×
Deadspin | Field Level Media’s Top 100   Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images   Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:  1. QB Fernando Mendoza	Indiana (6-5, 225)  2. RB Jeremiyah Love 	Notre Dame (6-0, 210)  3. TE Kenyon Sadiq 	Oregon (6-3, 245)  4. WR Carnell Tate 	Ohio State (6-3, 195)  5. OT Spencer Fano 	Utah (6-4, 300)  6. LB Arvell Reese 	              Ohio State (6-4, 243)  7. EDGE David Bailey 	Texas Tech (6-3, 247)  8. LB Sonny Styles 	Ohio State (6-5, 243)  9. EDGE Keldric Faulk 	Auburn (6-5, 285)  10. OT Kadyn Proctor 	Alabama (6-7, 365)  11. S Caleb Downs 	Ohio State (6-1, 200)  12. WR Makai Lemon 	USC (5-11, 195)  13. OT Francis Mauigoa 	Miami (6-6, 300)  14. CB Mansoor Delane 	LSU (6-0, 190)  15. DT Peter Woods 	Clemson (6-3, 315)  16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr.      Miami (6-2, 270)  17. CB Avieon Terrell 	Clemson (5-11, 190)  18. WR Jordyn Tyson 	Arizona State (6-2, 200)  19. DT Kayden McDonald 	Ohio State (6-2, 326)  20. CB Jermod McCoy 	Tennessee (5-10, 193)  21. OLB Cashius Howell 	Texas A&M (6-2, 249)  22. CB Colton Hood 	Tennessee (6-0, 195)  23. CB Brandon Cisse 	South Carolina (6-0, 190)  24. WR KC Concepcion 	Texas A&M (5-11, 190)  25. QB Ty Simpson 	Alabama (6-2, 208)  26. OT Monroe Freeling 	Georgia (6-7, 315)  27. OT Caleb Lomu 	Utah (6-6, 300)  28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)  29. LB Anthony Hill Jr.           Texas (6-2, 238)  30. OG Vega Ioane 	Penn State (6-4, 323)  31. RB Jadarian Price 	Notre Dame (5-10, 210)  32. C Connor Lew 	              Auburn (6-3, 300)  33. LB Jake Golday 	              Cincinnati (6-4, 240)  34. DT Lee Hunter 	              Texas Tech (6-3, 333)  35. DT Caleb Banks 	Florida (6-6, 334)  36. CB Chris Johnson 	San Diego State (6-0, 185)  37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. 	Indiana (6-0, 204)  38. TE Max Klare 	              Ohio State (6-3, 240)  39. LB CJ Allen 	              Georgia (6-1, 236)  40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor    Miami (6-3, 265)  41. CB Will Lee III 	             Texas A&M (6-1, 191)  42. EDGE Joshua Josephs     Tennessee (6-3, 240)  43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence   UCF (6-4, 247)  44. CB Keith Abney II 	Arizona State (6-0, 190)  45. QB Taylen Green 	Arkansas (6-6, 225)  46. OLB R Mason Thomas 	Oklahoma (6-1, 249)  47. EDGE TJ Parker 	Clemson (6-3, 255)  48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon    Oregon (6-4, 323)  49. OT Max Iheanachor 	Arizona State (6-5, 325)  50. WR Germie Bernard 	Alabama (6-1, 209)   51. EDGE Derrick Moore 	Michigan (6-3, 265)  52. WR Chris Bell 	               Louisville (6-2, 220)  53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)  54. WR Bryce Lance 	North Dakota State (6-3, 210)  55. EDGE LT Overton 	Alabama (6-2, 274)  56. OG Chase Bisontis 	Texas A&M (6-6, 320)  57. EDGE Zion Young 	Missouri (6-5, 255)  58. OT Blake Miller 	Clemson (6-6, 314)  59. DT Domonique Orange    Iowa State (6-2, 325)  60. OT Caleb Tiernan 	Northwestern (6-7, 325)  61. TE Eli Stowers 	              Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)  62. SS Jakobe Thomas 	Miami (6-2, 200)  63. SS DQ Smith 	              South Carolina (6-1, 209)  64. RB Jonah Coleman 	Washington (5-9, 225)  65. OT Markel Bell	              Miami (6-9, 340)  66. WR Ted Hurst 	              Georgia State (6-3, 193)  67. CB Keionte Scott 	Miami (6-0, 195)  68. C Logan Jones 	              Iowa (6-3, 302)  69. C Brian Parker II 	Duke (6-5, 300)  70. FS Bud Clark 	              TCU (6-0, 190)  71. LB Harold Perkins Jr.        LSU (6-1, 222)  72. SS Jalon Kilgore 	South Carolina (6-1, 197)  73. CB Charles Demmings      Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)  74. RB Nick Singleton 	Penn State (6-0, 226)  75. QB Carson Beck 	Miami (6-4, 225)  76. CB Treydan Stukes 	Arizona (6-2, 200)  77. CB Hezekiah Masses 	California (6-1, 185)  78. QB Cade Klubnik 	Clemson (6-1, 210)  79. FS Genesis Smith 	Arizona (6-2, 204)  80. FS Dillon Thieneman        Oregon (6-0, 205)  81. WR Zachariah Branch       Georgia (5-10, 175)  82. WR Chris Brazzell II         Tennessee (6-4, 200)  83. SS A.J. Haulcy                 LSU (5-11, 222)  84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)  85. WR Antonio Williams       Clemson (5-11, 190)  86. OG Gennings Dunker       Iowa (6-5, 315)  87. FS Kamari Ramsey 	USC (6-0, 205)  88. RB Kaytron Allen 	Penn State (5-11, 220)  89. SS Zakee Wheatley 	Penn State (6-2, 192)  90. WR Deion Burks 	Oklahoma (5-9, 190)  91. OT Drew Shelton 	Penn State (6-5, 305)  92. CB Daylen Everette 	Georgia (6-0, 193)  93. OG Anez Cooper 	Miami (6-6, 350)  94. DT Tim Keenan III 	Alabama (6-2, 320)  95. EDGE Patrick Payton         LSU (6-6, 255)  96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia 	SMU (6-1, 205)  97. CB Julian Neal 	              Arkansas (6-2, 208)  98. CB Tacario Davis 	Washington (6-4, 200)  99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr.      Florida State (6-5, 337)  100. EDGE Max Llewellyn       Iowa (6-5, 263)  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #Top

