Why ScanPST Fails to Repair Corrupt PST Files — and the Best Alternatives
Whether you like using it or not, Microsoft Outlook is the lifeblood of almost every corporation in 2026. And there’s a good chance your work emails, meetings, and attachments all live inside the email client. Sadly, as with many of Microsoft’s worsening services these days, Outlook can also run into trouble, with the most common problem being an error that says your data file can’t be accessed. This frustrating issue has been around for a long time, and yet Microsoft still hasn’t completely fixed it.
Instead, Microsoft offers its own Inbox Repair Tool, better known as ScanPST. Since it ships with Outlook, it’s usually the first recommendation you’ll find. And to be fair, it does work in some situations. But a lot of times, it either simply refuses to repair the file, gets stuck midway through the process, or successfully repairs the mailbox only for important emails and folders to go missing afterward. That’s because the tool was made to fix minor errors, not to recover severely corrupted mailboxes. That’s why several third-party Outlook PST repair tools now exist that claim to mend Outlook for you. Before looking at these alternatives, though, it’s better to know why PST files become corrupted in the first place.
Why a PST File Gets Corrupted & Reasons
For the uninitiated, a PST file is essentially a database containing all your emails and important attachments. Whenever you ask POP3-configured Outlook for a particular document, it retrieves it from a local saved PST file, making it a fundamental component. Like any database, these files rely on their internal structure remaining intact. If that structure is damaged, Outlook cannot access your information, and there can be plenty of reasons for that.
Large PST files: Bigger Outlook data files are more likely to become corrupted, especially as they approach Microsoft’s recommended size limits.
Unexpected shutdowns: Power outages, system crashes, or force-closing Outlook while it’s saving data can damage the PST file.
Storage drive issues: Failing hard drives, bad sectors, or insufficient disk space can lead to file corruption.
Using network drives: Microsoft advises against storing PST files on network locations, as unstable connections can interrupt read/write operations.
Faulty add-ins or malware: Buggy Outlook add-ins, malware, or third-party utilities can also corrupt PST files over time.
Why ScanPST Fails to Restore PST Data?
The reasons are plenty, and that’s exactly why Microsoft bundles its own repair tool, ScanPST, with Outlook. In theory, it scans the internal structure and attempts to repair damaged indexes and references so Outlook can open the file again.
However, there is a problem. If ScanPST encounters mailbox items it can’t validate, it often removes them instead of rebuilding them.
How To Repair A Corrupt PST File Without ScanPST
Since we all would dearly love to get important files and attachments back, the first thing you should do is create a copy of the original PST file. Working directly on the only copy of your mailbox is risky because every repair attempt changes the database. So keep the original intact. Next, if you’re dealing with smaller PST files or working on managed office computers where software installation isn’t possible, an online PST repair service would be your best bet. One of the safer options is the Stellar Online PST Repair service. It works online, and Outlook itself doesn’t even need to be present on the system. It supports PST files from Outlook 2003 through Outlook 2024, including both ANSI and Unicode formats, and lets you preview mailbox folders and recovered item counts before downloading the repaired file.
Unlike ScanPST, the service’s main purpose is to repair and recover your files. And if your PST file is less than 500MB, you don’t even have to pay anything. The premium version increases that limit to 5GB. The only requirement is a stable connection, which shouldn’t be a problem in a corporate office.
Repair A Corrupt PST File Using Stellar Online PST Repair
Before we begin, it’s really important to back up your original PST file. No matter how great a tool is, Microsoft recommends keeping a copy before attempting any repair, as the recovery process modifies the mailbox structure. Once done:
Close Microsoft Outlook completely. Even if you’ve closed the Outlook window, it can continue running in the background, keeping the PST file locked.
Open Stellar Online PST Repair. Since the tool runs entirely in your browser, there’s nothing to install, and Outlook doesn’t even need to be present on your PC.
Upload your corrupt PST file. Select the mailbox you want to repair and upload it to the service.
Preview the recovered mailbox. Before downloading anything, browse through your recovered data. Check important folders like Inbox, Sent Items, Deleted Items, Archive, Contacts, Calendar, Tasks, and any custom folders you created.
Download the repaired PST file. Once you’re satisfied with the preview, download the repaired mailbox.
Open the repaired PST in Outlook. In Outlook, head to File → Open & Export → Open Outlook Data File, then select the repaired PST. Verify all information.
When to Use a Desktop PST Repair Tool Instead
As good as browser-based repair services are, they can only be used for quick fixes. Large mailboxes containing years’ worth of emails can take a long time to upload, and severe corruption is often beyond what an online service is designed to handle. In that case, the Stellar Repair for Outlook app makes much more sense. It has the same bells and whistles, like the ability to preview recoverable emails in detail, such as emails, attachments, contacts, calendars, and other important information, but processes everything locally, so your mailbox never leaves your computer.
It also doesn’t impose practical file-size limitations, supports encrypted and password-protected PST files, and allows recovered data to be saved not only as a new PST but also in formats like MSG, EML, HTML, PDF, and others. For businesses or IT administrators, the Technician edition can even export recovered mailboxes directly to Microsoft 365 or Exchange, making it easier to restore users without additional migration steps.
