Indore News: ऑटो चालक और दर्जी निकले ड्रग्स सप्लायर, लाखों की एमडी के साथ पुलिस ने पकड़ा
इंदौर क्राइम ब्रांच ने शहर में अवैध नशे के कारोबार के खिलाफ एक बड़ी सफलता…
इंदौर क्राइम ब्रांच ने शहर में अवैध नशे के कारोबार के खिलाफ एक बड़ी सफलता…
"My relationships actually improved because I stopped showing up to things feeling resentful and exhausted."View…
Four-time champion Iga Swiatek will kick off her French Open campaign on Monday as first-round action continues at Roland Garros.
The third seed faces Australian wildcard Emerson Jones in the opening match on Court Philippe-Chatrier, before second seed Elena Rybakina takes on Slovenia’s Veronika Erjavec later in the day.
French Open Day 2 Order of Play
All times in IST.
Court Philippe-Chatrier
3.30 PM
Emerson Jones vs Iga Swiatek (3)
Veronika Erjavec vs Elena Rybakina (2)
Ugo Humbert (32) vs Adrian Mannarino
11.45 PM
Hugo Gaston vs Gael Monfils
Court Suzanne-Lenglen
2.30 PM
Arthur Rinderknech (22) vs Jurij Rodionov
Elina Svitolina (7) vs Anna Bondar
Sarah Rakotomanga vs Amanda Anisimova (6)
Daniel Merida Aguilar vs Ben Shelton (5)
Court Simonne-Mathieu
2.30 PM
Jasmine Paolini (13) vs Dayana Yastremska
Stan Wawrinka vs Jesper de Jong
Casper Ruud (15) vs Roman Safiullin
Anastasia Zakharova vs Karolina Muchova (10)
Court 14
2.30 PM
Alex de Minaur (8) vs Toby Samuel
Tatjana Maria vs Elise Mertens (23)
Kaitlin Quevedo vs Leolia Jeanjean
Flavio Cobolli (10) vs Andrea Pellegrino
Court 4
2.30 PM
Liudmila Samsonova (20) vs Jil Teichmann
Julia Grabher vs Rebecca Sramkova
Mariano Navone vs Jenson Brooksby
Francisco Cerundolo (25) vs Botic van de Zandschulp
Court 5
2.30 PM
Susan Bandecchi vs Cristina Bucsa (31)
Petra Marcinko vs Eva Lys
Emilio Nava vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Yibing Wu vs Marcos Giron
Court 6
2.30 PM
Pablo Carreno Busta vs Jiri Lehecka (12)
Thanasi Kokkinakis vs Terence Atmane
Jelena Ostapenko (29) vs Ella Seidel
Diana Shnaider (25) vs Renata Zarazua
Court 7
2.30 PM
Maja Chwalinska vs Qinwen Zheng
Eliot Spizzirri vs Frances Tiafoe (19)
Ignacio Buse vs Andrey Rublev (11)
Alycia Parks vs Leylah Fernandez (24)
Court 8
2.30 PM
Luca Van Assche vs Patrick Kypson
Jaume Munar vs Hubert Hurkacz
Akasha Urhobo vs Katie Boulter
Camila Osorio vs Ekaterina Alexandrova (14)
Court 9
2.30 PM
Daria Kasatkina vs Zeynep Sonmez
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Brandon Nakashima (31)
Panna Udvardy vs Viktorija Golubic
Raphael Collignon vs Aleksandar Vukic
Court 12
2.30 PM
Alexander Shevchenko vs Alex Michelsen
Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Rafael Jodar (27)
Talia Gibson vs Yulia Putintseva
Kamilla Rakhimova vs Jaqueline Cristian
Court 13
2.30 PM
Marton Fucsovics vs Matteo Berrettini
Maya Joint vs Anastasia Potapova (28)
Rinky Hijikata vs Tommy Paul (24)
Hanyu Guo vs McCartney Kessler
Published on May 25, 2026
Four-time champion Iga Swiatek will kick off her French Open campaign on Monday as first-round action continues at Roland Garros.
The third seed faces Australian wildcard Emerson Jones in the opening match on Court Philippe-Chatrier, before second seed Elena Rybakina takes on Slovenia’s Veronika Erjavec later in the day.
French Open Day 2 Order of Play
All times in IST.
