×
What’s Going Wrong for Mumbai Indians In IPL 2026?  A poor start to an IPL season is nothing out of the ordinary for Mumbai Indians. Even at its title-winning best, MI often took its own time to find rhythm.That trend appeared to have changed when MI beat Kolkata Knight Riders in its first game of IPL 2026, breaking a 13-year streak of losing its season opener.However, that proved to be a false dawn, as the five-time champion went on to lose its next four games. Old habits die hard.Even five games into the season, the Hardik Pandya-led side is yet to settle on its ideal playing XII. The batting order has been in constant flux, while the bowling set-up has looked unsettled, resulting in the team using 17 players this season. Only Chennai Super Kings has used more (18). The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                PTI
                            

                            The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                PTI
                                                    Injuries have also played their part. The side was without Hardik against Delhi Capitals and missed Rohit Sharma against Punjab Kings.The imbalance in combination has only been compounded by a lack of contributions.Not a single MI batter features in the top 30 of the run-getters list this season. Openers Ryan Rickelton and Rohit are joint-33rd and are the only ones with more than 120 runs (both 137).The returns from Suryakumar Yadav (106), Hardik (81) and Naman Dhir (109) appear decent only when contrasted with the woeful output from Tilak Varma, who has managed just 43 runs from five innings so far.Despite the absence of a holding figure in the batting unit, MI has scored at a run rate of 10.26, the fourth-best for a team this season.But that scoring rate is completely offset by the team’s generosity with the ball. MI has conceded 11.34 runs per over in IPL 2026. No team in the league’s history has gone at more than 10.28 in a season.Shardul Thakur is the leading wicket-taker for MI in IPL 2026, but his six scalps have come at a very high cost. He has conceded an eye-watering 13.57 runs per over. Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                EMMANUAL YOGINI
                            

                            Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                EMMANUAL YOGINI
                                                    What has truly dragged down MI’s bowling has been Jasprit Bumrah’s surprising lack of penetration. The Indian pacer has gone wicketless in the first five games. He has been the most economical of MI’s bowlers, going at 8.63 runs per over, but this is also his worst economy rate since IPL 2016.Bumrah’s struggles have come to symbolise the crisis MI finds itself in during the early part of IPL 2026.Skipper Hardik acknowledged the gravity of the situation after his side conceded a seven-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings at home.“To be honest, I don’t have much to say. We need to go back and see where we’re lacking – if it’s individuals, groups or planning and work it out. We need to see if we need to make difficult calls or see if we continue and turn things around. Ownership has to be taken,” said Hardik.Once again, MI has painted itself into a tricky corner, with a playoff spot looking increasingly distant. But if there is any team well-versed in rebounding from such situations, it is MI. If Hardik’s words are to provoke a reaction, the defeat to PBKS could yet prove to be a turning point in IPL 2026.Published on Apr 20, 2026  #Whats #Wrong #Mumbai #Indians #IPL

What’s Going Wrong for Mumbai Indians In IPL 2026?

A poor start to an IPL season is nothing out of the ordinary for Mumbai Indians. Even at its title-winning best, MI often took its own time to find rhythm.

That trend appeared to have changed when MI beat Kolkata Knight Riders in its first game of IPL 2026, breaking a 13-year streak of losing its season opener.

However, that proved to be a false dawn, as the five-time champion went on to lose its next four games. Old habits die hard.

Even five games into the season, the Hardik Pandya-led side is yet to settle on its ideal playing XII. The batting order has been in constant flux, while the bowling set-up has looked unsettled, resulting in the team using 17 players this season. Only Chennai Super Kings has used more (18).

What’s Going Wrong for Mumbai Indians In IPL 2026?  A poor start to an IPL season is nothing out of the ordinary for Mumbai Indians. Even at its title-winning best, MI often took its own time to find rhythm.That trend appeared to have changed when MI beat Kolkata Knight Riders in its first game of IPL 2026, breaking a 13-year streak of losing its season opener.However, that proved to be a false dawn, as the five-time champion went on to lose its next four games. Old habits die hard.Even five games into the season, the Hardik Pandya-led side is yet to settle on its ideal playing XII. The batting order has been in constant flux, while the bowling set-up has looked unsettled, resulting in the team using 17 players this season. Only Chennai Super Kings has used more (18). The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                PTI
                            

                            The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                PTI
                                                    Injuries have also played their part. The side was without Hardik against Delhi Capitals and missed Rohit Sharma against Punjab Kings.The imbalance in combination has only been compounded by a lack of contributions.Not a single MI batter features in the top 30 of the run-getters list this season. Openers Ryan Rickelton and Rohit are joint-33rd and are the only ones with more than 120 runs (both 137).The returns from Suryakumar Yadav (106), Hardik (81) and Naman Dhir (109) appear decent only when contrasted with the woeful output from Tilak Varma, who has managed just 43 runs from five innings so far.Despite the absence of a holding figure in the batting unit, MI has scored at a run rate of 10.26, the fourth-best for a team this season.But that scoring rate is completely offset by the team’s generosity with the ball. MI has conceded 11.34 runs per over in IPL 2026. No team in the league’s history has gone at more than 10.28 in a season.Shardul Thakur is the leading wicket-taker for MI in IPL 2026, but his six scalps have come at a very high cost. He has conceded an eye-watering 13.57 runs per over. Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                EMMANUAL YOGINI
                            

                            Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
                                                            | Photo Credit: 
                                EMMANUAL YOGINI
                                                    What has truly dragged down MI’s bowling has been Jasprit Bumrah’s surprising lack of penetration. The Indian pacer has gone wicketless in the first five games. He has been the most economical of MI’s bowlers, going at 8.63 runs per over, but this is also his worst economy rate since IPL 2016.Bumrah’s struggles have come to symbolise the crisis MI finds itself in during the early part of IPL 2026.Skipper Hardik acknowledged the gravity of the situation after his side conceded a seven-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings at home.“To be honest, I don’t have much to say. We need to go back and see where we’re lacking – if it’s individuals, groups or planning and work it out. We need to see if we need to make difficult calls or see if we continue and turn things around. Ownership has to be taken,” said Hardik.Once again, MI has painted itself into a tricky corner, with a playoff spot looking increasingly distant. But if there is any team well-versed in rebounding from such situations, it is MI. If Hardik’s words are to provoke a reaction, the defeat to PBKS could yet prove to be a turning point in IPL 2026.Published on Apr 20, 2026  #Whats #Wrong #Mumbai #Indians #IPL

The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians. | Photo Credit: PTI

lightbox-info

The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians. | Photo Credit: PTI

Injuries have also played their part. The side was without Hardik against Delhi Capitals and missed Rohit Sharma against Punjab Kings.

The imbalance in combination has only been compounded by a lack of contributions.

Not a single MI batter features in the top 30 of the run-getters list this season. Openers Ryan Rickelton and Rohit are joint-33rd and are the only ones with more than 120 runs (both 137).

The returns from Suryakumar Yadav (106), Hardik (81) and Naman Dhir (109) appear decent only when contrasted with the woeful output from Tilak Varma, who has managed just 43 runs from five innings so far.

Despite the absence of a holding figure in the batting unit, MI has scored at a run rate of 10.26, the fourth-best for a team this season.

But that scoring rate is completely offset by the team’s generosity with the ball. MI has conceded 11.34 runs per over in IPL 2026. No team in the league’s history has gone at more than 10.28 in a season.

Shardul Thakur is the leading wicket-taker for MI in IPL 2026, but his six scalps have come at a very high cost. He has conceded an eye-watering 13.57 runs per over.

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far. | Photo Credit: EMMANUAL YOGINI

lightbox-info

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far. | Photo Credit: EMMANUAL YOGINI

What has truly dragged down MI’s bowling has been Jasprit Bumrah’s surprising lack of penetration. The Indian pacer has gone wicketless in the first five games. He has been the most economical of MI’s bowlers, going at 8.63 runs per over, but this is also his worst economy rate since IPL 2016.

Bumrah’s struggles have come to symbolise the crisis MI finds itself in during the early part of IPL 2026.

Skipper Hardik acknowledged the gravity of the situation after his side conceded a seven-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings at home.

“To be honest, I don’t have much to say. We need to go back and see where we’re lacking – if it’s individuals, groups or planning and work it out. We need to see if we need to make difficult calls or see if we continue and turn things around. Ownership has to be taken,” said Hardik.

