×
Deadspin | Field Level Media’s Top 100 Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft: 1. QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana (6-5, 225) 2. RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame (6-0, 210) 3. TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon (6-3, 245) 4. WR Carnell Tate Ohio State (6-3, 195) 5. OT Spencer Fano Utah (6-4, 300) 6. LB Arvell Reese Ohio State (6-4, 243) 7. EDGE David Bailey Texas Tech (6-3, 247) 8. LB Sonny Styles Ohio State (6-5, 243) 9. EDGE Keldric Faulk Auburn (6-5, 285) 10. OT Kadyn Proctor Alabama (6-7, 365) 11. S Caleb Downs Ohio State (6-1, 200) 12. WR Makai Lemon USC (5-11, 195) 13. OT Francis Mauigoa Miami (6-6, 300) 14. CB Mansoor Delane LSU (6-0, 190) 15. DT Peter Woods Clemson (6-3, 315) 16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Miami (6-2, 270) 17. CB Avieon Terrell Clemson (5-11, 190) 18. WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State (6-2, 200) 19. DT Kayden McDonald Ohio State (6-2, 326) 20. CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee (5-10, 193) 21. OLB Cashius Howell Texas A&M (6-2, 249) 22. CB Colton Hood Tennessee (6-0, 195) 23. CB Brandon Cisse South Carolina (6-0, 190) 24. WR KC Concepcion Texas A&M (5-11, 190) 25. QB Ty Simpson Alabama (6-2, 208) 26. OT Monroe Freeling Georgia (6-7, 315) 27. OT Caleb Lomu Utah (6-6, 300) 28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209) 29. LB Anthony Hill Jr. Texas (6-2, 238) 30. OG Vega Ioane Penn State (6-4, 323) 31. RB Jadarian Price Notre Dame (5-10, 210) 32. C Connor Lew Auburn (6-3, 300) 33. LB Jake Golday Cincinnati (6-4, 240) 34. DT Lee Hunter Texas Tech (6-3, 333) 35. DT Caleb Banks Florida (6-6, 334) 36. CB Chris Johnson San Diego State (6-0, 185) 37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. Indiana (6-0, 204) 38. TE Max Klare Ohio State (6-3, 240) 39. LB CJ Allen Georgia (6-1, 236) 40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor Miami (6-3, 265) 41. CB Will Lee III Texas A&M (6-1, 191) 42. EDGE Joshua Josephs Tennessee (6-3, 240) 43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence UCF (6-4, 247) 44. CB Keith Abney II Arizona State (6-0, 190) 45. QB Taylen Green Arkansas (6-6, 225) 46. OLB R Mason Thomas Oklahoma (6-1, 249) 47. EDGE TJ Parker Clemson (6-3, 255) 48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon Oregon (6-4, 323) 49. OT Max Iheanachor Arizona State (6-5, 325) 50. WR Germie Bernard Alabama (6-1, 209) 51. EDGE Derrick Moore Michigan (6-3, 265) 52. WR Chris Bell Louisville (6-2, 220) 53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335) 54. WR Bryce Lance North Dakota State (6-3, 210) 55. EDGE LT Overton Alabama (6-2, 274) 56. OG Chase Bisontis Texas A&M (6-6, 320) 57. EDGE Zion Young Missouri (6-5, 255) 58. OT Blake Miller Clemson (6-6, 314) 59. DT Domonique Orange Iowa State (6-2, 325) 60. OT Caleb Tiernan Northwestern (6-7, 325) 61. TE Eli Stowers Vanderbilt (6-3, 240) 62. SS Jakobe Thomas Miami (6-2, 200) 63. SS DQ Smith South Carolina (6-1, 209) 64. RB Jonah Coleman Washington (5-9, 225) 65. OT Markel Bell Miami (6-9, 340) 66. WR Ted Hurst Georgia State (6-3, 193) 67. CB Keionte Scott Miami (6-0, 195) 68. C Logan Jones Iowa (6-3, 302) 69. C Brian Parker II Duke (6-5, 300) 70. FS Bud Clark TCU (6-0, 190) 71. LB Harold Perkins Jr. LSU (6-1, 222) 72. SS Jalon Kilgore South Carolina (6-1, 197) 73. CB Charles Demmings Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185) 74. RB Nick Singleton Penn State (6-0, 226) 75. QB Carson Beck Miami (6-4, 225) 76. CB Treydan Stukes Arizona (6-2, 200) 77. CB Hezekiah Masses California (6-1, 185) 78. QB Cade Klubnik Clemson (6-1, 210) 79. FS Genesis Smith Arizona (6-2, 204) 80. FS Dillon Thieneman Oregon (6-0, 205) 81. WR Zachariah Branch Georgia (5-10, 175) 82. WR Chris Brazzell II Tennessee (6-4, 200) 83. SS A.J. Haulcy LSU (5-11, 222) 84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265) 85. WR Antonio Williams Clemson (5-11, 190) 86. OG Gennings Dunker Iowa (6-5, 315) 87. FS Kamari Ramsey USC (6-0, 205) 88. RB Kaytron Allen Penn State (5-11, 220) 89. SS Zakee Wheatley Penn State (6-2, 192) 90. WR Deion Burks Oklahoma (5-9, 190) 91. OT Drew Shelton Penn State (6-5, 305) 92. CB Daylen Everette Georgia (6-0, 193) 93. OG Anez Cooper Miami (6-6, 350) 94. DT Tim Keenan III Alabama (6-2, 320) 95. EDGE Patrick Payton LSU (6-6, 255) 96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia SMU (6-1, 205) 97. CB Julian Neal Arkansas (6-2, 208) 98. CB Tacario Davis Washington (6-4, 200) 99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr. Florida State (6-5, 337) 100. EDGE Max Llewellyn Iowa (6-5, 263) –Field Level Media #Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #Top

