×
Online MAGA cope is now Congressional strategy

Online MAGA cope is now Congressional strategy

Tech-news , , , ,

When it comes to defending Donald Trump from the worst accusations, the MAGA influencer-industrial complex, whether out of loyalty or self-preservation, often defaults to whataboutism, arguing that the Democrats are just as guilty as Trump, or (ideally) worse. This principle has held true with the current Jeffrey Epstein saga, and as their audience’s anger against the Trump administration skyrockets, the MAGA influencer world is trying a new tack: blame the Democrats, not Trump, for keeping the “Epstein Files” under lock and key.

Trump, the person who could feasibly order the release of said documents, has spent the past few weeks trying to smother the drama from a few different angles, ultimately only fanning flames every time he attempted to deemphasize Epstein. He tried dismissing it during a Cabinet meeting (“Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?”), downplaying it on Truth Social (“Let’s … not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about”), and criticizing a reporter for asking about Epstein (“Are people still talking about this guy?”).

But there’s no indication that the MAGA-influencer complex will ever stop talking about Epstein, or that their audiences will ever let it go. But over the past week, the influencer class, and subsequently the GOP, has started to maneuver Trump’s spin into a more acceptable talking point, inspired by a recent Wall Street Journal bombshell reporting that the Justice Department had told Trump back in May that his name was in the pile of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. “Of course there’s going to be mentions of Epstein, who was a member of Mar-a-Lago until Trump kicked him out” over a decade ago, said Alex Jones, the Infowars host who’d spent the past several days raging about the Epstein Files. But while he had been calling for the head of anyone in the administration for failing to deliver, it was much easier to circle the wagon around Trump the moment that a mainstream publication tied him to bad behavior.

Laura Loomer, another prominent influencer who’d been criticizing the administration for its underwhelming response, also took the opportunity to try coming home by questioning where exactly Trump’s name appeared in the files, while also glazing Trump. “Are they trying to say that a file is somebody’s name in an address book?” she rhetorically asked Politico Playbook on Thursday, adding that she, too, had a large address book. “Some of those people in my address book have committed crimes. Does that mean I’m implicated in their crimes? President Trump is not a pedophile. And I look forward to seeing him sue every journalist and publication that is trying to imply that he is one.”

Either cater to their audience’s demand to keep asking what the elites are hiding about Epstein, or maintain their relationship and standing with the White House

In the days and weeks since the Trump administration released their brief memo about the Epstein files, the MAGA influencer world — specifically, those who built their careers “just asking questions” about Epstein while also cozying up to Trump — has grappled with a difficult choice: either cater to their audience’s demand to keep asking what the elites are hiding about Epstein, or maintain their relationship and standing with the White House.

Some have chosen their audiences, gambling that their following is loyal beyond Trump, and that their influence isn’t contingent on their White House access. (Tucker Carlson, for instance, published a two-hour episode that was entirely focused on the Epstein conspiracies — one week after he implied that Epstein was a Mossad agent.) Others have completely flipped back to Trump, such as the influencer Catturd, an onetime Epstein truther who began implying that “the podcast bro ‘influencers’” now criticizing Trump may have taken Russian money to do so. (In 2024, US prosecutors indicted two employees of RT for illegally funneling money to spread Kremlin propaganda, alleging that they had put $10 million into a Tennessee-based media company whose description matched up with Tenet Media, which worked with Tim Pool, Benny Johnson, and others.) Catturd then tweeted that he was “never abandoning Trump”, and spent the subsequent week calling for Barack Obama’s indictment and posting memes of press secretary Karoline Leavitt.

But for everyone else, it’s been difficult to have it both ways. Loomer’s attempt to pin the blame on Attorney General Pam Bondi, for instance, failed when Trump refused to fire Bondi, while influencers who attempted to convince their audience to move onto different topics saw their audience revolt (particularly if those influencers, such as Benny Johnson, cited their conversations with government officials as reason enough).

Normal, everyday constituents also hold deep suspicions about the entire Epstein matter

And before you dismiss it as sturm-and-drang on the internet, the very same dynamic can be seen in Congress, where the Republicans are trying their best to satisfy the base while appeasing the President — a task made difficult because their normal, everyday constituents also hold deep suspicions about the entire Epstein matter. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released last week found that the vast majority of voters — including a majority of Republicans — believe that the government is hiding information about the infamous “client list”. And tellingly, only 35 percent of Republicans believed that the Trump administration was handling it well. (30 percent said Trump was not, and 35 percent were unsure.)

On Wednesday, a House Oversight subcommittee voted to subpoena the Department of Justice for the Epstein Files, with a majority composed of five Democrats and three Republicans. The two Republicans who opposed the subpoena ended up tacking on other requests for Epstein-related communications from Biden officials and the DOJ. Per ABC News, the “officials” included the Democratic subjects of MAGA’s most enduring conspiracy theories: “Bill and Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Robert Mueller, William Barr, Jeff Sessions and Alberto Gonzales.”

In other words, no one seems to be able to run with Trump’s assessment that Epstein is “somebody that nobody cares about.” Unable to quell the belief that there’s a conspiracy afoot, the only thing to do is try to implicate Democrats. Even Speaker Mike Johnson, who abruptly called a five-week recess last Thursday to prevent his Democratic counterparts from voting to release the Epstein files, leaned in on a potential conspiracy. “One of our concerns is, of course, that it was held in the hands of the DOJ leaders under the last administration, the Biden-Harris administration,” he told a Newsmax reporter on Wednesday. “And we all know how crooked and corrupt so many of those officials were, how they engaged in lawfare against President Trump. He has a concern, and I do as well, that things could have been doctored in those records.” When it comes to right-wing talking points based on sordid, unproven allegations, it’s best to start winking early — and in sync with the president, too.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.


Source link
#Online #MAGA #cope #Congressional #strategy

Tag

Related Posts

The Trump administration is waging a culture war on science, and the latest salvo is in the form of a dry, bureaucratic proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that could threaten the future of US science as we know it.

The proposal would give political appointees unprecedented control over grant funding, the method through which scientists receive federal money to perform groundbreaking space research such as the search for evidence of organic compounds on Mars or the discovery of some of the earliest galaxies in the universe.

A typical proposed rule from the OMB garners less than 100 public comments. This rule has netted over 500,000 comments, the large majority of which appear to be negative, including a response from respected nonprofit The Planetary Society, which has criticized everything from the proposal’s rules around publication to its move away from peer review to its chilling effect on scientists in every field.

“Nearly every proposed aspect of these rule changes has some deleterious or negative consequence for the practice of science,” Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society, tells The Verge.

“There’s concrete harm, even if you’re not a scientist,” he points out. The biggest obstacle is the restrictions on the funding of open-access publication, which is the method through which space science papers are made freely available to the public.

“There’s concrete harm, even if you’re not a scientist.”

— Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society

For more than a decade, NASA has prided itself on making public the data collected with NASA instruments, as well as the science papers that come from studying that data. The new changes reverse that trend, making science data more difficult for everyone to access. Forbidding the use of grant funding for open-access publication means it’ll be harder for the public to see the research that their tax money helped fund.

