×
PBKS vs MI, IPL 2026: Shardul Thakur four-for catches Punjab Kings off guard in Dharamshala  There’s a certain inevitability about Shardul Thakur. He may not play half the games in a season, concede 15 runs off his first over – like he did against Punjab Kings in Dharamshala – and yet, produce moments of brilliance that turn a game on its head. He’s called ‘Lord’ Thakur and he lives up to his reputation.On Thursday, playing just his seventh game in IPL 2026, Shardul took four for 39 and brought a flourishing PBKS innings to a grinding halt, thus tilting the contest in Mumbai Indians’ favour.“It feels good to be back. You know, it’s not easy to sit out. But yes, the nature of the tournament is such where you have 25 players in the squad, lots of options. So, sometimes you’ve got to take it in your stride,” Shardul said.From his very first over, there was a spring in his step. The confidence of having captain and fellow pacer Jasprit Bumrah standing at mid off might have helped. There were lengthy discussions and arms flailing, asking fielders to move and adjust their angles. “I think I have my comfort level with him. We had a lot of discussions; I don’t know much about the other bowlers. But of course, he’s never shy of sharing his ideas,” Shardul said.READ | Our destiny is still in our hands, says Haddin as PBKS playoff hopes hang by a threadHowever, the start was far from ideal. Prabhsimran was settled and he simply used the pace to nudge the ball in gaps and pick boundaries. Shardul had to wait six overs for his next chance and on the very first delivery, Prabhsimran shuffled across the stumps and whipped him over square leg.“I knew that it was the fifth over where Punjab’s batters would also try to attack. And it was possible that I would go for more runs. But the T20 game is also like that. Sometimes, you have the intention to bowl good length but the batter plays a good shot. And Dharamshala is a venue that is at a high altitude. So, many times, the shot that might get the batter out on the boundary line at other stadiums, can go for six here,” Shardul said.But Shardul has the ability to catch you off guard when you least expect it.By the 11th over, MI’s insistence to hit the hard length was no longer a secret. It is what Prabhsimran was expecting, and hence, standing in his crease to play off his back foot. On the second delivery, Shardul threw a floater on a slightly fuller length. The result: Prabhsimran was left adjusting for length at the last instance and could only hand a top edge to deep third man.Shreyas Iyer punched his first delivery through point for four, but could do little more than stare at the pitch when the next delivery, a cross-seamed one, hit the pitch and nipped away to peg back his off stump.“I think there were too many ups and downs in this game. In PowerPlay, we started really well. But then, at the back end of the PowerPlay and at the start of the middle overs, there were few runs flowing. The tempo was constantly changing. So, as bowlers, it’s very difficult to keep coming back and bowling good deliveries. Because suddenly, there is a shift in tempo.“You think what are my shutdown options? Then, suddenly, there is a fall of one or two wickets and then you are looking for wickets. So, there were too many switches in the game itself. So, in that way, bowlers had to shift their mindset quite a lot,” Shardul said after the game.From 107 for one, PBKS was left at 111 for three in the space of six deliveries. The home side lost another two wickets in the next two overs and had been halted in its tracks. Shardul stuck to his cross-seamed deliveries and prised out another wicket in the 17th over, this time castling Marco Jansen by extracting the low bounce off the surface.“I wouldn’t say I was too happy with my bowling. I think I could have conceded six-seven runs fewer than what I did. But the four wickets that I took, yes, I am happy with that. I am happier that I was able to take those in a winning cause,” Shardul said.PBKS eked out a few bonus runs at the death by bringing in Vishnu Vinod as Impact Player. But Tilak Varma put up a show of his steely resolve to get MI over the line in chasing 201.“Kudos to Tilak, the way he held his nerve. He spent the time in the middle and looked to bat all 20 overs. And he selected his balls, he selected his areas where he needed to hit. And also, to start with, [Ryan] Rickleton, the way he provided us runs in the PowerPlay,” Shardul said.Published on May 15, 2026  #PBKS #IPL #Shardul #Thakur #fourfor #catches #Punjab #Kings #guard #Dharamshala

PBKS vs MI, IPL 2026: Shardul Thakur four-for catches Punjab Kings off guard in Dharamshala

There’s a certain inevitability about Shardul Thakur. He may not play half the games in a season, concede 15 runs off his first over – like he did against Punjab Kings in Dharamshala – and yet, produce moments of brilliance that turn a game on its head. He’s called ‘Lord’ Thakur and he lives up to his reputation.

On Thursday, playing just his seventh game in IPL 2026, Shardul took four for 39 and brought a flourishing PBKS innings to a grinding halt, thus tilting the contest in Mumbai Indians’ favour.

“It feels good to be back. You know, it’s not easy to sit out. But yes, the nature of the tournament is such where you have 25 players in the squad, lots of options. So, sometimes you’ve got to take it in your stride,” Shardul said.

From his very first over, there was a spring in his step. The confidence of having captain and fellow pacer Jasprit Bumrah standing at mid off might have helped. There were lengthy discussions and arms flailing, asking fielders to move and adjust their angles. “I think I have my comfort level with him. We had a lot of discussions; I don’t know much about the other bowlers. But of course, he’s never shy of sharing his ideas,” Shardul said.

READ | Our destiny is still in our hands, says Haddin as PBKS playoff hopes hang by a thread

However, the start was far from ideal. Prabhsimran was settled and he simply used the pace to nudge the ball in gaps and pick boundaries. Shardul had to wait six overs for his next chance and on the very first delivery, Prabhsimran shuffled across the stumps and whipped him over square leg.

“I knew that it was the fifth over where Punjab’s batters would also try to attack. And it was possible that I would go for more runs. But the T20 game is also like that. Sometimes, you have the intention to bowl good length but the batter plays a good shot. And Dharamshala is a venue that is at a high altitude. So, many times, the shot that might get the batter out on the boundary line at other stadiums, can go for six here,” Shardul said.

