IvyCraft Review: AI Workspace For Infographics, Video and Podcasts
Most people working with AI today are not using one tool. They are using multiple tools for a single task. A PDF goes into ChatGPT for a summary, key points are copied into Canva for design, and a script moves into ElevenLabs for audio. Similarly, a slide deck gets built in Gamma. Then everything is checked again against the original source because nobody fully trusts the output. That is the modern version of tab overload.
ChatGPT and Claude are strong with text, but visuals still take work. NotebookLM is excellent for source-based summaries and audio overviews, but it does not give users much creative design control. Gamma makes quick slides, but it does not turn research into podcasts, comics, videos, or broader creative assets.
IvyCraft enters that gap. It is not just another chat box, but works more like an integrated AI creation workspace built for people who need to turn source material into finished communication assets.
What Is IvyCraft?
IvyCraft is a source-to-screen AI creation workspace. That means it starts with raw material and helps turn it into polished outputs. The input side is broad. Users can upload PDFs, paste URLs, add video links, work with audio files, or start from text. The output side is where IvyCraft becomes more interesting. It can generate infographics, slides, videos, comics, podcasts, posters, and storybook-style content from the same source base.
The most useful part is source tracing. When IvyCraft generates a claim, users can trace it back to the original material. AI tools are useful, but only when the user can verify where the information came from. IvyCraft is designed around that need, which makes it more practical for research, education, marketing, and business content. In other words, IvyCraft is positioned as a platform that moves beyond simple chat by turning documents, videos, and audio into multiple content formats.
How IvyCraft Was Tested?
For this review, IvyCraft was tested across two weeks of regular use. The input materials included a 20-page academic PDF on climate technology, a 45-minute YouTube investor lecture, and a recorded internal team audio memo. These were chosen on purpose. A good AI workspace should not only handle clean text. It should be able to make sense of dense research, spoken content, and messy internal material.
The outputs tested included one slide deck, one infographic, one short video, one comic strip, and one podcast script. The IvyCraft review focused on three things: whether the outputs stayed coherent, whether the design quality was usable without heavy fixing, and whether the platform reduced hallucination by tying claims back to source content.
Results:
Deep Dive: Core Features
Here are some core features of IvyCraft that you should know about:
The Source Library
The Source Library is where IvyCraft starts to feel less like a chatbot and more like a workspace.
Instead of asking questions in an empty chat window, users first upload or add their source materials. That could be a PDF report, a YouTube lecture, an audio memo, a URL, or a text document. IvyCraft then reads those materials before generating anything.
That matters more than it sounds. In many AI tools, users spend half the time reminding the model what the project is about. IvyCraft keeps the source context available. The workflow feels closer to building from a research folder than chatting with a general model.
For researchers, this is useful because arguments stay closer to the source. For marketers, it means one webinar or white paper can become several content assets. For teachers, a lesson can start from one video or chapter and turn into a visual learning material.
AI Infographics: The Visual Breakthrough
The infographic tool is one of IvyCraft’s strongest features. The basic process is simple. Highlight or select content, then generate an infographic. The question is whether IvyCraft simply dumps bullet points into a decorative template or actually understands the information.
The answer is mixed, but mostly positive. For the climate tech PDF, IvyCraft did more than create a circle of bullets. It grouped related ideas, separated causes from outcomes, and turned timeline-style information into a visual flow. The first version still needed refinement, mostly spacing and wording, but the logic of the layout made sense.
This is where IvyCraft stands apart from text-first AI tools. A summary is useful, but an infographic changes how quickly someone else can understand the material. The platform seems to understand that knowledge work does not end with comprehension. It ends when the idea can be communicated clearly.
Results:
The weaker side needs polishing. Dense source material can lead to crowded visuals. Shorter, cleaner sections produce better infographics. Still, as a first draft, the feature is strong enough to save serious time.
AI Video and Comics
The video and comic tools are built for repurposing. That is where IvyCraft starts becoming valuable for educators, marketers, and internal communication teams.
A dry report can become a short explainer video. A lecture can become a comic strip for students. A webinar can turn into short social content.
