×
Transkriptor Review: Is It the Best Speech-to-Text App? Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls. Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it.  How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor? To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it. Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties. How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text? Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks. I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading. Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English. Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan. Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings? Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting. After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages. What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix? To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at .99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is .99 per month or .33 per month on annual billing (.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files.  Team runs per seat monthly, or per seat on annual billing (0 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work. Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up. ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out forTranskriptor.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audioOtterFree, then .33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute capsSonix per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording Who is Transkriptor Best For? With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries. While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives. For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution. #Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI

Transkriptor Review: Is It the Best Speech-to-Text App?

Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls.

Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it. 

How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor?

To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.

Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.

How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?

Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.

I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.

Transkriptor Review: Is It the Best Speech-to-Text App? Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls. Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it.  How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor? To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it. Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties. How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text? Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks. I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading. Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English. Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan. Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings? Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting. After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages. What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix? To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at .99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is .99 per month or .33 per month on annual billing (.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files.  Team runs per seat monthly, or per seat on annual billing (0 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work. Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up. ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out forTranskriptor.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audioOtterFree, then .33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute capsSonix per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording Who is Transkriptor Best For? With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries. While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives. For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution. #Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI

Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.

Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.

Home page of transkriptor

Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?

Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.

Live meeting section

After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.

What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?

To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at $9.99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is $19.99 per month or $8.33 per month on annual billing ($99.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 

Team runs $30 per seat monthly, or $20 per seat on annual billing ($240 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.

Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.

ToolEntry pricingLanguagesBest atWatch out for
Transkriptor$9.99/mo, free tier available100+Files plus live meeting recordings in one toolAccuracy dips on noisy or accented audio
OtterFree, then $8.33/mo annual6 languagesLive meeting notes and CRM syncFew languages, strict minute caps
Sonix$10 per audio hour, pay as you go50+High accuracy on clean filesNo live meeting recording

Who is Transkriptor Best For?

With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.

While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.

For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #AppAI

Tech-news

Manual transcription takes much time that most people do not have. I usually spend hours every week turning interviews and meetings into text, so I tried Transkriptor through a test to see if it could take notes and save me time. Transkriptor is an AI speech-to-text tool. It converts audio and video files into editable transcripts, and it supports 100+ languages. Over a week, I uploaded my clean and slightly messy recordings, ran them against accented audio, and also linked them to Zoom and Google Meet calls.

Here is how Transkriptor does well, where it goes wrong, and who should use it. 

How Do You Get Started With Transkriptor?

To start with Transkriptor, it does not take more than 1 minute. You can sign up with Google, Microsoft, Apple, or email. Transkriptor leans on a row of recognizable logos, from Pfizer and Tesla to Harvard and Microsoft, to build your trust before using it.

Transkriptor offers a clean, easy-to-navigate dashboard with 5 ways to create a transcript. You can record live audio, upload a file, pull a video from YouTube, join a meeting, and import audio-video files from the cloud. A left rail holds the heavier tools, including text-to-speech, AI content generation, and a calendar for scheduled meetings. The core action is never more than one click; you get transcription without any technical difficulties.

How Accurate is Transkriptor at Converting Speech to Text?

Accuracy is the most important thing, and an honest answer is better than a flawless one. On clean English audio, meaning a single speaker in a quiet room, Transkriptor landed in the high-80s to low-90s percent range in my tests, which matches what independent reviewers report. If you upload a clean 30-minute file, it will take you only a few minutes to check for grammar mistakes, mostly punctuation marks.

I started testing the tool by uploading different audio and video files, and Transkriptor supports a wide range of formats, so I never had to convert the file before uploading.

Audio with background noise and overlapping speakers leads to less accurate transcription. Also, non-native heavy accents reduced accuracy. Transkriptor supports 100+ languages and adds domain-specific vocabulary for medical, legal, and IT terms, which helped with a jargon-heavy recording, though non-English audio was less even than English.

Transkriptor’s editor did the real work. Every line of transcription carries a timestamp and speaker label. You can play back the audio while reading the transcription to ensure everything is up to the point. Additionally, AI chat and summary let you pull a quick recap of the whole conversation. You get richer insights, such as sentiment analysis and speaker talk time, but it is locked behind the Team plan.

Home page of transkriptor

Does Transkriptor Handle Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams Meetings?

