×
Russian, Belarusian swimmers to be allowed to compete with flag, anthem after restrictions dropped by World Aquatics  The governing body for international swimming and aquatic sports will allow athletes from Russia to compete without restrictions and with their national flag and anthem.World Aquatics said on Monday it will remove restrictions which had required Russian and Belarusian athletes to be vetted and to compete under neutral status.“Senior athletes with Belarusian or Russian sport nationality will be permitted to compete in World Aquatics events in the same way as their counterparts representing other sport nationalities, with their respective uniforms, flags and anthems,” World Aquatics said in a statement. It had previously relaxed the rules for junior athletes.World Aquatics President Husain Al Musallam added, “We are determined to ensure that pools and open water remain places where athletes from all nations can come together in peaceful competition.”ALSO READ | TOPS set for overhaul as Sports Minister seeks more focus on high-yielding disciplinesWorld Aquatics oversees sports like swimming, diving and water polo and is an influential voice in the Olympic movement.Its decision applies only to its own events, like the world championships, but could add momentum within the Olympic world for a full return of Russian athletes ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Games.There was no immediate response to a request for comment from the International Olympic Committee.In December, the IOC recommended removing restrictions on Russian and Belarusian athletes for international youth events and letting them compete under national flags.The IOC still kept its neutral requirements for senior competitions and Russians, and Belarusians were officially referred to as “Individual Neutral Athletes” at the Winter Olympics in February.Published on Apr 13, 2026  #Russian #Belarusian #swimmers #allowed #compete #flag #anthem #restrictions #dropped #World #Aquatics

Russian, Belarusian swimmers to be allowed to compete with flag, anthem after restrictions dropped by World Aquatics

The governing body for international swimming and aquatic sports will allow athletes from Russia to compete without restrictions and with their national flag and anthem.

World Aquatics said on Monday it will remove restrictions which had required Russian and Belarusian athletes to be vetted and to compete under neutral status.

“Senior athletes with Belarusian or Russian sport nationality will be permitted to compete in World Aquatics events in the same way as their counterparts representing other sport nationalities, with their respective uniforms, flags and anthems,” World Aquatics said in a statement. It had previously relaxed the rules for junior athletes.

World Aquatics President Husain Al Musallam added, “We are determined to ensure that pools and open water remain places where athletes from all nations can come together in peaceful competition.”

ALSO READ | TOPS set for overhaul as Sports Minister seeks more focus on high-yielding disciplines

World Aquatics oversees sports like swimming, diving and water polo and is an influential voice in the Olympic movement.

Its decision applies only to its own events, like the world championships, but could add momentum within the Olympic world for a full return of Russian athletes ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Games.

There was no immediate response to a request for comment from the International Olympic Committee.

In December, the IOC recommended removing restrictions on Russian and Belarusian athletes for international youth events and letting them compete under national flags.

The IOC still kept its neutral requirements for senior competitions and Russians, and Belarusians were officially referred to as “Individual Neutral Athletes” at the Winter Olympics in February.

Published on Apr 13, 2026

#Russian #Belarusian #swimmers #allowed #compete #flag #anthem #restrictions #dropped #World #Aquatics

The governing body for international swimming and aquatic sports will allow athletes from Russia to compete without restrictions and with their national flag and anthem.

World Aquatics said on Monday it will remove restrictions which had required Russian and Belarusian athletes to be vetted and to compete under neutral status.

“Senior athletes with Belarusian or Russian sport nationality will be permitted to compete in World Aquatics events in the same way as their counterparts representing other sport nationalities, with their respective uniforms, flags and anthems,” World Aquatics said in a statement. It had previously relaxed the rules for junior athletes.

World Aquatics President Husain Al Musallam added, “We are determined to ensure that pools and open water remain places where athletes from all nations can come together in peaceful competition.”

ALSO READ | TOPS set for overhaul as Sports Minister seeks more focus on high-yielding disciplines

World Aquatics oversees sports like swimming, diving and water polo and is an influential voice in the Olympic movement.

Its decision applies only to its own events, like the world championships, but could add momentum within the Olympic world for a full return of Russian athletes ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Games.

There was no immediate response to a request for comment from the International Olympic Committee.

In December, the IOC recommended removing restrictions on Russian and Belarusian athletes for international youth events and letting them compete under national flags.

The IOC still kept its neutral requirements for senior competitions and Russians, and Belarusians were officially referred to as “Individual Neutral Athletes” at the Winter Olympics in February.

