×
A weekend with the Nintendo Switch 2

A weekend with the Nintendo Switch 2

Now that I’ve had a Nintendo Switch 2 in my hands for a few days, I can say pretty confidently that this feels a lot like a Switch. You know, only more. The differences between console generations have become increasingly blurry over the last few years, and Nintendo’s latest device is the blurriest yet. It really is just a bigger, more powerful Switch. It’s not a radical update to Nintendo’s portable console — but it is a pleasant one.

There are some elements I still need to test properly for our full review — like the mouse controls and GameChat social features — but after an entire weekend spent playing a lot of Mario Kart World, Cyberpunk 2077, Street Fighter 6, and a bunch of other games, I can also tell that it’ll be pretty hard going back to the original Switch.

Here are some of my initial thoughts.

One of the best trends in modern gaming is how your library is able to move along with you when you upgrade your hardware. This has never been a strong suit for Nintendo, which historically has forced users to start over from scratch with a new device. But the company seems to have gotten it right with the Switch 2. After logging into my Nintendo account and spending 15 minutes transferring the contents of my OLED Switch over to the Switch 2, everything was there. Even my online accounts, like with Fortnite, were already logged in, and the old games worked just as they did before.

It may seem like a basic thing — and it is — but it’s nice that Nintendo made this part of the process much more seamless this time around.

Big games are big in more ways than one

One of the promises of the Switch 2 is that larger games, particularly big open-world titles, can now run much better on the beefed up hardware. I’ve been testing this so far by putting a few hours into Cyberpunk 2077. And while it obviously doesn’t look as good as it does on a high-end PC, PlayStation, or Xbox, it still looks and runs pretty great. I haven’t noticed any major issues with the game either in docked or handheld mode. The game doesn’t look as sharp when playing on a portable, and I spotted the odd blurry texture on in-game billboards, but it ran nice and smooth otherwise.

The flipside is that the Switch 2 now has some pretty hefty file sizes to deal with. Cyberpunk 2077 is nearly 60GB, while Street Fighter 6 is 49.2GB, and Fortnite is 37.8GB. That’s smaller than on a PS5, for example, where blockbuster games are often pushing 100GB, but it does mean I’ve already had to manage my software to make things fit.

Hardware size hasn’t been an issue

The other size differences — the bigger screen and heavier hardware — haven’t been an issue for me so far. I sat out in the sun playing Mario Kart World until the battery was nearly dead, and I didn’t really notice any discomfort, aside from the sore right thumb that is the price of playing Mario Kart with any degree of intensity. My 12-year-old also spent two hours playing the upgraded Pokémon Violet and claimed it was a comfortable experience, but that might’ve just been a ploy for more screentime.

Photo: Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge

The Joy-Cons are very satisfying

Functionally, the new controllers are almost identical. Although I have to admit, I keep hitting the GameChat button when I mean to press Home. So there’s been a little bit of relearning muscle memory there. But the best part is the new magnetic connectors, which are extremely satisfying to snap into the Switch 2 and its controller grip. The big, chunky button on the back feels very good to press, to the point that I’ve found myself fiddling with it while waiting for things to load.

Shareable screenshots, finally

This may be a niche concern, but as someone who takes a lot of screenshots while I play games — so I can share important details about public transportation in the Mushroom Kingdom — it’s great that they’re so much easier to share now. Before, I had to scan two different QR codes to get them on my phone. Now, I just click the upload button, and they appear in the Switch mobile app. It works essentially the same way as on the PS5, which is good news for posters like me.

Updated games really look better

There aren’t a lot of major Switch 2 exclusives at launch, but there are a lot of existing games that have been enhanced for the new hardware. My colleagues have already written about how much better The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Fortnite play on the Switch 2. I agree that both of those are solid upgrades, and I even played through Fortnite’s most recent live event on the Switch 2 without any issues.

But I’ve also been spending a whole lot of time in No Man’s Sky (to nobody’s surprise), and it really is a noticeable difference. While the game technically worked on the original hardware, it was also much slower and uglier than on any other platform. The Switch 2 version isn’t the best-looking, of course, but it still looks and runs great, even in portable mode.