Yes, Transkriptor handles Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams meetings with ease. You paste the link to add a recording bot to the live call. Or you can connect your Google or Outlook calendar so Transkriptor auto-joins scheduled meetings. I connected my Google Calendar in 2 clicks and set it to auto-detect the platform and record the meeting.

Live meeting section

After each call, I got a transcript with speaker labels and an auto-generated summary with action items, which is exactly what a remote team wants from a note-taker. The bot-joins-the-call model is the same approach Otter uses, and Transkriptor matches it while supporting far more languages.

What Does Transkriptor Cost, and How Does It Compare to Otter and Sonix?

To get access to all features, you need to buy a Transkriptor subscription. It’s a limited free tier with a small daily allowance that lets you test it. Lite plan starts at $9.99 per month for 5 hours of transcription. Pro is $19.99 per month or $8.33 per month on annual billing ($99.99 a year) and unlocks 2,400 minutes per month with unlimited files. 

Team runs $30 per seat monthly, or $20 per seat on annual billing ($240 a year per seat), adding 3,000 minutes per seat, shared workspaces, call analysis, and custom vocabulary. A custom-priced Business tier is available for larger orgs. Transkriptor is also ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR compliant, which matters for regulated work.

Against the alternative transcription tools, Transkriptor lands in a useful middle ground. Otter is the polished meeting assistant with strong CRM sync, but it transcribes only 6 languages and caps your minutes. Sonix charges per hour and delivers the highest audio accuracy. Here is how the three line up.

Tool Entry pricing Languages Best at Watch out for
Transkriptor $9.99/mo, free tier available 100+ Files plus live meeting recordings in one tool Accuracy dips on noisy or accented audio
Otter Free, then $8.33/mo annual 6 languages Live meeting notes and CRM sync Few languages, strict minute caps
Sonix $10 per audio hour, pay as you go 50+ High accuracy on clean files No live meeting recording

Who is Transkriptor Best For?

With Transkriptor, you get a practical mix of transcription, meeting recording, AI summaries, and multilingual support. During my testing, Transkriptor handled clean audio and video files well and integrated smoothly with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It made it easy to turn speech into readable meeting notes and summaries.

While accuracy can vary with heavy background noise or challenging accents, the overall experience is reliable enough for most everyday transcription needs. The combination of 100+ language support, meeting integrations, and competitive pricing gives it a broader feature set than many alternatives.

For students, journalists, podcasters, and remote teams working across multiple languages, Transkriptor is a capable and cost-effective speech-to-text solution.

Source link
#Transkriptor #Review #SpeechtoText #App

Tag

Related Posts

Roblox has become one of the world’s biggest platforms for user-created games. Now, the company is taking game creation a step further by launching Build, a new AI-powered tool that allows users to create games using natural language prompts. Roblox says the feature will make game development more accessible to everyone.

What Is Roblox Build?

Roblox Now Wants You To Vibe Code Games With over 132 million daily active users, Roblox has become one of the world’s biggest platforms for user-created games. Now, the company is taking game creation a step further by launching Build, a new AI-powered tool that allows users to create games using natural language prompts. Roblox says the feature will make game development more accessible to everyone. What Is Roblox Build? Roblox Build is a new feature that makes game creation easier for everyone. The feature introduces a mobile-first creation tab in the Roblox app, which lets users create games virtually from anywhere as long as they write a brief description of what kind of game they want to create using a short text command. The AI creates a playable template of the game, which creators can then customize after testing. After testing and refining the game, it can be posted to Roblox. One can even move to Roblox Studio when more advanced editing features are required, as both platforms work hand in hand. The Build tool uses AI to do a number of things automatically within the game development process. With the help of Roblox AI and other types of AI technology, Build can create anything from characters and worlds to gameplay, sound effects, and graphics. Roblox says its AI has been trained using gaming-specific data and a large library of 3D models. As a result, it can create game-ready objects and fully playable scenes, helping more users bring their ideas to life. Roblox plans to expand Studio with a new suite of AI tools for creators. One AI agent will automatically test games and find bugs before release. Another will provide easy-to-understand insights about game performance, and a third will recommend ways to boost player retention and monetization. In addition, Roblox is building AI technology that can generate editable 3D scenes from simple text descriptions. For 20 years, Roblox has been on a mission to remove limits on what gaming is – and what it can be.Today, we’re introducing Build – a new way for anyone to create a game on Roblox from their phone. And we’re expanding AI-powered tools for developers of every level.We’re doing…— David Baszucki (@DavidBaszucki) July 16, 2026 Availability, Testing, and Pricing Roblox is launching Build in public alpha starting July 28. The ability to publish games will first reach selected creators in New Zealand, before expanding to additional countries in the coming months. The company says age-verified users aged 9 and older can use Build during the testing phase. However, only games that clear Roblox’s safety checks will be available to age-verified users aged 16 and above. Roblox also plans to keep the basic version free while introducing paid options for power users later. According to Roblox, these tools are part of its vision to let anyone turn a game idea into reality. By making development simpler, the company hopes more creators will build and publish engaging games on the platform. #Roblox #Vibe #Code #GamesRoblox

