×
What the NBA Draft Should Learn From the 2026 NFL Draft | Deadspin.com   The NFL turned its most popular off-season extravaganza into a golf tournament this week.Maybe they couldn’t hear it, but the silence on our end of the cable hook-up was deafening.I understand why golf fans want the world’s top players to pick up the pace. There’s only so much a broadcaster can say about a guy’s cool sunglasses on his excruciatingly long walk to a 350-yard drive.But a professional draft is different, especially when fans are as invested as they are in football. And basketball, for that matter.Thursday’s telecast of the NFL Draft’s first round had to make Bob Hayes proud. It flew by.Not coincidentally, it had to go down as a JaMarcus Russell – the worst of all-time, flawed in so many ways.But there’s good news: The NBA should have learned a whole lot in terms of What Not To Include in the script for its big night in June.Here are six suggestions.Say SomethingI found it interesting that some day-after critics of ABC’s telecast found it noteworthy that Nick Saban labeled one selection “not really a self-starter.”Wow. Scathing. Potentially libelous. Shocked he wasn’t dismissed from the panel immediately.OK, maybe not.That was the most controversial thing Saban said all night, the only utterance to which fired-up football fans in TV-land screamed back: “Yeah. You tell ‘em, Coach. The guy is fat and out of shape. Been saying that all season.”That’s why we gathered the gang, slipped on our 2025 Fantasy Football Champs t-shirts and poured the Mexican Coke. We didn’t come to hear “Go Wolverines” and “Go Buckeyes” from Saban’s sidekicks.A draft inspires debate. Half a team’s fan base has been calling talk radio for weeks demanding their scouting chops go regional. The other half has waited until day-after to let everyone know they heard it here first: Our pick blows.Yet all we heard on NFL Day 1 was how coachable the kid was and what a great fit he’d be.THIRTY-TWO TIMES.Give me …Ban CheerleadersIt all starts with the panel. Ernie Johnson is the perfect NBA host.Then you need book-end blowhards. The Republican and the Democrat, if you will.Stephen A. Smith is ideal. Informed, well spoken and, most importantly, loud.Then you need someone equally bull-headed, but ideally from a basketball background. I see him, but it would be bold – Draymond Green the player/analyst.In between, we only have Johnson … because I’m saving the fourth virtual seat for a real game-breaker. If you thought Green was out there … Stay tuned.“I Want to Thank …”The three biggest wastes of time on draft night are:“I wouldn’t be here without my mom.” (Every player interview.)“We’re so proud.” (Every parent interview.)“Can you describe your feelings?” (Every interviewer.)It reminds me – time and time and time again – of a roving baseball reporter in the stands chatting with a rookie outfielder’s family while a no-hitter is going on.Can we get back to the action?No interviews!“Jeopardy” Can WaitWhat’s the rush? We’ve tuned in to welcome (or trash) our new baby. Let’s spend the night together.Fifteen minutes between picks seems perfectly fine.There are two aspects of each pick that every fan of that team wants to hear experts dissect: The current state of the team (leading into who would be the ideal addition) and the snap-judgement fit/ramifications of the pick itself in the immediate aftermath of it having been made.Five minutes of the former and five minutes of the latter might not be enough time. OK, so how about six of each? It’s the best we can do.Throw in your three minutes of commercials and you have 15 minutes of absolute sports heaven sandwiching each pick. Times 30.Not eight (down from 10) like the NFL sped us through in its all-important Round 1.What’s Must-See TV Without a Celebrity?Sadly I must admit: Yes, you can have too much Stephen A. Smith. So let’s trump his and Draymond’s dueling haymakers with a “wow-inducing” local expert with something of substance to say about each pick.I’m talking Barack Obama living and dying with his beloved Bulls. Kevin Hart, Peyton Manning, Patrick Mahomes, David Letterman, Tiger Woods, Uma Thurman, Drake, Billy Crystal, Dianna Russini …You’ve now elevated your telecast to Academy Awards level. And the great thing about these ultimate attention-grabbers – every team has at least one – is they would kill to have their basketball expertise heard. You know, like real fans.Each joins the debate for his/her team via satellite, shoehorned into the six-minute lead-in and the six-minute critique. Tell me you wouldn’t tune in for that.It sure beats watching them actually try to play in a celebrity game.You Make The CallThirty teams with 15 minutes between picks. Give me a second … that’s 7 1/2 hours. Yikes.How in the world can we get people to stick around for Oklahoma City’s pick well around the clock has struck midnight?You gotta know I have an idea:Make the thing interactive. As soon as the screen flashes, “The Pick Is In,” you have one minute to text your prediction to 3447274554268 (DGIsBrilliant).Viewer with the most correct selections wins  million. You sleeping in the next day?To quote Kirk Herbstreit (for the one and only time): “I love it.”   #NBA #Draft #Learn #NFL #Draft #Deadspin.com

