×
Yes, Apple Is Reportedly Retooling Some Liquid Glass Problems for macOS 27 By providing a needed security patch to an older version of iOS last month, Apple tacitly—but unofficially—acknowledged that avoiding the Liquid Glass aesthetic is a valid choice. Now, according to anonymous sources who spoke to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, an upcoming update will address problems with Liquid Glass in macOS 26. If you haven’t updated because you hate it, or are worried the design flaws make it unusable, you are seen. Gurman writes that Apple “is preparing what people internally consider to be a ‘slight redesign’ for macOS 27,” and that the company is looking to fix, “shadows and transparency quirks.” Gurman’s sources sound a bit defensive, however. They tell him the Liquid Glass update “didn’t necessarily suffer from design problems,” but instead had “a not-completely-baked implementation from Apple’s software engineering team.” The fixes, then, are supposed to “make Liquid Glass look the way Apple’s design team intended it to from the start.” Got it? The designers thought everything through from the beginning, but the artless neanderthals who built their designs into software—this thinking goes—let them down. My first impression was that it was overly generous of Gurman to give voice to this framing of the Liquid Glass story, but I have to admit that it’s also a genuinely plausible explanation for just how hated the design scheme ended up being. For instance, while Apple has already chipped away at some of the bigger problems, Tahoe shipped with some issues that were beyond annoying and actually interfered with usability, particularly for low vision people. Before the 26.3 update in February, as OS X Daily noted, choosing the option to reduce transparency “would leave considerable transparent effects, including in sidebars, headers, titlebars, search boxes, and more, leading to situations where text would overlap and interface elements would be washed out with blurry colors and interface elements.” Then again, some designs were heavily criticized on an aesthetic basis, not as bad implementation. There’s probably no bigger Apple fan than John Gruber of Daring Fireball, and his take on the redesign of some of the icons was scorching: “I don’t think the old icons for these apps from MacOS 15 were particularly good — Apple has mostly lost its “icons look cool” game. But the new ones in MacOS 26 Tahoe are objectively terrible.” Gurman has claimed in the past that Liquid Glass is sort of a long game, rolled out in advance of the release of the 20th anniversary iPhone, which he expects to be a huge design milestone for Apple. Supposedly, that phone’s overall vibe will benefit from Liquid Glass. When all is revealed, maybe the world will agree. In the meantime, macOS is getting some tweaks, and we should expect, Gurman says, “more of a cleanup and refinement effort aligned with the company’s wider push to polish its software this year.” #Apple #Reportedly #Retooling #Liquid #Glass #Problems #macOSApple,Liquid Glass,macos 27

Yes, Apple Is Reportedly Retooling Some Liquid Glass Problems for macOS 27Yes, Apple Is Reportedly Retooling Some Liquid Glass Problems for macOS 27 By providing a needed security patch to an older version of iOS last month, Apple tacitly—but unofficially—acknowledged that avoiding the Liquid Glass aesthetic is a valid choice. Now, according to anonymous sources who spoke to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, an upcoming update will address problems with Liquid Glass in macOS 26. If you haven’t updated because you hate it, or are worried the design flaws make it unusable, you are seen. Gurman writes that Apple “is preparing what people internally consider to be a ‘slight redesign’ for macOS 27,” and that the company is looking to fix, “shadows and transparency quirks.” Gurman’s sources sound a bit defensive, however. They tell him the Liquid Glass update “didn’t necessarily suffer from design problems,” but instead had “a not-completely-baked implementation from Apple’s software engineering team.” The fixes, then, are supposed to “make Liquid Glass look the way Apple’s design team intended it to from the start.” Got it? The designers thought everything through from the beginning, but the artless neanderthals who built their designs into software—this thinking goes—let them down. My first impression was that it was overly generous of Gurman to give voice to this framing of the Liquid Glass story, but I have to admit that it’s also a genuinely plausible explanation for just how hated the design scheme ended up being. For instance, while Apple has already chipped away at some of the bigger problems, Tahoe shipped with some issues that were beyond annoying and actually interfered with usability, particularly for low vision people. Before the 26.3 update in February, as OS X Daily noted, choosing the option to reduce transparency “would leave considerable transparent effects, including in sidebars, headers, titlebars, search boxes, and more, leading to situations where text would overlap and interface elements would be washed out with blurry colors and interface elements.” Then again, some designs were heavily criticized on an aesthetic basis, not as bad implementation. There’s probably no bigger Apple fan than John Gruber of Daring Fireball, and his take on the redesign of some of the icons was scorching: “I don’t think the old icons for these apps from MacOS 15 were particularly good — Apple has mostly lost its “icons look cool” game. But the new ones in MacOS 26 Tahoe are objectively terrible.” Gurman has claimed in the past that Liquid Glass is sort of a long game, rolled out in advance of the release of the 20th anniversary iPhone, which he expects to be a huge design milestone for Apple. Supposedly, that phone’s overall vibe will benefit from Liquid Glass. When all is revealed, maybe the world will agree. In the meantime, macOS is getting some tweaks, and we should expect, Gurman says, “more of a cleanup and refinement effort aligned with the company’s wider push to polish its software this year.” #Apple #Reportedly #Retooling #Liquid #Glass #Problems #macOSApple,Liquid Glass,macos 27

By providing a needed security patch to an older version of iOS last month, Apple tacitly—but unofficially—acknowledged that avoiding the Liquid Glass aesthetic is a valid choice.

Now, according to anonymous sources who spoke to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, an upcoming update will address problems with Liquid Glass in macOS 26. If you haven’t updated because you hate it, or are worried the design flaws make it unusable, you are seen.

Gurman writes that Apple “is preparing what people internally consider to be a ‘slight redesign’ for macOS 27,” and that the company is looking to fix, “shadows and transparency quirks.”

