Deadspin | Wisconsin G John Blackwell to test portal, NBA draft interest  Mar 19, 2026; Portland, OR, USA; Wisconsin Badgers guard John Blackwell (25) passes against the High Point Panthers during the first half of a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Moda Center. Mandatory Credit: Craig Strobeck-Imagn Images   Wisconsin guard John Blackwell is entering the transfer portal with plans to gauge interest during the NBA draft process.  Blackwell told ESPN on Monday that he made the decision based on his desire to compete for a national championship.  Blackwell, a shooting guard with the Badgers, had 20-plus points in 16 of Wisconsin’s 35 total games this season. He has played a total of 105 games in his three college seasons in Madison.  He averaged a career-high 19.1 points, 5.1 rebounds and 2.3 assists. He scored 34 points against Washington in the third round of the Big Ten tournament and 31 in Wisconsin’s quarterfinals victory over Illinois.   On the season, he shot 38.9% from 3-point range. He is from Bloomfield, Mich., and Michigan State coach Tom Izzo has excessively praised Blackwell before and after their recent matchups. Blackwell would also be a fit in Ann Arbor with Big Ten regular-season champion Michigan as the Wolverines enter the 2026 national title game.  “I’m looking for a place where I can enhance my skills for the NBA and a place where I can compete for a national championship,” Blackwell said. “A place where that’s the standard and what we’re striving for.”  ESPN reported Blackwell plans to participate in pre-draft camps to test his value to NBA teams before his final decision on a new direction is made at the end of the month.  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #Wisconsin #John #Blackwell #test #portal #NBA #draft #interest

Deadspin | Wisconsin G John Blackwell to test portal, NBA draft interest
Deadspin | Wisconsin G John Blackwell to test portal, NBA draft interest  Mar 19, 2026; Portland, OR, USA; Wisconsin Badgers guard John Blackwell (25) passes against the High Point Panthers during the first half of a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Moda Center. Mandatory Credit: Craig Strobeck-Imagn Images   Wisconsin guard John Blackwell is entering the transfer portal with plans to gauge interest during the NBA draft process.  Blackwell told ESPN on Monday that he made the decision based on his desire to compete for a national championship.  Blackwell, a shooting guard with the Badgers, had 20-plus points in 16 of Wisconsin’s 35 total games this season. He has played a total of 105 games in his three college seasons in Madison.  He averaged a career-high 19.1 points, 5.1 rebounds and 2.3 assists. He scored 34 points against Washington in the third round of the Big Ten tournament and 31 in Wisconsin’s quarterfinals victory over Illinois.   On the season, he shot 38.9% from 3-point range. He is from Bloomfield, Mich., and Michigan State coach Tom Izzo has excessively praised Blackwell before and after their recent matchups. Blackwell would also be a fit in Ann Arbor with Big Ten regular-season champion Michigan as the Wolverines enter the 2026 national title game.  “I’m looking for a place where I can enhance my skills for the NBA and a place where I can compete for a national championship,” Blackwell said. “A place where that’s the standard and what we’re striving for.”  ESPN reported Blackwell plans to participate in pre-draft camps to test his value to NBA teams before his final decision on a new direction is made at the end of the month.  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #Wisconsin #John #Blackwell #test #portal #NBA #draft #interestMar 19, 2026; Portland, OR, USA; Wisconsin Badgers guard John Blackwell (25) passes against the High Point Panthers during the first half of a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Moda Center. Mandatory Credit: Craig Strobeck-Imagn Images

Wisconsin guard John Blackwell is entering the transfer portal with plans to gauge interest during the NBA draft process.

Blackwell told ESPN on Monday that he made the decision based on his desire to compete for a national championship.

Blackwell, a shooting guard with the Badgers, had 20-plus points in 16 of Wisconsin’s 35 total games this season. He has played a total of 105 games in his three college seasons in Madison.


He averaged a career-high 19.1 points, 5.1 rebounds and 2.3 assists. He scored 34 points against Washington in the third round of the Big Ten tournament and 31 in Wisconsin’s quarterfinals victory over Illinois.

On the season, he shot 38.9% from 3-point range. He is from Bloomfield, Mich., and Michigan State coach Tom Izzo has excessively praised Blackwell before and after their recent matchups. Blackwell would also be a fit in Ann Arbor with Big Ten regular-season champion Michigan as the Wolverines enter the 2026 national title game.

