×
Why the Epstein Files Are Reviving a Conspiracy Theory About Wayfair and Human Trafficking

Why the Epstein Files Are Reviving a Conspiracy Theory About Wayfair and Human Trafficking

In July 2020, a conspiracy theory about Wayfair took off on social media sites like Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook, alleging that the furniture company was part of a vast child sex trafficking scheme. The basic idea is that Wayfair was listing overpriced furniture on its website and allowed sex predators to actually purchase kids who had been abducted and force them into sex slavery. The theory has gained new attention in recent days for an entirely predictable reason. It turns out Jeffrey Epstein bought furniture from Wayfair.

The U.S. Department of Justice released over 3 million pages of previously unseen documents about Jeffrey Epstein on Jan. 30, partially meeting the legal requirements of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. DOJ says this is the last release, though it seems likely there could be litigation over files that are still being withheld and inappropriately redacted.

The newly released files have included the names of powerful people in the world of tech, entertainment, politics, and academia. They show that Epstein wasn’t shy about discussing some horrific topics, like when he thanked someone whose name has been redacted for a “torture video.” The seemingly vast criminal actions surrounding Epstein have confirmed that sometimes conspiracy theories turn out to be true. But what about the Wayfair theory?

What was Epstein buying from Wayfair?

One tweet that’s racked up over 18 million views includes a page from the Epstein files that shows the sex trafficker’s assistant paid for some furniture from Wayfair for more than $8,400 on June 28, 2018.

“Jeffrey Epstein’s assistant bought a single, unlabeled $8,453 dollar item from Wayfair,” the tweet reads.

But if you actually dig a bit deeper into the newly released files, you can see what was purchased. It wasn’t a single item. It was a large purchase of several items, including 8 “Polar 9-Light Bath Bar by Modern Forms,” which cost $499 each. There appears to be a cancellation request for the entire order sent on June 28, 2018, that includes a medicine cabinet, sconces, and 14 outdoor lights.

But it looks like only the polar bath bar was actually cancelled in an email from June 29, 2018, and a refund of over $4,000 was issued. There’s also an email from PayPal dated July 10, 2018, denying a billing dispute, presumably an attempt to get all of the money back. There are other emails that seem to indicate other items couldn’t be cancelled because they were being prepared for shipment or already shipped.

Woody Allen’s birthday gift

Woody Allen, a director famous for making classic films like Manhattan and Annie Hall, appears many times in the Epstein files. Some of those mentions include emails between Epstein’s assistants and Allen’s assistants because Epstein bought Allen some furniture for the director’s birthday.

One of the emails from Nov. 7, 2016 reads:

Hi Lauren! The chairs Jeffrey has purchased for Woody are to arrive his home on Thursday Nov. 10th…they will come Fed Ex…Fed Ex does not call prior to delivery…this will be 6 cartons with 2 chairs each! Do you think someone will be home to receive the chairs? I’m not sure how deliveries work at Woody’s home… thanks,

The response from Allen’s assistant reads: “Yes! His housekeeper, [redacted], or his chef Richard will be there to receive it.” 

They’re the kind of emails that don’t necessarily give off any red flags unless you’re willing to believe that all of the people surrounding Epstein, right down to the housekeepers and chefs, were also talking in code about things like chairs and FedEx deliveries. And while that’s not necessarily something that can be immediately discounted, it seems highly unlikely. If children were being trafficked in this specific instance, it seems like there would be more attention to detail than the receipt being managed by a housekeeper who happens to be around.

What about the other purchases?

Looking through the other purchases listed for Wayfair, there’s nothing else that immediately seems like it could be construed as anything but normal purchases. Epstein’s credit card statements show that he purchased things from Wayfair like a punching bag on Nov. 30, 2012, for $374, and something listed as:

GRENADA CHINA VESSEL

BORMA SINGLE HOLE BA

1.25 POP UP BATHROOM

That appears to be some kind of bathroom sink that cost $638. And it doesn’t look like something suspicious, as far as we can tell. Wealthy people have a tendency to buy a lot of furniture, given their multiple residences and need to fill their spaces with lots of things.

Reached for comment on Wednesday, Wayfair rejected the idea that it was in any way involved in Epstein’s crimes.