What the NBA Draft Should Learn From the 2026 NFL Draft | Deadspin.com

The NFL turned its most popular off-season extravaganza into a golf tournament this week.

Maybe they couldn’t hear it, but the silence on our end of the cable hook-up was deafening.

I understand why golf fans want the world’s top players to pick up the pace. There’s only so much a broadcaster can say about a guy’s cool sunglasses on his excruciatingly long walk to a 350-yard drive.

But a professional draft is different, especially when fans are as invested as they are in football. And basketball, for that matter.

Thursday’s telecast of the NFL Draft’s first round had to make Bob Hayes proud. It flew by.

Not coincidentally, it had to go down as a JaMarcus Russell – the worst of all-time, flawed in so many ways.

But there’s good news: The NBA should have learned a whole lot in terms of What Not To Include in the script for its big night in June.

Here are six suggestions.

Say Something

I found it interesting that some day-after critics of ABC’s telecast found it noteworthy that Nick Saban labeled one selection “not really a self-starter.”

Wow. Scathing. Potentially libelous. Shocked he wasn’t dismissed from the panel immediately.

OK, maybe not.

That was the most controversial thing Saban said all night, the only utterance to which fired-up football fans in TV-land screamed back: “Yeah. You tell ‘em, Coach. The guy is fat and out of shape. Been saying that all season.”

That’s why we gathered the gang, slipped on our 2025 Fantasy Football Champs t-shirts and poured the Mexican Coke. We didn’t come to hear “Go Wolverines” and “Go Buckeyes” from Saban’s sidekicks.

A draft inspires debate. Half a team’s fan base has been calling talk radio for weeks demanding their scouting chops go regional. The other half has waited until day-after to let everyone know they heard it here first: Our pick blows.

Yet all we heard on NFL Day 1 was how coachable the kid was and what a great fit he’d be.

THIRTY-TWO TIMES.

Give me …

Ban Cheerleaders

It all starts with the panel. Ernie Johnson is the perfect NBA host.

Then you need book-end blowhards. The Republican and the Democrat, if you will.

Stephen A. Smith is ideal. Informed, well spoken and, most importantly, loud.

Then you need someone equally bull-headed, but ideally from a basketball background. I see him, but it would be bold – Draymond Green the player/analyst.

In between, we only have Johnson … because I’m saving the fourth virtual seat for a real game-breaker. If you thought Green was out there … Stay tuned.

“I Want to Thank …”

The three biggest wastes of time on draft night are:

  • “I wouldn’t be here without my mom.” (Every player interview.)
  • “We’re so proud.” (Every parent interview.)
  • “Can you describe your feelings?” (Every interviewer.)

It reminds me – time and time and time again – of a roving baseball reporter in the stands chatting with a rookie outfielder’s family while a no-hitter is going on.

Can we get back to the action?

No interviews!

“Jeopardy” Can Wait

What’s the rush? We’ve tuned in to welcome (or trash) our new baby. Let’s spend the night together.

Fifteen minutes between picks seems perfectly fine.

There are two aspects of each pick that every fan of that team wants to hear experts dissect: The current state of the team (leading into who would be the ideal addition) and the snap-judgement fit/ramifications of the pick itself in the immediate aftermath of it having been made.

Five minutes of the former and five minutes of the latter might not be enough time. OK, so how about six of each? It’s the best we can do.

Throw in your three minutes of commercials and you have 15 minutes of absolute sports heaven sandwiching each pick. Times 30.

Not eight (down from 10) like the NFL sped us through in its all-important Round 1.

What’s Must-See TV Without a Celebrity?

