×
Phone Updates Used to Be Annoying. The Latest iOS Is Awful

Phone Updates Used to Be Annoying. The Latest iOS Is Awful

I come from a long line of Luddites. My grandmother special-ordered her Toyota Camry with crank windows because she was convinced it was “one less thing that will break.” My father refused to upgrade our six-CD stereo system even though the eject button wouldn’t open and it could only play the first CD he ever put in it. The Traveling Wilburys Vol.1 was the soundtrack to our family dinners for a decade. As for myself, I only switched to a smartphone in 2013, when it would’ve cost about the same amount to repair my flip phone.

Now I am the same as anyone reading this. My phone is my toy and my toil, the first object I touch upon waking, the spackle to my spare minutes, the inanimate partner in our shared lie, which is that it works for me and not the other way around. Mostly, I accept this. But with the latest iOS, released last week, revolt is in the air.

Tech companies are accustomed to a certain amount of kicking and screaming after foisting new interfaces on the public. You can’t please all of the people all of the time, especially when “all of the people” is in the billions. But ask your friends—or Google or Reddit or Bluesky or ChatGPT—about the operating system update, and you will be swept away in a river of anger. “This is like foundationally bad,” author and musician John Darnielle replied on Bluesky to someone who agreed with his original tweet (about the poor photo-cropping function). One Reddit thread was posted under the headline “New iPhone update made me so overwhelmed, I ended up throwing my phone.” The subsequent post does not specify where the phone was thrown or at whom, but I have some suggestions. One wonders at what point a company’s petrification of obsolescence risks becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Ask yourself: Is this good for the phones? Normally, I’d be curious about the hissy-fit metrics inside Silicon Valley, about when public upset gets severe enough to become private data. But right now, I have my own problems.

I downloaded Apple’s new iOS 26.2 last week because I am a trained circus seal who will press any button presented to me. I came home late from a holiday party, agreed to the latest iOS almost by accident, and woke up to a new world. There’s something very A Thief in the Night about any new operating system, but in this case, the complaints, some witnessed, some personally experienced, are intense. Here is a partial list: the slow speed (every action takes twice as long), the animation of text bubbles, the incongruous mix of sensitivity and imperviousness to touch, the swipes to nowhere, the difficulty posting downloaded photos, the fact that almost nothing is where you left it (search fields, files), the unsolicited status sharing regarding dwindling battery life (“24m to 80%”), the lack of visual contrast, the screenshot fussiness, the requirement that users drive up to a mansion on Long Island and whisper “Fidelio” in order to toggle off the “Liquid Glass” function. You have to admit: It’s a little funny to get a transparency feature from a tech company.

Given my history, I tend to assume most technological snafus are my doing. I’ve tried to wind back what aspects of this iOS I can, assuming the veil of frustration will lift eventually. Ideally, I will not have to mentally downgrade this pricy device to a flip-phone. But in the meantime, the widespread nature of other people’s indignation has given me a perverse sense of community.

Take this battery-life business. I work from home, a privileged charging position. Yet I too have noticed my battery leveling threats. The iOS seems self-aware: The lock screen photo now fades by default, in order to save power. You have to do some toggling if you want to gaze at your kids with the instantaneousness to which you are accustomed. Also, like all of Reddit, I do not take kindly to the idea that the solution to my woes is to turn off my device and turn it back on (have you tried looking for your shoes in the closet?). Or that I should check my storage. Ha! I have a year-old phone with enough storage to choke a horse. This is not because I’m directing independent films. It’s because I like my photos and text exchanges where I like my martinis: in my hand. I’m a writer. Two of my favorite things in this world are transcripts and being right, on the spot.

Alas, my trusty research assistant doesn’t feel so trusty right now. The new iOS is like getting a present from the relative who knows you the least. Except worse because your phone knows you quite well. So when it presents you with the touchscreen version of an ill-fitting, bug-ridden, ugly sweater and says, “I saw this and thought of you,” it creates revulsion and frustration. People don’t enjoy forking over data and dollars in exchange for annoyance, in exchange for having to sound, well, like Luddites.

Historically, Luddites were 19th-century textile workers who eschewed new machinery (partially for financial reasons), thus becoming symbolic of impotent resistance to progress. But is this progress? It doesn’t feel like it. Believe me, there’s no glory in identifying as inept. The modern Luddite is just as impatient as the rest of the population, just as concerned with wanting things to work well or, yes, better. Which makes me think twice about my grandmother and her car. I’m pretty sure the woman knew how to press a button. She didn’t special-order crank windows because it was one less learning curve for her, she ordered them because it was one less learning curve for the machine. She would’ve gone with whatever was sure to work. All she wanted was for the fucking windows to open.