The short video output was best when the topic had a clear structure. The investor lecture, for example, converted well into a short “key takeaways” video. The pacing was acceptable, the script was readable, and the visuals followed the main ideas. It was not a replacement for a professional editor. It was, however, a very solid first version.
Result:
The voiceover quality was usable. It sounded clean enough for internal content, learning material, and social snippets. For polished brand campaigns, manual editing would still help.
The comic output was surprisingly effective for education-style content. IvyCraft turned abstract climate tech concepts into a sequence of panels that felt easier to follow than a plain summary.
The main limitation is depth. IvyCraft’s AI video feature is better for short loops, explainers, and social clips than long narrative videos. That is not a failure. It is just where the tool currently fits best.
AI Slides: The Gamma Competitor
Slides are where IvyCraft enters more familiar territory. Gamma, Tome, and similar tools already made prompt-to-deck generation popular.
IvyCraft’s advantage is not that it creates slides. It is that the slides are grounded in the uploaded source material.
When the climate tech PDF was converted into a deck, IvyCraft did a decent job identifying the argument structure. It opened with the problem, moved into market forces, then covered technology categories and investment implications. That is better than simply shuffling facts.
If the goal is a quick startup pitch from a short prompt, Gamma may feel faster. If the goal is a slide deck based on a real document, IvyCraft feels safer.
Source Traceability: The Fact-Check Mode
Source traceability is one of IvyCraft’s most important features.
When a generated output contains a claim, users can trace that claim back to the source. In practice, this reduces the anxiety that comes with AI-generated material. Instead of rereading the entire PDF to verify one point, users can jump back to the original section.
NotebookLM is already strong in source-grounded Q&A. IvyCraft’s key move is applying similar trust mechanics to creative outputs. A slide, infographic, or podcast script is more useful when it can still point back to the original source.
For casual users, this may feel like a nice bonus. For professional users, it is one of the reasons the product is worth taking seriously.
Workflow Comparison: Before Vs. After
The biggest value of IvyCraft becomes obvious when comparing workflows.
Scenario
The Old Way
The IvyCraft Way
Researcher
Read PDF for 2 hours, summarize in Word, build PowerPoint manually
Upload PDF, generate summary, convert key sections into infographic and slides
Teacher
Find YouTube video, write questions, search for images, create worksheet
Paste video URL, generate comic strip, create quiz or lesson asset
Marketing Team
Listen to webinar, transcribe audio, feed notes into ChatGPT, design assets in Canva
Upload audio, extract quotes, generate video clips and visual content
Analyst
Review long report, pull charts manually, build executive summary
Upload source, generate slide deck, trace claims back to source
Internal Team
Turn meeting audio into notes, then rewrite for updates
Upload audio memo, generate summary, podcast script, and short shareable content
This is where IvyCraft’s value becomes clearer. It does not only save time on one task. It reduces handoffs between tools.
That matters because most knowledge work is not difficult at one step. It becomes difficult because the work keeps moving between apps.
Why Choose IvyCraft Over NotebookLM?
NotebookLM is a strong tool. It is especially useful for source-based Q&A and audio summaries. But it has limits.
NotebookLM can help users understand sources, but its creative flexibility is narrower. Its generated images cannot be edited afterward in the same way a design workspace allows. Outside of image and podcast generation, users still rely heavily on prompts and external tools to create visual assets.
IvyCraft does not have that same limitation. It supports a wider range of outputs, including PPTX presentations, infographics, comics, podcasts, posters, videos, and more. That makes it more useful when the goal is not only to understand material but to turn that material into communication.
Source traceability is also comparable in intent. Both platforms take grounding seriously. The difference is that IvyCraft carries that traceability into more content formats.
So the choice is not simply “IvyCraft vs. NotebookLM.” It is more about the job. If the goal is studying and asking questions, NotebookLM works well. If the goal is turning source material into finished creative assets, IvyCraft has the broader workspace.
Head-To-Head Comparison
Feature
IvyCraft
NotebookLM
Gamma
ChatGPT
Core Output
Visual + Audio + Text
Audio + Notes
Slides
Text/Chat
Infographics
Native
No
Limited
Limited
Video/Comics
Yes
No
No
No
Podcasts
Yes
Yes
No
Script only
Slides
Yes
No native deck generation
Yes
Outline only
Source Citation
Strong visual/source tracing
Strong text grounding
Limited
Depends on input
Best For
End-to-end content creation
Study and source Q&A
Quick decks
Brainstorming and writing
IvyCraft’s strongest advantage is range. It combines analysis and creation in a way most competitors do not.