Once again, MI has painted itself into a tricky corner, with a playoff spot looking increasingly distant. But if there is any team well-versed in rebounding from such situations, it is MI. If Hardik’s words are to provoke a reaction, the defeat to PBKS could yet prove to be a turning point in IPL 2026.

Published on Apr 20, 2026

#Whats #Wrong #Mumbai #Indians #IPL

A poor start to an IPL season is nothing out of the ordinary for Mumbai Indians. Even at its title-winning best, MI often took its own time to find rhythm.

That trend appeared to have changed when MI beat Kolkata Knight Riders in its first game of IPL 2026, breaking a 13-year streak of losing its season opener.

However, that proved to be a false dawn, as the five-time champion went on to lose its next four games. Old habits die hard.

Even five games into the season, the Hardik Pandya-led side is yet to settle on its ideal playing XII. The batting order has been in constant flux, while the bowling set-up has looked unsettled, resulting in the team using 17 players this season. Only Chennai Super Kings has used more (18).

The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
| Photo Credit:
PTI

lightbox-info

The injury to Rohit Sharma has been a big blow to Mumbai Indians.
| Photo Credit:
PTI

Injuries have also played their part. The side was without Hardik against Delhi Capitals and missed Rohit Sharma against Punjab Kings.

The imbalance in combination has only been compounded by a lack of contributions.

Not a single MI batter features in the top 30 of the run-getters list this season. Openers Ryan Rickelton and Rohit are joint-33rd and are the only ones with more than 120 runs (both 137).

The returns from Suryakumar Yadav (106), Hardik (81) and Naman Dhir (109) appear decent only when contrasted with the woeful output from Tilak Varma, who has managed just 43 runs from five innings so far.

Despite the absence of a holding figure in the batting unit, MI has scored at a run rate of 10.26, the fourth-best for a team this season.

But that scoring rate is completely offset by the team’s generosity with the ball. MI has conceded 11.34 runs per over in IPL 2026. No team in the league’s history has gone at more than 10.28 in a season.

Shardul Thakur is the leading wicket-taker for MI in IPL 2026, but his six scalps have come at a very high cost. He has conceded an eye-watering 13.57 runs per over.

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
| Photo Credit:
EMMANUAL YOGINI

lightbox-info

Jasprit Bumrah, while economical, has been unable to prise out wickets in this IPL so far.
| Photo Credit:
EMMANUAL YOGINI

What has truly dragged down MI’s bowling has been Jasprit Bumrah’s surprising lack of penetration. The Indian pacer has gone wicketless in the first five games. He has been the most economical of MI’s bowlers, going at 8.63 runs per over, but this is also his worst economy rate since IPL 2016.

Bumrah’s struggles have come to symbolise the crisis MI finds itself in during the early part of IPL 2026.

Skipper Hardik acknowledged the gravity of the situation after his side conceded a seven-wicket defeat to Punjab Kings at home.

“To be honest, I don’t have much to say. We need to go back and see where we’re lacking – if it’s individuals, groups or planning and work it out. We need to see if we need to make difficult calls or see if we continue and turn things around. Ownership has to be taken,” said Hardik.

Once again, MI has painted itself into a tricky corner, with a playoff spot looking increasingly distant. But if there is any team well-versed in rebounding from such situations, it is MI. If Hardik’s words are to provoke a reaction, the defeat to PBKS could yet prove to be a turning point in IPL 2026.

Published on Apr 20, 2026

Source link
#Whats #Wrong #Mumbai #Indians #IPL

Previous post

Deadspin | Sabres rally past Bruins in 3rd for 1st playoff win since ’11 <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28768784.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28768784.jpg" alt="NHL: Stanley Cup Playoffs-Boston Bruins at Buffalo Sabres" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Apr 19, 2026; Buffalo, New York, USA; Boston Bruins left wing Viktor Arvidsson (71) and Buffalo Sabres defenseman Mattias Samuelsson (23) go after a loose puck during the first period in game one of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs at KeyBank Center. Mandatory Credit: Timothy T. Ludwig-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>Tage Thompson scored two of the four goals by the Buffalo Sabres in the final eight minutes of the third period in a 4-3 comeback win against the visiting Boston Bruins in Game 1 of their best-of-seven Eastern Conference first-round series on Sunday night.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>Mattias Samuelsson and Alex Tuch scored the final two goals and Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen made 17 saves for Buffalo, the Atlantic Division champion that was appearing in its first playoff game in 15 years. Game 2 of the best-of-seven series is Tuesday in Buffalo.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>David Pastrnak and Morgan Geekie each had a goal and two assists, Elias Lindholm also scored and Jeremy Swayman made 34 saves for Boston, the first wild card from the Eastern Conference.</p> </section><section id="section-4"> <p>Thompson cut it to 2-1 at 12:02 of the third when he pulled the puck out from behind the Boston net and pushed it across the goal line before Swayman could slide over.</p> </section><section id="section-5"> <p>Thompson recovered the puck below the goal line and went to the side of the crease before sliding the puck under Swayman’s pads to tie it 2-2 at 15:44.</p> </section><section id="section-6"> <p>Samuelsson then scored with a wrist shot from just above the left hash marks to give the Sabres a 3-2 lead at 16:36.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-7"> <p>Tuch scored into an empty net with 1:12 left to make it 4-2, which came in handy after Pastrnak scored a power-play goal with eight seconds left to cut it to 4-3.</p> </section> <section id="section-8"> <p>The Bruins took a 1-0 lead at 10:52 of the first period.</p> </section><section id="section-9"> <p>Sabres defenseman Rasmus Dahlin blocked a shot by Pastrnak from just above the right circle off a rush, but the puck caromed to Geekie in the slot and he scored with a one-timer.</p> </section><section id="section-10"> <p>Geekie led the Bruins with 39 goals during the regular season.</p> </section><section id="section-11"> <p>The Sabres went on their second power play after Pavel Zacha was called for holding Alex Tuch, but the best scoring chance belonged to Boston forward Sean Kuraly, who stole a drop pass in the Buffalo zone before he was stopped on a breakaway at 1:41 of the second period.</p> </section><section id="section-12"> <p>Luukkonen also stopped Pastrnak on two breakaways during the second period to keep it a one-goal deficit.</p> </section><section id="section-13"> <p>Boston was outshot 13-4 in the second period, however, giving Buffalo a 27-13 edge entering the third, but the Bruins made it 2-0 at 1:08 of the third when Geekie’s shot from the slot hit the right post and the rebound came to Lindholm, who fired it into the net from the right hash marks.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-14"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section> </div> #Deadspin #Sabres #rally #Bruins #3rd #1st #playoff #win

