×
The complete list of winners at the 2026 Golden Globes

The complete list of winners at the 2026 Golden Globes

Tech-news

The 83rd Golden Globe Awards ceremony is being held in California tonight, with actors and filmmakers flocking to the Beverly Hilton hotel once more to celebrate the last year in entertainment. Hosted by Nikki Glaser for the second consecutive year, the 2026 Golden Globe Awards introduces the new Best Podcast category for the first time. Even so, the primary focus is still squarely on television and film.

One Battle After Another is kicking off the night with the most bites at the apple, boasting a total of nine nominations including Best Motion Picture — Musical or Comedy and Best Director (Paul Thomas Anderson). Also competing for Best Director are Sinners (Ryan Coogler) and Hamnet (Chloé Zhao), which follow One Battle After Another in nomination count with seven and six respectively.

Mashable Top Stories

Meanwhile, The White Lotus dominated the television categories with six nominations, while Adolescence nabbed five and Only Murders in the Building and Severance earned four each.

Here is the full list of nominees and winners at the 83rd Golden Globe Awards. This article is being updated live, with winners bolded as they are announced. You can watch the Golden Globe Awards ceremony live from 8 p.m. ET/5 p.m. PT on CBS and Paramount+. 

Best Motion Picture — Drama

Best Motion Picture — Musical or Comedy

Best Motion Picture — Animated

Cinematic and Box Office Achievement

Best Motion Picture — Non-English Language

  • It Was Just an Accident (France)

  • No Other Choice (South Korea)

  • The Secret Agent (Brazil)

  • Sentimental Value (Norway)

  • Sirāt (Spain)

  • The Voice of Hind Rajab (Tunisia)

Best Performance by a Female Actor in a Motion Picture — Drama 

Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Motion Picture — Drama

Best Performance by a Female Actor in a Motion Picture — Musical or Comedy 

Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Motion Picture — Musical or Comedy 

  • Timothée Chalamet (Marty Supreme)

  • George Clooney (Jay Kelly)

  • Leonardo Dicaprio (One Battle After Another)

  • Ethan Hawke (Blue Moon)

  • Lee Byung-Hun (No Other Choice)

  • Jesse Plemons (Bugonia)

Best Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role in Any Motion Picture

  • Emily Blunt (The Smashing Machine)

  • Elle Fanning (Sentimental Value)

  • Ariana Grande (Wicked: For Good)

  • Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas (Sentimental Value)

  • Amy Madigan (Weapons)

  • Teyana Taylor (One Battle After Another)

Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role in Any Motion Picture 

  • Benicio Del Toro (One Battle After Another)

  • Jacob Elordi (Frankenstein)

  • Paul Mescal (Hamnet)

  • Sean Penn (One Battle After Another)

  • Adam Sandler (Jay Kelly)

  • Stellan Skarsgård (Sentimental Value)

Best Director — Motion Picture

  • Paul Thomas Anderson (One Battle After Another)

  • Ryan Coogler (Sinners)

  • Guillermo Del Toro (Frankenstein)

  • Jafar Panahi (It Was Just an Accident)

  • Joachim Trier (Sentimental Value)

  • Chloé Zhao (Hamnet)

Best Screenplay — Motion Picture

  • Paul Thomas Anderson (One Battle After Another)

  • Ronald Bronstein and Josh Safdie (Marty Supreme)

  • Ryan Coogler (Sinners)

  • Jafar Panahi (It Was Just an Accident)

  • Eskil Vogt and Joachim Trier (Sentimental Value)

  • Chloé Zhao and Maggie O’Farrell (Hamnet)

Best Original Score — Motion Picture 

  • Alexandre Desplat (Frankenstein)

  • Ludwig Göransson (Sinners)

  • Jonny Greenwood (One Battle After Another)

  • Kangding Ray (Sirāt)

  • Max Richter (Hamnet)

  • Hans Zimmer (F1)

Best Original Song — Motion Picture

  • “Dream as One” (Avatar: Fire and Ash)

  • “Golden” (Kpop Demon Hunters)

  • “I Lied to You” (Sinners)