“There’s no really good argument for that, unless you’re trying to use it as a means of control over the scientists themselves,” Dreier says.

Then there’s the ability to terminate grants because of the associations or political leanings of the scientists themselves. Consider the data collected by the Mars rovers — precious data that cost billions of dollars and took decades of expertise to acquire — and a scientist, who doesn’t even work for NASA directly, who wants to study that data and has a novel idea for research that their fellow scientists think is worthwhile and important. Hypothetically, the new regulations would allow a partisan non-expert employed by the White House to nix that scientist’s funding because they posted an anti-Trump meme on X years ago.

It gets worse. “You don’t even have to be in violation of a rule” to have your funding cut, Dreier says. Grants can be revoked at any time, for any reason, if they are deemed against the interests of the president’s whims: “There’s a capriciousness that is enabled by these changes, and an opacity of the decision process.”

The problems with the regulations are not just ideological. They largely impose a bureaucratic burden: Is any scientist going to want to set up an international partnership, or attend a conference, or try to publish their data publicly and for free, when doing so requires time and paperwork applying for exemptions that may or may not be granted by a government body that has no expertise or interest in their work? Are they going to set up a potentially fruitful collaboration with other scientists in China, or Russia, or even Canada, when doing so introduces a risk to their own work, knowing their livelihood could be yanked away when the president decides he doesn’t like another nation tomorrow?

“There’s no really good argument for that, unless you’re trying to use it as a means of control over the scientists themselves.”

— Casey Dreier

This is a separate, though perhaps even more dangerous, attack on science than the proposed cuts to NASA funding that are affecting programs like the operation of the Mars rovers. Under the proposed OMB rules, the contracts through which NASA builds spacecraft and collects data would remain, but the grants for scientists to analyze that data would be under political threat.

“There’s a distinction between data collection and science,” Dreier says. Building amazing tools like the Mars rovers or the James Webb Space Telescope and using them to collect data is only the first step in making progress: “The science is what happens when you pay a scientist to sit down and look at the data, interpret it, model it, test it, and then present it and go through the process of arguing about it.”

“What are we collecting data for, if we’re not going to support the scientists to study it?”

Despite the significant public pushback against the move, including a Senate hearing with the director of the OMB, Russell Vought, in which Democratic senators described the effects of the rule as “absurdity” and “bias,” the OMB does not seem disposed to back down and withdraw its proposed rule. Instead, it will likely face a series of legal challenges, including from a group of 24 governors and attorneys general who argue that the rule is unconstitutional and a violation of the separation of powers.

What is at stake here is bigger than slashed funds or a temporary refocusing on Earthly concerns over space research. “This is not a budget cut,” Dreier points out. Budget cuts are easy to understand and easy to argue against. What is happening here is more pernicious: “This is a surgical, scalpel-like attack on the actual process of science that is buried under procedural rules and boring-sounding language.”

Update July 17th: The OMB proposal has received over 500,000 comments, not 50,000 as stated in a previous version of this story.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
#war #woke #science #space #researchNews,Policy,Politics,Science,Space">The war on ‘woke science’ comes for space researchThe Trump administration is waging a culture war on science, and the latest salvo is in the form of a dry, bureaucratic proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that could threaten the future of US science as we know it.The proposal would give political appointees unprecedented control over grant funding, the method through which scientists receive federal money to perform groundbreaking space research such as the search for evidence of organic compounds on Mars or the discovery of some of the earliest galaxies in the universe.A typical proposed rule from the OMB garners less than 100 public comments. This rule has netted over 500,000 comments, the large majority of which appear to be negative, including a response from respected nonprofit The Planetary Society, which has criticized everything from the proposal’s rules around publication to its move away from peer review to its chilling effect on scientists in every field.“Nearly every proposed aspect of these rule changes has some deleterious or negative consequence for the practice of science,” Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society, tells The Verge.“There’s concrete harm, even if you’re not a scientist,” he points out. The biggest obstacle is the restrictions on the funding of open-access publication, which is the method through which space science papers are made freely available to the public.“There’s concrete harm, even if you’re not a scientist.”— Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary SocietyFor more than a decade, NASA has prided itself on making public the data collected with NASA instruments, as well as the science papers that come from studying that data. The new changes reverse that trend, making science data more difficult for everyone to access. Forbidding the use of grant funding for open-access publication means it’ll be harder for the public to see the research that their tax money helped fund.“There’s no really good argument for that, unless you’re trying to use it as a means of control over the scientists themselves,” Dreier says.Then there’s the ability to terminate grants because of the associations or political leanings of the scientists themselves. Consider the data collected by the Mars rovers — precious data that cost billions of dollars and took decades of expertise to acquire — and a scientist, who doesn’t even work for NASA directly, who wants to study that data and has a novel idea for research that their fellow scientists think is worthwhile and important. Hypothetically, the new regulations would allow a partisan non-expert employed by the White House to nix that scientist’s funding because they posted an anti-Trump meme on X years ago.It gets worse. “You don’t even have to be in violation of a rule” to have your funding cut, Dreier says. Grants can be revoked at any time, for any reason, if they are deemed against the interests of the president’s whims: “There’s a capriciousness that is enabled by these changes, and an opacity of the decision process.”The problems with the regulations are not just ideological. They largely impose a bureaucratic burden: Is any scientist going to want to set up an international partnership, or attend a conference, or try to publish their data publicly and for free, when doing so requires time and paperwork applying for exemptions that may or may not be granted by a government body that has no expertise or interest in their work? Are they going to set up a potentially fruitful collaboration with other scientists in China, or Russia, or even Canada, when doing so introduces a risk to their own work, knowing their livelihood could be yanked away when the president decides he doesn’t like another nation tomorrow?“There’s no really good argument for that, unless you’re trying to use it as a means of control over the scientists themselves.”— Casey DreierThis is a separate, though perhaps even more dangerous, attack on science than the proposed cuts to NASA funding that are affecting programs like the operation of the Mars rovers. Under the proposed OMB rules, the contracts through which NASA builds spacecraft and collects data would remain, but the grants for scientists to analyze that data would be under political threat.“There’s a distinction between data collection and science,” Dreier says. Building amazing tools like the Mars rovers or the James Webb Space Telescope and using them to collect data is only the first step in making progress: “The science is what happens when you pay a scientist to sit down and look at the data, interpret it, model it, test it, and then present it and go through the process of arguing about it.”“What are we collecting data for, if we’re not going to support the scientists to study it?”Despite the significant public pushback against the move, including a Senate hearing with the director of the OMB, Russell Vought, in which Democratic senators described the effects of the rule as “absurdity” and “bias,” the OMB does not seem disposed to back down and withdraw its proposed rule. Instead, it will likely face a series of legal challenges, including from a group of 24 governors and attorneys general who argue that the rule is unconstitutional and a violation of the separation of powers.What is at stake here is bigger than slashed funds or a temporary refocusing on Earthly concerns over space research. “This is not a budget cut,” Dreier points out. Budget cuts are easy to understand and easy to argue against. What is happening here is more pernicious: “This is a surgical, scalpel-like attack on the actual process of science that is buried under procedural rules and boring-sounding language.”Update July 17th: The OMB proposal has received over 500,000 comments, not 50,000 as stated in a previous version of this story.Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.Georgina TorbetCloseGeorgina TorbetPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by Georgina TorbetNewsCloseNewsPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All NewsPolicyClosePolicyPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All PolicyPoliticsClosePoliticsPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All PoliticsScienceCloseSciencePosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ScienceSpaceCloseSpacePosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All Space#war #woke #science #space #researchNews,Policy,Politics,Science,Space

culture war on science, and the latest salvo is in the form of a dry, bureaucratic proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that could threaten the future of US science as we know it.