Next post

Deadspin | On 5-game win streak, Cubs aim to add to Phillies’ woes <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28768185.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28768185.jpg" alt="MLB: New York Mets at Chicago Cubs" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Apr 19, 2026; Chicago, Illinois, USA; Chicago Cubs left fielder Michael Conforto (20) hits an RBI double against th New York Mets during the ninth inning at Wrigley Field. Mandatory Credit: Matt Marton-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>A five-game winning streak wasn’t enough to lift the Chicago Cubs out of last place in a tightly packed National League Central.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>But the Cubs will get another chance to torment another NL East team on Monday night, when they continue a homestand against the Philadelphia Phillies in the opener of a four-game series.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>Colin Rea (2-0, 3.63 ERA) is slated to take the mound for the Cubs against Aaron Nola (1-1, 4.03) in a battle of right-handers.</p> </section><section id="section-4"> <p>Both teams continued going in opposite directions while completing a home series Sunday. The Cubs closed out a three-game sweep of the New York Mets with a 2-1, 10-inning win, while the Phillies suffered their fifth consecutive loss as the Atlanta Braves finished a three-game sweep with a 4-2 victory.</p> </section><section id="section-5"> <p>The series is the second in as many weeks between the Phillies and Cubs, whose respective streaks began when Chicago rolled to a 10-4 win last Tuesday.</p> </section><section id="section-6"> <p>That victory continued an offensive awakening for the Cubs, who scored 59 runs in their first 14 games before scoring seven runs apiece while splitting a pair of games with the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Phillies on April 12-13.</p> </section><section id="section-7"> <p>The Cubs scored a combined 23 runs in wins over the Phillies and Mets last Wednesday and Friday before relying on strong pitching and timely hitting Saturday and Sunday. Carson Kelly hit a tiebreaking, pinch-hit three-run homer in Saturday’s 4-1 win before pinch hitter Michael Conforto forced extra innings Sunday with an RBI double in the ninth.</p> </section><section id="section-8"> <p>Pete Crow-Armstrong scored the winning run in the 10th, when he took third on a wild pitch before racing home on Nico Hoerner’s sacrifice fly to hand the skidding Mets their 11th straight loss.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-9"> <p>Chicago is tied for fourth place in the NL Central with the Milwaukee Brewers.</p> </section> <section id="section-10"> <p>“It’s a big swing for us,” Conforto said. “The offense being held to no runs up to that point and our pitchers putting on a performance against a team that’s fighting for their lives. It’s just a big moment.”</p> </section><section id="section-11"> <p>Big moments have been few and far between for the Phillies, who went 2-7 on a nine-game homestand. Only the Mets have a worse record in the NL, but Philadelphia has the worst run differential (minus-38) in the majors.</p> </section><section id="section-12"> <p>The homestand was the worst homestand of nine games or longer for Philadelphia since a 1-8 mark June 12-21, 2009. The 21-game start to the season is the worst for the Phillies since the 2015 team also opened 8-13.</p> </section><section id="section-13"> <p>The Phillies have been outscored 37-9 during their skid. Kyle Schwarber staked Philadelphia to a 2-0 lead with a first-inning homer Sunday, but the hosts put just four runners into scoring position the rest of the way.</p> </section><section id="section-14"> <p>Schwarber was robbed of a potential game-tying hit to end the game when his liner to right with two on was snared on the run by Ronald Acuna Jr. </p> </section><section id="section-15"> <p>“Sure, there’s frustration,” Schwarber said. “I see the guys in here and the way that they’re working. It’s inevitable. At some point, it’s going to change.”</p> </section><section id="section-16"> <p>Rea and Nola opposed each other last Tuesday. Rea earned the win by allowing three runs over six innings of bulk relief as the Cubs began their winning streak. Nola didn’t factor into the decision after giving up three runs over five innings.</p> </section><section id="section-17"> <p>Rea is 2-2 with a 3.32 ERA in nine career games (six starts) against the Phillies, while Nola is 7-2 with a 4.28 ERA in 12 starts against the Cubs.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-18"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section> </div> #Deadspin #5game #win #streak #Cubs #aim #add #Phillies #woes

“Yeah, it’s pretty simple. I win. Google me.”

With those eight words, declared minutes into his first press conference as the new head coach at Indiana, Curt Cignetti announced his vision for the school’s football program, which had languished at the bottom of the Big Ten standings for years. It became a viral sensation, with many wondering if Cignetti could back up that declaration.

After leading the Hoosiers to the College Football Playoff during the 2024 season, Cignetti took Indiana a step further last year, guiding the school to its first national championship, and helping Fernando Mendoza become the first Heisman Trophy winner in Indiana history.

So just what, if anything, can Cignetti and the Hoosiers do for an encore?

To answer that question, we might need to look back for a minute.

Cignetti’s college football journey began in Morgantown, as a backup quarterback for West Virginia. His father was the head coach for the Mountaineers from 1976 through 1979, and after graduating from Morgantown High School in 1979, he enrolled at West Virginia.

And he was buried on the depth chart behind Oliver Luck and Jeff Hostetler. Cignetti appeared in one game during his time on campus, with one rushing attempt against Virginia during the 1981 season.

After graduating, he immediately moved into coaching, taking a role on the staff at Pittsburgh as a graduate assistant. Cignetti began working his way through the coaching ranks on the offensive side of the ball, ultimately landing on the coaching staff at Alabama, during Nick Saban’s first season in Tuscaloosa, as the team’s wide receivers coach and recruiting coordinator.

During his time at Alabama — stretching from 2007 through 2010 — the Crimson Tide won a national title in 2009, and won 29 consecutive games. Cignetti was credited with helping recruit and develop players such as Mark Ingram II, Dont’a Hightower, and Julio Jones, who Cignetti also coached as his WR coach. The 2008 Alabama recruiting class included several future first-round picks (Hightower, Jones, Ingram, Marcell Dareus, and Mark Barron among them).

But Cignetti had an eye on taking a head coaching job, and was a finalist for the Kent State position, Saban’s alma mater, at the end of the 2010 season. The gig went to Darrell Hazell, and Cignetti turned his attention elsewhere.

Indiana University of Pennsylvania, a Division II program where his father, Frank, won 14 conference titles over two decades.

Saban warned him against taking the job — “you can get lost down there” he said — but Cignetti went anyway.

And started a head coaching career that has yet to end with a losing season.

“I woke up many mornings like, ‘What did I do?’” Cignetti admitted while looking back in 2024. “But we got things rolling.”

After six seasons at IUP, including three trips to the Division II playoffs, Cignetti made his next move, taking the job at Elon. In two years coaching the Phoenix, he led the school to a combined 14-9 record, and two consecutive spots in the FCS playoffs. Then in 2019 he moved within the Colonial Athletic Association, taking the job at James Madison.

In his first three years in Harrisonburg, he led the Dukes to the FBS playoffs all three seasons, including a loss in the title game in 2019 and losses in the semifinals in both 2020 and 2021. Then JMU moved to the Sun Belt Conference for 2022, and again the winning continued. The Dukes finished 8-3 in their first season in the FCS, and improved to 11-1 in 2023, securing a spot in the Armed Forces Bowl.

That’s when Indiana came calling.

When Cignetti arrived in Bloomington, he inherited a team that was coming off a 3-9 record, and had endured three consecutive losing seasons. Indiana went 9-27 in the three years before Cignetti was hired. But as you might expect from Cignetti having seen him — and his resume — he did not intend to start losing in 2024.

“There was sort of a dark cloud lingering over the football program here,” Cignetti said. “A lot of people had given up on it, to be honest with you. That sort of attitude permeated people outside the university, too. I could sense it talking to the media. It was my first day here. I could just feel it and I didn’t like it. I wasn’t going to have any of it.”

Cignetti relied heavily on the transfer portal for his first year in the Big Ten, including 13 players who followed him from James Madison. That list of transfers also included quarterback Kurtis Rourke, who joined Indiana from Ohio.

As Rourke pointed out, it was all part of Cignetti’s plan to transform the culture overnight.

“He started to weed out who was going to help or hurt the team,” Rourke said. “He didn’t care about feelings. He wanted to set a tone and develop a culture. He earned a lot of respect from us.”

Part of that culture shift rested in how the transfers viewed themselves, and mirrored Cignetti’s own path to a Big Ten program. 21 of the incoming transfers for that first season came from either FCS schools or Group of 5 teams, so much so that the group gave themselves the nickname the “Group of Five All-Stars.” Said linebacker Aiden Fisher in 2024, ”[t]hey said we had too many Group of Five players. We’ve put that in the back of our mind. We remember it.

“We’ve all got that edge,” Fisher added. ‘I’ve always deserved to be here in the spotlight.’”

The same could be said for their coach.

“It took me a while, right?” Cignetti described in 2024. “I had to take the path less traveled to get to where I am. A little something to prove.”

Indiana reached the College Football Playoff in that first season, losing just one game in the regular season, at Ohio State. But with Rourke playing on a torn ACL that he was managing the entire season, Indiana struggled in the First Round game against Notre Dame, bowing out by a final score of 27-17.

As for last season? You know how that ended, with Cignetti holding the National Championship trophy aloft, celebrating an undefeated season, and seeing another transfer quarterback, Fernando Mendoza, become the school’s first Heisman Trophy winner and come off the board as the first-overall selection in the NFL Draft.

But the days of celebrating are over, and it is time to get back to work for Cignetti and company.

“Obviously, a lot of people on the outside are still celebrating our success, and maybe the administration and people at the university, but in the building you flip the page,” said Cignetti to Athlon Sports in the outlet’s season preview magazine. “I think we’ve done a good job of that, I really do. There’s a lot of work to be done. Everybody’s 0-0 right now. All the new guys that are out there have done some good things and some not-so-good things, and usually they have a great summer, and they’re a different guy in fall camp and during the season. We’re counting on them being on the same trajectory as the other ones, but I don’t notice anybody resting on their laurels.”

As for those new faces, Cignetti again dipped into the transfer portal to address needs on both sides of the football. With both Omar Cooper Jr. and Elijah Sarratt off to the NFL, Indiana added Nick Marsh from Michigan State, and he’ll line up across from returning starter Charlie Becker.

Cignetti talked about Marsh at the Big Ten Media Days last month.

