×
IPL इतिहास में दूसरी बार हुआ ऐसा, हैरान रह गए फैंस, पहली ही गेंद पर निराश होकर लौटे विराट कोहली

IPL इतिहास में दूसरी बार हुआ ऐसा, हैरान रह गए फैंस, पहली ही गेंद पर निराश होकर लौटे विराट कोहली

Sports , , , , , , , , ,

नमन ने 32 गेंदों का सामना करते हुए 5 चौके और 2 छक्कों की मदद से 47 रन बनाए। वहीं, तिलक वर्मा ने 42 गेंदों में 57 रन बनाए। अपनी इस पारी में तिलक ने 3 चौके और 2 छक्के लगाए। विल जैक्स सिर्फ 10 रनों का ही योगदान दे सके, जबकि राज बावा 14 गेंदों में 16 रन बनाकर आउट हुए। कॉर्बिन बॉश 5 और दीपक चाहर एक रन बनाकर नाबाद रहे। आरसीबी की ओर से गेंदबाजी में भुवनेश्वर कुमार का बेहतरीन प्रदर्शन इस मुकाबले में भी जारी रहा। भुवनेश्वर ने 4 ओवर में सिर्फ 23 रन देकर 4 बड़े विकेट निकाले। वहीं, जोश हेजलवुड, रोमारियो शेफर्ड और रसिख सलाम ने एक-एक विकेट अपने नाम किया।

#IPL #इतहस #म #दसर #बर #हआ #ऐस #हरन #रह #गए #फस #पहल #ह #गद #पर #नरश #हकर #लट #वरट #कहल

Tag
Previous post

Katy Perry, Future, LISA, Tyla, Mana And More: The Full 2026 FIFA World Cup Opening Ceremony Lineup

Next post

Could Contact-Tracing Apps Help With the Hantavirus? Not Really<div><p><span class="lead-in-text-callout">After three people</span> died on a cruise ship struck by a <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/hantavirus-cruise-ship-what-you-need-to-know/" class="text link">hantavirus</a>, authorities are actively tracking down <a data-offer-url="https://oceanwide-expeditions.com/blog/press-update-m-v-hondius-7-may-2026-11-30-hrs-cet" class="external-link text link" data-event-click="{"element":"ExternalLink","outgoingURL":"https://oceanwide-expeditions.com/blog/press-update-m-v-hondius-7-may-2026-11-30-hrs-cet"}" href="https://oceanwide-expeditions.com/blog/press-update-m-v-hondius-7-may-2026-11-30-hrs-cet" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">29 people</a> who had left the ship. They’re trying to <a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/05/08/g-s1-121074/hantavirus-contact-tracing" class="text link">trace the spread</a> of the virus. It’s a long, arduous, global process to find and notify people who might be at risk of infection.</p><p class="paywall">Hey, wasn’t there supposed to be an app for that?</p><p class="paywall">Contact-tracing apps were a global effort <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/phones-track-spread-covid19-good-idea/" class="text link">starting in 2020</a> during the <a href="https://www.wired.com/tag/covid-19/" class="text link">Covid-19</a> pandemic. Enabled by phone companies like <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/apple-google-bluetooth-contact-tracing-covid-19/" class="text link">Apple and Google</a>, contact tracing was designed to use Bluetooth connections to detect when people had come in contact with someone who had or would later test positive for Covid and report as much. It didn’t do much to solve the spread of the pandemic, but tracking the virus became more effective at least. The same process wouldn’t go well for the hantavirus problem.</p><p class="paywall">“There is no use of apps for this hantavirus outbreak,” Emily Gurley, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University, wrote in an email response to WIRED. “The number of cases are small, and it’s important to trace all contacts exactly to stop transmission.”</p><p class="paywall">On a smaller scale of infection like this, officials have to start at the source (an infected individual), then go person-by-person, confirming where they went and who they might have come into contact with. Data collected by apps from a broad swath of devices would not be anywhere close to accurate enough to give a good idea of where the virus might have hitchhiked to next.</p><p class="paywall">Contact tracing on a wider scale, like, say, a global pandemic, is less about tracking the individual infections and more about understanding what parts of the population might be affected, giving people the opportunity to self-quarantine after exposure. But that depends on how people choose to respond, and how the technology is utilized by public emergency systems. During the Covid pandemic, contact-tracing via apps tended to work better in more carefully managed European countries, but did not <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/why-contact-tracing-apps-not-slowed-covid-us/" class="text link">slow the spread</a> in the US.</p><p class="paywall">Making devices accessible to that kind of proximity information has also brought all sorts of <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/apple-google-contact-tracing-strengths-weaknesses/" class="text link">concerns about privacy</a>, given that the technology would require always-on access to work properly. Contact tracing also struggled to maintain <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-success-of-contact-tracing-doesnt-just-depend-on-privacy/" class="text link">accuracy</a>, and in some cases could be providing false negatives or positives that don’t help further real information about the spread of the virus.</p><p class="paywall">Especially in the case of something like the Hantavirus, where every person on that cruise ship can theoretically be directly tracked and contacted, it’s better to do that process the hard way.</p><p class="paywall">“During small but highly fatal outbreaks, more precision is required,” Gurley wrote.</p></div>#ContactTracing #Apps #Hantaviruscoronavirus,covid-19,viruses,health,pandemics

Related Posts

Post Comment

Wolfnewss | Powered By SpiceThemes