Sadly I must admit: Yes, you can have too much Stephen A. Smith. So let’s trump his and Draymond’s dueling haymakers with a “wow-inducing” local expert with something of substance to say about each pick.

I’m talking Barack Obama living and dying with his beloved Bulls. Kevin Hart, Peyton Manning, Patrick Mahomes, David Letterman, Tiger Woods, Uma Thurman, Drake, Billy Crystal, Dianna Russini …

You’ve now elevated your telecast to Academy Awards level. And the great thing about these ultimate attention-grabbers – every team has at least one – is they would kill to have their basketball expertise heard. You know, like real fans.

Each joins the debate for his/her team via satellite, shoehorned into the six-minute lead-in and the six-minute critique. Tell me you wouldn’t tune in for that.

It sure beats watching them actually try to play in a celebrity game.

You Make The Call

Thirty teams with 15 minutes between picks. Give me a second … that’s 7 1/2 hours. Yikes.

How in the world can we get people to stick around for Oklahoma City’s pick well around the clock has struck midnight?

You gotta know I have an idea:

Make the thing interactive. As soon as the screen flashes, “The Pick Is In,” you have one minute to text your prediction to 3447274554268 (DGIsBrilliant).

Viewer with the most correct selections wins $1 million. You sleeping in the next day?

To quote Kirk Herbstreit (for the one and only time): “I love it.”

#NBA #Draft #Learn #NFL #Draft #Deadspin.com

The NFL turned its most popular off-season extravaganza into a golf tournament this week.

Maybe they couldn’t hear it, but the silence on our end of the cable hook-up was deafening.

I understand why golf fans want the world’s top players to pick up the pace. There’s only so much a broadcaster can say about a guy’s cool sunglasses on his excruciatingly long walk to a 350-yard drive.

But a professional draft is different, especially when fans are as invested as they are in football. And basketball, for that matter.

Thursday’s telecast of the NFL Draft’s first round had to make Bob Hayes proud. It flew by.

Not coincidentally, it had to go down as a JaMarcus Russell – the worst of all-time, flawed in so many ways.

But there’s good news: The NBA should have learned a whole lot in terms of What Not To Include in the script for its big night in June.

Here are six suggestions.

Say Something

I found it interesting that some day-after critics of ABC’s telecast found it noteworthy that Nick Saban labeled one selection “not really a self-starter.”

Wow. Scathing. Potentially libelous. Shocked he wasn’t dismissed from the panel immediately.

OK, maybe not.

That was the most controversial thing Saban said all night, the only utterance to which fired-up football fans in TV-land screamed back: “Yeah. You tell ‘em, Coach. The guy is fat and out of shape. Been saying that all season.”

That’s why we gathered the gang, slipped on our 2025 Fantasy Football Champs t-shirts and poured the Mexican Coke. We didn’t come to hear “Go Wolverines” and “Go Buckeyes” from Saban’s sidekicks.

A draft inspires debate. Half a team’s fan base has been calling talk radio for weeks demanding their scouting chops go regional. The other half has waited until day-after to let everyone know they heard it here first: Our pick blows.

Yet all we heard on NFL Day 1 was how coachable the kid was and what a great fit he’d be.

THIRTY-TWO TIMES.

Give me …

Ban Cheerleaders

It all starts with the panel. Ernie Johnson is the perfect NBA host.

Then you need book-end blowhards. The Republican and the Democrat, if you will.

Stephen A. Smith is ideal. Informed, well spoken and, most importantly, loud.

Then you need someone equally bull-headed, but ideally from a basketball background. I see him, but it would be bold – Draymond Green the player/analyst.

In between, we only have Johnson … because I’m saving the fourth virtual seat for a real game-breaker. If you thought Green was out there … Stay tuned.

“I Want to Thank …”

The three biggest wastes of time on draft night are:

  • “I wouldn’t be here without my mom.” (Every player interview.)
  • “We’re so proud.” (Every parent interview.)
  • “Can you describe your feelings?” (Every interviewer.)

It reminds me – time and time and time again – of a roving baseball reporter in the stands chatting with a rookie outfielder’s family while a no-hitter is going on.

Can we get back to the action?

No interviews!

“Jeopardy” Can Wait

What’s the rush? We’ve tuned in to welcome (or trash) our new baby. Let’s spend the night together.

Fifteen minutes between picks seems perfectly fine.