“I think Nick Marsh is a proven two-year player at wide receiver, very productive. I think you’re probably talking about the golden shoes the first day of practice. We don’t do that where I coach. He got the message, and he’s been great. He had a great summer, and I’m expecting big things from him,” said the Indiana coach.

Outside of Marsh, Cignetti pointed to a pair of transfers from Kansas State as well as running back Turbo Richard as some of the other transfers that has stood out so far.

“The two Kansas State guys, the D-Ends [Tobi Osunsamni and Chiddi Obiazor], I’ve noticed them really starting to take a step. Turbo is very consistent at running back. Joe Brunner [an offensive guard] from Wisconsin. The safety from Wisconsin, [Preston] Zachman, is making nice progress,” said Cignetti to Athlon Sports.

But the biggest transfer is the one tasked with replacing Mendoza. That would be Josh Hoover, who joins the Hoosiers after two years as a starter at TCU.

“He’s a quick thinker who has played a lot of football,” described Cignetti to Athlon Sports. “He moves better than Rourke, but Rourke has some natural quarterback instincts that Josh has, too. Fernando, he’s six-foot-five, could really move. We’ve always tilted more towards the run in terms of the run-pass ratio, although in competitive situations last year, we’re about 50-50.

“Whereas where [Hoover] came from, they’re throwing the ball about 60% of the time. It’ll be a lot different for him, more advantageous. He did turn the ball over at TCU, so we’re going to have to do a great job of protecting the ball.”

At the Big Ten Media Days, Cignetti was asked for a similarity between Hoover, and the QB he is replacing.

Cignetti started with a quip, as you might expect.

“They both played quarterback, they were both starting quarterbacks where they came from,” began the head coach.

“Josh Hoover has won a lot of football games, thrown for a lot of yards, thrown a lot of touchdown passes. He has an innate ability to play the position of quarterback, kind of a natural passer, very accurate, processes very quickly.

“I think the things we’ll ask him to do are different than the things TCU asked him to do. We’re not going to put the ball in his hand and say go win the game and outscore people. We’re going to give him a run game, a defense, and special teams and every once in a while on third down a punch-positive play.”

Cignetti closed his remarks on Hoover by outlining some expectations.

“I’m really anxious to see Josh and the progress he’s made in practice starting on Wednesday and fall camp. All the one-year quarterbacks have followed the same line, and I expect him to, as well.”

As for what to expect from Cignetti and the Hoosiers this season, the new standard is, well, the standard.

“I think we have a lot of nice pieces. I think we excel at development and creating the intangibles, and once we get closer to the season as a staff, it’s extremely beneficial. The staff continuity that I have had, that President Whitten and Scott Dolson make possible, we’re on the same page. They know the blueprint, the process, the plan, okay,” said Cignetti at Big Ten Media Days.

“What it really does, to be honest with you, and we’re still trying to get better, we’re trying to improve the way we do things, is those down times can really be down times for the coaches, which they like their quality of life with me, which I think the players do, too, with the way we practice.

“All I can say is, like, going into this season, I know I’m going to get asked some questions. We’re very process-driven. Our focus is on the things you have to do in the here and now to improve as much as possible. To improve as much as possible today. Those types of things. We don’t talk about product, results. We don’t talk about championships, playoffs, National Championships, those sorts of things, okay.

“I’m a firm believer in our blueprint. Our Monday morning meeting will be very similar to what it was eight years ago. It’ll be about an hour long. There’s certain things we’ll do in there, there’s certain things I’ll say in the team meeting Tuesday night that I said eight years ago. It’s not word for word, but it’s pretty damn close.

“The way we practice, pretty similar to what we did eight years ago. We have a way of doing things. We’ve got guys that have been together, and all we do is win.”

Do not expect any excuses.

“The Big Ten is the best league in football, and a lot of really good football teams it’s hard to win on the road, very physical football teams, very well-coached. It definitely prepares you for the playoffs,” said Cignetti as he concluded his remarks at Big Ten Media Days.

“There’s no doubt about it, the numbers speak for themselves.

“We don’t run a hype machine up here in the Midwest. We believe everything is earned, not given. When we fall short, we say: We fell short. We don’t cry a river, whine and complain. That’s why we’re the best.”

Of course, Cignetti has not seen a losing season yet as a head coach.

Hard to expect him to start now.

