×
इंदौर जिले में अब 17 लाख 91 हजार हुए कुल मतदाता, फोटोयुक्त मतदाता सूची जारी

इंदौर जिले में अब 17 लाख 91 हजार हुए कुल मतदाता, फोटोयुक्त मतदाता सूची जारी

Indore news , , , ,

इंदौर में फोटोयुक्त मतदाता सूची पुनरीक्षण-2026 की समीक्षा बैठक हुई। राजनीतिक दलों को अंतिम मतदाता सूची सौंपी गई। जिले में कुल 25.08 लाख से अधिक मतदाता…और पढ़ें

Publish Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:53:56 PM (IST)Updated Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:53:56 PM (IST)

इंदौर जिले में फोटोयुक्त मतदाता सूची जारी। (फाइल फोटो)

HighLights

  1. इंदौर में फोटोयुक्त मतदाता सूची पुनरीक्षण बैठक संपन्न हुई।
  2. राजनीतिक दलों को अंतिम मतदाता सूची सौंपी गई।
  3. जिले में कुल 25.08 लाख मतदाता पंजीकृत हैं।

नईदुनिया प्रतिनिधि, इंदौर। फोटोयुक्त मतदाता सूची के वार्षिक पुनरीक्षण-2026 के संबंध में स्टैंडिंग कमेटी की बैठक गुरुवार को कलेक्टर शिवम वर्मा द्वारा आयोजित की गई।

बैठक में निर्वाचन आयोग के निर्धारित कार्यक्रम के अनुसार जिले में नगरीय निकायों एवं पंचायतों की अंतिम प्रकाशित फोटोयुक्त मतदाता सूची, पुनरीक्षण कार्य तथा दावे-आपत्तियों के निराकरण चर्चा हई।

बैठक के मौजूद मान्यता प्राप्त राजनीतिक दलों के प्रतिनिधियों को अंतिम प्रकाशित मतदाता सूची सौंपी गई। बैठक में सहायक उप जिला निर्वाचन अधिकारी अजीत श्रीवास्तव तथा मास्टर ट्रेनर श्री आर. के. पाण्डे ने बताया कि 27 जुलाई को अंतिम फोटोयुक्त मतदाता सूची का प्रकाशन किया जा चुका है।

नगरीय निकाय में मतदाताओं की जानकारी

  • कुल मतदाता: 17,91 ,658
  • पुरुष : 9,00,979
  • महिला : 8,90 ,586
  • अन्य : 93

जनपद पंचायत क्षेत्र में मतदाता

  • कुल मतदाता: 7,16,523
  • पुरुष : 3,62,004
  • महिला : 3,54 ,507
  • अन्य : 12

नगरीय एवं पंचायत क्षेत्र के मतदाता

  • कुल मतदाता: 25,8,181
  • पुरुष : 12,62, 983 पुरुष
  • महिला : 12, 45,093
  • अन्य : 105

नगरीय निकायवार मतदाता सूची

  • नगर पालिक निगम इन्दौर में कुल मतदाना : 16 ,61, 801
  • महूगांव : 31,535,
  • मानपुर : 5,893
  • राऊ: 30 ,783
  • सांवेर: 12,758
  • देपालपुर: 15,220
  • गौतमपुरा: 11,140
  • बेटमा : 13 , 335
  • हातोद: 9 ,193

जनपद पंचायतवार मतदाता सूची

  • इन्दौर: 1,84 598
  • डा. अंबेडकर नगर (महू) : 2 ,5,731
  • सांवेर :1,68 ,968
  • देपालपुर: 1,57 , 226