Deadspin | Field Level Media’s Top 100
Deadspin | Field Level Media’s Top 100 Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft: 1. QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana (6-5, 225) 2. RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame (6-0, 210) 3. TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon (6-3, 245) 4. WR Carnell Tate Ohio State (6-3, 195) 5. OT Spencer Fano Utah (6-4, 300) 6. LB Arvell Reese Ohio State (6-4, 243) 7. EDGE David Bailey Texas Tech (6-3, 247) 8. LB Sonny Styles Ohio State (6-5, 243) 9. EDGE Keldric Faulk Auburn (6-5, 285) 10. OT Kadyn Proctor Alabama (6-7, 365) 11. S Caleb Downs Ohio State (6-1, 200) 12. WR Makai Lemon USC (5-11, 195) 13. OT Francis Mauigoa Miami (6-6, 300) 14. CB Mansoor Delane LSU (6-0, 190) 15. DT Peter Woods Clemson (6-3, 315) 16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Miami (6-2, 270) 17. CB Avieon Terrell Clemson (5-11, 190) 18. WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State (6-2, 200) 19. DT Kayden McDonald Ohio State (6-2, 326) 20. CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee (5-10, 193) 21. OLB Cashius Howell Texas A&M (6-2, 249) 22. CB Colton Hood Tennessee (6-0, 195) 23. CB Brandon Cisse South Carolina (6-0, 190) 24. WR KC Concepcion Texas A&M (5-11, 190) 25. QB Ty Simpson Alabama (6-2, 208) 26. OT Monroe Freeling Georgia (6-7, 315) 27. OT Caleb Lomu Utah (6-6, 300) 28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209) 29. LB Anthony Hill Jr. Texas (6-2, 238) 30. OG Vega Ioane Penn State (6-4, 323) 31. RB Jadarian Price Notre Dame (5-10, 210) 32. C Connor Lew Auburn (6-3, 300) 33. LB Jake Golday Cincinnati (6-4, 240) 34. DT Lee Hunter Texas Tech (6-3, 333) 35. DT Caleb Banks Florida (6-6, 334) 36. CB Chris Johnson San Diego State (6-0, 185) 37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. Indiana (6-0, 204) 38. TE Max Klare Ohio State (6-3, 240) 39. LB CJ Allen Georgia (6-1, 236) 40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor Miami (6-3, 265) 41. CB Will Lee III Texas A&M (6-1, 191) 42. EDGE Joshua Josephs Tennessee (6-3, 240) 43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence UCF (6-4, 247) 44. CB Keith Abney II Arizona State (6-0, 190) 45. QB Taylen Green Arkansas (6-6, 225) 46. OLB R Mason Thomas Oklahoma (6-1, 249) 47. EDGE TJ Parker Clemson (6-3, 255) 48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon Oregon (6-4, 323) 49. OT Max Iheanachor Arizona State (6-5, 325) 50. WR Germie Bernard Alabama (6-1, 209) 51. EDGE Derrick Moore Michigan (6-3, 265) 52. WR Chris Bell Louisville (6-2, 220) 53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335) 54. WR Bryce Lance North Dakota State (6-3, 210) 55. EDGE LT Overton Alabama (6-2, 274) 56. OG Chase Bisontis Texas A&M (6-6, 320) 57. EDGE Zion Young Missouri (6-5, 255) 58. OT Blake Miller Clemson (6-6, 314) 59. DT Domonique Orange Iowa State (6-2, 325) 60. OT Caleb Tiernan Northwestern (6-7, 325) 61. TE Eli Stowers Vanderbilt (6-3, 240) 62. SS Jakobe Thomas Miami (6-2, 200) 63. SS DQ Smith South Carolina (6-1, 209) 64. RB Jonah Coleman Washington (5-9, 225) 65. OT Markel Bell Miami (6-9, 340) 66. WR Ted Hurst Georgia State (6-3, 193) 67. CB Keionte Scott Miami (6-0, 195) 68. C Logan Jones Iowa (6-3, 302) 69. C Brian Parker II Duke (6-5, 300) 70. FS Bud Clark TCU (6-0, 190) 71. LB Harold Perkins Jr. LSU (6-1, 222) 72. SS Jalon Kilgore South Carolina (6-1, 197) 73. CB Charles Demmings Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185) 74. RB Nick Singleton Penn State (6-0, 226) 75. QB Carson Beck Miami (6-4, 225) 76. CB Treydan Stukes Arizona (6-2, 200) 77. CB Hezekiah Masses California (6-1, 185) 78. QB Cade Klubnik Clemson (6-1, 210) 79. FS Genesis Smith Arizona (6-2, 204) 80. FS Dillon Thieneman Oregon (6-0, 205) 81. WR Zachariah Branch Georgia (5-10, 175) 82. WR Chris Brazzell II Tennessee (6-4, 200) 83. SS A.J. Haulcy LSU (5-11, 222) 84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265) 85. WR Antonio Williams Clemson (5-11, 190) 86. OG Gennings Dunker Iowa (6-5, 315) 87. FS Kamari Ramsey USC (6-0, 205) 88. RB Kaytron Allen Penn State (5-11, 220) 89. SS Zakee Wheatley Penn State (6-2, 192) 90. WR Deion Burks Oklahoma (5-9, 190) 91. OT Drew Shelton Penn State (6-5, 305) 92. CB Daylen Everette Georgia (6-0, 193) 93. OG Anez Cooper Miami (6-6, 350) 94. DT Tim Keenan III Alabama (6-2, 320) 95. EDGE Patrick Payton LSU (6-6, 255) 96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia SMU (6-1, 205) 97. CB Julian Neal Arkansas (6-2, 208) 98. CB Tacario Davis Washington (6-4, 200) 99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr. Florida State (6-5, 337) 100. EDGE Max Llewellyn Iowa (6-5, 263) –Field Level Media #Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #TopIndiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:

1. QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana (6-5, 225)

2. RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame (6-0, 210)

3. TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon (6-3, 245)

4. WR Carnell Tate Ohio State (6-3, 195)

5. OT Spencer Fano Utah (6-4, 300)

6. LB Arvell Reese Ohio State (6-4, 243)

7. EDGE David Bailey Texas Tech (6-3, 247)

8. LB Sonny Styles Ohio State (6-5, 243)

9. EDGE Keldric Faulk Auburn (6-5, 285)

10. OT Kadyn Proctor Alabama (6-7, 365)

11. S Caleb Downs Ohio State (6-1, 200)

12. WR Makai Lemon USC (5-11, 195)

13. OT Francis Mauigoa Miami (6-6, 300)

14. CB Mansoor Delane LSU (6-0, 190)

15. DT Peter Woods Clemson (6-3, 315)

16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Miami (6-2, 270)

17. CB Avieon Terrell Clemson (5-11, 190)

18. WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State (6-2, 200)

19. DT Kayden McDonald Ohio State (6-2, 326)

20. CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee (5-10, 193)

21. OLB Cashius Howell Texas A&M (6-2, 249)

22. CB Colton Hood Tennessee (6-0, 195)

23. CB Brandon Cisse South Carolina (6-0, 190)

24. WR KC Concepcion Texas A&M (5-11, 190)

25. QB Ty Simpson Alabama (6-2, 208)

26. OT Monroe Freeling Georgia (6-7, 315)

27. OT Caleb Lomu Utah (6-6, 300)

28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)

29. LB Anthony Hill Jr. Texas (6-2, 238)

30. OG Vega Ioane Penn State (6-4, 323)

31. RB Jadarian Price Notre Dame (5-10, 210)

32. C Connor Lew Auburn (6-3, 300)

33. LB Jake Golday Cincinnati (6-4, 240)

34. DT Lee Hunter Texas Tech (6-3, 333)

35. DT Caleb Banks Florida (6-6, 334)

36. CB Chris Johnson San Diego State (6-0, 185)

37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. Indiana (6-0, 204)

38. TE Max Klare Ohio State (6-3, 240)

39. LB CJ Allen Georgia (6-1, 236)

40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor Miami (6-3, 265)

41. CB Will Lee III Texas A&M (6-1, 191)

42. EDGE Joshua Josephs Tennessee (6-3, 240)

43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence UCF (6-4, 247)

44. CB Keith Abney II Arizona State (6-0, 190)

45. QB Taylen Green Arkansas (6-6, 225)

46. OLB R Mason Thomas Oklahoma (6-1, 249)

47. EDGE TJ Parker Clemson (6-3, 255)

48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon Oregon (6-4, 323)

49. OT Max Iheanachor Arizona State (6-5, 325)


50. WR Germie Bernard Alabama (6-1, 209)

51. EDGE Derrick Moore Michigan (6-3, 265)

52. WR Chris Bell Louisville (6-2, 220)

53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)

54. WR Bryce Lance North Dakota State (6-3, 210)

55. EDGE LT Overton Alabama (6-2, 274)

56. OG Chase Bisontis Texas A&M (6-6, 320)

57. EDGE Zion Young Missouri (6-5, 255)

58. OT Blake Miller Clemson (6-6, 314)

59. DT Domonique Orange Iowa State (6-2, 325)

60. OT Caleb Tiernan Northwestern (6-7, 325)

61. TE Eli Stowers Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)

62. SS Jakobe Thomas Miami (6-2, 200)

63. SS DQ Smith South Carolina (6-1, 209)

64. RB Jonah Coleman Washington (5-9, 225)

65. OT Markel Bell Miami (6-9, 340)

66. WR Ted Hurst Georgia State (6-3, 193)

67. CB Keionte Scott Miami (6-0, 195)

68. C Logan Jones Iowa (6-3, 302)

69. C Brian Parker II Duke (6-5, 300)

70. FS Bud Clark TCU (6-0, 190)

71. LB Harold Perkins Jr. LSU (6-1, 222)

72. SS Jalon Kilgore South Carolina (6-1, 197)

73. CB Charles Demmings Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)

74. RB Nick Singleton Penn State (6-0, 226)

75. QB Carson Beck Miami (6-4, 225)

76. CB Treydan Stukes Arizona (6-2, 200)

77. CB Hezekiah Masses California (6-1, 185)

78. QB Cade Klubnik Clemson (6-1, 210)

79. FS Genesis Smith Arizona (6-2, 204)

80. FS Dillon Thieneman Oregon (6-0, 205)

81. WR Zachariah Branch Georgia (5-10, 175)

82. WR Chris Brazzell II Tennessee (6-4, 200)

83. SS A.J. Haulcy LSU (5-11, 222)

84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)

85. WR Antonio Williams Clemson (5-11, 190)

86. OG Gennings Dunker Iowa (6-5, 315)

87. FS Kamari Ramsey USC (6-0, 205)

88. RB Kaytron Allen Penn State (5-11, 220)

89. SS Zakee Wheatley Penn State (6-2, 192)

90. WR Deion Burks Oklahoma (5-9, 190)

91. OT Drew Shelton Penn State (6-5, 305)

92. CB Daylen Everette Georgia (6-0, 193)

93. OG Anez Cooper Miami (6-6, 350)

94. DT Tim Keenan III Alabama (6-2, 320)

95. EDGE Patrick Payton LSU (6-6, 255)

96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia SMU (6-1, 205)