The proposal would give political appointees unprecedented control over grant funding, the method through which scientists receive federal money to perform groundbreaking space research such as the search for evidence of organic compounds on Mars or the discovery of some of the earliest galaxies in the universe.

A typical proposed rule from the OMB garners less than 100 public comments. This rule has netted over 500,000 comments, the large majority of which appear to be negative, including a response from respected nonprofit The Planetary Society, which has criticized everything from the proposal’s rules around publication to its move away from peer review to its chilling effect on scientists in every field.

“Nearly every proposed aspect of these rule changes has some deleterious or negative consequence for the practice of science,” Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society, tells The Verge.

“There’s concrete harm, even if you’re not a scientist,” he points out. The biggest obstacle is the restrictions on the funding of open-access publication, which is the method through which space science papers are made freely available to the public.

“There’s concrete harm, even if you’re not a scientist.”

— Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society

For more than a decade, NASA has prided itself on making public the data collected with NASA instruments, as well as the science papers that come from studying that data. The new changes reverse that trend, making science data more difficult for everyone to access. Forbidding the use of grant funding for open-access publication means it’ll be harder for the public to see the research that their tax money helped fund.

“There’s no really good argument for that, unless you’re trying to use it as a means of control over the scientists themselves,” Dreier says.

Then there’s the ability to terminate grants because of the associations or political leanings of the scientists themselves. Consider the data collected by the Mars rovers — precious data that cost billions of dollars and took decades of expertise to acquire — and a scientist, who doesn’t even work for NASA directly, who wants to study that data and has a novel idea for research that their fellow scientists think is worthwhile and important. Hypothetically, the new regulations would allow a partisan non-expert employed by the White House to nix that scientist’s funding because they posted an anti-Trump meme on X years ago.

It gets worse. “You don’t even have to be in violation of a rule” to have your funding cut, Dreier says. Grants can be revoked at any time, for any reason, if they are deemed against the interests of the president’s whims: “There’s a capriciousness that is enabled by these changes, and an opacity of the decision process.”

The problems with the regulations are not just ideological. They largely impose a bureaucratic burden: Is any scientist going to want to set up an international partnership, or attend a conference, or try to publish their data publicly and for free, when doing so requires time and paperwork applying for exemptions that may or may not be granted by a government body that has no expertise or interest in their work? Are they going to set up a potentially fruitful collaboration with other scientists in China, or Russia, or even Canada, when doing so introduces a risk to their own work, knowing their livelihood could be yanked away when the president decides he doesn’t like another nation tomorrow?

“There’s no really good argument for that, unless you’re trying to use it as a means of control over the scientists themselves.”

— Casey Dreier

This is a separate, though perhaps even more dangerous, attack on science than the proposed cuts to NASA funding that are affecting programs like the operation of the Mars rovers. Under the proposed OMB rules, the contracts through which NASA builds spacecraft and collects data would remain, but the grants for scientists to analyze that data would be under political threat.

“There’s a distinction between data collection and science,” Dreier says. Building amazing tools like the Mars rovers or the James Webb Space Telescope and using them to collect data is only the first step in making progress: “The science is what happens when you pay a scientist to sit down and look at the data, interpret it, model it, test it, and then present it and go through the process of arguing about it.”

“What are we collecting data for, if we’re not going to support the scientists to study it?”

Despite the significant public pushback against the move, including a Senate hearing with the director of the OMB, Russell Vought, in which Democratic senators described the effects of the rule as “absurdity” and “bias,” the OMB does not seem disposed to back down and withdraw its proposed rule. Instead, it will likely face a series of legal challenges, including from a group of 24 governors and attorneys general who argue that the rule is unconstitutional and a violation of the separation of powers.

What is at stake here is bigger than slashed funds or a temporary refocusing on Earthly concerns over space research. “This is not a budget cut,” Dreier points out. Budget cuts are easy to understand and easy to argue against. What is happening here is more pernicious: “This is a surgical, scalpel-like attack on the actual process of science that is buried under procedural rules and boring-sounding language.”

Update July 17th: The OMB proposal has received over 500,000 comments, not 50,000 as stated in a previous version of this story.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

#war #woke #science #space #researchNews,Policy,Politics,Science,Space">The war on ‘woke science’ comes for space research

The Trump administration is waging a culture war on science, and the latest salvo is in the form of a dry, bureaucratic proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that could threaten the future of US science as we know it.

The proposal would give political appointees unprecedented control over grant funding, the method through which scientists receive federal money to perform groundbreaking space research such as the search for evidence of organic compounds on Mars or the discovery of some of the earliest galaxies in the universe.

A typical proposed rule from the OMB garners less than 100 public comments. This rule has netted over 500,000 comments, the large majority of which appear to be negative, including a response from respected nonprofit The Planetary Society, which has criticized everything from the proposal’s rules around publication to its move away from peer review to its chilling effect on scientists in every field.

“Nearly every proposed aspect of these rule changes has some deleterious or negative consequence for the practice of science,” Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society, tells The Verge.

“There’s concrete harm, even if you’re not a scientist,” he points out. The biggest obstacle is the restrictions on the funding of open-access publication, which is the method through which space science papers are made freely available to the public.

“There’s concrete harm, even if you’re not a scientist.”

— Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society

For more than a decade, NASA has prided itself on making public the data collected with NASA instruments, as well as the science papers that come from studying that data. The new changes reverse that trend, making science data more difficult for everyone to access. Forbidding the use of grant funding for open-access publication means it’ll be harder for the public to see the research that their tax money helped fund.

“There’s no really good argument for that, unless you’re trying to use it as a means of control over the scientists themselves,” Dreier says.

Then there’s the ability to terminate grants because of the associations or political leanings of the scientists themselves. Consider the data collected by the Mars rovers — precious data that cost billions of dollars and took decades of expertise to acquire — and a scientist, who doesn’t even work for NASA directly, who wants to study that data and has a novel idea for research that their fellow scientists think is worthwhile and important. Hypothetically, the new regulations would allow a partisan non-expert employed by the White House to nix that scientist’s funding because they posted an anti-Trump meme on X years ago.

It gets worse. “You don’t even have to be in violation of a rule” to have your funding cut, Dreier says. Grants can be revoked at any time, for any reason, if they are deemed against the interests of the president’s whims: “There’s a capriciousness that is enabled by these changes, and an opacity of the decision process.”