“I’m looking for a place where I can enhance my skills for the NBA and a place where I can compete for a national championship,” Blackwell said. “A place where that’s the standard and what we’re striving for.”

ESPN reported Blackwell plans to participate in pre-draft camps to test his value to NBA teams before his final decision on a new direction is made at the end of the month.


–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Wisconsin #John #Blackwell #test #portal #NBA #draft #interest

Mar 19, 2026; Portland, OR, USA; Wisconsin Badgers guard John Blackwell (25) passes against the High Point Panthers during the first half of a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Moda Center. Mandatory Credit: Craig Strobeck-Imagn Images

Wisconsin guard John Blackwell is entering the transfer portal with plans to gauge interest during the NBA draft process.

Blackwell told ESPN on Monday that he made the decision based on his desire to compete for a national championship.

Blackwell, a shooting guard with the Badgers, had 20-plus points in 16 of Wisconsin’s 35 total games this season. He has played a total of 105 games in his three college seasons in Madison.

He averaged a career-high 19.1 points, 5.1 rebounds and 2.3 assists. He scored 34 points against Washington in the third round of the Big Ten tournament and 31 in Wisconsin’s quarterfinals victory over Illinois.

On the season, he shot 38.9% from 3-point range. He is from Bloomfield, Mich., and Michigan State coach Tom Izzo has excessively praised Blackwell before and after their recent matchups. Blackwell would also be a fit in Ann Arbor with Big Ten regular-season champion Michigan as the Wolverines enter the 2026 national title game.

“I’m looking for a place where I can enhance my skills for the NBA and a place where I can compete for a national championship,” Blackwell said. “A place where that’s the standard and what we’re striving for.”

ESPN reported Blackwell plans to participate in pre-draft camps to test his value to NBA teams before his final decision on a new direction is made at the end of the month.

–Field Level Media

Source link
#Deadspin #Wisconsin #John #Blackwell #test #portal #NBA #draft #interest

Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season">NFL starting QBs ranked by analytics before 2026 season  Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.  #NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season

ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season">NFL starting QBs ranked by analytics before 2026 season

Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season

TOSS

Bangladesh has won the toss and has opted to bowl first.

Playing XIs

Bangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon, Towhid Hridoy(c), Yasir Ali, Nurul Hasan(w), Mahedi Hasan, Mohammad Saifuddin, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Nahid Rana

Zimbabwe: Brian Bennett, Tadiwanashe Marumani, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Milton Shumba, Clive Madande(w), Tashinga Musekiwa, Brad Evans, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani

SQUADS

Bangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon(w), Towhid Hridoy(c), Nurul Hasan, Mosaddek Hossain, Mahedi Hasan, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Shoriful Islam, Nahid Rana, Yasir Ali, Mohammad Saifuddin, Rishad Hossain, Abdul Gaffar Saqlain

Zimbabwe: Tadiwanashe Marumani(w), Brian Bennett, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Clive Madande, Brad Evans, Wellington Masakadza, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani, Newman Nyamhuri, Ben Curran, Milton Shumba, Tashinga Musekiwa, Tinotenda Maposa

Published on Jul 15, 2026

#BAN #ZIM #live #score #1st #T20I #Ngarava #removes #openers #Bangladesh">BAN vs ZIM live score, 1st T20I: Ngarava removes openers; Bangladesh 30/2 (4)  TOSSBangladesh has won the toss and has opted to bowl first.Playing XIsBangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon, Towhid Hridoy(c), Yasir Ali, Nurul Hasan(w), Mahedi Hasan, Mohammad Saifuddin, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Nahid RanaZimbabwe: Brian Bennett, Tadiwanashe Marumani, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Milton Shumba, Clive Madande(w), Tashinga Musekiwa, Brad Evans, Richard Ngarava, Blessing MuzarabaniSQUADSBangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon(w), Towhid Hridoy(c), Nurul Hasan, Mosaddek Hossain, Mahedi Hasan, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Shoriful Islam, Nahid Rana, Yasir Ali, Mohammad Saifuddin, Rishad Hossain, Abdul Gaffar SaqlainZimbabwe: Tadiwanashe Marumani(w), Brian Bennett, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Clive Madande, Brad Evans, Wellington Masakadza, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani, Newman Nyamhuri, Ben Curran, Milton Shumba, Tashinga Musekiwa, Tinotenda MaposaPublished on Jul 15, 2026  #BAN #ZIM #live #score #1st #T20I #Ngarava #removes #openers #Bangladesh

Post Comment