×
EXCLUSIVE: LVMH Launches First Human Rights Charter

EXCLUSIVE: LVMH Launches First Human Rights Charter

PARIS — French luxury group LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton has launched its first Human Rights Charter, underscoring the importance of protecting brand reputation as consumers place growing emphasis on good corporate citizenship, WWD has learned.

The document published on Wednesday guarantees the enforcement of universal principles, freedoms and fundamental rights as laid out in international conventions, including the International Bill of Human Rights.

It also engages the responsibility of the group’s suppliers and other business partners — a key point given the supply chain scandals that have plagued the luxury sector over the last two years.

“Respect for human rights is both an ethical imperative and a condition for the sustainability of the group’s operations,” LVMH said in the document seen by WWD.

The group has named Julie Vallat vice president, human rights, reporting to Olivier Théophile, group senior vice president, social engagement. Vallat, who joined at the end of April, is charged with steering the implementation of the roadmap across LVMH and its 75-odd brands, which include Dior, Louis Vuitton, Tiffany & Co. and Sephora.

The executive joins the group from beauty giant L’Oréal, where she was vice president, human rights, since 2019. Prior to that, Vallat was head of human rights at energy major Total.

She will be backed by a Human Rights Council made up of experts from the public, private and nonprofit sectors whose role is to provide independent advice and help identify emerging issues.

The Human Rights Charter, which applies in all countries where LVMH operates, sets out detailed guidelines covering areas including labor conditions, discrimination and harassment, cultural appropriation, environmental protections and armed conflicts, among others.

LVMH namely reinforces its pledge to protect personal data amid a rise in cybersecurity attacks targeting a slew of high-profile brands and retailers, from M&S, Co-op, Adidas and The North Face to Harrods, Louis Vuitton, Chanel and Dior. It also promises not to contribute to armed conflicts or serious human rights violations in conflict-affected areas.

“The group seeks to identify and prevent situations in which its activities, business relationships or supply chains could support, finance or benefit from such situations and, where applicable, to withdraw responsibly from a conflict zone,” it said, noting this applied particularly to the sourcing of materials or resources from affected areas.

At a time of declining spending on personal luxury goods, reputational risk has become a key battleground for brands committed to ensuring the highest standards of quality.

In Italy, prosecutors have tackled the endemic issue of undocumented workers, pursuing several brands for failing to properly audit their manufacturers, some of whom subcontracted production to sweatshops.

In response, companies have begun strengthening their internal controls and compliance measures. Loro Piana has reaffirmed its commitment to improving its supply chain auditing, severing ties with suppliers found in violation of its agreements, as did Valentino and Giorgio Armani.

Meanwhile, Dior vowed to take a larger proportion of its production in-house and in 2024 created a new industrial department tasked with strengthening its overall production capacity over the long term and ensuring the continuity of its know-how.

LVMH said it required all its business partners to comply with the new charter, in addition to its Supplier and Business Partner Code of Conduct.

“Given the complexity of global supply chains, the group requires its business partners to put in place appropriate mechanisms, including preventive measures, traceability, monitoring and remediation measures. They are also responsible for ensuring that their own partners and subcontractors comply with these principles,” it said.

It has also put in place an internal reporting platform, LVMH Alert Line, with an accompanying whisteblower policy that requires a confidential and independent investigation “within a reasonable period of time, and in a proportionate manner.”

The group recently formed a Vigilance Committee tasked with overseeing the charter. It includes four members of the executive committee, among them Antoine Arnault, group director of image and environment. 

Criteria related to CSR and sustainability are factored into the performance-related pay of senior LVMH executives, including chairman and chief executive officer Bernard Arnault. 

