Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work | TechCrunch
ArXiv, a widely used open repository for preprint research, is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers.
Although papers are posted to the site before they are peer-reviewed, arXiv (pronounced “archive”) has become one of the main ways that research circulates in fields like computer science and math, and the site itself has become a source of data on trends in scientific research.
ArXiv has already taken steps to combat a growing number of low-quality, AI-generated papers, for example by requiring first-time posters to get an endorsement from an established author. And after being hosted by Cornell for more than 20 years, the organization is becoming an independent nonprofit, which should allow it to raise more money to address issues like AI slop.
In its latest move, Thomas Dietterich — the chair of arXiv’s computer science section — posted Thursday that “if a submission contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation, this means we can’t trust anything in the paper.”
That incontrovertible evidence could include things like “hallucinated references” and comments to or from the LLM, Dietterich said. If such evidence is found, a paper’s authors will face “a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue.”
Note that this isn’t an outright prohibition on using LLMs, but rather an insistence that, as Dietterich put it, authors take “full responsibility” for the content, “irrespective of how the contents are generated.” So if researchers copy-paste “inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content” directly from an LLM, then they’re still responsible for it.
Dietterich told 404 Media that this will be a “one-strike” rule, but moderators must flag the issue and section chairs must confirm the evidence before imposing the penalty. Authors will also be able to appeal the decision.
Recent peer-reviewed research has found that fabricated citations are on the rise in biomedical research, likely due to LLMs — though to be fair, scientists aren’t the only ones getting caught using citations that were made up by AI.
ArXiv, a widely used open repository for preprint research, is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers.
Although papers are posted to the site before they are peer-reviewed, arXiv (pronounced “archive”) has become one of the main ways that research circulates in fields like computer science and math, and the site itself has become a source of data on trends in scientific research.
ArXiv has already taken steps to combat a growing number of low-quality, AI-generated papers, for example by requiring first-time posters to get an endorsement from an established author. And after being hosted by Cornell for more than 20 years, the organization is becoming an independent nonprofit, which should allow it to raise more money to address issues like AI slop.
In its latest move, Thomas Dietterich — the chair of arXiv’s computer science section — posted Thursday that “if a submission contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation, this means we can’t trust anything in the paper.”
That incontrovertible evidence could include things like “hallucinated references” and comments to or from the LLM, Dietterich said. If such evidence is found, a paper’s authors will face “a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue.”
Note that this isn’t an outright prohibition on using LLMs, but rather an insistence that, as Dietterich put it, authors take “full responsibility” for the content, “irrespective of how the contents are generated.” So if researchers copy-paste “inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content” directly from an LLM, then they’re still responsible for it.
Dietterich told 404 Media that this will be a “one-strike” rule, but moderators must flag the issue and section chairs must confirm the evidence before imposing the penalty. Authors will also be able to appeal the decision.
Recent peer-reviewed research has found that fabricated citations are on the rise in biomedical research, likely due to LLMs — though to be fair, scientists aren’t the only ones getting caught using citations that were made up by AI.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
#Research #repository #ArXiv #ban #authors #year #work #TechCruncharxiv



![New ‘Gundam Wing’ ‘Visual Project’ in the Works
By the time Cartoon Network syndicated the 1995 anime series Mobile Suit Gundam Wing in the United States in the summer of 2000, the Gundam franchise was already hugely popular in Japan. Mobile Suit Gundam Wing, however, was a watershed moment for the franchise in the West, introducing an entire generation of anime fans to Gundam specifically but also the mecha anime genre in general. It’s understandably something of a big deal to a lot of Western anime fans. But despite its massive influence, Gundam Wing had a relatively short run: just 49 episodes and four original video animations. There was a spate of manga adaptations in the ’90s, too, and a serial novel called Frozen Teardrop that ran from 2010 to 2015 in Gundam Ace, but for the most part, Gundam Wing has been content to let its legacy speak for itself. Until now, that is. During the spring 2026 Gundam Conference (via Comic Book), Bandai Namco announced that a new Gundam Wing “visual project” is in the works. When pressed for more details, Bandai Namco Filmworks producer Naohiro Ogata said, “I can’t say what the format is yet, but it is definitely something long.” The announcement on the official Gundam website is similarly light on details, but it’s still hugely exciting. [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tX8NQa1WWic[/embed] Gundam Wing follows five teenage mech pilots sent to Earth to free their home space colonies from the oppression of the United Earth Sphere Alliance. It’s set in an alternate timeline from the original Mobile Suit Gundam series, which first aired in Japan in 1979. Alternate timelines are pretty common in the world of Gundam, so it’s possible that the new project could go that route, though it’d be hard to sell as a Wing series specifically rather than a separate Gundam series.
The new project could also simply pick up where the anime left off or follow the plot of Frozen Teardrop, which was essentially a sequel story. It could even be a prequel, for all we know. With so little information revealed, the possibilities are endless about what this new Gundam Wing could be. That’s not going to stop us from being unreasonably excited about it, though. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. #Gundam #Wing #Visual #Project #WorksGundam,Gundam Wing New ‘Gundam Wing’ ‘Visual Project’ in the Works
By the time Cartoon Network syndicated the 1995 anime series Mobile Suit Gundam Wing in the United States in the summer of 2000, the Gundam franchise was already hugely popular in Japan. Mobile Suit Gundam Wing, however, was a watershed moment for the franchise in the West, introducing an entire generation of anime fans to Gundam specifically but also the mecha anime genre in general. It’s understandably something of a big deal to a lot of Western anime fans. But despite its massive influence, Gundam Wing had a relatively short run: just 49 episodes and four original video animations. There was a spate of manga adaptations in the ’90s, too, and a serial novel called Frozen Teardrop that ran from 2010 to 2015 in Gundam Ace, but for the most part, Gundam Wing has been content to let its legacy speak for itself. Until now, that is. During the spring 2026 Gundam Conference (via Comic Book), Bandai Namco announced that a new Gundam Wing “visual project” is in the works. When pressed for more details, Bandai Namco Filmworks producer Naohiro Ogata said, “I can’t say what the format is yet, but it is definitely something long.” The announcement on the official Gundam website is similarly light on details, but it’s still hugely exciting. [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tX8NQa1WWic[/embed] Gundam Wing follows five teenage mech pilots sent to Earth to free their home space colonies from the oppression of the United Earth Sphere Alliance. It’s set in an alternate timeline from the original Mobile Suit Gundam series, which first aired in Japan in 1979. Alternate timelines are pretty common in the world of Gundam, so it’s possible that the new project could go that route, though it’d be hard to sell as a Wing series specifically rather than a separate Gundam series.
The new project could also simply pick up where the anime left off or follow the plot of Frozen Teardrop, which was essentially a sequel story. It could even be a prequel, for all we know. With so little information revealed, the possibilities are endless about what this new Gundam Wing could be. That’s not going to stop us from being unreasonably excited about it, though. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. #Gundam #Wing #Visual #Project #WorksGundam,Gundam Wing](https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/Mobile-Suit-Gundam-Wing-1280x853.jpg)





-SOURCE-Scott-Gilbertson.jpg)


Post Comment