#Indiana #Curt #Cignetti #encore">What can Indiana and Curt Cignetti do for an encore?  “Yeah, it’s pretty simple. I win. Google me.”With those eight words, declared minutes into his first press conference as the new head coach at Indiana, Curt Cignetti announced his vision for the school’s football program, which had languished at the bottom of the Big Ten standings for years. It became a viral sensation, with many wondering if Cignetti could back up that declaration.After leading the Hoosiers to the College Football Playoff during the 2024 season, Cignetti took Indiana a step further last year, guiding the school to its first national championship, and helping Fernando Mendoza become the first Heisman Trophy winner in Indiana history.So just what, if anything, can Cignetti and the Hoosiers do for an encore?To answer that question, we might need to look back for a minute.Cignetti’s college football journey began in Morgantown, as a backup quarterback for West Virginia. His father was the head coach for the Mountaineers from 1976 through 1979, and after graduating from Morgantown High School in 1979, he enrolled at West Virginia.And he was buried on the depth chart behind Oliver Luck and Jeff Hostetler. Cignetti appeared in one game during his time on campus, with one rushing attempt against Virginia during the 1981 season.After graduating, he immediately moved into coaching, taking a role on the staff at Pittsburgh as a graduate assistant. Cignetti began working his way through the coaching ranks on the offensive side of the ball, ultimately landing on the coaching staff at Alabama, during Nick Saban’s first season in Tuscaloosa, as the team’s wide receivers coach and recruiting coordinator.During his time at Alabama — stretching from 2007 through 2010 — the Crimson Tide won a national title in 2009, and won 29 consecutive games. Cignetti was credited with helping recruit and develop players such as Mark Ingram II, Dont’a Hightower, and Julio Jones, who Cignetti also coached as his WR coach. The 2008 Alabama recruiting class included several future first-round picks (Hightower, Jones, Ingram, Marcell Dareus, and Mark Barron among them).But Cignetti had an eye on taking a head coaching job, and was a finalist for the Kent State position, Saban’s alma mater, at the end of the 2010 season. The gig went to Darrell Hazell, and Cignetti turned his attention elsewhere.Indiana University of Pennsylvania, a Division II program where his father, Frank, won 14 conference titles over two decades.Saban warned him against taking the job — “you can get lost down there” he said — but Cignetti went anyway.And started a head coaching career that has yet to end with a losing season.“I woke up many mornings like, ‘What did I do?’” Cignetti admitted while looking back in 2024. “But we got things rolling.”After six seasons at IUP, including three trips to the Division II playoffs, Cignetti made his next move, taking the job at Elon. In two years coaching the Phoenix, he led the school to a combined 14-9 record, and two consecutive spots in the FCS playoffs. Then in 2019 he moved within the Colonial Athletic Association, taking the job at James Madison.In his first three years in Harrisonburg, he led the Dukes to the FBS playoffs all three seasons, including a loss in the title game in 2019 and losses in the semifinals in both 2020 and 2021. Then JMU moved to the Sun Belt Conference for 2022, and again the winning continued. The Dukes finished 8-3 in their first season in the FCS, and improved to 11-1 in 2023, securing a spot in the Armed Forces Bowl.That’s when Indiana came calling.When Cignetti arrived in Bloomington, he inherited a team that was coming off a 3-9 record, and had endured three consecutive losing seasons. Indiana went 9-27 in the three years before Cignetti was hired. But as you might expect from Cignetti having seen him — and his resume — he did not intend to start losing in 2024.“There was sort of a dark cloud lingering over the football program here,” Cignetti said. “A lot of people had given up on it, to be honest with you. That sort of attitude permeated people outside the university, too. I could sense it talking to the media. It was my first day here. I could just feel it and I didn’t like it. I wasn’t going to have any of it.”Cignetti relied heavily on the transfer portal for his first year in the Big Ten, including 13 players who followed him from James Madison. That list of transfers also included quarterback Kurtis Rourke, who joined Indiana from Ohio.As Rourke pointed out, it was all part of Cignetti’s plan to transform the culture overnight.“He started to weed out who was going to help or hurt the team,” Rourke said. “He didn’t care about feelings. He wanted to set a tone and develop a culture. He earned a lot of respect from us.”Part of that culture shift rested in how the transfers viewed themselves, and mirrored Cignetti’s own path to a Big Ten program. 21 of the incoming transfers for that first season came from either FCS schools or Group of 5 teams, so much so that the group gave themselves the nickname the “Group of Five All-Stars.” Said linebacker Aiden Fisher in 2024, ”[t]hey said we had too many Group of Five players. We’ve put that in the back of our mind. We remember it.“We’ve all got that edge,” Fisher added. ‘I’ve always deserved to be here in the spotlight.’”The same could be said for their coach.“It took me a while, right?” Cignetti described in 2024. “I had to take the path less traveled to get to where I am. A little something to prove.”Indiana reached the College Football Playoff in that first season, losing just one game in the regular season, at Ohio State. But with Rourke playing on a torn ACL that he was managing the entire season, Indiana struggled in the First Round game against Notre Dame, bowing out by a final score of 27-17.As for last season? You know how that ended, with Cignetti holding the National Championship trophy aloft, celebrating an undefeated season, and seeing another transfer quarterback, Fernando Mendoza, become the school’s first Heisman Trophy winner and come off the board as the first-overall selection in the NFL Draft.But the days of celebrating are over, and it is time to get back to work for Cignetti and company.“Obviously, a lot of people on the outside are still celebrating our success, and maybe the administration and people at the university, but in the building you flip the page,” said Cignetti to Athlon Sports in the outlet’s season preview magazine. “I think we’ve done a good job of that, I really do. There’s a lot of work to be done. Everybody’s 0-0 right now. All the new guys that are out there have done some good things and some not-so-good things, and usually they have a great summer, and they’re a different guy in fall camp and during the season. We’re counting on them being on the same trajectory as the other ones, but I don’t notice anybody resting on their laurels.”As for those new faces, Cignetti again dipped into the transfer portal to address needs on both sides of the football. With both Omar Cooper Jr. and Elijah Sarratt off to the NFL, Indiana added Nick Marsh from Michigan State, and he’ll line up across from returning starter Charlie Becker.Cignetti talked about Marsh at the Big Ten Media Days last month.“I think Nick Marsh is a proven two-year player at wide receiver, very productive. I think you’re probably talking about the golden shoes the first day of practice. We don’t do that where I coach. He got the message, and he’s been great. He had a great summer, and I’m expecting big things from him,” said the Indiana coach.Outside of Marsh, Cignetti pointed to a pair of transfers from Kansas State as well as running back Turbo Richard as some of the other transfers that has stood out so far.“The two Kansas State guys, the D-Ends [Tobi Osunsamni and Chiddi Obiazor], I’ve noticed them really starting to take a step. Turbo is very consistent at running back. Joe Brunner [an offensive guard] from Wisconsin. The safety from Wisconsin, [Preston] Zachman, is making nice progress,” said Cignetti to Athlon Sports.But the biggest transfer is the one tasked with replacing Mendoza. That would be Josh Hoover, who joins the Hoosiers after two years as a starter at TCU.“He’s a quick thinker who has played a lot of football,” described Cignetti to Athlon Sports. “He moves better than Rourke, but Rourke has some natural quarterback instincts that Josh has, too. Fernando, he’s six-foot-five, could really move. We’ve always tilted more towards the run in terms of the run-pass ratio, although in competitive situations last year, we’re about 50-50.“Whereas where [Hoover] came from, they’re throwing the ball about 60% of the time. It’ll be a lot different for him, more advantageous. He did turn the ball over at TCU, so we’re going to have to do a great job of protecting the ball.”At the Big Ten Media Days, Cignetti was asked for a similarity between Hoover, and the QB he is replacing.Cignetti started with a quip, as you might expect.“They both played quarterback, they were both starting quarterbacks where they came from,” began the head coach.“Josh Hoover has won a lot of football games, thrown for a lot of yards, thrown a lot of touchdown passes. He has an innate ability to play the position of quarterback, kind of a natural passer, very accurate, processes very quickly.“I think the things we’ll ask him to do are different than the things TCU asked him to do. We’re not going to put the ball in his hand and say go win the game and outscore people. We’re going to give him a run game, a defense, and special teams and every once in a while on third down a punch-positive play.”Cignetti closed his remarks on Hoover by outlining some expectations.“I’m really anxious to see Josh and the progress he’s made in practice starting on Wednesday and fall camp. All the one-year quarterbacks have followed the same line, and I expect him to, as well.”As for what to expect from Cignetti and the Hoosiers this season, the new standard is, well, the standard.“I think we have a lot of nice pieces. I think we excel at development and creating the intangibles, and once we get closer to the season as a staff, it’s extremely beneficial. The staff continuity that I have had, that President Whitten and Scott Dolson make possible, we’re on the same page. They know the blueprint, the process, the plan, okay,” said Cignetti at Big Ten Media Days.“What it really does, to be honest with you, and we’re still trying to get better, we’re trying to improve the way we do things, is those down times can really be down times for the coaches, which they like their quality of life with me, which I think the players do, too, with the way we practice.“All I can say is, like, going into this season, I know I’m going to get asked some questions. We’re very process-driven. Our focus is on the things you have to do in the here and now to improve as much as possible. To improve as much as possible today. Those types of things. We don’t talk about product, results. We don’t talk about championships, playoffs, National Championships, those sorts of things, okay.“I’m a firm believer in our blueprint. Our Monday morning meeting will be very similar to what it was eight years ago. It’ll be about an hour long. There’s certain things we’ll do in there, there’s certain things I’ll say in the team meeting Tuesday night that I said eight years ago. It’s not word for word, but it’s pretty damn close.“The way we practice, pretty similar to what we did eight years ago. We have a way of doing things. We’ve got guys that have been together, and all we do is win.”Do not expect any excuses.“The Big Ten is the best league in football, and a lot of really good football teams it’s hard to win on the road, very physical football teams, very well-coached. It definitely prepares you for the playoffs,” said Cignetti as he concluded his remarks at Big Ten Media Days.“There’s no doubt about it, the numbers speak for themselves.“We don’t run a hype machine up here in the Midwest. We believe everything is earned, not given. When we fall short, we say: We fell short. We don’t cry a river, whine and complain. That’s why we’re the best.”Of course, Cignetti has not seen a losing season yet as a head coach.Hard to expect him to start now.  #Indiana #Curt #Cignetti #encore

those eight words, declared minutes into his first press conference as the new head coach at Indiana, Curt Cignetti announced his vision for the school’s football program, which had languished at the bottom of the Big Ten standings for years. It became a viral sensation, with many wondering if Cignetti could back up that declaration.

After leading the Hoosiers to the College Football Playoff during the 2024 season, Cignetti took Indiana a step further last year, guiding the school to its first national championship, and helping Fernando Mendoza become the first Heisman Trophy winner in Indiana history.

So just what, if anything, can Cignetti and the Hoosiers do for an encore?

To answer that question, we might need to look back for a minute.

Cignetti’s college football journey began in Morgantown, as a backup quarterback for West Virginia. His father was the head coach for the Mountaineers from 1976 through 1979, and after graduating from Morgantown High School in 1979, he enrolled at West Virginia.

And he was buried on the depth chart behind Oliver Luck and Jeff Hostetler. Cignetti appeared in one game during his time on campus, with one rushing attempt against Virginia during the 1981 season.

After graduating, he immediately moved into coaching, taking a role on the staff at Pittsburgh as a graduate assistant. Cignetti began working his way through the coaching ranks on the offensive side of the ball, ultimately landing on the coaching staff at Alabama, during Nick Saban’s first season in Tuscaloosa, as the team’s wide receivers coach and recruiting coordinator.

During his time at Alabama — stretching from 2007 through 2010 — the Crimson Tide won a national title in 2009, and won 29 consecutive games. Cignetti was credited with helping recruit and develop players such as Mark Ingram II, Dont’a Hightower, and Julio Jones, who Cignetti also coached as his WR coach. The 2008 Alabama recruiting class included several future first-round picks (Hightower, Jones, Ingram, Marcell Dareus, and Mark Barron among them).

But Cignetti had an eye on taking a head coaching job, and was a finalist for the Kent State position, Saban’s alma mater, at the end of the 2010 season. The gig went to Darrell Hazell, and Cignetti turned his attention elsewhere.

Indiana University of Pennsylvania, a Division II program where his father, Frank, won 14 conference titles over two decades.

