The Democratic Republic of Congo, Namibia and Angola have said they will cooperate on migrant returns.
Source link
#African #countries #agree #migrant #returns #sanctions #threat
Related Posts
had suggested the swap to President Trump and FIFA president Gianni Infantino.
In a phone interview with The Associated Press on Thursday, Zampolli said his “request is not a political request,” but rather meant as a contingency plan in case Iran could not participate in the soccer tournament.
After suggesting to the FT that, with four previous titles, the Italian national team’s appearance in the World Cup would be justified, he told the AP it was his “dream … for the Italian people and the American-Italian people.”
Italian officials pushed back hard at the suggestion, with Sports Minister Andrea Abodi saying Thursday, “first of all, it’s not possible. Secondly, it’s not a good idea.”
Luciano Buonfiglio, the president of the Italian Olympic Committee, which oversees all sports in Italy, also dismissed the idea, saying he “would feel offended,” as “you need to deserve to go to the World Cup.”
CBS/AP
Sports officials in four-time world champion Italy say the country is not interested in replacing Iran at the upcoming 2026 World Cup, following a suggestion of the move by a Trump administration official.
Iran has not withdrawn from the World Cup, and the team is preparing to play in the championship taking place this year in the U.S., Mexico and Canada despite the ongoing war in the Middle East.
FIFA, the global soccer authority behind the World Cup, has insisted that Iran’s group stage games in California and Washington state will go ahead as planned in June.
The Financial Times reported this week that Paolo Zampolli, the U.S. special envoy for global partnerships, had suggested the swap to President Trump and FIFA president Gianni Infantino.
In a phone interview with The Associated Press on Thursday, Zampolli said his “request is not a political request,” but rather meant as a contingency plan in case Iran could not participate in the soccer tournament.
After suggesting to the FT that, with four previous titles, the Italian national team’s appearance in the World Cup would be justified, he told the AP it was his “dream … for the Italian people and the American-Italian people.”
Italian officials pushed back hard at the suggestion, with Sports Minister Andrea Abodi saying Thursday, “first of all, it’s not possible. Secondly, it’s not a good idea.”
Luciano Buonfiglio, the president of the Italian Olympic Committee, which oversees all sports in Italy, also dismissed the idea, saying he “would feel offended,” as “you need to deserve to go to the World Cup.”
CBS/AP
<a href='https://news.sky.com/story/the-most-striking-pictures-of-the-week-13535986' target='_blank'>The most striking pictures of the week</a>#lta #href039httpsnews.sky.comstorythemoststrikingpicturesoftheweek13535986039 #target039_blank039gtThe #striking #pictures #weekltagt">
<a href='https://news.sky.com/story/the-most-striking-pictures-of-the-week-13535986' target='_blank'>The most striking pictures of the week</a>#lta #href039httpsnews.sky.comstorythemoststrikingpicturesoftheweek13535986039 #target039_blank039gtThe #striking #pictures #weekltagt"><a href='https://news.sky.com/story/the-most-striking-pictures-of-the-week-13535986' target='_blank'>The most striking pictures of the week</a>
<a href='https://news.sky.com/story/the-most-striking-pictures-of-the-week-13535986' target='_blank'>The most striking pictures of the week</a>#lta #href039httpsnews.sky.comstorythemoststrikingpicturesoftheweek13535986039 #target039_blank039gtThe #striking #pictures #weekltagt
Philip Rycroft, who was permanent secretary of the Department for Exiting the EU, said the “argument was there to be won” about going back into Europe, adding that a “clear-headed appraisal of what is in the country’s best interests” was needed. However, he said rejoining the bloc could be a “long and windy” road.
“Most economic analysis suggests that we have taken a significant hit to GDP as a result of leaving the single market,” he wrote in the Times. “The precise number, and the impact on our export performance to the EU and beyond, might be subject to debate, but no one can credibly claim that we have marched to the sunny uplands of sustained economic growth as a consequence of Brexit.”
Rycroft said the promises of the Brexit campaign on issues from economics to immigration had not lived up to expectations. “The great promise of a comprehensive trade deal with the USA now seems like an impossible dream,” he said.
“Chill winds don’t just blow through the international trading order. The postwar certainties that underpinned our security as a nation are visibly crumbling. With a hot war on the European mainland perpetrated by a revanchist Russia and an increasingly disengaged America, it is beyond peradventure that we must look to solidarity with our friends and neighbours in Europe to secure our defences.”