I’ve found myself really getting lost in this virtual universe once again, which is much easier to do when you can just take it with you.

Source link
#weekend #Nintendo #Switch

How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor?

To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.

Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.

How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?

Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.

I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.

Transkriptor Review: Is It the Best Speech-to-Text App?
	
Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls.



Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it. 



How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor?



To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.



Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.



How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?



Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.



I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.







Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.



Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.







Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?



Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.







After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.



What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?



To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at .99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is .99 per month or .33 per month on annual billing (.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 



Team runs  per seat monthly, or  per seat on annual billing (0 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.



Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.



ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out forTranskriptor.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audioOtterFree, then .33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute capsSonix per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording



Who is Transkriptor Best For?



With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.



While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.



For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI

Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.

Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.

Home page of transkriptor

Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?

Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.

Live meeting section

After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.

What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?

To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at $9.99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is $19.99 per month or $8.33 per month on annual billing ($99.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 

Team runs $30 per seat monthly, or $20 per seat on annual billing ($240 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.

Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.

ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out for
Transkriptor$9.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audio
OtterFree, then $8.33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute caps
Sonix$10 per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording

Who is Transkriptor Best For?

With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.

While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.

For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI">Transkriptor Review: Is It the Best Speech-to-Text App?
	
Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls.



Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it. 



How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor?



To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.



Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.



How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?



Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.



I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.







Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.



Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.







Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?



Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.







After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.



What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?



To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at .99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is .99 per month or .33 per month on annual billing (.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 



Team runs  per seat monthly, or  per seat on annual billing (0 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.



Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.



ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out forTranskriptor.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audioOtterFree, then .33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute capsSonix per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording



Who is Transkriptor Best For?



With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.



While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.



For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI

Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.

Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.

How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?

Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.

I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.

Transkriptor Review: Is It the Best Speech-to-Text App?
	
Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls.



Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it. 



How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor?



To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.



Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.



How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?



Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.



I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.







Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.



Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.







Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?



Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.







After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.



What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?



To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at .99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is .99 per month or .33 per month on annual billing (.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 



Team runs  per seat monthly, or  per seat on annual billing (0 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.



Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.



ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out forTranskriptor.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audioOtterFree, then .33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute capsSonix per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording



Who is Transkriptor Best For?



With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.



While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.



For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI

Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.

Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.

Home page of transkriptor

Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?

Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.

Live meeting section

After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.

What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?

To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at $9.99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is $19.99 per month or $8.33 per month on annual billing ($99.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 

Team runs $30 per seat monthly, or $20 per seat on annual billing ($240 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.

Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.

ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out for
Transkriptor$9.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audio
OtterFree, then $8.33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute caps
Sonix$10 per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording

Who is Transkriptor Best For?

With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.

While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.

For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI">Transkriptor Review: Is It the Best Speech-to-Text App?

Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls.

Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it. 

How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor?

To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.

Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.

How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?

Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.

I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.

Transkriptor Review: Is It the Best Speech-to-Text App?
	
Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls.



Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it. 



How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor?



To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.



Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.



How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?



Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.



I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.







Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.



Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.







Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?



Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.







After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.



What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?



To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at .99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is .99 per month or .33 per month on annual billing (.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 



Team runs  per seat monthly, or  per seat on annual billing (0 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.



Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.



ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out forTranskriptor.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audioOtterFree, then .33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute capsSonix per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording



Who is Transkriptor Best For?



With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.



While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.



For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI

Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.

Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.

Home page of transkriptor

Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?

Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.

Live meeting section

After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.

What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?

To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at $9.99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is $19.99 per month or $8.33 per month on annual billing ($99.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 

Team runs $30 per seat monthly, or $20 per seat on annual billing ($240 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.

Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.

ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out for
Transkriptor$9.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audio
OtterFree, then $8.33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute caps
Sonix$10 per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording

Who is Transkriptor Best For?

With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.

While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.

For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI

reported across 17 states since early May, with close to two dozen people needing hospitalization as a result. The true toll of cases is almost certainly higher, though, and no clear food source behind these outbreaks has been identified as of yet.