Deadspin | Field Level Media’s Top 100
Deadspin | Field Level Media’s Top 100   Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images   Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:  1. QB Fernando Mendoza	Indiana (6-5, 225)  2. RB Jeremiyah Love 	Notre Dame (6-0, 210)  3. TE Kenyon Sadiq 	Oregon (6-3, 245)  4. WR Carnell Tate 	Ohio State (6-3, 195)  5. OT Spencer Fano 	Utah (6-4, 300)  6. LB Arvell Reese 	              Ohio State (6-4, 243)  7. EDGE David Bailey 	Texas Tech (6-3, 247)  8. LB Sonny Styles 	Ohio State (6-5, 243)  9. EDGE Keldric Faulk 	Auburn (6-5, 285)  10. OT Kadyn Proctor 	Alabama (6-7, 365)  11. S Caleb Downs 	Ohio State (6-1, 200)  12. WR Makai Lemon 	USC (5-11, 195)  13. OT Francis Mauigoa 	Miami (6-6, 300)  14. CB Mansoor Delane 	LSU (6-0, 190)  15. DT Peter Woods 	Clemson (6-3, 315)  16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr.      Miami (6-2, 270)  17. CB Avieon Terrell 	Clemson (5-11, 190)  18. WR Jordyn Tyson 	Arizona State (6-2, 200)  19. DT Kayden McDonald 	Ohio State (6-2, 326)  20. CB Jermod McCoy 	Tennessee (5-10, 193)  21. OLB Cashius Howell 	Texas A&M (6-2, 249)  22. CB Colton Hood 	Tennessee (6-0, 195)  23. CB Brandon Cisse 	South Carolina (6-0, 190)  24. WR KC Concepcion 	Texas A&M (5-11, 190)  25. QB Ty Simpson 	Alabama (6-2, 208)  26. OT Monroe Freeling 	Georgia (6-7, 315)  27. OT Caleb Lomu 	Utah (6-6, 300)  28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)  29. LB Anthony Hill Jr.           Texas (6-2, 238)  30. OG Vega Ioane 	Penn State (6-4, 323)  31. RB Jadarian Price 	Notre Dame (5-10, 210)  32. C Connor Lew 	              Auburn (6-3, 300)  33. LB Jake Golday 	              Cincinnati (6-4, 240)  34. DT Lee Hunter 	              Texas Tech (6-3, 333)  35. DT Caleb Banks 	Florida (6-6, 334)  36. CB Chris Johnson 	San Diego State (6-0, 185)  37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. 	Indiana (6-0, 204)  38. TE Max Klare 	              Ohio State (6-3, 240)  39. LB CJ Allen 	              Georgia (6-1, 236)  40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor    Miami (6-3, 265)  41. CB Will Lee III 	             Texas A&M (6-1, 191)  42. EDGE Joshua Josephs     Tennessee (6-3, 240)  43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence   UCF (6-4, 247)  44. CB Keith Abney II 	Arizona State (6-0, 190)  45. QB Taylen Green 	Arkansas (6-6, 225)  46. OLB R Mason Thomas 	Oklahoma (6-1, 249)  47. EDGE TJ Parker 	Clemson (6-3, 255)  48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon    Oregon (6-4, 323)  49. OT Max Iheanachor 	Arizona State (6-5, 325)  50. WR Germie Bernard 	Alabama (6-1, 209)   51. EDGE Derrick Moore 	Michigan (6-3, 265)  52. WR Chris Bell 	               Louisville (6-2, 220)  53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)  54. WR Bryce Lance 	North Dakota State (6-3, 210)  55. EDGE LT Overton 	Alabama (6-2, 274)  56. OG Chase Bisontis 	Texas A&M (6-6, 320)  57. EDGE Zion Young 	Missouri (6-5, 255)  58. OT Blake Miller 	Clemson (6-6, 314)  59. DT Domonique Orange    Iowa State (6-2, 325)  60. OT Caleb Tiernan 	Northwestern (6-7, 325)  61. TE Eli Stowers 	              Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)  62. SS Jakobe Thomas 	Miami (6-2, 200)  63. SS DQ Smith 	              South Carolina (6-1, 209)  64. RB Jonah Coleman 	Washington (5-9, 225)  65. OT Markel Bell	              Miami (6-9, 340)  66. WR Ted Hurst 	              Georgia State (6-3, 193)  67. CB Keionte Scott 	Miami (6-0, 195)  68. C Logan Jones 	              Iowa (6-3, 302)  69. C Brian Parker II 	Duke (6-5, 300)  70. FS Bud Clark 	              TCU (6-0, 190)  71. LB Harold Perkins Jr.        LSU (6-1, 222)  72. SS Jalon Kilgore 	South Carolina (6-1, 197)  73. CB Charles Demmings      Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)  74. RB Nick Singleton 	Penn State (6-0, 226)  75. QB Carson Beck 	Miami (6-4, 225)  76. CB Treydan Stukes 	Arizona (6-2, 200)  77. CB Hezekiah Masses 	California (6-1, 185)  78. QB Cade Klubnik 	Clemson (6-1, 210)  79. FS Genesis Smith 	Arizona (6-2, 204)  80. FS Dillon Thieneman        Oregon (6-0, 205)  81. WR Zachariah Branch       Georgia (5-10, 175)  82. WR Chris Brazzell II         Tennessee (6-4, 200)  83. SS A.J. Haulcy                 LSU (5-11, 222)  84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)  85. WR Antonio Williams       Clemson (5-11, 190)  86. OG Gennings Dunker       Iowa (6-5, 315)  87. FS Kamari Ramsey 	USC (6-0, 205)  88. RB Kaytron Allen 	Penn State (5-11, 220)  89. SS Zakee Wheatley 	Penn State (6-2, 192)  90. WR Deion Burks 	Oklahoma (5-9, 190)  91. OT Drew Shelton 	Penn State (6-5, 305)  92. CB Daylen Everette 	Georgia (6-0, 193)  93. OG Anez Cooper 	Miami (6-6, 350)  94. DT Tim Keenan III 	Alabama (6-2, 320)  95. EDGE Patrick Payton         LSU (6-6, 255)  96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia 	SMU (6-1, 205)  97. CB Julian Neal 	              Arkansas (6-2, 208)  98. CB Tacario Davis 	Washington (6-4, 200)  99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr.      Florida State (6-5, 337)  100. EDGE Max Llewellyn       Iowa (6-5, 263)  –Field Level Media    #Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #TopIndiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:

1. QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana (6-5, 225)

2. RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame (6-0, 210)

3. TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon (6-3, 245)

4. WR Carnell Tate Ohio State (6-3, 195)

5. OT Spencer Fano Utah (6-4, 300)

6. LB Arvell Reese Ohio State (6-4, 243)

7. EDGE David Bailey Texas Tech (6-3, 247)

8. LB Sonny Styles Ohio State (6-5, 243)

9. EDGE Keldric Faulk Auburn (6-5, 285)

10. OT Kadyn Proctor Alabama (6-7, 365)

11. S Caleb Downs Ohio State (6-1, 200)

12. WR Makai Lemon USC (5-11, 195)

13. OT Francis Mauigoa Miami (6-6, 300)

14. CB Mansoor Delane LSU (6-0, 190)

15. DT Peter Woods Clemson (6-3, 315)

16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Miami (6-2, 270)

17. CB Avieon Terrell Clemson (5-11, 190)

18. WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State (6-2, 200)

19. DT Kayden McDonald Ohio State (6-2, 326)

20. CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee (5-10, 193)

21. OLB Cashius Howell Texas A&M (6-2, 249)

22. CB Colton Hood Tennessee (6-0, 195)

23. CB Brandon Cisse South Carolina (6-0, 190)

24. WR KC Concepcion Texas A&M (5-11, 190)

25. QB Ty Simpson Alabama (6-2, 208)

26. OT Monroe Freeling Georgia (6-7, 315)

27. OT Caleb Lomu Utah (6-6, 300)

28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)

29. LB Anthony Hill Jr. Texas (6-2, 238)

30. OG Vega Ioane Penn State (6-4, 323)

31. RB Jadarian Price Notre Dame (5-10, 210)

32. C Connor Lew Auburn (6-3, 300)

33. LB Jake Golday Cincinnati (6-4, 240)

34. DT Lee Hunter Texas Tech (6-3, 333)

35. DT Caleb Banks Florida (6-6, 334)

36. CB Chris Johnson San Diego State (6-0, 185)

37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. Indiana (6-0, 204)