But Shardul has the ability to catch you off guard when you least expect it.

By the 11th over, MI’s insistence to hit the hard length was no longer a secret. It is what Prabhsimran was expecting, and hence, standing in his crease to play off his back foot. On the second delivery, Shardul threw a floater on a slightly fuller length. The result: Prabhsimran was left adjusting for length at the last instance and could only hand a top edge to deep third man.

Shreyas Iyer punched his first delivery through point for four, but could do little more than stare at the pitch when the next delivery, a cross-seamed one, hit the pitch and nipped away to peg back his off stump.

“I think there were too many ups and downs in this game. In PowerPlay, we started really well. But then, at the back end of the PowerPlay and at the start of the middle overs, there were few runs flowing. The tempo was constantly changing. So, as bowlers, it’s very difficult to keep coming back and bowling good deliveries. Because suddenly, there is a shift in tempo.

“You think what are my shutdown options? Then, suddenly, there is a fall of one or two wickets and then you are looking for wickets. So, there were too many switches in the game itself. So, in that way, bowlers had to shift their mindset quite a lot,” Shardul said after the game.

From 107 for one, PBKS was left at 111 for three in the space of six deliveries. The home side lost another two wickets in the next two overs and had been halted in its tracks. Shardul stuck to his cross-seamed deliveries and prised out another wicket in the 17th over, this time castling Marco Jansen by extracting the low bounce off the surface.

“I wouldn’t say I was too happy with my bowling. I think I could have conceded six-seven runs fewer than what I did. But the four wickets that I took, yes, I am happy with that. I am happier that I was able to take those in a winning cause,” Shardul said.

PBKS eked out a few bonus runs at the death by bringing in Vishnu Vinod as Impact Player. But Tilak Varma put up a show of his steely resolve to get MI over the line in chasing 201.

“Kudos to Tilak, the way he held his nerve. He spent the time in the middle and looked to bat all 20 overs. And he selected his balls, he selected his areas where he needed to hit. And also, to start with, [Ryan] Rickleton, the way he provided us runs in the PowerPlay,” Shardul said.

Published on May 15, 2026

#PBKS #IPL #Shardul #Thakur #fourfor #catches #Punjab #Kings #guard #Dharamshala

There’s a certain inevitability about Shardul Thakur. He may not play half the games in a season, concede 15 runs off his first over – like he did against Punjab Kings in Dharamshala – and yet, produce moments of brilliance that turn a game on its head. He’s called ‘Lord’ Thakur and he lives up to his reputation.

On Thursday, playing just his seventh game in IPL 2026, Shardul took four for 39 and brought a flourishing PBKS innings to a grinding halt, thus tilting the contest in Mumbai Indians’ favour.

“It feels good to be back. You know, it’s not easy to sit out. But yes, the nature of the tournament is such where you have 25 players in the squad, lots of options. So, sometimes you’ve got to take it in your stride,” Shardul said.

From his very first over, there was a spring in his step. The confidence of having captain and fellow pacer Jasprit Bumrah standing at mid off might have helped. There were lengthy discussions and arms flailing, asking fielders to move and adjust their angles. “I think I have my comfort level with him. We had a lot of discussions; I don’t know much about the other bowlers. But of course, he’s never shy of sharing his ideas,” Shardul said.

READ | Our destiny is still in our hands, says Haddin as PBKS playoff hopes hang by a thread

However, the start was far from ideal. Prabhsimran was settled and he simply used the pace to nudge the ball in gaps and pick boundaries. Shardul had to wait six overs for his next chance and on the very first delivery, Prabhsimran shuffled across the stumps and whipped him over square leg.

“I knew that it was the fifth over where Punjab’s batters would also try to attack. And it was possible that I would go for more runs. But the T20 game is also like that. Sometimes, you have the intention to bowl good length but the batter plays a good shot. And Dharamshala is a venue that is at a high altitude. So, many times, the shot that might get the batter out on the boundary line at other stadiums, can go for six here,” Shardul said.

But Shardul has the ability to catch you off guard when you least expect it.

By the 11th over, MI’s insistence to hit the hard length was no longer a secret. It is what Prabhsimran was expecting, and hence, standing in his crease to play off his back foot. On the second delivery, Shardul threw a floater on a slightly fuller length. The result: Prabhsimran was left adjusting for length at the last instance and could only hand a top edge to deep third man.

Shreyas Iyer punched his first delivery through point for four, but could do little more than stare at the pitch when the next delivery, a cross-seamed one, hit the pitch and nipped away to peg back his off stump.

“I think there were too many ups and downs in this game. In PowerPlay, we started really well. But then, at the back end of the PowerPlay and at the start of the middle overs, there were few runs flowing. The tempo was constantly changing. So, as bowlers, it’s very difficult to keep coming back and bowling good deliveries. Because suddenly, there is a shift in tempo.

“You think what are my shutdown options? Then, suddenly, there is a fall of one or two wickets and then you are looking for wickets. So, there were too many switches in the game itself. So, in that way, bowlers had to shift their mindset quite a lot,” Shardul said after the game.

From 107 for one, PBKS was left at 111 for three in the space of six deliveries. The home side lost another two wickets in the next two overs and had been halted in its tracks. Shardul stuck to his cross-seamed deliveries and prised out another wicket in the 17th over, this time castling Marco Jansen by extracting the low bounce off the surface.

“I wouldn’t say I was too happy with my bowling. I think I could have conceded six-seven runs fewer than what I did. But the four wickets that I took, yes, I am happy with that. I am happier that I was able to take those in a winning cause,” Shardul said.

PBKS eked out a few bonus runs at the death by bringing in Vishnu Vinod as Impact Player. But Tilak Varma put up a show of his steely resolve to get MI over the line in chasing 201.