Pros And Cons
Here are some pros and cons that can help you come up with a decision:
Pros
The Glue is Real:IvyCraft brings reading, summarizing, designing, and repurposing into one flow. That is its strongest quality.
Visual IQ is Better than Expected: The infographic and comic tools are not just decorative. They often organize ideas in a way that makes sense.
Source Tracing Builds Trust: Being able to click back to original material reduces the “black box” feeling that comes with many AI tools.
Good for Repurposing: One source can become a deck, podcast, short video, and visual summary.
Cons
Video Still Works Best for Short Content: It is useful for clips and explainers, but not yet a full replacement for long-form video production.
The Workspace Model Takes Adjustment: Users coming from ChatGPT may expect to start typing immediately. IvyCraft works better when sources are uploaded first.
Visual Exports May Need Cleanup: Dense infographics and slides can require manual spacing fixes before final use.
Pricing And Value
IvyCraft’s value depends on how many tools it replaces. A typical content or research workflow may involve Canva Pro, ChatGPT Plus, NotebookLM, a video tool, a podcast tool, and a slide generator. Even if some of those tools are free, the workflow still costs time and attention.
Basic: $7.00/month with 10,000 tokens
Pro: $14.00/month with 20,000 tokens
Max: $70.00/month with 100,000 tokens
Who Is IvyCraft For?
Good Fit
Researchers and Analysts who need to turn dense source material into visual briefs, slides, or summaries.
Educators who want to make lessons more engaging by converting chapters or videos into comics, quizzes, storyboards, or audio material.
Content Marketers who need to repurpose one webinar, report, or podcast into multiple pieces of content.
Consultants who regularly turn research into decks, client summaries, and visual explanations.
Bad Fit
Coders who need advanced code execution, debugging, or notebook-style computation.
Users Who Only Need Simple Chat may find the workspace model more than they need.
FAQ
Is IvyCraft Better Than NotebookLM?
It depends on the use case. NotebookLM is excellent for source Q&A and audio overviews. IvyCraft is stronger when users need multiple output formats, such as slides, infographics, comics, podcasts, posters, and videos. It is better for creation, not just study.
Can IvyCraft Generate AI Podcasts From My PDF?
Yes. IvyCraft can use uploaded source material, such as PDFs, to generate podcast-style scripts or audio content. This is useful for turning long reports or research documents into easier listening formats.
Is The Infographic Export High Resolution?
IvyCraft’s infographic output is usable for presentations, internal reports, teaching material, and social content. Complex visuals may still need light editing, especially when the source material is dense.
Does IvyCraft Hallucinate Facts?
IvyCraft reduces hallucination risk by grounding outputs in uploaded sources and offering traceability. That does not mean users should skip review. It means fact-checking is much easier because claims can be traced back to the original material.
Can I Edit the Slides After AI Generates Them?
Yes. IvyCraft-generated slides can be adjusted after creation. In practice, most decks still benefit from light editing before presentation, especially around wording, spacing, and visual emphasis.
The Verdict
IvyCraft earns a strong 4.5 out of 5. It is not just a chat wrapper. The platform understands something many AI tools still miss: knowledge work does not stop at summarization. Most professionals need to explain, present, teach, publish, or repurpose what they learn. That is where IvyCraft stands out. It connects source understanding with content creation, and it does so across formats that usually require several tools. It still has rough edges. Some features might need improvement, but the direction is right. For anyone tired of copying text between AI tools, design apps, slide generators, and audio tools, IvyCraft feels like a serious step forward. Stop switching tabs. Start crafting. Try IvyCraft for free!
Most people working with AI today are not using one tool. They are using multiple tools for a single task. A PDF goes into ChatGPT for a summary, key points are copied into Canva for design, and a script moves into ElevenLabs for audio. Similarly, a slide deck gets built in Gamma. Then everything is checked again against the original source because nobody fully trusts the output. That is the modern version of tab overload.
