If you need a new phone and don’t care that much about whether it runs iOS or Android, there are a couple of solid options for you right now.
Specifically, those would be the iPhone 17 and Google Pixel 10. The former was just revealed at a big announcement event, while the latter is already on store shelves. There’s plenty to like about both of these phones, so instead of wasting any more time, let’s jump right in.
SEE ALSO:
The new Apple products are available for preorder on Amazon
iPhone 17 vs. Pixel 10: Price
Both the iPhone 17 and Pixel 10 start at $799. While it might not seem like it, that actually gives Apple the edge on price.
That’s because the base version of the iPhone 17 comes with 256GB of storage (which is still on the light side), while the base Pixel 10 comes with a measly 128GB. If you opt for the Pixel 10 with 256GB of storage, you’ll have to pay $899.
So, point Apple.
iPhone 17 vs. Pixel 10: Specs
The Pixel 10 and its signature camera bump.
Credit: Joe Maldonado/Mashable
Here are the iPhone 17’s basic specs:
-
6.3-inch display with 2622×1206 resolution and adaptive 120Hz refresh rate
-
A19 chip
-
256GB/512GB storage
-
Rear cameras: 48MP wide, 48MP ultrawide
-
Front camera: 18MP
And here are the Pixel 10’s specs:
-
6.3-inch display with 2424×1080 resolution and adaptive 120Hz refresh rate
-
Google Tensor G5 chip
-
128GB/256GB storage
-
Rear cameras: 48MP wide, 13MP ultrawide, 10.8MP telephoto
-
Front camera: 10.5MP
Okay, so what do all those numbers and abbreviations mean? There are actually major differences worth noting. Not only does Apple’s handset have higher base storage of 256GB, but it also goes up to 512GB. The Pixel 10 starts at 128GB and maxes out at 256GB. For two phones that cost the same amount of money, that’s a pretty big disparity.
Aside from that, Apple caught up with the Joneses this year by embracing a 120Hz refresh rate in the base iPhone 17’s display. In previous years, you needed to shell out for an iPhone Pro model to get that, while Google included it in the base Pixel phone. That’s not a disparity anymore, which is good for Apple.
Mashable Light Speed
The two phones also have different in-house chipsets and fairly different camera arrays, which we’ll get to in a little bit.
iPhone 17 vs. Pixel 10: Design
Left:
Credit: CNET
Right:
Credit: Joe Maldonado/Mashable
There really isn’t a lot to say in this category. Both the iPhone 17 and Pixel 10 look a lot like their 2024 predecessors. While the internet is extremely divided on the iPhone 17 Pro and its “cosmic orange” color, the iPhone 17 just looks like a regular ol’ iPhone. It carries forward the vertically stacked dual-camera bump on the phone’s backside, while the Pixel 10 maintains the Cyclops-looking horizontal camera bar that the Pixel 9 had.
You do get different color options with both phones, at least. The iPhone 17 comes in five hues: Lavender, Mist Blue, Black, White, and Sage. As for Pixel 10, here are your choices: Indigo, Frost, Lemongrass, and Obsidian. I’m a big proponent of the Pixel 10’s indigo color, but this ultimately is a matter of personal taste for everyone.
iPhone 17 vs. Pixel 10: Performance and battery
The new iPhone 17.
Credit: CNET
Both the Pixel 10 and iPhone 17 use custom, in-house chipsets rather than third-party chips. For Apple, it’s the new A19 chip, while Google’s handset uses the Tensor G5 chip.
Since the iPhone 17 isn’t actually out yet, we can’t directly compare the Tensor 5 to the A19, though Apple usually has the edge when it comes to processors. I can say that the Pixel 10’s performance is totally fine, and if recent history is any indication, the same will be true of the iPhone 17. Processor performance is rarely an issue with Apple devices, and there’s no reason to believe it will start being one this year.
As for battery life, both phones are rated for about 30 hours on a single charge. The Pixel 10 almost got there in my testing, but we haven’t tested the iPhone 17 yet. It remains to be seen if there is a significant difference between these two phones when it comes to battery endurance.
iPhone 17 vs. Pixel 10: Cameras
1x zoom on Pixel 10.
Credit: Alex Perry/Mashable
5x zoom on Pixel 10.
Credit: Alex Perry/Mashable
Lastly, Google has one big advantage over Apple when it comes to cameras: A third telephoto lens.
Apple has never included this on any of its base iPhone models, instead making it a Pro feature. Google never had, either, until this year. The Pixel 10’s telephoto lens has up to 5x optical zoom, which produced pretty sharp results in my testing. You only get up to 2x optical zoom on iPhone 17, so that puts Apple at a sizable disadvantage.
That’s not to say Apple doesn’t have some numerical wins over Google this year, though. The main shooter on each phone is 48MP, but the iPhone 17’s ultrawide lens is 48MP, while the Pixel 10’s is just 13MP. Apple also has a cool new 18MP Center Stage selfie camera (versus 10.5MP on Pixel 10), and it sports a wider field of view so you can fit more people into selfies. We’ll have to wait until we can properly test this out to see if it really beats Google at the selfie game, but for now, it seems like it will.
So, if you take more selfies, iPhone has the advantage for now. If you like to zoom in, the Pixel has the edge.
Should you buy the iPhone 17 or Pixel 10?
Apple fans disappointed by this year’s iPhone launch event may be tempted to explore Pixel and Samsung Galaxy phones for the first time. But the vast majority of people have a clear preference when it comes to the iOS or Android question. We’ll reserve judgment on this question until we’ve tested the iPhone 17. If you need more help in the meantime, check out our full Pixel 10 review.