Published on Apr 13, 2026

Source link
#Russian #Belarusian #swimmers #allowed #compete #flag #anthem #restrictions #dropped #World #Aquatics

Previous post

Deadspin | Tight bond: Maureen Magarity joins husband at Vermont <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/24035530.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/24035530.jpg" alt="Syndication: Worcester Telegram " class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Holy Cross coach Maureen Magarity cheers on her squad as the Crusaders take on American in the Patriot League Tournament.<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>Vermont is hiring former Holy Cross coach Maureen Magarity to be its new women’s basketball coach, On3 reported Monday.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>Magarity’s husband is John Becker, who has been the head coach of the Vermont men’s team since 2011.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>It is believed to be the first time in NCAA Division I history that the coaches of a program’s men’s and women’s basketball teams are married.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-4"> <p>Magarity, 45, replaces Alisa Kresge, who departed on Saturday to become the new head coach at Richmond.</p> </section> <section id="section-5"> <p>Kresge is the winningest coach in Catamounts history, compiling a 145-89 record with three NCAA Tournament berths in eight seasons.</p> </section><section id="section-6"> <p>Magarity has a career record of 218-196 at New Hampshire (2010-20) and Holy Cross (2020-24). Her last two teams at Holy Cross reached the NCAA Tournament. She was the Patriot League Coach of the Year in 2022 and the America East Coach of the Year in 2017.</p> </section><section id="section-7"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section></div> #Deadspin #Tight #bond #Maureen #Magarity #joins #husband #Vermont

Next post

WNBA Draft 2026: Pick-by-pick tracker for all 3 rounds <figure> <img alt="" data-caption="PHOENIX, ARIZONA - APRIL 05: Lauren Betts #51 of the UCLA Bruins shoots the ball against Maryam Dauda #30 of the South Carolina Gamecocks during the second quarter in the National Championship of the NCAA Women's Basketball Tournament at Mortgage Matchup Center on April 05, 2026 in Phoenix, Arizona. (Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images) | Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.sbnation.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/04/gettyimages-2269959325.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0,0,100,100" /> <figcaption> PHOENIX, ARIZONA – APRIL 05: Lauren Betts #51 of the UCLA Bruins shoots the ball against Maryam Dauda #30 of the South Carolina Gamecocks during the second quarter in the National Championship of the NCAA Women’s Basketball Tournament at Mortgage Matchup Center on April 05, 2026 in Phoenix, Arizona. (Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images) | Getty Images </figcaption> </figure> <p class="has-text-align-none">The 2026 WNBA Draft is here, and the Dallas Wings are on the clock with the No. 1 overall pick. Dallas hit the jackpot last year with Rookie of the Year Paige Bueckers, and now the team needs to find a co-star for the all-world lead guard if it’s going to eventually get into the playoff mix. <a href="https://www.sbnation.com/wnba/1110258/wnba-mock-draft-2026-every-pick-projection-lauren-betts">Check out our 2026 WNBA mock draft here for more analysis on this class</a>. </p> <p class="has-text-align-none"><a href="https://www.sbnation.com/womens-ncaa-basketball/1109680/ucla-south-carolina-ncaa-womens-basketball-2026-national-championship-game">UCLA recently won the women’s national championship</a>, and it should be represented well in this draft. Star center Lauren Betts is expected to go in the top-3 as a 6’7 big with graceful scoring moves inside. Gabriela Jaquez, Kiki Rice, and Gianna Kneepkens are also considered potential first-round picks after helping the Bruins win it all.</p> <p class="has-text-align-none">There’s something for everyone in this class. TCU’s Olivia Miles is a brilliant point guard prospect who provides elite playmaking with improved shooting ability. Betts is a dominant classic post player, while Spain’s Awa Fam is the type of mobile big teams dreams about. UConn’s Azzi Fudd is a knockdown three-point shooter, while LSU’s Flau’Jae Johnson is an athletic wing who can defend at a high level. </p> <p class="has-text-align-none">This draft is especially exciting because it marks the first selections for two new expansion teams, the Toronto Tempo and Portland Fire. Both teams already had their expansion drafts, and now Toronto will be picking at No. 6 while Portland chooses at No. 7. </p> <p class="has-text-align-none">We’re keeping track of the every pick for the 2026 WNBA Draft right here. </p> <figure class="wp-block-vox-media-table"><table><thead><tr><th>Pick</th><th>Team</th><th>Player</th><th>Position</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Dallas Wings</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Minnesota Lynx</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Seattle Storm</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Washington Mystics</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Chicago Sky</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Toronto Tempo</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Portland Fire</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Golden State Valkyries</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Washington Mystics</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Indiana Fever</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>Washington Mystics</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Connecticut Sun</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>Atlanta Dream</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>Seattle Storm</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>Connecticut Sun</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>Seattle Storm</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>Portland Fire</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>Connecticut Sun</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>Washington Mystics</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>Los Angeles Sparks</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>Chicago Sky</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>22</td><td>Toronto Tempo</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td>Golden State Valkyries</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td>Los Angeles Sparks</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td>Indiana Fever</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></figure> #WNBA #Draft #Pickbypick #tracker #rounds

Roughly 5,000 feet of elevation separate Denver and New York City.