  • “No Place Like Home” (Wicked: For Good)

  • “The Girl in the Bubble” (Wicked: For Good)

  • “Train Dreams” (Train Dreams)

Best Television Series — Drama 

Best Television Series — Musical or Comedy

Best Television Limited Series, Anthology Series or Motion Picture Made for Television

Best Performance by a Female Actor in a Television Series — Drama 

  • Kathy Bates (Matlock)

  • Britt Lower (Severance)

  • Helen Mirren (Mobland)

  • Bella Ramsey (The Last of Us)

  • Keri Russell (The Diplomat)

  • Rhea Seehorn (Pluribus)

Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Television Series — Drama 

  • Sterling K. Brown (Paradise)

  • Diego Luna (Andor)

  • Gary Oldman (Slow Horses)

  • Mark Ruffalo (Task)

  • Adam Scott (Severance)

  • Noah Wyle (The Pitt)

Best Performance by a Female Actor in a Television Series — Musical or Comedy 

  • Kristen Bell (Nobody Wants This)

  • Ayo Edebiri (The Bear)

  • Selena Gomez (Only Murders in the Building)

  • Natasha Lyonne (Poker Face)

  • Jenna Ortega (Wednesday)

  • Jean Smart (Hacks)

Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Television Series — Musical or Comedy 

  • Adam Brody (Nobody Wants This)

  • Steve Martin (Only Murders in the Building)

  • Glen Powell (Chad Powers)

  • Seth Rogen (The Studio)

  • Martin Short (Only Murders in the Building)

  • Jeremy Allen White (The Bear)

Best Performance by a Female Actor in a Limited Series, Anthology Series or a Motion Picture Made for Television 

  • Claire Danes (The Beast in Me)

  • Rashida Jones (Black Mirror)

  • Amanda Seyfried (Long Bright River)

  • Sarah Snook (All Her Fault)

  • Michelle Williams (Dying for Sex)

  • Robin Wright (The Girlfriend)

Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Limited Series, Anthology Series or a Motion Picture Made for Television 

  • Jacob Elordi (The Narrow Road to the Deep North)

  • Paul Giamatti (Black Mirror)

  • Stephen Graham (Adolescence)

  • Charlie Hunnam (Monster: The Ed Gein Story)

  • Jude Law (Black Rabbit)

  • Matthew Rhys (The Beast in Me)

Best Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role on Television 

  • Carrie Coon (The White Lotus)

  • Erin Doherty (Adolescence)

  • Hannah Einbinder (Hacks)

  • Catherine O’Hara (The Studio)

  • Parker Posey (The White Lotus)

  • Aimee Lou Wood (The White Lotus)

Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role on Television 

  • Owen Cooper (Adolescence)

  • Billy Crudup (The Morning Show)

  • Walton Goggins (The White Lotus)

  • Jason Isaacs (The White Lotus)

  • Tramell Tillman (Severance)

  • Ashley Walters (Adolescence)

Best Performance in Stand-Up Comedy on Television

  • Bill Maher (Bill Maher: Is Anyone Else Seeing This?)

  • Brett Goldstein (Brett Goldstein: The Second Best Night of Your Life)

  • Kevin Hart (Kevin Hart: Acting My Age)

  • Kumail Nanjiani (Kumail Nanjiani: Night Thoughts)

  • Ricky Gervais (Ricky Gervais: Mortality)

  • Sarah Silverman (Sarah Silverman: Postmortem)

Best Podcast

Source link
#complete #list #winners #Golden #Globes

Related Posts

White House officials are exploring official government oversight of new AI models, according to the New York Times.

U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told the publication that the Trump administration is forming an AI working group composed of tech leaders and government representatives. The group will be tasked with outlining potential oversight procedures for new models launching to market, including formal review processes, the Times reported.

SEE ALSO: Student sues matchmaking app for allegedly stealing her likeness for an ad

The proposed plans were discussed at a White House meeting last week with representatives from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI.