ScanPST vs Stellar Online PST Repair vs Desktop Recovery
Feature
ScanPST
Stellar Online PST Repair
Stellar Repair for Outlook (Desktop)
Installation required
No (Inbuilt)
No
Yes
Handles severe corruption
Limited
Moderate
Yes
Supports large PST files
Limited
Up to 5GB
Unlimited file size
Preview before recovery
No
Yes (Only folder structure)
Yes (Complete Mailbox data in details)
Recovery approach
Repairs the structure, may remove invalid items
Recovers mailbox
Recovers mailbox
Export options
None
PST
PST, MSG, EML, HTML, PDF, Microsoft 365, live Exchange
Processing location
Local
Cloud
Local
Conclusion
ScanPST remains a useful first step whenever Outlook reports a damaged PST file. It’s free, already installed alongside Outlook, and can often repair minor hiccups. However, it’s not the golden child. It fails to retain your precious files. If you don’t want that to happen, it makes sense to consider alternatives that focus on recovering mailbox data. An online repair service is often enough for smaller files and one-time repairs, while a dedicated desktop recovery tool offers more flexibility for larger or business-critical mailboxes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Where is ScanPST.exe located?
The exact location depends on your Outlook version and installation method, but ScanPST is typically stored inside the Microsoft Office installation folder under Program Files.
Does ScanPST delete emails?
Yes. If ScanPST comes across mailbox items that it cannot validate during the repair process, those items may be removed from the repaired PST file.
Can ScanPST repair large PST files?
In theory, yes. But performance tends to decline as file sizes grow. Severe corruption or very large mailboxes often require more specialized recovery software.
How do I repair a PST file without losing data?
Always create a copy of the original PST before attempting repairs. If ScanPST doesn’t resolve the issue, using a recovery tool that rebuilds mailbox data rather than deleting damaged items is a safer approach.
Can I repair a PST file without installing software?
Absolutely. Browser-based repair services allow you to upload supported PST files, preview recoverable mailbox data, and download the repaired file without installing Outlook or additional software.
Whether you like using it or not, Microsoft Outlook is the lifeblood of almost every corporation in 2026. And there’s a good chance your work emails, meetings, and attachments all live inside the email client. Sadly, as with many of Microsoft’s worsening services these days, Outlook can also run into trouble, with the most common problem being an error that says your data file can’t be accessed. This frustrating issue has been around for a long time, and yet Microsoft still hasn’t completely fixed it.
Instead, Microsoft offers its own Inbox Repair Tool, better known as ScanPST. Since it ships with Outlook, it’s usually the first recommendation you’ll find. And to be fair, it does work in some situations. But a lot of times, it either simply refuses to repair the file, gets stuck midway through the process, or successfully repairs the mailbox only for important emails and folders to go missing afterward. That’s because the tool was made to fix minor errors, not to recover severely corrupted mailboxes. That’s why several third-party Outlook PST repair tools now exist that claim to mend Outlook for you. Before looking at these alternatives, though, it’s better to know why PST files become corrupted in the first place.
Why a PST File Gets Corrupted & Reasons
For the uninitiated, a PST file is essentially a database containing all your emails and important attachments. Whenever you ask POP3-configured Outlook for a particular document, it retrieves it from a local saved PST file, making it a fundamental component. Like any database, these files rely on their internal structure remaining intact. If that structure is damaged, Outlook cannot access your information, and there can be plenty of reasons for that.
Large PST files: Bigger Outlook data files are more likely to become corrupted, especially as they approach Microsoft’s recommended size limits.
Unexpected shutdowns: Power outages, system crashes, or force-closing Outlook while it’s saving data can damage the PST file.
Storage drive issues: Failing hard drives, bad sectors, or insufficient disk space can lead to file corruption.
Using network drives: Microsoft advises against storing PST files on network locations, as unstable connections can interrupt read/write operations.
Faulty add-ins or malware: Buggy Outlook add-ins, malware, or third-party utilities can also corrupt PST files over time.
Why ScanPST Fails to Restore PST Data?
The reasons are plenty, and that’s exactly why Microsoft bundles its own repair tool, ScanPST, with Outlook. In theory, it scans the internal structure and attempts to repair damaged indexes and references so Outlook can open the file again.
However, there is a problem. If ScanPST encounters mailbox items it can’t validate, it often removes them instead of rebuilding them.
How To Repair A Corrupt PST File Without ScanPST
Since we all would dearly love to get important files and attachments back, the first thing you should do is create a copy of the original PST file. Working directly on the only copy of your mailbox is risky because every repair attempt changes the database. So keep the original intact. Next, if you’re dealing with smaller PST files or working on managed office computers where software installation isn’t possible, an online PST repair service would be your best bet. One of the safer options is the Stellar Online PST Repair service. It works online, and Outlook itself doesn’t even need to be present on the system. It supports PST files from Outlook 2003 through Outlook 2024, including both ANSI and Unicode formats, and lets you preview mailbox folders and recovered item counts before downloading the repaired file.
Unlike ScanPST, the service’s main purpose is to repair and recover your files. And if your PST file is less than 500MB, you don’t even have to pay anything. The premium version increases that limit to 5GB. The only requirement is a stable connection, which shouldn’t be a problem in a corporate office.
Repair A Corrupt PST File Using Stellar Online PST Repair
Before we begin, it’s really important to back up your original PST file. No matter how great a tool is, Microsoft recommends keeping a copy before attempting any repair, as the recovery process modifies the mailbox structure. Once done:
Close Microsoft Outlook completely. Even if you’ve closed the Outlook window, it can continue running in the background, keeping the PST file locked.
Open Stellar Online PST Repair. Since the tool runs entirely in your browser, there’s nothing to install, and Outlook doesn’t even need to be present on your PC.
Upload your corrupt PST file. Select the mailbox you want to repair and upload it to the service.
Preview the recovered mailbox. Before downloading anything, browse through your recovered data. Check important folders like Inbox, Sent Items, Deleted Items, Archive, Contacts, Calendar, Tasks, and any custom folders you created.