97. CB Julian Neal Arkansas (6-2, 208)

98. CB Tacario Davis Washington (6-4, 200)

99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr. Florida State (6-5, 337)

100. EDGE Max Llewellyn Iowa (6-5, 263)


–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #Top

Sports news

Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza — QB11 at the NFL Scouting Combine — greets Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson (QB17) at Lucas Oil Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Field Level Media Top 100 rankings for the 2026 NFL Draft:

1. QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana (6-5, 225)

2. RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame (6-0, 210)

3. TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon (6-3, 245)

4. WR Carnell Tate Ohio State (6-3, 195)

5. OT Spencer Fano Utah (6-4, 300)

6. LB Arvell Reese Ohio State (6-4, 243)

7. EDGE David Bailey Texas Tech (6-3, 247)

8. LB Sonny Styles Ohio State (6-5, 243)

9. EDGE Keldric Faulk Auburn (6-5, 285)

10. OT Kadyn Proctor Alabama (6-7, 365)

11. S Caleb Downs Ohio State (6-1, 200)

12. WR Makai Lemon USC (5-11, 195)

13. OT Francis Mauigoa Miami (6-6, 300)

14. CB Mansoor Delane LSU (6-0, 190)

15. DT Peter Woods Clemson (6-3, 315)

16. EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Miami (6-2, 270)

17. CB Avieon Terrell Clemson (5-11, 190)

18. WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State (6-2, 200)

19. DT Kayden McDonald Ohio State (6-2, 326)

20. CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee (5-10, 193)

21. OLB Cashius Howell Texas A&M (6-2, 249)

22. CB Colton Hood Tennessee (6-0, 195)

23. CB Brandon Cisse South Carolina (6-0, 190)

24. WR KC Concepcion Texas A&M (5-11, 190)

25. QB Ty Simpson Alabama (6-2, 208)

26. OT Monroe Freeling Georgia (6-7, 315)

27. OT Caleb Lomu Utah (6-6, 300)

28. FS Emmanuel McNeil-Warren Toledo (6-3, 209)

29. LB Anthony Hill Jr. Texas (6-2, 238)

30. OG Vega Ioane Penn State (6-4, 323)

31. RB Jadarian Price Notre Dame (5-10, 210)

32. C Connor Lew Auburn (6-3, 300)

33. LB Jake Golday Cincinnati (6-4, 240)

34. DT Lee Hunter Texas Tech (6-3, 333)

35. DT Caleb Banks Florida (6-6, 334)

36. CB Chris Johnson San Diego State (6-0, 185)

37. WR Omar Cooper Jr. Indiana (6-0, 204)

38. TE Max Klare Ohio State (6-3, 240)

39. LB CJ Allen Georgia (6-1, 236)

40. EDGE Akheem Mesidor Miami (6-3, 265)

41. CB Will Lee III Texas A&M (6-1, 191)

42. EDGE Joshua Josephs Tennessee (6-3, 240)

43. EDGE Malachi Lawrence UCF (6-4, 247)

44. CB Keith Abney II Arizona State (6-0, 190)

45. QB Taylen Green Arkansas (6-6, 225)

46. OLB R Mason Thomas Oklahoma (6-1, 249)

47. EDGE TJ Parker Clemson (6-3, 255)

48. OG Emmanuel Pregnon Oregon (6-4, 323)

49. OT Max Iheanachor Arizona State (6-5, 325)

50. WR Germie Bernard Alabama (6-1, 209)

51. EDGE Derrick Moore Michigan (6-3, 265)

52. WR Chris Bell Louisville (6-2, 220)

53. OT Dametrious Crownover Texas A&M (6-6, 335)

54. WR Bryce Lance North Dakota State (6-3, 210)

55. EDGE LT Overton Alabama (6-2, 274)

56. OG Chase Bisontis Texas A&M (6-6, 320)

57. EDGE Zion Young Missouri (6-5, 255)

58. OT Blake Miller Clemson (6-6, 314)

59. DT Domonique Orange Iowa State (6-2, 325)

60. OT Caleb Tiernan Northwestern (6-7, 325)

61. TE Eli Stowers Vanderbilt (6-3, 240)

62. SS Jakobe Thomas Miami (6-2, 200)

63. SS DQ Smith South Carolina (6-1, 209)

64. RB Jonah Coleman Washington (5-9, 225)

65. OT Markel Bell Miami (6-9, 340)

66. WR Ted Hurst Georgia State (6-3, 193)

67. CB Keionte Scott Miami (6-0, 195)

68. C Logan Jones Iowa (6-3, 302)

69. C Brian Parker II Duke (6-5, 300)

70. FS Bud Clark TCU (6-0, 190)

71. LB Harold Perkins Jr. LSU (6-1, 222)

72. SS Jalon Kilgore South Carolina (6-1, 197)

73. CB Charles Demmings Stephen F. Austin (6-0, 185)

74. RB Nick Singleton Penn State (6-0, 226)

75. QB Carson Beck Miami (6-4, 225)

76. CB Treydan Stukes Arizona (6-2, 200)

77. CB Hezekiah Masses California (6-1, 185)

78. QB Cade Klubnik Clemson (6-1, 210)

79. FS Genesis Smith Arizona (6-2, 204)

80. FS Dillon Thieneman Oregon (6-0, 205)

81. WR Zachariah Branch Georgia (5-10, 175)

82. WR Chris Brazzell II Tennessee (6-4, 200)

83. SS A.J. Haulcy LSU (5-11, 222)

84. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton Penn State (6-5, 265)