“Kudos to Tilak, the way he held his nerve. He spent the time in the middle and looked to bat all 20 overs. And he selected his balls, he selected his areas where he needed to hit. And also, to start with, [Ryan] Rickleton, the way he provided us runs in the PowerPlay,” Shardul said.

Published on May 15, 2026

Source link
#PBKS #IPL #Shardul #Thakur #fourfor #catches #Punjab #Kings #guard #Dharamshala

Deadspin | Layne Riggs wins wild NASCAR Truck debut race at Naval Base Coronado  NASCAR Truck Series driver Layne Riggs (34) races during the Allegiance 200 at Nashville Superspeedway in Lebanon, Tenn., Friday, May 29, 2026.   CORONADO, Calif.– Short on fuel and long on perseverance and good fortune, Layne Riggs won Friday’s inaugural Navy 250 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series race at Naval Base Coronado on the Qualcomm Circuit.  It wasn’t until the final two corners of overtime that Riggs was able to claim his fourth victory of the season and the ninth of his career. The driver of the No. 34 Front Row Racing Ford was running second behind Tyler Reif entering the chicane that precedes the final corner at the 3.4-mile, 16-turn street circuit.  Under pressure from Riggs, Reif blew the chicane, steered to the inside of the tire barriers defining the racing line and came to a stop after exiting. Riggs grabbed the lead and reached the finish line 1.332 seconds ahead of runner-up Daniel Hemric, who ran the final circuit with a tire losing air.  “Layne van Risberger came to play today, man,” Riggs chortled after climbing from his car — a facetious reference to road course superstar Shane van Gisbergen in the NASCAR Cup Series. “We’re undefeated in street course races — much respect, Shane. I hope I can be as good as you one day, man. I’m going to take all my glory here in the truck series.  “I don’t even know what happened at the end — sparks flying, people wrecking, staying in the throttle. I was running out of fuel the entire last lap. It was like St. Pete all over again (an earlier Riggs victory this season in an inaugural street race).”  Entering the chicane on the final lap, Riggs was trying to force Reif into a mistake — and succeeded.  “I faked left to scare him, and he missed the corner,” Riggs said. “I really wasn’t going to dive it in there, and it worked for me … An amazing, historic win.”  Reif was trying to win in only his seventh start in the series. He finished 19th after being assessed a 30-second penalty for short-cutting the course on the final lap.  “I hear (Riggs was) one (car-length) back from me, and I didn’t want to give him a chance to get to me,” Reif said. “It was my mistake. It’s very unfortunate that I did that. I don’t know how many more chances I’ll have like this, but I’m sure there’ll be more, and I’m going to make sure not to make that mistake again.”  The final two laps featured a surfeit of twists and turns. Superior strategy put Chandler Smith at the front of the field for the overtime restart on Lap 52, with fresher tires and more fuel than Riggs, his teammate.  Smith led the field to green with Kaden Honeycutt beside him, but Honeycutt brushed the wall on the downhill run toward Turn 2, and Smith crashed trying to avoid him. As cars bounced off each other behind them, Henric took the lead briefly, only to be challenged and passed by Reif, who blocked Hemric’s Chevrolet into the wall approaching the chicane on the white-flag lap.  Reif held the lead from that point on until his mistake in the tight, freshly-paved chicane. In the overtime melee, Kaz Grala finished third, followed by Landen Lewis (a career best) and Ty Majeski.  Smith and Honeycutt ran 22nd and 23rd, respectively. Seven-time NASCAR Cup champion Jimmie Johnson led two laps but finished 30th after spinning twice and losing power in the final stage. Johnson was making his second start in the series, 18 years removed from his first.  The race featured 16 lead changes among six drivers, with Riggs leading a race-high 21 circuits and Smith 13. There were seven cautions for 13 laps.  Riggs, who won the first stage, increased his series lead to 65 points over Honeycutt, with Smith trailing by 128 points in third place with five events left in the Truck Series regular season. Parker Kligerman won Stage 2 before finishing 18th.  NASCAR CRAFTSMAN Truck Series Race — Navy 250  San Diego Street Course  San Diego, California  Friday, June 19, 2026  1. (2) Layne Riggs, Ford, 53.  2. (32) Daniel Hemric, Chevrolet, 53.  3. (16) Kaz Grala, Toyota, 53.  4. (9) Landen Lewis, Chevrolet, 53.  5. (8) Ty Majeski, Ford, 53.  6. (17) Justin Haley, RAM, 53.  7. (34) Brenden Queen #, RAM, 53.  8. (13) Ben Rhodes, Ford, 53.  9. (30) Christian Eckes, Chevrolet, 53.  10. (6) Giovanni Ruggiero, Toyota, 53.  11. (23) Mini Tyrrell #, RAM, 53.  12. (35) Tanner Gray, Toyota, 53.  13. (24) Kris Wright, Chevrolet, 53.   14. (33) Adam Andretti, Toyota, 53.  15. (25) Cole Butcher #, Ford, 53.  16. (28) Brendan Gaughan, Chevrolet, 53.  17. (29) Austin Varco, Ford, 53.  18. (10) Parker Kligerman, Chevrolet, 53.  19. (14) Tyler Reif, Chevrolet, 53.  20. (27) Frankie Muniz, Ford, 53.  21. (7) Andres Perez De Lara, Chevrolet, 53.  22. (3) Chandler Smith, Ford, 53.  23. (1) Kaden Honeycutt, Toyota, Accident, 52.  24. (11) Connor Mosack, Chevrolet, 52.  25. (31) Justin Marks, Chevrolet, 51.  26. (18) Dawson Sutton, Chevrolet, 51.  27. (26) Jackson Lee, Ford, 50.  28. (20) Nathan Nicholson, Chevrolet, Accident, 48.  29. (5) Grant Enfinger, Chevrolet, 48.  30. (4) Jimmie Johnson(i), Toyota, Electrical, 47.  31. (12) Tyler Ankrum, Chevrolet, Accident, 46.  32. (19) Jake Garcia, Ford, Transmission, 40.  33. (22) Stewart Friesen, Toyota, Power Steering, 29.  34. (21) Jamie McMurray, RAM, Accident, 22.  35. (15) Corey LaJoie, RAM, Accident, 14.  Average Speed of Race Winner: 64.274 mph.  Time of Race: 2 Hrs, 48 Mins, 13 Secs. Margin of Victory: 1.332 Seconds.  Caution Flags: 7 for 13 laps.  Lead Changes: 16 among 6 drivers.  Lap Leaders: K. Honeycutt 1-2;L. Riggs 3-5;K. Honeycutt 6;L. Riggs 7-12;K. Honeycutt 13-16;J. Johnson(i) 17-18;C. Smith 19;P. Kligerman 20;L. Riggs 21;P. Kligerman 22-26;C. Smith 27;K. Honeycutt 28-30;C. Smith 31-33;L. Riggs 34-43;C. Smith 44-51;T. Reif 52;L. Riggs 53.  Leaders Summary (Driver, Times Lead, Laps Led): Layne Riggs 5 times for 21 laps; Chandler Smith 4 times for 13 laps; Kaden Honeycutt 4 times for 10 laps; Parker Kligerman 2 times for 6 laps; Jimmie Johnson(i) 1 time for 2 laps; Tyler Reif 1 time for 1 lap.  Stage #1 Top Ten: 34,11,1,38,9,18,99,44,45,42  Stage #2 Top Ten: 75,88,9,18,44,42,38,11,1,91  –By Spencer Reid, NASCAR Wire Service. Special to Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Layne #Riggs #wins #wild #NASCAR #Truck #debut #race #Naval #Base #CoronadoNASCAR Truck Series driver Layne Riggs (34) races during the Allegiance 200 at Nashville Superspeedway in Lebanon, Tenn., Friday, May 29, 2026.