Gurman’s sources sound a bit defensive, however. They tell him the Liquid Glass update “didn’t necessarily suffer from design problems,” but instead had “a not-completely-baked implementation from Apple’s software engineering team.” The fixes, then, are supposed to “make Liquid Glass look the way Apple’s design team intended it to from the start.” Got it? The designers thought everything through from the beginning, but the artless neanderthals who built their designs into software—this thinking goes—let them down.

My first impression was that it was overly generous of Gurman to give voice to this framing of the Liquid Glass story, but I have to admit that it’s also a genuinely plausible explanation for just how hated the design scheme ended up being.

For instance, while Apple has already chipped away at some of the bigger problems, Tahoe shipped with some issues that were beyond annoying and actually interfered with usability, particularly for low vision people. Before the 26.3 update in February, as OS X Daily noted, choosing the option to reduce transparency “would leave considerable transparent effects, including in sidebars, headers, titlebars, search boxes, and more, leading to situations where text would overlap and interface elements would be washed out with blurry colors and interface elements.”

Then again, some designs were heavily criticized on an aesthetic basis, not as bad implementation. There’s probably no bigger Apple fan than John Gruber of Daring Fireball, and his take on the redesign of some of the icons was scorching: “I don’t think the old icons for these apps from MacOS 15 were particularly good — Apple has mostly lost its “icons look cool” game. But the new ones in MacOS 26 Tahoe are objectively terrible.”

Gurman has claimed in the past that Liquid Glass is sort of a long game, rolled out in advance of the release of the 20th anniversary iPhone, which he expects to be a huge design milestone for Apple. Supposedly, that phone’s overall vibe will benefit from Liquid Glass. When all is revealed, maybe the world will agree.

In the meantime, macOS is getting some tweaks, and we should expect, Gurman says, “more of a cleanup and refinement effort aligned with the company’s wider push to polish its software this year.”

#Apple #Reportedly #Retooling #Liquid #Glass #Problems #macOSApple,Liquid Glass,macos 27

Tech-news , ,

By providing a needed security patch to an older version of iOS last month, Apple tacitly—but unofficially—acknowledged that avoiding the Liquid Glass aesthetic is a valid choice.

Now, according to anonymous sources who spoke to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, an upcoming update will address problems with Liquid Glass in macOS 26. If you haven’t updated because you hate it, or are worried the design flaws make it unusable, you are seen.

Gurman writes that Apple “is preparing what people internally consider to be a ‘slight redesign’ for macOS 27,” and that the company is looking to fix, “shadows and transparency quirks.”

Gurman’s sources sound a bit defensive, however. They tell him the Liquid Glass update “didn’t necessarily suffer from design problems,” but instead had “a not-completely-baked implementation from Apple’s software engineering team.” The fixes, then, are supposed to “make Liquid Glass look the way Apple’s design team intended it to from the start.” Got it? The designers thought everything through from the beginning, but the artless neanderthals who built their designs into software—this thinking goes—let them down.

My first impression was that it was overly generous of Gurman to give voice to this framing of the Liquid Glass story, but I have to admit that it’s also a genuinely plausible explanation for just how hated the design scheme ended up being.

For instance, while Apple has already chipped away at some of the bigger problems, Tahoe shipped with some issues that were beyond annoying and actually interfered with usability, particularly for low vision people. Before the 26.3 update in February, as OS X Daily noted, choosing the option to reduce transparency “would leave considerable transparent effects, including in sidebars, headers, titlebars, search boxes, and more, leading to situations where text would overlap and interface elements would be washed out with blurry colors and interface elements.”

Then again, some designs were heavily criticized on an aesthetic basis, not as bad implementation. There’s probably no bigger Apple fan than John Gruber of Daring Fireball, and his take on the redesign of some of the icons was scorching: “I don’t think the old icons for these apps from MacOS 15 were particularly good — Apple has mostly lost its “icons look cool” game. But the new ones in MacOS 26 Tahoe are objectively terrible.”

Gurman has claimed in the past that Liquid Glass is sort of a long game, rolled out in advance of the release of the 20th anniversary iPhone, which he expects to be a huge design milestone for Apple. Supposedly, that phone’s overall vibe will benefit from Liquid Glass. When all is revealed, maybe the world will agree.

In the meantime, macOS is getting some tweaks, and we should expect, Gurman says, “more of a cleanup and refinement effort aligned with the company’s wider push to polish its software this year.”

Source link
#Apple #Reportedly #Retooling #Liquid #Glass #Problems #macOS

Tag

Related Posts

AI-related job loss fears grow each time another company announces a round of layoffs. Through May of 2026, companies announced that close to 90,000 job cuts were tied to AI, and, by some accounts, up to 15% of U.S. jobs are projected to be eliminated by AI over the next five years. Promises from the tech industry that AI will also create new jobs does little to ease fears, especially for the generation wondering if anyone will be hiring when they graduate. 

A recent report from Ramp and Revelio Labs, which track enterprise AI spend and workforce records from nearly 22,000 companies, respectively, complicates that gloomy narrative. 

The report found that companies spending heavily on AI are growing headcount faster, even in the entry-level roles that many fear are doomed. According to the report, “high-intensity adopters” — firms that spend on average $30 per employee per month on AI in the first three months — saw headcount increase 10.2%.

Headcount also rose across functions, including engineering, sales, administration, customer service, finance, marketing, and scientist roles. The strongest job growth among high-intensity adopters was in the information sector, which includes software, internet, media, and tech-adjacent firms. 

Despite these positive signals, the data isn’t as rosy as it seems. It skews heavily towards tech-forward, knowledge-work firms — ones that might have VC-backing and are growing fast anyway, making it difficult to say whether AI is contributing to the hiring or just showing up at companies that are expanding anyway.