85. WR Antonio Williams Clemson (5-11, 190)

86. OG Gennings Dunker Iowa (6-5, 315)

87. FS Kamari Ramsey USC (6-0, 205)

88. RB Kaytron Allen Penn State (5-11, 220)

89. SS Zakee Wheatley Penn State (6-2, 192)

90. WR Deion Burks Oklahoma (5-9, 190)

91. OT Drew Shelton Penn State (6-5, 305)

92. CB Daylen Everette Georgia (6-0, 193)

93. OG Anez Cooper Miami (6-6, 350)

94. DT Tim Keenan III Alabama (6-2, 320)

95. EDGE Patrick Payton LSU (6-6, 255)

96. FS Isaiah Nwokobia SMU (6-1, 205)

97. CB Julian Neal Arkansas (6-2, 208)

98. CB Tacario Davis Washington (6-4, 200)

99. DT Darrell Jackson Jr. Florida State (6-5, 337)

100. EDGE Max Llewellyn Iowa (6-5, 263)

–Field Level Media

Source link
#Deadspin #Field #Level #Medias #Top

Previous post

Deadspin | Peyton Stearns earns chance to face 3-time Madrid champ <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/26743985.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/26743985.jpg" alt="Tennis: National Bank Open" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Jul 30, 2025; Montreal, QC, Canada; Peyton Stearns (USA) returns the ball to Emma Raducanu (GBR) in second round play at IGA Stadium. Mandatory Credit: David Kirouac-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>Peyton Stearns defeated France’s Lois Boisson 6-1, 6-3 in 65 minutes as first-round action got underway Tuesday at the Mutua Madrid Open.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>Stearns’ reward is a matchup with defending champ and No. 1 seed Aryna Sabalenka of Belarus, a three-time winner of the WTA 1000 clay-court tournament in the Spanish capital.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>Stearns never trailed in her opener, saving both break points she faced and converting four of her six break chances against Boisson.</p> </section><section id="section-4"> <p>Fellow American Venus Williams was not as fortunate against 20-year-old Spaniard Kaitlin Quevedo, who prevailed 6-2, 6-4 in one hour and 43 minutes. It was the 10th straight singles loss for Williams, 45, an invited player who was competing on clay for the first time since Roland Garros in 2021.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-5"> <p>Williams, whose sister Serena won this event in 2012 and 2013, won her first WTA title in 1998 — eight years before her opponent was born.</p> </section> <section id="section-6"> <p>Of the 10 singles matches played Tuesday, only one went to three sets. Austria’s Julia Grabher outlasted Spain’s Paula Badosa 7-6 (3), 4-6, 6-0 in two hours and 32 minutes.</p> </section><section id="section-7"> <p>Camila Osorio of Columbia needed only 65 minutes to complete a 6-0, 6-3 win against Russia’s Anastasia Zakharova. Poland’s Magda Linette defeated Robin Montgomery 6-4, 6-3. Hungary’s Anna Bonder posted a 6-2, 6-3 win against Switzerland’s Viktorija Golubic. </p> </section><section id="section-8"> <p>Spain’s Jessica Bouzas Maneiro was a swift 6-1, 6-1 winner against Brazil’s Beatriz Haddad Maia. Laura Siegemund of Germany eliminated Romania’s Irina-Camelia Begu 6-4, 6-0. Petra Marcinko of Croatia earned a 6-0, 7-5 victory over Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva of Andorra, and Czech Laura Samson won 6-4, 6-2 against Germany’s Tatjana Maria.</p> </section><section id="section-9"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section></div> #Deadspin #Peyton #Stearns #earns #chance #face #3time #Madrid #champ

Next post

Knicks and Nuggets Blow Big Leads: What Went Wrong in Game 2? | Deadspin.com <div id="section-1"> <p>Roughly 5,000 feet of elevation separate Denver and New York City.</p><p>Still, gravity works the same regardless of where one stands. Just ask the NBA teams in both towns.</p><p>“You get too high, and you get, I don’t want to say cocky, but feeling yourself,” Nuggets guard Tim Hardaway Jr. said.</p><p>That sensation went south on either side of the country Monday night.</p><p>After squandering sizable leads that would have cemented commanding 2-0 advantages in their respective first-round playoff series, the Nuggets and Knicks now find themselves bracing for a fight.</p><p>Should their opponents ultimately have their number, Denver and New York will look back with disdain on 19 and 14. Those were the Game 2 cushions the teams coughed up as the No. 3 seeds in the Eastern and Western Conference.</p><p>“It’s a game we should’ve won,” <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/04/20/sports/knicks-collapse-in-stunning-game-2-loss-to-let-hawks-even-series/" target="_blank">Knicks guard Josh Hart said</a>. “In the playoffs, we can’t give away games.”</p><p>Be that as it may, the Knicks did just that <a href="https://deadspin.com/which-nba-playoffs-game-1-loser-is-most-likely-to-win-their-series" target="_blank">against the Atlanta Hawks</a>. They controlled the outcome for much of the night and took a 12-point edge into the fourth quarter after leading by as many as 14.</p><p>Then New York shot 5-for-22 from the floor in the final 12 minutes compared to 10-for-15 for Atlanta. Fighting through vulgar chants from the Madison Square Garden faithful, Hawks star CJ McCullom scored six straight points down the stretch during one key sequence on the way to a game-high 32.</p><p>“In that fourth quarter, you could tell [the Hawks] were playing with a level of desperation,” Knicks coach Mike Brown said. “There were four 50-50 balls, and they got three of the four. We always use that stat to gauge the level of aggression in a game. In that fourth quarter, their aggression stepped up.”</p><p>New York’s melted at the same time. How many late possessions saw the Knicks pass or hold the ball around the perimeter before settling for subpar looks from 3-point range? The Knicks went 3-for-11 from deep as part of their flop.</p><p>Denver led the Minnesota Timberwolves by 19 points early in the second quarter before crumbling. The Nuggets still were ahead by three points to start the fourth quarter but a combined 2-for-12 shooting effort from pillars Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray in the final 12 minutes took a toll.</p><p>“I feel like we had the game in hand, and then we just didn’t make our shots,” Murray said.</p><p>As with the Knicks and Hawks, the reversal of fortunes stemmed both from the hosts’ miscues and an outstanding effort from a visiting player, as Minnesota’s Anthony Edwards had 30 points.</p><p>“Great leadership, positive,” Timberwolves coach Chris Finch said. “He recognized he needed to get into attack mode and get downhill a little bit more. He did that.”</p><p>The Knicks and Nuggets no doubt sensed the need to amp up their own urgency as things started slipping away Monday.</p><p>That neither could act upon it didn’t signal the end for either New York or Denver, of course. But now there’s unnecessary added weight for the climb back to the top.</p> </div> #Knicks #Nuggets #Blow #Big #Leads #Wrong #Game #Deadspin.com