ChatGPT and Claude are strong with text, but visuals still take work. NotebookLM is excellent for source-based summaries and audio overviews, but it does not give users much creative design control. Gamma makes quick slides, but it does not turn research into podcasts, comics, videos, or broader creative assets.
IvyCraft enters that gap. It is not just another chat box, but works more like an integrated AI creation workspace built for people who need to turn source material into finished communication assets.
What Is IvyCraft?
IvyCraft is a source-to-screen AI creation workspace. That means it starts with raw material and helps turn it into polished outputs. The input side is broad. Users can upload PDFs, paste URLs, add video links, work with audio files, or start from text. The output side is where IvyCraft becomes more interesting. It can generate infographics, slides, videos, comics, podcasts, posters, and storybook-style content from the same source base.
The most useful part is source tracing. When IvyCraft generates a claim, users can trace it back to the original material. AI tools are useful, but only when the user can verify where the information came from. IvyCraft is designed around that need, which makes it more practical for research, education, marketing, and business content. In other words, IvyCraft is positioned as a platform that moves beyond simple chat by turning documents, videos, and audio into multiple content formats.
How IvyCraft Was Tested?
For this review, IvyCraft was tested across two weeks of regular use. The input materials included a 20-page academic PDF on climate technology, a 45-minute YouTube investor lecture, and a recorded internal team audio memo. These were chosen on purpose. A good AI workspace should not only handle clean text. It should be able to make sense of dense research, spoken content, and messy internal material.
The outputs tested included one slide deck, one infographic, one short video, one comic strip, and one podcast script. The IvyCraft review focused on three things: whether the outputs stayed coherent, whether the design quality was usable without heavy fixing, and whether the platform reduced hallucination by tying claims back to source content.
Results:
Deep Dive: Core Features
Here are some core features of IvyCraft that you should know about:
The Source Library
The Source Library is where IvyCraft starts to feel less like a chatbot and more like a workspace.
Instead of asking questions in an empty chat window, users first upload or add their source materials. That could be a PDF report, a YouTube lecture, an audio memo, a URL, or a text document. IvyCraft then reads those materials before generating anything.
That matters more than it sounds. In many AI tools, users spend half the time reminding the model what the project is about. IvyCraft keeps the source context available. The workflow feels closer to building from a research folder than chatting with a general model.
For researchers, this is useful because arguments stay closer to the source. For marketers, it means one webinar or white paper can become several content assets. For teachers, a lesson can start from one video or chapter and turn into a visual learning material.
AI Infographics: The Visual Breakthrough
The infographic tool is one of IvyCraft’s strongest features. The basic process is simple. Highlight or select content, then generate an infographic. The question is whether IvyCraft simply dumps bullet points into a decorative template or actually understands the information.
The answer is mixed, but mostly positive. For the climate tech PDF, IvyCraft did more than create a circle of bullets. It grouped related ideas, separated causes from outcomes, and turned timeline-style information into a visual flow. The first version still needed refinement, mostly spacing and wording, but the logic of the layout made sense.
This is where IvyCraft stands apart from text-first AI tools. A summary is useful, but an infographic changes how quickly someone else can understand the material. The platform seems to understand that knowledge work does not end with comprehension. It ends when the idea can be communicated clearly.
Results:
The weaker side needs polishing. Dense source material can lead to crowded visuals. Shorter, cleaner sections produce better infographics. Still, as a first draft, the feature is strong enough to save serious time.
AI Video and Comics
The video and comic tools are built for repurposing. That is where IvyCraft starts becoming valuable for educators, marketers, and internal communication teams.
A dry report can become a short explainer video. A lecture can become a comic strip for students. A webinar can turn into short social content.
The short video output was best when the topic had a clear structure. The investor lecture, for example, converted well into a short “key takeaways” video. The pacing was acceptable, the script was readable, and the visuals followed the main ideas. It was not a replacement for a professional editor. It was, however, a very solid first version.
Result:
The voiceover quality was usable. It sounded clean enough for internal content, learning material, and social snippets. For polished brand campaigns, manual editing would still help.