Loud and explosive

Cyclosporiasis is caused by various species of the microscopic parasite Cyclospora, though it’s predominantly Cyclospora cayatenensis.

It usually takes about a week to feel sick after being infected, and the main symptom of cyclosporiasis, according to the Cleveland Clinic, is “loud, watery (explosive) diarrhea.” Joy. The infection can also cause fatigue, loss of appetite, and vomiting, though some people infected with the parasite are fortunate enough to avoid any symptoms at all. People generally feel better after a week or two without the need for treatment, though symptoms can last up to a month. While the infection is rarely fatal, people with weakened immune systems are more vulnerable to severe illness.

Cyclosporiasis is a nationally notifiable disease in 47 states, meaning doctors and testing labs are obligated to report any confirmed cases to their local or state health departments. According to the CDC, cases of cyclosporiasis in the U.S. tend to increase during the warmer months, and this year is no exception. Between May 1 and June 16, there have been 145 domestically acquired cases in 17 states reported to the CDC; of these, 20 people have been hospitalized, though no deaths have been recorded. There have also been 45 reported cases associated with travel (meaning they were likely infected outside of the U.S.).

As is often true for foodborne illness, however, there are probably a lot more hidden cases out there, since many infected people might not seek medical attention over their symptoms. Diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that routine stool testing for cyclosporiasis isn’t conducted in most labs, meaning doctors have to request specialized tests, and many people might not shed enough of the parasite in their poop to be detectable at first, often requiring multiple days of testing.

According to the CDC data, the biggest outbreak is currently in New York, which has reported somewhere between 31 and 80 cases, but it’s likely not the only state that needs to be worried.

“Local, state, and federal (CDC, FDA) public health authorities are investigating several clusters of cases in more than one state. Investigations to identify potential sources are ongoing,” the CDC reported in its latest update on June 18.

There already seem to be larger clusters of cyclosporiasis than currently documented by the CDC. On Tuesday, for instance, Michigan health officials reported that more than 150 cases have been seen in southeastern Michigan across several counties since June 22. A representative for Monroe County specifically told Gizmodo Wednesday that 90 cases have been documented in the county so far.

What to do

Cyclosporiasis is transmitted through eating food and water that’s been contaminated with infected poop, and outbreaks are often linked to produce. So far, no common sources of infection appear to have identified by the CDC or local heath departments for these latest clusters, but there are still steps you can take to lower your chances of contracting it.

The CDC recommends always washing your hands with soap and water before and after handling or preparing raw fruits and vegetables; washing all fruits and vegetables thoroughly under running water before eating, cutting, or cooking (if the produce is labeled prewashed, then you don’t need to do it again), and refrigerating cut, peeled, or cooked fruits and vegetables as soon as possible (within two hours if possible).

#Great #Parasite #Explosive #Diarrhea #Spreadingfoodborne illnesses,infectious diseases,outbreaks">Oh Great, a Parasite That Causes Explosive Diarrhea Is Spreading Right Now
                If there was one word you wouldn’t want to hear in front of the word “diarrhea,” it’d be “explosive.” Unfortunately, it’s a combination that some Americans are personally experiencing right now, thanks to ongoing outbreaks of a parasitic foodborne disease called cyclosporiasis. According to the Centers for the Disease Control and Prevention, there have been nearly 150 cases of cyclosporiasis reported across 17 states since early May, with close to two dozen people needing hospitalization as a result. The true toll of cases is almost certainly higher, though, and no clear food source behind these outbreaks has been identified as of yet. Loud and explosive Cyclosporiasis is caused by various species of the microscopic parasite Cyclospora, though it’s predominantly Cyclospora cayatenensis.

 It usually takes about a week to feel sick after being infected, and the main symptom of cyclosporiasis, according to the Cleveland Clinic, is “loud, watery (explosive) diarrhea.” Joy. The infection can also cause fatigue, loss of appetite, and vomiting, though some people infected with the parasite are fortunate enough to avoid any symptoms at all. People generally feel better after a week or two without the need for treatment, though symptoms can last up to a month. While the infection is rarely fatal, people with weakened immune systems are more vulnerable to severe illness.