There are two aspects of each pick that every fan of that team wants to hear experts dissect: The current state of the team (leading into who would be the ideal addition) and the snap-judgement fit/ramifications of the pick itself in the immediate aftermath of it having been made.

Five minutes of the former and five minutes of the latter might not be enough time. OK, so how about six of each? It’s the best we can do.

Throw in your three minutes of commercials and you have 15 minutes of absolute sports heaven sandwiching each pick. Times 30.

Not eight (down from 10) like the NFL sped us through in its all-important Round 1.

What’s Must-See TV Without a Celebrity?

Sadly I must admit: Yes, you can have too much Stephen A. Smith. So let’s trump his and Draymond’s dueling haymakers with a “wow-inducing” local expert with something of substance to say about each pick.

I’m talking Barack Obama living and dying with his beloved Bulls. Kevin Hart, Peyton Manning, Patrick Mahomes, David Letterman, Tiger Woods, Uma Thurman, Drake, Billy Crystal, Dianna Russini …

You’ve now elevated your telecast to Academy Awards level. And the great thing about these ultimate attention-grabbers – every team has at least one – is they would kill to have their basketball expertise heard. You know, like real fans.

Each joins the debate for his/her team via satellite, shoehorned into the six-minute lead-in and the six-minute critique. Tell me you wouldn’t tune in for that.

It sure beats watching them actually try to play in a celebrity game.

You Make The Call

Thirty teams with 15 minutes between picks. Give me a second … that’s 7 1/2 hours. Yikes.

How in the world can we get people to stick around for Oklahoma City’s pick well around the clock has struck midnight?

You gotta know I have an idea:

Make the thing interactive. As soon as the screen flashes, “The Pick Is In,” you have one minute to text your prediction to 3447274554268 (DGIsBrilliant).

Viewer with the most correct selections wins $1 million. You sleeping in the next day?

To quote Kirk Herbstreit (for the one and only time): “I love it.”

Source link
#NBA #Draft #Learn #NFL #Draft #Deadspin.com

Previous post

From the Archive: The Evolution of the Met Gala, From Society Supper to Global Spectacle