The comic output was surprisingly effective for education-style content. IvyCraft turned abstract climate tech concepts into a sequence of panels that felt easier to follow than a plain summary.
The main limitation is depth. IvyCraft’s AI video feature is better for short loops, explainers, and social clips than long narrative videos. That is not a failure. It is just where the tool currently fits best.
AI Slides: The Gamma Competitor
Slides are where IvyCraft enters more familiar territory. Gamma, Tome, and similar tools already made prompt-to-deck generation popular.
IvyCraft’s advantage is not that it creates slides. It is that the slides are grounded in the uploaded source material.
When the climate tech PDF was converted into a deck, IvyCraft did a decent job identifying the argument structure. It opened with the problem, moved into market forces, then covered technology categories and investment implications. That is better than simply shuffling facts.
If the goal is a quick startup pitch from a short prompt, Gamma may feel faster. If the goal is a slide deck based on a real document, IvyCraft feels safer.
Source Traceability: The Fact-Check Mode
Source traceability is one of IvyCraft’s most important features.
When a generated output contains a claim, users can trace that claim back to the source. In practice, this reduces the anxiety that comes with AI-generated material. Instead of rereading the entire PDF to verify one point, users can jump back to the original section.
NotebookLM is already strong in source-grounded Q&A. IvyCraft’s key move is applying similar trust mechanics to creative outputs. A slide, infographic, or podcast script is more useful when it can still point back to the original source.
For casual users, this may feel like a nice bonus. For professional users, it is one of the reasons the product is worth taking seriously.
Workflow Comparison: Before Vs. After
The biggest value of IvyCraft becomes obvious when comparing workflows.
Scenario
The Old Way
The IvyCraft Way
Researcher
Read PDF for 2 hours, summarize in Word, build PowerPoint manually
Upload PDF, generate summary, convert key sections into infographic and slides
Teacher
Find YouTube video, write questions, search for images, create worksheet
Paste video URL, generate comic strip, create quiz or lesson asset
Marketing Team
Listen to webinar, transcribe audio, feed notes into ChatGPT, design assets in Canva
Upload audio, extract quotes, generate video clips and visual content
Analyst
Review long report, pull charts manually, build executive summary
Upload source, generate slide deck, trace claims back to source
Internal Team
Turn meeting audio into notes, then rewrite for updates
Upload audio memo, generate summary, podcast script, and short shareable content
This is where IvyCraft’s value becomes clearer. It does not only save time on one task. It reduces handoffs between tools.
That matters because most knowledge work is not difficult at one step. It becomes difficult because the work keeps moving between apps.
Why Choose IvyCraft Over NotebookLM?
NotebookLM is a strong tool. It is especially useful for source-based Q&A and audio summaries. But it has limits.
NotebookLM can help users understand sources, but its creative flexibility is narrower. Its generated images cannot be edited afterward in the same way a design workspace allows. Outside of image and podcast generation, users still rely heavily on prompts and external tools to create visual assets.
IvyCraft does not have that same limitation. It supports a wider range of outputs, including PPTX presentations, infographics, comics, podcasts, posters, videos, and more. That makes it more useful when the goal is not only to understand material but to turn that material into communication.
Source traceability is also comparable in intent. Both platforms take grounding seriously. The difference is that IvyCraft carries that traceability into more content formats.
So the choice is not simply “IvyCraft vs. NotebookLM.” It is more about the job. If the goal is studying and asking questions, NotebookLM works well. If the goal is turning source material into finished creative assets, IvyCraft has the broader workspace.
Head-To-Head Comparison
Feature
IvyCraft
NotebookLM
Gamma
ChatGPT
Core Output
Visual + Audio + Text
Audio + Notes
Slides
Text/Chat
Infographics
Native
No
Limited
Limited
Video/Comics
Yes
No
No
No
Podcasts
Yes
Yes
No
Script only
Slides
Yes
No native deck generation
Yes
Outline only
Source Citation
Strong visual/source tracing
Strong text grounding
Limited
Depends on input
Best For
End-to-end content creation
Study and source Q&A
Quick decks
Brainstorming and writing
IvyCraft’s strongest advantage is range. It combines analysis and creation in a way most competitors do not.
