×
Nightly Smartphone Use at Bedtime Isn’t as Bad as You Think, Study Suggests

Nightly Smartphone Use at Bedtime Isn’t as Bad as You Think, Study Suggests

Everyone has heard the advice to not use your smartphone before going to sleep—and many of us have ignored it. In fact, you might be reading this very article while in bed. If that’s the case, it might come in handy next time someone nags you about your sleep hygiene.

That’s because a study published this summer in the journal Sleep Health suggests that adults’ nightly bedtime screen use might not be as detrimental to sleep as previously believed. While further research is needed to confirm these unexpected results, the study highlights the enduring uncertainty about the consequences of our smartphone addictions.

Bedtime screen use

The researchers investigated the self-reported bedtime screen use (using screens in bed or within an hour of bedtime) and sleep health of over 1,000 adults in Canada. More than 80% reported being on screens during bedtime in the past month, and almost half reported bedtime screen use every night. Researchers classified the participants into three types of bedtime screen users: occasional (less than once a week), moderate (one to four times a week), and regular (5 or more times a week).

Notably, “after accounting for biological sex, age, and income, both occasional and regular screen users reported the best overall sleep health,” the team wrote in the study. Occasional bedtime screen users had the highest sleep regularity and sleep satisfaction, and regular bedtime screen users had the best sleep timing and daytime alertness. Moderate users reported the worst sleep health.

It’s worth noting that participants’ self-reported claims about sleep health might not be as accurate as researchers physically tracking their sleep in a lab. Nonetheless, these results seem to challenge findings from previous studies. For example, in a 2021 paper, researchers write that “screen exposure, especially near bedtime, directly leads to poor sleep quality.” A 2023 paper on medical students in Egypt reported a remarkably greater occurrence of poor sleep quality among smartphone users at bedtime. A 2022 study explains that smartphone screens emit blue light, which can impact sleep quality.

However, “the previous coverage of blue light has not factored in age, timing and intensity of the blue light exposure when making sweeping generalizations about this research,” Colleen Carney, a co-author of the study and director of the Sleep and Depression Laboratory at Toronto Metropolitan University, said in a university statement. “There may be reason to be cautious about excessive blue light exposure in the evening for teens as puberty increases light-sensitivity. As we age, we are not as light sensitive and there are age-related effects of the eye that make light less disruptive.”

Test it out for yourself

Adults’ sleep health might also be impacted by how one uses a smartphone or similar device before bed, not just when. For example, some apps can help relax users. On the other hand, others can heighten emotions that hinder sleep, according to the statement.

“The association between bedtime screen use and sleep health appears complex as bedtime screen use frequency, the sleep health dimension measured, and biological sex can all influence this relationship,” the researchers admitted in the new study. “More research is needed to understand the sleep health and bedtime screen use association and moderators of this relationship in adults.”

Adults can test out the effects of bedtime screen use on their sleep directly by monitoring their current sleep for one week and then monitoring it for a second week during which they don’t use devices at least one hour before bedtime, according to Carney.

“If you sleep and feel better with an earlier bedtime for your device, make it a new habit. If you don’t notice a difference, like the people in this study, the device is not the problem we have been led to believe,” Carney concluded, though this might seem like a simplistic conclusion to some.

Source link
#Nightly #Smartphone #Bedtime #Isnt #Bad #Study #Suggests

The Swift Observatory was launched in 2004, but recent solar storms have pushed its orbit lower, and it’s in danger of burning up in Earth’s atmosphere as soon as this year. To try and stave off its demise, NASA has enlisted Katalyst Space Technologies. The company’s Link spacecraft launched Friday with the goal of intercepting Swift, which has no propulsion system, and boosting its orbit back to its original position. Right now, Swift is circling at an altitude of 224 miles, and Link is aiming to raise that by about 150 miles.

Using a three-armed spacecraft to lift a satellite 150 miles higher into orbit is challenging enough, but the speed with which Katalyst pulled the mission together makes it even more impressive. NASA required the company to rush the job because Swift would be too low to save by October. $30 million and nine months later, help is on the way for the $500 million Swift.

#NASA #launched #emergency #mission #stop #Swift #Observatory #crashing #EarthNews,Science,Space">NASA launched an emergency mission to stop the Swift Observatory from crashing to EarthThe Swift Observatory was launched in 2004, but recent solar storms have pushed its orbit lower, and it’s in danger of burning up in Earth’s atmosphere as soon as this year. To try and stave off its demise, NASA has enlisted Katalyst Space Technologies. The company’s Link spacecraft launched Friday with the goal of intercepting Swift, which has no propulsion system, and boosting its orbit back to its original position. Right now, Swift is circling at an altitude of 224 miles, and Link is aiming to raise that by about 150 miles.Using a three-armed spacecraft to lift a satellite 150 miles higher into orbit is challenging enough, but the speed with which Katalyst pulled the mission together makes it even more impressive. NASA required the company to rush the job because Swift would be too low to save by October.  million and nine months later, help is on the way for the 0 million Swift.#NASA #launched #emergency #mission #stop #Swift #Observatory #crashing #EarthNews,Science,Space

stave off its demise, NASA has enlisted Katalyst Space Technologies. The company’s Link spacecraft launched Friday with the goal of intercepting Swift, which has no propulsion system, and boosting its orbit back to its original position. Right now, Swift is circling at an altitude of 224 miles, and Link is aiming to raise that by about 150 miles.

