NASA and its international partners plan to deorbit the International Space Station at the end of 2030, sending it to a fiery death as it burns up in Earth’s atmosphere. But that doesn’t mean humanity will be giving up its sustained presence in low-Earth orbit.
The demise of the ISS will usher in a new era of commercial space stations. Several companies are already developing orbital research facilities and modular habitats that will allow astronauts to continue living and working in space. Many believe their stations will offer increased flexibility, affordability, and new opportunities for both scientific discovery and space-based industry.
Here are five key companies stepping up to fill the gap the ISS will leave behind.
1. Axiom Space
Axiom Space has received $140 million from NASA to develop Axiom Station through the agency’s LEO Destinations program. In February, the company raised an additional $350 million in private investor funds to accelerate the delivery of its ISS successor.
Construction of Axiom Station is already underway, according to Axiom’s website. The company’s partners at Thales Alenia Space—a global space manufacturer—are in the process of welding and machining the space station’s first module, and the first pieces of fabricated flight hardware are coming together. Axiom plans to launch that module to the ISS in 2027.
Docking the module to the ISS will allow Axiom to test and validate its systems in orbit before the module separates and rendezvous with the second module in orbit. After that, Axiom Station will be able to operate independently, but the company will still need to attach three more modules to fully build out the station’s living and research capabilities.
Once complete, the primary components of Axiom Station will be two habitat modules and a research and manufacturing module, but the company intends to add others too. One planned addition is the SEE-1 module, which Axiom is manufacturing for the British company Space Entertainment Enterprise. SEE-1 will serve as an entertainment venue—potentially the first one in space.
2. Vast Space
Axiom isn’t the only company targeting a 2027 launch for its space station. Vast Space is aiming to launch Haven-1 next year, too. Unlike Axiom, however, Vast’s space stations are designed to operate independently from day one.
The first, Haven-1, will be a standalone station capable of supporting a crew of up to four astronauts for short-duration research missions and commercial activities. It will primarily consist of crew quarters, a common area, and a laboratory that will serve as a microgravity research and manufacturing facility. In mid-January, Vast announced that Haven-1 had advanced to the first phase of integration and is on track to launch in the first quarter of 2027.
Haven-1 will be a stepping stone to Haven-2, which is designed to succeed the ISS. Vast plans to launch the first Haven-2 module in 2028, then add new modules every six months for a total of four by 2030. At that size, the space station will be able to support crews of up to eight astronauts. By 2032, Vast plans to expand the station to nine modules capable of supporting up to 12 astronauts.
Vast missed out on the first round of NASA’s LEO Destinations program, but it does have existing agreements with the agency and is vying for a contract in the second round. Earlier this month, the company announced that it has raised $500 million in private funding to accelerate the production of its Haven space stations.
3. Blue Origin and Sierra Space

These two aerospace companies have teamed up to lead the development of Orbital Reef, which Blue describes as a “mixed-use business park” 250 miles (400 kilometers) above Earth. The station will be designed to provide research, industrial, international, and commercial customers with space habitation, equipment accommodation, and even an onboard staff.
In its initial phase of deployment, Orbital Reef will consist of five modules. The primary modules will be the Core—a central hub with about a third of the habitable space of the ISS—a research module, and an expandable habitat module. It will be capable of supporting up to 10 crew members.
Orbital Reef has received $172 million from the LEO Destinations program on top of corporate investments. In April 2025, NASA announced that Orbital Reef completed a human-in-the-loop testing milestone, in which people performed day-in-the-life walkthroughs of life-sized mockups of major station components. This will inform design recommendations for the station.
Blue and Sierra plan to launch the first modules by 2027, though that seems optimistic given the fact that Orbital Reef is still in the design phase. It’s also unclear exactly how long it will take to scale the station to its final capacity.
4. Starlab Space LLC