38. TE Max Klare Ohio State (6-3, 240)

39. LB CJ Allen Georgia (6-1, 236)

40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor Miami (6-3, 265)

41. CB Will Lee III Texas A&M (6-1, 191)

42. EDGE Joshua Josephs Tennessee (6-3, 240)

43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence UCF (6-4, 247)

44. CB Keith Abney II Arizona State (6-0, 190)

45. QB Taylen Green Arkansas (6-6, 225)

46. OLB R Mason Thomas Oklahoma (6-1, 249)

47. EDGE TJ Parker Clemson (6-3, 255)

48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon Oregon (6-4, 323)

49. OT Max Iheanachor Arizona State (6-5, 325)


50. WR Germie Bernard Alabama (6-1, 209)

51. EDGE Derrick Moore Michigan (6-3, 265)

52. WR Chris Bell Louisville (6-2, 220)

53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)

54. WR Bryce Lance North Dakota State (6-3, 210)

55. EDGE LT Overton Alabama (6-2, 274)

56. OG Chase Bisontis Texas A&M (6-6, 320)

57. EDGE Zion Young Missouri (6-5, 255)

58. OT Blake Miller Clemson (6-6, 314)

59. DT Domonique Orange Iowa State (6-2, 325)

60. OT Caleb Tiernan Northwestern (6-7, 325)

61. TE Eli Stowers Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)

62. SS Jakobe Thomas Miami (6-2, 200)

63. SS DQ Smith South Carolina (6-1, 209)

64. RB Jonah Coleman Washington (5-9, 225)

65. OT Markel Bell Miami (6-9, 340)

66. WR Ted Hurst Georgia State (6-3, 193)

67. CB Keionte Scott Miami (6-0, 195)

68. C Logan Jones Iowa (6-3, 302)

69. C Brian Parker II Duke (6-5, 300)

70. FS Bud Clark TCU (6-0, 190)

71. LB Harold Perkins Jr. LSU (6-1, 222)

72. SS Jalon Kilgore South Carolina (6-1, 197)

73. CB Charles Demmings Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)

74. RB Nick Singleton Penn State (6-0, 226)

75. QB Carson Beck Miami (6-4, 225)

76. CB Treydan Stukes Arizona (6-2, 200)

77. CB Hezekiah Masses California (6-1, 185)

78. QB Cade Klubnik Clemson (6-1, 210)

79. FS Genesis Smith Arizona (6-2, 204)

80. FS Dillon Thieneman Oregon (6-0, 205)

81. WR Zachariah Branch Georgia (5-10, 175)

82. WR Chris Brazzell II Tennessee (6-4, 200)

83. SS A.J. Haulcy LSU (5-11, 222)

84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)

85. WR Antonio Williams Clemson (5-11, 190)

86. OG Gennings Dunker Iowa (6-5, 315)

87. FS Kamari Ramsey USC (6-0, 205)

88. RB Kaytron Allen Penn State (5-11, 220)

89. SS Zakee Wheatley Penn State (6-2, 192)

90. WR Deion Burks Oklahoma (5-9, 190)

91. OT Drew Shelton Penn State (6-5, 305)

92. CB Daylen Everette Georgia (6-0, 193)

93. OG Anez Cooper Miami (6-6, 350)

94. DT Tim Keenan III Alabama (6-2, 320)

95. EDGE Patrick Payton LSU (6-6, 255)

96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia SMU (6-1, 205)

97. CB Julian Neal Arkansas (6-2, 208)

98. CB Tacario Davis Washington (6-4, 200)

99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr. Florida State (6-5, 337)

100. EDGE Max Llewellyn Iowa (6-5, 263)


–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #Top

Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:

1. QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana (6-5, 225)

2. RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame (6-0, 210)

3. TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon (6-3, 245)

4. WR Carnell Tate Ohio State (6-3, 195)

5. OT Spencer Fano Utah (6-4, 300)

6. LB Arvell Reese Ohio State (6-4, 243)

7. EDGE David Bailey Texas Tech (6-3, 247)

8. LB Sonny Styles Ohio State (6-5, 243)

9. EDGE Keldric Faulk Auburn (6-5, 285)

10. OT Kadyn Proctor Alabama (6-7, 365)

11. S Caleb Downs Ohio State (6-1, 200)

12. WR Makai Lemon USC (5-11, 195)

13. OT Francis Mauigoa Miami (6-6, 300)

14. CB Mansoor Delane LSU (6-0, 190)

15. DT Peter Woods Clemson (6-3, 315)

16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Miami (6-2, 270)

17. CB Avieon Terrell Clemson (5-11, 190)

18. WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State (6-2, 200)

19. DT Kayden McDonald Ohio State (6-2, 326)

20. CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee (5-10, 193)

21. OLB Cashius Howell Texas A&M (6-2, 249)

22. CB Colton Hood Tennessee (6-0, 195)

23. CB Brandon Cisse South Carolina (6-0, 190)

24. WR KC Concepcion Texas A&M (5-11, 190)

25. QB Ty Simpson Alabama (6-2, 208)

26. OT Monroe Freeling Georgia (6-7, 315)

27. OT Caleb Lomu Utah (6-6, 300)

28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)

29. LB Anthony Hill Jr. Texas (6-2, 238)

30. OG Vega Ioane Penn State (6-4, 323)

31. RB Jadarian Price Notre Dame (5-10, 210)

32. C Connor Lew Auburn (6-3, 300)

33. LB Jake Golday Cincinnati (6-4, 240)

34. DT Lee Hunter Texas Tech (6-3, 333)

35. DT Caleb Banks Florida (6-6, 334)

36. CB Chris Johnson San Diego State (6-0, 185)

37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. Indiana (6-0, 204)

38. TE Max Klare Ohio State (6-3, 240)

39. LB CJ Allen Georgia (6-1, 236)

40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor Miami (6-3, 265)

41. CB Will Lee III Texas A&M (6-1, 191)

42. EDGE Joshua Josephs Tennessee (6-3, 240)

43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence UCF (6-4, 247)

44. CB Keith Abney II Arizona State (6-0, 190)

45. QB Taylen Green Arkansas (6-6, 225)

46. OLB R Mason Thomas Oklahoma (6-1, 249)

47. EDGE TJ Parker Clemson (6-3, 255)

48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon Oregon (6-4, 323)

49. OT Max Iheanachor Arizona State (6-5, 325)

50. WR Germie Bernard Alabama (6-1, 209)

51. EDGE Derrick Moore Michigan (6-3, 265)

52. WR Chris Bell Louisville (6-2, 220)

53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)