“This paper does not show that AI universally creates jobs,” the paper’s authors admit, “but it does counter claims that AI will lead to broad job losses.”

It also counters claims that AI is killing all junior jobs. Recent research from Goldman Sachs found that AI has already erased about 16,000 net jobs per month over the past year, with Gen Z and entry level workers taking the brunt of the burden. But in tech-forward firms, the report finds that entry-level headcount actually rose by 12%.

So what can we take away from this? Perhaps that AI isn’t always a tool for labor substitution, but that it can be a tool for firm-expansion instead. 

“For software and technology firms, AI can make core output cheaper or faster to produce: writing code, debugging, building internal tools, producing technical documentation, and supporting product development,” the report reads. “Lower production costs in these workflows can raise the return to expanding the whole firm, not just the engineering team.”

But companies that buy subscriptions and run pilots, yet did not go on to make sustained investments, don’t tend to see any gains in headcount, per the report. 

That sets up the potential for a widening gap between firms that have the resources — like capital, technical staff, founder networks, and management bandwidth — to turn AI adoption into actual business gains and those that are stuck experimenting with subscriptions. In other words, this report suggests that firms that already have the resources are the ones who will see the largest gains. 

The paper’s authors speculate such a divide may continue to grow, saying: “Firms without those channels may fall behind.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#jobs #debate #messier #TechCrunchRamp,ai job loss,revelio labs">The AI jobs debate just got messier | TechCrunch AI-related job loss fears grow each time another company announces a round of layoffs. Through May of 2026, companies announced that close to 90,000 job cuts were tied to AI, and, by some accounts, up to 15% of U.S. jobs are projected to be eliminated by AI over the next five years. Promises from the tech industry that AI will also create new jobs does little to ease fears, especially for the generation wondering if anyone will be hiring when they graduate.  A recent report from Ramp and Revelio Labs, which track enterprise AI spend and workforce records from nearly 22,000 companies, respectively, complicates that gloomy narrative.  The report found that companies spending heavily on AI are growing headcount faster, even in the entry-level roles that many fear are doomed. According to the report, “high-intensity adopters” — firms that spend on average per employee per month on AI in the first three months — saw headcount increase 10.2%. Headcount also rose across functions, including engineering, sales, administration, customer service, finance, marketing, and scientist roles. The strongest job growth among high-intensity adopters was in the information sector, which includes software, internet, media, and tech-adjacent firms.  Despite these positive signals, the data isn’t as rosy as it seems. It skews heavily towards tech-forward, knowledge-work firms — ones that might have VC-backing and are growing fast anyway, making it difficult to say whether AI is contributing to the hiring or just showing up at companies that are expanding anyway. “This paper does not show that AI universally creates jobs,” the paper’s authors admit, “but it does counter claims that AI will lead to broad job losses.” It also counters claims that AI is killing all junior jobs. Recent research from Goldman Sachs found that AI has already erased about 16,000 net jobs per month over the past year, with Gen Z and entry level workers taking the brunt of the burden. But in tech-forward firms, the report finds that entry-level headcount actually rose by 12%. So what can we take away from this? Perhaps that AI isn’t always a tool for labor substitution, but that it can be a tool for firm-expansion instead.  “For software and technology firms, AI can make core output cheaper or faster to produce: writing code, debugging, building internal tools, producing technical documentation, and supporting product development,” the report reads. “Lower production costs in these workflows can raise the return to expanding the whole firm, not just the engineering team.” But companies that buy subscriptions and run pilots, yet did not go on to make sustained investments, don’t tend to see any gains in headcount, per the report.  That sets up the potential for a widening gap between firms that have the resources — like capital, technical staff, founder networks, and management bandwidth — to turn AI adoption into actual business gains and those that are stuck experimenting with subscriptions. In other words, this report suggests that firms that already have the resources are the ones who will see the largest gains.  The paper’s authors speculate such a divide may continue to grow, saying: “Firms without those channels may fall behind.” When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#jobs #debate #messier #TechCrunchRamp,ai job loss,revelio labs

announces a round of layoffs. Through May of 2026, companies announced that close to 90,000 job cuts were tied to AI, and, by some accounts, up to 15% of U.S. jobs are projected to be eliminated by AI over the next five years. Promises from the tech industry that AI will also create new jobs does little to ease fears, especially for the generation wondering if anyone will be hiring when they graduate. 

A recent report from Ramp and Revelio Labs, which track enterprise AI spend and workforce records from nearly 22,000 companies, respectively, complicates that gloomy narrative. 

The report found that companies spending heavily on AI are growing headcount faster, even in the entry-level roles that many fear are doomed. According to the report, “high-intensity adopters” — firms that spend on average $30 per employee per month on AI in the first three months — saw headcount increase 10.2%.

Headcount also rose across functions, including engineering, sales, administration, customer service, finance, marketing, and scientist roles. The strongest job growth among high-intensity adopters was in the information sector, which includes software, internet, media, and tech-adjacent firms. 

Despite these positive signals, the data isn’t as rosy as it seems. It skews heavily towards tech-forward, knowledge-work firms — ones that might have VC-backing and are growing fast anyway, making it difficult to say whether AI is contributing to the hiring or just showing up at companies that are expanding anyway.

“This paper does not show that AI universally creates jobs,” the paper’s authors admit, “but it does counter claims that AI will lead to broad job losses.”

It also counters claims that AI is killing all junior jobs. Recent research from Goldman Sachs found that AI has already erased about 16,000 net jobs per month over the past year, with Gen Z and entry level workers taking the brunt of the burden. But in tech-forward firms, the report finds that entry-level headcount actually rose by 12%.

