×
What the NBA Draft Should Learn From the 2026 NFL Draft | Deadspin.com   The NFL turned its most popular off-season extravaganza into a golf tournament this week.Maybe they couldn’t hear it, but the silence on our end of the cable hook-up was deafening.I understand why golf fans want the world’s top players to pick up the pace. There’s only so much a broadcaster can say about a guy’s cool sunglasses on his excruciatingly long walk to a 350-yard drive.But a professional draft is different, especially when fans are as invested as they are in football. And basketball, for that matter.Thursday’s telecast of the NFL Draft’s first round had to make Bob Hayes proud. It flew by.Not coincidentally, it had to go down as a JaMarcus Russell – the worst of all-time, flawed in so many ways.But there’s good news: The NBA should have learned a whole lot in terms of What Not To Include in the script for its big night in June.Here are six suggestions.Say SomethingI found it interesting that some day-after critics of ABC’s telecast found it noteworthy that Nick Saban labeled one selection “not really a self-starter.”Wow. Scathing. Potentially libelous. Shocked he wasn’t dismissed from the panel immediately.OK, maybe not.That was the most controversial thing Saban said all night, the only utterance to which fired-up football fans in TV-land screamed back: “Yeah. You tell ‘em, Coach. The guy is fat and out of shape. Been saying that all season.”That’s why we gathered the gang, slipped on our 2025 Fantasy Football Champs t-shirts and poured the Mexican Coke. We didn’t come to hear “Go Wolverines” and “Go Buckeyes” from Saban’s sidekicks.A draft inspires debate. Half a team’s fan base has been calling talk radio for weeks demanding their scouting chops go regional. The other half has waited until day-after to let everyone know they heard it here first: Our pick blows.Yet all we heard on NFL Day 1 was how coachable the kid was and what a great fit he’d be.THIRTY-TWO TIMES.Give me …Ban CheerleadersIt all starts with the panel. Ernie Johnson is the perfect NBA host.Then you need book-end blowhards. The Republican and the Democrat, if you will.Stephen A. Smith is ideal. Informed, well spoken and, most importantly, loud.Then you need someone equally bull-headed, but ideally from a basketball background. I see him, but it would be bold – Draymond Green the player/analyst.In between, we only have Johnson … because I’m saving the fourth virtual seat for a real game-breaker. If you thought Green was out there … Stay tuned.“I Want to Thank …”The three biggest wastes of time on draft night are:“I wouldn’t be here without my mom.” (Every player interview.)“We’re so proud.” (Every parent interview.)“Can you describe your feelings?” (Every interviewer.)It reminds me – time and time and time again – of a roving baseball reporter in the stands chatting with a rookie outfielder’s family while a no-hitter is going on.Can we get back to the action?No interviews!“Jeopardy” Can WaitWhat’s the rush? We’ve tuned in to welcome (or trash) our new baby. Let’s spend the night together.Fifteen minutes between picks seems perfectly fine.There are two aspects of each pick that every fan of that team wants to hear experts dissect: The current state of the team (leading into who would be the ideal addition) and the snap-judgement fit/ramifications of the pick itself in the immediate aftermath of it having been made.Five minutes of the former and five minutes of the latter might not be enough time. OK, so how about six of each? It’s the best we can do.Throw in your three minutes of commercials and you have 15 minutes of absolute sports heaven sandwiching each pick. Times 30.Not eight (down from 10) like the NFL sped us through in its all-important Round 1.What’s Must-See TV Without a Celebrity?Sadly I must admit: Yes, you can have too much Stephen A. Smith. So let’s trump his and Draymond’s dueling haymakers with a “wow-inducing” local expert with something of substance to say about each pick.I’m talking Barack Obama living and dying with his beloved Bulls. Kevin Hart, Peyton Manning, Patrick Mahomes, David Letterman, Tiger Woods, Uma Thurman, Drake, Billy Crystal, Dianna Russini …You’ve now elevated your telecast to Academy Awards level. And the great thing about these ultimate attention-grabbers – every team has at least one – is they would kill to have their basketball expertise heard. You know, like real fans.Each joins the debate for his/her team via satellite, shoehorned into the six-minute lead-in and the six-minute critique. Tell me you wouldn’t tune in for that.It sure beats watching them actually try to play in a celebrity game.You Make The CallThirty teams with 15 minutes between picks. Give me a second … that’s 7 1/2 hours. Yikes.How in the world can we get people to stick around for Oklahoma City’s pick well around the clock has struck midnight?You gotta know I have an idea:Make the thing interactive. As soon as the screen flashes, “The Pick Is In,” you have one minute to text your prediction to 3447274554268 (DGIsBrilliant).Viewer with the most correct selections wins  million. You sleeping in the next day?To quote Kirk Herbstreit (for the one and only time): “I love it.”   #NBA #Draft #Learn #NFL #Draft #Deadspin.com

