×
Drive Capital’s second act –  how the Columbus venture firm found success after a split | TechCrunch

Drive Capital’s second act –  how the Columbus venture firm found success after a split | TechCrunch

Tech-news ,

The venture capital world has always had a hot-and-cold relationship with the Midwest. Investors rush in during boom times, then retreat to the coasts when markets turn sour. For Columbus, Ohio-based Drive Capital, this cycle of attention and disinterest played out against the backdrop of its own internal upheaval several years ago — a co-founder split that could have ended the firm but may have ultimately strengthened it.

At a minimum, Drive achieved something newsworthy in today’s venture landscape this past May. The firm returned $500 million to investors in a single week, distributing nearly $140 million worth of Root Insurance shares within days of cashing out of Austin-based Thoughtful Automation and another undisclosed company.

It could be seen as a gimmick, sure, but limited partners were presumably pleased. “I’m unaware of any other venture firm having been able to achieve that kind of liquidity recently,” said Chris Olsen, Drive’s co-founder and now sole managing partner, who spoke to TechCrunch from the firm’s offices in Columbus’s Short North neighborhood.

It’s a meaningful turnaround for a firm that faced existential questions just three years ago when Olsen and his co-founder Mark Kvamme — both former Sequoia Capital partners — went their separate ways. The split, which surprised the firm’s investors, saw Kvamme eventually launch the Ohio Fund, a broader investment vehicle focused on the state’s economic development that includes real estate, infrastructure, and manufacturing alongside technology investments.

Drive’s recent success stems from what Olsen calls a deliberately contrarian strategy in an industry preoccupied with “unicorns” and “decacorns” — companies valued at $1 billion and $10 billion, respectively.

“If you were to just read the newspapers or listen to coffee shops on Sand Hill Road, everyone always talks about the $50 billion or $100 billion outcomes,” Olsen said. “But the reality is, while those outcomes do happen, they’re really rare. In the last 20 years, there have only been 12 outcomes in America over $50 billion.”

By contrast, he noted, there have been 127 IPOs at $3 billion or more, plus hundreds of M&A events at that level. “If you’re able to exit companies at $3 billion, then you’re able to do something that happens every single month,” he said.

That rationale underpinned the Thoughtful Automation exit, which Olsen described as “near fund-returning” despite being “below a billion dollars.” The AI healthcare automation company was sold to private equity firm New Mountain Capital, which combined it with two other companies to form Smarter Technologies. Drive owned “multiples” of the typical Silicon Valley ownership stake in the company, said Olsen, who added that Drive’s typical ownership stake is around 30% on average compared to a Valley firm’s 10% — often because it is the sole venture investor across numerous funding rounds.

“We were the only venture firm who invested in that company,” Olsen said of Thoughtful Automation, which was previously backed by New Mountain, the PE firm. “About 20% of the companies in our portfolio today, we are the sole venture firm in those businesses.”

Portfolio Wins and Losses

Drive’s track record includes both big successes and also big stumbles. The firm was an early investor in Duolingo, backing the language-learning platform when it was pre-revenue after Olsen and Kvamme met founder Luis von Ahn at a bar in Pittsburgh, where Duolingo is based. Today, Duolingo trades on NASDAQ with a market cap of nearly $18 billion.

The firm also invested in Vast Data, a data storage platform last valued at $9 billion in late 2023 (and is reportedly fundraising right now), and Drive made money on the recent Root Insurance distribution despite that company’s rocky public market performance since its late 2020 IPO.

But Drive also experienced the spectacular failure of Olive AI, a Columbus-based healthcare automation startup that raised over $900 million and was valued at $4 billion before eventually selling portions of its business in a fire sale.

What sets Drive apart in both cases, Olsen argues, is its focus on companies building outside Silicon Valley’s hyper-competitive ecosystem. Toward that end, the firm now has employees in six cities — Columbus, Austin, Boulder, Chicago, Atlanta, and Toronto — and says it backs founders who would otherwise face a choice between building near their customers or their investors.

It’s Drive’s secret sauce, he suggests. “Early-stage companies that are based outside of Silicon Valley have a higher bar. They have to be a better business to garner a venture investment from a venture firm in Silicon Valley,” Olsen said. “The same thing applies to us with companies in Silicon Valley. For us to invest in a company in Silicon Valley, it has a higher bar.”

It applies a different lens, seemingly. While many VCs chase companies trying to come up with something entirely novel, Drive has a penchant for startups applying tech to traditional industries. Drive has invested in an autonomous welding company, for example, and what Olsen calls “next-generation dental insurance” — sectors that arguably represent America’s $18 trillion economy beyond Silicon Valley’s tech darlings.

Whether that focus, or Drive’s momentum, translates into a big new fund for Drive remains to be seen. The firm is currently managing assets that it raised when Kvamme was still on board, and according to Olsen, it has 30% left to invest of its current fund, a $1 billion vehicle announced in June 2022.

Asked about cash-on-cash returns to date, Olsen said that with $2.2 billion in assets under management across all of Drive’s funds, all are “top quartile funds” with “north of 4x net on our most mature funds” and “continuing to grow from there.”

In the meantime, Drive’s thesis about Columbus as a legitimate tech hub received further validation this week when Palmer Luckey, Peter Thiel, and other tech billionaires announced plans to launch Erebor, a crypto-focused bank headquartered in Columbus.

“When we started Drive in 2012, people thought we were nuts,” Olsen said. “Now you’re seeing literally the people I think of as being the smartest minds in technology — whether it’s Elon Musk or Larry Ellison or Peter Thiel — moving out of Silicon Valley and opening massive presences in different cities.”