CORONADO, Calif.– Short on fuel and long on perseverance and good fortune, Layne Riggs won Friday’s inaugural Navy 250 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series race at Naval Base Coronado on the Qualcomm Circuit.

It wasn’t until the final two corners of overtime that Riggs was able to claim his fourth victory of the season and the ninth of his career. The driver of the No. 34 Front Row Racing Ford was running second behind Tyler Reif entering the chicane that precedes the final corner at the 3.4-mile, 16-turn street circuit.

Under pressure from Riggs, Reif blew the chicane, steered to the inside of the tire barriers defining the racing line and came to a stop after exiting. Riggs grabbed the lead and reached the finish line 1.332 seconds ahead of runner-up Daniel Hemric, who ran the final circuit with a tire losing air.

“Layne van Risberger came to play today, man,” Riggs chortled after climbing from his car — a facetious reference to road course superstar Shane van Gisbergen in the NASCAR Cup Series. “We’re undefeated in street course races — much respect, Shane. I hope I can be as good as you one day, man. I’m going to take all my glory here in the truck series.

“I don’t even know what happened at the end — sparks flying, people wrecking, staying in the throttle. I was running out of fuel the entire last lap. It was like St. Pete all over again (an earlier Riggs victory this season in an inaugural street race).”

Entering the chicane on the final lap, Riggs was trying to force Reif into a mistake — and succeeded.

“I faked left to scare him, and he missed the corner,” Riggs said. “I really wasn’t going to dive it in there, and it worked for me … An amazing, historic win.”

Reif was trying to win in only his seventh start in the series. He finished 19th after being assessed a 30-second penalty for short-cutting the course on the final lap.

“I hear (Riggs was) one (car-length) back from me, and I didn’t want to give him a chance to get to me,” Reif said. “It was my mistake. It’s very unfortunate that I did that. I don’t know how many more chances I’ll have like this, but I’m sure there’ll be more, and I’m going to make sure not to make that mistake again.”

The final two laps featured a surfeit of twists and turns. Superior strategy put Chandler Smith at the front of the field for the overtime restart on Lap 52, with fresher tires and more fuel than Riggs, his teammate.

Smith led the field to green with Kaden Honeycutt beside him, but Honeycutt brushed the wall on the downhill run toward Turn 2, and Smith crashed trying to avoid him. As cars bounced off each other behind them, Henric took the lead briefly, only to be challenged and passed by Reif, who blocked Hemric’s Chevrolet into the wall approaching the chicane on the white-flag lap.

Reif held the lead from that point on until his mistake in the tight, freshly-paved chicane. In the overtime melee, Kaz Grala finished third, followed by Landen Lewis (a career best) and Ty Majeski.

Smith and Honeycutt ran 22nd and 23rd, respectively. Seven-time NASCAR Cup champion Jimmie Johnson led two laps but finished 30th after spinning twice and losing power in the final stage. Johnson was making his second start in the series, 18 years removed from his first.

The race featured 16 lead changes among six drivers, with Riggs leading a race-high 21 circuits and Smith 13. There were seven cautions for 13 laps.

Riggs, who won the first stage, increased his series lead to 65 points over Honeycutt, with Smith trailing by 128 points in third place with five events left in the Truck Series regular season. Parker Kligerman won Stage 2 before finishing 18th.

NASCAR CRAFTSMAN Truck Series Race — Navy 250

San Diego Street Course

San Diego, California

Friday, June 19, 2026

1. (2) Layne Riggs, Ford, 53.

2. (32) Daniel Hemric, Chevrolet, 53.

3. (16) Kaz Grala, Toyota, 53.

4. (9) Landen Lewis, Chevrolet, 53.