He concluded: “The argument is there to be won. It is time to talk about rejoining. It might be time to knock on the EU’s door.”
Rycroft’s comments chime with a growing mood within Labour that the party should be bolder on getting closer to the EU or rejoining in future. A number of cabinet ministers want Keir Starmer to push harder on trying to join a customs union or the single market, which are still red lines for the government as it seeks a stronger post-Brexit relationship with the EU.
In January, the prime minister said the UK should consider “even closer alignment” with the single market, which was preferable to a customs union. “If it’s in our national interest … then we should consider that, we should go that far,” he said.
Concerns were raised at the European parliament on Thursday over EU citizens in the UK and British citizens in Europe post Brexit. MEPs heard about worries over the rights of children born to EU citizens in the UK but who did not know they had to apply for settled status.
They could face charges from the NHS or questions about employability in future, the parliament heard. Michal Meduna, a senior official in the European Commission’s post-withdrawal agreement unit said: “The UK approach has significant consequences for newborn children, resulting in very high healthcare charges.”
The Home Office was also criticised at the European parliament hearing, which it attended, for ending funding for charities assisting vulnerable EU citizens making late applications for settlement.
Settled, one of the charities, will say in a report published next week that it is seeing “hundreds of requests for advice every week”, but it no longer receives funding from the Home Office.
British in Europe, a grassroots coalition that campaigned for the rights of about 1.2 million British people living in the EU in 27 countries, told the parliament it had no funding from the UK. Although it is one of the interlocutors with the European Commission on Brexit, its principals, Fiona Godfrey and Jane Golding, are now working on an unpaid basis.
“We are all here as volunteers,” they said. “We would call on the British government also to fund the work that is needed to be done, for the support of British citizens living in the EU, because that has not been forthcoming.”
The UK government defended its decision to stop funding, with £32m spent since 2019 to help charities. Aliza Dee, the deputy head of justice and home affairs at the EU relations secretariat in the Cabinet Office, told the parliament: “Now that we’re seeing significantly fewer applications being made, and with fewer organisations operating in that space, now is the right moment to to bring an end to that particular tranche of funding. But alternative forms of support do exist in the UK, for example, the settlement scheme resolution centre.”
Britain should start talking about rejoining the EU, according to a former senior civil servant who ran the Brexit department.
Philip Rycroft, who was permanent secretary of the Department for Exiting the EU, said the “argument was there to be won” about going back into Europe, adding that a “clear-headed appraisal of what is in the country’s best interests” was needed. However, he said rejoining the bloc could be a “long and windy” road.
“Most economic analysis suggests that we have taken a significant hit to GDP as a result of leaving the single market,” he wrote in the Times. “The precise number, and the impact on our export performance to the EU and beyond, might be subject to debate, but no one can credibly claim that we have marched to the sunny uplands of sustained economic growth as a consequence of Brexit.”
Rycroft said the promises of the Brexit campaign on issues from economics to immigration had not lived up to expectations. “The great promise of a comprehensive trade deal with the USA now seems like an impossible dream,” he said.
“Chill winds don’t just blow through the international trading order. The postwar certainties that underpinned our security as a nation are visibly crumbling. With a hot war on the European mainland perpetrated by a revanchist Russia and an increasingly disengaged America, it is beyond peradventure that we must look to solidarity with our friends and neighbours in Europe to secure our defences.”
He concluded: “The argument is there to be won. It is time to talk about rejoining. It might be time to knock on the EU’s door.”
Rycroft’s comments chime with a growing mood within Labour that the party should be bolder on getting closer to the EU or rejoining in future. A number of cabinet ministers want Keir Starmer to push harder on trying to join a customs union or the single market, which are still red lines for the government as it seeks a stronger post-Brexit relationship with the EU.
In January, the prime minister said the UK should consider “even closer alignment” with the single market, which was preferable to a customs union. “If it’s in our national interest … then we should consider that, we should go that far,” he said.
Concerns were raised at the European parliament on Thursday over EU citizens in the UK and British citizens in Europe post Brexit. MEPs heard about worries over the rights of children born to EU citizens in the UK but who did not know they had to apply for settled status.
They could face charges from the NHS or questions about employability in future, the parliament heard. Michal Meduna, a senior official in the European Commission’s post-withdrawal agreement unit said: “The UK approach has significant consequences for newborn children, resulting in very high healthcare charges.”
The Home Office was also criticised at the European parliament hearing, which it attended, for ending funding for charities assisting vulnerable EU citizens making late applications for settlement.