Roblox Build is a new feature that makes game creation easier for everyone. The feature introduces a mobile-first creation tab in the Roblox app, which lets users create games virtually from anywhere as long as they write a brief description of what kind of game they want to create using a short text command. The AI creates a playable template of the game, which creators can then customize after testing. After testing and refining the game, it can be posted to Roblox. One can even move to Roblox Studio when more advanced editing features are required, as both platforms work hand in hand.

The Build tool uses AI to do a number of things automatically within the game development process. With the help of Roblox AI and other types of AI technology, Build can create anything from characters and worlds to gameplay, sound effects, and graphics. Roblox says its AI has been trained using gaming-specific data and a large library of 3D models. As a result, it can create game-ready objects and fully playable scenes, helping more users bring their ideas to life.

Roblox plans to expand Studio with a new suite of AI tools for creators. One AI agent will automatically test games and find bugs before release. Another will provide easy-to-understand insights about game performance, and a third will recommend ways to boost player retention and monetization. In addition, Roblox is building AI technology that can generate editable 3D scenes from simple text descriptions.

Availability, Testing, and Pricing

Roblox is launching Build in public alpha starting July 28. The ability to publish games will first reach selected creators in New Zealand, before expanding to additional countries in the coming months. The company says age-verified users aged 9 and older can use Build during the testing phase. However, only games that clear Roblox’s safety checks will be available to age-verified users aged 16 and above. Roblox also plans to keep the basic version free while introducing paid options for power users later.

According to Roblox, these tools are part of its vision to let anyone turn a game idea into reality. By making development simpler, the company hopes more creators will build and publish engaging games on the platform.

#Roblox #Vibe #Code #GamesRoblox">Roblox Now Wants You To Vibe Code Games With over 132 million daily active users, Roblox has become one of the world’s biggest platforms for user-created games. Now, the company is taking game creation a step further by launching Build, a new AI-powered tool that allows users to create games using natural language prompts. Roblox says the feature will make game development more accessible to everyone. What Is Roblox Build? Roblox Build is a new feature that makes game creation easier for everyone. The feature introduces a mobile-first creation tab in the Roblox app, which lets users create games virtually from anywhere as long as they write a brief description of what kind of game they want to create using a short text command. The AI creates a playable template of the game, which creators can then customize after testing. After testing and refining the game, it can be posted to Roblox. One can even move to Roblox Studio when more advanced editing features are required, as both platforms work hand in hand. The Build tool uses AI to do a number of things automatically within the game development process. With the help of Roblox AI and other types of AI technology, Build can create anything from characters and worlds to gameplay, sound effects, and graphics. Roblox says its AI has been trained using gaming-specific data and a large library of 3D models. As a result, it can create game-ready objects and fully playable scenes, helping more users bring their ideas to life. Roblox plans to expand Studio with a new suite of AI tools for creators. One AI agent will automatically test games and find bugs before release. Another will provide easy-to-understand insights about game performance, and a third will recommend ways to boost player retention and monetization. In addition, Roblox is building AI technology that can generate editable 3D scenes from simple text descriptions. For 20 years, Roblox has been on a mission to remove limits on what gaming is – and what it can be.Today, we’re introducing Build – a new way for anyone to create a game on Roblox from their phone. And we’re expanding AI-powered tools for developers of every level.We’re doing…— David Baszucki (@DavidBaszucki) July 16, 2026 Availability, Testing, and Pricing Roblox is launching Build in public alpha starting July 28. The ability to publish games will first reach selected creators in New Zealand, before expanding to additional countries in the coming months. The company says age-verified users aged 9 and older can use Build during the testing phase. However, only games that clear Roblox’s safety checks will be available to age-verified users aged 16 and above. Roblox also plans to keep the basic version free while introducing paid options for power users later. According to Roblox, these tools are part of its vision to let anyone turn a game idea into reality. By making development simpler, the company hopes more creators will build and publish engaging games on the platform. #Roblox #Vibe #Code #GamesRoblox

has become one of the world’s biggest platforms for user-created games. Now, the company is taking game creation a step further by launching Build, a new AI-powered tool that allows users to create games using natural language prompts. Roblox says the feature will make game development more accessible to everyone.

