×
What’s Going Wrong for Mumbai Indians In IPL 2026?  A poor start to an IPL season is nothing out of the ordinary for Mumbai Indians. Even at its title-winning best, MI often took its own time to find rhythm.That trend appeared to have changed when MI beat Kolkata Knight Riders in its first game of IPL 2026, breaking a 13-year streak of losing its season opener.However, that proved to be a false dawn, as the five-time champion went on to lose its next four games. Old habits die hard.Even five games into the season, the Hardik Pandya-led side is yet to settle on its ideal playing XII. The batting order has been in constant flux, while the bowling set-up has looked unsettled, resulting in the team using 17 players this season. Only Chennai Super Kings has used more (18). The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                PTI
                            

                            The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                PTI
                                                    Injuries have also played their part. The side was without Hardik against Delhi Capitals and missed Rohit Sharma against Punjab Kings.The imbalance in combination has only been compounded by a lack of contributions.Not a single MI batter features in the top 30 of the run-getters list this season. Openers Ryan Rickelton and Rohit are joint-33rd and are the only ones with more than 120 runs (both 137).The returns from Suryakumar Yadav (106), Hardik (81) and Naman Dhir (109) appear decent only when contrasted with the woeful output from Tilak Varma, who has managed just 43 runs from five innings so far.Despite the absence of a holding figure in the batting unit, MI has scored at a run rate of 10.26, the fourth-best for a team this season.But that scoring rate is completely offset by the team’s generosity with the ball. MI has conceded 11.34 runs per over in IPL 2026. No team in the league’s history has gone at more than 10.28 in a season.Shardul Thakur is the leading wicket-taker for MI in IPL 2026, but his six scalps have come at a very high cost. He has conceded an eye-watering 13.57 runs per over. Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                EMMANUAL YOGINI
                            

                            Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                EMMANUAL YOGINI
                                                    What has truly dragged down MI’s bowling has been Jasprit Bumrah’s surprising lack of penetration. The Indian pacer has gone wicketless in the first five games. He has been the most economical of MI’s bowlers, going at 8.63 runs per over, but this is also his worst economy rate since IPL 2016.Bumrah’s struggles have come to symbolise the crisis MI finds itself in during the early part of IPL 2026.Skipper Hardik acknowledged the gravity of the situation after his side conceded a seven-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings at home.“To be honest, I don’t have much to say. We need to go back and see where we’re lacking – if it’s individuals, groups or planning and work it out. We need to see if we need to make difficult calls or see if we continue and turn things around. Ownership has to be taken,” said Hardik.Once again, MI has painted itself into a tricky corner, with a playoff spot looking increasingly distant. But if there is any team well-versed in rebounding from such situations, it is MI. If Hardik’s words are to provoke a reaction, the defeat to PBKS could yet prove to be a turning point in IPL 2026.Published on Apr 20, 2026  #Whats #Wrong #Mumbai #Indians #IPL

What’s Going Wrong for Mumbai Indians In IPL 2026?

A poor start to an IPL season is nothing out of the ordinary for Mumbai Indians. Even at its title-winning best, MI often took its own time to find rhythm.

That trend appeared to have changed when MI beat Kolkata Knight Riders in its first game of IPL 2026, breaking a 13-year streak of losing its season opener.

However, that proved to be a false dawn, as the five-time champion went on to lose its next four games. Old habits die hard.

Even five games into the season, the Hardik Pandya-led side is yet to settle on its ideal playing XII. The batting order has been in constant flux, while the bowling set-up has looked unsettled, resulting in the team using 17 players this season. Only Chennai Super Kings has used more (18).

What’s Going Wrong for Mumbai Indians In IPL 2026?  A poor start to an IPL season is nothing out of the ordinary for Mumbai Indians. Even at its title-winning best, MI often took its own time to find rhythm.That trend appeared to have changed when MI beat Kolkata Knight Riders in its first game of IPL 2026, breaking a 13-year streak of losing its season opener.However, that proved to be a false dawn, as the five-time champion went on to lose its next four games. Old habits die hard.Even five games into the season, the Hardik Pandya-led side is yet to settle on its ideal playing XII. The batting order has been in constant flux, while the bowling set-up has looked unsettled, resulting in the team using 17 players this season. Only Chennai Super Kings has used more (18). The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                PTI
                            