“Wayfair unequivocally rejects the false claims linking the company to Jeffrey Epstein or human trafficking of any kind, over any time period. There is no evidence supporting these allegations, which are rooted in long-debunked conspiracy theories,” a spokesperson for Wayfair told Gizmodo via email.

What about all the Ashley Furniture mentions in Epstein’s emails?

One TikToker points out that a search of the Epstein files listed at the DOJ website includes over 8,000 results for the word “furniture.” That TikTok user, nerdypinkpanda1, clearly misunderstands many of the documents she’s looking at, bringing up a Supreme Court case involving Ashley Furniture and anti-dumping laws. She even admits that she doesn’t know what anti-dumping laws are and seems to think it involves child trafficking somehow. She then points to the Epstein files and says, “The proof is in the pudding.”

In reality, the 2014 Supreme Court case was related to Ashley Furniture’s concern about duties paid relating to foreign furniture sold in the U.S. at below-market rates. A 2007 law sought to limit “dumping” by foreign companies that would drive down the cost of U.S. furniture. The TikToker clearly doesn’t understand anything about the files she presents on screen.

The mentions of Ashley Furniture that she flashes on screen appear to be mostly related to financial planning documents that aren’t solely about Epstein, but instead where he was included as someone who had money with Deutsche Bank. She points to a document that includes Epstein’s name among a long list of people and institutions with money being managed. Nothing in the document shows Epstein giving half a billion dollars to Ashley Furniture, as she claims. Instead, it shows various people and businesses that have money held by Deutsche Bank.

It’s not just the expensive furniture purchases that this woman finds suspicious. She also seems to think that it’s weird that there are small purchases from Ikea. “A lot of these are from Ikea, and they’re for less than $10. I’m just curious, what can you buy at Ikea that’s less than $10? I don’t go to Ikea, I’m just curious.” There are countless things to buy at Ikea for less than $10.

The most likely explanation for why there are so many mentions of furniture in the Epstein files is that we’re seeing a massive cache of emails that cover almost a decade, and many of those are marketing emails from various companies. There are also just a lot of marketing emails from Wayfair specifically.

On July 20, 2016, Epstein received an email that read, “Hi Customers, It’s been a year since you first joined Wayfair, so we’ve got a little surprise to help you celebrate.” The surprise is a 10% off promo code that other Wayfair customers receive in their inboxes.

Where did the Wayfair conspiracy theory actually come from?

The origin of the Wayfair conspiracy appears to have been a tweet from a random user in June 2020.  The tweet didn’t get much attention at the time, according to the 2025 paper “Some assembly required: Unpacking the content and spread of Wayfair conspiracy theory on Reddit and Twitter.” But once it was posted to the Reddit community r/conspiracy it took on a new life.

The theory combines two facts: That furniture was sometimes very expensive, and it often shared names with children who had gone missing. Or at least that was the claim.

The idea of elite pedophiles using coded messages to arrange child sex trafficking is older than 2020. Pizzagate emerged as a conspiracy theory in 2016 after powerful Democrats had their emails leaked by WikiLeaks in the lead-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

The Pizzagate conspiracy eventually evolved into the QAnon conspiracy theory of 2017, which started because someone claimed to be providing information from inside the federal government with a high-level security clearance. The theory hinges on the idea that Donald Trump is a savior to kids who have been trafficked by an elite cabal of sex perverts. And Trump, who had been described as Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend, was going to expose the cabal while also saving all the kids.

The Epstein files show elite conspiracy theories can be true, but probably not this one

The tricky thing about our current cultural moment is that we have proof that some of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the country were regularly communicating with the most infamous child sex trafficker in American history. It was a conspiracy to abuse hundreds, if not thousands, of girls over decades.

Conspiracy theories can be true. But there doesn’t appear to be any evidence that the furniture conspiracy theory about abusing kids is based in reality. Someone noticed that furniture is ridiculously expensive sometimes and concluded that it must be a vehicle for trafficking kids. But unless we get more information, there doesn’t seem to be any evidence that Wayfair or any other furniture company is involved in such heinous crimes. Furniture just costs a lot of money sometimes.



