×
Women’s March Madness: Breaking down the regions

Women’s March Madness: Breaking down the regions

With the final sixteen teams in the Women’s March Madness tournament decided, it’s time to leave home courts and head to neutral tournaments! The bracket will now be split into four different regions in two different locations: Fort Worth 1 and 3, and Sacramento 2 and 4. These regions will host the Sweet Sixteen and Elite Eight rounds before the winners from each region head to the Final Four in Phoenix the following week.

Let’s break down each region:

No. 1 UConn vs No. 4 North Carolina

While North Carolina battled through a close game against Maryland to book their trip to the Sweet Sixteen, UConn’s journey was… a little easier. The overall No. 1 seed Huskies beat No. 9 Syracuse 98-45 on Monday to advance to the Sweet Sixteen. Starting the game with a 31-0 run, the Huskies scored 65 points in the first half. They will head into the Sweet Sixteen as the favourites, with North Carolina having to pull off something spectacular in order to win this one.

No. 2 Vanderbilt vs No. 6 Notre Dame

While Notre Dame was definitely seeded a bit lower than their talent may suggest, their underdog win against Ohio State in the Round of 32 was a great achievement. The Fighting Irish have been up and down this season, but when Hannah Hidalgo is playing her best, you can’t count them out. They’ll be playing against a tough Vanderbilt team, which has another dynamic scorer on their side in Mikayla Blakes. This game will likely be more of a nail-biter than the other game in this region.

No. 1 Texas vs No. 5 Kentucky

Texas achieved a huge win against Oregon in the Round of 32, scoring 100 points. For a team that usually relies a bit more on defence, it was a huge offensive output for the Longhorns. They get to stay in their home state for the Sweet Sixteen and potentially the Elite Eight, which will help their momentum for sure. Kentucky is a younger team that is just growing, and their one-possession win over West Virginia is sure to boost confidence as they head into a game with a team as forceful as Texas.

No. 2 Michigan vs No. 3 Louisville

Michigan’s trio of super sophomores have been leading their team to new heights for two seasons now. It was the first time the Wolverines had hosted first-round games, and they delivered. Olivia Olson, Syla Swords and Mila Holloway led Michigan to a 92-63 win over NC State in the last round. Louisville had to grit its way past Alabama in a one-point victory to get to the Sweet Sixteen. This is another game to watch as we head into the next round.

No. 1 UCLA vs No. 4 Minnesota

Minnesota delivered one of the most memorable moments of the tournament so far when Amaya Battle made the buzzer-beater shot to win the Gophers their last game. In a packed Minnesota arena, the crowd erupted in celebration, which was incredible for the senior Battle, who is from the state. They now have their toughest ‘battle’ ahead of them, facing region No.1 UCLA. UCLA’s victories haven’t been by as big of margins as their fellow No. 1 seeds have been, so Minnesota may have some upset potential here.

One of the country’s best defenses versus one of the best offenses? You’ll want to be seated for this one. LSU’s star in Flau’Jae Johnson will want to extend her final March Madness as long as possible, and LSU sees a path to the Final Four for itself. Duke, on the other hand, had a slow start to the season but picked it up in the new year and went on to win the ACC Tournament. Their defence will need to be at 100% to stifle a quick and dynamic LSU team.

No. 1 South Carolina vs No. 4 Oklahoma

South Carolina has only lost three games this season. Two against Texas, and one against Oklahoma. Which makes this Sweet Sixteen match-up extremely interesting, to say the least. South Carolina had an incredible showing against USC, winning 101-61 against the Trojans, but Oklahoma has more size in the post than them, leading to a trickier matchup

No. 3 TCU vs No. 10 Virginia

Virginia caused the biggest upset of the tournament so far when they beat No. 2 Iowa in a thrilling double overtime victory in the Round of 32. It was truly such an entertaining showing, and a story like a No. 10 seed making it to the Sweet Sixteen is what March is all about. That confidence will give them a fighting chance against TCU, and it will be interesting to see if their Cinderella run can continue.