Still, gravity works the same regardless of where one stands. Just ask the NBA teams in both towns.

“You get too high, and you get, I don’t want to say cocky, but feeling yourself,” Nuggets guard Tim Hardaway Jr. said.

That sensation went south on either side of the country Monday night.

After squandering sizable leads that would have cemented commanding 2-0 advantages in their respective first-round playoff series, the Nuggets and Knicks now find themselves bracing for a fight.

Should their opponents ultimately have their number, Denver and New York will look back with disdain on 19 and 14. Those were the Game 2 cushions the teams coughed up as the No. 3 seeds in the Eastern and Western Conference.

“It’s a game we should’ve won,” Knicks guard Josh Hart said. “In the playoffs, we can’t give away games.”

Be that as it may, the Knicks did just that against the Atlanta Hawks. They controlled the outcome for much of the night and took a 12-point edge into the fourth quarter after leading by as many as 14.

Then New York shot 5-for-22 from the floor in the final 12 minutes compared to 10-for-15 for Atlanta. Fighting through vulgar chants from the Madison Square Garden faithful, Hawks star CJ McCullom scored six straight points down the stretch during one key sequence on the way to a game-high 32.

“In that fourth quarter, you could tell [the Hawks] were playing with a level of desperation,” Knicks coach Mike Brown said. “There were four 50-50 balls, and they got three of the four. We always use that stat to gauge the level of aggression in a game. In that fourth quarter, their aggression stepped up.”

New York’s melted at the same time. How many late possessions saw the Knicks pass or hold the ball around the perimeter before settling for subpar looks from 3-point range? The Knicks went 3-for-11 from deep as part of their flop.

Denver led the Minnesota Timberwolves by 19 points early in the second quarter before crumbling. The Nuggets still were ahead by three points to start the fourth quarter but a combined 2-for-12 shooting effort from pillars Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray in the final 12 minutes took a toll.

“I feel like we had the game in hand, and then we just didn’t make our shots,” Murray said.

As with the Knicks and Hawks, the reversal of fortunes stemmed both from the hosts’ miscues and an outstanding effort from a visiting player, as Minnesota’s Anthony Edwards had 30 points.

“Great leadership, positive,” Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said. “He recognized he needed to get into attack mode and get downhill a little bit more. He did that.”

The Knicks and Nuggets no doubt sensed the need to amp up their own urgency as things started slipping away Monday.

That neither could act upon it didn’t signal the end for either New York or Denver, of course. But now there’s unnecessary added weight for the climb back to the top.

#Knicks #Nuggets #Blow #Big #Leads #Wrong #Game #Deadspin.com">Knicks and Nuggets Blow Big Leads: What Went Wrong in Game 2? | Deadspin.com   Roughly 5,000 feet of elevation separate Denver and New York City.Still, gravity works the same regardless of where one stands. Just ask the NBA teams in both towns.“You get too high, and you get, I don’t want to say cocky, but feeling yourself,” Nuggets guard Tim Hardaway Jr. said.That sensation went south on either side of the country Monday night.After squandering sizable leads that would have cemented commanding 2-0 advantages in their respective first-round playoff series, the Nuggets and Knicks now find themselves bracing for a fight.Should their opponents ultimately have their number, Denver and New York will look back with disdain on 19 and 14. Those were the Game 2 cushions the teams coughed up as the No. 3 seeds in the Eastern and Western Conference.“It’s a game we should’ve won,” Knicks guard Josh Hart said. “In the playoffs, we can’t give away games.”Be that as it may, the Knicks did just that against the Atlanta Hawks. They controlled the outcome for much of the night and took a 12-point edge into the fourth quarter after leading by as many as 14.Then New York shot 5-for-22 from the floor in the final 12 minutes compared to 10-for-15 for Atlanta. Fighting through vulgar chants from the Madison Square Garden faithful, Hawks star CJ McCullom scored six straight points down the stretch during one key sequence on the way to a game-high 32.“In that fourth quarter, you could tell [the Hawks] were playing with a level of desperation,” Knicks coach Mike Brown said. “There were four 50-50 balls, and they got three of the four. We always use that stat to gauge the level of aggression in a game. In that fourth quarter, their aggression stepped up.”New York’s melted at the same time. How many late possessions saw the Knicks pass or hold the ball around the perimeter before settling for subpar looks from 3-point range? The Knicks went 3-for-11 from deep as part of their flop.Denver led the Minnesota Timberwolves by 19 points early in the second quarter before crumbling. The Nuggets still were ahead by three points to start the fourth quarter but a combined 2-for-12 shooting effort from pillars Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray in the final 12 minutes took a toll.“I feel like we had the game in hand, and then we just didn’t make our shots,” Murray said.As with the Knicks and Hawks, the reversal of fortunes stemmed both from the hosts’ miscues and an outstanding effort from a visiting player, as Minnesota’s Anthony Edwards had 30 points.“Great leadership, positive,” Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said. “He recognized he needed to get into attack mode and get downhill a little bit more. He did that.”The Knicks and Nuggets no doubt sensed the need to amp up their own urgency as things started slipping away Monday.That neither could act upon it didn’t signal the end for either New York or Denver, of course. But now there’s unnecessary added weight for the climb back to the top.   #Knicks #Nuggets #Blow #Big #Leads #Wrong #Game #Deadspin.com

Knicks guard Josh Hart said. “In the playoffs, we can’t give away games.”