Potentially influenced by regulatory processes announced by UK regulators, which relegate AI oversight to relevant government bodies, the working group would also determine which U.S. agencies would be tasked with oversight. Some officials have suggested the National Security Agency (NSA), the White House Office of the National Cyber Director, and the director of national intelligence take the lead, while others have even suggested revitalizing the Biden-era Center for A.I. Standards and Innovation, according to the Times.

The administration has reversed its stance on AI regulation in recent months, despite announcing a federal AI action plan that pulled back on regulation of tech companies and threatened to reduce federal funding for states that impeded AI infrastructure efforts through regulation. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill also included limits on state governments’ AI regulation, originally proposing a 10-year moratorium on state action in favor of federal oversight.

Trump appointee and FCC chairman Brendan Carr has also advocated for a light-touch approach to AI regulation.

#Trump #federal #model #oversight">Trump considering federal AI model oversight White House officials are exploring official government oversight of new AI models, according to the New York Times. U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told the publication that the Trump administration is forming an AI working group composed of tech leaders and government representatives. The group will be tasked with outlining potential oversight procedures for new models launching to market, including formal review processes, the Times reported. SEE ALSO: Student sues matchmaking app for allegedly stealing her likeness for an ad The proposed plans were discussed at a White House meeting last week with representatives from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI. Mashable Light Speed Potentially influenced by regulatory processes announced by UK regulators, which relegate AI oversight to relevant government bodies, the working group would also determine which U.S. agencies would be tasked with oversight. Some officials have suggested the National Security Agency (NSA), the White House Office of the National Cyber Director, and the director of national intelligence take the lead, while others have even suggested revitalizing the Biden-era Center for A.I. Standards and Innovation, according to the Times. The administration has reversed its stance on AI regulation in recent months, despite announcing a federal AI action plan that pulled back on regulation of tech companies and threatened to reduce federal funding for states that impeded AI infrastructure efforts through regulation. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill also included limits on state governments’ AI regulation, originally proposing a 10-year moratorium on state action in favor of federal oversight. Trump appointee and FCC chairman Brendan Carr has also advocated for a light-touch approach to AI regulation. #Trump #federal #model #oversight

government oversight of new AI models, according to the New York Times.

U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told the publication that the Trump administration is forming an AI working group composed of tech leaders and government representatives. The group will be tasked with outlining potential oversight procedures for new models launching to market, including formal review processes, the Times reported.

SEE ALSO: Student sues matchmaking app for allegedly stealing her likeness for an ad

The proposed plans were discussed at a White House meeting last week with representatives from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI.

Potentially influenced by regulatory processes announced by UK regulators, which relegate AI oversight to relevant government bodies, the working group would also determine which U.S. agencies would be tasked with oversight. Some officials have suggested the National Security Agency (NSA), the White House Office of the National Cyber Director, and the director of national intelligence take the lead, while others have even suggested revitalizing the Biden-era Center for A.I. Standards and Innovation, according to the Times.

The administration has reversed its stance on AI regulation in recent months, despite announcing a federal AI action plan that pulled back on regulation of tech companies and threatened to reduce federal funding for states that impeded AI infrastructure efforts through regulation. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill also included limits on state governments’ AI regulation, originally proposing a 10-year moratorium on state action in favor of federal oversight.

Trump appointee and FCC chairman Brendan Carr has also advocated for a light-touch approach to AI regulation.

#Trump #federal #model #oversight">Trump considering federal AI model oversight

White House officials are exploring official government oversight of new AI models, according to the New York Times.

U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told the publication that the Trump administration is forming an AI working group composed of tech leaders and government representatives. The group will be tasked with outlining potential oversight procedures for new models launching to market, including formal review processes, the Times reported.

SEE ALSO: Student sues matchmaking app for allegedly stealing her likeness for an ad

The proposed plans were discussed at a White House meeting last week with representatives from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI.

Potentially influenced by regulatory processes announced by UK regulators, which relegate AI oversight to relevant government bodies, the working group would also determine which U.S. agencies would be tasked with oversight. Some officials have suggested the National Security Agency (NSA), the White House Office of the National Cyber Director, and the director of national intelligence take the lead, while others have even suggested revitalizing the Biden-era Center for A.I. Standards and Innovation, according to the Times.