                            The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                PTI
                                                    Injuries have also played their part. The side was without Hardik against Delhi Capitals and missed Rohit Sharma against Punjab Kings.The imbalance in combination has only been compounded by a lack of contributions.Not a single MI batter features in the top 30 of the run-getters list this season. Openers Ryan Rickelton and Rohit are joint-33rd and are the only ones with more than 120 runs (both 137).The returns from Suryakumar Yadav (106), Hardik (81) and Naman Dhir (109) appear decent only when contrasted with the woeful output from Tilak Varma, who has managed just 43 runs from five innings so far.Despite the absence of a holding figure in the batting unit, MI has scored at a run rate of 10.26, the fourth-best for a team this season.But that scoring rate is completely offset by the team’s generosity with the ball. MI has conceded 11.34 runs per over in IPL 2026. No team in the league’s history has gone at more than 10.28 in a season.Shardul Thakur is the leading wicket-taker for MI in IPL 2026, but his six scalps have come at a very high cost. He has conceded an eye-watering 13.57 runs per over. Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                EMMANUAL YOGINI
                            

                            Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                EMMANUAL YOGINI
                                                    What has truly dragged down MI’s bowling has been Jasprit Bumrah’s surprising lack of penetration. The Indian pacer has gone wicketless in the first five games. He has been the most economical of MI’s bowlers, going at 8.63 runs per over, but this is also his worst economy rate since IPL 2016.Bumrah’s struggles have come to symbolise the crisis MI finds itself in during the early part of IPL 2026.Skipper Hardik acknowledged the gravity of the situation after his side conceded a seven-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings at home.“To be honest, I don’t have much to say. We need to go back and see where we’re lacking – if it’s individuals, groups or planning and work it out. We need to see if we need to make difficult calls or see if we continue and turn things around. Ownership has to be taken,” said Hardik.Once again, MI has painted itself into a tricky corner, with a playoff spot looking increasingly distant. But if there is any team well-versed in rebounding from such situations, it is MI. If Hardik’s words are to provoke a reaction, the defeat to PBKS could yet prove to be a turning point in IPL 2026.Published on Apr 20, 2026  #Whats #Wrong #Mumbai #Indians #IPL

The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians. | Photo Credit: PTI

lightbox-info

The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians. | Photo Credit: PTI

Injuries have also played their part. The side was without Hardik against Delhi Capitals and missed Rohit Sharma against Punjab Kings.

The imbalance in combination has only been compounded by a lack of contributions.

Not a single MI batter features in the top 30 of the run-getters list this season. Openers Ryan Rickelton and Rohit are joint-33rd and are the only ones with more than 120 runs (both 137).

The returns from Suryakumar Yadav (106), Hardik (81) and Naman Dhir (109) appear decent only when contrasted with the woeful output from Tilak Varma, who has managed just 43 runs from five innings so far.

Despite the absence of a holding figure in the batting unit, MI has scored at a run rate of 10.26, the fourth-best for a team this season.

But that scoring rate is completely offset by the team’s generosity with the ball. MI has conceded 11.34 runs per over in IPL 2026. No team in the league’s history has gone at more than 10.28 in a season.

Shardul Thakur is the leading wicket-taker for MI in IPL 2026, but his six scalps have come at a very high cost. He has conceded an eye-watering 13.57 runs per over.

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far. | Photo Credit: EMMANUAL YOGINI

lightbox-info

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far. | Photo Credit: EMMANUAL YOGINI

What has truly dragged down MI’s bowling has been Jasprit Bumrah’s surprising lack of penetration. The Indian pacer has gone wicketless in the first five games. He has been the most economical of MI’s bowlers, going at 8.63 runs per over, but this is also his worst economy rate since IPL 2016.

Bumrah’s struggles have come to symbolise the crisis MI finds itself in during the early part of IPL 2026.

Skipper Hardik acknowledged the gravity of the situation after his side conceded a seven-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings at home.

“To be honest, I don’t have much to say. We need to go back and see where we’re lacking – if it’s individuals, groups or planning and work it out. We need to see if we need to make difficult calls or see if we continue and turn things around. Ownership has to be taken,” said Hardik.

Once again, MI has painted itself into a tricky corner, with a playoff spot looking increasingly distant. But if there is any team well-versed in rebounding from such situations, it is MI. If Hardik’s words are to provoke a reaction, the defeat to PBKS could yet prove to be a turning point in IPL 2026.

