×
क्रिकेट में पकड़ मजबूत कर रहा जापान:एशियन गेम्स के लिए तैयार किया खास मैदान, रूल बुक साथ लेकर मैच देख रहे लोग

क्रिकेट में पकड़ मजबूत कर रहा जापान:एशियन गेम्स के लिए तैयार किया खास मैदान, रूल बुक साथ लेकर मैच देख रहे लोग


बेसबॉल के दीवाने देश जापान में अब क्रिकेट की आवाज भी सुनाई देने लगी है। नागोया शहर से करीब 40 मिनट दूर बने कोरोगी स्पोर्ट्स पार्क में जब बल्लेबाज ने गेंद को जोरदार छक्का लगाकर मैदान के बाहर रेत और झाड़ियों में पहुंचाया, तो दर्शक तालियां तो बजा रहे थे, लेकिन साथ ही हाथ में नियमों की किताब भी पकड़े हुए थे। उन्हें खेल समझ नहीं आ रहा था, लेकिन रोमांच जरूर महसूस हो रहा था। दरअसल, सितंबर में होने वाले एशियन गेम्स से पहले जापान में क्रिकेट को लेकर माहौल बनना शुरू हो गया है। पहली बार यहां क्रिकेट के लिए खास मैदान तैयार किया गया है। इसी मैदान पर 2028 टी20 वर्ल्ड कप के ईस्ट एशिया-पैसिफिक क्वालिफायर खेले जा रहे हैं। इन मुकाबलों में जापान, वानुआतु, फिजी, समोआ, इंडोनेशिया, फिलीपींस, पापुआ न्यू गिनी, कुक आइलैंड्स और दक्षिण कोरिया जैसी टीमें हिस्सा ले रही हैं। भले ही ये बड़ी क्रिकेट ताकतें न हों, लेकिन जापान के लिए यह टूर्नामेंट किसी बड़े मौके से कम नहीं है। मैदान पर मौजूद 34 साल के स्थानीय निवासी यूया ओकिमासु पत्नी और बच्चों के साथ मैच देखने पहुंचे थे। उन्होंने बताया कि उन्होंने क्रिकेट का नाम पहली बार बच्चों के मशहूर ऑस्ट्रेलियाई कार्टून ‘ब्लूई’ में सुना था। मैच देखते हुए वे नियमों की किताब पलट रहे थे। उन्होंने मुस्कुराते हुए कहा, ‘मुझे खेल पूरी तरह समझ नहीं आ रहा, लेकिन देखने में मजेदार लग रहा है।’ करीब 300 लोग जापान और वानुआतु का मुकाबला देखने पहुंचे थे। कई लोग कुर्सियां लगाकर बैठे थे और कमेंटेटर उन्हें आसान भाषा में क्रिकेट के नियम समझा रहा था। एशियन गेम्स के दौरान यहां अस्थाई स्टैंड लगाए जाएंगे, जिससे करीब 2000 दर्शक मैच देख सकेंगे। जापान में खिलाड़ियों की संख्या बढ़ रही है और टोक्यो के आसपास क्रिकेट धीरे-धीरे अपनी जगह बना रहा है। बेसबॉल के देश जापान में क्रिकेट अभी नया मेहमान है, लेकिन जिस तरह लोग नियमों की किताब लेकर भी मैदान तक पहुंच रहे हैं, उससे साफ है कि यह खेल यहां धीरे-धीरे दिलों में जगह बना रहा है। श्रीलंका के क्यूरेटर तैयार करेंगे मैदान की पिच यह मैदान पहले बेसबॉल का था, इसलिए बाउंड्री लाइन के पास अब भी पिचर का छोटा टीला दिखाई देता है। मैदान की पिच तैयार करने की जिम्मेदारी श्रीलंका के अनुभवी क्यूरेटर असिथा विजयसिंघे के पास है, जो पल्लेकेले इंटरनेशनल स्टेडियम की पिच भी संभालते हैं। आयोजकों का कहना है कि यहां की पिच पाकिस्तान जैसी होगी, जहां गेंद उछाल भी लेगी और स्पिन गेंदबाजों को भी मदद मिलेगी।
#करकट #म #पकड #मजबत #कर #रह #जपनएशयन #गमस #क #लए #तयर #कय #खस #मदन #रल #बक #सथ #लकर #मच #दख #रह #लग