The administration has reversed its stance on AI regulation in recent months, despite announcing a federal AI action plan that pulled back on regulation of tech companies and threatened to reduce federal funding for states that impeded AI infrastructure efforts through regulation. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill also included limits on state governments’ AI regulation, originally proposing a 10-year moratorium on state action in favor of federal oversight.

Trump appointee and FCC chairman Brendan Carr has also advocated for a light-touch approach to AI regulation.

#Trump #federal #model #oversight

On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an amended complaint to add the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003 (the “Revocable Trust”) as a defendant to this action. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants failed to timely file a beneficial ownership report with the Commission after the Revocable Trust acquired beneficial ownership of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of Twitter, Inc. common stock, in violation of the beneficial ownership reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).

The SEC simultaneously moved for entry of a consent final judgment as to the Revocable Trust. Without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint as to the Revocable Trust, the Revocable Trust consented to entry of a final judgment, subject to court approval, that would permanently enjoin it from violating Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1 thereunder and order it to pay a civil penalty of $1.5 million.

As explained in the consent motion, if the court enters the proposed final judgment as to the Revocable Trust as proposed by the Revocable Trust and the SEC, the SEC will file a stipulated dismissal of Elon Musk in his personal capacity, which will resolve this case in its entirety.

#Elon #Musk #settle #feds #Twitter #lawsuit #pocket #changeElon Musk,Law,News,Policy,Tech,Twitter – X">Elon Musk will settle the feds’ Twitter lawsuit with pocket changeOn May 4, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an amended complaint to add the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003 (the “Revocable Trust”) as a defendant to this action. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants failed to timely file a beneficial ownership report with the Commission after the Revocable Trust acquired beneficial ownership of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of Twitter, Inc. common stock, in violation of the beneficial ownership reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).The SEC simultaneously moved for entry of a consent final judgment as to the Revocable Trust. Without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint as to the Revocable Trust, the Revocable Trust consented to entry of a final judgment, subject to court approval, that would permanently enjoin it from violating Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1 thereunder and order it to pay a civil penalty of .5 million.As explained in the consent motion, if the court enters the proposed final judgment as to the Revocable Trust as proposed by the Revocable Trust and the SEC, the SEC will file a stipulated dismissal of Elon Musk in his personal capacity, which will resolve this case in its entirety.#Elon #Musk #settle #feds #Twitter #lawsuit #pocket #changeElon Musk,Law,News,Policy,Tech,Twitter – X


Image model releases are driving growth for AI mobile apps, generating 6.5x more downloads than traditional model updates, according to a new report from app intelligence provider Appfigures.

This marks a shift from earlier days, when the release of new models powering the conversational experiences drove more demand, alongside the new features like a voice chat interface.

For instance, ChatGPT and Gemini each added tens of millions of new downloads after releasing their respective image models, Appfigures found.

For Google’s Gemini, the release of its image model Nano Banana drove an additional 22+ million downloads in the 28 days following the introduction of the Gemini 2.5 Flash image model last August. This launch lifted the app’s downloads by more than 4x over that period, the data showed.