What the NBA Draft Should Learn From the 2026 NFL Draft | Deadspin.com

The NFL turned its most popular off-season extravaganza into a golf tournament this week.

Maybe they couldn’t hear it, but the silence on our end of the cable hook-up was deafening.

I understand why golf fans want the world’s top players to pick up the pace. There’s only so much a broadcaster can say about a guy’s cool sunglasses on his excruciatingly long walk to a 350-yard drive.

But a professional draft is different, especially when fans are as invested as they are in football. And basketball, for that matter.

Thursday’s telecast of the NFL Draft’s first round had to make Bob Hayes proud. It flew by.

Not coincidentally, it had to go down as a JaMarcus Russell – the worst of all-time, flawed in so many ways.

But there’s good news: The NBA should have learned a whole lot in terms of What Not To Include in the script for its big night in June.

Here are six suggestions.

Say Something

I found it interesting that some day-after critics of ABC’s telecast found it noteworthy that Nick Saban labeled one selection “not really a self-starter.”

Wow. Scathing. Potentially libelous. Shocked he wasn’t dismissed from the panel immediately.

OK, maybe not.

That was the most controversial thing Saban said all night, the only utterance to which fired-up football fans in TV-land screamed back: “Yeah. You tell ‘em, Coach. The guy is fat and out of shape. Been saying that all season.”

That’s why we gathered the gang, slipped on our 2025 Fantasy Football Champs t-shirts and poured the Mexican Coke. We didn’t come to hear “Go Wolverines” and “Go Buckeyes” from Saban’s sidekicks.

A draft inspires debate. Half a team’s fan base has been calling talk radio for weeks demanding their scouting chops go regional. The other half has waited until day-after to let everyone know they heard it here first: Our pick blows.

Yet all we heard on NFL Day 1 was how coachable the kid was and what a great fit he’d be.

THIRTY-TWO TIMES.

Give me …

Ban Cheerleaders

It all starts with the panel. Ernie Johnson is the perfect NBA host.

Then you need book-end blowhards. The Republican and the Democrat, if you will.

Stephen A. Smith is ideal. Informed, well spoken and, most importantly, loud.

Then you need someone equally bull-headed, but ideally from a basketball background. I see him, but it would be bold – Draymond Green the player/analyst.

In between, we only have Johnson … because I’m saving the fourth virtual seat for a real game-breaker. If you thought Green was out there … Stay tuned.

“I Want to Thank …”

The three biggest wastes of time on draft night are:

  • “I wouldn’t be here without my mom.” (Every player interview.)
  • “We’re so proud.” (Every parent interview.)
  • “Can you describe your feelings?” (Every interviewer.)

It reminds me – time and time and time again – of a roving baseball reporter in the stands chatting with a rookie outfielder’s family while a no-hitter is going on.

Can we get back to the action?

No interviews!

“Jeopardy” Can Wait

What’s the rush? We’ve tuned in to welcome (or trash) our new baby. Let’s spend the night together.

Fifteen minutes between picks seems perfectly fine.

There are two aspects of each pick that every fan of that team wants to hear experts dissect: The current state of the team (leading into who would be the ideal addition) and the snap-judgement fit/ramifications of the pick itself in the immediate aftermath of it having been made.

Five minutes of the former and five minutes of the latter might not be enough time. OK, so how about six of each? It’s the best we can do.