Next post

Palantir Debuts Chic Chore Coat So the World Knows You’re One of the Baddies<img src="https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/04/palatnir-chore-coats-1280x853.jpg" /><br><div> <p>This week, Palantir announced the upcoming release of a new chore coat branded with the company’s logo. The company has been releasing gear since 2024, and this new coat is a great way to tell everyone what you stand for. Specifically, it communicates to everyone in your immediate vicinity that you <a href="https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/palantir-deportation-roundup">support ICE</a> and aren’t a big fan of <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html">civil liberties</a>.</p> <p>Palantir’s head of strategic engagement Eliano A. Younes tweeted the chore coat this week, which he says will be released on <a href="https://x.com/eliano/status/2046585486005748007">April 30</a>.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true"> <p lang="en" dir="ltr">the lightweight Palantir chore coat</p> <p>[04.30.2026 • 0930 AM EST] <a href="https://t.co/9K5fmu3bSs">pic.twitter.com/9K5fmu3bSs</a></p> <p>— Eliano A Younes (@eliano) <a href="https://twitter.com/eliano/status/2046585486005748007?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 21, 2026</a></p></blockquote> <p>X users responded to Younes with the kind of comments that anyone might expect about Palantir, a company aligned with President Donald Trump and the most dystopian elements of our modern surveillance society.</p> <p><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3">“could it be operated remotely ? detonated? listening ? what’s the features list,” one user joked, while another asked if it had “built in surveillance trackers?”</span></p> <p>But Younes seemed genuinely offended by the most obvious jokes any reasonable person might be expected to make of Palantir, a defense contractor that prides itself in helping surveil and kill people <a href="https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/02/palantir-alex-karp-trump-private-prisons-profiteers/">around the world</a>. He responded with “<span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3">here for the shitposting but I need to see better from you. this is unoriginal and not funny,” and “not even remotely funny. try harder.”</span></p> <p>Even Palantir employees seem to be waking up to what the company stands for, according to a recent report from <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/palantir-employees-are-starting-to-wonder-if-theyre-the-bad-guys/">Wired</a>. When the U.S. launched a missile attack against an elementary school in Iran on Feb. 28 that killed about 175 people, mostly children, the employees reportedly started to question whether Palantir’s Maven technology had been used. Employees are also worried about the company’s lucrative <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/01/report-ice-using-palantir-tool-feeds-medicaid-data">contracts with ICE</a>, an organization that has been terrorizing American streets in particularly heinous ways.</p> <p>But Palantir seems intent on pushing out gear that allows like-minded people to wrap themselves in a horrifying, anti-American brand.</p> <p>“We want millions of people wearing Palantir merch around the world,” recently Younes told <a href="https://www.gq.com/story/palantir-tennis-merch">GQ</a>. Younes says he wants Palantir to be a lifestyle brand, telling GQ, “There are people out there wearing Palantir merchandise to signal their alignment with our mission, and that’s exactly what a lifestyle brand is.”</p> <p>That lifestyle, of course, isn’t something that decent people would be proud of. Palantir recently promoted a Reader’s Digest-style version of the book <em><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="r-36ujnk">The Technological Republic</span></span></em>, co-authored by CEO Alex Karp, in a tweet. The book advocates for reinstatement of the draft, says the “<span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="r-b88u0q">postwar neutering</span></span>” of Germany and Japan following the atrocities of World War II was an overcorrection, and criticizes the <a href="https://x.com/PalantirTech/status/2045574398573453312">concept of pluralism</a>.</p> <p>It’s not just the chore coat. The company also sell sweatshirts, t-shirts, and hats, among other items. One t-shirt Palantir sold in 2025 featured an image of Karp along with the word “<a href="https://store.palantir.com/collections/archive/products/karpism-tee">Dominate</a>.” That item is no longer available for purchase.</p> <p>Younes also suggested to GQ that its CEO was important for Palantir as a fashion brand: “A lot of the store’s designs are downstream of Dr. Karp and our chief technology officer Shyam Sankar’s personal style.” Younes wouldn’t say how many units the company is selling, but did claim, “store sales have increased 64% year-over-year and everything we’ve made has sold out, sometimes in minutes.”</p> <p>GQ asked about Palantir’s ICE contracts and the other “controversial” things it’s engaged in with the U.S. military, but Younes insisted the company is “not political,” whatever that’s supposed to  mean.</p> <p>As the Wall Street Journal recently <a href="https://www.wsj.com/tech/silicon-valley-founder-fashion-nvidia-huang-anduril-luckey-musk-tesla-palantir-karp-4d8b9339">pointed out</a>, Palantir is leaning hard into selling the “tech-boss-as-hero ethos,” that’s frankly pretty common in Silicon Valley these days. But even some fans of the company think the merchandising effort is embarrassing.</p> <p>“Unpopular opinion: all these merch posts are so ‘fan boy’ and extra cringe,” one user wrote in the Palantir subreddit about Karp’s <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/PLTR/comments/1nkq4bt/pltr_dominate_shirts_sold_out_wild/">Dominate shirt</a>. “Like the stock or don’t, believe in the company or don’t,…. But the incessant merch posts are weak sauce.”</p> <p>Others are fully bought in, with one user writing, “Definitely a collectors item for me, could be worth something one day.”</p> <p>Younes told GQ that Palantir is working on a tennis collection and something for the <a href="https://america250.org/">America 250</a> celebrations this summer. So if you’re a fan of techno-fascism, keep your eyes peeled. Whatever merch they’ve got planned for the rest of the year could be sold out in no time.</p> </div><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>#Palantir #Debuts #Chic #Chore #Coat #World #Youre #BaddiesPalantir

Iga Swiatek was forced to retire from her Madrid Open clash with Ann Li on Saturday due to illness, sending the American 31st seed into the round of 16 of the WTA 1000 tournament.

A champion in the Spanish capital in 2024, Swiatek rebounded from a set down to level the contest but ended her campaign while trailing 0-3 in the decider.

The Polish six-time Grand Slam champion appeared to be struggling and asked for the doctor after being broken early in the third set.

Following a conversation with the trainers, Swiatek tried to break Li back but, when her opponent held for a 3-0 lead, the fourth seed realised she was unable to continue.

It is Swiatek’s earliest exit in five appearances in Madrid.

