to win right now.This only got worse following the draft when coach Sean McVay looked flat-out annoyed while hearing GM Les Snead wax poetic about Ty Simpson.“We’ve talked about the importance of Jimmy [Garoppolo]. To be able to add somebody that you can evaluate a body of work where he was asked to play the position and a lot of things that do translate in terms of concepts, reading with his feet, some of the different things in the drop back in the play-action game and the movement game. There are a lot of things that [Alabama offensive coordinator Ryan] Grubb did that’s very similar to how we operate, so it made it an easier evaluation to be able to say, ‘Alright, what would that look like if he did translate it to our level?’”Here’s another clip from McVay’s post-draft presser:The most generous reading of these comments is that McVay is fine with the pick. His verbiage is more akin to how coaches talk about day three picks, not someone you take No. 13 overall. This is especially notable considering the board at the time, which could have landed the Rams someone like Makai Lemon or Kenyon Sadiq, either of whom would have bolstered the Rams passing attack — or even safety Dillon Thieneman, who would have been an upgrade to the secondary.It’s going to be at least two years before we learn whether or not picking Simpson was a genius move or not, but there are more questions about the pick after people learned that Snead had personal entanglements with the Simpson family.It’s only natural to question whether or not Snead had tunnel vision for Simpson throughout this process. One would think that a general manager and head coach’s vision naturally aligns, but this is a case where it might not. Snead’s job is to be more forward-looking at the overall health of the franchise, while McVay’s is to get the most out of the guys he has in front of him. There very well could have been friction about seeing the Falcons’ pick (which they obtained in 2025) as a means to land a quarterback, with the expectation that they’ll otherwise be picking in the back-end of the 20s, or hopefully 32 — while McVay didn’t want to put the cart in front of the horse, and instead get someone that would help prevent the Rams from flaming out in the playoffs.What makes this all so interesting is that the Rams are typically an organization held up as a paragon of vision and smart decision-making. Selecting Simpson could end up being genius, or a bizarrely desperate move to get a second-round QB talent too early in the draft, just to correct a problem that doesn’t exist yet.When Simpson does eventually take over for the Rams at QB, he’ll have barely played football at all since leaving high school:One thing is certain: If the Rams fail to make it to the Super Bowl this season, then everyone will be looking at who could have helped the team with this No. 13 pick — and it won’t be Ty Simpson.  #Rams #shocking #Simpson #pick #pissed #Sean #McVay #heres

a lot of surprises in the first round of the NFL Draft on Thursday night. The Titans taking Carnell Tate at No. 4? Unexpected. Caleb Downs, Rueben Bain, and Makai Lemon all sliding? Shocking — but it was what the Los Angeles Rams did with the No. 13 overall pick that was truly jaw-dropping, selecting Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson to be their signal caller of the future. We gave the pick a C+ grade.

It’s not that Simpson is bad, or even that the Rams taking him wasn’t on the cards. In fact, for a long time there was speculation the team would take Simpson in the 1st round, just at No. 29, until Los Angeles traded the pick for Trent McDuffie. The confusion around the selection is aimed more at the fact that taking a quarterback to prepare for the eventuality of Matthew Stafford’s retirement was too cute, and too smart for its own good — especially when the Rams are a team built to win right now.

This only got worse following the draft when coach Sean McVay looked flat-out annoyed while hearing GM Les Snead wax poetic about Ty Simpson.

“We’ve talked about the importance of Jimmy [Garoppolo]. To be able to add somebody that you can evaluate a body of work where he was asked to play the position and a lot of things that do translate in terms of concepts, reading with his feet, some of the different things in the drop back in the play-action game and the movement game. There are a lot of things that [Alabama offensive coordinator Ryan] Grubb did that’s very similar to how we operate, so it made it an easier evaluation to be able to say, ‘Alright, what would that look like if he did translate it to our level?’”

Here’s another clip from McVay’s post-draft presser:

The most generous reading of these comments is that McVay is fine with the pick. His verbiage is more akin to how coaches talk about day three picks, not someone you take No. 13 overall. This is especially notable considering the board at the time, which could have landed the Rams someone like Makai Lemon or Kenyon Sadiq, either of whom would have bolstered the Rams passing attack — or even safety Dillon Thieneman, who would have been an upgrade to the secondary.

It’s going to be at least two years before we learn whether or not picking Simpson was a genius move or not, but there are more questions about the pick after people learned that Snead had personal entanglements with the Simpson family.

It’s only natural to question whether or not Snead had tunnel vision for Simpson throughout this process. One would think that a general manager and head coach’s vision naturally aligns, but this is a case where it might not. Snead’s job is to be more forward-looking at the overall health of the franchise, while McVay’s is to get the most out of the guys he has in front of him. There very well could have been friction about seeing the Falcons’ pick (which they obtained in 2025) as a means to land a quarterback, with the expectation that they’ll otherwise be picking in the back-end of the 20s, or hopefully 32 — while McVay didn’t want to put the cart in front of the horse, and instead get someone that would help prevent the Rams from flaming out in the playoffs.

