×
‘The Odyssey’ Puts Hollywood Shine on Jewelry’s Antiquity Moment

‘The Odyssey’ Puts Hollywood Shine on Jewelry’s Antiquity Moment

A jewelry movement simmering across the market is getting a dose of Hollywood red carpet shine courtesy of “The Odyssey.”

Across recent high jewelry collections, trade shows and independent designers, ancient coins, intaglios, archaeological objects and materials with a discernible past have begun to cohabitate with conventional diamonds and precious stones. The interest is less in reproducing historical jewelry — no one is asking clients to dress like Julius Caesar — than in giving contemporary pieces the patina, uniqueness and narrative of objects that appear to have lived another life.

Anne Hathaway at “The Odyssey” New York in Bulgari Serpenti jewels.

Gilbert Flores/Variety

That undercurrent was visible at The Couture Show in Las Vegas last May. Sylva & Cie, for example, incorporated an ancient Roman gaming die into its work, extending designer Sylva Yepremian’s interest in antique stones and historically informed objects. HOWL crafted a collection with Venetian glass paired with Old European-cut diamond accents. Though not archaeological, the designs tapped into a related appetite for inherited craft and materials with ephemera from the past.

In Paris, the interest extended beyond the Greco-Roman world. Van Cleef & Arpels looked to ancient Egypt for its 180-piece “Fascinating Egypt” collection, while Chanel’s “Signes & Symboles” collection explored talismanic motifs and hard stones. The cultural references were distinct, but reflected the broader fascination with antiquity, symbolism and objects that carry historical weight.

Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey” has now given the Greco-Roman side of that movement a global platform with Hollywood’s biggest stars making the rounds with multiple premieres across the globe. Method dressing with clothing establishes the reference but jewels push the narrative over the edge, adding material and provenance.

LONDON, ENGLAND - JULY 06: Zendaya attends the world premiere of

Zendaya attends the world premiere of “The Odyssey” in a Chopard necklace from the Haute Joaillerie collection.

Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images

Zendaya offered the most literal expression at a London photocall, wearing Glenn Spiro earrings incorporating Ziwiye gold plaques dating to the first millennium B.C. in Iran, paired with Barron London old mine-cut diamond rings. At the premiere, a Chopard bib necklace with more than 76 carats of diamonds sat against a sculpted Schiaparelli breastplate — jewelry as armor. In Paris, Fope’s woven gold designs accompanied archival Alexander McQueen for Givenchy couture rooted in Greek mythology.

PARIS, FRANCE - JULY 08: Anne Hathaway attends the

Anne Hathaway attends the “The Odyssey” Paris premiere in Bulgari jewels.

Corbis via Getty Images

Anne Hathaway, a Bulgari ambassador, drew from a Roman lexicon already embedded in the house’s identity. At the Paris premiere, Hathaway paired her brown Louis Vuitton gown with a Bulgari high jewelry gold choker centered on a cabochon sapphire and traced in pavé diamonds. Bulgari did not need to manufacture a mythology for the moment; its archive was already fluent in one.

Lupita Nyong'o at "The Odyssey" New York Premiere held at AMC Lincoln Square on July 14, 2026 in New York, New York.

Lupita Nyong’o at “The Odyssey” New York premiere in Sabyasachi high jewelry 5-strand pearl and Polki diamond choker.

Christopher Polk

Lupita Nyong’o added Sabyasachi pearls, Polki diamonds and a Bengal Tiger ring, while Charlize Theron wore Glenn Spiro diamond rivière earrings and Tiffany & Co. designs. The men largely kept jewelry in a supporting role. For this particular epic, the women carried the history and the carats.

LONDON, ENGLAND - JULY 06: Charlize Theron attends the world premiere of

Charlize Theron attends the world premiere of “The Odyssey” in London in Glenn Spiro diamond rivière earrings.

Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images

The press tour did not create jewelry’s renewed interest in antiquity, but it gave the movement its most cinematic expression yet, bringing ancient objects, old-world techniques and storied house codes out of trade-show vitrines and into Hollywood’s high-wattage glare.