Download the repaired PST file. Once you’re satisfied with the preview, download the repaired mailbox.
Open the repaired PST in Outlook. In Outlook, head to File → Open & Export → Open Outlook Data File, then select the repaired PST. Verify all information.
When to Use a Desktop PST Repair Tool Instead
As good as browser-based repair services are, they can only be used for quick fixes. Large mailboxes containing years’ worth of emails can take a long time to upload, and severe corruption is often beyond what an online service is designed to handle. In that case, the Stellar Repair for Outlook app makes much more sense. It has the same bells and whistles, like the ability to preview recoverable emails in detail, such as emails, attachments, contacts, calendars, and other important information, but processes everything locally, so your mailbox never leaves your computer.
It also doesn’t impose practical file-size limitations, supports encrypted and password-protected PST files, and allows recovered data to be saved not only as a new PST but also in formats like MSG, EML, HTML, PDF, and others. For businesses or IT administrators, the Technician edition can even export recovered mailboxes directly to Microsoft 365 or Exchange, making it easier to restore users without additional migration steps.
ScanPST vs Stellar Online PST Repair vs Desktop Recovery
Feature
ScanPST
Stellar Online PST Repair
Stellar Repair for Outlook (Desktop)
Installation required
No (Inbuilt)
No
Yes
Handles severe corruption
Limited
Moderate
Yes
Supports large PST files
Limited
Up to 5GB
Unlimited file size
Preview before recovery
No
Yes (Only folder structure)
Yes (Complete Mailbox data in details)
Recovery approach
Repairs the structure, may remove invalid items
Recovers mailbox
Recovers mailbox
Export options
None
PST
PST, MSG, EML, HTML, PDF, Microsoft 365, live Exchange
Processing location
Local
Cloud
Local
Conclusion
ScanPST remains a useful first step whenever Outlook reports a damaged PST file. It’s free, already installed alongside Outlook, and can often repair minor hiccups. However, it’s not the golden child. It fails to retain your precious files. If you don’t want that to happen, it makes sense to consider alternatives that focus on recovering mailbox data. An online repair service is often enough for smaller files and one-time repairs, while a dedicated desktop recovery tool offers more flexibility for larger or business-critical mailboxes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Where is ScanPST.exe located?
The exact location depends on your Outlook version and installation method, but ScanPST is typically stored inside the Microsoft Office installation folder under Program Files.
Does ScanPST delete emails?
Yes. If ScanPST comes across mailbox items that it cannot validate during the repair process, those items may be removed from the repaired PST file.
Can ScanPST repair large PST files?
In theory, yes. But performance tends to decline as file sizes grow. Severe corruption or very large mailboxes often require more specialized recovery software.
How do I repair a PST file without losing data?
Always create a copy of the original PST before attempting repairs. If ScanPST doesn’t resolve the issue, using a recovery tool that rebuilds mailbox data rather than deleting damaged items is a safer approach.
Can I repair a PST file without installing software?
Absolutely. Browser-based repair services allow you to upload supported PST files, preview recoverable mailbox data, and download the repaired file without installing Outlook or additional software.
Source link
#ScanPST #Fails #Repair #Corrupt #PST #Files #Alternatives
#49ers #coach #Tesla #Autopilot #crashedElectric Cars,Entertainment,News,Sports,Tesla,Transportation">49ers coach says his Tesla was on Autopilot when he crashed
“I’ve had Autopilot for nine years, so I’m pretty comfortable with it and, you know, who knows what happened when I turned around? Whether it malfunctioned or whether I knocked it off? That’s something I don’t know yet. But regardless, that’s… it is always your fault, whether you’re on Autopilot or not. You can’t take your eyes off the road. It’s a partnership driving, you don’t just turn it over to a computer.”
Mixed in with the new developments are trendy food spots like Hoppers and BAO. Hop a train from King’s Cross, and founders can be in Cambridge in 45 minutes to source talent or can be in Paris in two hours to strike a deal.
Who would have guessed that a little more than 20 years ago, this was one of the seediest areas in London?
“In the ’80s, crack and heroin made the area a major narcotics market,” Hussein Kanji, an investor at Hoxton Ventures, said, recalling syringes in tree trunks and gangs patrolling the streets. “In 1982, the local church was occupied by the English Collective of Prostitutes for 12 straight days.” Then, in the early 2000s, a real estate developer had a dream and, well, “now it is the AI hotbed of the United Kingdom,” Kanji said. “What a change.”
Around 18 months ago, his portfolio company BioCorteX moved from the neighborhood Holborn to the Jellicoe building in King’s Cross, hoping to be near the action. “Lots going on in London right now,” Nik Sharma, co-founder of BioCorteX, told me. “Lots of hyperscalers moving in.” That includes, reportedly, Jeff Bezos’ AI company Prometheus, which is also said to be in talks to move into the Jellicoe.
There are around 3,600 AI startups in London, which, together, have raised around $12.1 billion out of the $14.8 billion raised in the city since late July, according to Dealroom. Since the start of June, AI-related startups have leased more than 1 million square feet of office space in London, according to the real estate firm Knight Frank. With that, prime rents in King’s Cross have risen 18% over the past three years, Chris Dunn, a commercial insight associate at the firm, told me.
That percentage represents only the largest leases encompassing at least 10,000 square feet, like the ones OpenAI and Prometheus are signing. The shorter deals go for even more, he said, and now the vacancy rate for conventional office space is just 0.9%. “Demand has outstripped supply,” he continued.