Source link
#EXCLUSIVE #LVMH #Launches #Human #Rights #Charter

Previous post

Why More Couples Are Choosing Moissanite Engagement Rings Today

Next post

How Smart Devices Are Actually Built: An Engineer’s View<div> <p>Pick up any smart device you own. A doorbell that recognizes faces, a watch that reads your heart rhythm, a thermostat that learns when you leave for work. They feel simple. You tap, they respond.</p> <p>That simplicity is a lie. A useful one, but a lie.</p> <p>Behind the clean app and the satisfying click is a stack of engineering decisions that most people never see. And the gap between a device that works for five years and one that dies in eight months almost always traces back to those invisible choices. So let’s look at what actually goes into building the connected gadgets shipping in 2026.</p> <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-smart-starts-with-the-circuit-board-not-the-cloud"><strong>Smart starts with the circuit board, not the cloud</strong></h2> <p>Most coverage of smart devices jumps straight to AI features and voice assistants. But the foundation is physical. A device is a printed circuit board, a microcontroller, a fistful of sensors, a radio, and a battery, all crammed into a shell that has to survive being dropped, sat on, and left in a hot car.</p> <p>This is where<a href="https://yalantis.com/services/hardware-development/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> hardware development</a> does its quiet, unglamorous work. Engineers pick a microcontroller based on how much computing the device needs versus how little power it can afford to burn. They route signal traces on the board so a Wi-Fi radio doesn’t drown out a delicate sensor reading. They run the whole thing through thermal testing, drop testing, and certification for FCC and CE marks before it can legally ship.</p> <p>Get this layer wrong, and no amount of clever software saves you. A poorly designed board produces flaky sensor data. Bad antenna placement means the device drops off your network the moment you walk to the next room. These aren’t software bugs. You can’t patch your way out of a physics problem.</p> <p>The companies building good hardware treat the proof-of-concept stage as a real checkpoint. They wire up development boards and modular parts to test the core idea cheaply, before committing to a custom design that costs real money to manufacture. It’s the boring discipline that separates products from expensive paperweights.</p> <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-firmware-is-where-the-device-actually-thinks"><strong>Firmware is where the device actually thinks</strong></h2> <p>Sitting on top of the hardware is firmware. This is the low-level code that tells the chip what to do, when to wake up, how to read a sensor, and when to phone home. People mix up firmware and software all the time, so here’s the clean split. Software runs on your phone or in the cloud and handles the screens you tap. Firmware lives inside the device and controls the hardware directly.</p> <p>Firmware is genuinely hard to write well. The constraints are brutal. A typical IoT microcontroller has a tiny amount of memory, often measured in kilobytes, and it might run on a coin cell that needs to last a year. Every line of code competes for space and power.</p> <p>Then there’s timing. A lot of devices need deterministic, real-time behavior, meaning a sensor reading has to be processed within a fixed window or the whole thing falls apart. A heart monitor that processes a beat “eventually” is useless. The firmware has to guarantee it happens now.</p> <p>If you want the deep version of how this gets built in practice, Yalantis published a solid breakdown of<a href="https://yalantis.com/blog/firmware-development-for-embedded-iot-devices/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> firmware development for embedded IoT devices</a> that covers architecture, power management, and the over-the-air update workflows that keep a device current after it ships. The OTA piece matters more than it sounds. A device that can’t safely update its own firmware is frozen in time the day it leaves the factory.</p> <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-connectivity-is-a-series-of-trade-offs"><strong>Connectivity is a series of trade-offs</strong></h2> <p>Your smart device has to talk to something. Your phone, your router, a cloud server, or all three. Choosing how it talks is one of the most consequential engineering calls in the whole project, and there’s no single right answer.</p> <p>Bluetooth Low Energy sips power and works great for a wearable talking to your phone, but its range is short and it can’t reach the internet on its own. Wi-Fi reaches everything but drains batteries fast. LoRaWAN travels for miles on almost no power, which is perfect for a soil sensor in a field, but it carries tiny amounts of data slowly. Cellular options like NB-IoT and LTE-M let a device work anywhere there’s a signal, with the catch of ongoing data costs and bigger power draw.