Using a three-armed spacecraft to lift a satellite 150 miles higher into orbit is challenging enough, but the speed with which Katalyst pulled the mission together makes it even more impressive. NASA required the company to rush the job because Swift would be too low to save by October. $30 million and nine months later, help is on the way for the $500 million Swift.

#NASA #launched #emergency #mission #stop #Swift #Observatory #crashing #EarthNews,Science,Space">NASA launched an emergency mission to stop the Swift Observatory from crashing to Earth

The Swift Observatory was launched in 2004, but recent solar storms have pushed its orbit lower, and it’s in danger of burning up in Earth’s atmosphere as soon as this year. To try and stave off its demise, NASA has enlisted Katalyst Space Technologies. The company’s Link spacecraft launched Friday with the goal of intercepting Swift, which has no propulsion system, and boosting its orbit back to its original position. Right now, Swift is circling at an altitude of 224 miles, and Link is aiming to raise that by about 150 miles.

Using a three-armed spacecraft to lift a satellite 150 miles higher into orbit is challenging enough, but the speed with which Katalyst pulled the mission together makes it even more impressive. NASA required the company to rush the job because Swift would be too low to save by October. $30 million and nine months later, help is on the way for the $500 million Swift.

#NASA #launched #emergency #mission #stop #Swift #Observatory #crashing #EarthNews,Science,Space
Two hundred and fifty years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, a new commercial from Google asks: What if the Founding Fathers had access to Google Workspace?

With the tagline “Group project, but make it 1776,” the ad depicts a largely unseen Thomas Jefferson mid-draft when he gets a nagging text from Ben Franklin, leading to a very Google-centric collaboration process. Edits are suggested in Google Docs, a meeting gets scheduled in Google Calendar and conducted remotely via Google Meet (with every single attendee apparently turning their camera off?), then the whole thing is finalized with e-signatures; cue the fireworks.

Of course, since this is an ad from a tech company in the year 2026, AI has a role to play. The fictionalized founders use Google’s “help me visualize” AI tool to try out different animals on the national seal, Gemini takes notes on the meeting, and the founders also ask the chatbot for advice before declining King George III’s document access request.

The whole thing is very tongue-in-cheek (at one point, Sam Adams asks, “Can we settle this over beers?”), and the AI evangelism is relatively discreet when compared to many other recent ads. And unlike that infamous Google commercial in which a father uses Gemini to write a fan letter for his daughter, this one shies away from any suggestion that the actual text of the Declaration of Independence would be improved with AI. Perhaps the most AI-forward element of the ad is the footage itself, which to my eye has the uncanny glow of AI-generated video.

While viewer comments on YouTube and Instagram appear to be mostly positive, you may not be surprised to learn that the response on Bluesky has been far more critical. Posters declared the commercial “cringey” and “stunningly tone deaf,” and the AI angle was the biggest target — even as many users, including historian Angus Johnston, noted that it’s “amazing how little of this is actually AI.”

“Even in a corny fantasy joke, it’s impossible to make the case that AI is a useful tool for political organizing, writing, or human collaboration,” Johnston said.

[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3RjZY-rSsc[/embed]

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Google #commercial #imagines #Declaration #Independence #written #TechCrunchgemini,Google">New Google commercial imagines a Declaration of Independence written with help from AI | TechCrunch
Two hundred and fifty years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, a new commercial from Google asks: What if the Founding Fathers had access to Google Workspace?

With the tagline “Group project, but make it 1776,” the ad depicts a largely unseen Thomas Jefferson mid-draft when he gets a nagging text from Ben Franklin, leading to a very Google-centric collaboration process. Edits are suggested in Google Docs, a meeting gets scheduled in Google Calendar and conducted remotely via Google Meet (with every single attendee apparently turning their camera off?), then the whole thing is finalized with e-signatures; cue the fireworks.







Of course, since this is an ad from a tech company in the year 2026, AI has a role to play. The fictionalized founders use Google’s “help me visualize” AI tool to try out different animals on the national seal, Gemini takes notes on the meeting, and the founders also ask the chatbot for advice before declining King George III’s document access request.