Image AI models now drive app growth, beating chatbot upgrades | TechCrunch Image model releases are driving growth for AI mobile apps, generating 6.5x more downloads than traditional model updates, according to a new report from app intelligence provider Appfigures. This marks a shift from earlier days, when the release of new models powering the conversational experiences drove more demand, alongside the new features like a voice chat interface. For instance, ChatGPT and Gemini each added tens of millions of new downloads after releasing their respective image models, Appfigures found. For Google’s Gemini, the release of its image model Nano Banana drove an additional 22+ million downloads in the 28 days following the introduction of the Gemini 2.5 Flash image model last August. This launch lifted the app’s downloads by more than 4x over that period, the data showed. Image Credits:Appfigures Meanwhile, ChatGPT added more than 12 million incremental installs in the 28 days after the introduction of its GPT-4o image model in March of last year. That’s roughly 4.5x more downloads than it saw for its GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-5 model releases, Appfigures pointed out. Other model releases followed similar trends, though on a smaller scale. Meta AI’s introduction of its AI video feed Vibes added an estimated 2.6 million incremental downloads in the 28 days after its September 2025 release. (Yes, technically, this is a video model, but it’s ultimately about visual content, not just text.) Image Credits:Appfigures Still, the report cautioned, additional downloads don’t always translate into increased mobile revenue. Techcrunch event San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026 Instead, new image model releases give people a reason to install the app and try out its improved image-generation capabilities. That doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily convert to paying subscribers. For example, Appfigures noted that Nano Banana drove only 1,000 in estimated gross consumer spending during the 28-day window following its release, even though it produced a larger spike in downloads than ChatGPT’s 4o image model release. Meta AI’s launch of Vibes also led to additional downloads, but no meaningful revenue. Among the three, only ChatGPT turned the increased attention into actual dollars. OpenAI’s 4o image-generation model led to an estimated million in gross consumer spending over the 28 days after its launch, compared with its prior baseline, Appfigures said. Image Credits:Appfigures The company also looked at DeepSeek in its analysis, but it didn’t fit the pattern. While DeepSeek R1 drove 28 million downloads after its January 2025 release, it wasn’t a typical model comparison event. This was DeepSeek’s breakout moment, when it went from being relatively unknown to an overnight sensation as the tech industry learned about the techniques it used to train its AI models at a fraction of the cost of its competitors. This case highlights how curiosity can drive downloads — though in this instance, the interest wasn’t tied to an image model. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Image #models #drive #app #growth #beating #chatbot #upgrades #TechCrunchai apps,ChatGPT,gemini,image models,meta ai
Image Credits:Appfigures

Meanwhile, ChatGPT added more than 12 million incremental installs in the 28 days after the introduction of its GPT-4o image model in March of last year. That’s roughly 4.5x more downloads than it saw for its GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-5 model releases, Appfigures pointed out.

Other model releases followed similar trends, though on a smaller scale. Meta AI’s introduction of its AI video feed Vibes added an estimated 2.6 million incremental downloads in the 28 days after its September 2025 release. (Yes, technically, this is a video model, but it’s ultimately about visual content, not just text.)

Image Credits:Appfigures

Still, the report cautioned, additional downloads don’t always translate into increased mobile revenue.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026

Instead, new image model releases give people a reason to install the app and try out its improved image-generation capabilities. That doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily convert to paying subscribers. For example, Appfigures noted that Nano Banana drove only $181,000 in estimated gross consumer spending during the 28-day window following its release, even though it produced a larger spike in downloads than ChatGPT’s 4o image model release.

Meta AI’s launch of Vibes also led to additional downloads, but no meaningful revenue.

Among the three, only ChatGPT turned the increased attention into actual dollars.

OpenAI’s 4o image-generation model led to an estimated $70 million in gross consumer spending over the 28 days after its launch, compared with its prior baseline, Appfigures said.

Image Credits:Appfigures

The company also looked at DeepSeek in its analysis, but it didn’t fit the pattern.