54. WR Bryce Lance North Dakota State (6-3, 210)

55. EDGE LT Overton Alabama (6-2, 274)

56. OG Chase Bisontis Texas A&M (6-6, 320)

57. EDGE Zion Young Missouri (6-5, 255)

58. OT Blake Miller Clemson (6-6, 314)

59. DT Domonique Orange Iowa State (6-2, 325)

60. OT Caleb Tiernan Northwestern (6-7, 325)

61. TE Eli Stowers Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)

62. SS Jakobe Thomas Miami (6-2, 200)

63. SS DQ Smith South Carolina (6-1, 209)

64. RB Jonah Coleman Washington (5-9, 225)

65. OT Markel Bell Miami (6-9, 340)

66. WR Ted Hurst Georgia State (6-3, 193)

67. CB Keionte Scott Miami (6-0, 195)

68. C Logan Jones Iowa (6-3, 302)

69. C Brian Parker II Duke (6-5, 300)

70. FS Bud Clark TCU (6-0, 190)

71. LB Harold Perkins Jr. LSU (6-1, 222)

72. SS Jalon Kilgore South Carolina (6-1, 197)

73. CB Charles Demmings Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)

74. RB Nick Singleton Penn State (6-0, 226)

75. QB Carson Beck Miami (6-4, 225)

76. CB Treydan Stukes Arizona (6-2, 200)

77. CB Hezekiah Masses California (6-1, 185)

78. QB Cade Klubnik Clemson (6-1, 210)

79. FS Genesis Smith Arizona (6-2, 204)

80. FS Dillon Thieneman Oregon (6-0, 205)

81. WR Zachariah Branch Georgia (5-10, 175)

82. WR Chris Brazzell II Tennessee (6-4, 200)

83. SS A.J. Haulcy LSU (5-11, 222)

84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)

85. WR Antonio Williams Clemson (5-11, 190)

86. OG Gennings Dunker Iowa (6-5, 315)

87. FS Kamari Ramsey USC (6-0, 205)

88. RB Kaytron Allen Penn State (5-11, 220)

89. SS Zakee Wheatley Penn State (6-2, 192)

90. WR Deion Burks Oklahoma (5-9, 190)

91. OT Drew Shelton Penn State (6-5, 305)

92. CB Daylen Everette Georgia (6-0, 193)

93. OG Anez Cooper Miami (6-6, 350)

94. DT Tim Keenan III Alabama (6-2, 320)

95. EDGE Patrick Payton LSU (6-6, 255)

96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia SMU (6-1, 205)

97. CB Julian Neal Arkansas (6-2, 208)

98. CB Tacario Davis Washington (6-4, 200)

99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr. Florida State (6-5, 337)

100. EDGE Max Llewellyn Iowa (6-5, 263)

–Field Level Media

Source link
#Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #Top

Previous post

Deadspin | Peyton Stearns earns chance to face 3-time Madrid champ <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/26743985.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/26743985.jpg" alt="Tennis: National Bank Open" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Jul 30, 2025; Montreal, QC, Canada; Peyton Stearns (USA) returns the ball to Emma Raducanu (GBR) in second round play at IGA Stadium. Mandatory Credit: David Kirouac-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>Peyton Stearns defeated France’s Lois Boisson 6-1, 6-3 in 65 minutes as first-round action got underway Tuesday at the Mutua Madrid Open.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>Stearns’ reward is a matchup with defending champ and No. 1 seed Aryna Sabalenka of Belarus, a three-time winner of the WTA 1000 clay-court tournament in the Spanish capital.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>Stearns never trailed in her opener, saving both break points she faced and converting four of her six break chances against Boisson.</p> </section><section id="section-4"> <p>Fellow American Venus Williams was not as fortunate against 20-year-old Spaniard Kaitlin Quevedo, who prevailed 6-2, 6-4 in one hour and 43 minutes. It was the 10th straight singles loss for Williams, 45, an invited player who was competing on clay for the first time since Roland Garros in 2021.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-5"> <p>Williams, whose sister Serena won this event in 2012 and 2013, won her first WTA title in 1998 — eight years before her opponent was born.</p> </section> <section id="section-6"> <p>Of the 10 singles matches played Tuesday, only one went to three sets. Austria’s Julia Grabher outlasted Spain’s Paula Badosa 7-6 (3), 4-6, 6-0 in two hours and 32 minutes.</p> </section><section id="section-7"> <p>Camila Osorio of Columbia needed only 65 minutes to complete a 6-0, 6-3 win against Russia’s Anastasia Zakharova. Poland’s Magda Linette defeated Robin Montgomery 6-4, 6-3. Hungary’s Anna Bonder posted a 6-2, 6-3 win against Switzerland’s Viktorija Golubic. </p> </section><section id="section-8"> <p>Spain’s Jessica Bouzas Maneiro was a swift 6-1, 6-1 winner against Brazil’s Beatriz Haddad Maia. Laura Siegemund of Germany eliminated Romania’s Irina-Camelia Begu 6-4, 6-0. Petra Marcinko of Croatia earned a 6-0, 7-5 victory over Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva of Andorra, and Czech Laura Samson won 6-4, 6-2 against Germany’s Tatjana Maria.</p> </section><section id="section-9"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section></div> #Deadspin #Peyton #Stearns #earns #chance #face #3time #Madrid #champ

Next post

Knicks and Nuggets Blow Big Leads: What Went Wrong in Game 2? | Deadspin.com <div id="section-1"> <p>Roughly 5,000 feet of elevation separate Denver and New York City.</p><p>Still, gravity works the same regardless of where one stands. Just ask the NBA teams in both towns.</p><p>“You get too high, and you get, I don’t want to say cocky, but feeling yourself,” Nuggets guard Tim Hardaway Jr. said.</p><p>That sensation went south on either side of the country Monday night.</p><p>After squandering sizable leads that would have cemented commanding 2-0 advantages in their respective first-round playoff series, the Nuggets and Knicks now find themselves bracing for a fight.</p><p>Should their opponents ultimately have their number, Denver and New York will look back with disdain on 19 and 14. Those were the Game 2 cushions the teams coughed up as the No. 3 seeds in the Eastern and Western Conference.</p><p>“It’s a game we should’ve won,” <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/04/20/sports/knicks-collapse-in-stunning-game-2-loss-to-let-hawks-even-series/" target="_blank">Knicks guard Josh Hart said</a>. “In the playoffs, we can’t give away games.”</p><p>Be that as it may, the Knicks did just that <a href="https://deadspin.com/which-nba-playoffs-game-1-loser-is-most-likely-to-win-their-series" target="_blank">against the Atlanta Hawks</a>. They controlled the outcome for much of the night and took a 12-point edge into the fourth quarter after leading by as many as 14.</p><p>Then New York shot 5-for-22 from the floor in the final 12 minutes compared to 10-for-15 for Atlanta. Fighting through vulgar chants from the Madison Square Garden faithful, Hawks star CJ McCullom scored six straight points down the stretch during one key sequence on the way to a game-high 32.</p><p>“In that fourth quarter, you could tell [the Hawks] were playing with a level of desperation,” Knicks coach Mike Brown said. “There were four 50-50 balls, and they got three of the four. We always use that stat to gauge the level of aggression in a game. In that fourth quarter, their aggression stepped up.”</p><p>New York’s melted at the same time. How many late possessions saw the Knicks pass or hold the ball around the perimeter before settling for subpar looks from 3-point range? The Knicks went 3-for-11 from deep as part of their flop.</p><p>Denver led the Minnesota Timberwolves by 19 points early in the second quarter before crumbling. The Nuggets still were ahead by three points to start the fourth quarter but a combined 2-for-12 shooting effort from pillars Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray in the final 12 minutes took a toll.</p><p>“I feel like we had the game in hand, and then we just didn’t make our shots,” Murray said.</p><p>As with the Knicks and Hawks, the reversal of fortunes stemmed both from the hosts’ miscues and an outstanding effort from a visiting player, as Minnesota’s Anthony Edwards had 30 points.</p><p>“Great leadership, positive,” Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said. “He recognized he needed to get into attack mode and get downhill a little bit more. He did that.”</p><p>The Knicks and Nuggets no doubt sensed the need to amp up their own urgency as things started slipping away Monday.</p><p>That neither could act upon it didn’t signal the end for either New York or Denver, of course. But now there’s unnecessary added weight for the climb back to the top.</p> </div> #Knicks #Nuggets #Blow #Big #Leads #Wrong #Game #Deadspin.com