5. (8) Ty Majeski, Ford, 53.

6. (17) Justin Haley, RAM, 53.

7. (34) Brenden Queen #, RAM, 53.

8. (13) Ben Rhodes, Ford, 53.

9. (30) Christian Eckes, Chevrolet, 53.

10. (6) Giovanni Ruggiero, Toyota, 53.

11. (23) Mini Tyrrell #, RAM, 53.

12. (35) Tanner Gray, Toyota, 53.


13. (24) Kris Wright, Chevrolet, 53.

14. (33) Adam Andretti, Toyota, 53.

15. (25) Cole Butcher #, Ford, 53.

16. (28) Brendan Gaughan, Chevrolet, 53.

17. (29) Austin Varco, Ford, 53.

18. (10) Parker Kligerman, Chevrolet, 53.

19. (14) Tyler Reif, Chevrolet, 53.

20. (27) Frankie Muniz, Ford, 53.

21. (7) Andres Perez De Lara, Chevrolet, 53.

22. (3) Chandler Smith, Ford, 53.

23. (1) Kaden Honeycutt, Toyota, Accident, 52.

24. (11) Connor Mosack, Chevrolet, 52.

25. (31) Justin Marks, Chevrolet, 51.

26. (18) Dawson Sutton, Chevrolet, 51.

27. (26) Jackson Lee, Ford, 50.

28. (20) Nathan Nicholson, Chevrolet, Accident, 48.

29. (5) Grant Enfinger, Chevrolet, 48.

30. (4) Jimmie Johnson(i), Toyota, Electrical, 47.

31. (12) Tyler Ankrum, Chevrolet, Accident, 46.

32. (19) Jake Garcia, Ford, Transmission, 40.

33. (22) Stewart Friesen, Toyota, Power Steering, 29.

34. (21) Jamie McMurray, RAM, Accident, 22.

35. (15) Corey LaJoie, RAM, Accident, 14.

Average Speed of Race Winner: 64.274 mph.

Time of Race: 2 Hrs, 48 Mins, 13 Secs. Margin of Victory: 1.332 Seconds.

Caution Flags: 7 for 13 laps.

Lead Changes: 16 among 6 drivers.

Lap Leaders: K. Honeycutt 1-2;L. Riggs 3-5;K. Honeycutt 6;L. Riggs 7-12;K. Honeycutt 13-16;J. Johnson(i) 17-18;C. Smith 19;P. Kligerman 20;L. Riggs 21;P. Kligerman 22-26;C. Smith 27;K. Honeycutt 28-30;C. Smith 31-33;L. Riggs 34-43;C. Smith 44-51;T. Reif 52;L. Riggs 53.

Leaders Summary (Driver, Times Lead, Laps Led): Layne Riggs 5 times for 21 laps; Chandler Smith 4 times for 13 laps; Kaden Honeycutt 4 times for 10 laps; Parker Kligerman 2 times for 6 laps; Jimmie Johnson(i) 1 time for 2 laps; Tyler Reif 1 time for 1 lap.