The problems with the regulations are not just ideological. They largely impose a bureaucratic burden: Is any scientist going to want to set up an international partnership, or attend a conference, or try to publish their data publicly and for free, when doing so requires time and paperwork applying for exemptions that may or may not be granted by a government body that has no expertise or interest in their work? Are they going to set up a potentially fruitful collaboration with other scientists in China, or Russia, or even Canada, when doing so introduces a risk to their own work, knowing their livelihood could be yanked away when the president decides he doesn’t like another nation tomorrow?

“There’s no really good argument for that, unless you’re trying to use it as a means of control over the scientists themselves.”

— Casey Dreier

This is a separate, though perhaps even more dangerous, attack on science than the proposed cuts to NASA funding that are affecting programs like the operation of the Mars rovers. Under the proposed OMB rules, the contracts through which NASA builds spacecraft and collects data would remain, but the grants for scientists to analyze that data would be under political threat.

“There’s a distinction between data collection and science,” Dreier says. Building amazing tools like the Mars rovers or the James Webb Space Telescope and using them to collect data is only the first step in making progress: “The science is what happens when you pay a scientist to sit down and look at the data, interpret it, model it, test it, and then present it and go through the process of arguing about it.”

“What are we collecting data for, if we’re not going to support the scientists to study it?”

Despite the significant public pushback against the move, including a Senate hearing with the director of the OMB, Russell Vought, in which Democratic senators described the effects of the rule as “absurdity” and “bias,” the OMB does not seem disposed to back down and withdraw its proposed rule. Instead, it will likely face a series of legal challenges, including from a group of 24 governors and attorneys general who argue that the rule is unconstitutional and a violation of the separation of powers.

What is at stake here is bigger than slashed funds or a temporary refocusing on Earthly concerns over space research. “This is not a budget cut,” Dreier points out. Budget cuts are easy to understand and easy to argue against. What is happening here is more pernicious: “This is a surgical, scalpel-like attack on the actual process of science that is buried under procedural rules and boring-sounding language.”

Update July 17th: The OMB proposal has received over 500,000 comments, not 50,000 as stated in a previous version of this story.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
#war #woke #science #space #researchNews,Policy,Politics,Science,Space
It turns out that even San Francisco mayor Daniel Lurie, who once declared that the city should be a testbed for emerging tech, has his limits. Especially when that emerging tech creates a massive hours-long traffic jam that leaves thousands at a standstill.

Mayor Lurie has asked state regulators to bolster rules for autonomous vehicles nearly two weeks after Waymo robotaxis became immobile in heavy July 4 traffic, ran out of power, and blocked key streets, further compounding the gridlock. The traffic jam, which trapped municipal shuttles, became a citywide problem that affected thousands of people.

In his letter to the state Department of Transportation, which was viewed by TechCrunch, Lurie pointed to two events — a widespread power outage in December and the Golden Gate Bridge fireworks show on July 4 that attracted 100,000 spectators — both of which led to dozens of stranded Waymo vehicles and paralyzed traffic. The San Francisco Chronicle first reported on the letter.

The events, he said in the letter, “demonstrated that California’s current regulatory framework does not adequately address how autonomous vehicles operate during major incidents, planned or not. California’s challenge now is not just whether autonomous vehicles can operate safely under normal conditions, but also whether they can perform reliably during extraordinary ones.”

Lurie said autonomous vehicle manufacturers should be able to demonstrate four “core operational capabilities” and asked the California Department of Transportation to establish statewide standards to prevent future problems like the July 4 gridlock incident.

Under Lurie’s vision, companies would be required to immediately remove or relocate robotaxis from active travel lanes to keep people moving and be required to be able to adapt in real time, adjusting their routes, service area, and pickup and drop-off locations. Companies would also have to share real-time operations data with local agencies, including service disruptions, the locations of immobile robotaxis, and recovery efforts as well as demonstrate through testing that they can handle large influxes of people and traffic.

TechCrunch has reached out to Waymo for comment. The article will be updated once the company responds.

Any company that wants to operate a robotaxi service in California has to successfully navigate two testing and deployment permit processes, one administered by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles and the other by the Public Utilities Commission. California’s existing regulatory framework is stricter than that of other states like Texas and Arizona, but that hasn’t dissuaded companies from trying to operate there.

San Francisco and the wider area that stretches south into Silicon Valley have long been a testbed for autonomous vehicle technology. Six companies, including Nuro, Waymo, and Zoox, hold driverless testing permits, which allow the vehicles to drive without a human safety operator behind the wheel.

But the area has also become the launch point for commercial services, which requires other permits from the DMV and CPUC.

Waymo is the largest, with an estimated 1,000 robotaxis operating in the Bay Area today. But there are plenty of others either testing or poised to launch commercial operations, including Amazon-owned Zoox as well as a premium robotaxi service that will be operated by Uber. Tesla has a branded robotaxi service but it doesn’t use driverless vehicles, nor does it have the permits to do so. Instead, Tesla has a charter transportation permit, which allows its own drivers to pick up and drop off riders throughout San Francisco in vehicles equipped with its advanced driver-assistance system rather than fully autonomous software.

Waymo’s scale has made it the focal point for regulators in San Francisco and beyond. The company now operates in 11 cities and has said it completes more than 500,000 paid rides every week. In San Francisco, Lurie noted that Waymo had agreed to restrict its service on July 4 near the waterfront and had even assigned a representative to the city’s emergency center. But that wasn’t enough to keep the Waymos out of the heavy traffic that occurred outside of that district.