Throw in your three minutes of commercials and you have 15 minutes of absolute sports heaven sandwiching each pick. Times 30.

Not eight (down from 10) like the NFL sped us through in its all-important Round 1.

What’s Must-See TV Without a Celebrity?

Sadly I must admit: Yes, you can have too much Stephen A. Smith. So let’s trump his and Draymond’s dueling haymakers with a “wow-inducing” local expert with something of substance to say about each pick.

I’m talking Barack Obama living and dying with his beloved Bulls. Kevin Hart, Peyton Manning, Patrick Mahomes, David Letterman, Tiger Woods, Uma Thurman, Drake, Billy Crystal, Dianna Russini …

You’ve now elevated your telecast to Academy Awards level. And the great thing about these ultimate attention-grabbers – every team has at least one – is they would kill to have their basketball expertise heard. You know, like real fans.

Each joins the debate for his/her team via satellite, shoehorned into the six-minute lead-in and the six-minute critique. Tell me you wouldn’t tune in for that.

It sure beats watching them actually try to play in a celebrity game.

You Make The Call

Thirty teams with 15 minutes between picks. Give me a second … that’s 7 1/2 hours. Yikes.

How in the world can we get people to stick around for Oklahoma City’s pick well around the clock has struck midnight?

You gotta know I have an idea:

Make the thing interactive. As soon as the screen flashes, “The Pick Is In,” you have one minute to text your prediction to 3447274554268 (DGIsBrilliant).

Viewer with the most correct selections wins $1 million. You sleeping in the next day?

To quote Kirk Herbstreit (for the one and only time): “I love it.”

#NBA #Draft #Learn #NFL #Draft #Deadspin.com

The NFL turned its most popular off-season extravaganza into a golf tournament this week.

Maybe they couldn’t hear it, but the silence on our end of the cable hook-up was deafening.

I understand why golf fans want the world’s top players to pick up the pace. There’s only so much a broadcaster can say about a guy’s cool sunglasses on his excruciatingly long walk to a 350-yard drive.

But a professional draft is different, especially when fans are as invested as they are in football. And basketball, for that matter.

Thursday’s telecast of the NFL Draft’s first round had to make Bob Hayes proud. It flew by.

Not coincidentally, it had to go down as a JaMarcus Russell – the worst of all-time, flawed in so many ways.

But there’s good news: The NBA should have learned a whole lot in terms of What Not To Include in the script for its big night in June.

Here are six suggestions.

Say Something

I found it interesting that some day-after critics of ABC’s telecast found it noteworthy that Nick Saban labeled one selection “not really a self-starter.”

Wow. Scathing. Potentially libelous. Shocked he wasn’t dismissed from the panel immediately.

OK, maybe not.

That was the most controversial thing Saban said all night, the only utterance to which fired-up football fans in TV-land screamed back: “Yeah. You tell ‘em, Coach. The guy is fat and out of shape. Been saying that all season.”

That’s why we gathered the gang, slipped on our 2025 Fantasy Football Champs t-shirts and poured the Mexican Coke. We didn’t come to hear “Go Wolverines” and “Go Buckeyes” from Saban’s sidekicks.

A draft inspires debate. Half a team’s fan base has been calling talk radio for weeks demanding their scouting chops go regional. The other half has waited until day-after to let everyone know they heard it here first: Our pick blows.

Yet all we heard on NFL Day 1 was how coachable the kid was and what a great fit he’d be.

THIRTY-TWO TIMES.

Give me …

Ban Cheerleaders

It all starts with the panel. Ernie Johnson is the perfect NBA host.

Then you need book-end blowhards. The Republican and the Democrat, if you will.

Stephen A. Smith is ideal. Informed, well spoken and, most importantly, loud.

Then you need someone equally bull-headed, but ideally from a basketball background. I see him, but it would be bold – Draymond Green the player/analyst.

In between, we only have Johnson … because I’m saving the fourth virtual seat for a real game-breaker. If you thought Green was out there … Stay tuned.

“I Want to Thank …”

The three biggest wastes of time on draft night are:

  • “I wouldn’t be here without my mom.” (Every player interview.)
  • “We’re so proud.” (Every parent interview.)
  • “Can you describe your feelings?” (Every interviewer.)