Saban warned him against taking the job — “you can get lost down there” he said — but Cignetti went anyway.

And started a head coaching career that has yet to end with a losing season.

“I woke up many mornings like, ‘What did I do?’” Cignetti admitted while looking back in 2024. “But we got things rolling.”

After six seasons at IUP, including three trips to the Division II playoffs, Cignetti made his next move, taking the job at Elon. In two years coaching the Phoenix, he led the school to a combined 14-9 record, and two consecutive spots in the FCS playoffs. Then in 2019 he moved within the Colonial Athletic Association, taking the job at James Madison.

In his first three years in Harrisonburg, he led the Dukes to the FBS playoffs all three seasons, including a loss in the title game in 2019 and losses in the semifinals in both 2020 and 2021. Then JMU moved to the Sun Belt Conference for 2022, and again the winning continued. The Dukes finished 8-3 in their first season in the FCS, and improved to 11-1 in 2023, securing a spot in the Armed Forces Bowl.

That’s when Indiana came calling.

When Cignetti arrived in Bloomington, he inherited a team that was coming off a 3-9 record, and had endured three consecutive losing seasons. Indiana went 9-27 in the three years before Cignetti was hired. But as you might expect from Cignetti having seen him — and his resume — he did not intend to start losing in 2024.

“There was sort of a dark cloud lingering over the football program here,” Cignetti said. “A lot of people had given up on it, to be honest with you. That sort of attitude permeated people outside the university, too. I could sense it talking to the media. It was my first day here. I could just feel it and I didn’t like it. I wasn’t going to have any of it.”

Cignetti relied heavily on the transfer portal for his first year in the Big Ten, including 13 players who followed him from James Madison. That list of transfers also included quarterback Kurtis Rourke, who joined Indiana from Ohio.

As Rourke pointed out, it was all part of Cignetti’s plan to transform the culture overnight.

“He started to weed out who was going to help or hurt the team,” Rourke said. “He didn’t care about feelings. He wanted to set a tone and develop a culture. He earned a lot of respect from us.”

Part of that culture shift rested in how the transfers viewed themselves, and mirrored Cignetti’s own path to a Big Ten program. 21 of the incoming transfers for that first season came from either FCS schools or Group of 5 teams, so much so that the group gave themselves the nickname the “Group of Five All-Stars.” Said linebacker Aiden Fisher in 2024, ”[t]hey said we had too many Group of Five players. We’ve put that in the back of our mind. We remember it.

“We’ve all got that edge,” Fisher added. ‘I’ve always deserved to be here in the spotlight.’”

The same could be said for their coach.

“It took me a while, right?” Cignetti described in 2024. “I had to take the path less traveled to get to where I am. A little something to prove.”

Indiana reached the College Football Playoff in that first season, losing just one game in the regular season, at Ohio State. But with Rourke playing on a torn ACL that he was managing the entire season, Indiana struggled in the First Round game against Notre Dame, bowing out by a final score of 27-17.

As for last season? You know how that ended, with Cignetti holding the National Championship trophy aloft, celebrating an undefeated season, and seeing another transfer quarterback, Fernando Mendoza, become the school’s first Heisman Trophy winner and come off the board as the first-overall selection in the NFL Draft.

But the days of celebrating are over, and it is time to get back to work for Cignetti and company.

“Obviously, a lot of people on the outside are still celebrating our success, and maybe the administration and people at the university, but in the building you flip the page,” said Cignetti to Athlon Sports in the outlet’s season preview magazine. “I think we’ve done a good job of that, I really do. There’s a lot of work to be done. Everybody’s 0-0 right now. All the new guys that are out there have done some good things and some not-so-good things, and usually they have a great summer, and they’re a different guy in fall camp and during the season. We’re counting on them being on the same trajectory as the other ones, but I don’t notice anybody resting on their laurels.”

As for those new faces, Cignetti again dipped into the transfer portal to address needs on both sides of the football. With both Omar Cooper Jr. and Elijah Sarratt off to the NFL, Indiana added Nick Marsh from Michigan State, and he’ll line up across from returning starter Charlie Becker.

Cignetti talked about Marsh at the Big Ten Media Days last month.

“I think Nick Marsh is a proven two-year player at wide receiver, very productive. I think you’re probably talking about the golden shoes the first day of practice. We don’t do that where I coach. He got the message, and he’s been great. He had a great summer, and I’m expecting big things from him,” said the Indiana coach.

Outside of Marsh, Cignetti pointed to a pair of transfers from Kansas State as well as running back Turbo Richard as some of the other transfers that has stood out so far.

“The two Kansas State guys, the D-Ends [Tobi Osunsamni and Chiddi Obiazor], I’ve noticed them really starting to take a step. Turbo is very consistent at running back. Joe Brunner [an offensive guard] from Wisconsin. The safety from Wisconsin, [Preston] Zachman, is making nice progress,” said Cignetti to Athlon Sports.

But the biggest transfer is the one tasked with replacing Mendoza. That would be Josh Hoover, who joins the Hoosiers after two years as a starter at TCU.

“He’s a quick thinker who has played a lot of football,” described Cignetti to Athlon Sports. “He moves better than Rourke, but Rourke has some natural quarterback instincts that Josh has, too. Fernando, he’s six-foot-five, could really move. We’ve always tilted more towards the run in terms of the run-pass ratio, although in competitive situations last year, we’re about 50-50.

“Whereas where [Hoover] came from, they’re throwing the ball about 60% of the time. It’ll be a lot different for him, more advantageous. He did turn the ball over at TCU, so we’re going to have to do a great job of protecting the ball.”

At the Big Ten Media Days, Cignetti was asked for a similarity between Hoover, and the QB he is replacing.

Cignetti started with a quip, as you might expect.

“They both played quarterback, they were both starting quarterbacks where they came from,” began the head coach.

“Josh Hoover has won a lot of football games, thrown for a lot of yards, thrown a lot of touchdown passes. He has an innate ability to play the position of quarterback, kind of a natural passer, very accurate, processes very quickly.

“I think the things we’ll ask him to do are different than the things TCU asked him to do. We’re not going to put the ball in his hand and say go win the game and outscore people. We’re going to give him a run game, a defense, and special teams and every once in a while on third down a punch-positive play.”

Cignetti closed his remarks on Hoover by outlining some expectations.

“I’m really anxious to see Josh and the progress he’s made in practice starting on Wednesday and fall camp. All the one-year quarterbacks have followed the same line, and I expect him to, as well.”

As for what to expect from Cignetti and the Hoosiers this season, the new standard is, well, the standard.

“I think we have a lot of nice pieces. I think we excel at development and creating the intangibles, and once we get closer to the season as a staff, it’s extremely beneficial. The staff continuity that I have had, that President Whitten and Scott Dolson make possible, we’re on the same page. They know the blueprint, the process, the plan, okay,” said Cignetti at Big Ten Media Days.

“What it really does, to be honest with you, and we’re still trying to get better, we’re trying to improve the way we do things, is those down times can really be down times for the coaches, which they like their quality of life with me, which I think the players do, too, with the way we practice.

“All I can say is, like, going into this season, I know I’m going to get asked some questions. We’re very process-driven. Our focus is on the things you have to do in the here and now to improve as much as possible. To improve as much as possible today. Those types of things. We don’t talk about product, results. We don’t talk about championships, playoffs, National Championships, those sorts of things, okay.

“I’m a firm believer in our blueprint. Our Monday morning meeting will be very similar to what it was eight years ago. It’ll be about an hour long. There’s certain things we’ll do in there, there’s certain things I’ll say in the team meeting Tuesday night that I said eight years ago. It’s not word for word, but it’s pretty damn close.

“The way we practice, pretty similar to what we did eight years ago. We have a way of doing things. We’ve got guys that have been together, and all we do is win.”

Do not expect any excuses.

“The Big Ten is the best league in football, and a lot of really good football teams it’s hard to win on the road, very physical football teams, very well-coached. It definitely prepares you for the playoffs,” said Cignetti as he concluded his remarks at Big Ten Media Days.

“There’s no doubt about it, the numbers speak for themselves.

“We don’t run a hype machine up here in the Midwest. We believe everything is earned, not given. When we fall short, we say: We fell short. We don’t cry a river, whine and complain. That’s why we’re the best.”

Of course, Cignetti has not seen a losing season yet as a head coach.

Hard to expect him to start now.

#Indiana #Curt #Cignetti #encore">What can Indiana and Curt Cignetti do for an encore?