Today, one of the big topics of the area is sovereignty. It was a wake-up call for many when Anthropic shut off access to Mythos and Fable this summer, leaving some in the ecosystem to conclude: “We’d better look after ourselves,” Saul Klein, co-founder of the VC firm Phoenix Court, told me.
Phoenix Court is located in the King’s Cross area and has three portfolio companies in the vicinity, including Olix (which just announced a $3.3 billion valuation), Early Health and CoMind. Robin Klein, co-founder of the firm, said the shutdown of Fable and Mythos access was a “small but sharp reminder that Europe can’t simply rent its AI capabilities and capacity; it needs to build and hold some of its own.” King’s Cross, he said, is where much of this building is actually happening.
“The bigger question,” he continued, “is whether the U.K. builds the infrastructure, compute, energy, capital, to make this self-reliance durable, rather than just hosting outposts of U.S. labs.”
Image Credits:Phoenix Court
Top founders want to stay
Simon Kohl, founder of Latent Labs, has offices in King’s Cross and San Francisco. The London office, at the moment, is growing faster, and he’s more bullish than ever on the ecosystem, he said. “The mood right now feels less like London trying to catch up and more like London becoming one of the default places to start a serious AI company,” he said.
Look around and you are likely to see Wayve testing its autonomous cars. Founded in 2017 by co-founder Alex Kendall, the unicorn is one of London’s biggest success stories.
“Ten years ago, building a frontier AI company from London felt like an unusual choice,” Kendall told me. “Now it feels like an obvious one.” Wayve moved into King’s Cross in 2018 looking for a space that could double as a garage — “a rare combination in Central London,” Kendall said. He has watched the ecosystem mature around him — and it’s now evident that a startup can stay in London, raise serious capital, hire world-class AI talent, and remain globally competitive, he said.
Down the street from Anthropic’s new 158,000-square-foot office is the AI agent builder Sierra and the AI video platform Synthesia.
Laura Gonzalez Florez, Synthesia’s chief of staff and head of people, says the company moved into its glossy new office building a year ago to accommodate its growing team. They were drawn to the area for the same reason as everyone else: “It’s very close to the airport … very close to where a lot of investors are,” she said.
Image Credits:Synthesia
Around two-thirds of Synthesia’s engineers are remote, Gonzalez Florez said, letting the company tap into an affordable, international, and diverse talent pool and helping it scale faster. “From London, we can hire and work, without any problem, people from anywhere, from Slovenia to Portugal,” she said.
Unsurprisingly, London’s AI boom is also causing a talent war.
U.K. AI job postings have skyrocketed in the past few years, per data from PwC. When Anthropic announced it moved into town earlier this year, it listed, for example, a salary range of £260,000 to £630,000 for a machine learning research engineer when the average salary in London for the same role is around £102,000. Some founders in the U.K., like those in Silicon Valley, are being forced to raise more and bigger rounds to keep up.
“The real test is whether more globally significant AI companies are founded, funded, and scaled from the U.K., while continuing to attract the world’s best talent to build them here,” Zain Ali, founder of the King’s Cross-based AI legal firm Centuro, told me. “If that continues to happen, King’s Cross won’t just be an AI hub. It’ll become one of the U.K.’s most important strategic assets.”
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Mixed in with the new developments are trendy food spots like Hoppers and BAO. Hop a train from King’s Cross, and founders can be in Cambridge in 45 minutes to source talent or can be in Paris in two hours to strike a deal.
Who would have guessed that a little more than 20 years ago, this was one of the seediest areas in London?
“In the ’80s, crack and heroin made the area a major narcotics market,” Hussein Kanji, an investor at Hoxton Ventures, said, recalling syringes in tree trunks and gangs patrolling the streets. “In 1982, the local church was occupied by the English Collective of Prostitutes for 12 straight days.” Then, in the early 2000s, a real estate developer had a dream and, well, “now it is the AI hotbed of the United Kingdom,” Kanji said. “What a change.”
Around 18 months ago, his portfolio company BioCorteX moved from the neighborhood Holborn to the Jellicoe building in King’s Cross, hoping to be near the action. “Lots going on in London right now,” Nik Sharma, co-founder of BioCorteX, told me. “Lots of hyperscalers moving in.” That includes, reportedly, Jeff Bezos’ AI company Prometheus, which is also said to be in talks to move into the Jellicoe.
There are around 3,600 AI startups in London, which, together, have raised around $12.1 billion out of the $14.8 billion raised in the city since late July, according to Dealroom. Since the start of June, AI-related startups have leased more than 1 million square feet of office space in London, according to the real estate firm Knight Frank. With that, prime rents in King’s Cross have risen 18% over the past three years, Chris Dunn, a commercial insight associate at the firm, told me.
That percentage represents only the largest leases encompassing at least 10,000 square feet, like the ones OpenAI and Prometheus are signing. The shorter deals go for even more, he said, and now the vacancy rate for conventional office space is just 0.9%. “Demand has outstripped supply,” he continued.
Today, one of the big topics of the area is sovereignty. It was a wake-up call for many when Anthropic shut off access to Mythos and Fable this summer, leaving some in the ecosystem to conclude: “We’d better look after ourselves,” Saul Klein, co-founder of the VC firm Phoenix Court, told me.
Phoenix Court is located in the King’s Cross area and has three portfolio companies in the vicinity, including Olix (which just announced a $3.3 billion valuation), Early Health and CoMind. Robin Klein, co-founder of the firm, said the shutdown of Fable and Mythos access was a “small but sharp reminder that Europe can’t simply rent its AI capabilities and capacity; it needs to build and hold some of its own.” King’s Cross, he said, is where much of this building is actually happening.