Products featured in this guide:
Source link
#iPhone #Pixel #phone #display #price #specs
![Exclusive: Redwood Materials lays off 10% in restructuring to chase energy storage business | TechCrunch
Redwood Materials has laid off around 135 employees, or roughly 10% of its workforce, as it restructures to better accommodate its growing energy storage business, TechCrunch has learned.
The cuts come just five months after Redwood cut 5% of its workforce, and three months after it closed a 5 million funding round that boosted the battery recycling company’s valuation to north of billion, as TechCrunch previously reported.
It’s been a difficult time in the battery industry lately. Earlier this month, battery recycler Ascend Elements filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing “insurmountable” financial challenges. Some battery-makers have also restructured or gone out of business as the automotive industry in the U.S. has backed away from its most optimistic and ambitious plans to transition to electric vehicles.
But Redwood Materials founder and CEO JB Straubel told employees that this new round of cuts is not a sign that the company is heading down the same path.
“Redwood today is the strongest it’s ever been,” Straubel wrote in an email to the workers who weren’t laid off, according to a copy viewed by TechCrunch. “The materials business is well on its way to profitability and has an exciting roadmap ahead.”
Straubel noted that Redwood “continue[s] to dominate the US battery recycling market” but also touted the company’s “great momentum” in its new energy storage business. Redwood has recently announced deals with Crusoe AI and, most recently, electric automaker Rivian to provide recycled batteries that can be used to power those companies’ facilities. The company declined to comment beyond the contents of Straubel’s email.
In his message, Straubel wrote that “parts of the company have expanded faster than needed to support the direction” of Redwood. As a result, he said Redwood is making cuts across multiple divisions, including the engineering and operations organizations, according to an employee who was granted anonymity to discuss the layoffs.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
“We are confident that we can deliver on our critical projects with a smaller team that is more focused,” he wrote. “We have successfully adapted to changes in the market that have bankrupted many of our competitors.”
Straubel went on to write that he is “more excited than ever with our path ahead as we build the most integrated and cost-effective critical materials and energy storage business in the world.”
“This is a self-sustaining business and will continue to make this company more valuable over time. We have the team and the technology to do what no other company can,” he wrote.
Workers who were laid off were told by Redwood’s chief HR officer that the layoffs were made “to sharpen our focus, our work and the size of our teams to support the direction Redwood is going in the future,” according to a copy of her email, which was viewed by TechCrunch.
Employees who were laid off are receiving severance and paid health benefits, according to Straubel’s email, as well as “career transition assistance.”
“I am grateful to the approximately 135 employees who we say goodbye to today — they’ve all contributed to building Redwood,” he wrote.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Exclusive #Redwood #Materials #lays #restructuring #chase #energy #storage #business #TechCrunchBatteries,battery recycling,electric vehicles,EVs,Exclusive,Redwood Materials](https://i1.wp.com/techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/53200897797_87d290a75e_o.jpg?resize=1200%2C800&ssl=1 "Exclusive: Redwood Materials lays off 10% in restructuring to chase energy storage business | TechCrunch
Redwood Materials has laid off around 135 employees, or roughly 10% of its workforce, as it restructures to better accommodate its growing energy storage business, TechCrunch has learned.
The cuts come just five months after Redwood cut 5% of its workforce, and three months after it closed a 5 million funding round that boosted the battery recycling company’s valuation to north of billion, as TechCrunch previously reported.
It’s been a difficult time in the battery industry lately. Earlier this month, battery recycler Ascend Elements filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing “insurmountable” financial challenges. Some battery-makers have also restructured or gone out of business as the automotive industry in the U.S. has backed away from its most optimistic and ambitious plans to transition to electric vehicles.
But Redwood Materials founder and CEO JB Straubel told employees that this new round of cuts is not a sign that the company is heading down the same path.
“Redwood today is the strongest it’s ever been,” Straubel wrote in an email to the workers who weren’t laid off, according to a copy viewed by TechCrunch. “The materials business is well on its way to profitability and has an exciting roadmap ahead.”
Straubel noted that Redwood “continue[s] to dominate the US battery recycling market” but also touted the company’s “great momentum” in its new energy storage business. Redwood has recently announced deals with Crusoe AI and, most recently, electric automaker Rivian to provide recycled batteries that can be used to power those companies’ facilities. The company declined to comment beyond the contents of Straubel’s email.
In his message, Straubel wrote that “parts of the company have expanded faster than needed to support the direction” of Redwood. As a result, he said Redwood is making cuts across multiple divisions, including the engineering and operations organizations, according to an employee who was granted anonymity to discuss the layoffs.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
“We are confident that we can deliver on our critical projects with a smaller team that is more focused,” he wrote. “We have successfully adapted to changes in the market that have bankrupted many of our competitors.”
Straubel went on to write that he is “more excited than ever with our path ahead as we build the most integrated and cost-effective critical materials and energy storage business in the world.”
“This is a self-sustaining business and will continue to make this company more valuable over time. We have the team and the technology to do what no other company can,” he wrote.
Workers who were laid off were told by Redwood’s chief HR officer that the layoffs were made “to sharpen our focus, our work and the size of our teams to support the direction Redwood is going in the future,” according to a copy of her email, which was viewed by TechCrunch.
Employees who were laid off are receiving severance and paid health benefits, according to Straubel’s email, as well as “career transition assistance.”
“I am grateful to the approximately 135 employees who we say goodbye to today — they’ve all contributed to building Redwood,” he wrote.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Exclusive #Redwood #Materials #lays #restructuring #chase #energy #storage #business #TechCrunchBatteries,battery recycling,electric vehicles,EVs,Exclusive,Redwood Materials")
Post Comment