 Cyclosporiasis is a nationally notifiable disease in 47 states, meaning doctors and testing labs are obligated to report any confirmed cases to their local or state health departments. According to the CDC, cases of cyclosporiasis in the U.S. tend to increase during the warmer months, and this year is no exception. Between May 1 and June 16, there have been 145 domestically acquired cases in 17 states reported to the CDC; of these, 20 people have been hospitalized, though no deaths have been recorded. There have also been 45 reported cases associated with travel (meaning they were likely infected outside of the U.S.). As is often true for foodborne illness, however, there are probably a lot more hidden cases out there, since many infected people might not seek medical attention over their symptoms. Diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that routine stool testing for cyclosporiasis isn’t conducted in most labs, meaning doctors have to request specialized tests, and many people might not shed enough of the parasite in their poop to be detectable at first, often requiring multiple days of testing.

 According to the CDC data, the biggest outbreak is currently in New York, which has reported somewhere between 31 and 80 cases, but it’s likely not the only state that needs to be worried. “Local, state, and federal (CDC, FDA) public health authorities are investigating several clusters of cases in more than one state. Investigations to identify potential sources are ongoing,” the CDC reported in its latest update on June 18. There already seem to be larger clusters of cyclosporiasis than currently documented by the CDC. On Tuesday, for instance, Michigan health officials reported that more than 150 cases have been seen in southeastern Michigan across several counties since June 22. A representative for Monroe County specifically told Gizmodo Wednesday that 90 cases have been documented in the county so far.

 What to do Cyclosporiasis is transmitted through eating food and water that’s been contaminated with infected poop, and outbreaks are often linked to produce. So far, no common sources of infection appear to have identified by the CDC or local heath departments for these latest clusters, but there are still steps you can take to lower your chances of contracting it. The CDC recommends always washing your hands with soap and water before and after handling or preparing raw fruits and vegetables; washing all fruits and vegetables thoroughly under running water before eating, cutting, or cooking (if the produce is labeled prewashed, then you don’t need to do it again), and refrigerating cut, peeled, or cooked fruits and vegetables as soon as possible (within two hours if possible).      #Great #Parasite #Explosive #Diarrhea #Spreadingfoodborne illnesses,infectious diseases,outbreaks

reported across 17 states since early May, with close to two dozen people needing hospitalization as a result. The true toll of cases is almost certainly higher, though, and no clear food source behind these outbreaks has been identified as of yet.

Loud and explosive

Cyclosporiasis is caused by various species of the microscopic parasite Cyclospora, though it’s predominantly Cyclospora cayatenensis.

It usually takes about a week to feel sick after being infected, and the main symptom of cyclosporiasis, according to the Cleveland Clinic, is “loud, watery (explosive) diarrhea.” Joy. The infection can also cause fatigue, loss of appetite, and vomiting, though some people infected with the parasite are fortunate enough to avoid any symptoms at all. People generally feel better after a week or two without the need for treatment, though symptoms can last up to a month. While the infection is rarely fatal, people with weakened immune systems are more vulnerable to severe illness.

Cyclosporiasis is a nationally notifiable disease in 47 states, meaning doctors and testing labs are obligated to report any confirmed cases to their local or state health departments. According to the CDC, cases of cyclosporiasis in the U.S. tend to increase during the warmer months, and this year is no exception. Between May 1 and June 16, there have been 145 domestically acquired cases in 17 states reported to the CDC; of these, 20 people have been hospitalized, though no deaths have been recorded. There have also been 45 reported cases associated with travel (meaning they were likely infected outside of the U.S.).

As is often true for foodborne illness, however, there are probably a lot more hidden cases out there, since many infected people might not seek medical attention over their symptoms. Diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that routine stool testing for cyclosporiasis isn’t conducted in most labs, meaning doctors have to request specialized tests, and many people might not shed enough of the parasite in their poop to be detectable at first, often requiring multiple days of testing.

According to the CDC data, the biggest outbreak is currently in New York, which has reported somewhere between 31 and 80 cases, but it’s likely not the only state that needs to be worried.