Deadspin | NC State-UVA opener moved from Brazil to Charlottesville  Sep 22, 2023; Charlottesville, Virginia, USA; Virginia Cavaliers quarterback Anthony Colandrea (10) scrambles from North Carolina State Wolfpack defensive lineman Noah Potter (97) during the fourth quarter at Scott Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-Imagn Images   The season-opening football game between North Carolina State and Virginia will no longer be played in Brazil.  Both ACC schools announced Wednesday that the contest will be held on Aug. 29 in Charlottesville, Va.  Billed as the first college football game played in South America, it originally was scheduled to take place at Nilton Santos Stadium in Rio de Janeiro.  The decision to relocate came after an “extensive review with the operational partners and international stakeholders” involved in the game, according to a press release.   “This change follows communication from Athlete Advantage, which informed the ACC and participating schools that the event could not be conducted,” the release said.  Fans who purchased tickets or travel packages will receive refunds.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #StateUVA #opener #moved #Brazil #CharlottesvilleSep 22, 2023; Charlottesville, Virginia, USA; Virginia Cavaliers quarterback Anthony Colandrea (10) scrambles from North Carolina State Wolfpack defensive lineman Noah Potter (97) during the fourth quarter at Scott Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-Imagn Images

The season-opening football game between North Carolina State and Virginia will no longer be played in Brazil.

Both ACC schools announced Wednesday that the contest will be held on Aug. 29 in Charlottesville, Va.

Billed as the first college football game played in South America, it originally was scheduled to take place at Nilton Santos Stadium in Rio de Janeiro.


The decision to relocate came after an “extensive review with the operational partners and international stakeholders” involved in the game, according to a press release.

“This change follows communication from Athlete Advantage, which informed the ACC and participating schools that the event could not be conducted,” the release said.

Fans who purchased tickets or travel packages will receive refunds.

–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #StateUVA #opener #moved #Brazil #Charlottesville">Deadspin | NC State-UVA opener moved from Brazil to Charlottesville  Sep 22, 2023; Charlottesville, Virginia, USA; Virginia Cavaliers quarterback Anthony Colandrea (10) scrambles from North Carolina State Wolfpack defensive lineman Noah Potter (97) during the fourth quarter at Scott Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-Imagn Images   The season-opening football game between North Carolina State and Virginia will no longer be played in Brazil.  Both ACC schools announced Wednesday that the contest will be held on Aug. 29 in Charlottesville, Va.  Billed as the first college football game played in South America, it originally was scheduled to take place at Nilton Santos Stadium in Rio de Janeiro.  The decision to relocate came after an “extensive review with the operational partners and international stakeholders” involved in the game, according to a press release.   “This change follows communication from Athlete Advantage, which informed the ACC and participating schools that the event could not be conducted,” the release said.  Fans who purchased tickets or travel packages will receive refunds.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #StateUVA #opener #moved #Brazil #Charlottesville

For as unpredictable as the NBA can be, it doesn’t get many sea changes. That is, big, overhauling alterations to its topography or behavioral patterns – those things take more time. The 2025-2026 Playoffs have been mercurial, surprising, even enlightening, but it’s still not the basketball that’s brought about the most marked development.

It was clear something was different when the tenor of the NBA aggregator infographics changed. Early in the playoffs the images looked familiar, the usual contextless photos of athletes looking gassed or frustrated churned out with blunt, all-caps missives (OUT, ELIMINATED, CHOKED, BUILT DIFFERENT) from NBA media properties’ social platforms and aggregator sites alike. But then, following the first round, there was a blip.

After the Spurs beat the Blazers in a five-game series, Victor Wembanyama answered a postgame question from L’Equipe’s Maxime Aubin about the cliché that showing emotions signals weakness. As that game ended, Wembanyama visibly choked up on the Spurs bench.

“I think it’s first and foremost a fear of judgment,” Wembanyama told Aubin. “Like, this feeling that you have to act a certain way, social codes, I guess. Personally, I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions.”

In rapid succession, the quote was aggregated, but it wasn’t blunted. At most, the “personally” was lopped off, but infographics of all shapes and sizes (or just two, whatever the optimised dimensions are for Instagram and Twitter) stated, like an awkwardly short affirmation, “I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions.” There were photos of Wembanyama looking thoughtfully into the middle distance, photos of him screaming in triumph, lots of photos of him crying, face scrunched or buried into the shoulder of a teammate.

That was early May, when the stakes for the Spurs felt light and low. The team has since advanced through two more rounds, besting the Timberwolves in six and dumbfounding the Thunder in seven games of high-flying, arduous, gorgeous basketball. Throughout those 13 contests, Wembanyama’s emotional peaks and valleys have continued to be on prominent display: there have been more tears, more tension, more frustrations and more joy. In the month backdropping those games, the appreciation, even obsession, with Wembanyama’s expressiveness has also grown. Creators outside the traditional NBA media and fan ecosystem have latched on, touting Wembanyama for normalising vulnerability and bringing back demonstratively caring about things. Even within the typically contradictory and oftentimes dour NBA media space of which I am a part, he’s been similarly lauded.

But Wembanyama isn’t the first athlete to articulate how badly he wants to win and to ugly cry when he does. Nor is he the first to grapple with the juxtaposition of that desirousness against the appearance of cold control we still require of our stars. So, what is it about this moment that’s made Wembanyama resonate so deeply, well beyond the NBA? Why do we care so much about Wembanyama caring so much?

Loathe as we are to admit it, we’re creatures of the contemporary world; frogs boiling in whatever noxious soup du jour each new news cycle dumps more ingredients into. Against the backdrop of accumulating global conflicts and the warped language used by our leaders to justify them — “deescalate” into violent escalation, “winding down” that only serves to ramp up — the plain-spoken rejection of a convoluted and long-held status quo hits like a gulp of cold water. Wembanyama handed us the proverbial glass when he rejected the need to be responsible for other people’s discomfort with his emotions, and he’s topped the glass up each time he’s doubled down on being expressive.

There’s a two-fold distinction in Wembanyama’s direct and considered articulation. The first is that he has the perspective of an outsider, because he is one. Basketball is the common ground, a shared language as much as shorthand between him and a majority American NBA fanbase, but his clarity comes from a lifetime prior to now of looking in. The requisite distance needed to hold a place up like a prism and have it catch different streams of light. It was apparent this past winter, when he was one of just a few NBA players to speak up about ICE violently clamping down on people in Minneapolis.

“Every day I wake up and see the news and I’m horrified. It’s crazy that some people might make it sound like it’s acceptable, the murder of civilians. Every day I read the news and I’m asking very deep questions about my own life. But I’m conscious also that saying everything that’s on my mind that would have a cost that’s too great for me right now,” he told media. “I’m a foreigner, I live in this country, I am concerned.”

Asked to clarify if his hesitation to speak came from being a foreigner, Wembanyama said yes.

It was a glimpse into his thought process as a person navigating the delicate intersection he stood at as a French national and non U.S. citizen, as a high-profile athlete, arguably no longer an abstract “future face of the NBA” but the very one actively eclipsing the last generation, and as, foremost, a person who saw injustice and harm and was compelled to speak up. All athletes exist in something of a suspended state of personhood, expected to perform as their outward persona even when they’re off the court. International athletes — especially those in the U.S. in its current sociopolitical climate — exist in a much more temporal state of belonging and tend to keep below the radar.

