×
WSL 2025-26: Leader Manchester City shocked by Brighton in Women’s Super League  Manchester City’s title party plans suffered a setback as the Women’s Super League leader lost 3-2 at ​mid-table Brighton & Hove Albion on Saturday, delaying its likely coronation.City knew a ‌win – coupled with an Arsenal loss or draw at ​home to bottom side Leicester City on Wednesday – would ⁠secure a first league trophy since 2016, but Madison Haley struck twice either side of Kiko Seike’s goal, as Brighton produced an upset.Andree Jeglertz’s ‌Man City remains on 49 points after 20 of 22 games, while second-placed Chelsea has 40 points from 19 matches. ‌Arsenal, in third, has 38 but has played just 17 ‌games.“I’m ⁠not worried,” Jeglertz said.“I am fully sure that when ⁠we are back again in training, we are fully focusing on Liverpool next (on May 3). Of course, we are following all the results. It’s still in our ​hands, and we are going ‌to do everything we can to finish it off with two wins. That’s our focus,” he added.ALSO READ | Barcelona Femeni wins Spanish top flight for seventh consecutive timeMan City got off to a strong start, and Kerolin put it on the scoresheet in the fifth ‌minute when Brighton failed to deal with a cross, and ​the Brazil forward curled a shot over goalkeeper Chiamaka Nnadozie into the top left corner.Man City was guilty of ⁠some wasteful finishing and paid the price when Haley struck her first goal against the run of play to draw Brighton level ‌in first-half injury time, latching onto a ball from Fran Kirby and firing into the bottom corner.Seike put the host ahead in the 47th when she sprinted down the right before unleashing a shot into the roof of the net.Haley completed her double in the 65th minute when she headed in the rebound after ‌her own shot before Khadija Shaw pulled one back for the visitor in the ​86th, her 19th goal this season, but Man City could not find the equaliser.“We didn’t make it easy for ourselves,” ⁠Kirby told        Sky Sports.“The first half we were, if I can ⁠be quite blunt, awful. We were lucky not to be three, four-nil down at one point. But we have the belief ‌in the squad. The second half was a really good performance from everyone. And yeah, we’re happy to keep the ​title race going for a little bit longer,” she added.Published on Apr 25, 2026  #WSL #Leader #Manchester #City #shocked #Brighton #Womens #Super #League

WSL 2025-26: Leader Manchester City shocked by Brighton in Women’s Super League

Manchester City’s title party plans suffered a setback as the Women’s Super League leader lost 3-2 at ​mid-table Brighton & Hove Albion on Saturday, delaying its likely coronation.

City knew a ‌win – coupled with an Arsenal loss or draw at ​home to bottom side Leicester City on Wednesday – would ⁠secure a first league trophy since 2016, but Madison Haley struck twice either side of Kiko Seike’s goal, as Brighton produced an upset.

Andree Jeglertz’s ‌Man City remains on 49 points after 20 of 22 games, while second-placed Chelsea has 40 points from 19 matches. ‌Arsenal, in third, has 38 but has played just 17 ‌games.

“I’m ⁠not worried,” Jeglertz said.

“I am fully sure that when ⁠we are back again in training, we are fully focusing on Liverpool next (on May 3). Of course, we are following all the results. It’s still in our ​hands, and we are going ‌to do everything we can to finish it off with two wins. That’s our focus,” he added.

ALSO READ | Barcelona Femeni wins Spanish top flight for seventh consecutive time

Man City got off to a strong start, and Kerolin put it on the scoresheet in the fifth ‌minute when Brighton failed to deal with a cross, and ​the Brazil forward curled a shot over goalkeeper Chiamaka Nnadozie into the top left corner.

Man City was guilty of ⁠some wasteful finishing and paid the price when Haley struck her first goal against the run of play to draw Brighton level ‌in first-half injury time, latching onto a ball from Fran Kirby and firing into the bottom corner.

Seike put the host ahead in the 47th when she sprinted down the right before unleashing a shot into the roof of the net.

Haley completed her double in the 65th minute when she headed in the rebound after ‌her own shot before Khadija Shaw pulled one back for the visitor in the ​86th, her 19th goal this season, but Man City could not find the equaliser.

“We didn’t make it easy for ourselves,” ⁠Kirby told Sky Sports.

“The first half we were, if I can ⁠be quite blunt, awful. We were lucky not to be three, four-nil down at one point. But we have the belief ‌in the squad. The second half was a really good performance from everyone. And yeah, we’re happy to keep the ​title race going for a little bit longer,” she added.

Published on Apr 25, 2026

#WSL #Leader #Manchester #City #shocked #Brighton #Womens #Super #League

Manchester City’s title party plans suffered a setback as the Women’s Super League leader lost 3-2 at ​mid-table Brighton & Hove Albion on Saturday, delaying its likely coronation.

City knew a ‌win – coupled with an Arsenal loss or draw at ​home to bottom side Leicester City on Wednesday – would ⁠secure a first league trophy since 2016, but Madison Haley struck twice either side of Kiko Seike’s goal, as Brighton produced an upset.

Andree Jeglertz’s ‌Man City remains on 49 points after 20 of 22 games, while second-placed Chelsea has 40 points from 19 matches. ‌Arsenal, in third, has 38 but has played just 17 ‌games.

“I’m ⁠not worried,” Jeglertz said.

“I am fully sure that when ⁠we are back again in training, we are fully focusing on Liverpool next (on May 3). Of course, we are following all the results. It’s still in our ​hands, and we are going ‌to do everything we can to finish it off with two wins. That’s our focus,” he added.