Let us know what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor at mail@wired.com.

Source link
#Phone #Updates #Annoying #Latest #iOS #Awful


Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.

The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.

“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

Climate-driven cooling constraints

For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.

The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.

“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”

By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

A troubling feedback loop

While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.

Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.

Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.

#Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming">The Cheapest Way to Cool Data Centers Won’t Work in a Warmer World 
                Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world. The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse. “We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

 Climate-driven cooling constraints For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

 To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios. The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

 Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events. “From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.” By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

 A troubling feedback loop While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves. Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

 “Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write. Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.      #Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming

AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.

The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.

“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

Climate-driven cooling constraints

For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.

The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.

“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”

By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

A troubling feedback loop

While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.

Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.

Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.

#Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming">The Cheapest Way to Cool Data Centers Won’t Work in a Warmer World The Cheapest Way to Cool Data Centers Won’t Work in a Warmer World 
                Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world. The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse. “We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

 Climate-driven cooling constraints For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

 To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios. The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

 Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events. “From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.” By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

 A troubling feedback loop While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves. Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

 “Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write. Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.      #Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming

Like it or not, data centers are now intrinsic to our modern lives, supporting not just the AI boom but healthcare, banking, government services, and other essential sectors. Reliable data center operation depends on effective cooling, which is already a major challenge as many methods require huge inputs of water or energy. To make matters worse, new research suggests that one of our cheapest, most efficient cooling strategies could stop working in a warmer world.

The findings, published Monday in the journal Scientific Reports, show that rising temperatures and humidity levels threaten the viability of direct air free cooling, an energy-efficient, waterless technique that pulls outside air in to cool data center servers. Over the past 45 years, weather conditions that limit direct air cooling have become significantly more common, particularly across the tropics and the southeastern United States, according to the study. As the global temperature continues to rise, this problem is only going to get worse.

“We found that periods of time when temperature and humidity exceed recommended operating thresholds for direct air free cooling are becoming more frequent and lasting longer in many regions,” lead author Christina Karamperidou, a professor of atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, said in a statement. “This will reduce the availability of air free cooling for a growing number of data centers globally.”

Climate-driven cooling constraints

For direct air free cooling, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers recommends keeping the air entering a data center between 64 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit (18 and 27 degrees Celsius), with 10% to 70% relative humidity and a dew point below 59 degrees F (15 degrees C). Air that is hotter and more humid than this won’t cool the servers effectively and could corrode metal components.

To investigate how this cooling method will function in a warmer, wetter world, Karamperidou and her colleagues used a combination of high-resolution hourly weather observations, climate model simulations, and global records of data center locations. With this data, they evaluated how often environmental conditions exceeded recommended operating limits for direct air free cooling over the past 45 years and in future climate scenarios.

The researchers found that the prevalence of weather conditions that limit direct air free cooling has increased significantly in recent decades. Even regions that have only seen modest long-term increases in heat and humidity are experiencing longer daily exceedance events, and the share of data centers exposed to conditions that limit direct air free cooling availability for at least one quarter of the year is rising.

Interestingly, the findings suggest that the hottest, most humid days are intensifying faster than average days, indicating that environmental stress on direct air free cooling systems is become more and more concentrated in rare, highly consequential events.

“From an operational perspective, those worst-day conditions often drive contingency planning, system overrides, redundancy requirements, and reliability decisions,” Karamperidou said. “This suggests that infrastructure planning may need to account not only for average environmental conditions but also for how the most stressful days are changing over time.”

By 2050, the number of hours that exceed temperature and humidity limits for direct air free cooling is protected to increase under high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, according to the researchers. In most regions globally, the average number of hours per day during which this cooling strategy is constrained increases by more than two hours per day, the findings show.

A troubling feedback loop

While this study focuses on how weather can influence data centers, it’s important to remember that data centers can influence local weather too. These facilities dissipate a lot of heat, and research has shown that they can actually create heat islands within a 6-mile radius of themselves.

Karamperidou and her colleagues did not account for this effect, so the direct air free cooling constraints they identified may be conservative, they write in their report. Still, they emphasize that their findings do not mean that this cooling strategy is necessarily infeasible in warm, humid regions. Rather, the study shows that the window of feasibility for direct air free cooling is narrowing due to climate change.

“Alternative strategies—including indirect evaporative cooling, liquid cooling, and hybrid architectures—can partially offset these constraints, albeit with distinct trade-offs in water use, system complexity, and operational design,” the researchers write.