While DeepSeek R1 drove 28 million downloads after its January 2025 release, it wasn’t a typical model comparison event. This was DeepSeek’s breakout moment, when it went from being relatively unknown to an overnight sensation as the tech industry learned about the techniques it used to train its AI models at a fraction of the cost of its competitors. This case highlights how curiosity can drive downloads — though in this instance, the interest wasn’t tied to an image model.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Image #models #drive #app #growth #beating #chatbot #upgrades #TechCrunchai apps,ChatGPT,gemini,image models,meta ai">Image AI models now drive app growth, beating chatbot upgrades | TechCrunch Image model releases are driving growth for AI mobile apps, generating 6.5x more downloads than traditional model updates, according to a new report from app intelligence provider Appfigures. This marks a shift from earlier days, when the release of new models powering the conversational experiences drove more demand, alongside the new features like a voice chat interface. For instance, ChatGPT and Gemini each added tens of millions of new downloads after releasing their respective image models, Appfigures found. For Google’s Gemini, the release of its image model Nano Banana drove an additional 22+ million downloads in the 28 days following the introduction of the Gemini 2.5 Flash image model last August. This launch lifted the app’s downloads by more than 4x over that period, the data showed. Image Credits:Appfigures Meanwhile, ChatGPT added more than 12 million incremental installs in the 28 days after the introduction of its GPT-4o image model in March of last year. That’s roughly 4.5x more downloads than it saw for its GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-5 model releases, Appfigures pointed out. Other model releases followed similar trends, though on a smaller scale. Meta AI’s introduction of its AI video feed Vibes added an estimated 2.6 million incremental downloads in the 28 days after its September 2025 release. (Yes, technically, this is a video model, but it’s ultimately about visual content, not just text.) Image Credits:Appfigures Still, the report cautioned, additional downloads don’t always translate into increased mobile revenue. Techcrunch event San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026 Instead, new image model releases give people a reason to install the app and try out its improved image-generation capabilities. That doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily convert to paying subscribers. For example, Appfigures noted that Nano Banana drove only 1,000 in estimated gross consumer spending during the 28-day window following its release, even though it produced a larger spike in downloads than ChatGPT’s 4o image model release. Meta AI’s launch of Vibes also led to additional downloads, but no meaningful revenue. Among the three, only ChatGPT turned the increased attention into actual dollars. OpenAI’s 4o image-generation model led to an estimated million in gross consumer spending over the 28 days after its launch, compared with its prior baseline, Appfigures said. Image Credits:Appfigures The company also looked at DeepSeek in its analysis, but it didn’t fit the pattern. While DeepSeek R1 drove 28 million downloads after its January 2025 release, it wasn’t a typical model comparison event. This was DeepSeek’s breakout moment, when it went from being relatively unknown to an overnight sensation as the tech industry learned about the techniques it used to train its AI models at a fraction of the cost of its competitors. This case highlights how curiosity can drive downloads — though in this instance, the interest wasn’t tied to an image model. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Image #models #drive #app #growth #beating #chatbot #upgrades #TechCrunchai apps,ChatGPT,gemini,image models,meta ai

new models powering the conversational experiences drove more demand, alongside the new features like a voice chat interface.

For instance, ChatGPT and Gemini each added tens of millions of new downloads after releasing their respective image models, Appfigures found.

For Google’s Gemini, the release of its image model Nano Banana drove an additional 22+ million downloads in the 28 days following the introduction of the Gemini 2.5 Flash image model last August. This launch lifted the app’s downloads by more than 4x over that period, the data showed.

Image AI models now drive app growth, beating chatbot upgrades | TechCrunch Image model releases are driving growth for AI mobile apps, generating 6.5x more downloads than traditional model updates, according to a new report from app intelligence provider Appfigures. This marks a shift from earlier days, when the release of new models powering the conversational experiences drove more demand, alongside the new features like a voice chat interface. For instance, ChatGPT and Gemini each added tens of millions of new downloads after releasing their respective image models, Appfigures found. For Google’s Gemini, the release of its image model Nano Banana drove an additional 22+ million downloads in the 28 days following the introduction of the Gemini 2.5 Flash image model last August. This launch lifted the app’s downloads by more than 4x over that period, the data showed. Image Credits:Appfigures Meanwhile, ChatGPT added more than 12 million incremental installs in the 28 days after the introduction of its GPT-4o image model in March of last year. That’s roughly 4.5x more downloads than it saw for its GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-5 model releases, Appfigures pointed out. Other model releases followed similar trends, though on a smaller scale. Meta AI’s introduction of its AI video feed Vibes added an estimated 2.6 million incremental downloads in the 28 days after its September 2025 release. (Yes, technically, this is a video model, but it’s ultimately about visual content, not just text.) Image Credits:Appfigures Still, the report cautioned, additional downloads don’t always translate into increased mobile revenue. Techcrunch event San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026 Instead, new image model releases give people a reason to install the app and try out its improved image-generation capabilities. That doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily convert to paying subscribers. For example, Appfigures noted that Nano Banana drove only 1,000 in estimated gross consumer spending during the 28-day window following its release, even though it produced a larger spike in downloads than ChatGPT’s 4o image model release. Meta AI’s launch of Vibes also led to additional downloads, but no meaningful revenue. Among the three, only ChatGPT turned the increased attention into actual dollars. OpenAI’s 4o image-generation model led to an estimated million in gross consumer spending over the 28 days after its launch, compared with its prior baseline, Appfigures said. Image Credits:Appfigures The company also looked at DeepSeek in its analysis, but it didn’t fit the pattern. While DeepSeek R1 drove 28 million downloads after its January 2025 release, it wasn’t a typical model comparison event. This was DeepSeek’s breakout moment, when it went from being relatively unknown to an overnight sensation as the tech industry learned about the techniques it used to train its AI models at a fraction of the cost of its competitors. This case highlights how curiosity can drive downloads — though in this instance, the interest wasn’t tied to an image model. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Image #models #drive #app #growth #beating #chatbot #upgrades #TechCrunchai apps,ChatGPT,gemini,image models,meta ai
Image Credits:Appfigures