Lurie said these voluntary actions are no longer enough — a reflection of just how big Waymo’s fleet has become. He said the four proposed requirements “will not undermine autonomous vehicles; they will strengthen them.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#San #Francisco #mayor #pushes #tougher #rules #Waymo #traffic #fiasco #TechCrunchrobotaxis,Waymo">San Francisco mayor pushes for tougher rules after the Waymo traffic fiasco | TechCrunch It turns out that even San Francisco mayor Daniel Lurie, who once declared that the city should be a testbed for emerging tech, has his limits. Especially when that emerging tech creates a massive hours-long traffic jam that leaves thousands at a standstill. Mayor Lurie has asked state regulators to bolster rules for autonomous vehicles nearly two weeks after Waymo robotaxis became immobile in heavy July 4 traffic, ran out of power, and blocked key streets, further compounding the gridlock. The traffic jam, which trapped municipal shuttles, became a citywide problem that affected thousands of people. In his letter to the state Department of Transportation, which was viewed by TechCrunch, Lurie pointed to two events — a widespread power outage in December and the Golden Gate Bridge fireworks show on July 4 that attracted 100,000 spectators — both of which led to dozens of stranded Waymo vehicles and paralyzed traffic. The San Francisco Chronicle first reported on the letter. The events, he said in the letter, “demonstrated that California’s current regulatory framework does not adequately address how autonomous vehicles operate during major incidents, planned or not. California’s challenge now is not just whether autonomous vehicles can operate safely under normal conditions, but also whether they can perform reliably during extraordinary ones.” Lurie said autonomous vehicle manufacturers should be able to demonstrate four “core operational capabilities” and asked the California Department of Transportation to establish statewide standards to prevent future problems like the July 4 gridlock incident. Under Lurie’s vision, companies would be required to immediately remove or relocate robotaxis from active travel lanes to keep people moving and be required to be able to adapt in real time, adjusting their routes, service area, and pickup and drop-off locations. Companies would also have to share real-time operations data with local agencies, including service disruptions, the locations of immobile robotaxis, and recovery efforts as well as demonstrate through testing that they can handle large influxes of people and traffic. TechCrunch has reached out to Waymo for comment. The article will be updated once the company responds. Any company that wants to operate a robotaxi service in California has to successfully navigate two testing and deployment permit processes, one administered by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles and the other by the Public Utilities Commission. California’s existing regulatory framework is stricter than that of other states like Texas and Arizona, but that hasn’t dissuaded companies from trying to operate there. San Francisco and the wider area that stretches south into Silicon Valley have long been a testbed for autonomous vehicle technology. Six companies, including Nuro, Waymo, and Zoox, hold driverless testing permits, which allow the vehicles to drive without a human safety operator behind the wheel. But the area has also become the launch point for commercial services, which requires other permits from the DMV and CPUC. Waymo is the largest, with an estimated 1,000 robotaxis operating in the Bay Area today. But there are plenty of others either testing or poised to launch commercial operations, including Amazon-owned Zoox as well as a premium robotaxi service that will be operated by Uber. Tesla has a branded robotaxi service but it doesn’t use driverless vehicles, nor does it have the permits to do so. Instead, Tesla has a charter transportation permit, which allows its own drivers to pick up and drop off riders throughout San Francisco in vehicles equipped with its advanced driver-assistance system rather than fully autonomous software. Waymo’s scale has made it the focal point for regulators in San Francisco and beyond. The company now operates in 11 cities and has said it completes more than 500,000 paid rides every week. In San Francisco, Lurie noted that Waymo had agreed to restrict its service on July 4 near the waterfront and had even assigned a representative to the city’s emergency center. But that wasn’t enough to keep the Waymos out of the heavy traffic that occurred outside of that district. Lurie said these voluntary actions are no longer enough — a reflection of just how big Waymo’s fleet has become. He said the four proposed requirements “will not undermine autonomous vehicles; they will strengthen them.” When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#San #Francisco #mayor #pushes #tougher #rules #Waymo #traffic #fiasco #TechCrunchrobotaxis,Waymo

testbed for emerging tech, has his limits. Especially when that emerging tech creates a massive hours-long traffic jam that leaves thousands at a standstill.

Mayor Lurie has asked state regulators to bolster rules for autonomous vehicles nearly two weeks after Waymo robotaxis became immobile in heavy July 4 traffic, ran out of power, and blocked key streets, further compounding the gridlock. The traffic jam, which trapped municipal shuttles, became a citywide problem that affected thousands of people.

In his letter to the state Department of Transportation, which was viewed by TechCrunch, Lurie pointed to two events — a widespread power outage in December and the Golden Gate Bridge fireworks show on July 4 that attracted 100,000 spectators — both of which led to dozens of stranded Waymo vehicles and paralyzed traffic. The San Francisco Chronicle first reported on the letter.

The events, he said in the letter, “demonstrated that California’s current regulatory framework does not adequately address how autonomous vehicles operate during major incidents, planned or not. California’s challenge now is not just whether autonomous vehicles can operate safely under normal conditions, but also whether they can perform reliably during extraordinary ones.”

Lurie said autonomous vehicle manufacturers should be able to demonstrate four “core operational capabilities” and asked the California Department of Transportation to establish statewide standards to prevent future problems like the July 4 gridlock incident.

Under Lurie’s vision, companies would be required to immediately remove or relocate robotaxis from active travel lanes to keep people moving and be required to be able to adapt in real time, adjusting their routes, service area, and pickup and drop-off locations. Companies would also have to share real-time operations data with local agencies, including service disruptions, the locations of immobile robotaxis, and recovery efforts as well as demonstrate through testing that they can handle large influxes of people and traffic.

TechCrunch has reached out to Waymo for comment. The article will be updated once the company responds.

Any company that wants to operate a robotaxi service in California has to successfully navigate two testing and deployment permit processes, one administered by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles and the other by the Public Utilities Commission. California’s existing regulatory framework is stricter than that of other states like Texas and Arizona, but that hasn’t dissuaded companies from trying to operate there.

San Francisco and the wider area that stretches south into Silicon Valley have long been a testbed for autonomous vehicle technology. Six companies, including Nuro, Waymo, and Zoox, hold driverless testing permits, which allow the vehicles to drive without a human safety operator behind the wheel.

But the area has also become the launch point for commercial services, which requires other permits from the DMV and CPUC.

Waymo is the largest, with an estimated 1,000 robotaxis operating in the Bay Area today. But there are plenty of others either testing or poised to launch commercial operations, including Amazon-owned Zoox as well as a premium robotaxi service that will be operated by Uber. Tesla has a branded robotaxi service but it doesn’t use driverless vehicles, nor does it have the permits to do so. Instead, Tesla has a charter transportation permit, which allows its own drivers to pick up and drop off riders throughout San Francisco in vehicles equipped with its advanced driver-assistance system rather than fully autonomous software.

Waymo’s scale has made it the focal point for regulators in San Francisco and beyond. The company now operates in 11 cities and has said it completes more than 500,000 paid rides every week. In San Francisco, Lurie noted that Waymo had agreed to restrict its service on July 4 near the waterfront and had even assigned a representative to the city’s emergency center. But that wasn’t enough to keep the Waymos out of the heavy traffic that occurred outside of that district.

Lurie said these voluntary actions are no longer enough — a reflection of just how big Waymo’s fleet has become. He said the four proposed requirements “will not undermine autonomous vehicles; they will strengthen them.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#San #Francisco #mayor #pushes #tougher #rules #Waymo #traffic #fiasco #TechCrunchrobotaxis,Waymo">San Francisco mayor pushes for tougher rules after the Waymo traffic fiasco | TechCrunch

It turns out that even San Francisco mayor Daniel Lurie, who once declared that the city should be a testbed for emerging tech, has his limits. Especially when that emerging tech creates a massive hours-long traffic jam that leaves thousands at a standstill.

Mayor Lurie has asked state regulators to bolster rules for autonomous vehicles nearly two weeks after Waymo robotaxis became immobile in heavy July 4 traffic, ran out of power, and blocked key streets, further compounding the gridlock. The traffic jam, which trapped municipal shuttles, became a citywide problem that affected thousands of people.

In his letter to the state Department of Transportation, which was viewed by TechCrunch, Lurie pointed to two events — a widespread power outage in December and the Golden Gate Bridge fireworks show on July 4 that attracted 100,000 spectators — both of which led to dozens of stranded Waymo vehicles and paralyzed traffic. The San Francisco Chronicle first reported on the letter.

The events, he said in the letter, “demonstrated that California’s current regulatory framework does not adequately address how autonomous vehicles operate during major incidents, planned or not. California’s challenge now is not just whether autonomous vehicles can operate safely under normal conditions, but also whether they can perform reliably during extraordinary ones.”