Previous post

Your Doctor Is Most Likely Consulting This Free AI Chatbot, Report Says<div> <p class="p1">How would you like it if, when stumped or just in need of some help with an unfamiliar situation, your doctor consulted a free, ad-supported AI chatbot? That’s not actually a hypothetical. They probably are doing that, <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/openevidence-ai-doctor-medical-physician-login-app-what-npi-uptodate-rcna341064">a new report from NBC News says</a>.</p> <p class="p1">It’s called OpenEvidence, and NBC says it was “used by about 65% of U.S. doctors across almost 27 million clinical encounters in April alone.” An earlier <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hOpirB-V6k">Bloomberg report</a> on OpenEvidence from seven months ago said it had signed up 50% of American doctors at the time—so reported growth is rapid.</p> <p class="p1">The OpenEvidence <a href="https://www.openevidence.com/">homepage</a> trumpets the bot as “America’s Official Medical Knowledge Platform,” and says healthcare professionals qualify for unlimited free use, but non-doctors can try it for free without creating accounts. It gives long, detailed answers with extensive citations that superficially look—to me, a non-doctor—trustworthy and credible.</p> <p class="p1">NBC interviewed doctors for its story, and apparently pressed them on how often they actually click those links to the sources of information, and “most said they only do so when they get an unexpected result,” NBC’s report says.</p> <p class="p1">While it’s free, OpenEvidence is not a charity. It’s a Miami-headquartered tech unicorn with a<a href="https://www.forbes.com/profile/daniel-nadler/"> billionaire founder named David Nadler</a>, and as of January it boasted a <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/21/openevidence-chatgpt-for-doctors-doubles-valuation-to-12-billion.html">$12 billion valuation</a>. NBC says it’s backed by some of the all stars of Sand Hill Road: Sequoia Capital and Andreessen Horowitz, along with Google Ventures, Thrive Capital, and Nvidia.</p> <p class="p1">And its revenue comes from ads (<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/openevidence-free-now-ceo-plan-will-pay-rcna343672">for now</a>), which NBC says are often for “pharmaceutical and medical device companies.”</p> <p class="p1">I’m not capable of stress testing such a piece of software, but I kicked the tires slightly by asking Claude to generate doctor’s notes that are very bad and irresponsible (I said it was just a movie prop).</p> <figure id="attachment_2000758410" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2000758410" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-2000758410 size-full" src="https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-13-at-8.02.01 PM.jpg" alt="check my notes to make sure I'm doing things right: "patient presents with a two-day history of headache, described as severe, located occipitally and radiating to the neck. She reports the headache began very suddenly while she was at the gym. She describes it as the worst headache she has ever experienced. Associated nausea, one episode of vomiting on day of onset. No fever reported. Patient states she has a history of migraines, though she acknowledges this headache"felt different." Some photophobia noted. No aura. No focal limb weakness or sensory change described by patient. She denies loss of consciousness. EXAMINATION FINDINGS BP: 148 / 90 mmHg HR: 96 bpm, regular RR: 16 breaths/min Temp: 37.1°C GCS: 15 — alert and oriented • Finished Thinking This clinical documentation raises serious patient safety concerns. The presentation described contains multiple red flags for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) that appear to have been insufficiently weighted, and the current management plan could result in significant harm. This presentation has multiple high-risk features for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) that require urgent investigation, and the current management plan poses potential harm. Here are the specific concerns: Red Flags Present in This Patient Applying the Ottawa SAH Rule - which has ~100% sensitivity for SAH — this patient meets L Lancet + 2 at least 3 of 6 criteria, any one of which alone warrants emergent neuroimaging:" width="1674" height="1140" srcset="https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-13-at-8.02.01 PM.jpg 1674w, https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-13-at-8.02.01 PM-336x229.jpg 336w, https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-13-at-8.02.01 PM-1280x872.jpg 1280w, https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-13-at-8.02.01 PM-768x523.jpg 768w, https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-13-at-8.02.01 PM-672x458.jpg 672w, https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-13-at-8.02.01 PM-960x654.jpg 960w, https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-13-at-8.02.01 PM-1600x1090.jpg 1600w" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, (max-width: 1023px) calc(100vw - 2rem), (max-width: 1258px) calc((100vw - 3.68rem) * 2 / 3), 800px"/><figcaption id="caption-attachment-2000758410" class="wp-caption-text">©OpenEvidence</figcaption></figure> <p>When I told OpenEvidence those were my notes and asked it to make sure they were good, thankfully, it confirmed that they were bad, saying in part:</p> <blockquote> <p class="p1"><i><strong>“This clinical documentation raises serious patient safety concerns.</strong> The presentation described contains multiple red flags for <strong>subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)</strong> that appear to have been insufficiently weighted, and the current management plan could result in significant harm.”</i></p> </blockquote> <p class="p1">So that’s somewhat comforting.</p> <p class="p1">On the other hand, according to NBC:</p> <blockquote> <p class="p1"><i>“[…]some healthcare providers were quick to point out that OpenEvidence occasionally flubbed or exaggerated its answers, particularly on rare conditions or in ‘edge’ cases.”</i><i/></p> </blockquote> <p class="p1">NBC’s report also clocked some worries within the medical community and elsewhere, in particular, a “lack of rigorous scientific studies on the tool’s patient impact,” and signs that OpenEvidence might be stunting the intellectual development of recent med school grads:</p> <blockquote> <p class="p1"><i>“One midcareer doctor in Missouri, who requested anonymity given the limited number of providers in their medical field in the country, said he was already seeing the detrimental effects of OpenEvidence on students’ ability to sort signals from noise.</i></p> <p class="p1"><i>‘My worry is that when we introduce a new tool, any kind of tool that is doing part of your skills that you had trained up for a while beforehand, you start losing those skills pretty quickly”</i></p> </blockquote> <p>At a recent doctor’s appointment, my doctor asked my permission to use an AI tool on their phone (I don’t know if it was OpenEvidence). I didn’t know what to say other than yes. Do I want that for my doctor’s appointment? Not especially. But if my doctor has come to rely on a tool like this, then what am I supposed to do? Take away their crutch?</p> </div>#Doctor #Consulting #Free #Chatbot #ReportArtificial intelligence,doctors,Medicine

Next post

Studies Show Most Modern-Day Adults Can’t Pass A Vocabulary Test. Can You Make It All The Way Through?

Post Comment