Stage #1 Top Ten: 34,11,1,38,9,18,99,44,45,42

Stage #2 Top Ten: 75,88,9,18,44,42,38,11,1,91

–By Spencer Reid, NASCAR Wire Service. Special to Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Layne #Riggs #wins #wild #NASCAR #Truck #debut #race #Naval #Base #Coronado">Deadspin | Layne Riggs wins wild NASCAR Truck debut race at Naval Base Coronado  NASCAR Truck Series driver Layne Riggs (34) races during the Allegiance 200 at Nashville Superspeedway in Lebanon, Tenn., Friday, May 29, 2026.   CORONADO, Calif.– Short on fuel and long on perseverance and good fortune, Layne Riggs won Friday’s inaugural Navy 250 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series race at Naval Base Coronado on the Qualcomm Circuit.  It wasn’t until the final two corners of overtime that Riggs was able to claim his fourth victory of the season and the ninth of his career. The driver of the No. 34 Front Row Racing Ford was running second behind Tyler Reif entering the chicane that precedes the final corner at the 3.4-mile, 16-turn street circuit.  Under pressure from Riggs, Reif blew the chicane, steered to the inside of the tire barriers defining the racing line and came to a stop after exiting. Riggs grabbed the lead and reached the finish line 1.332 seconds ahead of runner-up Daniel Hemric, who ran the final circuit with a tire losing air.  “Layne van Risberger came to play today, man,” Riggs chortled after climbing from his car — a facetious reference to road course superstar Shane van Gisbergen in the NASCAR Cup Series. “We’re undefeated in street course races — much respect, Shane. I hope I can be as good as you one day, man. I’m going to take all my glory here in the truck series.  “I don’t even know what happened at the end — sparks flying, people wrecking, staying in the throttle. I was running out of fuel the entire last lap. It was like St. Pete all over again (an earlier Riggs victory this season in an inaugural street race).”  Entering the chicane on the final lap, Riggs was trying to force Reif into a mistake — and succeeded.  “I faked left to scare him, and he missed the corner,” Riggs said. “I really wasn’t going to dive it in there, and it worked for me … An amazing, historic win.”  Reif was trying to win in only his seventh start in the series. He finished 19th after being assessed a 30-second penalty for short-cutting the course on the final lap.  “I hear (Riggs was) one (car-length) back from me, and I didn’t want to give him a chance to get to me,” Reif said. “It was my mistake. It’s very unfortunate that I did that. I don’t know how many more chances I’ll have like this, but I’m sure there’ll be more, and I’m going to make sure not to make that mistake again.”  The final two laps featured a surfeit of twists and turns. Superior strategy put Chandler Smith at the front of the field for the overtime restart on Lap 52, with fresher tires and more fuel than Riggs, his teammate.  Smith led the field to green with Kaden Honeycutt beside him, but Honeycutt brushed the wall on the downhill run toward Turn 2, and Smith crashed trying to avoid him. As cars bounced off each other behind them, Henric took the lead briefly, only to be challenged and passed by Reif, who blocked Hemric’s Chevrolet into the wall approaching the chicane on the white-flag lap.  Reif held the lead from that point on until his mistake in the tight, freshly-paved chicane. In the overtime melee, Kaz Grala finished third, followed by Landen Lewis (a career best) and Ty Majeski.  Smith and Honeycutt ran 22nd and 23rd, respectively. Seven-time NASCAR Cup champion Jimmie Johnson led two laps but finished 30th after spinning twice and losing power in the final stage. Johnson was making his second start in the series, 18 years removed from his first.  The race featured 16 lead changes among six drivers, with Riggs leading a race-high 21 circuits and Smith 13. There were seven cautions for 13 laps.  Riggs, who won the first stage, increased his series lead to 65 points over Honeycutt, with Smith trailing by 128 points in third place with five events left in the Truck Series regular season. Parker Kligerman won Stage 2 before finishing 18th.  NASCAR CRAFTSMAN Truck Series Race — Navy 250  San Diego Street Course  San Diego, California  Friday, June 19, 2026  1. (2) Layne Riggs, Ford, 53.  2. (32) Daniel Hemric, Chevrolet, 53.  3. (16) Kaz Grala, Toyota, 53.  4. (9) Landen Lewis, Chevrolet, 53.  5. (8) Ty Majeski, Ford, 53.  6. (17) Justin Haley, RAM, 53.  7. (34) Brenden Queen #, RAM, 53.  8. (13) Ben Rhodes, Ford, 53.  9. (30) Christian Eckes, Chevrolet, 53.  10. (6) Giovanni Ruggiero, Toyota, 53.  11. (23) Mini Tyrrell #, RAM, 53.  12. (35) Tanner Gray, Toyota, 53.  13. (24) Kris Wright, Chevrolet, 53.   14. (33) Adam Andretti, Toyota, 53.  15. (25) Cole Butcher #, Ford, 53.  16. (28) Brendan Gaughan, Chevrolet, 53.  17. (29) Austin Varco, Ford, 53.  18. (10) Parker Kligerman, Chevrolet, 53.  19. (14) Tyler Reif, Chevrolet, 53.  20. (27) Frankie Muniz, Ford, 53.  21. (7) Andres Perez De Lara, Chevrolet, 53.  22. (3) Chandler Smith, Ford, 53.  23. (1) Kaden Honeycutt, Toyota, Accident, 52.  24. (11) Connor Mosack, Chevrolet, 52.  25. (31) Justin Marks, Chevrolet, 51.  26. (18) Dawson Sutton, Chevrolet, 51.  27. (26) Jackson Lee, Ford, 50.  28. (20) Nathan Nicholson, Chevrolet, Accident, 48.  29. (5) Grant Enfinger, Chevrolet, 48.  30. (4) Jimmie Johnson(i), Toyota, Electrical, 47.  31. (12) Tyler Ankrum, Chevrolet, Accident, 46.  32. (19) Jake Garcia, Ford, Transmission, 40.  33. (22) Stewart Friesen, Toyota, Power Steering, 29.  34. (21) Jamie McMurray, RAM, Accident, 22.  35. (15) Corey LaJoie, RAM, Accident, 14.  Average Speed of Race Winner: 64.274 mph.  Time of Race: 2 Hrs, 48 Mins, 13 Secs. Margin of Victory: 1.332 Seconds.  Caution Flags: 7 for 13 laps.  Lead Changes: 16 among 6 drivers.  Lap Leaders: K. Honeycutt 1-2;L. Riggs 3-5;K. Honeycutt 6;L. Riggs 7-12;K. Honeycutt 13-16;J. Johnson(i) 17-18;C. Smith 19;P. Kligerman 20;L. Riggs 21;P. Kligerman 22-26;C. Smith 27;K. Honeycutt 28-30;C. Smith 31-33;L. Riggs 34-43;C. Smith 44-51;T. Reif 52;L. Riggs 53.  Leaders Summary (Driver, Times Lead, Laps Led): Layne Riggs 5 times for 21 laps; Chandler Smith 4 times for 13 laps; Kaden Honeycutt 4 times for 10 laps; Parker Kligerman 2 times for 6 laps; Jimmie Johnson(i) 1 time for 2 laps; Tyler Reif 1 time for 1 lap.  Stage #1 Top Ten: 34,11,1,38,9,18,99,44,45,42  Stage #2 Top Ten: 75,88,9,18,44,42,38,11,1,91  –By Spencer Reid, NASCAR Wire Service. Special to Field Level Media   #Deadspin #Layne #Riggs #wins #wild #NASCAR #Truck #debut #race #Naval #Base #Coronado

One of the best stories out of the 2026 World Cup so far is without question Scotland.

Specifically, their supporters, and how they have captured the hearts and minds of Bostonians from the North End to the Back Bay, and points in between.

But on the pitch, Scotland opened with a win in the group stage over Haiti, and ahead of matches on Friday, June 19, they have a chance to clinch a spot in the Round of 32.

Here are all the current clinching scenarios for Group C at the 2026 World Cup.

Update Friday evening: With Morocco’s 1-0 win over Scotland, Scotland cannot clinch a spot in the knockout round. In addition, Haiti can now be eliminated with a loss to Brazil later tonight.

Update Friday night: Brazil’s 3-0 win over Haiti moves Brazil into first place, dropping Morocco into second place and Scotland into third place. Haiti has now been eliminated from knockout round contention.

What are the Group C standings?

Here is where things stand after Morocco-Scotland, and ahead of Haiti-Brazil:

Team

W

D

L

GF

GA

GD

Points

Brazil11041+34
Morocco11021+14
Scotland1011103
Haiti00204-40

What are the next Group C matches?

