×
Deadspin | Court rules against San Diego State in landmark Title IX case  Dec 18, 2020; San Diego, California, USA; A detailed view of the San Diego State Aztecs logo at midcourt before the game against the Brigham Young Cougars at Viejas Arena. Mandatory Credit: Orlando Ramirez-Imagn Images   San Diego State must pay a group of former female athletes at the university a total of 0,000 for violating federal law, U.S. District Judge Todd Robinson ruled.  The ex-athletes and the school agreed to an out-of-court settlement in the case last year, which focused on whether San Diego State violated Title IX anti-discrimination laws. Robinson signed off on the agreement on Monday in San Diego.  San Diego State also agreed to pay .3 million in legal fees to the attorneys who saw the case through the court system for the plaintffs.  All of the women were scholar-athletes with the Aztecs in a time span from 2018 moving forward.  The women filed the lawsuit in 2022, accusing the school of giving more money to the male athletes. San Diego State officials declined that was true nd decided to fight it.  “SDSU intentionally chose not to fund women’s sports for the full amount of aid permitted by the NCAA’s rules,” read the lawsuit. “It likewise intentionally chose not to permit the coaches of women’s teams to award the full amount of aid permitted by the NCAA’s rules. Those decisions harmed all Plaintiffs. The same dollar limits were not placed on many of SDSU’s men’s teams, including, for example, the men’s football team.”   In all, each of the 798 women who took part in the class-action lawsuit will receive a sum of money that won’t be life-changing by any means; each share is about 5. But Arthur Bryant, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said this case was about much more than money.  “These women have made history,” Bryant told USA Today on Monday. “This is the first case ever in which a school is going to pay damages to women athletes for depriving them of equal athletic financial aid. It is definitely not going to be the last. And SDSU is going to comply with Title IX.”  The university also said it would provide equipment and off-field services to women that equal what the men get. In this case, San Diego State agreed to put replacement turf of the field used by women’s lacrosse and to provide “professional photography services and publicity equitably to men’s and women’s teams.”  San Diego State has 30 days to pay the money due.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Court #rules #San #Diego #State #landmark #Title #case

Deadspin | Court rules against San Diego State in landmark Title IX case
Deadspin | Court rules against San Diego State in landmark Title IX case  Dec 18, 2020; San Diego, California, USA; A detailed view of the San Diego State Aztecs logo at midcourt before the game against the Brigham Young Cougars at Viejas Arena. Mandatory Credit: Orlando Ramirez-Imagn Images   San Diego State must pay a group of former female athletes at the university a total of 0,000 for violating federal law, U.S. District Judge Todd Robinson ruled.  The ex-athletes and the school agreed to an out-of-court settlement in the case last year, which focused on whether San Diego State violated Title IX anti-discrimination laws. Robinson signed off on the agreement on Monday in San Diego.  San Diego State also agreed to pay .3 million in legal fees to the attorneys who saw the case through the court system for the plaintffs.  All of the women were scholar-athletes with the Aztecs in a time span from 2018 moving forward.  The women filed the lawsuit in 2022, accusing the school of giving more money to the male athletes. San Diego State officials declined that was true nd decided to fight it.  “SDSU intentionally chose not to fund women’s sports for the full amount of aid permitted by the NCAA’s rules,” read the lawsuit. “It likewise intentionally chose not to permit the coaches of women’s teams to award the full amount of aid permitted by the NCAA’s rules. Those decisions harmed all Plaintiffs. The same dollar limits were not placed on many of SDSU’s men’s teams, including, for example, the men’s football team.”   In all, each of the 798 women who took part in the class-action lawsuit will receive a sum of money that won’t be life-changing by any means; each share is about 5. But Arthur Bryant, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said this case was about much more than money.  “These women have made history,” Bryant told USA Today on Monday. “This is the first case ever in which a school is going to pay damages to women athletes for depriving them of equal athletic financial aid. It is definitely not going to be the last. And SDSU is going to comply with Title IX.”  The university also said it would provide equipment and off-field services to women that equal what the men get. In this case, San Diego State agreed to put replacement turf of the field used by women’s lacrosse and to provide “professional photography services and publicity equitably to men’s and women’s teams.”  San Diego State has 30 days to pay the money due.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Court #rules #San #Diego #State #landmark #Title #caseDec 18, 2020; San Diego, California, USA; A detailed view of the San Diego State Aztecs logo at midcourt before the game against the Brigham Young Cougars at Viejas Arena. Mandatory Credit: Orlando Ramirez-Imagn Images

San Diego State must pay a group of former female athletes at the university a total of $300,000 for violating federal law, U.S. District Judge Todd Robinson ruled.

The ex-athletes and the school agreed to an out-of-court settlement in the case last year, which focused on whether San Diego State violated Title IX anti-discrimination laws. Robinson signed off on the agreement on Monday in San Diego.