Be that as it may, the Knicks did just that against the Atlanta Hawks. They controlled the outcome for much of the night and took a 12-point edge into the fourth quarter after leading by as many as 14.

Then New York shot 5-for-22 from the floor in the final 12 minutes compared to 10-for-15 for Atlanta. Fighting through vulgar chants from the Madison Square Garden faithful, Hawks star CJ McCullom scored six straight points down the stretch during one key sequence on the way to a game-high 32.

“In that fourth quarter, you could tell [the Hawks] were playing with a level of desperation,” Knicks coach Mike Brown said. “There were four 50-50 balls, and they got three of the four. We always use that stat to gauge the level of aggression in a game. In that fourth quarter, their aggression stepped up.”

New York’s melted at the same time. How many late possessions saw the Knicks pass or hold the ball around the perimeter before settling for subpar looks from 3-point range? The Knicks went 3-for-11 from deep as part of their flop.

Denver led the Minnesota Timberwolves by 19 points early in the second quarter before crumbling. The Nuggets still were ahead by three points to start the fourth quarter but a combined 2-for-12 shooting effort from pillars Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray in the final 12 minutes took a toll.

“I feel like we had the game in hand, and then we just didn’t make our shots,” Murray said.

As with the Knicks and Hawks, the reversal of fortunes stemmed both from the hosts’ miscues and an outstanding effort from a visiting player, as Minnesota’s Anthony Edwards had 30 points.

“Great leadership, positive,” Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said. “He recognized he needed to get into attack mode and get downhill a little bit more. He did that.”

The Knicks and Nuggets no doubt sensed the need to amp up their own urgency as things started slipping away Monday.

That neither could act upon it didn’t signal the end for either New York or Denver, of course. But now there’s unnecessary added weight for the climb back to the top.

#Knicks #Nuggets #Blow #Big #Leads #Wrong #Game #Deadspin.com">Knicks and Nuggets Blow Big Leads: What Went Wrong in Game 2? | Deadspin.com

Roughly 5,000 feet of elevation separate Denver and New York City.

Still, gravity works the same regardless of where one stands. Just ask the NBA teams in both towns.

“You get too high, and you get, I don’t want to say cocky, but feeling yourself,” Nuggets guard Tim Hardaway Jr. said.

That sensation went south on either side of the country Monday night.

After squandering sizable leads that would have cemented commanding 2-0 advantages in their respective first-round playoff series, the Nuggets and Knicks now find themselves bracing for a fight.

Should their opponents ultimately have their number, Denver and New York will look back with disdain on 19 and 14. Those were the Game 2 cushions the teams coughed up as the No. 3 seeds in the Eastern and Western Conference.

“It’s a game we should’ve won,” Knicks guard Josh Hart said. “In the playoffs, we can’t give away games.”

Be that as it may, the Knicks did just that against the Atlanta Hawks. They controlled the outcome for much of the night and took a 12-point edge into the fourth quarter after leading by as many as 14.

Then New York shot 5-for-22 from the floor in the final 12 minutes compared to 10-for-15 for Atlanta. Fighting through vulgar chants from the Madison Square Garden faithful, Hawks star CJ McCullom scored six straight points down the stretch during one key sequence on the way to a game-high 32.

“In that fourth quarter, you could tell [the Hawks] were playing with a level of desperation,” Knicks coach Mike Brown said. “There were four 50-50 balls, and they got three of the four. We always use that stat to gauge the level of aggression in a game. In that fourth quarter, their aggression stepped up.”

New York’s melted at the same time. How many late possessions saw the Knicks pass or hold the ball around the perimeter before settling for subpar looks from 3-point range? The Knicks went 3-for-11 from deep as part of their flop.

Denver led the Minnesota Timberwolves by 19 points early in the second quarter before crumbling. The Nuggets still were ahead by three points to start the fourth quarter but a combined 2-for-12 shooting effort from pillars Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray in the final 12 minutes took a toll.

“I feel like we had the game in hand, and then we just didn’t make our shots,” Murray said.