His articulation has also been bodily. At his stature, his face is a little like a lighthouse. Whatever expression flashes there is impossible to miss. The difference between Wembanyama’s competitive expressiveness and, say, an athlete blowing up on court with vitriol, is that we’re almost more accustomed to the latter. To expressions of frustration and aggression: fights breaking out, equipment being smashed. We’re conditioned to think of these eruptions as part and parcel with the high-stakes and effort of pro sports, proof of concept. But it’s a little bit of crying that, traditionally, had the potential to send the whole system spiraling. At least it was, until a highly visible — 7’4, towering tears — athlete started doing it.

It’s this visibility of emotion, specifically the emotions we equate with sensitivity and vulnerability, that’s so unique when paired with Wembanyama’s expression of them. It reads as oversimplified, even rude (giant man has giant feelings), but when seemingly softer emotions are expressed at billboard-size scale, it’s almost like exposure therapy.

And it’s high-stakes exposure. Prime-time and now, entering the Finals, under the brightest lights and biggest production the NBA has to offer. There’s been a sense that, as the playoffs wore on and the Spurs gained experience, they’d mature, harden. Wembanyama as their leader perhaps most of all. There is, in some corners of fandom and analysis, even a thirst for this. For a young team like San Antonio to get the hope and all these softer expressions — aspiration, jitters, overwhelming joy — roughly knocked out of them.

But this is it. In a world where we’re told not to care, a mindset reinforced daily by the blithe destruction and ravaging of people, their humanity, far and close to home; where a social veer to aggressive, self-serving apathy is threatening to become — if not already — the norm, a demonstrative example of a person extolling the opposite is jarring. That initial jolt can be taken as a threat, or as an opportunity to recalibrate. To be a little more willing to put your own vulnerabilities on display in return.

My interpretation of Wembanyama being put up as face, or saviour, of the league is not that the NBA was lacking the hyper-unique, once-in-an-era skillset he has prior to this; it’s that he offers an alternative to the majority viewing experience of the world writ large right now. You can certainly watch to be entertained, but you can also watch to be infused with a wallop of emotion. The scale of those feelings is difficult to simply switch off with the game, chances are that they will flash over you in the days, months, and more to come. Against disorienting, intolerant darkness, Wembanyama is a roving light to borrow from or burn with.

#care #Victor #Wembanyama #cares">Why do we care so much that Victor Wembanyama cares so much?  For as unpredictable as the NBA can be, it doesn’t get many sea changes. That is, big, overhauling alterations to its topography or behavioral patterns – those things take more time. The 2025-2026 Playoffs have been mercurial, surprising, even enlightening, but it’s still not the basketball that’s brought about the most marked development.It was clear something was different when the tenor of the NBA aggregator infographics changed. Early in the playoffs the images looked familiar, the usual contextless photos of athletes looking gassed or frustrated churned out with blunt, all-caps missives (OUT, ELIMINATED, CHOKED, BUILT DIFFERENT) from NBA media properties’ social platforms and aggregator sites alike. But then, following the first round, there was a blip.After the Spurs beat the Blazers in a five-game series, Victor Wembanyama answered a postgame question from L’Equipe’s Maxime Aubin about the cliché that showing emotions signals weakness. As that game ended, Wembanyama visibly choked up on the Spurs bench.“I think it’s first and foremost a fear of judgment,” Wembanyama told Aubin. “Like, this feeling that you have to act a certain way, social codes, I guess. Personally, I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions.”In rapid succession, the quote was aggregated, but it wasn’t blunted. At most, the “personally” was lopped off, but infographics of all shapes and sizes (or just two, whatever the optimised dimensions are for Instagram and Twitter) stated, like an awkwardly short affirmation, “I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions.” There were photos of Wembanyama looking thoughtfully into the middle distance, photos of him screaming in triumph, lots of photos of him crying, face scrunched or buried into the shoulder of a teammate.That was early May, when the stakes for the Spurs felt light and low. The team has since advanced through two more rounds, besting the Timberwolves in six and dumbfounding the Thunder in seven games of high-flying, arduous, gorgeous basketball. Throughout those 13 contests, Wembanyama’s emotional peaks and valleys have continued to be on prominent display: there have been more tears, more tension, more frustrations and more joy. In the month backdropping those games, the appreciation, even obsession, with Wembanyama’s expressiveness has also grown. Creators outside the traditional NBA media and fan ecosystem have latched on, touting Wembanyama for normalising vulnerability and bringing back demonstratively caring about things. Even within the typically contradictory and oftentimes dour NBA media space of which I am a part, he’s been similarly lauded.But Wembanyama isn’t the first athlete to articulate how badly he wants to win and to ugly cry when he does. Nor is he the first to grapple with the juxtaposition of that desirousness against the appearance of cold control we still require of our stars. So, what is it about this moment that’s made Wembanyama resonate so deeply, well beyond the NBA? Why do we care so much about Wembanyama caring so much?Loathe as we are to admit it, we’re creatures of the contemporary world; frogs boiling in whatever noxious soup du jour each new news cycle dumps more ingredients into. Against the backdrop of accumulating global conflicts and the warped language used by our leaders to justify them — “deescalate” into violent escalation, “winding down” that only serves to ramp up — the plain-spoken rejection of a convoluted and long-held status quo hits like a gulp of cold water. Wembanyama handed us the proverbial glass when he rejected the need to be responsible for other people’s discomfort with his emotions, and he’s topped the glass up each time he’s doubled down on being expressive.There’s a two-fold distinction in Wembanyama’s direct and considered articulation. The first is that he has the perspective of an outsider, because he is one. Basketball is the common ground, a shared language as much as shorthand between him and a majority American NBA fanbase, but his clarity comes from a lifetime prior to now of looking in. The requisite distance needed to hold a place up like a prism and have it catch different streams of light. It was apparent this past winter, when he was one of just a few NBA players to speak up about ICE violently clamping down on people in Minneapolis.“Every day I wake up and see the news and I’m horrified. It’s crazy that some people might make it sound like it’s acceptable, the murder of civilians. Every day I read the news and I’m asking very deep questions about my own life. But I’m conscious also that saying everything that’s on my mind that would have a cost that’s too great for me right now,” he told media. “I’m a foreigner, I live in this country, I am concerned.”Asked to clarify if his hesitation to speak came from being a foreigner, Wembanyama said yes.It was a glimpse into his thought process as a person navigating the delicate intersection he stood at as a French national and non U.S. citizen, as a high-profile athlete, arguably no longer an abstract “future face of the NBA” but the very one actively eclipsing the last generation, and as, foremost, a person who saw injustice and harm and was compelled to speak up. All athletes exist in something of a suspended state of personhood, expected to perform as their outward persona even when they’re off the court. International athletes — especially those in the U.S. in its current sociopolitical climate — exist in a much more temporal state of belonging and tend to keep below the radar.His articulation has also been bodily. At his stature, his face is a little like a lighthouse. Whatever expression flashes there is impossible to miss. The difference between Wembanyama’s competitive expressiveness and, say, an athlete blowing up on court with vitriol, is that we’re almost more accustomed to the latter. To expressions of frustration and aggression: fights breaking out, equipment being smashed. We’re conditioned to think of these eruptions as part and parcel with the high-stakes and effort of pro sports, proof of concept. But it’s a little bit of crying that, traditionally, had the potential to send the whole system spiraling. At least it was, until a highly visible — 7’4, towering tears — athlete started doing it.It’s this visibility of emotion, specifically the emotions we equate with sensitivity and vulnerability, that’s so unique when paired with Wembanyama’s expression of them. It reads as oversimplified, even rude (giant man has giant feelings), but when seemingly softer emotions are expressed at billboard-size scale, it’s almost like exposure therapy.And it’s high-stakes exposure. Prime-time and now, entering the Finals, under the brightest lights and biggest production the NBA has to offer. There’s been a sense that, as the playoffs wore on and the Spurs gained experience, they’d mature, harden. Wembanyama as their leader perhaps most of all. There is, in some corners of fandom and analysis, even a thirst for this. For a young team like San Antonio to get the hope and all these softer expressions — aspiration, jitters, overwhelming joy — roughly knocked out of them.But this is it. In a world where we’re told not to care, a mindset reinforced daily by the blithe destruction and ravaging of people, their humanity, far and close to home; where a social veer to aggressive, self-serving apathy is threatening to become — if not already — the norm, a demonstrative example of a person extolling the opposite is jarring. That initial jolt can be taken as a threat, or as an opportunity to recalibrate. To be a little more willing to put your own vulnerabilities on display in return.My interpretation of Wembanyama being put up as face, or saviour, of the league is not that the NBA was lacking the hyper-unique, once-in-an-era skillset he has prior to this; it’s that he offers an alternative to the majority viewing experience of the world writ large right now. You can certainly watch to be entertained, but you can also watch to be infused with a wallop of emotion. The scale of those feelings is difficult to simply switch off with the game, chances are that they will flash over you in the days, months, and more to come. Against disorienting, intolerant darkness, Wembanyama is a roving light to borrow from or burn with.  #care #Victor #Wembanyama #cares