So what can we take away from this? Perhaps that AI isn’t always a tool for labor substitution, but that it can be a tool for firm-expansion instead. 

“For software and technology firms, AI can make core output cheaper or faster to produce: writing code, debugging, building internal tools, producing technical documentation, and supporting product development,” the report reads. “Lower production costs in these workflows can raise the return to expanding the whole firm, not just the engineering team.”

But companies that buy subscriptions and run pilots, yet did not go on to make sustained investments, don’t tend to see any gains in headcount, per the report. 

That sets up the potential for a widening gap between firms that have the resources — like capital, technical staff, founder networks, and management bandwidth — to turn AI adoption into actual business gains and those that are stuck experimenting with subscriptions. In other words, this report suggests that firms that already have the resources are the ones who will see the largest gains. 

The paper’s authors speculate such a divide may continue to grow, saying: “Firms without those channels may fall behind.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#jobs #debate #messier #TechCrunchRamp,ai job loss,revelio labs">The AI jobs debate just got messier | TechCrunch

AI-related job loss fears grow each time another company announces a round of layoffs. Through May of 2026, companies announced that close to 90,000 job cuts were tied to AI, and, by some accounts, up to 15% of U.S. jobs are projected to be eliminated by AI over the next five years. Promises from the tech industry that AI will also create new jobs does little to ease fears, especially for the generation wondering if anyone will be hiring when they graduate. 

A recent report from Ramp and Revelio Labs, which track enterprise AI spend and workforce records from nearly 22,000 companies, respectively, complicates that gloomy narrative. 

The report found that companies spending heavily on AI are growing headcount faster, even in the entry-level roles that many fear are doomed. According to the report, “high-intensity adopters” — firms that spend on average $30 per employee per month on AI in the first three months — saw headcount increase 10.2%.

Headcount also rose across functions, including engineering, sales, administration, customer service, finance, marketing, and scientist roles. The strongest job growth among high-intensity adopters was in the information sector, which includes software, internet, media, and tech-adjacent firms. 

Despite these positive signals, the data isn’t as rosy as it seems. It skews heavily towards tech-forward, knowledge-work firms — ones that might have VC-backing and are growing fast anyway, making it difficult to say whether AI is contributing to the hiring or just showing up at companies that are expanding anyway.

“This paper does not show that AI universally creates jobs,” the paper’s authors admit, “but it does counter claims that AI will lead to broad job losses.”

It also counters claims that AI is killing all junior jobs. Recent research from Goldman Sachs found that AI has already erased about 16,000 net jobs per month over the past year, with Gen Z and entry level workers taking the brunt of the burden. But in tech-forward firms, the report finds that entry-level headcount actually rose by 12%.

So what can we take away from this? Perhaps that AI isn’t always a tool for labor substitution, but that it can be a tool for firm-expansion instead. 

“For software and technology firms, AI can make core output cheaper or faster to produce: writing code, debugging, building internal tools, producing technical documentation, and supporting product development,” the report reads. “Lower production costs in these workflows can raise the return to expanding the whole firm, not just the engineering team.”

But companies that buy subscriptions and run pilots, yet did not go on to make sustained investments, don’t tend to see any gains in headcount, per the report. 

That sets up the potential for a widening gap between firms that have the resources — like capital, technical staff, founder networks, and management bandwidth — to turn AI adoption into actual business gains and those that are stuck experimenting with subscriptions. In other words, this report suggests that firms that already have the resources are the ones who will see the largest gains. 

The paper’s authors speculate such a divide may continue to grow, saying: “Firms without those channels may fall behind.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#jobs #debate #messier #TechCrunchRamp,ai job loss,revelio labs
MacBook and iPad models in India. The updated prices show an increase of around 20% to 42% across many devices. However, the company has not increased iPhone prices at this stage. Apple says the rapid rise in costs of memory and storage components, driven by growing AI demand, led to the decision.

Why Did Apple Increase MacBook and iPad Prices?

Why Has Apple Increased MacBook and iPad Prices by Up to ₹70,000? Apple has announced a major price hike for several MacBook and iPad models in India. The updated prices show an increase of around 20% to 42% across many devices. However, the company has not increased iPhone prices at this stage. Apple says the rapid rise in costs of memory and storage components, driven by growing AI demand, led to the decision. Why Did Apple Increase MacBook and iPad Prices? This price increase has been justified by Apple due to rising costs of producing its products. Specifically, the prices of memory and storage have risen due to strong demand from AI data centers. These components are used in nearly every Mac and iPad. According to Apple, the cost of memory chips and RAM has increased rapidly over the past several months. The company said it absorbed these higher expenses before deciding to revise product prices. Apple believes the current rise in component costs is unlike anything it has seen before. Although iPhone prices remain unchanged today, industry analysts expect Apple to review them if production costs continue to rise. Which Apple Products Have Become More Expensive? The price hike isn’t limited to a handful of devices. Almost all of Apple’s hardware lineup in India has become more expensive, including iPads, Macs, MacBooks, HomePods, and even the Apple TV lineup. The only major exception, for now, is the iPhone, whose prices remain unchanged. Among the biggest increases, the base iPad now starts at ₹49,990 instead of ₹34,990, while the iPad Air has jumped from ₹64,900 to ₹89,900. The flagship iPad Pro has also seen a significant hike, with prices now starting at ₹1,39,900. Apple’s Mac lineup has also become noticeably more expensive. The Mac mini M4 now starts at ₹94,900 (up from ₹59,900), while the iMac M4 has climbed to ₹1,74,900 from ₹1,34,900. The Mac Studio has also received a substantial increase, with the M4 Max model now costing ₹2,79,900 and the M3 Ultra variant reaching ₹5,99,900. The same trend continues across Apple’s notebook lineup. The MacBook Air M5 now starts at ₹1,49,900 instead of ₹1,19,900, while the base 14-inch MacBook Pro M5 has jumped from ₹1,69,900 to ₹2,39,900. The top-end MacBook Pro M5 Max now costs ₹4,99,900, up from ₹3,99,900. Even Apple’s home products haven’t escaped the price revision. The HomePod now costs ₹44,900, the HomePod mini is priced at ₹15,900, and the Apple TV 4K lineup has received one of the steepest hikes, with the 64GB model increasing from ₹14,900 to ₹25,900. #Apple #Increased #MacBook #iPad #Pricesapple

This price increase has been justified by Apple due to rising costs of producing its products. Specifically, the prices of memory and storage have risen due to strong demand from AI data centers. These components are used in nearly every Mac and iPad.