What makes this all so interesting is that the Rams are typically an organization held up as a paragon of vision and smart decision-making. Selecting Simpson could end up being genius, or a bizarrely desperate move to get a second-round QB talent too early in the draft, just to correct a problem that doesn’t exist yet.

When Simpson does eventually take over for the Rams at QB, he’ll have barely played football at all since leaving high school:

One thing is certain: If the Rams fail to make it to the Super Bowl this season, then everyone will be looking at who could have helped the team with this No. 13 pick — and it won’t be Ty Simpson.

#Rams #shocking #Simpson #pick #pissed #Sean #McVay #heres">The Rams’ shocking Ty Simpson pick might have pissed off Sean McVay, and here’s why

There were a lot of surprises in the first round of the NFL Draft on Thursday night. The Titans taking Carnell Tate at No. 4? Unexpected. Caleb Downs, Rueben Bain, and Makai Lemon all sliding? Shocking — but it was what the Los Angeles Rams did with the No. 13 overall pick that was truly jaw-dropping, selecting Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson to be their signal caller of the future. We gave the pick a C+ grade.

It’s not that Simpson is bad, or even that the Rams taking him wasn’t on the cards. In fact, for a long time there was speculation the team would take Simpson in the 1st round, just at No. 29, until Los Angeles traded the pick for Trent McDuffie. The confusion around the selection is aimed more at the fact that taking a quarterback to prepare for the eventuality of Matthew Stafford’s retirement was too cute, and too smart for its own good — especially when the Rams are a team built to win right now.

This only got worse following the draft when coach Sean McVay looked flat-out annoyed while hearing GM Les Snead wax poetic about Ty Simpson.

“We’ve talked about the importance of Jimmy [Garoppolo]. To be able to add somebody that you can evaluate a body of work where he was asked to play the position and a lot of things that do translate in terms of concepts, reading with his feet, some of the different things in the drop back in the play-action game and the movement game. There are a lot of things that [Alabama offensive coordinator Ryan] Grubb did that’s very similar to how we operate, so it made it an easier evaluation to be able to say, ‘Alright, what would that look like if he did translate it to our level?’”

Here’s another clip from McVay’s post-draft presser:

The most generous reading of these comments is that McVay is fine with the pick. His verbiage is more akin to how coaches talk about day three picks, not someone you take No. 13 overall. This is especially notable considering the board at the time, which could have landed the Rams someone like Makai Lemon or Kenyon Sadiq, either of whom would have bolstered the Rams passing attack — or even safety Dillon Thieneman, who would have been an upgrade to the secondary.

It’s going to be at least two years before we learn whether or not picking Simpson was a genius move or not, but there are more questions about the pick after people learned that Snead had personal entanglements with the Simpson family.

It’s only natural to question whether or not Snead had tunnel vision for Simpson throughout this process. One would think that a general manager and head coach’s vision naturally aligns, but this is a case where it might not. Snead’s job is to be more forward-looking at the overall health of the franchise, while McVay’s is to get the most out of the guys he has in front of him. There very well could have been friction about seeing the Falcons’ pick (which they obtained in 2025) as a means to land a quarterback, with the expectation that they’ll otherwise be picking in the back-end of the 20s, or hopefully 32 — while McVay didn’t want to put the cart in front of the horse, and instead get someone that would help prevent the Rams from flaming out in the playoffs.

What makes this all so interesting is that the Rams are typically an organization held up as a paragon of vision and smart decision-making. Selecting Simpson could end up being genius, or a bizarrely desperate move to get a second-round QB talent too early in the draft, just to correct a problem that doesn’t exist yet.

When Simpson does eventually take over for the Rams at QB, he’ll have barely played football at all since leaving high school:

One thing is certain: If the Rams fail to make it to the Super Bowl this season, then everyone will be looking at who could have helped the team with this No. 13 pick — and it won’t be Ty Simpson.

#Rams #shocking #Simpson #pick #pissed #Sean #McVay #heres

Toronto has reversed its plan to charge fans to attend its World Cup fan festival, with the city council approving a revised model that includes a free general admission option after some councillors objected that the proposed $10 fee broke an earlier promise.

City staff had proposed a plan last week to introduce $10 general admission tickets for the event. The festival, which is set to include live match broadcasts, food and entertainment, was originally promoted by the city last year as a “free and inclusive space” for fans to enjoy games during the June 11 to July 19 World Cup.

However, after objections from some councillors, who raised concerns about affordability for residents, Toronto mayor Olivia Chow asked staff this week to revisit the ticketing proposal.