postgame question from L’Equipe’s Maxime Aubin about the cliché that showing emotions signals weakness. As that game ended, Wembanyama visibly choked up on the Spurs bench.

“I think it’s first and foremost a fear of judgment,” Wembanyama told Aubin. “Like, this feeling that you have to act a certain way, social codes, I guess. Personally, I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions.”

In rapid succession, the quote was aggregated, but it wasn’t blunted. At most, the “personally” was lopped off, but infographics of all shapes and sizes (or just two, whatever the optimised dimensions are for Instagram and Twitter) stated, like an awkwardly short affirmation, “I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions.” There were photos of Wembanyama looking thoughtfully into the middle distance, photos of him screaming in triumph, lots of photos of him crying, face scrunched or buried into the shoulder of a teammate.

That was early May, when the stakes for the Spurs felt light and low. The team has since advanced through two more rounds, besting the Timberwolves in six and dumbfounding the Thunder in seven games of high-flying, arduous, gorgeous basketball. Throughout those 13 contests, Wembanyama’s emotional peaks and valleys have continued to be on prominent display: there have been more tears, more tension, more frustrations and more joy. In the month backdropping those games, the appreciation, even obsession, with Wembanyama’s expressiveness has also grown. Creators outside the traditional NBA media and fan ecosystem have latched on, touting Wembanyama for normalising vulnerability and bringing back demonstratively caring about things. Even within the typically contradictory and oftentimes dour NBA media space of which I am a part, he’s been similarly lauded.

But Wembanyama isn’t the first athlete to articulate how badly he wants to win and to ugly cry when he does. Nor is he the first to grapple with the juxtaposition of that desirousness against the appearance of cold control we still require of our stars. So, what is it about this moment that’s made Wembanyama resonate so deeply, well beyond the NBA? Why do we care so much about Wembanyama caring so much?

Loathe as we are to admit it, we’re creatures of the contemporary world; frogs boiling in whatever noxious soup du jour each new news cycle dumps more ingredients into. Against the backdrop of accumulating global conflicts and the warped language used by our leaders to justify them — “deescalate” into violent escalation, “winding down” that only serves to ramp up — the plain-spoken rejection of a convoluted and long-held status quo hits like a gulp of cold water. Wembanyama handed us the proverbial glass when he rejected the need to be responsible for other people’s discomfort with his emotions, and he’s topped the glass up each time he’s doubled down on being expressive.

There’s a two-fold distinction in Wembanyama’s direct and considered articulation. The first is that he has the perspective of an outsider, because he is one. Basketball is the common ground, a shared language as much as shorthand between him and a majority American NBA fanbase, but his clarity comes from a lifetime prior to now of looking in. The requisite distance needed to hold a place up like a prism and have it catch different streams of light. It was apparent this past winter, when he was one of just a few NBA players to speak up about ICE violently clamping down on people in Minneapolis.

“Every day I wake up and see the news and I’m horrified. It’s crazy that some people might make it sound like it’s acceptable, the murder of civilians. Every day I read the news and I’m asking very deep questions about my own life. But I’m conscious also that saying everything that’s on my mind that would have a cost that’s too great for me right now,” he told media. “I’m a foreigner, I live in this country, I am concerned.”

Asked to clarify if his hesitation to speak came from being a foreigner, Wembanyama said yes.

It was a glimpse into his thought process as a person navigating the delicate intersection he stood at as a French national and non U.S. citizen, as a high-profile athlete, arguably no longer an abstract “future face of the NBA” but the very one actively eclipsing the last generation, and as, foremost, a person who saw injustice and harm and was compelled to speak up. All athletes exist in something of a suspended state of personhood, expected to perform as their outward persona even when they’re off the court. International athletes — especially those in the U.S. in its current sociopolitical climate — exist in a much more temporal state of belonging and tend to keep below the radar.

His articulation has also been bodily. At his stature, his face is a little like a lighthouse. Whatever expression flashes there is impossible to miss. The difference between Wembanyama’s competitive expressiveness and, say, an athlete blowing up on court with vitriol, is that we’re almost more accustomed to the latter. To expressions of frustration and aggression: fights breaking out, equipment being smashed. We’re conditioned to think of these eruptions as part and parcel with the high-stakes and effort of pro sports, proof of concept. But it’s a little bit of crying that, traditionally, had the potential to send the whole system spiraling. At least it was, until a highly visible — 7’4, towering tears — athlete started doing it.

It’s this visibility of emotion, specifically the emotions we equate with sensitivity and vulnerability, that’s so unique when paired with Wembanyama’s expression of them. It reads as oversimplified, even rude (giant man has giant feelings), but when seemingly softer emotions are expressed at billboard-size scale, it’s almost like exposure therapy.

And it’s high-stakes exposure. Prime-time and now, entering the Finals, under the brightest lights and biggest production the NBA has to offer. There’s been a sense that, as the playoffs wore on and the Spurs gained experience, they’d mature, harden. Wembanyama as their leader perhaps most of all. There is, in some corners of fandom and analysis, even a thirst for this. For a young team like San Antonio to get the hope and all these softer expressions — aspiration, jitters, overwhelming joy — roughly knocked out of them.

But this is it. In a world where we’re told not to care, a mindset reinforced daily by the blithe destruction and ravaging of people, their humanity, far and close to home; where a social veer to aggressive, self-serving apathy is threatening to become — if not already — the norm, a demonstrative example of a person extolling the opposite is jarring. That initial jolt can be taken as a threat, or as an opportunity to recalibrate. To be a little more willing to put your own vulnerabilities on display in return.