Published on Apr 20, 2026

#Whats #Wrong #Mumbai #Indians #IPL

A poor start to an IPL season is nothing out of the ordinary for Mumbai Indians. Even at its title-winning best, MI often took its own time to find rhythm.

That trend appeared to have changed when MI beat Kolkata Knight Riders in its first game of IPL 2026, breaking a 13-year streak of losing its season opener.

However, that proved to be a false dawn, as the five-time champion went on to lose its next four games. Old habits die hard.

Even five games into the season, the Hardik Pandya-led side is yet to settle on its ideal playing XII. The batting order has been in constant flux, while the bowling set-up has looked unsettled, resulting in the team using 17 players this season. Only Chennai Super Kings has used more (18).

The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
| Photo Credit:
PTI

lightbox-info

The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
| Photo Credit:
PTI

Injuries have also played their part. The side was without Hardik against Delhi Capitals and missed Rohit Sharma against Punjab Kings.

The imbalance in combination has only been compounded by a lack of contributions.

Not a single MI batter features in the top 30 of the run-getters list this season. Openers Ryan Rickelton and Rohit are joint-33rd and are the only ones with more than 120 runs (both 137).

The returns from Suryakumar Yadav (106), Hardik (81) and Naman Dhir (109) appear decent only when contrasted with the woeful output from Tilak Varma, who has managed just 43 runs from five innings so far.

Despite the absence of a holding figure in the batting unit, MI has scored at a run rate of 10.26, the fourth-best for a team this season.

But that scoring rate is completely offset by the team’s generosity with the ball. MI has conceded 11.34 runs per over in IPL 2026. No team in the league’s history has gone at more than 10.28 in a season.

Shardul Thakur is the leading wicket-taker for MI in IPL 2026, but his six scalps have come at a very high cost. He has conceded an eye-watering 13.57 runs per over.

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
| Photo Credit:
EMMANUAL YOGINI

lightbox-info

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
| Photo Credit:
EMMANUAL YOGINI

What has truly dragged down MI’s bowling has been Jasprit Bumrah’s surprising lack of penetration. The Indian pacer has gone wicketless in the first five games. He has been the most economical of MI’s bowlers, going at 8.63 runs per over, but this is also his worst economy rate since IPL 2016.

Bumrah’s struggles have come to symbolise the crisis MI finds itself in during the early part of IPL 2026.

Skipper Hardik acknowledged the gravity of the situation after his side conceded a seven-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings at home.

“To be honest, I don’t have much to say. We need to go back and see where we’re lacking – if it’s individuals, groups or planning and work it out. We need to see if we need to make difficult calls or see if we continue and turn things around. Ownership has to be taken,” said Hardik.

Once again, MI has painted itself into a tricky corner, with a playoff spot looking increasingly distant. But if there is any team well-versed in rebounding from such situations, it is MI. If Hardik’s words are to provoke a reaction, the defeat to PBKS could yet prove to be a turning point in IPL 2026.