According to Apple, the cost of memory chips and RAM has increased rapidly over the past several months. The company said it absorbed these higher expenses before deciding to revise product prices. Apple believes the current rise in component costs is unlike anything it has seen before. Although iPhone prices remain unchanged today, industry analysts expect Apple to review them if production costs continue to rise.

Which Apple Products Have Become More Expensive?

iPad air different colors

The price hike isn’t limited to a handful of devices. Almost all of Apple’s hardware lineup in India has become more expensive, including iPads, Macs, MacBooks, HomePods, and even the Apple TV lineup. The only major exception, for now, is the iPhone, whose prices remain unchanged. Among the biggest increases, the base iPad now starts at ₹49,990 instead of ₹34,990, while the iPad Air has jumped from ₹64,900 to ₹89,900. The flagship iPad Pro has also seen a significant hike, with prices now starting at ₹1,39,900.

Apple’s Mac lineup has also become noticeably more expensive. The Mac mini M4 now starts at ₹94,900 (up from ₹59,900), while the iMac M4 has climbed to ₹1,74,900 from ₹1,34,900. The Mac Studio has also received a substantial increase, with the M4 Max model now costing ₹2,79,900 and the M3 Ultra variant reaching ₹5,99,900. The same trend continues across Apple’s notebook lineup. The MacBook Air M5 now starts at ₹1,49,900 instead of ₹1,19,900, while the base 14-inch MacBook Pro M5 has jumped from ₹1,69,900 to ₹2,39,900. The top-end MacBook Pro M5 Max now costs ₹4,99,900, up from ₹3,99,900.

Even Apple’s home products haven’t escaped the price revision. The HomePod now costs ₹44,900, the HomePod mini is priced at ₹15,900, and the Apple TV 4K lineup has received one of the steepest hikes, with the 64GB model increasing from ₹14,900 to ₹25,900.

#Apple #Increased #MacBook #iPad #Pricesapple">Why Has Apple Increased MacBook and iPad Prices by Up to ₹70,000? Apple has announced a major price hike for several MacBook and iPad models in India. The updated prices show an increase of around 20% to 42% across many devices. However, the company has not increased iPhone prices at this stage. Apple says the rapid rise in costs of memory and storage components, driven by growing AI demand, led to the decision. Why Did Apple Increase MacBook and iPad Prices? This price increase has been justified by Apple due to rising costs of producing its products. Specifically, the prices of memory and storage have risen due to strong demand from AI data centers. These components are used in nearly every Mac and iPad. According to Apple, the cost of memory chips and RAM has increased rapidly over the past several months. The company said it absorbed these higher expenses before deciding to revise product prices. Apple believes the current rise in component costs is unlike anything it has seen before. Although iPhone prices remain unchanged today, industry analysts expect Apple to review them if production costs continue to rise. Which Apple Products Have Become More Expensive? The price hike isn’t limited to a handful of devices. Almost all of Apple’s hardware lineup in India has become more expensive, including iPads, Macs, MacBooks, HomePods, and even the Apple TV lineup. The only major exception, for now, is the iPhone, whose prices remain unchanged. Among the biggest increases, the base iPad now starts at ₹49,990 instead of ₹34,990, while the iPad Air has jumped from ₹64,900 to ₹89,900. The flagship iPad Pro has also seen a significant hike, with prices now starting at ₹1,39,900. Apple’s Mac lineup has also become noticeably more expensive. The Mac mini M4 now starts at ₹94,900 (up from ₹59,900), while the iMac M4 has climbed to ₹1,74,900 from ₹1,34,900. The Mac Studio has also received a substantial increase, with the M4 Max model now costing ₹2,79,900 and the M3 Ultra variant reaching ₹5,99,900. The same trend continues across Apple’s notebook lineup. The MacBook Air M5 now starts at ₹1,49,900 instead of ₹1,19,900, while the base 14-inch MacBook Pro M5 has jumped from ₹1,69,900 to ₹2,39,900. The top-end MacBook Pro M5 Max now costs ₹4,99,900, up from ₹3,99,900. Even Apple’s home products haven’t escaped the price revision. The HomePod now costs ₹44,900, the HomePod mini is priced at ₹15,900, and the Apple TV 4K lineup has received one of the steepest hikes, with the 64GB model increasing from ₹14,900 to ₹25,900. #Apple #Increased #MacBook #iPad #Pricesapple

and iPad models in India. The updated prices show an increase of around 20% to 42% across many devices. However, the company has not increased iPhone prices at this stage. Apple says the rapid rise in costs of memory and storage components, driven by growing AI demand, led to the decision.

Why Did Apple Increase MacBook and iPad Prices?