Source link
#Epstein #Files #Reviving #Conspiracy #Theory #Wayfair #Human #Trafficking


Yesterday, OpenAI released its latest voice model, GPT-Live-1. The company called it “a new generation of voice models for natural human-AI interaction.” The full-duplex model allows ChatGPT to talk and listen at the same time, giving the back-and-forth a more conversational flow. It’s designed to be smarter, faster, and more natural.

Sounds great! Let’s see how it handles the internet’s one-man voice model red team, TikToker @huskistaken (aka Husk), when he tests out its capabilities by giving the model something simple:

Ooh, so close. Husk gave ChatGPT the straightforward request to tell him how many times the letter E appears in the number “seventeen,” and the voice model managed to get halfway there by answering “two.” It then offered a very awkward sign-off when Husk ended the conversation. Maybe that’s a query that GPT-Live-2 will be able to handle.

To be fair, Husk isn’t really testing any of the new features that OpenAI highlighted with the release of its new model, which, by most accounts, seems like it’s more capable when it comes to things like live translation than previous iterations. But he is giving the model a very simple benchmarking test that, despite being OpenAI’s flagship voice model, it still failed spectacularly.

It seems OpenAI knows just how bad this looks, too. Jason Liu, a Developer Experience Engineer on OpenAI Codex, reposted the video with a very succinct, “FUCK.”

Husk’s made a habit of terrorizing OpenAI over its voice model for some time now, making viral videos out of how poorly it handles certain prompts. One of his videos—in which he tasks ChatGPT with setting a timer and watching it fail—made it all the way to CEO Sam Altman, who tried to laugh it off in a very “I’m not mad, please don’t put in the newspaper that I got mad” kinda way.

Husk is not alone in giving GPT-Live-1 the old stress test. Another user on X gave the model the “Strawberry” test, asking it to count the number of times the letter R appears in the word “strawberry.” It’s a classic, and one that most AI models can answer correctly by now (whether that’s because they really know there are 3 Rs or because they’ve been trained on how to respond to prevent embarrassment is another question), but GPT-Live-1 gets tripped up by it.

Another user noted a new annoyance that has arisen from the model’s full-duplex functionality: While the model now allows ChatGPT to say things like “mhm” and “yeah” while you talk to confirm it is listening, it apparently is incapable of simply shutting up and not doing that. It seems ChatGPT has built an interrupting machine. Just what we’ve all been waiting for.

READ MORE:

The Future Is Always Listening: OpenAI Says Its New Voice Assistant Is ‘One Step Closer to a Truly Accessible AGI’

OpenAI Is Tired of Seeing All Those Videos of People Clowning on Its Voice Mode

#OpenAI #Beat #TikTokerartifical intelligence,ChatGPT,OpenAI,voice model">OpenAI Just Can’t Beat This TikToker
                Yesterday, OpenAI released its latest voice model, GPT-Live-1. The company called it “a new generation of voice models for natural human-AI interaction.” The full-duplex model allows ChatGPT to talk and listen at the same time, giving the back-and-forth a more conversational flow. It’s designed to be smarter, faster, and more natural. Sounds great! Let’s see how it handles the internet’s one-man voice model red team, TikToker @huskistaken (aka Husk), when he tests out its capabilities by giving the model something simple:  Had to give the new voice model the classic test pic.twitter.com/fQYHbBRNuL — Husk (@huskirl) July 8, 2026  Ooh, so close. Husk gave ChatGPT the straightforward request to tell him how many times the letter E appears in the number “seventeen,” and the voice model managed to get halfway there by answering “two.” It then offered a very awkward sign-off when Husk ended the conversation. Maybe that’s a query that GPT-Live-2 will be able to handle.

 To be fair, Husk isn’t really testing any of the new features that OpenAI highlighted with the release of its new model, which, by most accounts, seems like it’s more capable when it comes to things like live translation than previous iterations. But he is giving the model a very simple benchmarking test that, despite being OpenAI’s flagship voice model, it still failed spectacularly.

 It seems OpenAI knows just how bad this looks, too. Jason Liu, a Developer Experience Engineer on OpenAI Codex, reposted the video with a very succinct, “FUCK.” Husk’s made a habit of terrorizing OpenAI over its voice model for some time now, making viral videos out of how poorly it handles certain prompts. One of his videos—in which he tasks ChatGPT with setting a timer and watching it fail—made it all the way to CEO Sam Altman, who tried to laugh it off in a very “I’m not mad, please don’t put in the newspaper that I got mad” kinda way.