Related Posts

Deadspin | Report: Wolves sign Ayo Dosunmu to 5-year, 2M deal May 8, 2026; Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Minnesota Timberwolves guard Ayo Dosunmu (13) against the San Antonio Spurs in the first half during game three of the second round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at Target Center. Mandatory Credit: Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images Guard Ayo Dosunmu bypassed free agency to stay with the Minnesota Timberwolves on a five-year, 2 million contract, multiple outlets reported Tuesday. The fifth season is a player option, according to reports. Minnesota traded three-time All-Star Julius Randle to the Brooklyn Nets on Monday, freeing the cash from Randle’s salary and opening a salary exception to cover Dosunmu’s bigger paycheck. Dosunmu was playing on the final season of a three-year, million contract when the Timberwolves acquired the Illinois native from the Chicago Bulls on Feb. 5. The deal sent Dosunmu, Julian Phillips and a 2031 second-round draft pick to Minnesota for former lottery pick Rob Dillingham, Leonard Miller and three future second-round picks. With the Timberwolves, Dosunmu appeared in 24 regular-season games (nine starts) and averaged 14.4 points, 4.2 rebounds and 3.5 assists. Maybe just as crucial was the strong on-court connection that he and point guard Anthony Edwards made. He was limited to 10 playoff games (four starts) because of right calf tightness that ailed him late in the season. He still was a key contributor. He averaged 15.6 points, 3.6 rebounds, 4.1 assists and 29.2 minutes per game in the playoffs. For the entire 2025-26 season, Dosunmu appeared in 69 games (19 starts) with the Bulls and Wolves. He averaged 27.3 minutes, 14.4 points, 3.6 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game, shooting 43.9% from 3-point range and 87.6% from the foul line. –Field Level Media #Deadspin #Report #Wolves #sign #Ayo #Dosunmu #5year #112M #dealMay 8, 2026; Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Minnesota Timberwolves guard Ayo Dosunmu (13) against the San Antonio Spurs in the first half during game three of the second round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at Target Center. Mandatory Credit: Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

Guard Ayo Dosunmu bypassed free agency to stay with the Minnesota Timberwolves on a five-year, $112 million contract, multiple outlets reported Tuesday.

The fifth season is a player option, according to reports.

Minnesota traded three-time All-Star Julius Randle to the Brooklyn Nets on Monday, freeing the cash from Randle’s salary and opening a salary exception to cover Dosunmu’s bigger paycheck.


Dosunmu was playing on the final season of a three-year, $21 million contract when the Timberwolves acquired the Illinois native from the Chicago Bulls on Feb. 5. The deal sent Dosunmu, Julian Phillips and a 2031 second-round draft pick to Minnesota for former lottery pick Rob Dillingham, Leonard Miller and three future second-round picks.

With the Timberwolves, Dosunmu appeared in 24 regular-season games (nine starts) and averaged 14.4 points, 4.2 rebounds and 3.5 assists. Maybe just as crucial was the strong on-court connection that he and point guard Anthony Edwards made.

He was limited to 10 playoff games (four starts) because of right calf tightness that ailed him late in the season. He still was a key contributor. He averaged 15.6 points, 3.6 rebounds, 4.1 assists and 29.2 minutes per game in the playoffs.

For the entire 2025-26 season, Dosunmu appeared in 69 games (19 starts) with the Bulls and Wolves. He averaged 27.3 minutes, 14.4 points, 3.6 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game, shooting 43.9% from 3-point range and 87.6% from the foul line.


–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #Report #Wolves #sign #Ayo #Dosunmu #5year #112M #deal">Deadspin | Report: Wolves sign Ayo Dosunmu to 5-year, 2M deal May 8, 2026; Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Minnesota Timberwolves guard Ayo Dosunmu (13) against the San Antonio Spurs in the first half during game three of the second round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at Target Center. Mandatory Credit: Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images Guard Ayo Dosunmu bypassed free agency to stay with the Minnesota Timberwolves on a five-year, 2 million contract, multiple outlets reported Tuesday. The fifth season is a player option, according to reports. Minnesota traded three-time All-Star Julius Randle to the Brooklyn Nets on Monday, freeing the cash from Randle’s salary and opening a salary exception to cover Dosunmu’s bigger paycheck. Dosunmu was playing on the final season of a three-year, million contract when the Timberwolves acquired the Illinois native from the Chicago Bulls on Feb. 5. The deal sent Dosunmu, Julian Phillips and a 2031 second-round draft pick to Minnesota for former lottery pick Rob Dillingham, Leonard Miller and three future second-round picks. With the Timberwolves, Dosunmu appeared in 24 regular-season games (nine starts) and averaged 14.4 points, 4.2 rebounds and 3.5 assists. Maybe just as crucial was the strong on-court connection that he and point guard Anthony Edwards made. He was limited to 10 playoff games (four starts) because of right calf tightness that ailed him late in the season. He still was a key contributor. He averaged 15.6 points, 3.6 rebounds, 4.1 assists and 29.2 minutes per game in the playoffs. For the entire 2025-26 season, Dosunmu appeared in 69 games (19 starts) with the Bulls and Wolves. He averaged 27.3 minutes, 14.4 points, 3.6 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game, shooting 43.9% from 3-point range and 87.6% from the foul line. –Field Level Media #Deadspin #Report #Wolves #sign #Ayo #Dosunmu #5year #112M #deal

Tuesday at the 2026 FIFA World Cup offers up a pair of matches in Group K.