Why Has Apple Increased MacBook and iPad Prices by Up to ₹70,000? Apple has announced a major price hike for several MacBook and iPad models in India. The updated prices show an increase of around 20% to 42% across many devices. However, the company has not increased iPhone prices at this stage. Apple says the rapid rise in costs of memory and storage components, driven by growing AI demand, led to the decision. Why Did Apple Increase MacBook and iPad Prices? This price increase has been justified by Apple due to rising costs of producing its products. Specifically, the prices of memory and storage have risen due to strong demand from AI data centers. These components are used in nearly every Mac and iPad. According to Apple, the cost of memory chips and RAM has increased rapidly over the past several months. The company said it absorbed these higher expenses before deciding to revise product prices. Apple believes the current rise in component costs is unlike anything it has seen before. Although iPhone prices remain unchanged today, industry analysts expect Apple to review them if production costs continue to rise. Which Apple Products Have Become More Expensive? The price hike isn’t limited to a handful of devices. Almost all of Apple’s hardware lineup in India has become more expensive, including iPads, Macs, MacBooks, HomePods, and even the Apple TV lineup. The only major exception, for now, is the iPhone, whose prices remain unchanged. Among the biggest increases, the base iPad now starts at ₹49,990 instead of ₹34,990, while the iPad Air has jumped from ₹64,900 to ₹89,900. The flagship iPad Pro has also seen a significant hike, with prices now starting at ₹1,39,900. Apple’s Mac lineup has also become noticeably more expensive. The Mac mini M4 now starts at ₹94,900 (up from ₹59,900), while the iMac M4 has climbed to ₹1,74,900 from ₹1,34,900. The Mac Studio has also received a substantial increase, with the M4 Max model now costing ₹2,79,900 and the M3 Ultra variant reaching ₹5,99,900. The same trend continues across Apple’s notebook lineup. The MacBook Air M5 now starts at ₹1,49,900 instead of ₹1,19,900, while the base 14-inch MacBook Pro M5 has jumped from ₹1,69,900 to ₹2,39,900. The top-end MacBook Pro M5 Max now costs ₹4,99,900, up from ₹3,99,900. Even Apple’s home products haven’t escaped the price revision. The HomePod now costs ₹44,900, the HomePod mini is priced at ₹15,900, and the Apple TV 4K lineup has received one of the steepest hikes, with the 64GB model increasing from ₹14,900 to ₹25,900. #Apple #Increased #MacBook #iPad #Pricesapple

This price increase has been justified by Apple due to rising costs of producing its products. Specifically, the prices of memory and storage have risen due to strong demand from AI data centers. These components are used in nearly every Mac and iPad.

According to Apple, the cost of memory chips and RAM has increased rapidly over the past several months. The company said it absorbed these higher expenses before deciding to revise product prices. Apple believes the current rise in component costs is unlike anything it has seen before. Although iPhone prices remain unchanged today, industry analysts expect Apple to review them if production costs continue to rise.

Which Apple Products Have Become More Expensive?

iPad air different colors

The price hike isn’t limited to a handful of devices. Almost all of Apple’s hardware lineup in India has become more expensive, including iPads, Macs, MacBooks, HomePods, and even the Apple TV lineup. The only major exception, for now, is the iPhone, whose prices remain unchanged. Among the biggest increases, the base iPad now starts at ₹49,990 instead of ₹34,990, while the iPad Air has jumped from ₹64,900 to ₹89,900. The flagship iPad Pro has also seen a significant hike, with prices now starting at ₹1,39,900.

Apple’s Mac lineup has also become noticeably more expensive. The Mac mini M4 now starts at ₹94,900 (up from ₹59,900), while the iMac M4 has climbed to ₹1,74,900 from ₹1,34,900. The Mac Studio has also received a substantial increase, with the M4 Max model now costing ₹2,79,900 and the M3 Ultra variant reaching ₹5,99,900. The same trend continues across Apple’s notebook lineup. The MacBook Air M5 now starts at ₹1,49,900 instead of ₹1,19,900, while the base 14-inch MacBook Pro M5 has jumped from ₹1,69,900 to ₹2,39,900. The top-end MacBook Pro M5 Max now costs ₹4,99,900, up from ₹3,99,900.

Even Apple’s home products haven’t escaped the price revision. The HomePod now costs ₹44,900, the HomePod mini is priced at ₹15,900, and the Apple TV 4K lineup has received one of the steepest hikes, with the 64GB model increasing from ₹14,900 to ₹25,900.

#Apple #Increased #MacBook #iPad #Pricesapple">Why Has Apple Increased MacBook and iPad Prices by Up to ₹70,000?

Apple has announced a major price hike for several MacBook and iPad models in India. The updated prices show an increase of around 20% to 42% across many devices. However, the company has not increased iPhone prices at this stage. Apple says the rapid rise in costs of memory and storage components, driven by growing AI demand, led to the decision.

Why Did Apple Increase MacBook and iPad Prices?