“Yeah, it’s pretty simple. I win. Google me.”

With those eight words, declared minutes into his first press conference as the new head coach at Indiana, Curt Cignetti announced his vision for the school’s football program, which had languished at the bottom of the Big Ten standings for years. It became a viral sensation, with many wondering if Cignetti could back up that declaration.

After leading the Hoosiers to the College Football Playoff during the 2024 season, Cignetti took Indiana a step further last year, guiding the school to its first national championship, and helping Fernando Mendoza become the first Heisman Trophy winner in Indiana history.

So just what, if anything, can Cignetti and the Hoosiers do for an encore?

To answer that question, we might need to look back for a minute.

Cignetti’s college football journey began in Morgantown, as a backup quarterback for West Virginia. His father was the head coach for the Mountaineers from 1976 through 1979, and after graduating from Morgantown High School in 1979, he enrolled at West Virginia.

And he was buried on the depth chart behind Oliver Luck and Jeff Hostetler. Cignetti appeared in one game during his time on campus, with one rushing attempt against Virginia during the 1981 season.

After graduating, he immediately moved into coaching, taking a role on the staff at Pittsburgh as a graduate assistant. Cignetti began working his way through the coaching ranks on the offensive side of the ball, ultimately landing on the coaching staff at Alabama, during Nick Saban’s first season in Tuscaloosa, as the team’s wide receivers coach and recruiting coordinator.

During his time at Alabama — stretching from 2007 through 2010 — the Crimson Tide won a national title in 2009, and won 29 consecutive games. Cignetti was credited with helping recruit and develop players such as Mark Ingram II, Dont’a Hightower, and Julio Jones, who Cignetti also coached as his WR coach. The 2008 Alabama recruiting class included several future first-round picks (Hightower, Jones, Ingram, Marcell Dareus, and Mark Barron among them).

But Cignetti had an eye on taking a head coaching job, and was a finalist for the Kent State position, Saban’s alma mater, at the end of the 2010 season. The gig went to Darrell Hazell, and Cignetti turned his attention elsewhere.

Indiana University of Pennsylvania, a Division II program where his father, Frank, won 14 conference titles over two decades.

Saban warned him against taking the job — “you can get lost down there” he said — but Cignetti went anyway.

And started a head coaching career that has yet to end with a losing season.

“I woke up many mornings like, ‘What did I do?’” Cignetti admitted while looking back in 2024. “But we got things rolling.”

After six seasons at IUP, including three trips to the Division II playoffs, Cignetti made his next move, taking the job at Elon. In two years coaching the Phoenix, he led the school to a combined 14-9 record, and two consecutive spots in the FCS playoffs. Then in 2019 he moved within the Colonial Athletic Association, taking the job at James Madison.

In his first three years in Harrisonburg, he led the Dukes to the FBS playoffs all three seasons, including a loss in the title game in 2019 and losses in the semifinals in both 2020 and 2021. Then JMU moved to the Sun Belt Conference for 2022, and again the winning continued. The Dukes finished 8-3 in their first season in the FCS, and improved to 11-1 in 2023, securing a spot in the Armed Forces Bowl.

That’s when Indiana came calling.

When Cignetti arrived in Bloomington, he inherited a team that was coming off a 3-9 record, and had endured three consecutive losing seasons. Indiana went 9-27 in the three years before Cignetti was hired. But as you might expect from Cignetti having seen him — and his resume — he did not intend to start losing in 2024.

“There was sort of a dark cloud lingering over the football program here,” Cignetti said. “A lot of people had given up on it, to be honest with you. That sort of attitude permeated people outside the university, too. I could sense it talking to the media. It was my first day here. I could just feel it and I didn’t like it. I wasn’t going to have any of it.”

Cignetti relied heavily on the transfer portal for his first year in the Big Ten, including 13 players who followed him from James Madison. That list of transfers also included quarterback Kurtis Rourke, who joined Indiana from Ohio.

As Rourke pointed out, it was all part of Cignetti’s plan to transform the culture overnight.

“He started to weed out who was going to help or hurt the team,” Rourke said. “He didn’t care about feelings. He wanted to set a tone and develop a culture. He earned a lot of respect from us.”

Part of that culture shift rested in how the transfers viewed themselves, and mirrored Cignetti’s own path to a Big Ten program. 21 of the incoming transfers for that first season came from either FCS schools or Group of 5 teams, so much so that the group gave themselves the nickname the “Group of Five All-Stars.” Said linebacker Aiden Fisher in 2024, ”[t]hey said we had too many Group of Five players. We’ve put that in the back of our mind. We remember it.

“We’ve all got that edge,” Fisher added. ‘I’ve always deserved to be here in the spotlight.’”

The same could be said for their coach.

“It took me a while, right?” Cignetti described in 2024. “I had to take the path less traveled to get to where I am. A little something to prove.”

Indiana reached the College Football Playoff in that first season, losing just one game in the regular season, at Ohio State. But with Rourke playing on a torn ACL that he was managing the entire season, Indiana struggled in the First Round game against Notre Dame, bowing out by a final score of 27-17.

As for last season? You know how that ended, with Cignetti holding the National Championship trophy aloft, celebrating an undefeated season, and seeing another transfer quarterback, Fernando Mendoza, become the school’s first Heisman Trophy winner and come off the board as the first-overall selection in the NFL Draft.

But the days of celebrating are over, and it is time to get back to work for Cignetti and company.

“Obviously, a lot of people on the outside are still celebrating our success, and maybe the administration and people at the university, but in the building you flip the page,” said Cignetti to Athlon Sports in the outlet’s season preview magazine. “I think we’ve done a good job of that, I really do. There’s a lot of work to be done. Everybody’s 0-0 right now. All the new guys that are out there have done some good things and some not-so-good things, and usually they have a great summer, and they’re a different guy in fall camp and during the season. We’re counting on them being on the same trajectory as the other ones, but I don’t notice anybody resting on their laurels.”

As for those new faces, Cignetti again dipped into the transfer portal to address needs on both sides of the football. With both Omar Cooper Jr. and Elijah Sarratt off to the NFL, Indiana added Nick Marsh from Michigan State, and he’ll line up across from returning starter Charlie Becker.

Cignetti talked about Marsh at the Big Ten Media Days last month.

“I think Nick Marsh is a proven two-year player at wide receiver, very productive. I think you’re probably talking about the golden shoes the first day of practice. We don’t do that where I coach. He got the message, and he’s been great. He had a great summer, and I’m expecting big things from him,” said the Indiana coach.

Outside of Marsh, Cignetti pointed to a pair of transfers from Kansas State as well as running back Turbo Richard as some of the other transfers that has stood out so far.

“The two Kansas State guys, the D-Ends [Tobi Osunsamni and Chiddi Obiazor], I’ve noticed them really starting to take a step. Turbo is very consistent at running back. Joe Brunner [an offensive guard] from Wisconsin. The safety from Wisconsin, [Preston] Zachman, is making nice progress,” said Cignetti to Athlon Sports.

But the biggest transfer is the one tasked with replacing Mendoza. That would be Josh Hoover, who joins the Hoosiers after two years as a starter at TCU.

“He’s a quick thinker who has played a lot of football,” described Cignetti to Athlon Sports. “He moves better than Rourke, but Rourke has some natural quarterback instincts that Josh has, too. Fernando, he’s six-foot-five, could really move. We’ve always tilted more towards the run in terms of the run-pass ratio, although in competitive situations last year, we’re about 50-50.

“Whereas where [Hoover] came from, they’re throwing the ball about 60% of the time. It’ll be a lot different for him, more advantageous. He did turn the ball over at TCU, so we’re going to have to do a great job of protecting the ball.”

At the Big Ten Media Days, Cignetti was asked for a similarity between Hoover, and the QB he is replacing.

Cignetti started with a quip, as you might expect.

“They both played quarterback, they were both starting quarterbacks where they came from,” began the head coach.

“Josh Hoover has won a lot of football games, thrown for a lot of yards, thrown a lot of touchdown passes. He has an innate ability to play the position of quarterback, kind of a natural passer, very accurate, processes very quickly.

“I think the things we’ll ask him to do are different than the things TCU asked him to do. We’re not going to put the ball in his hand and say go win the game and outscore people. We’re going to give him a run game, a defense, and special teams and every once in a while on third down a punch-positive play.”

Cignetti closed his remarks on Hoover by outlining some expectations.