It reminds me – time and time and time again – of a roving baseball reporter in the stands chatting with a rookie outfielder’s family while a no-hitter is going on.

Can we get back to the action?

No interviews!

“Jeopardy” Can Wait

What’s the rush? We’ve tuned in to welcome (or trash) our new baby. Let’s spend the night together.

Fifteen minutes between picks seems perfectly fine.

There are two aspects of each pick that every fan of that team wants to hear experts dissect: The current state of the team (leading into who would be the ideal addition) and the snap-judgement fit/ramifications of the pick itself in the immediate aftermath of it having been made.

Five minutes of the former and five minutes of the latter might not be enough time. OK, so how about six of each? It’s the best we can do.

Throw in your three minutes of commercials and you have 15 minutes of absolute sports heaven sandwiching each pick. Times 30.

Not eight (down from 10) like the NFL sped us through in its all-important Round 1.

What’s Must-See TV Without a Celebrity?

Sadly I must admit: Yes, you can have too much Stephen A. Smith. So let’s trump his and Draymond’s dueling haymakers with a “wow-inducing” local expert with something of substance to say about each pick.

I’m talking Barack Obama living and dying with his beloved Bulls. Kevin Hart, Peyton Manning, Patrick Mahomes, David Letterman, Tiger Woods, Uma Thurman, Drake, Billy Crystal, Dianna Russini …

You’ve now elevated your telecast to Academy Awards level. And the great thing about these ultimate attention-grabbers – every team has at least one – is they would kill to have their basketball expertise heard. You know, like real fans.

Each joins the debate for his/her team via satellite, shoehorned into the six-minute lead-in and the six-minute critique. Tell me you wouldn’t tune in for that.

It sure beats watching them actually try to play in a celebrity game.

You Make The Call

Thirty teams with 15 minutes between picks. Give me a second … that’s 7 1/2 hours. Yikes.

How in the world can we get people to stick around for Oklahoma City’s pick well around the clock has struck midnight?

You gotta know I have an idea:

Make the thing interactive. As soon as the screen flashes, “The Pick Is In,” you have one minute to text your prediction to 3447274554268 (DGIsBrilliant).

Viewer with the most correct selections wins $1 million. You sleeping in the next day?

To quote Kirk Herbstreit (for the one and only time): “I love it.”

Source link
#NBA #Draft #Learn #NFL #Draft #Deadspin.com

Previous post

From the Archive: The Evolution of the Met Gala, From Society Supper to Global Spectacle