Why Has Apple Increased MacBook and iPad Prices by Up to ₹70,000? Apple has announced a major price hike for several MacBook and iPad models in India. The updated prices show an increase of around 20% to 42% across many devices. However, the company has not increased iPhone prices at this stage. Apple says the rapid rise in costs of memory and storage components, driven by growing AI demand, led to the decision. Why Did Apple Increase MacBook and iPad Prices? This price increase has been justified by Apple due to rising costs of producing its products. Specifically, the prices of memory and storage have risen due to strong demand from AI data centers. These components are used in nearly every Mac and iPad. According to Apple, the cost of memory chips and RAM has increased rapidly over the past several months. The company said it absorbed these higher expenses before deciding to revise product prices. Apple believes the current rise in component costs is unlike anything it has seen before. Although iPhone prices remain unchanged today, industry analysts expect Apple to review them if production costs continue to rise. Which Apple Products Have Become More Expensive? The price hike isn’t limited to a handful of devices. Almost all of Apple’s hardware lineup in India has become more expensive, including iPads, Macs, MacBooks, HomePods, and even the Apple TV lineup. The only major exception, for now, is the iPhone, whose prices remain unchanged. Among the biggest increases, the base iPad now starts at ₹49,990 instead of ₹34,990, while the iPad Air has jumped from ₹64,900 to ₹89,900. The flagship iPad Pro has also seen a significant hike, with prices now starting at ₹1,39,900. Apple’s Mac lineup has also become noticeably more expensive. The Mac mini M4 now starts at ₹94,900 (up from ₹59,900), while the iMac M4 has climbed to ₹1,74,900 from ₹1,34,900. The Mac Studio has also received a substantial increase, with the M4 Max model now costing ₹2,79,900 and the M3 Ultra variant reaching ₹5,99,900. The same trend continues across Apple’s notebook lineup. The MacBook Air M5 now starts at ₹1,49,900 instead of ₹1,19,900, while the base 14-inch MacBook Pro M5 has jumped from ₹1,69,900 to ₹2,39,900. The top-end MacBook Pro M5 Max now costs ₹4,99,900, up from ₹3,99,900. Even Apple’s home products haven’t escaped the price revision. The HomePod now costs ₹44,900, the HomePod mini is priced at ₹15,900, and the Apple TV 4K lineup has received one of the steepest hikes, with the 64GB model increasing from ₹14,900 to ₹25,900. #Apple #Increased #MacBook #iPad #Pricesapple

This price increase has been justified by Apple due to rising costs of producing its products. Specifically, the prices of memory and storage have risen due to strong demand from AI data centers. These components are used in nearly every Mac and iPad.

According to Apple, the cost of memory chips and RAM has increased rapidly over the past several months. The company said it absorbed these higher expenses before deciding to revise product prices. Apple believes the current rise in component costs is unlike anything it has seen before. Although iPhone prices remain unchanged today, industry analysts expect Apple to review them if production costs continue to rise.

Which Apple Products Have Become More Expensive?

iPad air different colors

The price hike isn’t limited to a handful of devices. Almost all of Apple’s hardware lineup in India has become more expensive, including iPads, Macs, MacBooks, HomePods, and even the Apple TV lineup. The only major exception, for now, is the iPhone, whose prices remain unchanged. Among the biggest increases, the base iPad now starts at ₹49,990 instead of ₹34,990, while the iPad Air has jumped from ₹64,900 to ₹89,900. The flagship iPad Pro has also seen a significant hike, with prices now starting at ₹1,39,900.

Apple’s Mac lineup has also become noticeably more expensive. The Mac mini M4 now starts at ₹94,900 (up from ₹59,900), while the iMac M4 has climbed to ₹1,74,900 from ₹1,34,900. The Mac Studio has also received a substantial increase, with the M4 Max model now costing ₹2,79,900 and the M3 Ultra variant reaching ₹5,99,900. The same trend continues across Apple’s notebook lineup. The MacBook Air M5 now starts at ₹1,49,900 instead of ₹1,19,900, while the base 14-inch MacBook Pro M5 has jumped from ₹1,69,900 to ₹2,39,900. The top-end MacBook Pro M5 Max now costs ₹4,99,900, up from ₹3,99,900.

Even Apple’s home products haven’t escaped the price revision. The HomePod now costs ₹44,900, the HomePod mini is priced at ₹15,900, and the Apple TV 4K lineup has received one of the steepest hikes, with the 64GB model increasing from ₹14,900 to ₹25,900.

#Apple #Increased #MacBook #iPad #Pricesapple

Backrooms, the surprise hit of the summer, wants you back in the room. And by room, we mean theater. Its distributor, A24, is reportedly gearing up to release a new version of the film with 15 extra minutes of footage starting on July 3.

According to the AMC Theaters website, the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition “includes 15 minutes of new, theatrically exclusive post-credit bonus footage from [director] Kane Parsons.”

What exactly is in that footage, we don’t know, and surely A24 is hoping you go to the theater to find out. We would be very, very surprised, though, if it expands too greatly on the mythology of the world or its creepy, ambiguous ending. That’s certainly the hope, but with a sequel almost certainly on the way, we’d imagine most secrets will be held until then. And yet, what about Backrooms has been traditional so far? We’re just speculating. It could very well be a whole new ending with twists and turns about what exactly the backrooms are, where they came from, and what their purpose is.

The move comes as the summer season really heats up with the upcoming releases of Minions & Monsters, The Odyssey, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day over the next few weeks. Currently, Backrooms sits at about $185 million domestically but grossed only about $4 million this past weekend, good enough for sixth place.

Adding additional footage to get a few more repeat viewings is probably aimed at crossing the $200 million mark domestically, which would be an incredible feat. Not that grossing over $185 million in the U.S. and over $330 million worldwide isn’t already an incredible feat on its own.

Are you ready to head back to the theater to see more Backrooms? Is there anything that could be added that would be a disappointment? Let us know below. And to check if the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition is coming to your local theater, check its ticketing website.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#Backrooms #Adding #Rooms #FootageBackrooms,Kane Parsons">‘Backrooms’ Wants You Back and Is Adding More Rooms (Footage) Backrooms, the surprise hit of the summer, wants you back in the room. And by room, we mean theater. Its distributor, A24, is reportedly gearing up to release a new version of the film with 15 extra minutes of footage starting on July 3. According to the AMC Theaters website, the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition “includes 15 minutes of new, theatrically exclusive post-credit bonus footage from [director] Kane Parsons.” What exactly is in that footage, we don’t know, and surely A24 is hoping you go to the theater to find out. We would be very, very surprised, though, if it expands too greatly on the mythology of the world or its creepy, ambiguous ending. That’s certainly the hope, but with a sequel almost certainly on the way, we’d imagine most secrets will be held until then. And yet, what about Backrooms has been traditional so far? We’re just speculating. It could very well be a whole new ending with twists and turns about what exactly the backrooms are, where they came from, and what their purpose is. The move comes as the summer season really heats up with the upcoming releases of Minions & Monsters, The Odyssey, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day over the next few weeks. Currently, Backrooms sits at about 5 million domestically but grossed only about million this past weekend, good enough for sixth place. Adding additional footage to get a few more repeat viewings is probably aimed at crossing the 0 million mark domestically, which would be an incredible feat. Not that grossing over 5 million in the U.S. and over 0 million worldwide isn’t already an incredible feat on its own. Are you ready to head back to the theater to see more Backrooms? Is there anything that could be added that would be a disappointment? Let us know below. And to check if the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition is coming to your local theater, check its ticketing website. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. #Backrooms #Adding #Rooms #FootageBackrooms,Kane Parsons