“The bigger question,” he continued, “is whether the U.K. builds the infrastructure, compute, energy, capital, to make this self-reliance durable, rather than just hosting outposts of U.S. labs.”
Image Credits:Phoenix Court
Top founders want to stay
Simon Kohl, founder of Latent Labs, has offices in King’s Cross and San Francisco. The London office, at the moment, is growing faster, and he’s more bullish than ever on the ecosystem, he said. “The mood right now feels less like London trying to catch up and more like London becoming one of the default places to start a serious AI company,” he said.
Look around and you are likely to see Wayve testing its autonomous cars. Founded in 2017 by co-founder Alex Kendall, the unicorn is one of London’s biggest success stories.
“Ten years ago, building a frontier AI company from London felt like an unusual choice,” Kendall told me. “Now it feels like an obvious one.” Wayve moved into King’s Cross in 2018 looking for a space that could double as a garage — “a rare combination in Central London,” Kendall said. He has watched the ecosystem mature around him — and it’s now evident that a startup can stay in London, raise serious capital, hire world-class AI talent, and remain globally competitive, he said.
Down the street from Anthropic’s new 158,000-square-foot office is the AI agent builder Sierra and the AI video platform Synthesia.
Laura Gonzalez Florez, Synthesia’s chief of staff and head of people, says the company moved into its glossy new office building a year ago to accommodate its growing team. They were drawn to the area for the same reason as everyone else: “It’s very close to the airport … very close to where a lot of investors are,” she said.
Image Credits:Synthesia
Around two-thirds of Synthesia’s engineers are remote, Gonzalez Florez said, letting the company tap into an affordable, international, and diverse talent pool and helping it scale faster. “From London, we can hire and work, without any problem, people from anywhere, from Slovenia to Portugal,” she said.
Unsurprisingly, London’s AI boom is also causing a talent war.
U.K. AI job postings have skyrocketed in the past few years, per data from PwC. When Anthropic announced it moved into town earlier this year, it listed, for example, a salary range of £260,000 to £630,000 for a machine learning research engineer when the average salary in London for the same role is around £102,000. Some founders in the U.K., like those in Silicon Valley, are being forced to raise more and bigger rounds to keep up.
“The real test is whether more globally significant AI companies are founded, funded, and scaled from the U.K., while continuing to attract the world’s best talent to build them here,” Zain Ali, founder of the King’s Cross-based AI legal firm Centuro, told me. “If that continues to happen, King’s Cross won’t just be an AI hub. It’ll become one of the U.K.’s most important strategic assets.”
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
#Thisformernotorious #redlight #districtis #nowone #worlds #top #hubs #TechCrunchUK">This former notorious red-light district is now one of the world’s top AI hubs | TechCrunch
What every U.K. AI startup wants to know these days is, how can I get office space in King’s Cross?
The area is so hot that a VC firm allegedly recently won a deal by promising a founder office space in the neighborhood. “We stop at nothing to win deals [for] and to support” founders, “including helping them source office space when needed,” the firm told me when asked about the rumor, declining to confirm or deny any details.
The neighborhood’s popularity began back in 2016 when DeepMind — then newly acquired by Google — moved in. Soon after, a flood of AI startups followed, wanting to be around the Google DeepMind magic. Today, they hope to take advantage of the cluster of AI talent there.
This has transformed King’s Cross into one of the world’s top AI hubs, rivaled only by San Francisco and Beijing. Around London, it’s known by the sobriquet “Knowledge Quarter,” as it’s home to names like OpenAI, Meta, Isomorphic Labs, Cusp AI, Wayne, Recursive, and, a little farther down the road, Synthesia and Anthropic. The European Technology Network (ETN) just moved into a glossy new office nearby, while University College London sits around the corner.
Mixed in with the new developments are trendy food spots like Hoppers and BAO. Hop a train from King’s Cross, and founders can be in Cambridge in 45 minutes to source talent or can be in Paris in two hours to strike a deal.
Who would have guessed that a little more than 20 years ago, this was one of the seediest areas in London?
“In the ’80s, crack and heroin made the area a major narcotics market,” Hussein Kanji, an investor at Hoxton Ventures, said, recalling syringes in tree trunks and gangs patrolling the streets. “In 1982, the local church was occupied by the English Collective of Prostitutes for 12 straight days.” Then, in the early 2000s, a real estate developer had a dream and, well, “now it is the AI hotbed of the United Kingdom,” Kanji said. “What a change.”
Around 18 months ago, his portfolio company BioCorteX moved from the neighborhood Holborn to the Jellicoe building in King’s Cross, hoping to be near the action. “Lots going on in London right now,” Nik Sharma, co-founder of BioCorteX, told me. “Lots of hyperscalers moving in.” That includes, reportedly, Jeff Bezos’ AI company Prometheus, which is also said to be in talks to move into the Jellicoe.
There are around 3,600 AI startups in London, which, together, have raised around $12.1 billion out of the $14.8 billion raised in the city since late July, according to Dealroom. Since the start of June, AI-related startups have leased more than 1 million square feet of office space in London, according to the real estate firm Knight Frank. With that, prime rents in King’s Cross have risen 18% over the past three years, Chris Dunn, a commercial insight associate at the firm, told me.
That percentage represents only the largest leases encompassing at least 10,000 square feet, like the ones OpenAI and Prometheus are signing. The shorter deals go for even more, he said, and now the vacancy rate for conventional office space is just 0.9%. “Demand has outstripped supply,” he continued.