Here is the rest of the Group C schedule, starting with today’s matches.

Morocco 1, Scotland 0
Brazil 3, Haiti 0

Morocco vs. Haiti
Scotland vs. Brazil

What are the current scenarios for Group C?

These are the scenarios for Group C entering play on Friday, June 19.

Scotland is the only team that can clinch a spot in the knockout round today. With a win over Morocco, they are guaranteed a spot in the Round of 32 as one of the top two teams in Group C.

However, they will win the group and book a match between the second-place team in Group F in the Round of 32 with a win over Morocco, coupled with a Brazil loss or tie against Haiti. Scotland and Brazil face each other in the final group match, and with a win over Morocco, Scotland would improve to six points. Should Brazil then lose or tie against Haiti, they could not jump over Scotland in the standings, even with a win in the final match. At most, Brazil would have five points.

On the flip side, Haiti faces elimination on Friday. Should they lose, a corresponding Morocco win over Scotland means Haiti is eliminated.

The good news? Neither team can be eliminated on Friday. But neither can clinch a spot in the knockout round just yet.

Here is how tiebreakers work at the World Cup this year.

If two or more teams in the same group are equal on points following the group stage, a three-step process will be followed to determine tiebreakers.

In the first step, the greatest number of points in the group matches between the tied teams will be applied. Then, the superior goal difference from the group matches between the tied teams will be applied, and finally, the greatest number of goals scored in all group matches between the tied teams will be applied.

If that cannot determine a tiebreaker, then the teams that are still equal will advance to step two. In this stage, the first step is the goal difference in all group matches, then the greatest number of goals in all group matches, and finally the highest team conduct score (relating to yellow and red cards) will be applied.

If that does not break the tie, then the teams still equal on points will be ranked according to the most recent FIFA World Rankings.

That first step, which reads “greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned” according to FIFA, effectively turns into a head-to-head tiebreaker in the case of ties between two teams.

Tiebreakers do not really factor into Group C head of the matches on Friday, June 19. But depending on those results, they could come into play ahead of the final matches in this group.

#World #Cup #clinching #scenarios #Group">World Cup 2026: What are the clinching scenarios in Group C?  One of the best stories out of the 2026 World Cup so far is without question Scotland.Specifically, their supporters, and how they have captured the hearts and minds of Bostonians from the North End to the Back Bay, and points in between.But on the pitch, Scotland opened with a win in the group stage over Haiti, and ahead of matches on Friday, June 19, they have a chance to clinch a spot in the Round of 32.Here are all the current clinching scenarios for Group C at the 2026 World Cup.Update Friday evening: With Morocco’s 1-0 win over Scotland, Scotland cannot clinch a spot in the knockout round. In addition, Haiti can now be eliminated with a loss to Brazil later tonight.Update Friday night: Brazil’s 3-0 win over Haiti moves Brazil into first place, dropping Morocco into second place and Scotland into third place. Haiti has now been eliminated from knockout round contention.What are the Group C standings?Here is where things stand after Morocco-Scotland, and ahead of Haiti-Brazil:TeamWDLGFGAGDPointsBrazil11041+34Morocco11021+14Scotland1011103Haiti00204-40What are the next Group C matches?Here is the rest of the Group C schedule, starting with today’s matches.Morocco 1, Scotland 0Brazil 3, Haiti 0Morocco vs. HaitiScotland vs. BrazilWhat are the current scenarios for Group C?These are the scenarios for Group C entering play on Friday, June 19.Scotland is the only team that can clinch a spot in the knockout round today. With a win over Morocco, they are guaranteed a spot in the Round of 32 as one of the top two teams in Group C.However, they will win the group and book a match between the second-place team in Group F in the Round of 32 with a win over Morocco, coupled with a Brazil loss or tie against Haiti. Scotland and Brazil face each other in the final group match, and with a win over Morocco, Scotland would improve to six points. Should Brazil then lose or tie against Haiti, they could not jump over Scotland in the standings, even with a win in the final match. At most, Brazil would have five points.On the flip side, Haiti faces elimination on Friday. Should they lose, a corresponding Morocco win over Scotland means Haiti is eliminated.The good news? Neither team can be eliminated on Friday. But neither can clinch a spot in the knockout round just yet.Here is how tiebreakers work at the World Cup this year.If two or more teams in the same group are equal on points following the group stage, a three-step process will be followed to determine tiebreakers.In the first step, the greatest number of points in the group matches between the tied teams will be applied. Then, the superior goal difference from the group matches between the tied teams will be applied, and finally, the greatest number of goals scored in all group matches between the tied teams will be applied.If that cannot determine a tiebreaker, then the teams that are still equal will advance to step two. In this stage, the first step is the goal difference in all group matches, then the greatest number of goals in all group matches, and finally the highest team conduct score (relating to yellow and red cards) will be applied.If that does not break the tie, then the teams still equal on points will be ranked according to the most recent FIFA World Rankings.That first step, which reads “greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned” according to FIFA, effectively turns into a head-to-head tiebreaker in the case of ties between two teams.Tiebreakers do not really factor into Group C head of the matches on Friday, June 19. But depending on those results, they could come into play ahead of the final matches in this group.  #World #Cup #clinching #scenarios #Group

captured the hearts and minds of Bostonians from the North End to the Back Bay, and points in between.

But on the pitch, Scotland opened with a win in the group stage over Haiti, and ahead of matches on Friday, June 19, they have a chance to clinch a spot in the Round of 32.

Here are all the current clinching scenarios for Group C at the 2026 World Cup.

Update Friday evening: With Morocco’s 1-0 win over Scotland, Scotland cannot clinch a spot in the knockout round. In addition, Haiti can now be eliminated with a loss to Brazil later tonight.