As with the Knicks and Hawks, the reversal of fortunes stemmed both from the hosts’ miscues and an outstanding effort from a visiting player, as Minnesota’s Anthony Edwards had 30 points.

“Great leadership, positive,” Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said. “He recognized he needed to get into attack mode and get downhill a little bit more. He did that.”

The Knicks and Nuggets no doubt sensed the need to amp up their own urgency as things started slipping away Monday.

That neither could act upon it didn’t signal the end for either New York or Denver, of course. But now there’s unnecessary added weight for the climb back to the top.

#Knicks #Nuggets #Blow #Big #Leads #Wrong #Game #Deadspin.com
Deadspin | Field Level Media’s Top 100   Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images   Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:  1. QB Fernando Mendoza	Indiana (6-5, 225)  2. RB Jeremiyah Love 	Notre Dame (6-0, 210)  3. TE Kenyon Sadiq 	Oregon (6-3, 245)  4. WR Carnell Tate 	Ohio State (6-3, 195)  5. OT Spencer Fano 	Utah (6-4, 300)  6. LB Arvell Reese 	              Ohio State (6-4, 243)  7. EDGE David Bailey 	Texas Tech (6-3, 247)  8. LB Sonny Styles 	Ohio State (6-5, 243)  9. EDGE Keldric Faulk 	Auburn (6-5, 285)  10. OT Kadyn Proctor 	Alabama (6-7, 365)  11. S Caleb Downs 	Ohio State (6-1, 200)  12. WR Makai Lemon 	USC (5-11, 195)  13. OT Francis Mauigoa 	Miami (6-6, 300)  14. CB Mansoor Delane 	LSU (6-0, 190)  15. DT Peter Woods 	Clemson (6-3, 315)  16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr.      Miami (6-2, 270)  17. CB Avieon Terrell 	Clemson (5-11, 190)  18. WR Jordyn Tyson 	Arizona State (6-2, 200)  19. DT Kayden McDonald 	Ohio State (6-2, 326)  20. CB Jermod McCoy 	Tennessee (5-10, 193)  21. OLB Cashius Howell 	Texas A&M (6-2, 249)  22. CB Colton Hood 	Tennessee (6-0, 195)  23. CB Brandon Cisse 	South Carolina (6-0, 190)  24. WR KC Concepcion 	Texas A&M (5-11, 190)  25. QB Ty Simpson 	Alabama (6-2, 208)  26. OT Monroe Freeling 	Georgia (6-7, 315)  27. OT Caleb Lomu 	Utah (6-6, 300)  28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)  29. LB Anthony Hill Jr.           Texas (6-2, 238)  30. OG Vega Ioane 	Penn State (6-4, 323)  31. RB Jadarian Price 	Notre Dame (5-10, 210)  32. C Connor Lew 	              Auburn (6-3, 300)  33. LB Jake Golday 	              Cincinnati (6-4, 240)  34. DT Lee Hunter 	              Texas Tech (6-3, 333)  35. DT Caleb Banks 	Florida (6-6, 334)  36. CB Chris Johnson 	San Diego State (6-0, 185)  37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. 	Indiana (6-0, 204)  38. TE Max Klare 	              Ohio State (6-3, 240)  39. LB CJ Allen 	              Georgia (6-1, 236)  40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor    Miami (6-3, 265)  41. CB Will Lee III 	             Texas A&M (6-1, 191)  42. EDGE Joshua Josephs     Tennessee (6-3, 240)  43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence   UCF (6-4, 247)  44. CB Keith Abney II 	Arizona State (6-0, 190)  45. QB Taylen Green 	Arkansas (6-6, 225)  46. OLB R Mason Thomas 	Oklahoma (6-1, 249)  47. EDGE TJ Parker 	Clemson (6-3, 255)  48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon    Oregon (6-4, 323)  49. OT Max Iheanachor 	Arizona State (6-5, 325)  50. WR Germie Bernard 	Alabama (6-1, 209)   51. EDGE Derrick Moore 	Michigan (6-3, 265)  52. WR Chris Bell 	               Louisville (6-2, 220)  53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)  54. WR Bryce Lance 	North Dakota State (6-3, 210)  55. EDGE LT Overton 	Alabama (6-2, 274)  56. OG Chase Bisontis 	Texas A&M (6-6, 320)  57. EDGE Zion Young 	Missouri (6-5, 255)  58. OT Blake Miller 	Clemson (6-6, 314)  59. DT Domonique Orange    Iowa State (6-2, 325)  60. OT Caleb Tiernan 	Northwestern (6-7, 325)  61. TE Eli Stowers 	              Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)  62. SS Jakobe Thomas 	Miami (6-2, 200)  63. SS DQ Smith 	              South Carolina (6-1, 209)  64. RB Jonah Coleman 	Washington (5-9, 225)  65. OT Markel Bell	              Miami (6-9, 340)  66. WR Ted Hurst 	              Georgia State (6-3, 193)  67. CB Keionte Scott 	Miami (6-0, 195)  68. C Logan Jones 	              Iowa (6-3, 302)  69. C Brian Parker II 	Duke (6-5, 300)  70. FS Bud Clark 	              TCU (6-0, 190)  71. LB Harold Perkins Jr.        LSU (6-1, 222)  72. SS Jalon Kilgore 	South Carolina (6-1, 197)  73. CB Charles Demmings      Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)  74. RB Nick Singleton 	Penn State (6-0, 226)  75. QB Carson Beck 	Miami (6-4, 225)  76. CB Treydan Stukes 	Arizona (6-2, 200)  77. CB Hezekiah Masses 	California (6-1, 185)  78. QB Cade Klubnik 	Clemson (6-1, 210)  79. FS Genesis Smith 	Arizona (6-2, 204)  80. FS Dillon Thieneman        Oregon (6-0, 205)  81. WR Zachariah Branch       Georgia (5-10, 175)  82. WR Chris Brazzell II         Tennessee (6-4, 200)  83. SS A.J. Haulcy                 LSU (5-11, 222)  84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)  85. WR Antonio Williams       Clemson (5-11, 190)  86. OG Gennings Dunker       Iowa (6-5, 315)  87. FS Kamari Ramsey 	USC (6-0, 205)  88. RB Kaytron Allen 	Penn State (5-11, 220)  89. SS Zakee Wheatley 	Penn State (6-2, 192)  90. WR Deion Burks 	Oklahoma (5-9, 190)  91. OT Drew Shelton 	Penn State (6-5, 305)  92. CB Daylen Everette 	Georgia (6-0, 193)  93. OG Anez Cooper 	Miami (6-6, 350)  94. DT Tim Keenan III 	Alabama (6-2, 320)  95. EDGE Patrick Payton         LSU (6-6, 255)  96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia 	SMU (6-1, 205)  97. CB Julian Neal 	              Arkansas (6-2, 208)  98. CB Tacario Davis 	Washington (6-4, 200)  99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr.      Florida State (6-5, 337)  100. EDGE Max Llewellyn       Iowa (6-5, 263)  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #TopIndiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:

1. QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana (6-5, 225)

2. RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame (6-0, 210)

3. TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon (6-3, 245)

4. WR Carnell Tate Ohio State (6-3, 195)

5. OT Spencer Fano Utah (6-4, 300)

6. LB Arvell Reese Ohio State (6-4, 243)

7. EDGE David Bailey Texas Tech (6-3, 247)

8. LB Sonny Styles Ohio State (6-5, 243)

9. EDGE Keldric Faulk Auburn (6-5, 285)

10. OT Kadyn Proctor Alabama (6-7, 365)

11. S Caleb Downs Ohio State (6-1, 200)

12. WR Makai Lemon USC (5-11, 195)

13. OT Francis Mauigoa Miami (6-6, 300)

14. CB Mansoor Delane LSU (6-0, 190)

15. DT Peter Woods Clemson (6-3, 315)

16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Miami (6-2, 270)

17. CB Avieon Terrell Clemson (5-11, 190)

18. WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State (6-2, 200)

19. DT Kayden McDonald Ohio State (6-2, 326)

20. CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee (5-10, 193)

21. OLB Cashius Howell Texas A&M (6-2, 249)

22. CB Colton Hood Tennessee (6-0, 195)

23. CB Brandon Cisse South Carolina (6-0, 190)

24. WR KC Concepcion Texas A&M (5-11, 190)

25. QB Ty Simpson Alabama (6-2, 208)

26. OT Monroe Freeling Georgia (6-7, 315)

27. OT Caleb Lomu Utah (6-6, 300)

28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)

29. LB Anthony Hill Jr. Texas (6-2, 238)

30. OG Vega Ioane Penn State (6-4, 323)

31. RB Jadarian Price Notre Dame (5-10, 210)

32. C Connor Lew Auburn (6-3, 300)

33. LB Jake Golday Cincinnati (6-4, 240)

34. DT Lee Hunter Texas Tech (6-3, 333)

35. DT Caleb Banks Florida (6-6, 334)

36. CB Chris Johnson San Diego State (6-0, 185)

37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. Indiana (6-0, 204)

38. TE Max Klare Ohio State (6-3, 240)

39. LB CJ Allen Georgia (6-1, 236)

40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor Miami (6-3, 265)

41. CB Will Lee III Texas A&M (6-1, 191)

42. EDGE Joshua Josephs Tennessee (6-3, 240)

43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence UCF (6-4, 247)

44. CB Keith Abney II Arizona State (6-0, 190)

45. QB Taylen Green Arkansas (6-6, 225)

46. OLB R Mason Thomas Oklahoma (6-1, 249)

47. EDGE TJ Parker Clemson (6-3, 255)

48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon Oregon (6-4, 323)