ALSO READ | Barcelona Femeni wins Spanish top flight for seventh consecutive time

Man City got off to a strong start, and Kerolin put it on the scoresheet in the fifth ‌minute when Brighton failed to deal with a cross, and ​the Brazil forward curled a shot over goalkeeper Chiamaka Nnadozie into the top left corner.

Man City was guilty of ⁠some wasteful finishing and paid the price when Haley struck her first goal against the run of play to draw Brighton level ‌in first-half injury time, latching onto a ball from Fran Kirby and firing into the bottom corner.

Seike put the host ahead in the 47th when she sprinted down the right before unleashing a shot into the roof of the net.

Haley completed her double in the 65th minute when she headed in the rebound after ‌her own shot before Khadija Shaw pulled one back for the visitor in the ​86th, her 19th goal this season, but Man City could not find the equaliser.

“We didn’t make it easy for ourselves,” ⁠Kirby told Sky Sports.

“The first half we were, if I can ⁠be quite blunt, awful. We were lucky not to be three, four-nil down at one point. But we have the belief ‌in the squad. The second half was a really good performance from everyone. And yeah, we’re happy to keep the ​title race going for a little bit longer,” she added.

Published on Apr 25, 2026

Source link
#WSL #Leader #Manchester #City #shocked #Brighton #Womens #Super #League

Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season">NFL starting QBs ranked by analytics before 2026 season  Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.  #NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season

ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season">NFL starting QBs ranked by analytics before 2026 season

Earlier this week ESPN released its QB rankings from a poll of coaches and scouts around football, which caused quite a stir. On the one hand it was a lesson in the disconnect between fans and people inside football, while on the other it was difficult to understand the rubric by which the people were judging. Now we’re diving into the fray to release our own QB rankings ahead of the 2026 season, judging every quarterback in six key areas required for success.

It’s important to understand the methodology before we dive into the rankings themselves, as well as the tiers that each QB belongs in.

How scores are factored: This is a cross-the-league evaluation of each quarterback vs. their peers. A score of five operates as the league average, with scores of 8-to-10 being significantly above league-average, and 1-to-3 being significantly below league average.

Known problems with this model: This scoring format naturally hurts quarterbacks with fewer starts in the NFL, because these numbers pull heavily from the 2025 season, with the tilt being evaluated based on career body of work. In reality, Cam Ward and Jaxson Dart should be higher in the rankings — but we just don’t have enough to tilt their rankings up. Similarly, Shedeur Sanders had one of the worst runs as a starter not just in 2025, but in NFL history. This gives him a lot more wiggle room to move up, but it can’t be reflected at this time.

If you’re feeling mad about these rankings, or think that they are wildly wrong — I get it. I’m a Panthers fan and think Bryce Young is better than 21st in the NFL, but this is just what the model shows. At the end of the day this is all about seeing where a QB is right now, and the beauty of football is that models are consistently thrown out the window as players surprise us, in good ways and bad, throughout the course of a season. We’ll obviously learn more when football begins once more.

#NFL #starting #QBs #ranked #analytics #season

TOSS

Bangladesh has won the toss and has opted to bowl first.

Playing XIs

Bangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon, Towhid Hridoy(c), Yasir Ali, Nurul Hasan(w), Mahedi Hasan, Mohammad Saifuddin, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Nahid Rana

Zimbabwe: Brian Bennett, Tadiwanashe Marumani, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Milton Shumba, Clive Madande(w), Tashinga Musekiwa, Brad Evans, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani

SQUADS

Bangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon(w), Towhid Hridoy(c), Nurul Hasan, Mosaddek Hossain, Mahedi Hasan, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Shoriful Islam, Nahid Rana, Yasir Ali, Mohammad Saifuddin, Rishad Hossain, Abdul Gaffar Saqlain

Zimbabwe: Tadiwanashe Marumani(w), Brian Bennett, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Clive Madande, Brad Evans, Wellington Masakadza, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani, Newman Nyamhuri, Ben Curran, Milton Shumba, Tashinga Musekiwa, Tinotenda Maposa

Published on Jul 15, 2026

#BAN #ZIM #live #score #1st #T20I #Ngarava #removes #openers #Bangladesh">BAN vs ZIM live score, 1st T20I: Ngarava removes openers; Bangladesh 30/2 (4)  TOSSBangladesh has won the toss and has opted to bowl first.Playing XIsBangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon, Towhid Hridoy(c), Yasir Ali, Nurul Hasan(w), Mahedi Hasan, Mohammad Saifuddin, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Nahid RanaZimbabwe: Brian Bennett, Tadiwanashe Marumani, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Milton Shumba, Clive Madande(w), Tashinga Musekiwa, Brad Evans, Richard Ngarava, Blessing MuzarabaniSQUADSBangladesh: Tanzid Hasan Tamim, Saif Hassan, Parvez Hossain Emon(w), Towhid Hridoy(c), Nurul Hasan, Mosaddek Hossain, Mahedi Hasan, Nasum Ahmed, Taskin Ahmed, Shoriful Islam, Nahid Rana, Yasir Ali, Mohammad Saifuddin, Rishad Hossain, Abdul Gaffar SaqlainZimbabwe: Tadiwanashe Marumani(w), Brian Bennett, Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Clive Madande, Brad Evans, Wellington Masakadza, Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani, Newman Nyamhuri, Ben Curran, Milton Shumba, Tashinga Musekiwa, Tinotenda MaposaPublished on Jul 15, 2026  #BAN #ZIM #live #score #1st #T20I #Ngarava #removes #openers #Bangladesh

Post Comment