Lurie said autonomous vehicle manufacturers should be able to demonstrate four “core operational capabilities” and asked the California Department of Transportation to establish statewide standards to prevent future problems like the July 4 gridlock incident.

Under Lurie’s vision, companies would be required to immediately remove or relocate robotaxis from active travel lanes to keep people moving and be required to be able to adapt in real time, adjusting their routes, service area, and pickup and drop-off locations. Companies would also have to share real-time operations data with local agencies, including service disruptions, the locations of immobile robotaxis, and recovery efforts as well as demonstrate through testing that they can handle large influxes of people and traffic.

TechCrunch has reached out to Waymo for comment. The article will be updated once the company responds.

Any company that wants to operate a robotaxi service in California has to successfully navigate two testing and deployment permit processes, one administered by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles and the other by the Public Utilities Commission. California’s existing regulatory framework is stricter than that of other states like Texas and Arizona, but that hasn’t dissuaded companies from trying to operate there.

San Francisco and the wider area that stretches south into Silicon Valley have long been a testbed for autonomous vehicle technology. Six companies, including Nuro, Waymo, and Zoox, hold driverless testing permits, which allow the vehicles to drive without a human safety operator behind the wheel.

But the area has also become the launch point for commercial services, which requires other permits from the DMV and CPUC.

Waymo is the largest, with an estimated 1,000 robotaxis operating in the Bay Area today. But there are plenty of others either testing or poised to launch commercial operations, including Amazon-owned Zoox as well as a premium robotaxi service that will be operated by Uber. Tesla has a branded robotaxi service but it doesn’t use driverless vehicles, nor does it have the permits to do so. Instead, Tesla has a charter transportation permit, which allows its own drivers to pick up and drop off riders throughout San Francisco in vehicles equipped with its advanced driver-assistance system rather than fully autonomous software.

Waymo’s scale has made it the focal point for regulators in San Francisco and beyond. The company now operates in 11 cities and has said it completes more than 500,000 paid rides every week. In San Francisco, Lurie noted that Waymo had agreed to restrict its service on July 4 near the waterfront and had even assigned a representative to the city’s emergency center. But that wasn’t enough to keep the Waymos out of the heavy traffic that occurred outside of that district.

Lurie said these voluntary actions are no longer enough — a reflection of just how big Waymo’s fleet has become. He said the four proposed requirements “will not undermine autonomous vehicles; they will strengthen them.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#San #Francisco #mayor #pushes #tougher #rules #Waymo #traffic #fiasco #TechCrunchrobotaxis,Waymo
newer iPads, it is not available on many older devices. However, you do have several options for checking your battery health. In this guide, we’ll explain how to check battery health on older iPads and share some useful tips to help extend battery life.

Which iPads Support Apple’s Built-in Battery Health Feature?

Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature for selected iPad models. If your iPad supports it, you can view important battery information in the Settings app without installing any additional apps. This feature is available for iPad Pro M4, iPad Air M2, iPad mini (A17 Pro), iPad (A16), and newer iPads.

  1. Go to Settings.
  2. Tap Battery.
  3. Open Battery Health.
    Apple Doesn’t Show Battery Health on Older iPads—Here’s How to Check It Anyway Checking your battery health will not only provide you with information about your iPad’s performance but also indicate whether you need to replace your device. Although Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature on newer iPads, it is not available on many older devices. However, you do have several options for checking your battery health. In this guide, we’ll explain how to check battery health on older iPads and share some useful tips to help extend battery life. Which iPads Support Apple’s Built-in Battery Health Feature? Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature for selected iPad models. If your iPad supports it, you can view important battery information in the Settings app without installing any additional apps. This feature is available for iPad Pro M4, iPad Air M2, iPad mini (A17 Pro), iPad (A16), and newer iPads. Go to Settings. Tap Battery. Open Battery Health. View details such as Maximum Capacity, Cycle Count, Battery Status, Manufacturing Date, First Use Date, and the 80% Charging Limit. If you have an old iPad, you won’t see the Battery Health option in the Settings menu. The reason behind this restriction remains unknown, as Apple has not disclosed it yet. The old operating system of these iPads does not even support the Battery Health menu. How to Check Battery Health on Older iPads Apple provides an online battery diagnostic process for iPads that do not have the Battery Health option. This is the proper way to diagnose your device’s battery without downloading any additional software. First, contact Apple Support and describe your battery problems, which may include rapid battery drain, slow charging, and automatic shutdowns of your iPad. Apple Support will conduct a remote battery diagnostic on your iPad. They will be able to tell you all the vital information regarding your battery. Use coconutBattery on a Mac Another way to check your iPad’s battery health is through coconutBattery. The app is available for macOS and supports Apple devices, including iPads. Download coconutBattery on your Mac. Connect your iPad via a USB cable. Launch the application. Select your device and see its battery details. It provides information on Battery Health, Current Capacity, Design Capacity, Charge Cycles, Battery Temperature, and Charging Status. Please note that some more advanced options will be available only in the paid version. Tips to Keep Your Older iPad Battery Healthy Ensure that you only use certified chargers: Your iPad should be charged by Apple-certified and MFi-certified chargers and cables. Avoid using your iPad in extreme temperatures: it should not be exposed to direct sunlight or extremely high temperatures. Keep your iPad software up to date: Update your device to the latest iPadOS. Screen lock: Locking your iPad helps conserve battery power. Airplane mode in areas with poor signal: If the signal strength is low, activate airplane mode to conserve battery. Wi-Fi connection: Connect to Wi-Fi whenever it is possible. Unplug unnecessary devices: Unplug any USB-C device that is no longer needed. #Apple #Doesnt #Show #Battery #Health #Older #iPadsHeres #Checkapple
  4. View details such as Maximum Capacity, Cycle Count, Battery Status, Manufacturing Date, First Use Date, and the 80% Charging Limit.

If you have an old iPad, you won’t see the Battery Health option in the Settings menu. The reason behind this restriction remains unknown, as Apple has not disclosed it yet. The old operating system of these iPads does not even support the Battery Health menu.

How to Check Battery Health on Older iPads

ipad

Apple provides an online battery diagnostic process for iPads that do not have the Battery Health option. This is the proper way to diagnose your device’s battery without downloading any additional software. First, contact Apple Support and describe your battery problems, which may include rapid battery drain, slow charging, and automatic shutdowns of your iPad. Apple Support will conduct a remote battery diagnostic on your iPad. They will be able to tell you all the vital information regarding your battery.

Use coconutBattery on a Mac

Another way to check your iPad’s battery health is through coconutBattery. The app is available for macOS and supports Apple devices, including iPads.

  • Download coconutBattery on your Mac.
  • Connect your iPad via a USB cable.
  • Launch the application.
  • Select your device and see its battery details.
    Use coconutBattery on a Mac to check battery health

It provides information on Battery Health, Current Capacity, Design Capacity, Charge Cycles, Battery Temperature, and Charging Status. Please note that some more advanced options will be available only in the paid version.