</p> <p>Engineers usually mix these. A fitness band might use BLE to sync with your phone, and your phone carries the data the rest of the way. An industrial sensor in a remote location might use LoRaWAN to a gateway, which then forwards everything over cellular. The “right” combination depends entirely on power budget, data volume, range, and cost, which is exactly why this decision gets made early and gets revisited often.</p> <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-sensors-and-the-messy-job-of-trusting-them"><strong>Sensors and the messy job of trusting them</strong></h2> <p>A smart device is only as good as the data it collects. And raw sensor data is messy.</p> <p>Take a simple temperature reading. The sensor drifts over time. It gets warmed by the heat of the chip sitting next to it. It returns noisy values that jitter up and down even when nothing changes. Firmware has to calibrate, filter, and sanity-check all of it before the device acts on a single number.</p> <p>This gets serious fast in regulated fields. A continuous glucose monitor or a medical wearable can’t ship a reading that’s “close enough.” The sensor design, the calibration, and the firmware that validates the data all have to meet standards that consumer gadgets never face. The engineering bar is much higher, and the cost of getting it wrong is measured in patient safety, not customer reviews.</p> <p>For everyday devices the stakes are lower, but the principle holds. Good devices spend a lot of hidden effort turning unreliable physical signals into numbers you can actually trust.</p> <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-where-the-ai-hype-meets-the-silicon"><strong>Where the AI hype meets the silicon</strong></h2> <p>Here’s the part that has changed most recently. A growing share of smart devices now run machine learning models directly on the chip instead of sending everything to the cloud. This is edge computing, and it’s reshaping how devices get built.</p> <p>The appeal is obvious. Processing data on the device means lower latency, since you’re not waiting on a round trip to a server. It means better privacy, because your data never leaves your hand. And it means the device keeps working when your internet goes down.</p> <p>The catch is that running a model on a chip with kilobytes of memory is an engineering puzzle. Models have to be shrunk, quantized, and optimized until they fit in the space available without melting the battery. The face-recognition that runs locally on a modern doorbell is a heavily compressed version of what would run on a server. Squeezing it down to fit is real, specialized work, and it’s increasingly where the competitive difference between two similar gadgets actually lives.</p> <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-security-can-t-be-the-last-step"><strong>Security can’t be the last step</strong></h2> <p>For years, connected devices treated security as an afterthought. Ship the product, patch problems later. That approach has aged badly.</p> <p>Outdated firmware is now one of the most common ways attackers break into IoT systems. Research from the security firm ONEKEY found that vulnerable firmware accounts for a large majority of successful attacks on connected devices. Once an attacker is inside one poorly secured gadget on your network, they have a foothold to reach everything else.</p> <p>Building security in from the start means encrypting data both when it’s stored on the device and when it travels to the cloud. It means signing firmware updates so a device only accepts legitimate code, not something an attacker swapped in. And it means designing for recovery, so a compromised device can be safely reset and restored rather than turned into a permanent liability sitting on your shelf.</p> <p>This is the layer consumers never think about and pay the most for when it’s done badly.</p> <h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-why-the-next-generation-is-harder-to-build"><strong>Why the next generation is harder to build</strong></h2> <p>Smart devices are getting more capable, and that capability has a cost that lands squarely on the engineering team. More on-device intelligence. Stricter privacy rules. Longer battery expectations. Tighter security. Regulatory scrutiny that used to apply only to medical gear now creeping toward consumer products too.</p> <p>None of this shows up in the marketing. The ad shows a person tapping a screen and a light turning on. What it doesn’t show is the year of board revisions, firmware rewrites, connectivity tests, and security audits that made that tap reliable.</p> <p>So the next time a smart device just works, give a small nod to the invisible stack underneath. The clean experience on the surface is the product of a lot of unglamorous engineering refusing to cut corners. That refusal is the whole difference between a gadget you trust and one you return.</p> </div>#Smart #Devices #Built #Engineers #Viewengineering,smart devices

Post Comment