San Diego State also agreed to pay $1.3 million in legal fees to the attorneys who saw the case through the court system for the plaintffs.

All of the women were scholar-athletes with the Aztecs in a time span from 2018 moving forward.

The women filed the lawsuit in 2022, accusing the school of giving more money to the male athletes. San Diego State officials declined that was true nd decided to fight it.


“SDSU intentionally chose not to fund women’s sports for the full amount of aid permitted by the NCAA’s rules,” read the lawsuit. “It likewise intentionally chose not to permit the coaches of women’s teams to award the full amount of aid permitted by the NCAA’s rules. Those decisions harmed all Plaintiffs. The same dollar limits were not placed on many of SDSU’s men’s teams, including, for example, the men’s football team.”

In all, each of the 798 women who took part in the class-action lawsuit will receive a sum of money that won’t be life-changing by any means; each share is about $375. But Arthur Bryant, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said this case was about much more than money.

“These women have made history,” Bryant told USA Today on Monday. “This is the first case ever in which a school is going to pay damages to women athletes for depriving them of equal athletic financial aid. It is definitely not going to be the last. And SDSU is going to comply with Title IX.”

The university also said it would provide equipment and off-field services to women that equal what the men get. In this case, San Diego State agreed to put replacement turf of the field used by women’s lacrosse and to provide “professional photography services and publicity equitably to men’s and women’s teams.”

San Diego State has 30 days to pay the money due.

–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Court #rules #San #Diego #State #landmark #Title #case

Dec 18, 2020; San Diego, California, USA; A detailed view of the San Diego State Aztecs logo at midcourt before the game against the Brigham Young Cougars at Viejas Arena. Mandatory Credit: Orlando Ramirez-Imagn Images

San Diego State must pay a group of former female athletes at the university a total of $300,000 for violating federal law, U.S. District Judge Todd Robinson ruled.

The ex-athletes and the school agreed to an out-of-court settlement in the case last year, which focused on whether San Diego State violated Title IX anti-discrimination laws. Robinson signed off on the agreement on Monday in San Diego.

San Diego State also agreed to pay $1.3 million in legal fees to the attorneys who saw the case through the court system for the plaintffs.

All of the women were scholar-athletes with the Aztecs in a time span from 2018 moving forward.

The women filed the lawsuit in 2022, accusing the school of giving more money to the male athletes. San Diego State officials declined that was true nd decided to fight it.

“SDSU intentionally chose not to fund women’s sports for the full amount of aid permitted by the NCAA’s rules,” read the lawsuit. “It likewise intentionally chose not to permit the coaches of women’s teams to award the full amount of aid permitted by the NCAA’s rules. Those decisions harmed all Plaintiffs. The same dollar limits were not placed on many of SDSU’s men’s teams, including, for example, the men’s football team.”

In all, each of the 798 women who took part in the class-action lawsuit will receive a sum of money that won’t be life-changing by any means; each share is about $375. But Arthur Bryant, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said this case was about much more than money.

“These women have made history,” Bryant told USA Today on Monday. “This is the first case ever in which a school is going to pay damages to women athletes for depriving them of equal athletic financial aid. It is definitely not going to be the last. And SDSU is going to comply with Title IX.”

The university also said it would provide equipment and off-field services to women that equal what the men get. In this case, San Diego State agreed to put replacement turf of the field used by women’s lacrosse and to provide “professional photography services and publicity equitably to men’s and women’s teams.”

San Diego State has 30 days to pay the money due.

–Field Level Media

Source link
#Deadspin #Court #rules #San #Diego #State #landmark #Title #case

Previous post

Oklahoma City Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander named NBA’s top clutch performer <div id="content-body-70891285" itemprop="articleBody"><p>Oklahoma City Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was the runaway winner in the Clutch Player of ​the Year award balloting, revealed Tuesday night.</p><p>Gilgeous-Alexander ‌received 96 of 100 first-place votes in ​balloting for the Jerry West Trophy. ⁠He had 484 total points, well ahead of Denver Nuggets standout Jamal Murray (117) and Minnesota Timberwolves star ‌Anthony Edwards (116).</p><p>Gilgeous-Alexander is the reigning league MVP and is favoured to win ‌the award again this season.</p><p>But he liked ‌receiving ⁠the Jerry West Trophy too.</p><p>“This award ⁠means a lot,” Gilgeous-Alexander said of the Clutch Player award on NBC Sports. “To get this award, you have ​to help your ‌team win games late and what I’m about more than anything is winning games.”</p><p>Gilgeous-Alexander led the NBA with 175 points that occurred ‌in clutch time, defined as games that ​were within five points in the final five minutes of regulation or overtime.</p><p>He ⁠shot 60.9 per cent from the field (39 of 64) during clutch time and made a league- best ‌16 go-ahead field goals.</p><p>Fourth-place Cade Cunningham (50 points) of the Detroit Pistons received one first-place vote, fifth-place Jalen Brunson (42 points) of the New York Knicks landed two and sixth-place Nikola Jokic (37 points) of Denver received one.</p><p>This was ‌the fourth season in which the award was given ​out.</p><p>De’Aaron Fox (then with the Sacramento Kings) won the 2023 award, followed ⁠by Stephen Curry of the Golden State Warriors in ⁠2024 and Brunson last season. Fox now plays for the San Antonio Spurs.</p><p>West ‌was known as “Mr. Clutch” during his stellar career (1960-74) with the Los Angeles Lakers due ​to his many late-game exploits. He died in 2024.</p><p class="publish-time" id="end-of-article">Published on Apr 22, 2026</p></div> #Oklahoma #City #Thunder #star #Shai #GilgeousAlexander #named #NBAs #top #clutch #performer