Earlier in the day, 15th seed Iva Jovic squandered a lead and fell 3-6, 6-3, 6-2 to Canada’s 24th seed Leylah Fernandez, who will face Li in the last 16.

ALSO READ: Fernandes hopes Portugal wins FIFA World Cup to crown Ronaldo’s international career

Ninth seed Mirra Andreeva of Russia overcame an inspired Dalma Galfi 6-3, 6-2 in a match that was much closer than the scoreline suggested.

The Hungarian qualifier, ranked 117 in the world, broke early in both sets but was unable to maintain her advantage as Andreeva recovered to improve her clay-court record this season to 9-1 and set up a last-16 meeting with another Hungarian, Anna Bondar.

In ATP action, defending champion Casper Ruud raced into the third round with a 6-0, 6-1 demolition of home favourite Jaume Munar in just 65 minutes.

The 12th seed leads the ATP Tour in clay-court wins (133) and titles (12) since the start of the 2020 season and is bidding to become the third man to defend the Madrid crown after Rafael Nadal (2013-14) and Carlos Alcaraz (2022-23).

Second-seeded Alexander Zverev recovered from a “terrible” second set to begin his campaign with a 6-1, 3-6, 6-3 performance against recent Bucharest champion Mariano Navone.

Published on Apr 25, 2026

#Ailing #Swiatek #retires #Madrid #Open">Ailing Swiatek retires in third round of Madrid Open  Iga Swiatek was forced to retire from her Madrid Open clash with Ann Li on Saturday due to illness, sending the American 31st seed into the round of 16 of the WTA 1000 tournament.A champion in the Spanish capital in 2024, Swiatek rebounded from a set down to level the contest but ended her campaign while trailing 0-3 in the decider.The Polish six-time Grand Slam champion appeared to be struggling and asked for the doctor after being broken early in the third set.Following a conversation with the trainers, Swiatek tried to break Li back but, when her opponent held for a 3-0 lead, the fourth seed realised she was unable to continue.It is Swiatek’s earliest exit in five appearances in Madrid.Earlier in the day, 15th seed Iva Jovic squandered a lead and fell 3-6, 6-3, 6-2 to Canada’s 24th seed Leylah Fernandez, who will face Li in the last 16.ALSO READ: Fernandes hopes Portugal wins FIFA World Cup to crown Ronaldo’s international careerNinth seed Mirra Andreeva of Russia overcame an inspired Dalma Galfi 6-3, 6-2 in a match that was much closer than the scoreline suggested.The Hungarian qualifier, ranked 117 in the world, broke early in both sets but was unable to maintain her advantage as Andreeva recovered to improve her clay-court record this season to 9-1 and set up a last-16 meeting with another Hungarian, Anna Bondar.In ATP action, defending champion Casper Ruud raced into the third round with a 6-0, 6-1 demolition of home favourite Jaume Munar in just 65 minutes.The 12th seed leads the ATP Tour in clay-court wins (133) and titles (12) since the start of the 2020 season and is bidding to become the third man to defend the Madrid crown after Rafael Nadal (2013-14) and Carlos Alcaraz (2022-23).Second-seeded Alexander Zverev recovered from a “terrible” second set to begin his campaign with a 6-1, 3-6, 6-3 performance against recent Bucharest champion Mariano Navone.Published on Apr 25, 2026  #Ailing #Swiatek #retires #Madrid #Open

Fernandes hopes Portugal wins FIFA World Cup to crown Ronaldo’s international career

Ninth seed Mirra Andreeva of Russia overcame an inspired Dalma Galfi 6-3, 6-2 in a match that was much closer than the scoreline suggested.

The Hungarian qualifier, ranked 117 in the world, broke early in both sets but was unable to maintain her advantage as Andreeva recovered to improve her clay-court record this season to 9-1 and set up a last-16 meeting with another Hungarian, Anna Bondar.

In ATP action, defending champion Casper Ruud raced into the third round with a 6-0, 6-1 demolition of home favourite Jaume Munar in just 65 minutes.

The 12th seed leads the ATP Tour in clay-court wins (133) and titles (12) since the start of the 2020 season and is bidding to become the third man to defend the Madrid crown after Rafael Nadal (2013-14) and Carlos Alcaraz (2022-23).