My interpretation of Wembanyama being put up as face, or saviour, of the league is not that the NBA was lacking the hyper-unique, once-in-an-era skillset he has prior to this; it’s that he offers an alternative to the majority viewing experience of the world writ large right now. You can certainly watch to be entertained, but you can also watch to be infused with a wallop of emotion. The scale of those feelings is difficult to simply switch off with the game, chances are that they will flash over you in the days, months, and more to come. Against disorienting, intolerant darkness, Wembanyama is a roving light to borrow from or burn with.

#care #Victor #Wembanyama #cares">Why do we care so much that Victor Wembanyama cares so much?

For as unpredictable as the NBA can be, it doesn’t get many sea changes. That is, big, overhauling alterations to its topography or behavioral patterns – those things take more time. The 2025-2026 Playoffs have been mercurial, surprising, even enlightening, but it’s still not the basketball that’s brought about the most marked development.

It was clear something was different when the tenor of the NBA aggregator infographics changed. Early in the playoffs the images looked familiar, the usual contextless photos of athletes looking gassed or frustrated churned out with blunt, all-caps missives (OUT, ELIMINATED, CHOKED, BUILT DIFFERENT) from NBA media properties’ social platforms and aggregator sites alike. But then, following the first round, there was a blip.

After the Spurs beat the Blazers in a five-game series, Victor Wembanyama answered a postgame question from L’Equipe’s Maxime Aubin about the cliché that showing emotions signals weakness. As that game ended, Wembanyama visibly choked up on the Spurs bench.

“I think it’s first and foremost a fear of judgment,” Wembanyama told Aubin. “Like, this feeling that you have to act a certain way, social codes, I guess. Personally, I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions.”

In rapid succession, the quote was aggregated, but it wasn’t blunted. At most, the “personally” was lopped off, but infographics of all shapes and sizes (or just two, whatever the optimised dimensions are for Instagram and Twitter) stated, like an awkwardly short affirmation, “I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotions.” There were photos of Wembanyama looking thoughtfully into the middle distance, photos of him screaming in triumph, lots of photos of him crying, face scrunched or buried into the shoulder of a teammate.

That was early May, when the stakes for the Spurs felt light and low. The team has since advanced through two more rounds, besting the Timberwolves in six and dumbfounding the Thunder in seven games of high-flying, arduous, gorgeous basketball. Throughout those 13 contests, Wembanyama’s emotional peaks and valleys have continued to be on prominent display: there have been more tears, more tension, more frustrations and more joy. In the month backdropping those games, the appreciation, even obsession, with Wembanyama’s expressiveness has also grown. Creators outside the traditional NBA media and fan ecosystem have latched on, touting Wembanyama for normalising vulnerability and bringing back demonstratively caring about things. Even within the typically contradictory and oftentimes dour NBA media space of which I am a part, he’s been similarly lauded.

But Wembanyama isn’t the first athlete to articulate how badly he wants to win and to ugly cry when he does. Nor is he the first to grapple with the juxtaposition of that desirousness against the appearance of cold control we still require of our stars. So, what is it about this moment that’s made Wembanyama resonate so deeply, well beyond the NBA? Why do we care so much about Wembanyama caring so much?

Loathe as we are to admit it, we’re creatures of the contemporary world; frogs boiling in whatever noxious soup du jour each new news cycle dumps more ingredients into. Against the backdrop of accumulating global conflicts and the warped language used by our leaders to justify them — “deescalate” into violent escalation, “winding down” that only serves to ramp up — the plain-spoken rejection of a convoluted and long-held status quo hits like a gulp of cold water. Wembanyama handed us the proverbial glass when he rejected the need to be responsible for other people’s discomfort with his emotions, and he’s topped the glass up each time he’s doubled down on being expressive.

There’s a two-fold distinction in Wembanyama’s direct and considered articulation. The first is that he has the perspective of an outsider, because he is one. Basketball is the common ground, a shared language as much as shorthand between him and a majority American NBA fanbase, but his clarity comes from a lifetime prior to now of looking in. The requisite distance needed to hold a place up like a prism and have it catch different streams of light. It was apparent this past winter, when he was one of just a few NBA players to speak up about ICE violently clamping down on people in Minneapolis.

“Every day I wake up and see the news and I’m horrified. It’s crazy that some people might make it sound like it’s acceptable, the murder of civilians. Every day I read the news and I’m asking very deep questions about my own life. But I’m conscious also that saying everything that’s on my mind that would have a cost that’s too great for me right now,” he told media. “I’m a foreigner, I live in this country, I am concerned.”

Asked to clarify if his hesitation to speak came from being a foreigner, Wembanyama said yes.

It was a glimpse into his thought process as a person navigating the delicate intersection he stood at as a French national and non U.S. citizen, as a high-profile athlete, arguably no longer an abstract “future face of the NBA” but the very one actively eclipsing the last generation, and as, foremost, a person who saw injustice and harm and was compelled to speak up. All athletes exist in something of a suspended state of personhood, expected to perform as their outward persona even when they’re off the court. International athletes — especially those in the U.S. in its current sociopolitical climate — exist in a much more temporal state of belonging and tend to keep below the radar.

His articulation has also been bodily. At his stature, his face is a little like a lighthouse. Whatever expression flashes there is impossible to miss. The difference between Wembanyama’s competitive expressiveness and, say, an athlete blowing up on court with vitriol, is that we’re almost more accustomed to the latter. To expressions of frustration and aggression: fights breaking out, equipment being smashed. We’re conditioned to think of these eruptions as part and parcel with the high-stakes and effort of pro sports, proof of concept. But it’s a little bit of crying that, traditionally, had the potential to send the whole system spiraling. At least it was, until a highly visible — 7’4, towering tears — athlete started doing it.

It’s this visibility of emotion, specifically the emotions we equate with sensitivity and vulnerability, that’s so unique when paired with Wembanyama’s expression of them. It reads as oversimplified, even rude (giant man has giant feelings), but when seemingly softer emotions are expressed at billboard-size scale, it’s almost like exposure therapy.

And it’s high-stakes exposure. Prime-time and now, entering the Finals, under the brightest lights and biggest production the NBA has to offer. There’s been a sense that, as the playoffs wore on and the Spurs gained experience, they’d mature, harden. Wembanyama as their leader perhaps most of all. There is, in some corners of fandom and analysis, even a thirst for this. For a young team like San Antonio to get the hope and all these softer expressions — aspiration, jitters, overwhelming joy — roughly knocked out of them.

But this is it. In a world where we’re told not to care, a mindset reinforced daily by the blithe destruction and ravaging of people, their humanity, far and close to home; where a social veer to aggressive, self-serving apathy is threatening to become — if not already — the norm, a demonstrative example of a person extolling the opposite is jarring. That initial jolt can be taken as a threat, or as an opportunity to recalibrate. To be a little more willing to put your own vulnerabilities on display in return.

My interpretation of Wembanyama being put up as face, or saviour, of the league is not that the NBA was lacking the hyper-unique, once-in-an-era skillset he has prior to this; it’s that he offers an alternative to the majority viewing experience of the world writ large right now. You can certainly watch to be entertained, but you can also watch to be infused with a wallop of emotion. The scale of those feelings is difficult to simply switch off with the game, chances are that they will flash over you in the days, months, and more to come. Against disorienting, intolerant darkness, Wembanyama is a roving light to borrow from or burn with.

#care #Victor #Wembanyama #cares

Post Comment