Next post

Users of ‘spot work’ app sues service over last-minute cancellations<div> <p>Users of Timee’s short-term job app filed a collective lawsuit against the Japanese staffing service at the Tokyo District Court on Tuesday, arguing that last-minute cancellations of “spot work” contracts were illegal.</p><p>Nine users from five prefectures, including Tokyo and Aichi, demanded a total of ¥3.12 million ($19,600) in unpaid wages and damages. According to their lawyers, it is the first suit aimed at holding a job intermediary responsible for last-minute cancellations.</p><p>According to the complaint, the nine plaintiffs applied for work at employers such as an eatery and a hotel between October 2021 and March 2026 on the Timee app. Although their applications were accepted by employers, their contracts were canceled right before the day of work a total of 135 times, and they were not paid wages or reimbursed for transportation expenses.</p><p>The plaintiffs argue that their employment contracts were formed when they were matched with employers on the Timee app, making unilateral dismissals by employers invalid. They also accuse Timee of neglecting its duty of care to prevent illegal last-minute cancellations.</p><p>“I think it’s unreasonable,” a plaintiff in his 60s told a news conference in Tokyo after filing the lawsuit. “I hope (users’) feelings will be understood, even just a little.”</p><p>Timee declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it has not received the complaint and cannot confirm the facts.</p> </div>#Users #spot #work #app #sues #service #lastminute #cancellationsJapanese courts, Timee, nonregular workers, jobs, apps

When I arrived to cover the Minnesota Vikings for the St. Paul Pioneer Press in 2000, it was clear I was dealing with a star-studded roster.

The team boasted future Pro Football Hall of Famers; wide receivers Cris Carter and Randy Moss and defensive tackle John Randle. Plus, there were a ton of other stars including quarterback Daunte Culpepper, center Matt Birk and running back Robert Smith. The Vikings were loaded with star power.

The talent around the team wasn’t relegated simply to the roster, however.

That summer I first laid my eyes on a 16-year-old high school junior named Larry Fitzgerald Jr. The son of a local media member and close friend of Vikings’ head coach Dennis Green, Little Fitzy was a ball boy during training camp and on game days. It turns out, Larry Fitzgerald Jr. is very likely the most famous former NFL ball boy in history.

On reporting date, fellow reporter Kevin Seifert pointed out Fitzgerald to me and said “that’s a bad man.” Seifert didn’t say that about any of the actual Vikings that day.

Fitzgerald was already known as the best Minnesota high school prospect in years and he was considered one of the best high school players in the country. Seifert told me the buzz was that the kid was, no doubt, headed to the NFL in a half decade or so. Seifert was on the money. I’m not sure the Hall of Fame was mentioned or not.

But this weekend of course, that’s exactly where Little Fitzy is headed. He will be enshrined into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio, on Saturday as a first-ballot Hall of Famer.

Fitzgerald will be remembered as one of the best and most productive wide receivers in league history after an incredible 17-season career with the Arizona Cardinals.

I have a ton of memories of being around Fitzgerald, but there’s one that stands out among them all.

One day after training camp, a nameless Vikings’ wide receiver camp body was getting extra work on a JUGS machine, catching balls. He was being tutored by Fitzgerald, who was showing this player how to properly approach the incoming ball. This was a child instructing a grown man an NFL team deemed good enough to attend training camp.

Larry Fitzgerald Jr. was special even back then.

In addition to his incredible natural football ability, Larry Fitzgerald Jr. stood out for his politeness and good nature. You could tell he was a good kid from the first time you met him.

There was no I’m-going-to-be-a-star attitude. He was genuine and he worked his tail off with the rest of the ball boys. There was no entitlement. It was as if he was using his time around an NFL camp as an internship for his future. He passed with flying colors.

I’ve always cherished following his career from his days at Pittsburgh in college to his days of dominating the NFL and I’ve enjoyed running into him over the years now and again.