One match could see a team book a spot in the Round of 32.

The other match could see a team eliminated.

Colombia has a chance to clinch a spot in the Round of 32 against DR Congo, and could also win the group depending on the result between Portugal and Uzbekistan. For Uzbekistan, elimination is possible depending on how they fair against Cristiano Ronaldo and company.

Here are the scenarios in Group K heading into the second set of matches in group play.

Update: Following Portugal’s 5-0 win over Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan is on the brink of elimination. A win by DR Congo against Colombia later tonight would eliminate Uzbekistan.

What are the standings in Group K?

Ahead of the matches set for June 23, here are the scenarios in Group K.

Team

W

D

L

GF

GA

GD

Points

Portugal11061+54
Colombia10031+23
DR Congo0101111
Uzbekistan00218-70

What are the next matches in Group K?

Here are the four remaining matches in Group K, starting with the pair set for Tuesday, June 23. All times listed are Eastern.

Portugal 5, Uzbekistan 0
Colombia vs. DR Congo, 10:00 p.m.

Colombia vs. Portugal, 7:30 p.m.
DR Congo vs. Uzbekistan, 7:30 p.m.

What are the scenarios in Group K?

Here are the scenarios in Group K, ahead of the second set of matches.

Colombia can guarantee a spot in the Round of 32 as one of the top two teams in Group K with a win against DR Congo. They will clinch a spot in the Round of 32 as the winners of Group K if they beat DR Congo, and Portugal loses or draws against Uzbekistan. If Portugal wins against Uzbekistan, they would move to four points, with Colombia on six points. That would give Portugal a chance to win Group K in the final set of matches with a win over Colombia.

Uzbekistan will be eliminated from knockout round contention with a loss to Portugal, and a DR Congo win against Colombia.

With a point from the first matches, both these teams cannot be eliminated on Tuesday. However, neither can book a spot in the Round of 32.

What about tiebreakers in Group K?

Here is how tiebreakers work at the World Cup this year. If two or more teams in the same group are equal on points following the group stage, a three-step process will be followed to determine tiebreakers.

In the first step, the greatest number of points in the group matches between the tied teams will be applied. Then, the superior goal difference from the group matches between the tied teams will be applied, and finally, the greatest number of goals scored in all group matches between the tied teams will be applied.

If that cannot determine a tiebreaker, then the teams that are still equal will advance to step two. In this stage, the first step is the goal difference in all group matches, then the greatest number of goals in all group matches, and finally the highest team conduct score (relating to yellow and red cards) will be applied.

If that does not break the tie, then the teams still equal on points will be ranked according to the most recent FIFA World Rankings.

That first step, which reads “greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned” according to FIFA, effectively turns into a head-to-head tiebreaker in the case of ties between two teams.

Ahead of the second matches in Group K, the tiebreakers are not a factor. We’ll revisit this section as needed.

#World #Cup #knockout #scenarios #Group">World Cup 2026: What are the knockout round scenarios in Group K? Tuesday at the 2026 FIFA World Cup offers up a pair of matches in Group K.One match could see a team book a spot in the Round of 32.The other match could see a team eliminated.Colombia has a chance to clinch a spot in the Round of 32 against DR Congo, and could also win the group depending on the result between Portugal and Uzbekistan. For Uzbekistan, elimination is possible depending on how they fair against Cristiano Ronaldo and company.Here are the scenarios in Group K heading into the second set of matches in group play.Update: Following Portugal’s 5-0 win over Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan is on the brink of elimination. A win by DR Congo against Colombia later tonight would eliminate Uzbekistan.What are the standings in Group K?Ahead of the matches set for June 23, here are the scenarios in Group K.TeamWDLGFGAGDPointsPortugal11061+54Colombia10031+23DR Congo0101111Uzbekistan00218-70What are the next matches in Group K?Here are the four remaining matches in Group K, starting with the pair set for Tuesday, June 23. All times listed are Eastern.Portugal 5, Uzbekistan 0Colombia vs. DR Congo, 10:00 p.m.Colombia vs. Portugal, 7:30 p.m.DR Congo vs. Uzbekistan, 7:30 p.m.What are the scenarios in Group K?Here are the scenarios in Group K, ahead of the second set of matches.Colombia can guarantee a spot in the Round of 32 as one of the top two teams in Group K with a win against DR Congo. They will clinch a spot in the Round of 32 as the winners of Group K if they beat DR Congo, and Portugal loses or draws against Uzbekistan. If Portugal wins against Uzbekistan, they would move to four points, with Colombia on six points. That would give Portugal a chance to win Group K in the final set of matches with a win over Colombia.Uzbekistan will be eliminated from knockout round contention with a loss to Portugal, and a DR Congo win against Colombia.With a point from the first matches, both these teams cannot be eliminated on Tuesday. However, neither can book a spot in the Round of 32.What about tiebreakers in Group K?Here is how tiebreakers work at the World Cup this year. If two or more teams in the same group are equal on points following the group stage, a three-step process will be followed to determine tiebreakers.In the first step, the greatest number of points in the group matches between the tied teams will be applied. Then, the superior goal difference from the group matches between the tied teams will be applied, and finally, the greatest number of goals scored in all group matches between the tied teams will be applied.If that cannot determine a tiebreaker, then the teams that are still equal will advance to step two. In this stage, the first step is the goal difference in all group matches, then the greatest number of goals in all group matches, and finally the highest team conduct score (relating to yellow and red cards) will be applied.If that does not break the tie, then the teams still equal on points will be ranked according to the most recent FIFA World Rankings.That first step, which reads “greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned” according to FIFA, effectively turns into a head-to-head tiebreaker in the case of ties between two teams.Ahead of the second matches in Group K, the tiebreakers are not a factor. We’ll revisit this section as needed. #World #Cup #knockout #scenarios #Group

FIFA World Rankings.