Today, one of the big topics of the area is sovereignty. It was a wake-up call for many when Anthropic shut off access to Mythos and Fable this summer, leaving some in the ecosystem to conclude: “We’d better look after ourselves,” Saul Klein, co-founder of the VC firm Phoenix Court, told me.
Phoenix Court is located in the King’s Cross area and has three portfolio companies in the vicinity, including Olix (which just announced a $3.3 billion valuation), Early Health and CoMind. Robin Klein, co-founder of the firm, said the shutdown of Fable and Mythos access was a “small but sharp reminder that Europe can’t simply rent its AI capabilities and capacity; it needs to build and hold some of its own.” King’s Cross, he said, is where much of this building is actually happening.
“The bigger question,” he continued, “is whether the U.K. builds the infrastructure, compute, energy, capital, to make this self-reliance durable, rather than just hosting outposts of U.S. labs.”
Image Credits:Phoenix Court
Top founders want to stay
Simon Kohl, founder of Latent Labs, has offices in King’s Cross and San Francisco. The London office, at the moment, is growing faster, and he’s more bullish than ever on the ecosystem, he said. “The mood right now feels less like London trying to catch up and more like London becoming one of the default places to start a serious AI company,” he said.
Look around and you are likely to see Wayve testing its autonomous cars. Founded in 2017 by co-founder Alex Kendall, the unicorn is one of London’s biggest success stories.
“Ten years ago, building a frontier AI company from London felt like an unusual choice,” Kendall told me. “Now it feels like an obvious one.” Wayve moved into King’s Cross in 2018 looking for a space that could double as a garage — “a rare combination in Central London,” Kendall said. He has watched the ecosystem mature around him — and it’s now evident that a startup can stay in London, raise serious capital, hire world-class AI talent, and remain globally competitive, he said.
Down the street from Anthropic’s new 158,000-square-foot office is the AI agent builder Sierra and the AI video platform Synthesia.
Laura Gonzalez Florez, Synthesia’s chief of staff and head of people, says the company moved into its glossy new office building a year ago to accommodate its growing team. They were drawn to the area for the same reason as everyone else: “It’s very close to the airport … very close to where a lot of investors are,” she said.
Image Credits:Synthesia
Around two-thirds of Synthesia’s engineers are remote, Gonzalez Florez said, letting the company tap into an affordable, international, and diverse talent pool and helping it scale faster. “From London, we can hire and work, without any problem, people from anywhere, from Slovenia to Portugal,” she said.
Unsurprisingly, London’s AI boom is also causing a talent war.
U.K. AI job postings have skyrocketed in the past few years, per data from PwC. When Anthropic announced it moved into town earlier this year, it listed, for example, a salary range of £260,000 to £630,000 for a machine learning research engineer when the average salary in London for the same role is around £102,000. Some founders in the U.K., like those in Silicon Valley, are being forced to raise more and bigger rounds to keep up.
“The real test is whether more globally significant AI companies are founded, funded, and scaled from the U.K., while continuing to attract the world’s best talent to build them here,” Zain Ali, founder of the King’s Cross-based AI legal firm Centuro, told me. “If that continues to happen, King’s Cross won’t just be an AI hub. It’ll become one of the U.K.’s most important strategic assets.”
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Every step you take closes the doors that the attacker may open slightly, and when you combine everything, you would have a door to a series of locked gates.
Why Do I Need a Bastion Host?
When it comes to teams working with many servers, deploying a bastion host (jump box) may be a clean and effective way to solve the long-term problem. With this method, you only expose SSH to the bastion, and the other servers accept it only when it’s from the bastion’s internal IP. This centralizes logging and makes auditing access far simpler.
Using a virtual private network (VPN) and a bastion host together is perfectly fine – and many solutions use both: a safe way to access the private network via a VPN, followed by use of a bastion host to restrict which servers can be accessed. Some teams may decide to forgo the bastion because they don’t have the manpower to manage one, and so use a combination of a VPN and a set of firewall rules that still quite a bit lowers the exposure, but without the extra effort.
Mistakes Leading to Leaving Cloud Servers Open
The Mistakes That Cause Leaving Cloud Servers Open: Even the safest development teams may have slip-ups from time to time. One of the most frequent is leaving staged, or test servers with relaxed firewall rules equivalent to those of the production environment – hackers don’t concern themselves with which environment they first land on. Another frequent error is reusing the same SSH key on several servers and clients, causing one hacked laptop to compromise all servers that key has access to.
Another common human error is not removing or changing access when someone leaves the team, so stale credentials remain valid and accessible. At last, putting trust in the strategy of “security through obscurity” – meaning one thinks that setting up the unusual port or hiding the hostname from the public is actually sufficient security – creates a wrong impression of security. This is mostly true; in reality, modern-day attackers scan all ports anyway, and there is no way to hide from them.
System Administrators Guide to Secure Remote Access
Prohibit SSH password logins totally and depend exclusively on key-based authentication
Surely no one wants to type in the password every time; because of this, use only key-based authentication
Deter the user from logging in as root by default and instead use the sudo command to do root tasks
A firewall or security group rule can provide great help with IP address-based restrictions on SSH logins
For access that comes from untrusted sources or external networks, use a secure tunnel like a vpn or bastion host
Periodically change SSH keys and inspect access lists
Maintain records of login attempts and detect brute-force attacks as quickly as possible
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the principal means by which cloud servers suffer break-ins through remote access?
By far the biggest reason why this can happen is unauthorized password-based SSH logins that have been cracked by brute force. The scenario is most likely to develop where the administrator allows root login via password and leaves the default port open.
Sufficient security measures for the server via SSH keys: Do you think it is safe to rely only on key authentication?