Next post

Palantir Debuts Chic Chore Coat So the World Knows You’re One of the Baddies<img src="https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/04/palatnir-chore-coats-1280x853.jpg" /><br><div> <p>This week, Palantir announced the upcoming release of a new chore coat branded with the company’s logo. The company has been releasing gear since 2024, and this new coat is a great way to tell everyone what you stand for. Specifically, it communicates to everyone in your immediate vicinity that you <a href="https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/palantir-deportation-roundup">support ICE</a> and aren’t a big fan of <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html">civil liberties</a>.</p> <p>Palantir’s head of strategic engagement Eliano A. Younes tweeted the chore coat this week, which he says will be released on <a href="https://x.com/eliano/status/2046585486005748007">April 30</a>.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true"> <p lang="en" dir="ltr">the lightweight Palantir chore coat</p> <p>[04.30.2026 • 0930 AM EST] <a href="https://t.co/9K5fmu3bSs">pic.twitter.com/9K5fmu3bSs</a></p> <p>— Eliano A Younes (@eliano) <a href="https://twitter.com/eliano/status/2046585486005748007?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 21, 2026</a></p></blockquote> <p>X users responded to Younes with the kind of comments that anyone might expect about Palantir, a company aligned with President Donald Trump and the most dystopian elements of our modern surveillance society.</p> <p><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3">“could it be operated remotely ? detonated? listening ? what’s the features list,” one user joked, while another asked if it had “built in surveillance trackers?”</span></p> <p>But Younes seemed genuinely offended by the most obvious jokes any reasonable person might be expected to make of Palantir, a defense contractor that prides itself in helping surveil and kill people <a href="https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/02/palantir-alex-karp-trump-private-prisons-profiteers/">around the world</a>. He responded with “<span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3">here for the shitposting but I need to see better from you. this is unoriginal and not funny,” and “not even remotely funny. try harder.”</span></p> <p>Even Palantir employees seem to be waking up to what the company stands for, according to a recent report from <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/palantir-employees-are-starting-to-wonder-if-theyre-the-bad-guys/">Wired</a>. When the U.S. launched a missile attack against an elementary school in Iran on Feb. 28 that killed about 175 people, mostly children, the employees reportedly started to question whether Palantir’s Maven technology had been used. Employees are also worried about the company’s lucrative <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/01/report-ice-using-palantir-tool-feeds-medicaid-data">contracts with ICE</a>, an organization that has been terrorizing American streets in particularly heinous ways.</p> <p>But Palantir seems intent on pushing out gear that allows like-minded people to wrap themselves in a horrifying, anti-American brand.</p> <p>“We want millions of people wearing Palantir merch around the world,” recently Younes told <a href="https://www.gq.com/story/palantir-tennis-merch">GQ</a>. Younes says he wants Palantir to be a lifestyle brand, telling GQ, “There are people out there wearing Palantir merchandise to signal their alignment with our mission, and that’s exactly what a lifestyle brand is.”</p> <p>That lifestyle, of course, isn’t something that decent people would be proud of. Palantir recently promoted a Reader’s Digest-style version of the book <em><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="r-36ujnk">The Technological Republic</span></span></em>, co-authored by CEO Alex Karp, in a tweet. The book advocates for reinstatement of the draft, says the “<span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><span class="r-b88u0q">postwar neutering</span></span>” of Germany and Japan following the atrocities of World War II was an overcorrection, and criticizes the <a href="https://x.com/PalantirTech/status/2045574398573453312">concept of pluralism</a>.</p> <p>It’s not just the chore coat. The company also sell sweatshirts, t-shirts, and hats, among other items. One t-shirt Palantir sold in 2025 featured an image of Karp along with the word “<a href="https://store.palantir.com/collections/archive/products/karpism-tee">Dominate</a>.” That item is no longer available for purchase.</p> <p>Younes also suggested to GQ that its CEO was important for Palantir as a fashion brand: “A lot of the store’s designs are downstream of Dr. Karp and our chief technology officer Shyam Sankar’s personal style.” Younes wouldn’t say how many units the company is selling, but did claim, “store sales have increased 64% year-over-year and everything we’ve made has sold out, sometimes in minutes.”</p> <p>GQ asked about Palantir’s ICE contracts and the other “controversial” things it’s engaged in with the U.S. military, but Younes insisted the company is “not political,” whatever that’s supposed to  mean.</p> <p>As the Wall Street Journal recently <a href="https://www.wsj.com/tech/silicon-valley-founder-fashion-nvidia-huang-anduril-luckey-musk-tesla-palantir-karp-4d8b9339">pointed out</a>, Palantir is leaning hard into selling the “tech-boss-as-hero ethos,” that’s frankly pretty common in Silicon Valley these days. But even some fans of the company think the merchandising effort is embarrassing.</p> <p>“Unpopular opinion: all these merch posts are so ‘fan boy’ and extra cringe,” one user wrote in the Palantir subreddit about Karp’s <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/PLTR/comments/1nkq4bt/pltr_dominate_shirts_sold_out_wild/">Dominate shirt</a>. “Like the stock or don’t, believe in the company or don’t,…. But the incessant merch posts are weak sauce.”</p> <p>Others are fully bought in, with one user writing, “Definitely a collectors item for me, could be worth something one day.”</p> <p>Younes told GQ that Palantir is working on a tennis collection and something for the <a href="https://america250.org/">America 250</a> celebrations this summer. So if you’re a fan of techno-fascism, keep your eyes peeled. Whatever merch they’ve got planned for the rest of the year could be sold out in no time.</p> </div><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>#Palantir #Debuts #Chic #Chore #Coat #World #Youre #BaddiesPalantir

Welcome to Sportstar’s live coverage of the Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match being played at the Emirates.