What Is Roblox Build?

Roblox Now Wants You To Vibe Code Games With over 132 million daily active users, Roblox has become one of the world’s biggest platforms for user-created games. Now, the company is taking game creation a step further by launching Build, a new AI-powered tool that allows users to create games using natural language prompts. Roblox says the feature will make game development more accessible to everyone. What Is Roblox Build? Roblox Build is a new feature that makes game creation easier for everyone. The feature introduces a mobile-first creation tab in the Roblox app, which lets users create games virtually from anywhere as long as they write a brief description of what kind of game they want to create using a short text command. The AI creates a playable template of the game, which creators can then customize after testing. After testing and refining the game, it can be posted to Roblox. One can even move to Roblox Studio when more advanced editing features are required, as both platforms work hand in hand. The Build tool uses AI to do a number of things automatically within the game development process. With the help of Roblox AI and other types of AI technology, Build can create anything from characters and worlds to gameplay, sound effects, and graphics. Roblox says its AI has been trained using gaming-specific data and a large library of 3D models. As a result, it can create game-ready objects and fully playable scenes, helping more users bring their ideas to life. Roblox plans to expand Studio with a new suite of AI tools for creators. One AI agent will automatically test games and find bugs before release. Another will provide easy-to-understand insights about game performance, and a third will recommend ways to boost player retention and monetization. In addition, Roblox is building AI technology that can generate editable 3D scenes from simple text descriptions. For 20 years, Roblox has been on a mission to remove limits on what gaming is – and what it can be.Today, we’re introducing Build – a new way for anyone to create a game on Roblox from their phone. And we’re expanding AI-powered tools for developers of every level.We’re doing…— David Baszucki (@DavidBaszucki) July 16, 2026 Availability, Testing, and Pricing Roblox is launching Build in public alpha starting July 28. The ability to publish games will first reach selected creators in New Zealand, before expanding to additional countries in the coming months. The company says age-verified users aged 9 and older can use Build during the testing phase. However, only games that clear Roblox’s safety checks will be available to age-verified users aged 16 and above. Roblox also plans to keep the basic version free while introducing paid options for power users later. According to Roblox, these tools are part of its vision to let anyone turn a game idea into reality. By making development simpler, the company hopes more creators will build and publish engaging games on the platform. #Roblox #Vibe #Code #GamesRoblox

Roblox Build is a new feature that makes game creation easier for everyone. The feature introduces a mobile-first creation tab in the Roblox app, which lets users create games virtually from anywhere as long as they write a brief description of what kind of game they want to create using a short text command. The AI creates a playable template of the game, which creators can then customize after testing. After testing and refining the game, it can be posted to Roblox. One can even move to Roblox Studio when more advanced editing features are required, as both platforms work hand in hand.

The Build tool uses AI to do a number of things automatically within the game development process. With the help of Roblox AI and other types of AI technology, Build can create anything from characters and worlds to gameplay, sound effects, and graphics. Roblox says its AI has been trained using gaming-specific data and a large library of 3D models. As a result, it can create game-ready objects and fully playable scenes, helping more users bring their ideas to life.

Roblox plans to expand Studio with a new suite of AI tools for creators. One AI agent will automatically test games and find bugs before release. Another will provide easy-to-understand insights about game performance, and a third will recommend ways to boost player retention and monetization. In addition, Roblox is building AI technology that can generate editable 3D scenes from simple text descriptions.

Availability, Testing, and Pricing

Roblox is launching Build in public alpha starting July 28. The ability to publish games will first reach selected creators in New Zealand, before expanding to additional countries in the coming months. The company says age-verified users aged 9 and older can use Build during the testing phase. However, only games that clear Roblox’s safety checks will be available to age-verified users aged 16 and above. Roblox also plans to keep the basic version free while introducing paid options for power users later.

According to Roblox, these tools are part of its vision to let anyone turn a game idea into reality. By making development simpler, the company hopes more creators will build and publish engaging games on the platform.