Tips to Keep Your Older iPad Battery Healthy

  1. Ensure that you only use certified chargers: Your iPad should be charged by Apple-certified and MFi-certified chargers and cables.
  2. Avoid using your iPad in extreme temperatures: it should not be exposed to direct sunlight or extremely high temperatures.
  3. Keep your iPad software up to date: Update your device to the latest iPadOS.
  4. Screen lock: Locking your iPad helps conserve battery power.
  5. Airplane mode in areas with poor signal: If the signal strength is low, activate airplane mode to conserve battery.
  6. Wi-Fi connection: Connect to Wi-Fi whenever it is possible.
  7. Unplug unnecessary devices: Unplug any USB-C device that is no longer needed.
#Apple #Doesnt #Show #Battery #Health #Older #iPadsHeres #Checkapple">Apple Doesn’t Show Battery Health on Older iPads—Here’s How to Check It Anyway Checking your battery health will not only provide you with information about your iPad’s performance but also indicate whether you need to replace your device. Although Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature on newer iPads, it is not available on many older devices. However, you do have several options for checking your battery health. In this guide, we’ll explain how to check battery health on older iPads and share some useful tips to help extend battery life. Which iPads Support Apple’s Built-in Battery Health Feature? Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature for selected iPad models. If your iPad supports it, you can view important battery information in the Settings app without installing any additional apps. This feature is available for iPad Pro M4, iPad Air M2, iPad mini (A17 Pro), iPad (A16), and newer iPads. Go to Settings. Tap Battery. Open Battery Health. View details such as Maximum Capacity, Cycle Count, Battery Status, Manufacturing Date, First Use Date, and the 80% Charging Limit. If you have an old iPad, you won’t see the Battery Health option in the Settings menu. The reason behind this restriction remains unknown, as Apple has not disclosed it yet. The old operating system of these iPads does not even support the Battery Health menu. How to Check Battery Health on Older iPads Apple provides an online battery diagnostic process for iPads that do not have the Battery Health option. This is the proper way to diagnose your device’s battery without downloading any additional software. First, contact Apple Support and describe your battery problems, which may include rapid battery drain, slow charging, and automatic shutdowns of your iPad. Apple Support will conduct a remote battery diagnostic on your iPad. They will be able to tell you all the vital information regarding your battery. Use coconutBattery on a Mac Another way to check your iPad’s battery health is through coconutBattery. The app is available for macOS and supports Apple devices, including iPads. Download coconutBattery on your Mac. Connect your iPad via a USB cable. Launch the application. Select your device and see its battery details. It provides information on Battery Health, Current Capacity, Design Capacity, Charge Cycles, Battery Temperature, and Charging Status. Please note that some more advanced options will be available only in the paid version. Tips to Keep Your Older iPad Battery Healthy Ensure that you only use certified chargers: Your iPad should be charged by Apple-certified and MFi-certified chargers and cables. Avoid using your iPad in extreme temperatures: it should not be exposed to direct sunlight or extremely high temperatures. Keep your iPad software up to date: Update your device to the latest iPadOS. Screen lock: Locking your iPad helps conserve battery power. Airplane mode in areas with poor signal: If the signal strength is low, activate airplane mode to conserve battery. Wi-Fi connection: Connect to Wi-Fi whenever it is possible. Unplug unnecessary devices: Unplug any USB-C device that is no longer needed. #Apple #Doesnt #Show #Battery #Health #Older #iPadsHeres #Checkapple

, it is not available on many older devices. However, you do have several options for checking your battery health. In this guide, we’ll explain how to check battery health on older iPads and share some useful tips to help extend battery life.

Which iPads Support Apple’s Built-in Battery Health Feature?

Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature for selected iPad models. If your iPad supports it, you can view important battery information in the Settings app without installing any additional apps. This feature is available for iPad Pro M4, iPad Air M2, iPad mini (A17 Pro), iPad (A16), and newer iPads.

  1. Go to Settings.
  2. Tap Battery.
  3. Open Battery Health.
    Apple Doesn’t Show Battery Health on Older iPads—Here’s How to Check It Anyway Checking your battery health will not only provide you with information about your iPad’s performance but also indicate whether you need to replace your device. Although Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature on newer iPads, it is not available on many older devices. However, you do have several options for checking your battery health. In this guide, we’ll explain how to check battery health on older iPads and share some useful tips to help extend battery life. Which iPads Support Apple’s Built-in Battery Health Feature? Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature for selected iPad models. If your iPad supports it, you can view important battery information in the Settings app without installing any additional apps. This feature is available for iPad Pro M4, iPad Air M2, iPad mini (A17 Pro), iPad (A16), and newer iPads. Go to Settings. Tap Battery. Open Battery Health. View details such as Maximum Capacity, Cycle Count, Battery Status, Manufacturing Date, First Use Date, and the 80% Charging Limit. If you have an old iPad, you won’t see the Battery Health option in the Settings menu. The reason behind this restriction remains unknown, as Apple has not disclosed it yet. The old operating system of these iPads does not even support the Battery Health menu. How to Check Battery Health on Older iPads Apple provides an online battery diagnostic process for iPads that do not have the Battery Health option. This is the proper way to diagnose your device’s battery without downloading any additional software. First, contact Apple Support and describe your battery problems, which may include rapid battery drain, slow charging, and automatic shutdowns of your iPad. Apple Support will conduct a remote battery diagnostic on your iPad. They will be able to tell you all the vital information regarding your battery. Use coconutBattery on a Mac Another way to check your iPad’s battery health is through coconutBattery. The app is available for macOS and supports Apple devices, including iPads. Download coconutBattery on your Mac. Connect your iPad via a USB cable. Launch the application. Select your device and see its battery details. It provides information on Battery Health, Current Capacity, Design Capacity, Charge Cycles, Battery Temperature, and Charging Status. Please note that some more advanced options will be available only in the paid version. Tips to Keep Your Older iPad Battery Healthy Ensure that you only use certified chargers: Your iPad should be charged by Apple-certified and MFi-certified chargers and cables. Avoid using your iPad in extreme temperatures: it should not be exposed to direct sunlight or extremely high temperatures. Keep your iPad software up to date: Update your device to the latest iPadOS. Screen lock: Locking your iPad helps conserve battery power. Airplane mode in areas with poor signal: If the signal strength is low, activate airplane mode to conserve battery. Wi-Fi connection: Connect to Wi-Fi whenever it is possible. Unplug unnecessary devices: Unplug any USB-C device that is no longer needed. #Apple #Doesnt #Show #Battery #Health #Older #iPadsHeres #Checkapple
  4. View details such as Maximum Capacity, Cycle Count, Battery Status, Manufacturing Date, First Use Date, and the 80% Charging Limit.

If you have an old iPad, you won’t see the Battery Health option in the Settings menu. The reason behind this restriction remains unknown, as Apple has not disclosed it yet. The old operating system of these iPads does not even support the Battery Health menu.