Source link
#इदर #जल #म #अब #लख #हजर #हए #कल #मतदत #फटयकत #मतदत #सच #जर

Tag
Previous post

Anthropic says its own AI models breached three companies during security tests | TechCrunch<div> <p id="speakable-summary" class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic said Thursday that an internal investigation uncovered three incidents in which its AI model Claude breached the systems of three organizations while conducting cybersecurity tests. The investigation, and disclosure, comes more than a week after OpenAI disclosed that one of its unreleased models breached <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/27/openais-hugging-face-breach-has-reignited-the-debate-over-alignment-and-control/">Hugging Face’s systems</a> during internal testing.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">In all three cases, a Claude model reached the internet from within a testing environment while interacting with a third party and then gained unauthorized access to the live systems of these organizations, Anthropic said in <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/investigating-incidents-cybersecurity-evals">a blog post</a>, describing what it found and what the company plans to change to prevent this from happening again.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic said the OpenAI episode earlier this month prompted the company to conduct its own cybersecurity evaluation. It specifically looked for evidence that Claude had accessed the internet from within testing environments, which are designed to act as sandboxes and keep models isolated.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Among the 141,006 evaluation runs it reviewed, the AI lab found three incidents in which its model accessed the internet while interacting with Irregular, one of its third-party partners. Anthropic said the access traced back to a misconfiguration in the evaluation environment run with Irregular. It called this a “misunderstanding” between the two companies over whether the test setup had internet access, when in fact it did. </p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic said it isn’t placing blame and is “approaching the fixes as if the responsibility were ours alone,” while observing that Irregular is conducting its own separate investigation.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because of that open connection, the model gained unauthorized access to the production infrastructure of three different organizations. Anthropic said the incidents involved three different Claude models: Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, and an internal research test model.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notably, Anthropic said that in each of these cases “Claude was explicitly told by our prompt that it had no internet access.” It appears that the AI model assumed real-world systems to be part of the exercise it was asked to perform.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">That assumption didn’t hold up uniformly, as it turns out. The three models didn’t behave the same way once evidence emerged that their targets were real, which Anthropic flagged as one of the more eye-opening findings Thursday.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Opus 4.7, the oldest of the three, recognized that it had reached a real production system in all four runs of that incident. In two of them, it rationalized that the real company must somehow be part of the exercise, but in all four, it kept attacking anyway, including pulling credentials and touching a database of production data. Mythos 5 also picked up on signs that it was on the real internet, but it talked itself back into believing it was still in a simulation, going on to publish a malicious software package to the public Python software registry PyPI, which was then downloaded and run by outside systems before being caught. Only the internal research test model, Anthropic’s newest, stopped on its own once it concluded the target was real.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">In response, Anthropic said significant controls must be placed on these kinds of evaluations if powerful AI models are involved, echoing some sentiments within the cybersecurity community.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company also noted that Claude was running without the additional safety monitoring and classifiers it deploys on generally available models — safeguards it said would have blocked the behavior, because the evaluations are designed to measure the underlying model’s raw capabilities.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Importantly, Anthropic said it found no evidence of any model “pursuing a goal of its own” and instead merely tried to complete the task it was asked to do.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Though comparisons between the mishaps of these fiercely competitive companies are inevitable, Anthropic in its blog post drew a clear distinction between its cybersecurity tests and those of OpenAI, noting where OpenAI’s model exploited an unknown software vulnerability to break out of its test environment, Anthropic’s models instead reached the internet through a path that had, by mistake, been left open.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic also drew a distinction between itself and OpenAI by noting that it discovered the incidents itself, through a proactive review, and that the two affected organizations it was able to reach hadn’t previously detected the activity or flagged it to Anthropic. (In contrast, Hugging Face detected the recent intrusion of its own systems first; it was only in the following days that OpenAI identified and disclosed that its own AI agent was the perpetrator.)</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company added that it’s now working with the independent evaluation group METR on a third-party review of the incidents.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI’s accidental breach of Hugging Face, which was the first verifiable case of an AI lab losing control of its model, has sparked a string of wildly differing reactions from the industry and politicians. This latest disclosure from Anthropic ensures the debate over AI models and security will continue.</p> </div><p><em>When you purchase through links in our articles, <a href="https://techcrunch.com/techcrunch-affiliate-monetization-standards/">we may earn a small commission</a>. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.</em></p>#Anthropic #models #breached #companies #security #tests #TechCrunchAnthropic,OpenAI

Next post

ब्रेकअप के बाद दूसरे के साथ देख भड़का युवक, सरेराह कर दी युवती की बेल्ट से पिटाई, पुलिस ने पकड़ा तो कान पकड़कर मांगी माफी

Related Posts

Post Comment

Wolfnewss | Powered By SpiceThemes