Update Friday night: Brazil’s 3-0 win over Haiti moves Brazil into first place, dropping Morocco into second place and Scotland into third place. Haiti has now been eliminated from knockout round contention.

What are the Group C standings?

Here is where things stand after Morocco-Scotland, and ahead of Haiti-Brazil:

Team

W

D

L

GF

GA

GD

Points

Brazil11041+34
Morocco11021+14
Scotland1011103
Haiti00204-40

What are the next Group C matches?

Here is the rest of the Group C schedule, starting with today’s matches.

Morocco 1, Scotland 0
Brazil 3, Haiti 0

Morocco vs. Haiti
Scotland vs. Brazil

What are the current scenarios for Group C?

These are the scenarios for Group C entering play on Friday, June 19.

Scotland is the only team that can clinch a spot in the knockout round today. With a win over Morocco, they are guaranteed a spot in the Round of 32 as one of the top two teams in Group C.

However, they will win the group and book a match between the second-place team in Group F in the Round of 32 with a win over Morocco, coupled with a Brazil loss or tie against Haiti. Scotland and Brazil face each other in the final group match, and with a win over Morocco, Scotland would improve to six points. Should Brazil then lose or tie against Haiti, they could not jump over Scotland in the standings, even with a win in the final match. At most, Brazil would have five points.

On the flip side, Haiti faces elimination on Friday. Should they lose, a corresponding Morocco win over Scotland means Haiti is eliminated.

The good news? Neither team can be eliminated on Friday. But neither can clinch a spot in the knockout round just yet.

Here is how tiebreakers work at the World Cup this year.

If two or more teams in the same group are equal on points following the group stage, a three-step process will be followed to determine tiebreakers.

In the first step, the greatest number of points in the group matches between the tied teams will be applied. Then, the superior goal difference from the group matches between the tied teams will be applied, and finally, the greatest number of goals scored in all group matches between the tied teams will be applied.

If that cannot determine a tiebreaker, then the teams that are still equal will advance to step two. In this stage, the first step is the goal difference in all group matches, then the greatest number of goals in all group matches, and finally the highest team conduct score (relating to yellow and red cards) will be applied.

If that does not break the tie, then the teams still equal on points will be ranked according to the most recent FIFA World Rankings.

That first step, which reads “greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned” according to FIFA, effectively turns into a head-to-head tiebreaker in the case of ties between two teams.

Tiebreakers do not really factor into Group C head of the matches on Friday, June 19. But depending on those results, they could come into play ahead of the final matches in this group.

#World #Cup #clinching #scenarios #Group">World Cup 2026: What are the clinching scenarios in Group C?

One of the best stories out of the 2026 World Cup so far is without question Scotland.

Specifically, their supporters, and how they have captured the hearts and minds of Bostonians from the North End to the Back Bay, and points in between.

But on the pitch, Scotland opened with a win in the group stage over Haiti, and ahead of matches on Friday, June 19, they have a chance to clinch a spot in the Round of 32.

Here are all the current clinching scenarios for Group C at the 2026 World Cup.

Update Friday evening: With Morocco’s 1-0 win over Scotland, Scotland cannot clinch a spot in the knockout round. In addition, Haiti can now be eliminated with a loss to Brazil later tonight.

Update Friday night: Brazil’s 3-0 win over Haiti moves Brazil into first place, dropping Morocco into second place and Scotland into third place. Haiti has now been eliminated from knockout round contention.

What are the Group C standings?

Here is where things stand after Morocco-Scotland, and ahead of Haiti-Brazil:

Team

W

D

L

GF

GA

GD

Points

Brazil11041+34
Morocco11021+14
Scotland1011103
Haiti00204-40

What are the next Group C matches?

Here is the rest of the Group C schedule, starting with today’s matches.

Morocco 1, Scotland 0
Brazil 3, Haiti 0

Morocco vs. Haiti
Scotland vs. Brazil

What are the current scenarios for Group C?

These are the scenarios for Group C entering play on Friday, June 19.

Scotland is the only team that can clinch a spot in the knockout round today. With a win over Morocco, they are guaranteed a spot in the Round of 32 as one of the top two teams in Group C.

However, they will win the group and book a match between the second-place team in Group F in the Round of 32 with a win over Morocco, coupled with a Brazil loss or tie against Haiti. Scotland and Brazil face each other in the final group match, and with a win over Morocco, Scotland would improve to six points. Should Brazil then lose or tie against Haiti, they could not jump over Scotland in the standings, even with a win in the final match. At most, Brazil would have five points.

On the flip side, Haiti faces elimination on Friday. Should they lose, a corresponding Morocco win over Scotland means Haiti is eliminated.

The good news? Neither team can be eliminated on Friday. But neither can clinch a spot in the knockout round just yet.

Here is how tiebreakers work at the World Cup this year.

If two or more teams in the same group are equal on points following the group stage, a three-step process will be followed to determine tiebreakers.

In the first step, the greatest number of points in the group matches between the tied teams will be applied. Then, the superior goal difference from the group matches between the tied teams will be applied, and finally, the greatest number of goals scored in all group matches between the tied teams will be applied.

If that cannot determine a tiebreaker, then the teams that are still equal will advance to step two. In this stage, the first step is the goal difference in all group matches, then the greatest number of goals in all group matches, and finally the highest team conduct score (relating to yellow and red cards) will be applied.

If that does not break the tie, then the teams still equal on points will be ranked according to the most recent FIFA World Rankings.

That first step, which reads “greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned” according to FIFA, effectively turns into a head-to-head tiebreaker in the case of ties between two teams.

Tiebreakers do not really factor into Group C head of the matches on Friday, June 19. But depending on those results, they could come into play ahead of the final matches in this group.

#World #Cup #clinching #scenarios #Group

Post Comment