49. OT Max Iheanachor Arizona State (6-5, 325)


50. WR Germie Bernard Alabama (6-1, 209)

51. EDGE Derrick Moore Michigan (6-3, 265)

52. WR Chris Bell Louisville (6-2, 220)

53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)

54. WR Bryce Lance North Dakota State (6-3, 210)

55. EDGE LT Overton Alabama (6-2, 274)

56. OG Chase Bisontis Texas A&M (6-6, 320)

57. EDGE Zion Young Missouri (6-5, 255)

58. OT Blake Miller Clemson (6-6, 314)

59. DT Domonique Orange Iowa State (6-2, 325)

60. OT Caleb Tiernan Northwestern (6-7, 325)

61. TE Eli Stowers Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)

62. SS Jakobe Thomas Miami (6-2, 200)

63. SS DQ Smith South Carolina (6-1, 209)

64. RB Jonah Coleman Washington (5-9, 225)

65. OT Markel Bell Miami (6-9, 340)

66. WR Ted Hurst Georgia State (6-3, 193)

67. CB Keionte Scott Miami (6-0, 195)

68. C Logan Jones Iowa (6-3, 302)

69. C Brian Parker II Duke (6-5, 300)

70. FS Bud Clark TCU (6-0, 190)

71. LB Harold Perkins Jr. LSU (6-1, 222)

72. SS Jalon Kilgore South Carolina (6-1, 197)

73. CB Charles Demmings Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)

74. RB Nick Singleton Penn State (6-0, 226)

75. QB Carson Beck Miami (6-4, 225)

76. CB Treydan Stukes Arizona (6-2, 200)

77. CB Hezekiah Masses California (6-1, 185)

78. QB Cade Klubnik Clemson (6-1, 210)

79. FS Genesis Smith Arizona (6-2, 204)

80. FS Dillon Thieneman Oregon (6-0, 205)

81. WR Zachariah Branch Georgia (5-10, 175)

82. WR Chris Brazzell II Tennessee (6-4, 200)

83. SS A.J. Haulcy LSU (5-11, 222)

84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)

85. WR Antonio Williams Clemson (5-11, 190)

86. OG Gennings Dunker Iowa (6-5, 315)

87. FS Kamari Ramsey USC (6-0, 205)

88. RB Kaytron Allen Penn State (5-11, 220)

89. SS Zakee Wheatley Penn State (6-2, 192)

90. WR Deion Burks Oklahoma (5-9, 190)

91. OT Drew Shelton Penn State (6-5, 305)

92. CB Daylen Everette Georgia (6-0, 193)

93. OG Anez Cooper Miami (6-6, 350)

94. DT Tim Keenan III Alabama (6-2, 320)

95. EDGE Patrick Payton LSU (6-6, 255)

96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia SMU (6-1, 205)

97. CB Julian Neal Arkansas (6-2, 208)

98. CB Tacario Davis Washington (6-4, 200)

99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr. Florida State (6-5, 337)