Enjoy Canton, Little Fitzy, you’ve earned it.

#Larry #Fitzgeralds #Hall #Fame #induction #years #making">Larry Fitzgerald’s Hall of Fame induction is 25 years in the making  When I arrived to cover the Minnesota Vikings for the St. Paul Pioneer Press in 2000, it was clear I was dealing with a star-studded roster.The team boasted future Pro Football Hall of Famers; wide receivers Cris Carter and Randy Moss and defensive tackle John Randle. Plus, there were a ton of other stars including quarterback Daunte Culpepper, center Matt Birk and running back Robert Smith. The Vikings were loaded with star power.The talent around the team wasn’t relegated simply to the roster, however.That summer I first laid my eyes on a 16-year-old high school junior named Larry Fitzgerald Jr. The son of a local media member and close friend of Vikings’ head coach Dennis Green, Little Fitzy was a ball boy during training camp and on game days. It turns out, Larry Fitzgerald Jr. is very likely the most famous former NFL ball boy in history.On reporting date, fellow reporter Kevin Seifert pointed out Fitzgerald to me and said “that’s a bad man.” Seifert didn’t say that about any of the actual Vikings that day.Fitzgerald was already known as the best Minnesota high school prospect in years and he was considered one of the best high school players in the country. Seifert told me the buzz was that the kid was, no doubt, headed to the NFL in a half decade or so. Seifert was on the money. I’m not sure the Hall of Fame was mentioned or not.But this weekend of course, that’s exactly where Little Fitzy is headed. He will be enshrined into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio, on Saturday as a first-ballot Hall of Famer.Fitzgerald will be remembered as one of the best and most productive wide receivers in league history after an incredible 17-season career with the Arizona Cardinals.I have a ton of memories of being around Fitzgerald, but there’s one that stands out among them all.One day after training camp, a nameless Vikings’ wide receiver camp body was getting extra work on a JUGS machine, catching balls. He was being tutored by Fitzgerald, who was showing this player how to properly approach the incoming ball. This was a child instructing a grown man an NFL team deemed good enough to attend training camp.Larry Fitzgerald Jr. was special even back then.In addition to his incredible natural football ability, Larry Fitzgerald Jr. stood out for his politeness and good nature. You could tell he was a good kid from the first time you met him.There was no I’m-going-to-be-a-star attitude. He was genuine and he worked his tail off with the rest of the ball boys. There was no entitlement. It was as if he was using his time around an NFL camp as an internship for his future. He passed with flying colors.I’ve always cherished following his career from his days at Pittsburgh in college to his days of dominating the NFL and I’ve enjoyed running into him over the years now and again.Enjoy Canton, Little Fitzy, you’ve earned it.  #Larry #Fitzgeralds #Hall #Fame #induction #years #making

Follow Sportstar for extensive coverage of the tenth edition of the TNPL, from live scores and match reports to exclusive analysis and features.

TOSS

Tiruppur Tamizhans won the toss and chose to bowl first.

PLAYING XIs

Nellai Royal Kings: Athish SR(w), D Santhosh Kumar, Ajitesh Guruswamy, U Mukilesh, Rithik Easwaran, Sonu Yadav(c), Muhammed Adnan Khan, Ramalingam Rohit, Emmanuel Cherian, NS Harish, Rocky Bhasker

Tiruppur Tamizhans: Tushar Raheja(w), Amit Sathvik, Pradosh Ranjan Paul, Mohamed Ali, Uthirasamy Sasidev, Ravisrinivasan Sai Kishore(c), M Mathivannan, S Mohan Prasath, R Silambarasan, Esakkimuthu A, T Natarajan

Published on Aug 09, 2026

#TNPL #Live #Allround #batting #display #propels #Nellai #Royal #Kings">TNPL 2026 Live: All-round batting display propels Nellai Royal Kings to 206/8  Follow Sportstar for extensive coverage of the tenth edition of the TNPL, from live scores and match reports to exclusive analysis and features.TOSSTiruppur Tamizhans won the toss and chose to bowl first.PLAYING XIsNellai Royal Kings: Athish SR(w), D Santhosh Kumar, Ajitesh Guruswamy, U Mukilesh, Rithik Easwaran, Sonu Yadav(c), Muhammed Adnan Khan, Ramalingam Rohit, Emmanuel Cherian, NS Harish, Rocky BhaskerTiruppur Tamizhans: Tushar Raheja(w), Amit Sathvik, Pradosh Ranjan Paul, Mohamed Ali, Uthirasamy Sasidev, Ravisrinivasan Sai Kishore(c), M Mathivannan, S Mohan Prasath, R Silambarasan, Esakkimuthu A, T NatarajanPublished on Aug 09, 2026  #TNPL #Live #Allround #batting #display #propels #Nellai #Royal #Kings

Post Comment