 Husk is not alone in giving GPT-Live-1 the old stress test. Another user on X gave the model the “Strawberry” test, asking it to count the number of times the letter R appears in the word “strawberry.” It’s a classic, and one that most AI models can answer correctly by now (whether that’s because they really know there are 3 Rs or because they’ve been trained on how to respond to prevent embarrassment is another question), but GPT-Live-1 gets tripped up by it.  OpenAI’s brand new voice model vs counting the r’s in strawberry. I really tried to help it along. pic.twitter.com/Pm0RfLyxIA — Himelstech (@himelstech) July 9, 2026  Another user noted a new annoyance that has arisen from the model’s full-duplex functionality: While the model now allows ChatGPT to say things like “mhm” and “yeah” while you talk to confirm it is listening, it apparently is incapable of simply shutting up and not doing that. It seems ChatGPT has built an interrupting machine. Just what we’ve all been waiting for. READ MORE: The Future Is Always Listening: OpenAI Says Its New Voice Assistant Is ‘One Step Closer to a Truly Accessible AGI’ OpenAI Is Tired of Seeing All Those Videos of People Clowning on Its Voice Mode      #OpenAI #Beat #TikTokerartifical intelligence,ChatGPT,OpenAI,voice model

called it “a new generation of voice models for natural human-AI interaction.” The full-duplex model allows ChatGPT to talk and listen at the same time, giving the back-and-forth a more conversational flow. It’s designed to be smarter, faster, and more natural.

Sounds great! Let’s see how it handles the internet’s one-man voice model red team, TikToker @huskistaken (aka Husk), when he tests out its capabilities by giving the model something simple:

Ooh, so close. Husk gave ChatGPT the straightforward request to tell him how many times the letter E appears in the number “seventeen,” and the voice model managed to get halfway there by answering “two.” It then offered a very awkward sign-off when Husk ended the conversation. Maybe that’s a query that GPT-Live-2 will be able to handle.

To be fair, Husk isn’t really testing any of the new features that OpenAI highlighted with the release of its new model, which, by most accounts, seems like it’s more capable when it comes to things like live translation than previous iterations. But he is giving the model a very simple benchmarking test that, despite being OpenAI’s flagship voice model, it still failed spectacularly.

It seems OpenAI knows just how bad this looks, too. Jason Liu, a Developer Experience Engineer on OpenAI Codex, reposted the video with a very succinct, “FUCK.”

Husk’s made a habit of terrorizing OpenAI over its voice model for some time now, making viral videos out of how poorly it handles certain prompts. One of his videos—in which he tasks ChatGPT with setting a timer and watching it fail—made it all the way to CEO Sam Altman, who tried to laugh it off in a very “I’m not mad, please don’t put in the newspaper that I got mad” kinda way.

Husk is not alone in giving GPT-Live-1 the old stress test. Another user on X gave the model the “Strawberry” test, asking it to count the number of times the letter R appears in the word “strawberry.” It’s a classic, and one that most AI models can answer correctly by now (whether that’s because they really know there are 3 Rs or because they’ve been trained on how to respond to prevent embarrassment is another question), but GPT-Live-1 gets tripped up by it.

Another user noted a new annoyance that has arisen from the model’s full-duplex functionality: While the model now allows ChatGPT to say things like “mhm” and “yeah” while you talk to confirm it is listening, it apparently is incapable of simply shutting up and not doing that. It seems ChatGPT has built an interrupting machine. Just what we’ve all been waiting for.

READ MORE:

The Future Is Always Listening: OpenAI Says Its New Voice Assistant Is ‘One Step Closer to a Truly Accessible AGI’

OpenAI Is Tired of Seeing All Those Videos of People Clowning on Its Voice Mode

#OpenAI #Beat #TikTokerartifical intelligence,ChatGPT,OpenAI,voice model">OpenAI Just Can’t Beat This TikTokerOpenAI Just Can’t Beat This TikToker
                Yesterday, OpenAI released its latest voice model, GPT-Live-1. The company called it “a new generation of voice models for natural human-AI interaction.” The full-duplex model allows ChatGPT to talk and listen at the same time, giving the back-and-forth a more conversational flow. It’s designed to be smarter, faster, and more natural. Sounds great! Let’s see how it handles the internet’s one-man voice model red team, TikToker @huskistaken (aka Husk), when he tests out its capabilities by giving the model something simple:  Had to give the new voice model the classic test pic.twitter.com/fQYHbBRNuL — Husk (@huskirl) July 8, 2026  Ooh, so close. Husk gave ChatGPT the straightforward request to tell him how many times the letter E appears in the number “seventeen,” and the voice model managed to get halfway there by answering “two.” It then offered a very awkward sign-off when Husk ended the conversation. Maybe that’s a query that GPT-Live-2 will be able to handle.