Source link
#Odyssey #Puts #Hollywood #Shine #Jewelrys #Antiquity #Moment

Previous post

Access Denied

Next post

FCC Chairman Wants to Repeal a Key Rule That Would Fundamentally Change Broadcast News<img src="https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/07/GettyImages-2262359639-1280x888.jpg" /><br><div> <p>Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr wants to repeal a rule that has prevented a select handful of broadcasters from taking full control of the media landscape.</p> <p>Back in 2004, Congress instructed the FCC to enact a national ownership cap that would bar any one broadcast station owner from reaching more than 39% of American households. For more than 20 years, the rule has kept mega mergers in the TV broadcasting industry from gobbling up the entire media ecosystem.</p> <p>Now, Carr is proposing to repeal that national ownership cap rule, which, if successful, would mean broadcast TV giants will pretty much have a green light for mergers, even if it meant that one company would gain access to most of the media landscape.</p> <p>Carr expressed his intentions in an op-ed published by the far-right organization <a href="https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/07/15/exclusive-fcc-chairman-brendan-carr-restoring-balance-to-the-broadcast-airwaves/">Breitbart</a>. In the op-ed, he claimed that the cap was once helpful in protecting local news stations, but now it was becoming an obstacle as they compete with national news, large streamers, and social media giants.</p> <p>Instead of a blanket rule, Carr wants to create a new “case-by-case approach.”</p> <p>“Previously, the cap operated as a blanket prohibition on any and all deals that would combine stations in excess of the 39 percent limit—regardless of whether it was a good deal or a bad one for the country,” Carr wrote in the op-ed. “Our new proposal would allow the FCC to approve deals that exceed the 39 percent cap, but only if doing so would promote the public interest.”</p> <p>Major broadcasters have been <a href="https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2026/02/nexstar-sinclair-spend-millions-lobbying-to-rewrite-tv-station-ownership-rules/">lobbying</a> for a change to the rule for quite some time now. One such mega TV broadcasting company that lobbied for the rule change is Nexstar. Earlier this year, the FCC granted Nexstar a waiver for the 39% national ownership cap rule and <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/fcc-greenlights-nexstars-62b-merger-rival-tv-station-owner-tegna-rcna237953">approved</a> its acquisition of rival Tegna. The merger is still currently facing court challenges over <a href="https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2026/07/dc-circuit-shoots-down-challenge-to-nexstar-tegna-merger-00991940">antitrust</a> claims, but if it is finalized, then Nexstar is <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/fcc-greenlights-nexstars-62b-merger-rival-tv-station-owner-tegna-rcna237953">estimated</a> to expand its reach to at least 60% of American households.</p> <p>Sinclair, another Trump-allied major broadcaster that was behind <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo">a particularly infamous PR debacle</a> during Trump’s first administration, is also eyeing a <a href="https://sbgi.net/sinclair-provides-update-on-merger-proposal-discussions-with-the-e-w-scripps-company/">merger</a> and commended the proposed rule change as “<a href="https://sbgi.net/sinclair-commends-modernization-of-antiquated-media-ownership-restrictions/">common sense</a>.” Both companies also famously <a href="https://gizmodo.com/jimmy-kimmel-isnt-coming-back-for-everyone-how-to-see-if-you-can-watch-tonight-2000662811">refused</a> to air Jimmy Kimmel’s show on their channels late last year after the late-night host’s comments about Charlie Kirk drew ire from the Trump administration.</p> <div class="not-prose video-container"><noscript>[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo[/embed]</noscript></div> <p>The FCC will vote on eliminating the rule on August 6th. There are three commissioners, two Republicans and one Democrat. The lone Democratic FCC Commissioner, Anna Gomez, took to X to voice her staunch opposition.</p> <p>“The FCC just announced it will move forward with its unlawful effort to hand control of the public airwaves to billionaire buddies of this administration,” Gomez <a href="https://x.com/AGomezFCC/status/2077430342646997264">wrote</a>. “This will destroy local newsrooms, silence community reporting, and drive-up costs for American families.”</p> <p>Even if the action passes the FCC vote, it’s likely to receive pushback from <a href="https://rollcall.com/2026/07/16/cruz-democrats-push-back-on-fcc-move-to-lift-ownership-cap/">both sides of the aisle</a> in Congress.</p> <p>“Trump’s FCC Chair is trying to illegally rewrite the rules to make it easier for billionaires to line their own pockets while jacking up costs and controlling what Americans watch,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren said in a <a href="https://www.warren.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/warren-statement-on-fcc-voting-to-scrap-ownership-limit-for-tv-station-owners/">statement</a>. “After rubber-stamping the Nexstar-Tegna megamerger, this looks like the Trump administration’s latest attempt to roll out the red carpet for more antitrust disasters.”</p> <p>Critics believe that because the rule was created following Congress’s action, it is up to Congress to determine if it should be retired. But Carr <a href="https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-423139A1.pdf">insists</a> that the FCC has the authority to modify or repeal the rule.</p> </div>#FCC #Chairman #Repeal #Key #Rule #Fundamentally #Change #Broadcast #NewsBrendan carr,broadcast television,FCC

Post Comment