Backrooms, the surprise hit of the summer, wants you back in the room. And by room, we mean theater. Its distributor, A24, is reportedly gearing up to release a new version of the film with 15 extra minutes of footage starting on July 3.

According to the AMC Theaters website, the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition “includes 15 minutes of new, theatrically exclusive post-credit bonus footage from [director] Kane Parsons.”

What exactly is in that footage, we don’t know, and surely A24 is hoping you go to the theater to find out. We would be very, very surprised, though, if it expands too greatly on the mythology of the world or its creepy, ambiguous ending. That’s certainly the hope, but with a sequel almost certainly on the way, we’d imagine most secrets will be held until then. And yet, what about Backrooms has been traditional so far? We’re just speculating. It could very well be a whole new ending with twists and turns about what exactly the backrooms are, where they came from, and what their purpose is.

The move comes as the summer season really heats up with the upcoming releases of Minions & Monsters, The Odyssey, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day over the next few weeks. Currently, Backrooms sits at about $185 million domestically but grossed only about $4 million this past weekend, good enough for sixth place.

Adding additional footage to get a few more repeat viewings is probably aimed at crossing the $200 million mark domestically, which would be an incredible feat. Not that grossing over $185 million in the U.S. and over $330 million worldwide isn’t already an incredible feat on its own.

Are you ready to head back to the theater to see more Backrooms? Is there anything that could be added that would be a disappointment? Let us know below. And to check if the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition is coming to your local theater, check its ticketing website.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#Backrooms #Adding #Rooms #FootageBackrooms,Kane Parsons">‘Backrooms’ Wants You Back and Is Adding More Rooms (Footage)‘Backrooms’ Wants You Back and Is Adding More Rooms (Footage) Backrooms, the surprise hit of the summer, wants you back in the room. And by room, we mean theater. Its distributor, A24, is reportedly gearing up to release a new version of the film with 15 extra minutes of footage starting on July 3. According to the AMC Theaters website, the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition “includes 15 minutes of new, theatrically exclusive post-credit bonus footage from [director] Kane Parsons.” What exactly is in that footage, we don’t know, and surely A24 is hoping you go to the theater to find out. We would be very, very surprised, though, if it expands too greatly on the mythology of the world or its creepy, ambiguous ending. That’s certainly the hope, but with a sequel almost certainly on the way, we’d imagine most secrets will be held until then. And yet, what about Backrooms has been traditional so far? We’re just speculating. It could very well be a whole new ending with twists and turns about what exactly the backrooms are, where they came from, and what their purpose is. The move comes as the summer season really heats up with the upcoming releases of Minions & Monsters, The Odyssey, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day over the next few weeks. Currently, Backrooms sits at about $185 million domestically but grossed only about $4 million this past weekend, good enough for sixth place. Adding additional footage to get a few more repeat viewings is probably aimed at crossing the $200 million mark domestically, which would be an incredible feat. Not that grossing over $185 million in the U.S. and over $330 million worldwide isn’t already an incredible feat on its own. Are you ready to head back to the theater to see more Backrooms? Is there anything that could be added that would be a disappointment? Let us know below. And to check if the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition is coming to your local theater, check its ticketing website. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. #Backrooms #Adding #Rooms #FootageBackrooms,Kane Parsons

Backrooms, the surprise hit of the summer, wants you back in the room. And by room, we mean theater. Its distributor, A24, is reportedly gearing up to release a new version of the film with 15 extra minutes of footage starting on July 3.

According to the AMC Theaters website, the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition “includes 15 minutes of new, theatrically exclusive post-credit bonus footage from [director] Kane Parsons.”

What exactly is in that footage, we don’t know, and surely A24 is hoping you go to the theater to find out. We would be very, very surprised, though, if it expands too greatly on the mythology of the world or its creepy, ambiguous ending. That’s certainly the hope, but with a sequel almost certainly on the way, we’d imagine most secrets will be held until then. And yet, what about Backrooms has been traditional so far? We’re just speculating. It could very well be a whole new ending with twists and turns about what exactly the backrooms are, where they came from, and what their purpose is.

The move comes as the summer season really heats up with the upcoming releases of Minions & Monsters, The Odyssey, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day over the next few weeks. Currently, Backrooms sits at about $185 million domestically but grossed only about $4 million this past weekend, good enough for sixth place.

Adding additional footage to get a few more repeat viewings is probably aimed at crossing the $200 million mark domestically, which would be an incredible feat. Not that grossing over $185 million in the U.S. and over $330 million worldwide isn’t already an incredible feat on its own.

Are you ready to head back to the theater to see more Backrooms? Is there anything that could be added that would be a disappointment? Let us know below. And to check if the Backrooms: Everything Must Go Edition is coming to your local theater, check its ticketing website.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#Backrooms #Adding #Rooms #FootageBackrooms,Kane Parsons

Post Comment