Court Philippe-Chatrier
3.30 PM
Emerson Jones vs Iga Swiatek (3)
Veronika Erjavec vs Elena Rybakina (2)
Ugo Humbert (32) vs Adrian Mannarino
11.45 PM
Hugo Gaston vs Gael Monfils
Court Suzanne-Lenglen
2.30 PM
Arthur Rinderknech (22) vs Jurij Rodionov
Elina Svitolina (7) vs Anna Bondar
Sarah Rakotomanga vs Amanda Anisimova (6)
Daniel Merida Aguilar vs Ben Shelton (5)
Court Simonne-Mathieu
2.30 PM
Jasmine Paolini (13) vs Dayana Yastremska
Stan Wawrinka vs Jesper de Jong
Casper Ruud (15) vs Roman Safiullin
Anastasia Zakharova vs Karolina Muchova (10)
Court 14
2.30 PM
Alex de Minaur (8) vs Toby Samuel
Tatjana Maria vs Elise Mertens (23)
Kaitlin Quevedo vs Leolia Jeanjean
Flavio Cobolli (10) vs Andrea Pellegrino
Court 4
2.30 PM
Liudmila Samsonova (20) vs Jil Teichmann
Julia Grabher vs Rebecca Sramkova
Mariano Navone vs Jenson Brooksby
Francisco Cerundolo (25) vs Botic van de Zandschulp
Court 5
2.30 PM
Susan Bandecchi vs Cristina Bucsa (31)
Petra Marcinko vs Eva Lys
Emilio Nava vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Yibing Wu vs Marcos Giron
Court 6
2.30 PM
Pablo Carreno Busta vs Jiri Lehecka (12)
Thanasi Kokkinakis vs Terence Atmane
Jelena Ostapenko (29) vs Ella Seidel
Diana Shnaider (25) vs Renata Zarazua
Court 7
2.30 PM
Maja Chwalinska vs Qinwen Zheng
Eliot Spizzirri vs Frances Tiafoe (19)
Ignacio Buse vs Andrey Rublev (11)
Alycia Parks vs Leylah Fernandez (24)
Court 8
2.30 PM
Luca Van Assche vs Patrick Kypson
Jaume Munar vs Hubert Hurkacz
Akasha Urhobo vs Katie Boulter
Camila Osorio vs Ekaterina Alexandrova (14)
Court 9
2.30 PM
Daria Kasatkina vs Zeynep Sonmez
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Brandon Nakashima (31)
Panna Udvardy vs Viktorija Golubic
Raphael Collignon vs Aleksandar Vukic
Court 12
2.30 PM
Alexander Shevchenko vs Alex Michelsen
Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Rafael Jodar (27)
Talia Gibson vs Yulia Putintseva
Kamilla Rakhimova vs Jaqueline Cristian
Court 13
2.30 PM
Marton Fucsovics vs Matteo Berrettini
Maya Joint vs Anastasia Potapova (28)
Rinky Hijikata vs Tommy Paul (24)
Hanyu Guo vs McCartney Kessler
Published on May 25, 2026
Four-time champion Iga Swiatek will kick off her French Open campaign on Monday as first-round…
There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself:
What could be better than this?
Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps).
I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?
Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.
As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this.
YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.
If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support.
As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway.
This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.
That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.
![John Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTube
There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself: [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IQSvi3pXU[/embed] What could be better than this? Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps). I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?
Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.
As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this. YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.
If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support. As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway. This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.
That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to. #John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper John Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTube
There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself: [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IQSvi3pXU[/embed] What could be better than this? Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps). I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?
Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.
As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this. YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.
If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support. As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway. This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.
That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to. #John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper](https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/john-grisham-1280x853.jpg)
There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself:
What could be better than this?
Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps).
I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?
Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.
As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this.
YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.
If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support.
As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway.
This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.
That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.
There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You…
Seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton has firmly dismissed ongoing rumors regarding his imminent retirement from…
Lily Phillips is set to serve as one of fellow OnlyFans model Annie Knight’s bridesmaids.…
Nicolas Cage, who has one of the most diverse filmographies in Hollywood, shared which big-name…
नईदुनिया प्रतिनिधि, इंदौर। हनीट्रैप में क्राइम ब्रांच की एसआईटी ने सात आरोपियों को कोर्ट में…
IFC Films Roger Ebert refused…
जनगणना 2027 के पहले चरण में इंदौर नगर निगम सीमा में मकानों की गणना तेजी…