“I’m really anxious to see Josh and the progress he’s made in practice starting on Wednesday and fall camp. All the one-year quarterbacks have followed the same line, and I expect him to, as well.”

As for what to expect from Cignetti and the Hoosiers this season, the new standard is, well, the standard.

“I think we have a lot of nice pieces. I think we excel at development and creating the intangibles, and once we get closer to the season as a staff, it’s extremely beneficial. The staff continuity that I have had, that President Whitten and Scott Dolson make possible, we’re on the same page. They know the blueprint, the process, the plan, okay,” said Cignetti at Big Ten Media Days.

“What it really does, to be honest with you, and we’re still trying to get better, we’re trying to improve the way we do things, is those down times can really be down times for the coaches, which they like their quality of life with me, which I think the players do, too, with the way we practice.

“All I can say is, like, going into this season, I know I’m going to get asked some questions. We’re very process-driven. Our focus is on the things you have to do in the here and now to improve as much as possible. To improve as much as possible today. Those types of things. We don’t talk about product, results. We don’t talk about championships, playoffs, National Championships, those sorts of things, okay.

“I’m a firm believer in our blueprint. Our Monday morning meeting will be very similar to what it was eight years ago. It’ll be about an hour long. There’s certain things we’ll do in there, there’s certain things I’ll say in the team meeting Tuesday night that I said eight years ago. It’s not word for word, but it’s pretty damn close.

“The way we practice, pretty similar to what we did eight years ago. We have a way of doing things. We’ve got guys that have been together, and all we do is win.”

Do not expect any excuses.

“The Big Ten is the best league in football, and a lot of really good football teams it’s hard to win on the road, very physical football teams, very well-coached. It definitely prepares you for the playoffs,” said Cignetti as he concluded his remarks at Big Ten Media Days.

“There’s no doubt about it, the numbers speak for themselves.

“We don’t run a hype machine up here in the Midwest. We believe everything is earned, not given. When we fall short, we say: We fell short. We don’t cry a river, whine and complain. That’s why we’re the best.”

Of course, Cignetti has not seen a losing season yet as a head coach.

Hard to expect him to start now.

#Indiana #Curt #Cignetti #encore

Ashish Yadav and T. Dharanidharan both qualified for the men’s javelin throw final on Wednesday, the opening day of the World Athletics U20 Championships in Eugene, Oregon, USA.

Neither of the two Indians achieved the automatic qualification mark of 72.50m but they finished amongst the Top 12 throwers which helped them book their spot for Friday’s final.

While Ashish stood second amongst the 26 athletes across the two groups with an effort of 69.87m, Dharanidharan grabbed the last qualification spot with a throw of 68.07m.

South Africa’s Jan-Hendrik Heymans topped the qualification round with his one and only throw of 76.02m.

In men’s 800m, Uwin Anand couldn’t progress beyond the first round but Mogali Venkatram secured his place in the semifinals. In the second heat, Uwin finished seventh as he clocked 1:52.37s while in the fifth and final heat, Mogali finished third with a timing of 1:52.81s.

Top five finishers in every heat along with two fastest losers from the rest of the field grabbed qualification spots.

READ | Ek Bihari sau pe bhaari – Kitchen boy turns track and field pioneer for state

In 4x400m mixed relay, Indian quartet recorded a Season’s Best timing but missed out on qualifying for the final.

Piyush Raj, Tahura Khatun, Sayed Sabeer and Thiya Arumugam clocked 3:22.85s to finish fourth in the first heat. However, only the top three teams from each of the three heats was guaranteed a spot in the final.

In heat 1, Great Britain topped with a timing of 3:21.27s, Poland finished second after clocking 3:21.47s while Czechia grabbed the final qualification spot in 3:21.58s.

Later in the day, discus thrower Amanat Kamboj will also begin her campaign in the qualification round.

Published on Aug 05, 2026

#World #Athletics #U20 #Championships #Ashish #Dharanidharan #qualify #javelin #throw #final">World Athletics U20 Championships 2026: Ashish, Dharanidharan qualify for javelin throw final  Ashish Yadav and T. Dharanidharan both qualified for the men’s javelin throw final on Wednesday, the opening day of the World Athletics U20 Championships in Eugene, Oregon, USA.Neither of the two Indians achieved the automatic qualification mark of 72.50m but they finished amongst the Top 12 throwers which helped them book their spot for Friday’s final.While Ashish stood second amongst the 26 athletes across the two groups with an effort of 69.87m, Dharanidharan grabbed the last qualification spot with a throw of 68.07m.South Africa’s Jan-Hendrik Heymans topped the qualification round with his one and only throw of 76.02m.In men’s 800m, Uwin Anand couldn’t progress beyond the first round but Mogali Venkatram secured his place in the semifinals. In the second heat, Uwin finished seventh as he clocked 1:52.37s while in the fifth and final heat, Mogali finished third with a timing of 1:52.81s.Top five finishers in every heat along with two fastest losers from the rest of the field grabbed qualification spots.READ |        Ek Bihari sau pe bhaari – Kitchen boy turns track and field pioneer for stateIn 4x400m mixed relay, Indian quartet recorded a Season’s Best timing but missed out on qualifying for the final.Piyush Raj, Tahura Khatun, Sayed Sabeer and Thiya Arumugam clocked 3:22.85s to finish fourth in the first heat. However, only the top three teams from each of the three heats was guaranteed a spot in the final.In heat 1, Great Britain topped with a timing of 3:21.27s, Poland finished second after clocking 3:21.47s while Czechia grabbed the final qualification spot in 3:21.58s.Later in the day, discus thrower Amanat Kamboj will also begin her campaign in the qualification round.Published on Aug 05, 2026  #World #Athletics #U20 #Championships #Ashish #Dharanidharan #qualify #javelin #throw #final

Ek Bihari sau pe bhaari – Kitchen boy turns track and field pioneer for state

In 4x400m mixed relay, Indian quartet recorded a Season’s Best timing but missed out on qualifying for the final.

Piyush Raj, Tahura Khatun, Sayed Sabeer and Thiya Arumugam clocked 3:22.85s to finish fourth in the first heat. However, only the top three teams from each of the three heats was guaranteed a spot in the final.

In heat 1, Great Britain topped with a timing of 3:21.27s, Poland finished second after clocking 3:21.47s while Czechia grabbed the final qualification spot in 3:21.58s.

Later in the day, discus thrower Amanat Kamboj will also begin her campaign in the qualification round.

Published on Aug 05, 2026

#World #Athletics #U20 #Championships #Ashish #Dharanidharan #qualify #javelin #throw #final">World Athletics U20 Championships 2026: Ashish, Dharanidharan qualify for javelin throw final

Ashish Yadav and T. Dharanidharan both qualified for the men’s javelin throw final on Wednesday, the opening day of the World Athletics U20 Championships in Eugene, Oregon, USA.

Neither of the two Indians achieved the automatic qualification mark of 72.50m but they finished amongst the Top 12 throwers which helped them book their spot for Friday’s final.

While Ashish stood second amongst the 26 athletes across the two groups with an effort of 69.87m, Dharanidharan grabbed the last qualification spot with a throw of 68.07m.

South Africa’s Jan-Hendrik Heymans topped the qualification round with his one and only throw of 76.02m.

In men’s 800m, Uwin Anand couldn’t progress beyond the first round but Mogali Venkatram secured his place in the semifinals. In the second heat, Uwin finished seventh as he clocked 1:52.37s while in the fifth and final heat, Mogali finished third with a timing of 1:52.81s.

Top five finishers in every heat along with two fastest losers from the rest of the field grabbed qualification spots.

READ | Ek Bihari sau pe bhaari – Kitchen boy turns track and field pioneer for state

In 4x400m mixed relay, Indian quartet recorded a Season’s Best timing but missed out on qualifying for the final.

Piyush Raj, Tahura Khatun, Sayed Sabeer and Thiya Arumugam clocked 3:22.85s to finish fourth in the first heat. However, only the top three teams from each of the three heats was guaranteed a spot in the final.

In heat 1, Great Britain topped with a timing of 3:21.27s, Poland finished second after clocking 3:21.47s while Czechia grabbed the final qualification spot in 3:21.58s.

Later in the day, discus thrower Amanat Kamboj will also begin her campaign in the qualification round.

Published on Aug 05, 2026

#World #Athletics #U20 #Championships #Ashish #Dharanidharan #qualify #javelin #throw #final

Post Comment