Second-seeded Alexander Zverev recovered from a “terrible” second set to begin his campaign with a 6-1, 3-6, 6-3 performance against recent Bucharest champion Mariano Navone.

Published on Apr 25, 2026

#Ailing #Swiatek #retires #Madrid #Open">Ailing Swiatek retires in third round of Madrid Open

Iga Swiatek was forced to retire from her Madrid Open clash with Ann Li on Saturday due to illness, sending the American 31st seed into the round of 16 of the WTA 1000 tournament.

A champion in the Spanish capital in 2024, Swiatek rebounded from a set down to level the contest but ended her campaign while trailing 0-3 in the decider.

The Polish six-time Grand Slam champion appeared to be struggling and asked for the doctor after being broken early in the third set.

Following a conversation with the trainers, Swiatek tried to break Li back but, when her opponent held for a 3-0 lead, the fourth seed realised she was unable to continue.

It is Swiatek’s earliest exit in five appearances in Madrid.

Earlier in the day, 15th seed Iva Jovic squandered a lead and fell 3-6, 6-3, 6-2 to Canada’s 24th seed Leylah Fernandez, who will face Li in the last 16.

ALSO READ: Fernandes hopes Portugal wins FIFA World Cup to crown Ronaldo’s international career

Ninth seed Mirra Andreeva of Russia overcame an inspired Dalma Galfi 6-3, 6-2 in a match that was much closer than the scoreline suggested.

The Hungarian qualifier, ranked 117 in the world, broke early in both sets but was unable to maintain her advantage as Andreeva recovered to improve her clay-court record this season to 9-1 and set up a last-16 meeting with another Hungarian, Anna Bondar.

In ATP action, defending champion Casper Ruud raced into the third round with a 6-0, 6-1 demolition of home favourite Jaume Munar in just 65 minutes.

The 12th seed leads the ATP Tour in clay-court wins (133) and titles (12) since the start of the 2020 season and is bidding to become the third man to defend the Madrid crown after Rafael Nadal (2013-14) and Carlos Alcaraz (2022-23).

Second-seeded Alexander Zverev recovered from a “terrible” second set to begin his campaign with a 6-1, 3-6, 6-3 performance against recent Bucharest champion Mariano Navone.

Published on Apr 25, 2026

#Ailing #Swiatek #retires #Madrid #Open
Deadspin | Iga Swiatek withdraws from Madrid with illness  Mar 19, 2026; Miami Gardens, FL, USA; Iga Swiatek (POL) reacts after missing a shot against Magda Linette (POL) (not pictured) on day three of the 2026 Miami Open at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-Imagn Images   Iga Swiatek withdrew from the Mutua Madrid Open after suffering from an illness in her round-of-32 match against Ann Li on Saturday.  The No. 4 seed Swiatek lost the first set to the No. 31 seed Li but jumped out to a 4-0 lead in the second set, winning 16 of 21 points on the way to winning that set in 39 minutes.  However, the six-time Grand Slam Champion looked unwell throughout and called for a medical timeout while down 2-0 in the deciding third set. She returned to the court after being checked on by doctors but retired after Li held serve.  The exit is the earliest for Swiatek in five appearances in Madrid, where she won the title in 2024.  She beat Daria Snigur in straight sets Thursday but said Saturday she’d been feeling ill for the previous two days.  “I heard there is something going on between players, that the virus is somewhere on site. I’m sure I’ll be fine in a couple of days, but I had zero energy and zero stability and just felt really bad physically, and yesterday even worse,” Swiatek said after Saturday’s match. “I knew that it’s going to be hard, but I still wanted to try.”   Previously untouchable on clay, Swiatek has struggled on the surface more recently.  In 2025, the Polish star failed to defend her Madrid and Italian Open titles and also lost in the French Open semifinals. So far this spring, she has not won more than one match in two clay court tournaments.  “On the court before the tournament I felt like I’m playing great, so actually it’s sad for me that I can’t play, because I was feeling really good with my game, and I was moving forward in the process, so, this was positive,” Swiatek said. “But for me the tournament has just started and I couldn’t even compete today, so it’s disappointing.”  The 7-6 (4), 2-6, 3-0 ret. win over Swiatek is Li’s s second Top 10 win in 12 chances and the highest-ranked win of her career. She will face the No. 24 seed, Canadian Leylah Fernandez, in the Round of 16 on Monday.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Iga #Swiatek #withdraws #Madrid #illnessMar 19, 2026; Miami Gardens, FL, USA; Iga Swiatek (POL) reacts after missing a shot against Magda Linette (POL) (not pictured) on day three of the 2026 Miami Open at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-Imagn Images

Iga Swiatek withdrew from the Mutua Madrid Open after suffering from an illness in her round-of-32 match against Ann Li on Saturday.