How to Check Battery Health on Older iPads

ipad

Apple provides an online battery diagnostic process for iPads that do not have the Battery Health option. This is the proper way to diagnose your device’s battery without downloading any additional software. First, contact Apple Support and describe your battery problems, which may include rapid battery drain, slow charging, and automatic shutdowns of your iPad. Apple Support will conduct a remote battery diagnostic on your iPad. They will be able to tell you all the vital information regarding your battery.

Use coconutBattery on a Mac

Another way to check your iPad’s battery health is through coconutBattery. The app is available for macOS and supports Apple devices, including iPads.

  • Download coconutBattery on your Mac.
  • Connect your iPad via a USB cable.
  • Launch the application.
  • Select your device and see its battery details.
    Use coconutBattery on a Mac to check battery health

It provides information on Battery Health, Current Capacity, Design Capacity, Charge Cycles, Battery Temperature, and Charging Status. Please note that some more advanced options will be available only in the paid version.

Tips to Keep Your Older iPad Battery Healthy

  1. Ensure that you only use certified chargers: Your iPad should be charged by Apple-certified and MFi-certified chargers and cables.
  2. Avoid using your iPad in extreme temperatures: it should not be exposed to direct sunlight or extremely high temperatures.
  3. Keep your iPad software up to date: Update your device to the latest iPadOS.
  4. Screen lock: Locking your iPad helps conserve battery power.
  5. Airplane mode in areas with poor signal: If the signal strength is low, activate airplane mode to conserve battery.
  6. Wi-Fi connection: Connect to Wi-Fi whenever it is possible.
  7. Unplug unnecessary devices: Unplug any USB-C device that is no longer needed.
#Apple #Doesnt #Show #Battery #Health #Older #iPadsHeres #Checkapple">Apple Doesn’t Show Battery Health on Older iPads—Here’s How to Check It Anyway

Checking your battery health will not only provide you with information about your iPad’s performance but also indicate whether you need to replace your device. Although Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature on newer iPads, it is not available on many older devices. However, you do have several options for checking your battery health. In this guide, we’ll explain how to check battery health on older iPads and share some useful tips to help extend battery life.

Which iPads Support Apple’s Built-in Battery Health Feature?

Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature for selected iPad models. If your iPad supports it, you can view important battery information in the Settings app without installing any additional apps. This feature is available for iPad Pro M4, iPad Air M2, iPad mini (A17 Pro), iPad (A16), and newer iPads.

  1. Go to Settings.
  2. Tap Battery.
  3. Open Battery Health.
    Apple Doesn’t Show Battery Health on Older iPads—Here’s How to Check It Anyway Checking your battery health will not only provide you with information about your iPad’s performance but also indicate whether you need to replace your device. Although Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature on newer iPads, it is not available on many older devices. However, you do have several options for checking your battery health. In this guide, we’ll explain how to check battery health on older iPads and share some useful tips to help extend battery life. Which iPads Support Apple’s Built-in Battery Health Feature? Apple provides a built-in Battery Health feature for selected iPad models. If your iPad supports it, you can view important battery information in the Settings app without installing any additional apps. This feature is available for iPad Pro M4, iPad Air M2, iPad mini (A17 Pro), iPad (A16), and newer iPads. Go to Settings. Tap Battery. Open Battery Health. View details such as Maximum Capacity, Cycle Count, Battery Status, Manufacturing Date, First Use Date, and the 80% Charging Limit. If you have an old iPad, you won’t see the Battery Health option in the Settings menu. The reason behind this restriction remains unknown, as Apple has not disclosed it yet. The old operating system of these iPads does not even support the Battery Health menu. How to Check Battery Health on Older iPads Apple provides an online battery diagnostic process for iPads that do not have the Battery Health option. This is the proper way to diagnose your device’s battery without downloading any additional software. First, contact Apple Support and describe your battery problems, which may include rapid battery drain, slow charging, and automatic shutdowns of your iPad. Apple Support will conduct a remote battery diagnostic on your iPad. They will be able to tell you all the vital information regarding your battery. Use coconutBattery on a Mac Another way to check your iPad’s battery health is through coconutBattery. The app is available for macOS and supports Apple devices, including iPads. Download coconutBattery on your Mac. Connect your iPad via a USB cable. Launch the application. Select your device and see its battery details. It provides information on Battery Health, Current Capacity, Design Capacity, Charge Cycles, Battery Temperature, and Charging Status. Please note that some more advanced options will be available only in the paid version. Tips to Keep Your Older iPad Battery Healthy Ensure that you only use certified chargers: Your iPad should be charged by Apple-certified and MFi-certified chargers and cables. Avoid using your iPad in extreme temperatures: it should not be exposed to direct sunlight or extremely high temperatures. Keep your iPad software up to date: Update your device to the latest iPadOS. Screen lock: Locking your iPad helps conserve battery power. Airplane mode in areas with poor signal: If the signal strength is low, activate airplane mode to conserve battery. Wi-Fi connection: Connect to Wi-Fi whenever it is possible. Unplug unnecessary devices: Unplug any USB-C device that is no longer needed. #Apple #Doesnt #Show #Battery #Health #Older #iPadsHeres #Checkapple
  4. View details such as Maximum Capacity, Cycle Count, Battery Status, Manufacturing Date, First Use Date, and the 80% Charging Limit.

If you have an old iPad, you won’t see the Battery Health option in the Settings menu. The reason behind this restriction remains unknown, as Apple has not disclosed it yet. The old operating system of these iPads does not even support the Battery Health menu.

How to Check Battery Health on Older iPads

ipad

Apple provides an online battery diagnostic process for iPads that do not have the Battery Health option. This is the proper way to diagnose your device’s battery without downloading any additional software. First, contact Apple Support and describe your battery problems, which may include rapid battery drain, slow charging, and automatic shutdowns of your iPad. Apple Support will conduct a remote battery diagnostic on your iPad. They will be able to tell you all the vital information regarding your battery.

Use coconutBattery on a Mac

Another way to check your iPad’s battery health is through coconutBattery. The app is available for macOS and supports Apple devices, including iPads.

  • Download coconutBattery on your Mac.
  • Connect your iPad via a USB cable.
  • Launch the application.
  • Select your device and see its battery details.
    Use coconutBattery on a Mac to check battery health

It provides information on Battery Health, Current Capacity, Design Capacity, Charge Cycles, Battery Temperature, and Charging Status. Please note that some more advanced options will be available only in the paid version.

Tips to Keep Your Older iPad Battery Healthy

  1. Ensure that you only use certified chargers: Your iPad should be charged by Apple-certified and MFi-certified chargers and cables.
  2. Avoid using your iPad in extreme temperatures: it should not be exposed to direct sunlight or extremely high temperatures.
  3. Keep your iPad software up to date: Update your device to the latest iPadOS.
  4. Screen lock: Locking your iPad helps conserve battery power.
  5. Airplane mode in areas with poor signal: If the signal strength is low, activate airplane mode to conserve battery.
  6. Wi-Fi connection: Connect to Wi-Fi whenever it is possible.
  7. Unplug unnecessary devices: Unplug any USB-C device that is no longer needed.
#Apple #Doesnt #Show #Battery #Health #Older #iPadsHeres #Checkapple

Post Comment