Settled, one of the charities, will say in a report published next week that it is seeing “hundreds of requests for advice every week”, but it no longer receives funding from the Home Office.
British in Europe, a grassroots coalition that campaigned for the rights of about 1.2 million British people living in the EU in 27 countries, told the parliament it had no funding from the UK. Although it is one of the interlocutors with the European Commission on Brexit, its principals, Fiona Godfrey and Jane Golding, are now working on an unpaid basis.
“We are all here as volunteers,” they said. “We would call on the British government also to fund the work that is needed to be done, for the support of British citizens living in the EU, because that has not been forthcoming.”
The UK government defended its decision to stop funding, with £32m spent since 2019 to help charities. Aliza Dee, the deputy head of justice and home affairs at the EU relations secretariat in the Cabinet Office, told the parliament: “Now that we’re seeing significantly fewer applications being made, and with fewer organisations operating in that space, now is the right moment to to bring an end to that particular tranche of funding. But alternative forms of support do exist in the UK, for example, the settlement scheme resolution centre.”
Britain should start talking about rejoining the EU, according to a former senior civil servant who ran the Brexit department.
Philip Rycroft, who was permanent secretary of the Department for Exiting the EU, said the “argument was there to be won” about going back into Europe, adding that a “clear-headed appraisal of what is in the country’s best interests” was needed. However, he said rejoining the bloc could be a “long and windy” road.
“Most economic analysis suggests that we have taken a significant hit to GDP as a result of leaving the single market,” he wrote in the Times. “The precise number, and the impact on our export performance to the EU and beyond, might be subject to debate, but no one can credibly claim that we have marched to the sunny uplands of sustained economic growth as a consequence of Brexit.”
Rycroft said the promises of the Brexit campaign on issues from economics to immigration had not lived up to expectations. “The great promise of a comprehensive trade deal with the USA now seems like an impossible dream,” he said.
“Chill winds don’t just blow through the international trading order. The postwar certainties that underpinned our security as a nation are visibly crumbling. With a hot war on the European mainland perpetrated by a revanchist Russia and an increasingly disengaged America, it is beyond peradventure that we must look to solidarity with our friends and neighbours in Europe to secure our defences.”
He concluded: “The argument is there to be won. It is time to talk about rejoining. It might be time to knock on the EU’s door.”
Rycroft’s comments chime with a growing mood within Labour that the party should be bolder on getting closer to the EU or rejoining in future. A number of cabinet ministers want Keir Starmer to push harder on trying to join a customs union or the single market, which are still red lines for the government as it seeks a stronger post-Brexit relationship with the EU.
In January, the prime minister said the UK should consider “even closer alignment” with the single market, which was preferable to a customs union. “If it’s in our national interest … then we should consider that, we should go that far,” he said.
Concerns were raised at the European parliament on Thursday over EU citizens in the UK and British citizens in Europe post Brexit. MEPs heard about worries over the rights of children born to EU citizens in the UK but who did not know they had to apply for settled status.
They could face charges from the NHS or questions about employability in future, the parliament heard. Michal Meduna, a senior official in the European Commission’s post-withdrawal agreement unit said: “The UK approach has significant consequences for newborn children, resulting in very high healthcare charges.”
The Home Office was also criticised at the European parliament hearing, which it attended, for ending funding for charities assisting vulnerable EU citizens making late applications for settlement.
Settled, one of the charities, will say in a report published next week that it is seeing “hundreds of requests for advice every week”, but it no longer receives funding from the Home Office.
British in Europe, a grassroots coalition that campaigned for the rights of about 1.2 million British people living in the EU in 27 countries, told the parliament it had no funding from the UK. Although it is one of the interlocutors with the European Commission on Brexit, its principals, Fiona Godfrey and Jane Golding, are now working on an unpaid basis.
“We are all here as volunteers,” they said. “We would call on the British government also to fund the work that is needed to be done, for the support of British citizens living in the EU, because that has not been forthcoming.”
The UK government defended its decision to stop funding, with £32m spent since 2019 to help charities. Aliza Dee, the deputy head of justice and home affairs at the EU relations secretariat in the Cabinet Office, told the parliament: “Now that we’re seeing significantly fewer applications being made, and with fewer organisations operating in that space, now is the right moment to to bring an end to that particular tranche of funding. But alternative forms of support do exist in the UK, for example, the settlement scheme resolution centre.”
Post Comment