It is true that SSH keys drastically decrease the danger of a successful brute-force attack. However, if there is only key authentication on the server, there are still risks – the server administrator can always enable root login or disable the IP-based login restrictions. So it is recommended to always have these three in the server configuration: disabled root login, restricted access to known IPs, and rotating the keys regularly as the main components of meaningful protection.
Is it really necessary to set up a separate VPN network while I am able to connect via SSH keys?
A VPN gives extra security by first encrypting your computer traffic before it reaches your network, where the SSH connection will be used. This is mostly important when working on untrusted networks – like public wi-fi – where there is a threat of a potential hacker in your local network looking at your data.
Bastion host vs VPN as methods of accessing the server?
The bastion host works by funneling SSH sessions from many users through a single, carefully monitored server point while the rest of the network (and mostly the servers) remains protected from the internet. At the same time, a vpn will fully encrypt the communication between the user and the corporate network or servers. The combination is very common among larger security teams as a part of the defense-in-depth principle.
How often should SSH keys be rotated?
The ideal period to change your SSH keys depends on the security practices of your organization, but generally a good practice is to change SSH keys between 90 and 180 days, or in the case that the user who had access with the key leaves or is no longer able to be contacted, such as when a team member leaves.
Why is only changing the port number for SSH enough to secure that port?
Changing the port reduces automated scanning noise in your logs but isn’t a real security control on its own — port scanners check all ports, so it should never replace key-based auth and firewall rules.
Every step you take closes the doors that the attacker may open slightly, and when you combine everything, you would have a door to a series of locked gates.
Why Do I Need a Bastion Host?
When it comes to teams working with many servers, deploying a bastion host (jump box) may be a clean and effective way to solve the long-term problem. With this method, you only expose SSH to the bastion, and the other servers accept it only when it’s from the bastion’s internal IP. This centralizes logging and makes auditing access far simpler.
Using a virtual private network (VPN) and a bastion host together is perfectly fine – and many solutions use both: a safe way to access the private network via a VPN, followed by use of a bastion host to restrict which servers can be accessed. Some teams may decide to forgo the bastion because they don’t have the manpower to manage one, and so use a combination of a VPN and a set of firewall rules that still quite a bit lowers the exposure, but without the extra effort.
Mistakes Leading to Leaving Cloud Servers Open
The Mistakes That Cause Leaving Cloud Servers Open: Even the safest development teams may have slip-ups from time to time. One of the most frequent is leaving staged, or test servers with relaxed firewall rules equivalent to those of the production environment – hackers don’t concern themselves with which environment they first land on. Another frequent error is reusing the same SSH key on several servers and clients, causing one hacked laptop to compromise all servers that key has access to.
Another common human error is not removing or changing access when someone leaves the team, so stale credentials remain valid and accessible. At last, putting trust in the strategy of “security through obscurity” – meaning one thinks that setting up the unusual port or hiding the hostname from the public is actually sufficient security – creates a wrong impression of security. This is mostly true; in reality, modern-day attackers scan all ports anyway, and there is no way to hide from them.
System Administrators Guide to Secure Remote Access
Prohibit SSH password logins totally and depend exclusively on key-based authentication
Surely no one wants to type in the password every time; because of this, use only key-based authentication
Deter the user from logging in as root by default and instead use the sudo command to do root tasks
A firewall or security group rule can provide great help with IP address-based restrictions on SSH logins
For access that comes from untrusted sources or external networks, use a secure tunnel like a vpn or bastion host
Periodically change SSH keys and inspect access lists
Maintain records of login attempts and detect brute-force attacks as quickly as possible
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the principal means by which cloud servers suffer break-ins through remote access?
By far the biggest reason why this can happen is unauthorized password-based SSH logins that have been cracked by brute force. The scenario is most likely to develop where the administrator allows root login via password and leaves the default port open.
Sufficient security measures for the server via SSH keys: Do you think it is safe to rely only on key authentication?
It is true that SSH keys drastically decrease the danger of a successful brute-force attack. However, if there is only key authentication on the server, there are still risks – the server administrator can always enable root login or disable the IP-based login restrictions. So it is recommended to always have these three in the server configuration: disabled root login, restricted access to known IPs, and rotating the keys regularly as the main components of meaningful protection.
Is it really necessary to set up a separate VPN network while I am able to connect via SSH keys?
A VPN gives extra security by first encrypting your computer traffic before it reaches your network, where the SSH connection will be used. This is mostly important when working on untrusted networks – like public wi-fi – where there is a threat of a potential hacker in your local network looking at your data.
Bastion host vs VPN as methods of accessing the server?
The bastion host works by funneling SSH sessions from many users through a single, carefully monitored server point while the rest of the network (and mostly the servers) remains protected from the internet. At the same time, a vpn will fully encrypt the communication between the user and the corporate network or servers. The combination is very common among larger security teams as a part of the defense-in-depth principle.
How often should SSH keys be rotated?
The ideal period to change your SSH keys depends on the security practices of your organization, but generally a good practice is to change SSH keys between 90 and 180 days, or in the case that the user who had access with the key leaves or is no longer able to be contacted, such as when a team member leaves.
Why is only changing the port number for SSH enough to secure that port?
Changing the port reduces automated scanning noise in your logs but isn’t a real security control on its own — port scanners check all ports, so it should never replace key-based auth and firewall rules.
#Secure #Remote #Access #Cloud #ServerCloud,remote access">How to Secure Remote Access to Your Cloud Server in 2026
Protection against unauthorized remote logins to your cloud server is a matter of SSH key-based authentication, a strict security policy on the firewall, two-factor authentication, and a secure communication channel – no individual component will give adequate protection by itself. The major risk point in breaches is not the server but the open door to remote login. To patch that vulnerability, you need a series of countermeasures, not a magical setting.