The No. 4 seed Swiatek lost the first set to the No. 31 seed Li but jumped out to a 4-0 lead in the second set, winning 16 of 21 points on the way to winning that set in 39 minutes.

However, the six-time Grand Slam Champion looked unwell throughout and called for a medical timeout while down 2-0 in the deciding third set. She returned to the court after being checked on by doctors but retired after Li held serve.

The exit is the earliest for Swiatek in five appearances in Madrid, where she won the title in 2024.

She beat Daria Snigur in straight sets Thursday but said Saturday she’d been feeling ill for the previous two days.


“I heard there is something going on between players, that the virus is somewhere on site. I’m sure I’ll be fine in a couple of days, but I had zero energy and zero stability and just felt really bad physically, and yesterday even worse,” Swiatek said after Saturday’s match. “I knew that it’s going to be hard, but I still wanted to try.”

Previously untouchable on clay, Swiatek has struggled on the surface more recently.

In 2025, the Polish star failed to defend her Madrid and Italian Open titles and also lost in the French Open semifinals. So far this spring, she has not won more than one match in two clay court tournaments.

“On the court before the tournament I felt like I’m playing great, so actually it’s sad for me that I can’t play, because I was feeling really good with my game, and I was moving forward in the process, so, this was positive,” Swiatek said. “But for me the tournament has just started and I couldn’t even compete today, so it’s disappointing.”

The 7-6 (4), 2-6, 3-0 ret. win over Swiatek is Li’s s second Top 10 win in 12 chances and the highest-ranked win of her career. She will face the No. 24 seed, Canadian Leylah Fernandez, in the Round of 16 on Monday.

–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Iga #Swiatek #withdraws #Madrid #illness">Deadspin | Iga Swiatek withdraws from Madrid with illness  Mar 19, 2026; Miami Gardens, FL, USA; Iga Swiatek (POL) reacts after missing a shot against Magda Linette (POL) (not pictured) on day three of the 2026 Miami Open at Hard Rock Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-Imagn Images   Iga Swiatek withdrew from the Mutua Madrid Open after suffering from an illness in her round-of-32 match against Ann Li on Saturday.  The No. 4 seed Swiatek lost the first set to the No. 31 seed Li but jumped out to a 4-0 lead in the second set, winning 16 of 21 points on the way to winning that set in 39 minutes.  However, the six-time Grand Slam Champion looked unwell throughout and called for a medical timeout while down 2-0 in the deciding third set. She returned to the court after being checked on by doctors but retired after Li held serve.  The exit is the earliest for Swiatek in five appearances in Madrid, where she won the title in 2024.  She beat Daria Snigur in straight sets Thursday but said Saturday she’d been feeling ill for the previous two days.  “I heard there is something going on between players, that the virus is somewhere on site. I’m sure I’ll be fine in a couple of days, but I had zero energy and zero stability and just felt really bad physically, and yesterday even worse,” Swiatek said after Saturday’s match. “I knew that it’s going to be hard, but I still wanted to try.”   Previously untouchable on clay, Swiatek has struggled on the surface more recently.  In 2025, the Polish star failed to defend her Madrid and Italian Open titles and also lost in the French Open semifinals. So far this spring, she has not won more than one match in two clay court tournaments.  “On the court before the tournament I felt like I’m playing great, so actually it’s sad for me that I can’t play, because I was feeling really good with my game, and I was moving forward in the process, so, this was positive,” Swiatek said. “But for me the tournament has just started and I couldn’t even compete today, so it’s disappointing.”  The 7-6 (4), 2-6, 3-0 ret. win over Swiatek is Li’s s second Top 10 win in 12 chances and the highest-ranked win of her career. She will face the No. 24 seed, Canadian Leylah Fernandez, in the Round of 16 on Monday.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Iga #Swiatek #withdraws #Madrid #illness

Post Comment