Source link
#Womens #March #Madness #Breaking #regions

Deadspin | Red Sox add veteran OF Jahmai Jones to mix in trade with Tigers  Detroit Tigers Jahmai Jones (18) looks out at the scoreboard during his game against the Chicago White Sox at Comerica Park in Detroit on Sunday, June 21, 2026.   The Boston Red Sox added a right-handed batter to their outfield platoon on Tuesday by acquiring Jahmai Jones from the Detroit Tigers for a player to be named later.  In a corresponding move, the Red Sox optioned outfielder Nate Eaton to Triple-A Worcester.  The Tigers designated Jones, 28, for assignment last Thursday after he batted .137 (13-for-95) with two home runs and seven RBIs in 57 games for Detroit this season.  Jones is a career .214 hitter with 10 homers and 41 RBIs in 198 regular-season games for the Los Angeles Angels (2020), Baltimore Orioles (2021), Milwaukee Brewers (2023), New York Yankees (2024) and Tigers (2025-26).  The Angels selected Jones in the second round of the 2015 MLB Draft.   He joins a Red Sox roster with left-handed-hitting Jarren Duran, Wilyer Abreu and Masataka Yoshida rotating through the lineup in the outfield and at designated hitter.  Eaton, 29, is 4-for-32 (.125) with one homer and five RBIs in 14 games for Boston this season. He is a career .221 hitter with three homers and 22 RBIs in 127 games for the Kansas City Royals (2022-23) and Red Sox (2025-present).  The right-handed hitter is batting .283 with five homers and 22 RBIs, a .348 on-base percentage and .450 slugging percentage in 48 games for Worcester this season.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Red #Sox #add #veteran #Jahmai #Jones #mix #trade #TigersDetroit Tigers Jahmai Jones (18) looks out at the scoreboard during his game against the Chicago White Sox at Comerica Park in Detroit on Sunday, June 21, 2026.

The Boston Red Sox added a right-handed batter to their outfield platoon on Tuesday by acquiring Jahmai Jones from the Detroit Tigers for a player to be named later.

In a corresponding move, the Red Sox optioned outfielder Nate Eaton to Triple-A Worcester.

The Tigers designated Jones, 28, for assignment last Thursday after he batted .137 (13-for-95) with two home runs and seven RBIs in 57 games for Detroit this season.

Jones is a career .214 hitter with 10 homers and 41 RBIs in 198 regular-season games for the Los Angeles Angels (2020), Baltimore Orioles (2021), Milwaukee Brewers (2023), New York Yankees (2024) and Tigers (2025-26).


The Angels selected Jones in the second round of the 2015 MLB Draft.

He joins a Red Sox roster with left-handed-hitting Jarren Duran, Wilyer Abreu and Masataka Yoshida rotating through the lineup in the outfield and at designated hitter.

Eaton, 29, is 4-for-32 (.125) with one homer and five RBIs in 14 games for Boston this season. He is a career .221 hitter with three homers and 22 RBIs in 127 games for the Kansas City Royals (2022-23) and Red Sox (2025-present).

The right-handed hitter is batting .283 with five homers and 22 RBIs, a .348 on-base percentage and .450 slugging percentage in 48 games for Worcester this season.

–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Red #Sox #add #veteran #Jahmai #Jones #mix #trade #Tigers">Deadspin | Red Sox add veteran OF Jahmai Jones to mix in trade with Tigers  Detroit Tigers Jahmai Jones (18) looks out at the scoreboard during his game against the Chicago White Sox at Comerica Park in Detroit on Sunday, June 21, 2026.   The Boston Red Sox added a right-handed batter to their outfield platoon on Tuesday by acquiring Jahmai Jones from the Detroit Tigers for a player to be named later.  In a corresponding move, the Red Sox optioned outfielder Nate Eaton to Triple-A Worcester.  The Tigers designated Jones, 28, for assignment last Thursday after he batted .137 (13-for-95) with two home runs and seven RBIs in 57 games for Detroit this season.  Jones is a career .214 hitter with 10 homers and 41 RBIs in 198 regular-season games for the Los Angeles Angels (2020), Baltimore Orioles (2021), Milwaukee Brewers (2023), New York Yankees (2024) and Tigers (2025-26).  The Angels selected Jones in the second round of the 2015 MLB Draft.   He joins a Red Sox roster with left-handed-hitting Jarren Duran, Wilyer Abreu and Masataka Yoshida rotating through the lineup in the outfield and at designated hitter.  Eaton, 29, is 4-for-32 (.125) with one homer and five RBIs in 14 games for Boston this season. He is a career .221 hitter with three homers and 22 RBIs in 127 games for the Kansas City Royals (2022-23) and Red Sox (2025-present).  The right-handed hitter is batting .283 with five homers and 22 RBIs, a .348 on-base percentage and .450 slugging percentage in 48 games for Worcester this season.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Red #Sox #add #veteran #Jahmai #Jones #mix #trade #Tigers

Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season">NFL starting QBs ranked by analytics before 2026 season  Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.  #NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season

ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season">NFL starting QBs ranked by analytics before 2026 season

Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season

Post Comment