 To be fair, Husk isn’t really testing any of the new features that OpenAI highlighted with the release of its new model, which, by most accounts, seems like it’s more capable when it comes to things like live translation than previous iterations. But he is giving the model a very simple benchmarking test that, despite being OpenAI’s flagship voice model, it still failed spectacularly.

 It seems OpenAI knows just how bad this looks, too. Jason Liu, a Developer Experience Engineer on OpenAI Codex, reposted the video with a very succinct, “FUCK.” Husk’s made a habit of terrorizing OpenAI over its voice model for some time now, making viral videos out of how poorly it handles certain prompts. One of his videos—in which he tasks ChatGPT with setting a timer and watching it fail—made it all the way to CEO Sam Altman, who tried to laugh it off in a very “I’m not mad, please don’t put in the newspaper that I got mad” kinda way.

 Husk is not alone in giving GPT-Live-1 the old stress test. Another user on X gave the model the “Strawberry” test, asking it to count the number of times the letter R appears in the word “strawberry.” It’s a classic, and one that most AI models can answer correctly by now (whether that’s because they really know there are 3 Rs or because they’ve been trained on how to respond to prevent embarrassment is another question), but GPT-Live-1 gets tripped up by it.  OpenAI’s brand new voice model vs counting the r’s in strawberry. I really tried to help it along. pic.twitter.com/Pm0RfLyxIA — Himelstech (@himelstech) July 9, 2026  Another user noted a new annoyance that has arisen from the model’s full-duplex functionality: While the model now allows ChatGPT to say things like “mhm” and “yeah” while you talk to confirm it is listening, it apparently is incapable of simply shutting up and not doing that. It seems ChatGPT has built an interrupting machine. Just what we’ve all been waiting for. READ MORE: The Future Is Always Listening: OpenAI Says Its New Voice Assistant Is ‘One Step Closer to a Truly Accessible AGI’ OpenAI Is Tired of Seeing All Those Videos of People Clowning on Its Voice Mode      #OpenAI #Beat #TikTokerartifical intelligence,ChatGPT,OpenAI,voice model

Yesterday, OpenAI released its latest voice model, GPT-Live-1. The company called it “a new generation of voice models for natural human-AI interaction.” The full-duplex model allows ChatGPT to talk and listen at the same time, giving the back-and-forth a more conversational flow. It’s designed to be smarter, faster, and more natural.

Sounds great! Let’s see how it handles the internet’s one-man voice model red team, TikToker @huskistaken (aka Husk), when he tests out its capabilities by giving the model something simple:

Ooh, so close. Husk gave ChatGPT the straightforward request to tell him how many times the letter E appears in the number “seventeen,” and the voice model managed to get halfway there by answering “two.” It then offered a very awkward sign-off when Husk ended the conversation. Maybe that’s a query that GPT-Live-2 will be able to handle.

To be fair, Husk isn’t really testing any of the new features that OpenAI highlighted with the release of its new model, which, by most accounts, seems like it’s more capable when it comes to things like live translation than previous iterations. But he is giving the model a very simple benchmarking test that, despite being OpenAI’s flagship voice model, it still failed spectacularly.

It seems OpenAI knows just how bad this looks, too. Jason Liu, a Developer Experience Engineer on OpenAI Codex, reposted the video with a very succinct, “FUCK.”

Husk’s made a habit of terrorizing OpenAI over its voice model for some time now, making viral videos out of how poorly it handles certain prompts. One of his videos—in which he tasks ChatGPT with setting a timer and watching it fail—made it all the way to CEO Sam Altman, who tried to laugh it off in a very “I’m not mad, please don’t put in the newspaper that I got mad” kinda way.