That first step, which reads “greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned” according to FIFA, effectively turns into a head-to-head tiebreaker in the case of ties between two teams.

Ahead of the second matches in Group K, the tiebreakers are not a factor. We’ll revisit this section as needed.

#World #Cup #knockout #scenarios #Group">World Cup 2026: What are the knockout round scenarios in Group K?

Tuesday at the 2026 FIFA World Cup offers up a pair of matches in Group K.

One match could see a team book a spot in the Round of 32.

The other match could see a team eliminated.

Colombia has a chance to clinch a spot in the Round of 32 against DR Congo, and could also win the group depending on the result between Portugal and Uzbekistan. For Uzbekistan, elimination is possible depending on how they fair against Cristiano Ronaldo and company.

Here are the scenarios in Group K heading into the second set of matches in group play.

Update: Following Portugal’s 5-0 win over Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan is on the brink of elimination. A win by DR Congo against Colombia later tonight would eliminate Uzbekistan.

What are the standings in Group K?

Ahead of the matches set for June 23, here are the scenarios in Group K.

Team

W

D

L

GF

GA

GD

Points

Portugal11061+54
Colombia10031+23
DR Congo0101111
Uzbekistan00218-70

What are the next matches in Group K?

Here are the four remaining matches in Group K, starting with the pair set for Tuesday, June 23. All times listed are Eastern.

Portugal 5, Uzbekistan 0
Colombia vs. DR Congo, 10:00 p.m.

Colombia vs. Portugal, 7:30 p.m.
DR Congo vs. Uzbekistan, 7:30 p.m.

What are the scenarios in Group K?

Here are the scenarios in Group K, ahead of the second set of matches.

Colombia can guarantee a spot in the Round of 32 as one of the top two teams in Group K with a win against DR Congo. They will clinch a spot in the Round of 32 as the winners of Group K if they beat DR Congo, and Portugal loses or draws against Uzbekistan. If Portugal wins against Uzbekistan, they would move to four points, with Colombia on six points. That would give Portugal a chance to win Group K in the final set of matches with a win over Colombia.

Uzbekistan will be eliminated from knockout round contention with a loss to Portugal, and a DR Congo win against Colombia.

With a point from the first matches, both these teams cannot be eliminated on Tuesday. However, neither can book a spot in the Round of 32.

What about tiebreakers in Group K?

Here is how tiebreakers work at the World Cup this year. If two or more teams in the same group are equal on points following the group stage, a three-step process will be followed to determine tiebreakers.

In the first step, the greatest number of points in the group matches between the tied teams will be applied. Then, the superior goal difference from the group matches between the tied teams will be applied, and finally, the greatest number of goals scored in all group matches between the tied teams will be applied.

If that cannot determine a tiebreaker, then the teams that are still equal will advance to step two. In this stage, the first step is the goal difference in all group matches, then the greatest number of goals in all group matches, and finally the highest team conduct score (relating to yellow and red cards) will be applied.

If that does not break the tie, then the teams still equal on points will be ranked according to the most recent FIFA World Rankings.

That first step, which reads “greatest number of points obtained in the group matches between the teams concerned” according to FIFA, effectively turns into a head-to-head tiebreaker in the case of ties between two teams.

Ahead of the second matches in Group K, the tiebreakers are not a factor. We’ll revisit this section as needed.

#World #Cup #knockout #scenarios #Group

Declan Rice during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Group L match between England and Croatia. | Photo Credit: Getty Images

elcome to Sportstar’s live coverage from the FIFA World Cup 2026 Group L encounter between England and Ghana in Boston on Tuesday.

The Three Lions began its World Cup sojourn with an attacking 4-2 win over Croatia in Dallas and can seal progress to the round of 32 stage with a win over the Black Stars. 

Ghana, on the other hand, had to labour hard against Panama but a late Caleb Yirenkyi strike ensured the side earned all three points ahead of the tough encounters against England and Croatia coming up. 

#England #Ghana #LIVE #Score #Updates #FIFA #World #Cup #ENG #GHA #Lions #eye #knockout #spot">England vs Ghana LIVE Score Updates, FIFA World Cup 2026: ENG 0 – 0 GHA; Three Lions eye knockout spot Declan Rice during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Group L match between England and Croatia. | Photo Credit: Getty Images Declan Rice during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Group L match between England and Croatia. | Photo Credit: Getty Images elcome to Sportstar’s live coverage from the FIFA World Cup 2026 Group L encounter between England and Ghana in Boston on Tuesday.The Three Lions began its World Cup sojourn with an attacking 4-2 win over Croatia in Dallas and can seal progress to the round of 32 stage with a win over the Black Stars. Ghana, on the other hand, had to labour hard against Panama but a late Caleb Yirenkyi strike ensured the side earned all three points ahead of the tough encounters against England and Croatia coming up.  #England #Ghana #LIVE #Score #Updates #FIFA #World #Cup #ENG #GHA #Lions #eye #knockout #spot

Post Comment