Meanwhile, ChatGPT added more than 12 million incremental installs in the 28 days after the introduction of its GPT-4o image model in March of last year. That’s roughly 4.5x more downloads than it saw for its GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-5 model releases, Appfigures pointed out.

Other model releases followed similar trends, though on a smaller scale. Meta AI’s introduction of its AI video feed Vibes added an estimated 2.6 million incremental downloads in the 28 days after its September 2025 release. (Yes, technically, this is a video model, but it’s ultimately about visual content, not just text.)

Image Credits:Appfigures

Still, the report cautioned, additional downloads don’t always translate into increased mobile revenue.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026

Instead, new image model releases give people a reason to install the app and try out its improved image-generation capabilities. That doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily convert to paying subscribers. For example, Appfigures noted that Nano Banana drove only $181,000 in estimated gross consumer spending during the 28-day window following its release, even though it produced a larger spike in downloads than ChatGPT’s 4o image model release.

Meta AI’s launch of Vibes also led to additional downloads, but no meaningful revenue.

Among the three, only ChatGPT turned the increased attention into actual dollars.

OpenAI’s 4o image-generation model led to an estimated $70 million in gross consumer spending over the 28 days after its launch, compared with its prior baseline, Appfigures said.

Image Credits:Appfigures

The company also looked at DeepSeek in its analysis, but it didn’t fit the pattern.

While DeepSeek R1 drove 28 million downloads after its January 2025 release, it wasn’t a typical model comparison event. This was DeepSeek’s breakout moment, when it went from being relatively unknown to an overnight sensation as the tech industry learned about the techniques it used to train its AI models at a fraction of the cost of its competitors. This case highlights how curiosity can drive downloads — though in this instance, the interest wasn’t tied to an image model.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Image #models #drive #app #growth #beating #chatbot #upgrades #TechCrunchai apps,ChatGPT,gemini,image models,meta ai">Image AI models now drive app growth, beating chatbot upgrades | TechCrunch


Image model releases are driving growth for AI mobile apps, generating 6.5x more downloads than traditional model updates, according to a new report from app intelligence provider Appfigures.

This marks a shift from earlier days, when the release of new models powering the conversational experiences drove more demand, alongside the new features like a voice chat interface.

For instance, ChatGPT and Gemini each added tens of millions of new downloads after releasing their respective image models, Appfigures found.

For Google’s Gemini, the release of its image model Nano Banana drove an additional 22+ million downloads in the 28 days following the introduction of the Gemini 2.5 Flash image model last August. This launch lifted the app’s downloads by more than 4x over that period, the data showed.