Husk is not alone in giving GPT-Live-1 the old stress test. Another user on X gave the model the “Strawberry” test, asking it to count the number of times the letter R appears in the word “strawberry.” It’s a classic, and one that most AI models can answer correctly by now (whether that’s because they really know there are 3 Rs or because they’ve been trained on how to respond to prevent embarrassment is another question), but GPT-Live-1 gets tripped up by it.

Another user noted a new annoyance that has arisen from the model’s full-duplex functionality: While the model now allows ChatGPT to say things like “mhm” and “yeah” while you talk to confirm it is listening, it apparently is incapable of simply shutting up and not doing that. It seems ChatGPT has built an interrupting machine. Just what we’ve all been waiting for.

READ MORE:

The Future Is Always Listening: OpenAI Says Its New Voice Assistant Is ‘One Step Closer to a Truly Accessible AGI’

OpenAI Is Tired of Seeing All Those Videos of People Clowning on Its Voice Mode

#OpenAI #Beat #TikTokerartifical intelligence,ChatGPT,OpenAI,voice model

Friendly home robots have been the dream of sci-fi for a long time. Docile, helpful machines that do your laundry, take out the trash, maybe make dinner, and clean up afterward too. But if robots are going to do all that, they’re going to need some hands to make all that happen.

1X, a Norwegian-American robotics company, today revealed details about the five-finger hands attached to its soft, helpful robot companion, Neo.

The hands are built with actuators designed to replicate how tendons in the arms move human hands. 1X says this gives Neo’s hands 25 degrees of freedom of movement, which is just a little less than the 27 degrees of freedom human hands usually have. Cameras and AI smarts help sort out the broader context of what the fingers are trying to grab. It’s a dexterous mix that gives the Neo bot a very broad range of motion. 1X says the hands can grip odd shapes and detect when something is slipping out of its grip. The fingers can also move extremely quickly and hyperextend in directions human digits can’t. They also have an IP68 waterproof rating, meaning the robot can wash its own hands.

Courtesy of 1X

It’s a range that the engineers have aimed to dial in to align with what a human can actually do. Jonathan Terfurth, 1X’s director of actuators and hands, says the range of motion might even be better than a human’s, enabling it to open doors, lift heavy objects, and even plug itself in when its battery starts to die.

“You want to be able to operate with a human who has never worked or interfaced with a robot, and you still want it to be safe and compliant and soft,” Terfurth says. “Range of motion can be a bit extreme, but we try to be very close to what humans can do so that we can live in the world.”

Together, this is part of a growing ChatGPT-esque moment for robotics, where bots have gone from clumsy claw machines to capable handlers, able to gently carry fragile objects and become increasingly helpful for managing menial daily tasks and boring office chores.

The humanoid robot market tends to be dominated by tough, hulking Terminators meant to be paraded out for some defense industry contract or another. 1X is taking a different tack for its robot. The Neo is a soft, supple robot wrapped in a 3D lattice shell. Its design is inspired by characters like Baymax, the affable robot from the Disney movie Big Hero 6. In limited quantities, early access pricing is $20,000 or $500 per month to have it in your home, though the lump sum will prioritize delivery for 2026.