Pros And Cons
Here are some pros and cons that can help you come up with a decision:
Pros
The Glue is Real:IvyCraft brings reading, summarizing, designing, and repurposing into one flow. That is its strongest quality.
Visual IQ is Better than Expected: The infographic and comic tools are not just decorative. They often organize ideas in a way that makes sense.
Source Tracing Builds Trust: Being able to click back to original material reduces the “black box” feeling that comes with many AI tools.
Good for Repurposing: One source can become a deck, podcast, short video, and visual summary.
Cons
Video Still Works Best for Short Content: It is useful for clips and explainers, but not yet a full replacement for long-form video production.
The Workspace Model Takes Adjustment: Users coming from ChatGPT may expect to start typing immediately. IvyCraft works better when sources are uploaded first.
Visual Exports May Need Cleanup: Dense infographics and slides can require manual spacing fixes before final use.
Pricing And Value
IvyCraft’s value depends on how many tools it replaces. A typical content or research workflow may involve Canva Pro, ChatGPT Plus, NotebookLM, a video tool, a podcast tool, and a slide generator. Even if some of those tools are free, the workflow still costs time and attention.
Basic: $7.00/month with 10,000 tokens
Pro: $14.00/month with 20,000 tokens
Max: $70.00/month with 100,000 tokens
Who Is IvyCraft For?
Good Fit
Researchers and Analysts who need to turn dense source material into visual briefs, slides, or summaries.
Educators who want to make lessons more engaging by converting chapters or videos into comics, quizzes, storyboards, or audio material.
Content Marketers who need to repurpose one webinar, report, or podcast into multiple pieces of content.
Consultants who regularly turn research into decks, client summaries, and visual explanations.
Bad Fit
Coders who need advanced code execution, debugging, or notebook-style computation.
Users Who Only Need Simple Chat may find the workspace model more than they need.
FAQ
Is IvyCraft Better Than NotebookLM?
It depends on the use case. NotebookLM is excellent for source Q&A and audio overviews. IvyCraft is stronger when users need multiple output formats, such as slides, infographics, comics, podcasts, posters, and videos. It is better for creation, not just study.
Can IvyCraft Generate AI Podcasts From My PDF?
Yes. IvyCraft can use uploaded source material, such as PDFs, to generate podcast-style scripts or audio content. This is useful for turning long reports or research documents into easier listening formats.
Is The Infographic Export High Resolution?
IvyCraft’s infographic output is usable for presentations, internal reports, teaching material, and social content. Complex visuals may still need light editing, especially when the source material is dense.
Does IvyCraft Hallucinate Facts?
IvyCraft reduces hallucination risk by grounding outputs in uploaded sources and offering traceability. That does not mean users should skip review. It means fact-checking is much easier because claims can be traced back to the original material.
Can I Edit the Slides After AI Generates Them?
Yes. IvyCraft-generated slides can be adjusted after creation. In practice, most decks still benefit from light editing before presentation, especially around wording, spacing, and visual emphasis.
The Verdict
IvyCraft earns a strong 4.5 out of 5. It is not just a chat wrapper. The platform understands something many AI tools still miss: knowledge work does not stop at summarization. Most professionals need to explain, present, teach, publish, or repurpose what they learn. That is where IvyCraft stands out. It connects source understanding with content creation, and it does so across formats that usually require several tools. It still has rough edges. Some features might need improvement, but the direction is right. For anyone tired of copying text between AI tools, design apps, slide generators, and audio tools, IvyCraft feels like a serious step forward. Stop switching tabs. Start crafting. Try IvyCraft for free!
Source link
#IvyCraft #Review #Workspace #Infographics #Video #Podcasts
Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.
The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.
“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”
Climate-driven cooling constraints
For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.
To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.
The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.
Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.
“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”
By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.
A troubling feedback loop
While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.
Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.
“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.
Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.
Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.
The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.
“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”
Climate-driven cooling constraints
For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.
To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.
The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.
Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.
“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”
By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.
A troubling feedback loop
While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.
Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.
“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.
Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.
#Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming">The Cheapest Way to Cool Data Centers Won’t Work in a Warmer World
Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.
The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.
“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”
Climate-driven cooling constraints
For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.
To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.
The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.
Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.