100. EDGE Max Llewellyn Iowa (6-5, 263)


–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #Top">Deadspin | Field Level Media’s Top 100   Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images   Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:  1. QB Fernando Mendoza	Indiana (6-5, 225)  2. RB Jeremiyah Love 	Notre Dame (6-0, 210)  3. TE Kenyon Sadiq 	Oregon (6-3, 245)  4. WR Carnell Tate 	Ohio State (6-3, 195)  5. OT Spencer Fano 	Utah (6-4, 300)  6. LB Arvell Reese 	              Ohio State (6-4, 243)  7. EDGE David Bailey 	Texas Tech (6-3, 247)  8. LB Sonny Styles 	Ohio State (6-5, 243)  9. EDGE Keldric Faulk 	Auburn (6-5, 285)  10. OT Kadyn Proctor 	Alabama (6-7, 365)  11. S Caleb Downs 	Ohio State (6-1, 200)  12. WR Makai Lemon 	USC (5-11, 195)  13. OT Francis Mauigoa 	Miami (6-6, 300)  14. CB Mansoor Delane 	LSU (6-0, 190)  15. DT Peter Woods 	Clemson (6-3, 315)  16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr.      Miami (6-2, 270)  17. CB Avieon Terrell 	Clemson (5-11, 190)  18. WR Jordyn Tyson 	Arizona State (6-2, 200)  19. DT Kayden McDonald 	Ohio State (6-2, 326)  20. CB Jermod McCoy 	Tennessee (5-10, 193)  21. OLB Cashius Howell 	Texas A&M (6-2, 249)  22. CB Colton Hood 	Tennessee (6-0, 195)  23. CB Brandon Cisse 	South Carolina (6-0, 190)  24. WR KC Concepcion 	Texas A&M (5-11, 190)  25. QB Ty Simpson 	Alabama (6-2, 208)  26. OT Monroe Freeling 	Georgia (6-7, 315)  27. OT Caleb Lomu 	Utah (6-6, 300)  28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)  29. LB Anthony Hill Jr.           Texas (6-2, 238)  30. OG Vega Ioane 	Penn State (6-4, 323)  31. RB Jadarian Price 	Notre Dame (5-10, 210)  32. C Connor Lew 	              Auburn (6-3, 300)  33. LB Jake Golday 	              Cincinnati (6-4, 240)  34. DT Lee Hunter 	              Texas Tech (6-3, 333)  35. DT Caleb Banks 	Florida (6-6, 334)  36. CB Chris Johnson 	San Diego State (6-0, 185)  37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. 	Indiana (6-0, 204)  38. TE Max Klare 	              Ohio State (6-3, 240)  39. LB CJ Allen 	              Georgia (6-1, 236)  40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor    Miami (6-3, 265)  41. CB Will Lee III 	             Texas A&M (6-1, 191)  42. EDGE Joshua Josephs     Tennessee (6-3, 240)  43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence   UCF (6-4, 247)  44. CB Keith Abney II 	Arizona State (6-0, 190)  45. QB Taylen Green 	Arkansas (6-6, 225)  46. OLB R Mason Thomas 	Oklahoma (6-1, 249)  47. EDGE TJ Parker 	Clemson (6-3, 255)  48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon    Oregon (6-4, 323)  49. OT Max Iheanachor 	Arizona State (6-5, 325)  50. WR Germie Bernard 	Alabama (6-1, 209)   51. EDGE Derrick Moore 	Michigan (6-3, 265)  52. WR Chris Bell 	               Louisville (6-2, 220)  53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)  54. WR Bryce Lance 	North Dakota State (6-3, 210)  55. EDGE LT Overton 	Alabama (6-2, 274)  56. OG Chase Bisontis 	Texas A&M (6-6, 320)  57. EDGE Zion Young 	Missouri (6-5, 255)  58. OT Blake Miller 	Clemson (6-6, 314)  59. DT Domonique Orange    Iowa State (6-2, 325)  60. OT Caleb Tiernan 	Northwestern (6-7, 325)  61. TE Eli Stowers 	              Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)  62. SS Jakobe Thomas 	Miami (6-2, 200)  63. SS DQ Smith 	              South Carolina (6-1, 209)  64. RB Jonah Coleman 	Washington (5-9, 225)  65. OT Markel Bell	              Miami (6-9, 340)  66. WR Ted Hurst 	              Georgia State (6-3, 193)  67. CB Keionte Scott 	Miami (6-0, 195)  68. C Logan Jones 	              Iowa (6-3, 302)  69. C Brian Parker II 	Duke (6-5, 300)  70. FS Bud Clark 	              TCU (6-0, 190)  71. LB Harold Perkins Jr.        LSU (6-1, 222)  72. SS Jalon Kilgore 	South Carolina (6-1, 197)  73. CB Charles Demmings      Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)  74. RB Nick Singleton 	Penn State (6-0, 226)  75. QB Carson Beck 	Miami (6-4, 225)  76. CB Treydan Stukes 	Arizona (6-2, 200)  77. CB Hezekiah Masses 	California (6-1, 185)  78. QB Cade Klubnik 	Clemson (6-1, 210)  79. FS Genesis Smith 	Arizona (6-2, 204)  80. FS Dillon Thieneman        Oregon (6-0, 205)  81. WR Zachariah Branch       Georgia (5-10, 175)  82. WR Chris Brazzell II         Tennessee (6-4, 200)  83. SS A.J. Haulcy                 LSU (5-11, 222)  84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)  85. WR Antonio Williams       Clemson (5-11, 190)  86. OG Gennings Dunker       Iowa (6-5, 315)  87. FS Kamari Ramsey 	USC (6-0, 205)  88. RB Kaytron Allen 	Penn State (5-11, 220)  89. SS Zakee Wheatley 	Penn State (6-2, 192)  90. WR Deion Burks 	Oklahoma (5-9, 190)  91. OT Drew Shelton 	Penn State (6-5, 305)  92. CB Daylen Everette 	Georgia (6-0, 193)  93. OG Anez Cooper 	Miami (6-6, 350)  94. DT Tim Keenan III 	Alabama (6-2, 320)  95. EDGE Patrick Payton         LSU (6-6, 255)  96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia 	SMU (6-1, 205)  97. CB Julian Neal 	              Arkansas (6-2, 208)  98. CB Tacario Davis 	Washington (6-4, 200)  99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr.      Florida State (6-5, 337)  100. EDGE Max Llewellyn       Iowa (6-5, 263)  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #Top

Post Comment