LINEUPS

Arsenal: Raya (gk), White, Saliba, Gabriel, Hincapie, Odegaard, Zubimendi, Rice, Madueke, Havertz, Eze

Newcastle United: Pope (gk), Miley, Thiaw, Botman, Burn, Guimaraes, Tonali, Ramsey, Murphy, Osula, Willock

LIVE UPDATES

LIVESTREAM AND TELECAST INFO

When will the Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match kick off?

The Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match will kick off at 10:00 p.m. IST, on Saturday, April 25, at the Emirates.

Where to watch the Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match?

The Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match will be telecast on the Star Sports Network. The match will also be livestreamed on the JioHotstar app and website.

Published on Apr 25, 2026

#Arsenal #Newcastle #United #LIVE #score #Realtime #updates #ARS #Premier #League #clash">Arsenal vs Newcastle United LIVE score: Real-time updates from ARS v NEW Premier League clash  Welcome to Sportstar’s live coverage of the Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match being played at the Emirates.LINEUPSArsenal: Raya (gk), White, Saliba, Gabriel, Hincapie, Odegaard, Zubimendi, Rice, Madueke, Havertz, EzeNewcastle United: Pope (gk), Miley, Thiaw, Botman, Burn, Guimaraes, Tonali, Ramsey, Murphy, Osula, WillockLIVE UPDATESLIVESTREAM AND TELECAST INFOWhen will the Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match kick off?The Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match will kick off at 10:00 p.m. IST, on Saturday, April 25, at the Emirates.Where to watch the Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match?The Arsenal vs Newcastle United Premier League 2025-26 match will be telecast on the        Star Sports Network. The match will also be livestreamed on the        JioHotstar app and website.Published on Apr 25, 2026  #Arsenal #Newcastle #United #LIVE #score #Realtime #updates #ARS #Premier #League #clash

Deadspin | Will Sabres’ road excellence override Bruins’ home brilliance again in Game 4?  Apr 23, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Buffalo Sabres defenseman Bowen Byram (4) celebrates with his teammates after scoring a goal against the Boston Bruins during the second period of game three of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs at the TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brian Fluharty-Imagn Images   The Buffalo Sabres take aim at their second straight road win in Boston and full command of their Eastern Conference first-round playoff series when they meet the Bruins in Game 4 on Sunday afternoon.  How unlikely would back-to-back road wins be? Well, no team in the NHL earned more home wins during the regular season than Boston’s 29. On the other hand, Buffalo enjoyed significant road success after Dec. 8 — posting a 22-4-2 record that coincided with their sharp climb to the top of the Atlantic Division.  The Sabres continued their trend with a 3-1 win Thursday that claimed a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series.  “I (told the team before Thursday’s game), ‘You’re gonna get a different type of atmosphere, but just believe in the way we need to play,'” Ruff said of the shift to Boston’s TD Garden. “And I thought we executed that to a T.”  Thursday’s encounter was another come-from-behind effort for Buffalo, as it scored the last two of its three straight goals in the third period to erase Boston’s lead from Tanner Jeannot’s opening tally.  After Alex Tuch scored the go-ahead and eventual game-winning goal at 4:03 of the third, the Sabres’ penalty kill (10-for-12 in the series) took care of back-to-back penalties to help finish off the win.  Rookie Noah Ostlund and Bowen Byram each had a goal and an assist for the Sabres.  Alex Lyon provided steady goaltending in his first start of the series, stopping 24 of the 25 shots he faced. He also denied Viktor Arvidsson’s penalty shot in the second period.  “We came (into Game 3) with a great mindset and you could feel it in the room, that we were just going to send it for 60 minutes and kind of that’s all you can do, you know?” Lyon said. “The team gave me confidence, and we played desperately, so it was good.”  If the Sabres can put together another complete effort, then they would have a chance to finish the series on home ice. Game 5 is Tuesday in Buffalo.   The Bruins have been right there, taking leads in all three games and letting them slip in the final frame in both of their losses.  Jeannot, whose goal was the first of his playoff career, knows that there is no option other than to enter the game with the same mindset.  “Just move on. Go to the next game, start thinking about that,” Jeannot said. “We will see what we need to do, what we need to change and continue building our game. It’s a long series, and we’re not giving up, that’s for sure. We are going to be fighting for the home crowd again.”  Of course, both teams are playing the same schedule, but the Bruins hope that the rare two days of rest between games could benefit them as they look to square the series again.  First-year coach Marco Sturm is expected to have a different lineup coming out of the extra day. James Hagens, the Bruins’ 2025 first-round draft pick who made his NHL debut on April 12, is likely to draw out in favor of Lukas Reichel.  The 19-year-old Hagens, who played in just two regular-season games after being recalled from AHL affiliate Providence, has teamed up with Fraser Minten and Marat Khusnutdinov on what Sturm has dubbed the “kid line.”  The trio has largely performed well, but it was a tough Game 3 for Hagens. In particular, Byram’s game-tying goal deflected off his stick and past goaltender Jeremy Swayman.  “Consistency is the hardest part for those young kids, it really is,” Sturm said. “You need the experience and you need those games to go through it. And that’s where we’re at right now. Can they stay consistent? Yeah, there was a little drop (in Game 3). It’s hard in the playoffs.”  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Sabres #road #excellence #override #Bruins #home #brilliance #GameApr 23, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Buffalo Sabres defenseman Bowen Byram (4) celebrates with his teammates after scoring a goal against the Boston Bruins during the second period of game three of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs at the TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brian Fluharty-Imagn Images