“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”
By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.
A troubling feedback loop
While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.
Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.
“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.
Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.
The end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.
The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.
Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”
You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.
Here’s how to watch the final games.
Semifinals
France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on TuesdayJuly 14
England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on WednesdayJuly 15
Third Place Playoff
The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.
Final
The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.
The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.
Where to Stream
If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.
FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).
This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.
Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.
#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer">
The end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.
The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.
Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”
You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.
Here’s how to watch the final games.
Semifinals
France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on TuesdayJuly 14
England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on WednesdayJuly 15
Third Place Playoff
The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.
Final
The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.
The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.
Where to Stream
If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.
FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).
This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.
Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.
#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer">How to Watch the 2026 World Cup Semifinals and Finals
The end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.
The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.
Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”
You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.
Here’s how to watch the final games.
Semifinals
France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on TuesdayJuly 14
England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on WednesdayJuly 15
Third Place Playoff
The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.
Final
The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.
The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.
Where to Stream
If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.
FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).
This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.
Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.
#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer
Luckily, not every back-to-school tech upgrade has to hurt. T-Mobile’s latest offers are helping students and families save on the stuff they’re most likely shopping for, from free Galaxy S26 and iPhone 17 deals to tablets and home internet.
Before you start picking your new phone color, there’s a catch worth knowing about. These T-Mobile deals do come with a few strings attached. Depending on the offer, you may need to add a new line, pick a qualifying plan, or trade in an eligible phone to get the advertised price. Some savings are also delivered through monthly bill credits.
Best phone deal for students
If you were already planning to upgrade your phone before heading back to school, this is one of T-Mobile’s biggest offers. New customers who switch their number can get a Samsung Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 for $0 with qualifying plans, with the discount applied through 24 monthly bill credits.
You’ll need a qualifying T-Mobile plan, and depending on the offer, you may need to switch your number to get the full discount. If you cancel service before the credits finish, you’ll be responsible for the remaining device balance.
Best budget phone deal for students
Metro by T-Mobile is offering the iPhone 16e for $99.99 upfront when you bring your existing number to its $50 per month AutoPay plan. After three months of service, you’ll also get a $100 virtual prepaid Mastercard, effectively covering the phone’s cost.
The iPhone 16e is Apple’s more affordable iPhone option, giving students access to features like Apple Intelligence support, a 48-megapixel Fusion camera, and a familiar iOS experience without jumping up to the price of a flagship model.
Best tablet deal for students
A tablet can be a pretty handy school sidekick, whether you’re downloading textbooks, taking notes, or giving your laptop a break. Right now, T-Mobile is giving the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 5G (128GB) away with a new qualifying tablet line.
Mashable Deals
By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The catch? The $289.99 price is covered through 24 monthly bill credits, so you’ll want to stick with the plan for the full promo period to get the complete discount.
Best home internet deal for students
Moving off campus usually means adding one more thing to your budget: WiFi. T-Mobile 5G Home Internet is down to $35 per month when bundled with a qualifying T-Mobile phone plan, saving you $15 per month.
New customers can also get a free month of service plus up to $200 back via virtual prepaid card, making it a great option for students moving into an apartment or anyone who wants simple setup without a long-term price surprise. Eligible plans come with a five-year price guarantee, so your monthly rate won’t change during that period (excluding certain fees and upgrades).
Luckily, not every back-to-school tech upgrade has to hurt. T-Mobile’s latest offers are helping students and families save on the stuff they’re most likely shopping for, from free Galaxy S26 and iPhone 17 deals to tablets and home internet.
Before you start picking your new phone color, there’s a catch worth knowing about. These T-Mobile deals do come with a few strings attached. Depending on the offer, you may need to add a new line, pick a qualifying plan, or trade in an eligible phone to get the advertised price. Some savings are also delivered through monthly bill credits.
Best phone deal for students
If you were already planning to upgrade your phone before heading back to school, this is one of T-Mobile’s biggest offers. New customers who switch their number can get a Samsung Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 for $0 with qualifying plans, with the discount applied through 24 monthly bill credits.
You’ll need a qualifying T-Mobile plan, and depending on the offer, you may need to switch your number to get the full discount. If you cancel service before the credits finish, you’ll be responsible for the remaining device balance.