Starlab Space LLC, a joint venture between Voyager Space and Airbus, is developing Starlab Space Station as part of the LEO Destinations program. In mid-February, the company announced that it had completed a critical NASA review, clearing the way to proceed with fabrication, testing, and assembly of its station.
Like Haven-1, Starlab Space Station will launch as an operationally independent system capable of supporting up to four astronauts. It will consist of a service module—providing propulsion, power, and systems support—and a habitat module that will be launched to orbit on a single flight set to take place in 2029.
The station will be equipped with both a laboratory designed to support a range of experiments and technology demonstrations in microgravity. The lab will be divided into two main sections: the Internal Payload Laboratory (IPL) and the External Payload Laboratory (EPL). The IPL will support biological studies, human studies, materials studies, and more, while the EPL will support the testing and operation of payloads.
5. Max Space

This Florida-based startup is the newcomer on the scene. Max Space unveiled its plans to develop Thunderbird Station in December 2025, though it first shared plans for inflatable space station modules back in 2024. The company did not compete for a Phase 1 award from the LEO Destinations program but now hopes to win a NASA contract in Phase 2.
Thunderbird is another small, single launch station capable of supporting up to four astronauts at a time. The design is based on Max Space’s inflatable habitat technology. Once in orbit, it will expand to a volume of more than 12,000 cubic feet (350 cubic meters)—the company claims it will be the most spacious space station ever built. The station will be equipped with payload lockers to support government and commercial missions as well as research equipment.
Max Space is targeting a 2029 launch, but it’s still too early to say whether the company is on track to hit that target. The company aims to launch its first in-orbit expandable habitat demonstration in the first quarter of 2027.
Earlier this month, Max Space announced a “multi-million-dollar” strategic investment from Voyager Technologies to “advance the development of next-generation expandable space habitats supporting sustained lunar operations and future deep-space missions,” but it’s unclear how much of that funding—if any—will go toward Thunderbird.
Source link
#Companies #Competing #Replace #International #Space #Station