The Buffalo Sabres take aim at their second straight road win in Boston and full command of their Eastern Conference first-round playoff series when they meet the Bruins in Game 4 on Sunday afternoon.

How unlikely would back-to-back road wins be? Well, no team in the NHL earned more home wins during the regular season than Boston’s 29. On the other hand, Buffalo enjoyed significant road success after Dec. 8 — posting a 22-4-2 record that coincided with their sharp climb to the top of the Atlantic Division.

The Sabres continued their trend with a 3-1 win Thursday that claimed a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series.

“I (told the team before Thursday’s game), ‘You’re gonna get a different type of atmosphere, but just believe in the way we need to play,'” Ruff said of the shift to Boston’s TD Garden. “And I thought we executed that to a T.”

Thursday’s encounter was another come-from-behind effort for Buffalo, as it scored the last two of its three straight goals in the third period to erase Boston’s lead from Tanner Jeannot’s opening tally.

After Alex Tuch scored the go-ahead and eventual game-winning goal at 4:03 of the third, the Sabres’ penalty kill (10-for-12 in the series) took care of back-to-back penalties to help finish off the win.

Rookie Noah Ostlund and Bowen Byram each had a goal and an assist for the Sabres.

Alex Lyon provided steady goaltending in his first start of the series, stopping 24 of the 25 shots he faced. He also denied Viktor Arvidsson’s penalty shot in the second period.

“We came (into Game 3) with a great mindset and you could feel it in the room, that we were just going to send it for 60 minutes and kind of that’s all you can do, you know?” Lyon said. “The team gave me confidence, and we played desperately, so it was good.”


If the Sabres can put together another complete effort, then they would have a chance to finish the series on home ice. Game 5 is Tuesday in Buffalo.

The Bruins have been right there, taking leads in all three games and letting them slip in the final frame in both of their losses.

Jeannot, whose goal was the first of his playoff career, knows that there is no option other than to enter the game with the same mindset.

“Just move on. Go to the next game, start thinking about that,” Jeannot said. “We will see what we need to do, what we need to change and continue building our game. It’s a long series, and we’re not giving up, that’s for sure. We are going to be fighting for the home crowd again.”

Of course, both teams are playing the same schedule, but the Bruins hope that the rare two days of rest between games could benefit them as they look to square the series again.

First-year coach Marco Sturm is expected to have a different lineup coming out of the extra day. James Hagens, the Bruins’ 2025 first-round draft pick who made his NHL debut on April 12, is likely to draw out in favor of Lukas Reichel.

The 19-year-old Hagens, who played in just two regular-season games after being recalled from AHL affiliate Providence, has teamed up with Fraser Minten and Marat Khusnutdinov on what Sturm has dubbed the “kid line.”