#Neo #Robot #Freaky #Fast #Fingersrobots,robotics,artificial intelligence">The 1X Neo Robot Has Freaky Fast FingersFriendly home robots have been the dream of sci-fi for a long time. Docile, helpful machines that do your laundry, take out the trash, maybe make dinner, and clean up afterward too. But if robots are going to do all that, they’re going to need some hands to make all that happen.1X, a Norwegian-American robotics company, today revealed details about the five-finger hands attached to its soft, helpful robot companion, Neo.The hands are built with actuators designed to replicate how tendons in the arms move human hands. 1X says this gives Neo’s hands 25 degrees of freedom of movement, which is just a little less than the 27 degrees of freedom human hands usually have. Cameras and AI smarts help sort out the broader context of what the fingers are trying to grab. It’s a dexterous mix that gives the Neo bot a very broad range of motion. 1X says the hands can grip odd shapes and detect when something is slipping out of its grip. The fingers can also move extremely quickly and hyperextend in directions human digits can’t. They also have an IP68 waterproof rating, meaning the robot can wash its own hands.Courtesy of 1XIt’s a range that the engineers have aimed to dial in to align with what a human can actually do. Jonathan Terfurth, 1X’s director of actuators and hands, says the range of motion might even be better than a human’s, enabling it to open doors, lift heavy objects, and even plug itself in when its battery starts to die.“You want to be able to operate with a human who has never worked or interfaced with a robot, and you still want it to be safe and compliant and soft,” Terfurth says. “Range of motion can be a bit extreme, but we try to be very close to what humans can do so that we can live in the world.”Together, this is part of a growing ChatGPT-esque moment for robotics, where bots have gone from clumsy claw machines to capable handlers, able to gently carry fragile objects and become increasingly helpful for managing menial daily tasks and boring office chores.The humanoid robot market tends to be dominated by tough, hulking Terminators meant to be paraded out for some defense industry contract or another. 1X is taking a different tack for its robot. The Neo is a soft, supple robot wrapped in a 3D lattice shell. Its design is inspired by characters like Baymax, the affable robot from the Disney movie Big Hero 6. In limited quantities, early access pricing is ,000 or 0 per month to have it in your home, though the lump sum will prioritize delivery for 2026.#Neo #Robot #Freaky #Fast #Fingersrobots,robotics,artificial intelligence

ChatGPT-esque moment for robotics, where bots have gone from clumsy claw machines to capable handlers, able to gently carry fragile objects and become increasingly helpful for managing menial daily tasks and boring office chores.

The humanoid robot market tends to be dominated by tough, hulking Terminators meant to be paraded out for some defense industry contract or another. 1X is taking a different tack for its robot. The Neo is a soft, supple robot wrapped in a 3D lattice shell. Its design is inspired by characters like Baymax, the affable robot from the Disney movie Big Hero 6. In limited quantities, early access pricing is $20,000 or $500 per month to have it in your home, though the lump sum will prioritize delivery for 2026.

#Neo #Robot #Freaky #Fast #Fingersrobots,robotics,artificial intelligence">The 1X Neo Robot Has Freaky Fast Fingers

Friendly home robots have been the dream of sci-fi for a long time. Docile, helpful machines that do your laundry, take out the trash, maybe make dinner, and clean up afterward too. But if robots are going to do all that, they’re going to need some hands to make all that happen.

1X, a Norwegian-American robotics company, today revealed details about the five-finger hands attached to its soft, helpful robot companion, Neo.

The hands are built with actuators designed to replicate how tendons in the arms move human hands. 1X says this gives Neo’s hands 25 degrees of freedom of movement, which is just a little less than the 27 degrees of freedom human hands usually have. Cameras and AI smarts help sort out the broader context of what the fingers are trying to grab. It’s a dexterous mix that gives the Neo bot a very broad range of motion. 1X says the hands can grip odd shapes and detect when something is slipping out of its grip. The fingers can also move extremely quickly and hyperextend in directions human digits can’t. They also have an IP68 waterproof rating, meaning the robot can wash its own hands.

Courtesy of 1X

It’s a range that the engineers have aimed to dial in to align with what a human can actually do. Jonathan Terfurth, 1X’s director of actuators and hands, says the range of motion might even be better than a human’s, enabling it to open doors, lift heavy objects, and even plug itself in when its battery starts to die.

“You want to be able to operate with a human who has never worked or interfaced with a robot, and you still want it to be safe and compliant and soft,” Terfurth says. “Range of motion can be a bit extreme, but we try to be very close to what humans can do so that we can live in the world.”

Together, this is part of a growing ChatGPT-esque moment for robotics, where bots have gone from clumsy claw machines to capable handlers, able to gently carry fragile objects and become increasingly helpful for managing menial daily tasks and boring office chores.

The humanoid robot market tends to be dominated by tough, hulking Terminators meant to be paraded out for some defense industry contract or another. 1X is taking a different tack for its robot. The Neo is a soft, supple robot wrapped in a 3D lattice shell. Its design is inspired by characters like Baymax, the affable robot from the Disney movie Big Hero 6. In limited quantities, early access pricing is $20,000 or $500 per month to have it in your home, though the lump sum will prioritize delivery for 2026.

#Neo #Robot #Freaky #Fast #Fingersrobots,robotics,artificial intelligence

Post Comment