![FCC Chairman Wants to Repeal a Key Rule That Would Fundamentally Change Broadcast News
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr wants to repeal a rule that has prevented a select handful of broadcasters from taking full control of the media landscape. Back in 2004, Congress instructed the FCC to enact a national ownership cap that would bar any one broadcast station owner from reaching more than 39% of American households. For more than 20 years, the rule has kept mega mergers in the TV broadcasting industry from gobbling up the entire media ecosystem. Now, Carr is proposing to repeal that national ownership cap rule, which, if successful, would mean broadcast TV giants will pretty much have a green light for mergers, even if it meant that one company would gain access to most of the media landscape. Carr expressed his intentions in an op-ed published by the far-right organization Breitbart. In the op-ed, he claimed that the cap was once helpful in protecting local news stations, but now it was becoming an obstacle as they compete with national news, large streamers, and social media giants.
Instead of a blanket rule, Carr wants to create a new “case-by-case approach.” “Previously, the cap operated as a blanket prohibition on any and all deals that would combine stations in excess of the 39 percent limit—regardless of whether it was a good deal or a bad one for the country,” Carr wrote in the op-ed. “Our new proposal would allow the FCC to approve deals that exceed the 39 percent cap, but only if doing so would promote the public interest.”
Major broadcasters have been lobbying for a change to the rule for quite some time now. One such mega TV broadcasting company that lobbied for the rule change is Nexstar. Earlier this year, the FCC granted Nexstar a waiver for the 39% national ownership cap rule and approved its acquisition of rival Tegna. The merger is still currently facing court challenges over antitrust claims, but if it is finalized, then Nexstar is estimated to expand its reach to at least 60% of American households. Sinclair, another Trump-allied major broadcaster that was behind a particularly infamous PR debacle during Trump’s first administration, is also eyeing a merger and commended the proposed rule change as “common sense.” Both companies also famously refused to air Jimmy Kimmel’s show on their channels late last year after the late-night host’s comments about Charlie Kirk drew ire from the Trump administration.
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo[/embed] The FCC will vote on eliminating the rule on August 6th. There are three commissioners, two Republicans and one Democrat. The lone Democratic FCC Commissioner, Anna Gomez, took to X to voice her staunch opposition. “The FCC just announced it will move forward with its unlawful effort to hand control of the public airwaves to billionaire buddies of this administration,” Gomez wrote. “This will destroy local newsrooms, silence community reporting, and drive-up costs for American families.” Even if the action passes the FCC vote, it’s likely to receive pushback from both sides of the aisle in Congress. “Trump’s FCC Chair is trying to illegally rewrite the rules to make it easier for billionaires to line their own pockets while jacking up costs and controlling what Americans watch,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren said in a statement. “After rubber-stamping the Nexstar-Tegna megamerger, this looks like the Trump administration’s latest attempt to roll out the red carpet for more antitrust disasters.”
Critics believe that because the rule was created following Congress’s action, it is up to Congress to determine if it should be retired. But Carr insists that the FCC has the authority to modify or repeal the rule. #FCC #Chairman #Repeal #Key #Rule #Fundamentally #Change #Broadcast #NewsBrendan carr,broadcast television,FCC FCC Chairman Wants to Repeal a Key Rule That Would Fundamentally Change Broadcast News
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr wants to repeal a rule that has prevented a select handful of broadcasters from taking full control of the media landscape. Back in 2004, Congress instructed the FCC to enact a national ownership cap that would bar any one broadcast station owner from reaching more than 39% of American households. For more than 20 years, the rule has kept mega mergers in the TV broadcasting industry from gobbling up the entire media ecosystem. Now, Carr is proposing to repeal that national ownership cap rule, which, if successful, would mean broadcast TV giants will pretty much have a green light for mergers, even if it meant that one company would gain access to most of the media landscape. Carr expressed his intentions in an op-ed published by the far-right organization Breitbart. In the op-ed, he claimed that the cap was once helpful in protecting local news stations, but now it was becoming an obstacle as they compete with national news, large streamers, and social media giants.
Instead of a blanket rule, Carr wants to create a new “case-by-case approach.” “Previously, the cap operated as a blanket prohibition on any and all deals that would combine stations in excess of the 39 percent limit—regardless of whether it was a good deal or a bad one for the country,” Carr wrote in the op-ed. “Our new proposal would allow the FCC to approve deals that exceed the 39 percent cap, but only if doing so would promote the public interest.”
Major broadcasters have been lobbying for a change to the rule for quite some time now. One such mega TV broadcasting company that lobbied for the rule change is Nexstar. Earlier this year, the FCC granted Nexstar a waiver for the 39% national ownership cap rule and approved its acquisition of rival Tegna. The merger is still currently facing court challenges over antitrust claims, but if it is finalized, then Nexstar is estimated to expand its reach to at least 60% of American households. Sinclair, another Trump-allied major broadcaster that was behind a particularly infamous PR debacle during Trump’s first administration, is also eyeing a merger and commended the proposed rule change as “common sense.” Both companies also famously refused to air Jimmy Kimmel’s show on their channels late last year after the late-night host’s comments about Charlie Kirk drew ire from the Trump administration.
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo[/embed] The FCC will vote on eliminating the rule on August 6th. There are three commissioners, two Republicans and one Democrat. The lone Democratic FCC Commissioner, Anna Gomez, took to X to voice her staunch opposition. “The FCC just announced it will move forward with its unlawful effort to hand control of the public airwaves to billionaire buddies of this administration,” Gomez wrote. “This will destroy local newsrooms, silence community reporting, and drive-up costs for American families.” Even if the action passes the FCC vote, it’s likely to receive pushback from both sides of the aisle in Congress. “Trump’s FCC Chair is trying to illegally rewrite the rules to make it easier for billionaires to line their own pockets while jacking up costs and controlling what Americans watch,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren said in a statement. “After rubber-stamping the Nexstar-Tegna megamerger, this looks like the Trump administration’s latest attempt to roll out the red carpet for more antitrust disasters.”
Critics believe that because the rule was created following Congress’s action, it is up to Congress to determine if it should be retired. But Carr insists that the FCC has the authority to modify or repeal the rule. #FCC #Chairman #Repeal #Key #Rule #Fundamentally #Change #Broadcast #NewsBrendan carr,broadcast television,FCC](https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/07/GettyImages-2262359639-1280x888.jpg)



Post Comment