“Local, state, and federal (CDC, FDA) public health authorities are investigating several clusters of cases in more than one state. Investigations to identify potential sources are ongoing,” the CDC reported in its latest update on June 18.

There already seem to be larger clusters of cyclosporiasis than currently documented by the CDC. On Tuesday, for instance, Michigan health officials reported that more than 150 cases have been seen in southeastern Michigan across several counties since June 22. A representative for Monroe County specifically told Gizmodo Wednesday that 90 cases have been documented in the county so far.

What to do

Cyclosporiasis is transmitted through eating food and water that’s been contaminated with infected poop, and outbreaks are often linked to produce. So far, no common sources of infection appear to have identified by the CDC or local heath departments for these latest clusters, but there are still steps you can take to lower your chances of contracting it.

The CDC recommends always washing your hands with soap and water before and after handling or preparing raw fruits and vegetables; washing all fruits and vegetables thoroughly under running water before eating, cutting, or cooking (if the produce is labeled prewashed, then you don’t need to do it again), and refrigerating cut, peeled, or cooked fruits and vegetables as soon as possible (within two hours if possible).

#Great #Parasite #Explosive #Diarrhea #Spreadingfoodborne illnesses,infectious diseases,outbreaks">Oh Great, a Parasite That Causes Explosive Diarrhea Is Spreading Right NowOh Great, a Parasite That Causes Explosive Diarrhea Is Spreading Right Now
                If there was one word you wouldn’t want to hear in front of the word “diarrhea,” it’d be “explosive.” Unfortunately, it’s a combination that some Americans are personally experiencing right now, thanks to ongoing outbreaks of a parasitic foodborne disease called cyclosporiasis. According to the Centers for the Disease Control and Prevention, there have been nearly 150 cases of cyclosporiasis reported across 17 states since early May, with close to two dozen people needing hospitalization as a result. The true toll of cases is almost certainly higher, though, and no clear food source behind these outbreaks has been identified as of yet. Loud and explosive Cyclosporiasis is caused by various species of the microscopic parasite Cyclospora, though it’s predominantly Cyclospora cayatenensis.

 It usually takes about a week to feel sick after being infected, and the main symptom of cyclosporiasis, according to the Cleveland Clinic, is “loud, watery (explosive) diarrhea.” Joy. The infection can also cause fatigue, loss of appetite, and vomiting, though some people infected with the parasite are fortunate enough to avoid any symptoms at all. People generally feel better after a week or two without the need for treatment, though symptoms can last up to a month. While the infection is rarely fatal, people with weakened immune systems are more vulnerable to severe illness.

 Cyclosporiasis is a nationally notifiable disease in 47 states, meaning doctors and testing labs are obligated to report any confirmed cases to their local or state health departments. According to the CDC, cases of cyclosporiasis in the U.S. tend to increase during the warmer months, and this year is no exception. Between May 1 and June 16, there have been 145 domestically acquired cases in 17 states reported to the CDC; of these, 20 people have been hospitalized, though no deaths have been recorded. There have also been 45 reported cases associated with travel (meaning they were likely infected outside of the U.S.). As is often true for foodborne illness, however, there are probably a lot more hidden cases out there, since many infected people might not seek medical attention over their symptoms. Diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that routine stool testing for cyclosporiasis isn’t conducted in most labs, meaning doctors have to request specialized tests, and many people might not shed enough of the parasite in their poop to be detectable at first, often requiring multiple days of testing.

 According to the CDC data, the biggest outbreak is currently in New York, which has reported somewhere between 31 and 80 cases, but it’s likely not the only state that needs to be worried. “Local, state, and federal (CDC, FDA) public health authorities are investigating several clusters of cases in more than one state. Investigations to identify potential sources are ongoing,” the CDC reported in its latest update on June 18. There already seem to be larger clusters of cyclosporiasis than currently documented by the CDC. On Tuesday, for instance, Michigan health officials reported that more than 150 cases have been seen in southeastern Michigan across several counties since June 22. A representative for Monroe County specifically told Gizmodo Wednesday that 90 cases have been documented in the county so far.