The trio has largely performed well, but it was a tough Game 3 for Hagens. In particular, Byram’s game-tying goal deflected off his stick and past goaltender Jeremy Swayman.

“Consistency is the hardest part for those young kids, it really is,” Sturm said. “You need the experience and you need those games to go through it. And that’s where we’re at right now. Can they stay consistent? Yeah, there was a little drop (in Game 3). It’s hard in the playoffs.”

–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Sabres #road #excellence #override #Bruins #home #brilliance #Game">Deadspin | Will Sabres’ road excellence override Bruins’ home brilliance again in Game 4?  Apr 23, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Buffalo Sabres defenseman Bowen Byram (4) celebrates with his teammates after scoring a goal against the Boston Bruins during the second period of game three of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs at the TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Brian Fluharty-Imagn Images   The Buffalo Sabres take aim at their second straight road win in Boston and full command of their Eastern Conference first-round playoff series when they meet the Bruins in Game 4 on Sunday afternoon.  How unlikely would back-to-back road wins be? Well, no team in the NHL earned more home wins during the regular season than Boston’s 29. On the other hand, Buffalo enjoyed significant road success after Dec. 8 — posting a 22-4-2 record that coincided with their sharp climb to the top of the Atlantic Division.  The Sabres continued their trend with a 3-1 win Thursday that claimed a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series.  “I (told the team before Thursday’s game), ‘You’re gonna get a different type of atmosphere, but just believe in the way we need to play,'” Ruff said of the shift to Boston’s TD Garden. “And I thought we executed that to a T.”  Thursday’s encounter was another come-from-behind effort for Buffalo, as it scored the last two of its three straight goals in the third period to erase Boston’s lead from Tanner Jeannot’s opening tally.  After Alex Tuch scored the go-ahead and eventual game-winning goal at 4:03 of the third, the Sabres’ penalty kill (10-for-12 in the series) took care of back-to-back penalties to help finish off the win.  Rookie Noah Ostlund and Bowen Byram each had a goal and an assist for the Sabres.  Alex Lyon provided steady goaltending in his first start of the series, stopping 24 of the 25 shots he faced. He also denied Viktor Arvidsson’s penalty shot in the second period.  “We came (into Game 3) with a great mindset and you could feel it in the room, that we were just going to send it for 60 minutes and kind of that’s all you can do, you know?” Lyon said. “The team gave me confidence, and we played desperately, so it was good.”  If the Sabres can put together another complete effort, then they would have a chance to finish the series on home ice. Game 5 is Tuesday in Buffalo.   The Bruins have been right there, taking leads in all three games and letting them slip in the final frame in both of their losses.  Jeannot, whose goal was the first of his playoff career, knows that there is no option other than to enter the game with the same mindset.  “Just move on. Go to the next game, start thinking about that,” Jeannot said. “We will see what we need to do, what we need to change and continue building our game. It’s a long series, and we’re not giving up, that’s for sure. We are going to be fighting for the home crowd again.”  Of course, both teams are playing the same schedule, but the Bruins hope that the rare two days of rest between games could benefit them as they look to square the series again.  First-year coach Marco Sturm is expected to have a different lineup coming out of the extra day. James Hagens, the Bruins’ 2025 first-round draft pick who made his NHL debut on April 12, is likely to draw out in favor of Lukas Reichel.  The 19-year-old Hagens, who played in just two regular-season games after being recalled from AHL affiliate Providence, has teamed up with Fraser Minten and Marat Khusnutdinov on what Sturm has dubbed the “kid line.”  The trio has largely performed well, but it was a tough Game 3 for Hagens. In particular, Byram’s game-tying goal deflected off his stick and past goaltender Jeremy Swayman.  “Consistency is the hardest part for those young kids, it really is,” Sturm said. “You need the experience and you need those games to go through it. And that’s where we’re at right now. Can they stay consistent? Yeah, there was a little drop (in Game 3). It’s hard in the playoffs.”  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Sabres #road #excellence #override #Bruins #home #brilliance #Game

Post Comment