Indeed, as one of the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient cooling strategies becomes increasingly unreliable, data center operators may be forced to turn to more energy- and water-intensive methods. This, in turn, could put added strain on electric grids and water resources that are themselves strained by climate change. Adapting data centers to a warming world without exacerbating the impacts of rising global temperatures will require innovative solutions.

#Cheapest #Cool #Data #Centers #Wont #Work #Warmer #WorldAI,data centers,extreme heat,Global warming

The end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.

The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.

Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”

You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.

Here’s how to watch the final games.

Semifinals

France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on Tuesday July 14

England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on Wednesday July 15

Third Place Playoff

The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.

Final

The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.

The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.

Where to Stream

If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.

FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).

In partnership with Telemundo, Peacock is streaming all of the games in Spanish. You can find all the official broadcasters on the FIFA website.

New Competition

This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.

Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.

#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer">How to Watch the 2026 World Cup Semifinals and FinalsThe end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.Here’s how to watch the final games.SemifinalsFrance vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on Tuesday July 14England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on Wednesday July 15Third Place PlayoffThe two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.FinalThe World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.Where to StreamIf you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for  per month.FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently  per month. Other paid options include Fubo ( per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ( per month).In partnership with Telemundo, Peacock is streaming all of the games in Spanish. You can find all the official broadcasters on the FIFA website.New CompetitionThis World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer

World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.

The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.

Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”

You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.

Here’s how to watch the final games.

Semifinals

France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on Tuesday July 14

England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on Wednesday July 15

Third Place Playoff

The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.

Final

The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.

The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.

Where to Stream

If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.

FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).

In partnership with Telemundo, Peacock is streaming all of the games in Spanish. You can find all the official broadcasters on the FIFA website.

New Competition

This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.

Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.

#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer">How to Watch the 2026 World Cup Semifinals and Finals

The end of the biggest World Cup ever is almost here. Following 100 matches, there are just four teams left and four more games to play.

The tournament has been hosted by three countries: Mexico, Canada, and the US. All of those host countries are now out of the running. The final teams are France, Spain, England, and Argentina. Those teams will play two more semifinal games, another game to determine who gets third place and a final match to end it all.

Going into this year’s World Cup, FIFA anticipated that it would be the most watched tournament in the organization’s history. As the tournament moved into the quarterfinals earlier this month, FIFA noted that more than more than 6.2 million people had attended matches in person, “while millions more follow the action across digital platforms, broadcast, and fan experiences in host cities and around the world.”

You can find the full schedule, which defaults to your local time zone, on the FIFA website.

Here’s how to watch the final games.

Semifinals

France vs. Spain, at Dallas Stadium in Arlington, Texas — 3 pm ET on Tuesday July 14

England vs. Argentina, at Atlanta Stadium — 3 pm ET on Wednesday July 15

Third Place Playoff

The two losing teams of the semifinal matches will face off for the title of third place at 5 pm ET on Saturday, July 18, in the Miami Stadium in Miami, Florida.

Final

The World Cup final game is at 3 pm ET on Sunday, July 19, in the New York/New Jersey Stadium.

The game will also feature the first-ever Super Bowl–style halftime show in World Cup history, with performances from Justin Bieber, Madonna, Shakira, BTS, and Gustavo Dudamel. As the name implies, that will likely land right in the middle of the broadcast, so aim to watch somewhere around 4 pm ET on July 19.

Where to Stream

If you have satellite TV or cable service, you can watch the final kickoffs live on TV via Fox Sports in the US. The games are also available on the FoxOne streaming service for $20 per month.

FIFA has partnered with YouTube as its “preferred partner” for streaming the games. You’ll need YouTube TV’s sports plan, which is currently $55 per month. Other paid options include Fubo ($46 per month) and Hulu’s live sports option ($90 per month).

In partnership with Telemundo, Peacock is streaming all of the games in Spanish. You can find all the official broadcasters on the FIFA website.

New Competition

This World Cup has been huge, competition-wise, as it is the first to include 48 teams in the tournament instead of the 32 for past World Cups. Given the increased number of teams, the structure for how the competition played out was different from past World Cups. Countries were first sorted into groups (labeled with letters A–L) and played out games in the First Stage within those groups.

Winners of those matches went on to duke it out in the stage called the Round of 32, then got whittled down in a Round of 16. After that, the winners moved on to the quarterfinals, which wrapped up last weekend.

#Watch #World #Cup #Semifinals #Finalssports,football,how-to,world cup 2026,soccer

Post Comment