Source link
#Drive #Capitals #act #Columbus #venture #firm #success #split #TechCrunch

Tag

Related Posts

Microsoft is in a unique position as AI overtakes the tech industry. It’s one of the world’s largest cloud providers and software-as-a-service companies, while also holding valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic.

Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with $90 billion in revenue and net income of $35.8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported $331.8 billion in revenue with a net income of $133.7 billion for the year.

And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash.

Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer.

Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor.

Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs.

In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth.

When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging.

“The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.”

Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today.

And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings.

“If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.”

The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face, all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit.

Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives.

“Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said.

He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.”

As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said.

Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Microsoft #openly #competing #OpenAI #Anthropic #TechCrunchMicrosoft">Microsoft is openly competing with OpenAI, Anthropic more than ever | TechCrunch Microsoft is in a unique position as AI overtakes the tech industry. It’s one of the world’s largest cloud providers and software-as-a-service companies, while also holding valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic. Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with billion in revenue and net income of .8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported 1.8 billion in revenue with a net income of 3.7 billion for the year. And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash. Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer. Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor. Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs. In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth. When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging. “The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.” Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today. And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings. “If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.” The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face, all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit. Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives. “Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said. He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.” As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said. Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Microsoft #openly #competing #OpenAI #Anthropic #TechCrunchMicrosoft

valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic.

Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with $90 billion in revenue and net income of $35.8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported $331.8 billion in revenue with a net income of $133.7 billion for the year.

And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash.

Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer.

Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor.

Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs.

In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth.

When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging.

“The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.”

Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today.

And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings.

“If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.”

The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face, all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit.

Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives.

“Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said.

He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.”

As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said.

Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Microsoft #openly #competing #OpenAI #Anthropic #TechCrunchMicrosoft">Microsoft is openly competing with OpenAI, Anthropic more than ever | TechCrunch

Microsoft is in a unique position as AI overtakes the tech industry. It’s one of the world’s largest cloud providers and software-as-a-service companies, while also holding valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic.

Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with $90 billion in revenue and net income of $35.8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported $331.8 billion in revenue with a net income of $133.7 billion for the year.

And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash.

Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer.

Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor.

Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs.

In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth.

When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging.

“The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.”

Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today.

And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings.

“If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.”

The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face, all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit.

Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives.

“Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said.

He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.”

As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said.

Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Microsoft #openly #competing #OpenAI #Anthropic #TechCrunchMicrosoft
Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs

Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules.

Platform Comparison at a Glance

PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited For
SkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced traders
CS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectors
Tradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent traders
Swap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users

Which Type of Trader Are You?

Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You? Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading. Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules. Platform Comparison at a Glance PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited ForSkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced tradersCS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectorsTradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent tradersSwap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users Which Type of Trader Are You? Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all. SkinsMonkey SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you. CS.MONEY CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot. Tradeit.gg Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble. Swap.gg Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started. Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal. Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way. Conclusion The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins. #Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all.

SkinsMonkey

SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you.

CS.MONEY

CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot.

Tradeit.gg

Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble.

Swap.gg

Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started.

Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform

Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal.

Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice

Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way.

Conclusion

The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins.

#Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms">Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You? Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading. Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules. Platform Comparison at a Glance PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited ForSkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced tradersCS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectorsTradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent tradersSwap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users Which Type of Trader Are You? Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all. SkinsMonkey SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you. CS.MONEY CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot. Tradeit.gg Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble. Swap.gg Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started. Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal. Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way. Conclusion The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins. #Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules.

Platform Comparison at a Glance

PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited For
SkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced traders
CS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectors
Tradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent traders
Swap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users

Which Type of Trader Are You?

Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You? Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading. Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules. Platform Comparison at a Glance PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited ForSkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced tradersCS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectorsTradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent tradersSwap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users Which Type of Trader Are You? Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all. SkinsMonkey SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you. CS.MONEY CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot. Tradeit.gg Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble. Swap.gg Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started. Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal. Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way. Conclusion The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins. #Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all.

SkinsMonkey

SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you.

CS.MONEY

CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot.

Tradeit.gg

Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble.

Swap.gg

Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started.

Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform

Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal.

Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice

Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way.

Conclusion

The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins.

#Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms">Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You?

Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading.

Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs

Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules.

Platform Comparison at a Glance

PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited For
SkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced traders
CS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectors
Tradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent traders
Swap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users

Which Type of Trader Are You?

Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You? Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading. Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules. Platform Comparison at a Glance PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited ForSkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced tradersCS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectorsTradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent tradersSwap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users Which Type of Trader Are You? Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all. SkinsMonkey SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you. CS.MONEY CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot. Tradeit.gg Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble. Swap.gg Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started. Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal. Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way. Conclusion The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins. #Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all.

SkinsMonkey

SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you.

CS.MONEY

CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot.

Tradeit.gg

Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble.

Swap.gg

Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started.

Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform

Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal.

Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice

Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way.

Conclusion

The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins.

#Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

In the past decade, we’ve had three Venom films, six Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown.

And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms.

“It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip.

Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen?

Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then.

Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so.

Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course.

Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom">Spider-Man’s Producers Still Aren’t Ruling Out a Venom Crossover In the past decade, we’ve had three Venom films, six Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown. And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms. “It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip. Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen? Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then. Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so. Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course. Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. #SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom

Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown.

And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms.

“It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip.

Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen?

Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then.

Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so.

Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course.

Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom">Spider-Man’s Producers Still Aren’t Ruling Out a Venom CrossoverSpider-Man’s Producers Still Aren’t Ruling Out a Venom Crossover In the past decade, we’ve had three Venom films, six Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown. And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms. “It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip. Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen? Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then. Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so. Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course. Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. #SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom

In the past decade, we’ve had three Venom films, six Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown.

And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms.

“It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip.

Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen?

Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then.

Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so.

Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course.

Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom

Post Comment