Best budget phone deal for students
Metro by T-Mobile is offering the iPhone 16e for $99.99 upfront when you bring your existing number to its $50 per month AutoPay plan. After three months of service, you’ll also get a $100 virtual prepaid Mastercard, effectively covering the phone’s cost.
The iPhone 16e is Apple’s more affordable iPhone option, giving students access to features like Apple Intelligence support, a 48-megapixel Fusion camera, and a familiar iOS experience without jumping up to the price of a flagship model.
Best tablet deal for students
A tablet can be a pretty handy school sidekick, whether you’re downloading textbooks, taking notes, or giving your laptop a break. Right now, T-Mobile is giving the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 5G (128GB) away with a new qualifying tablet line.
Mashable Deals
By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The catch? The $289.99 price is covered through 24 monthly bill credits, so you’ll want to stick with the plan for the full promo period to get the complete discount.
Best home internet deal for students
Moving off campus usually means adding one more thing to your budget: WiFi. T-Mobile 5G Home Internet is down to $35 per month when bundled with a qualifying T-Mobile phone plan, saving you $15 per month.
New customers can also get a free month of service plus up to $200 back via virtual prepaid card, making it a great option for students moving into an apartment or anyone who wants simple setup without a long-term price surprise. Eligible plans come with a five-year price guarantee, so your monthly rate won’t change during that period (excluding certain fees and upgrades).
#TMobile #backtoschool #deals #Free #Galaxy #S26 #iPhone">Best T-Mobile back-to-school deals: Free Galaxy S26, iPhone 17, and more
Back-to-school shopping is already expensive, and this year, tech upgrades aren’t getting any cheaper. Between the ongoing memory crunch (aka RAMageddon), higher hardware costs, and recent Apple price hikes on some products, finding a good deal on the gadgets students need matters more than ever.
Luckily, not every back-to-school tech upgrade has to hurt. T-Mobile’s latest offers are helping students and families save on the stuff they’re most likely shopping for, from free Galaxy S26 and iPhone 17 deals to tablets and home internet.
Before you start picking your new phone color, there’s a catch worth knowing about. These T-Mobile deals do come with a few strings attached. Depending on the offer, you may need to add a new line, pick a qualifying plan, or trade in an eligible phone to get the advertised price. Some savings are also delivered through monthly bill credits.
Best phone deal for students
If you were already planning to upgrade your phone before heading back to school, this is one of T-Mobile’s biggest offers. New customers who switch their number can get a Samsung Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 for $0 with qualifying plans, with the discount applied through 24 monthly bill credits.
You’ll need a qualifying T-Mobile plan, and depending on the offer, you may need to switch your number to get the full discount. If you cancel service before the credits finish, you’ll be responsible for the remaining device balance.
Best budget phone deal for students
Metro by T-Mobile is offering the iPhone 16e for $99.99 upfront when you bring your existing number to its $50 per month AutoPay plan. After three months of service, you’ll also get a $100 virtual prepaid Mastercard, effectively covering the phone’s cost.
The iPhone 16e is Apple’s more affordable iPhone option, giving students access to features like Apple Intelligence support, a 48-megapixel Fusion camera, and a familiar iOS experience without jumping up to the price of a flagship model.
Best tablet deal for students
A tablet can be a pretty handy school sidekick, whether you’re downloading textbooks, taking notes, or giving your laptop a break. Right now, T-Mobile is giving the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 5G (128GB) away with a new qualifying tablet line.
Mashable Deals
By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The catch? The $289.99 price is covered through 24 monthly bill credits, so you’ll want to stick with the plan for the full promo period to get the complete discount.
Best home internet deal for students
Moving off campus usually means adding one more thing to your budget: WiFi. T-Mobile 5G Home Internet is down to $35 per month when bundled with a qualifying T-Mobile phone plan, saving you $15 per month.
New customers can also get a free month of service plus up to $200 back via virtual prepaid card, making it a great option for students moving into an apartment or anyone who wants simple setup without a long-term price surprise. Eligible plans come with a five-year price guarantee, so your monthly rate won’t change during that period (excluding certain fees and upgrades).
Post Comment