City staff issued a report on Wednesday proposing that, of the 20,000 general admission tickets available each day, 15,600 will be free and 500 will be reserved for community groups at no cost. There will also be 3,900 premium tickets available daily, priced between $100 and $ 300.

ALSO READ: Injured Yamal will come back stronger at World Cup: Barcelona’s Flick

In the original report last week, staff said the ticketing plan was required as a crowd-control measure and to help cover costs related to an “enhanced fan experience”.

“Fan Fest should be free for general admission,” Chow told reporters this week before council voted 18-3 to approve the revised plan. “We can offer VIP packages for those who want them, but the gates should be open for everyone.”

Toronto, one of 16 cities across Canada, the United States and Mexico hosting matches for the 48-team World Cup, will stage six games.

Published on Apr 24, 2026

#FIFA #World #Cup #Toronto #drops #entry #fee #approves #free #general #admission #World #Cup #fan #festival">FIFA World Cup 2026: Toronto drops entry fee, approves free general admission for World Cup fan festival  Toronto has reversed its plan to charge fans to attend its World Cup fan festival, with the city council approving a revised model that includes a free general admission option after some councillors objected that the proposed  fee broke an earlier promise.City staff had proposed a plan last week to introduce  general admission tickets for the event. The festival, which is set to include live match broadcasts, food and entertainment, was originally promoted by the city last year as a “free and inclusive space” for fans to enjoy games during the June 11 to July 19 World Cup.However, after objections from some councillors, who raised concerns about affordability for residents, Toronto mayor Olivia Chow asked staff this week to revisit the ticketing proposal.City staff issued a report on Wednesday proposing that, of the 20,000 general admission tickets available each day, 15,600 will be free and 500 will be reserved for community groups at no cost. There will also be 3,900 premium tickets available daily, priced between 0 and $ 300.ALSO READ: Injured Yamal will come back stronger at World Cup: Barcelona’s FlickIn the original report last week, staff said the ticketing plan was required as a crowd-control measure and to help cover costs related to an “enhanced fan experience”.“Fan Fest should be free for general admission,” Chow told reporters this week before council voted 18-3 to approve the revised plan. “We can offer VIP packages for those who want them, but the gates should be open for everyone.”Toronto, one of 16 cities across Canada, the United States and Mexico hosting matches for the 48-team World Cup, will stage six games.Published on Apr 24, 2026  #FIFA #World #Cup #Toronto #drops #entry #fee #approves #free #general #admission #World #Cup #fan #festival

Injured Yamal will come back stronger at World Cup: Barcelona’s Flick

In the original report last week, staff said the ticketing plan was required as a crowd-control measure and to help cover costs related to an “enhanced fan experience”.

“Fan Fest should be free for general admission,” Chow told reporters this week before council voted 18-3 to approve the revised plan. “We can offer VIP packages for those who want them, but the gates should be open for everyone.”

Toronto, one of 16 cities across Canada, the United States and Mexico hosting matches for the 48-team World Cup, will stage six games.

Published on Apr 24, 2026

#FIFA #World #Cup #Toronto #drops #entry #fee #approves #free #general #admission #World #Cup #fan #festival">FIFA World Cup 2026: Toronto drops entry fee, approves free general admission for World Cup fan festival

Toronto has reversed its plan to charge fans to attend its World Cup fan festival, with the city council approving a revised model that includes a free general admission option after some councillors objected that the proposed $10 fee broke an earlier promise.

City staff had proposed a plan last week to introduce $10 general admission tickets for the event. The festival, which is set to include live match broadcasts, food and entertainment, was originally promoted by the city last year as a “free and inclusive space” for fans to enjoy games during the June 11 to July 19 World Cup.

However, after objections from some councillors, who raised concerns about affordability for residents, Toronto mayor Olivia Chow asked staff this week to revisit the ticketing proposal.

City staff issued a report on Wednesday proposing that, of the 20,000 general admission tickets available each day, 15,600 will be free and 500 will be reserved for community groups at no cost. There will also be 3,900 premium tickets available daily, priced between $100 and $ 300.

ALSO READ: Injured Yamal will come back stronger at World Cup: Barcelona’s Flick

In the original report last week, staff said the ticketing plan was required as a crowd-control measure and to help cover costs related to an “enhanced fan experience”.

“Fan Fest should be free for general admission,” Chow told reporters this week before council voted 18-3 to approve the revised plan. “We can offer VIP packages for those who want them, but the gates should be open for everyone.”

Toronto, one of 16 cities across Canada, the United States and Mexico hosting matches for the 48-team World Cup, will stage six games.

Published on Apr 24, 2026

#FIFA #World #Cup #Toronto #drops #entry #fee #approves #free #general #admission #World #Cup #fan #festival

Post Comment