 What to do Cyclosporiasis is transmitted through eating food and water that’s been contaminated with infected poop, and outbreaks are often linked to produce. So far, no common sources of infection appear to have identified by the CDC or local heath departments for these latest clusters, but there are still steps you can take to lower your chances of contracting it. The CDC recommends always washing your hands with soap and water before and after handling or preparing raw fruits and vegetables; washing all fruits and vegetables thoroughly under running water before eating, cutting, or cooking (if the produce is labeled prewashed, then you don’t need to do it again), and refrigerating cut, peeled, or cooked fruits and vegetables as soon as possible (within two hours if possible).      #Great #Parasite #Explosive #Diarrhea #Spreadingfoodborne illnesses,infectious diseases,outbreaks

If there was one word you wouldn’t want to hear in front of the word “diarrhea,” it’d be “explosive.” Unfortunately, it’s a combination that some Americans are personally experiencing right now, thanks to ongoing outbreaks of a parasitic foodborne disease called cyclosporiasis.

According to the Centers for the Disease Control and Prevention, there have been nearly 150 cases of cyclosporiasis reported across 17 states since early May, with close to two dozen people needing hospitalization as a result. The true toll of cases is almost certainly higher, though, and no clear food source behind these outbreaks has been identified as of yet.

Loud and explosive

Cyclosporiasis is caused by various species of the microscopic parasite Cyclospora, though it’s predominantly Cyclospora cayatenensis.

It usually takes about a week to feel sick after being infected, and the main symptom of cyclosporiasis, according to the Cleveland Clinic, is “loud, watery (explosive) diarrhea.” Joy. The infection can also cause fatigue, loss of appetite, and vomiting, though some people infected with the parasite are fortunate enough to avoid any symptoms at all. People generally feel better after a week or two without the need for treatment, though symptoms can last up to a month. While the infection is rarely fatal, people with weakened immune systems are more vulnerable to severe illness.

Cyclosporiasis is a nationally notifiable disease in 47 states, meaning doctors and testing labs are obligated to report any confirmed cases to their local or state health departments. According to the CDC, cases of cyclosporiasis in the U.S. tend to increase during the warmer months, and this year is no exception. Between May 1 and June 16, there have been 145 domestically acquired cases in 17 states reported to the CDC; of these, 20 people have been hospitalized, though no deaths have been recorded. There have also been 45 reported cases associated with travel (meaning they were likely infected outside of the U.S.).

As is often true for foodborne illness, however, there are probably a lot more hidden cases out there, since many infected people might not seek medical attention over their symptoms. Diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that routine stool testing for cyclosporiasis isn’t conducted in most labs, meaning doctors have to request specialized tests, and many people might not shed enough of the parasite in their poop to be detectable at first, often requiring multiple days of testing.

According to the CDC data, the biggest outbreak is currently in New York, which has reported somewhere between 31 and 80 cases, but it’s likely not the only state that needs to be worried.

“Local, state, and federal (CDC, FDA) public health authorities are investigating several clusters of cases in more than one state. Investigations to identify potential sources are ongoing,” the CDC reported in its latest update on June 18.

There already seem to be larger clusters of cyclosporiasis than currently documented by the CDC. On Tuesday, for instance, Michigan health officials reported that more than 150 cases have been seen in southeastern Michigan across several counties since June 22. A representative for Monroe County specifically told Gizmodo Wednesday that 90 cases have been documented in the county so far.

What to do

Cyclosporiasis is transmitted through eating food and water that’s been contaminated with infected poop, and outbreaks are often linked to produce. So far, no common sources of infection appear to have identified by the CDC or local heath departments for these latest clusters, but there are still steps you can take to lower your chances of contracting it.

The CDC recommends always washing your hands with soap and water before and after handling or preparing raw fruits and vegetables; washing all fruits and vegetables thoroughly under running water before eating, cutting, or cooking (if the produce is labeled prewashed, then you don’t need to do it again), and refrigerating cut, peeled, or cooked fruits and vegetables as soon as possible (within two hours if possible).

#Great #Parasite #Explosive #Diarrhea #Spreadingfoodborne illnesses,infectious diseases,outbreaks

Post Comment