The whole thing is very tongue-in-cheek (at one point, Sam Adams asks, “Can we settle this over beers?”), and the AI evangelism is relatively discreet when compared to many other recent ads. And unlike that infamous Google commercial in which a father uses Gemini to write a fan letter for his daughter, this one shies away from any suggestion that the actual text of the Declaration of Independence would be improved with AI. Perhaps the most AI-forward element of the ad is the footage itself, which to my eye has the uncanny glow of AI-generated video.

While viewer comments on YouTube and Instagram appear to be mostly positive, you may not be surprised to learn that the response on Bluesky has been far more critical. Posters declared the commercial “cringey” and “stunningly tone deaf,” and the AI angle was the biggest target — even as many users, including historian Angus Johnston, noted that it’s “amazing how little of this is actually AI.”

“Even in a corny fantasy joke, it’s impossible to make the case that AI is a useful tool for political organizing, writing, or human collaboration,” Johnston said.


[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3RjZY-rSsc[/embed]

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Google #commercial #imagines #Declaration #Independence #written #TechCrunchgemini,Google

a new commercial from Google asks: What if the Founding Fathers had access to Google Workspace?

With the tagline “Group project, but make it 1776,” the ad depicts a largely unseen Thomas Jefferson mid-draft when he gets a nagging text from Ben Franklin, leading to a very Google-centric collaboration process. Edits are suggested in Google Docs, a meeting gets scheduled in Google Calendar and conducted remotely via Google Meet (with every single attendee apparently turning their camera off?), then the whole thing is finalized with e-signatures; cue the fireworks.

Of course, since this is an ad from a tech company in the year 2026, AI has a role to play. The fictionalized founders use Google’s “help me visualize” AI tool to try out different animals on the national seal, Gemini takes notes on the meeting, and the founders also ask the chatbot for advice before declining King George III’s document access request.

The whole thing is very tongue-in-cheek (at one point, Sam Adams asks, “Can we settle this over beers?”), and the AI evangelism is relatively discreet when compared to many other recent ads. And unlike that infamous Google commercial in which a father uses Gemini to write a fan letter for his daughter, this one shies away from any suggestion that the actual text of the Declaration of Independence would be improved with AI. Perhaps the most AI-forward element of the ad is the footage itself, which to my eye has the uncanny glow of AI-generated video.

While viewer comments on YouTube and Instagram appear to be mostly positive, you may not be surprised to learn that the response on Bluesky has been far more critical. Posters declared the commercial “cringey” and “stunningly tone deaf,” and the AI angle was the biggest target — even as many users, including historian Angus Johnston, noted that it’s “amazing how little of this is actually AI.”

“Even in a corny fantasy joke, it’s impossible to make the case that AI is a useful tool for political organizing, writing, or human collaboration,” Johnston said.

[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3RjZY-rSsc[/embed]

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Google #commercial #imagines #Declaration #Independence #written #TechCrunchgemini,Google">New Google commercial imagines a Declaration of Independence written with help from AI | TechCrunch

Two hundred and fifty years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, a new commercial from Google asks: What if the Founding Fathers had access to Google Workspace?

With the tagline “Group project, but make it 1776,” the ad depicts a largely unseen Thomas Jefferson mid-draft when he gets a nagging text from Ben Franklin, leading to a very Google-centric collaboration process. Edits are suggested in Google Docs, a meeting gets scheduled in Google Calendar and conducted remotely via Google Meet (with every single attendee apparently turning their camera off?), then the whole thing is finalized with e-signatures; cue the fireworks.

Of course, since this is an ad from a tech company in the year 2026, AI has a role to play. The fictionalized founders use Google’s “help me visualize” AI tool to try out different animals on the national seal, Gemini takes notes on the meeting, and the founders also ask the chatbot for advice before declining King George III’s document access request.

The whole thing is very tongue-in-cheek (at one point, Sam Adams asks, “Can we settle this over beers?”), and the AI evangelism is relatively discreet when compared to many other recent ads. And unlike that infamous Google commercial in which a father uses Gemini to write a fan letter for his daughter, this one shies away from any suggestion that the actual text of the Declaration of Independence would be improved with AI. Perhaps the most AI-forward element of the ad is the footage itself, which to my eye has the uncanny glow of AI-generated video.

While viewer comments on YouTube and Instagram appear to be mostly positive, you may not be surprised to learn that the response on Bluesky has been far more critical. Posters declared the commercial “cringey” and “stunningly tone deaf,” and the AI angle was the biggest target — even as many users, including historian Angus Johnston, noted that it’s “amazing how little of this is actually AI.”

“Even in a corny fantasy joke, it’s impossible to make the case that AI is a useful tool for political organizing, writing, or human collaboration,” Johnston said.

[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3RjZY-rSsc[/embed]

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Google #commercial #imagines #Declaration #Independence #written #TechCrunchgemini,Google

Post Comment