Published on Apr 20, 2026

Source link
#Whats #Wrong #Mumbai #Indians #IPL

Previous post

Deadspin | Sabres rally past Bruins in 3rd for 1st playoff win since ’11 <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28768784.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28768784.jpg" alt="NHL: Stanley Cup Playoffs-Boston Bruins at Buffalo Sabres" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Apr 19, 2026; Buffalo, New York, USA; Boston Bruins left wing Viktor Arvidsson (71) and Buffalo Sabres defenseman Mattias Samuelsson (23) go after a loose puck during the first period in game one of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs at KeyBank Center. Mandatory Credit: Timothy T. Ludwig-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>Tage Thompson scored two of the four goals by the Buffalo Sabres in the final eight minutes of the third period in a 4-3 comeback win against the visiting Boston Bruins in Game 1 of their best-of-seven Eastern Conference first-round series on Sunday night.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>Mattias Samuelsson and Alex Tuch scored the final two goals and Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen made 17 saves for Buffalo, the Atlantic Division champion that was appearing in its first playoff game in 15 years. Game 2 of the best-of-seven series is Tuesday in Buffalo.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>David Pastrnak and Morgan Geekie each had a goal and two assists, Elias Lindholm also scored and Jeremy Swayman made 34 saves for Boston, the first wild card from the Eastern Conference.</p> </section><section id="section-4"> <p>Thompson cut it to 2-1 at 12:02 of the third when he pulled the puck out from behind the Boston net and pushed it across the goal line before Swayman could slide over.</p> </section><section id="section-5"> <p>Thompson recovered the puck below the goal line and went to the side of the crease before sliding the puck under Swayman’s pads to tie it 2-2 at 15:44.</p> </section><section id="section-6"> <p>Samuelsson then scored with a wrist shot from just above the left hash marks to give the Sabres a 3-2 lead at 16:36.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-7"> <p>Tuch scored into an empty net with 1:12 left to make it 4-2, which came in handy after Pastrnak scored a power-play goal with eight seconds left to cut it to 4-3.</p> </section> <section id="section-8"> <p>The Bruins took a 1-0 lead at 10:52 of the first period.</p> </section><section id="section-9"> <p>Sabres defenseman Rasmus Dahlin blocked a shot by Pastrnak from just above the right circle off a rush, but the puck caromed to Geekie in the slot and he scored with a one-timer.</p> </section><section id="section-10"> <p>Geekie led the Bruins with 39 goals during the regular season.</p> </section><section id="section-11"> <p>The Sabres went on their second power play after Pavel Zacha was called for holding Alex Tuch, but the best scoring chance belonged to Boston forward Sean Kuraly, who stole a drop pass in the Buffalo zone before he was stopped on a breakaway at 1:41 of the second period.</p> </section><section id="section-12"> <p>Luukkonen also stopped Pastrnak on two breakaways during the second period to keep it a one-goal deficit.</p> </section><section id="section-13"> <p>Boston was outshot 13-4 in the second period, however, giving Buffalo a 27-13 edge entering the third, but the Bruins made it 2-0 at 1:08 of the third when Geekie’s shot from the slot hit the right post and the rebound came to Lindholm, who fired it into the net from the right hash marks.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-14"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section> </div> #Deadspin #Sabres #rally #Bruins #3rd #1st #playoff #win

Next post

Deadspin | On 5-game win streak, Cubs aim to add to Phillies’ woes <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28768185.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28768185.jpg" alt="MLB: New York Mets at Chicago Cubs" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Apr 19, 2026; Chicago, Illinois, USA; Chicago Cubs left fielder Michael Conforto (20) hits an RBI double against th New York Mets during the ninth inning at Wrigley Field. Mandatory Credit: Matt Marton-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>A five-game winning streak wasn’t enough to lift the Chicago Cubs out of last place in a tightly packed National League Central.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>But the Cubs will get another chance to torment another NL East team on Monday night, when they continue a homestand against the Philadelphia Phillies in the opener of a four-game series.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>Colin Rea (2-0, 3.63 ERA) is slated to take the mound for the Cubs against Aaron Nola (1-1, 4.03) in a battle of right-handers.</p> </section><section id="section-4"> <p>Both teams continued going in opposite directions while completing a home series Sunday. The Cubs closed out a three-game sweep of the New York Mets with a 2-1, 10-inning win, while the Phillies suffered their fifth consecutive loss as the Atlanta Braves finished a three-game sweep with a 4-2 victory.</p> </section><section id="section-5"> <p>The series is the second in as many weeks between the Phillies and Cubs, whose respective streaks began when Chicago rolled to a 10-4 win last Tuesday.</p> </section><section id="section-6"> <p>That victory continued an offensive awakening for the Cubs, who scored 59 runs in their first 14 games before scoring seven runs apiece while splitting a pair of games with the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Phillies on April 12-13.</p> </section><section id="section-7"> <p>The Cubs scored a combined 23 runs in wins over the Phillies and Mets last Wednesday and Friday before relying on strong pitching and timely hitting Saturday and Sunday. Carson Kelly hit a tiebreaking, pinch-hit three-run homer in Saturday’s 4-1 win before pinch hitter Michael Conforto forced extra innings Sunday with an RBI double in the ninth.</p> </section><section id="section-8"> <p>Pete Crow-Armstrong scored the winning run in the 10th, when he took third on a wild pitch before racing home on Nico Hoerner’s sacrifice fly to hand the skidding Mets their 11th straight loss.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-9"> <p>Chicago is tied for fourth place in the NL Central with the Milwaukee Brewers.</p> </section> <section id="section-10"> <p>“It’s a big swing for us,” Conforto said. “The offense being held to no runs up to that point and our pitchers putting on a performance against a team that’s fighting for their lives. It’s just a big moment.”</p> </section><section id="section-11"> <p>Big moments have been few and far between for the Phillies, who went 2-7 on a nine-game homestand. Only the Mets have a worse record in the NL, but Philadelphia has the worst run differential (minus-38) in the majors.</p> </section><section id="section-12"> <p>The homestand was the worst homestand of nine games or longer for Philadelphia since a 1-8 mark June 12-21, 2009. The 21-game start to the season is the worst for the Phillies since the 2015 team also opened 8-13.</p> </section><section id="section-13"> <p>The Phillies have been outscored 37-9 during their skid. Kyle Schwarber staked Philadelphia to a 2-0 lead with a first-inning homer Sunday, but the hosts put just four runners into scoring position the rest of the way.</p> </section><section id="section-14"> <p>Schwarber was robbed of a potential game-tying hit to end the game when his liner to right with two on was snared on the run by Ronald Acuna Jr. </p> </section><section id="section-15"> <p>“Sure, there’s frustration,” Schwarber said. “I see the guys in here and the way that they’re working. It’s inevitable. At some point, it’s going to change.”</p> </section><section id="section-16"> <p>Rea and Nola opposed each other last Tuesday. Rea earned the win by allowing three runs over six innings of bulk relief as the Cubs began their winning streak. Nola didn’t factor into the decision after giving up three runs over five innings.</p> </section><section id="section-17"> <p>Rea is 2-2 with a 3.32 ERA in nine career games (six starts) against the Phillies, while Nola is 7-2 with a 4.28 ERA in 12 starts against the Cubs.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-18"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section> </div> #Deadspin #5game #win #streak #Cubs #aim #add #Phillies #woes

Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season">NFL starting QBs ranked by analytics before 2026 season  Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.  #NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season

ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season">NFL starting QBs ranked by analytics before 2026 season

Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season

TOSS

Bangladesh has won the toss and has opted to bowl first.

Playing XIs

Bangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon, Towhid Hridoy(c), Yasir Ali, Nurul Hasan(w), Mahedi Hasan, Mohammad Saifuddin, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Nahid Rana

Zimbabwe: Brian Bennett, Tadiwanashe Marumani, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Milton Shumba, Clive Madande(w), Tashinga Musekiwa, Brad Evans, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani

SQUADS

Bangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon(w), Towhid Hridoy(c), Nurul Hasan, Mosaddek Hossain, Mahedi Hasan, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Shoriful Islam, Nahid Rana, Yasir Ali, Mohammad Saifuddin, Rishad Hossain, Abdul Gaffar Saqlain

Zimbabwe: Tadiwanashe Marumani(w), Brian Bennett, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Clive Madande, Brad Evans, Wellington Masakadza, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani, Newman Nyamhuri, Ben Curran, Milton Shumba, Tashinga Musekiwa, Tinotenda Maposa

Published on Jul 15, 2026

#BAN #ZIM #live #score #1st #T20I #Ngarava #removes #openers #Bangladesh">BAN vs ZIM live score, 1st T20I: Ngarava removes openers; Bangladesh 30/2 (4)  TOSSBangladesh has won the toss and has opted to bowl first.Playing XIsBangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon, Towhid Hridoy(c), Yasir Ali, Nurul Hasan(w), Mahedi Hasan, Mohammad Saifuddin, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Nahid RanaZimbabwe: Brian Bennett, Tadiwanashe Marumani, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Milton Shumba, Clive Madande(w), Tashinga Musekiwa, Brad Evans, Richard Ngarava, Blessing MuzarabaniSQUADSBangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon(w), Towhid Hridoy(c), Nurul Hasan, Mosaddek Hossain, Mahedi Hasan, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Shoriful Islam, Nahid Rana, Yasir Ali, Mohammad Saifuddin, Rishad Hossain, Abdul Gaffar SaqlainZimbabwe: Tadiwanashe Marumani(w), Brian Bennett, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Clive Madande, Brad Evans, Wellington Masakadza, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani, Newman Nyamhuri, Ben Curran, Milton Shumba, Tashinga Musekiwa, Tinotenda MaposaPublished on Jul 15, 2026  #BAN #ZIM #live #score #1st #T20I #Ngarava #removes #openers #Bangladesh

Post Comment