Image AI models now drive app growth, beating chatbot upgrades | TechCrunch Image model releases are driving growth for AI mobile apps, generating 6.5x more downloads than traditional model updates, according to a new report from app intelligence provider Appfigures. This marks a shift from earlier days, when the release of new models powering the conversational experiences drove more demand, alongside the new features like a voice chat interface. For instance, ChatGPT and Gemini each added tens of millions of new downloads after releasing their respective image models, Appfigures found. For Google’s Gemini, the release of its image model Nano Banana drove an additional 22+ million downloads in the 28 days following the introduction of the Gemini 2.5 Flash image model last August. This launch lifted the app’s downloads by more than 4x over that period, the data showed. Image Credits:Appfigures Meanwhile, ChatGPT added more than 12 million incremental installs in the 28 days after the introduction of its GPT-4o image model in March of last year. That’s roughly 4.5x more downloads than it saw for its GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-5 model releases, Appfigures pointed out. Other model releases followed similar trends, though on a smaller scale. Meta AI’s introduction of its AI video feed Vibes added an estimated 2.6 million incremental downloads in the 28 days after its September 2025 release. (Yes, technically, this is a video model, but it’s ultimately about visual content, not just text.) Image Credits:Appfigures Still, the report cautioned, additional downloads don’t always translate into increased mobile revenue. Techcrunch event San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026 Instead, new image model releases give people a reason to install the app and try out its improved image-generation capabilities. That doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily convert to paying subscribers. For example, Appfigures noted that Nano Banana drove only 1,000 in estimated gross consumer spending during the 28-day window following its release, even though it produced a larger spike in downloads than ChatGPT’s 4o image model release. Meta AI’s launch of Vibes also led to additional downloads, but no meaningful revenue. Among the three, only ChatGPT turned the increased attention into actual dollars. OpenAI’s 4o image-generation model led to an estimated million in gross consumer spending over the 28 days after its launch, compared with its prior baseline, Appfigures said. Image Credits:Appfigures The company also looked at DeepSeek in its analysis, but it didn’t fit the pattern. While DeepSeek R1 drove 28 million downloads after its January 2025 release, it wasn’t a typical model comparison event. This was DeepSeek’s breakout moment, when it went from being relatively unknown to an overnight sensation as the tech industry learned about the techniques it used to train its AI models at a fraction of the cost of its competitors. This case highlights how curiosity can drive downloads — though in this instance, the interest wasn’t tied to an image model. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Image #models #drive #app #growth #beating #chatbot #upgrades #TechCrunchai apps,ChatGPT,gemini,image models,meta ai
Image Credits:Appfigures

Meanwhile, ChatGPT added more than 12 million incremental installs in the 28 days after the introduction of its GPT-4o image model in March of last year. That’s roughly 4.5x more downloads than it saw for its GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-5 model releases, Appfigures pointed out.

Other model releases followed similar trends, though on a smaller scale. Meta AI’s introduction of its AI video feed Vibes added an estimated 2.6 million incremental downloads in the 28 days after its September 2025 release. (Yes, technically, this is a video model, but it’s ultimately about visual content, not just text.)

Image Credits:Appfigures

Still, the report cautioned, additional downloads don’t always translate into increased mobile revenue.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026

Instead, new image model releases give people a reason to install the app and try out its improved image-generation capabilities. That doesn’t mean they’ll necessarily convert to paying subscribers. For example, Appfigures noted that Nano Banana drove only $181,000 in estimated gross consumer spending during the 28-day window following its release, even though it produced a larger spike in downloads than ChatGPT’s 4o image model release.

Meta AI’s launch of Vibes also led to additional downloads, but no meaningful revenue.

Among the three, only ChatGPT turned the increased attention into actual dollars.

OpenAI’s 4o image-generation model led to an estimated $70 million in gross consumer spending over the 28 days after its launch, compared with its prior baseline, Appfigures said.

Image Credits:Appfigures

The company also looked at DeepSeek in its analysis, but it didn’t fit the pattern.

While DeepSeek R1 drove 28 million downloads after its January 2025 release, it wasn’t a typical model comparison event. This was DeepSeek’s breakout moment, when it went from being relatively unknown to an overnight sensation as the tech industry learned about the techniques it used to train its AI models at a fraction of the cost of its competitors. This case highlights how curiosity can drive downloads — though in this instance, the interest wasn’t tied to an image model.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Image #models #drive #app #growth #beating #chatbot #upgrades #TechCrunchai apps,ChatGPT,gemini,image models,meta ai

Post Comment