Why Remote Server Access Is a Common Attack Vector
Every cloud server exposes at least one remote access point – usually SSH on port 22 – and that port is scanned constantly by bots looking for weak credentials. Password-based login is the most common way a system can be attacked by brute force, and it is quite common with a standard setup that the system is left in a state where an admin/user of that system – “root user” – can log in directly by guessing the user ID and the password combination. Add in shared team credentials, forgotten firewall rules from old projects, and staging servers left publicly reachable, and it’s clear why misconfigured remote access – not zero-day exploits – is behind most cloud server compromises. The fix is simple, though you’ll need to do some setup yourself instead of trusting the default setting.
How to lock down SSH access in the right way
The best way to secure remote access is through a series of small improvements rather than one major overhaul. The following is a real working method:
Switch to SSH key authentication, then turn off password login completely in the same location: sshd_config. Keys are far harder to brute-force than passwords.
Disable root login over SSH and require a non-root user with sudo privileges instead; this is a security advantage that even without any change, one key compromising would limit the impact.
Change the default SSH port away from 22 to cut down on automated scanning noise (not a security measure on its own, but it reduces log clutter).
Restrict access by IP using your firewall or security group, allowing SSH only from known office or VPN IP ranges rather than the entire internet.
Add a VPN as a connection layer for anyone accessing servers from outside a trusted network – a VPN like Planet VPN’s free VPN service can encrypt the connection between a remote worker’s laptop and the server before SSH traffic ever leaves their device, which matters especially on public wi-fi or shared networks.
Every step you take closes the doors that the attacker may open slightly, and when you combine everything, you would have a door to a series of locked gates.
Why Do I Need a Bastion Host?
When it comes to teams working with many servers, deploying a bastion host (jump box) may be a clean and effective way to solve the long-term problem. With this method, you only expose SSH to the bastion, and the other servers accept it only when it’s from the bastion’s internal IP. This centralizes logging and makes auditing access far simpler.
Using a virtual private network (VPN) and a bastion host together is perfectly fine – and many solutions use both: a safe way to access the private network via a VPN, followed by use of a bastion host to restrict which servers can be accessed. Some teams may decide to forgo the bastion because they don’t have the manpower to manage one, and so use a combination of a VPN and a set of firewall rules that still quite a bit lowers the exposure, but without the extra effort.
Mistakes Leading to Leaving Cloud Servers Open
The Mistakes That Cause Leaving Cloud Servers Open: Even the safest development teams may have slip-ups from time to time. One of the most frequent is leaving staged, or test servers with relaxed firewall rules equivalent to those of the production environment – hackers don’t concern themselves with which environment they first land on. Another frequent error is reusing the same SSH key on several servers and clients, causing one hacked laptop to compromise all servers that key has access to.
Another common human error is not removing or changing access when someone leaves the team, so stale credentials remain valid and accessible. At last, putting trust in the strategy of “security through obscurity” – meaning one thinks that setting up the unusual port or hiding the hostname from the public is actually sufficient security – creates a wrong impression of security. This is mostly true; in reality, modern-day attackers scan all ports anyway, and there is no way to hide from them.
System Administrators Guide to Secure Remote Access
Prohibit SSH password logins totally and depend exclusively on key-based authentication
Surely no one wants to type in the password every time; because of this, use only key-based authentication
Deter the user from logging in as root by default and instead use the sudo command to do root tasks
A firewall or security group rule can provide great help with IP address-based restrictions on SSH logins
For access that comes from untrusted sources or external networks, use a secure tunnel like a vpn or bastion host
Periodically change SSH keys and inspect access lists
Maintain records of login attempts and detect brute-force attacks as quickly as possible
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the principal means by which cloud servers suffer break-ins through remote access?
By far the biggest reason why this can happen is unauthorized password-based SSH logins that have been cracked by brute force. The scenario is most likely to develop where the administrator allows root login via password and leaves the default port open.
Sufficient security measures for the server via SSH keys: Do you think it is safe to rely only on key authentication?
It is true that SSH keys drastically decrease the danger of a successful brute-force attack. However, if there is only key authentication on the server, there are still risks – the server administrator can always enable root login or disable the IP-based login restrictions. So it is recommended to always have these three in the server configuration: disabled root login, restricted access to known IPs, and rotating the keys regularly as the main components of meaningful protection.
Is it really necessary to set up a separate VPN network while I am able to connect via SSH keys?
A VPN gives extra security by first encrypting your computer traffic before it reaches your network, where the SSH connection will be used. This is mostly important when working on untrusted networks – like public wi-fi – where there is a threat of a potential hacker in your local network looking at your data.
Bastion host vs VPN as methods of accessing the server?
The bastion host works by funneling SSH sessions from many users through a single, carefully monitored server point while the rest of the network (and mostly the servers) remains protected from the internet. At the same time, a vpn will fully encrypt the communication between the user and the corporate network or servers. The combination is very common among larger security teams as a part of the defense-in-depth principle.
How often should SSH keys be rotated?
The ideal period to change your SSH keys depends on the security practices of your organization, but generally a good practice is to change SSH keys between 90 and 180 days, or in the case that the user who had access with the key leaves or is no longer able to be contacted, such as when a team member leaves.
Why is only changing the port number for SSH enough to secure that port?
Changing the port reduces automated scanning noise in your logs but isn’t a real security control on its own — port scanners check all ports, so it should never replace key-based auth and firewall rules.
Post Comment