#Roblox #Vibe #Code #GamesRoblox">Roblox Now Wants You To Vibe Code Games

With over 132 million daily active users, Roblox has become one of the world’s biggest platforms for user-created games. Now, the company is taking game creation a step further by launching Build, a new AI-powered tool that allows users to create games using natural language prompts. Roblox says the feature will make game development more accessible to everyone.

What Is Roblox Build?

Roblox Now Wants You To Vibe Code Games With over 132 million daily active users, Roblox has become one of the world’s biggest platforms for user-created games. Now, the company is taking game creation a step further by launching Build, a new AI-powered tool that allows users to create games using natural language prompts. Roblox says the feature will make game development more accessible to everyone. What Is Roblox Build? Roblox Build is a new feature that makes game creation easier for everyone. The feature introduces a mobile-first creation tab in the Roblox app, which lets users create games virtually from anywhere as long as they write a brief description of what kind of game they want to create using a short text command. The AI creates a playable template of the game, which creators can then customize after testing. After testing and refining the game, it can be posted to Roblox. One can even move to Roblox Studio when more advanced editing features are required, as both platforms work hand in hand. The Build tool uses AI to do a number of things automatically within the game development process. With the help of Roblox AI and other types of AI technology, Build can create anything from characters and worlds to gameplay, sound effects, and graphics. Roblox says its AI has been trained using gaming-specific data and a large library of 3D models. As a result, it can create game-ready objects and fully playable scenes, helping more users bring their ideas to life. Roblox plans to expand Studio with a new suite of AI tools for creators. One AI agent will automatically test games and find bugs before release. Another will provide easy-to-understand insights about game performance, and a third will recommend ways to boost player retention and monetization. In addition, Roblox is building AI technology that can generate editable 3D scenes from simple text descriptions. For 20 years, Roblox has been on a mission to remove limits on what gaming is – and what it can be.Today, we’re introducing Build – a new way for anyone to create a game on Roblox from their phone. And we’re expanding AI-powered tools for developers of every level.We’re doing…— David Baszucki (@DavidBaszucki) July 16, 2026 Availability, Testing, and Pricing Roblox is launching Build in public alpha starting July 28. The ability to publish games will first reach selected creators in New Zealand, before expanding to additional countries in the coming months. The company says age-verified users aged 9 and older can use Build during the testing phase. However, only games that clear Roblox’s safety checks will be available to age-verified users aged 16 and above. Roblox also plans to keep the basic version free while introducing paid options for power users later. According to Roblox, these tools are part of its vision to let anyone turn a game idea into reality. By making development simpler, the company hopes more creators will build and publish engaging games on the platform. #Roblox #Vibe #Code #GamesRoblox

Roblox Build is a new feature that makes game creation easier for everyone. The feature introduces a mobile-first creation tab in the Roblox app, which lets users create games virtually from anywhere as long as they write a brief description of what kind of game they want to create using a short text command. The AI creates a playable template of the game, which creators can then customize after testing. After testing and refining the game, it can be posted to Roblox. One can even move to Roblox Studio when more advanced editing features are required, as both platforms work hand in hand.

The Build tool uses AI to do a number of things automatically within the game development process. With the help of Roblox AI and other types of AI technology, Build can create anything from characters and worlds to gameplay, sound effects, and graphics. Roblox says its AI has been trained using gaming-specific data and a large library of 3D models. As a result, it can create game-ready objects and fully playable scenes, helping more users bring their ideas to life.

Roblox plans to expand Studio with a new suite of AI tools for creators. One AI agent will automatically test games and find bugs before release. Another will provide easy-to-understand insights about game performance, and a third will recommend ways to boost player retention and monetization. In addition, Roblox is building AI technology that can generate editable 3D scenes from simple text descriptions.

Availability, Testing, and Pricing

Roblox is launching Build in public alpha starting July 28. The ability to publish games will first reach selected creators in New Zealand, before expanding to additional countries in the coming months. The company says age-verified users aged 9 and older can use Build during the testing phase. However, only games that clear Roblox’s safety checks will be available to age-verified users aged 16 and above. Roblox also plans to keep the basic version free while introducing paid options for power users later.

According to Roblox, these tools are part of its vision to let anyone turn a game idea into reality. By making development simpler, the company hopes more creators will build and publish engaging games on the platform.

#Roblox #Vibe #Code #GamesRoblox
Volkswagen-branded e-bikes developed by n+, a bike company that has previously partnered with Mercedes-AMG’s Formula 1 team.

Volkswagen Thinks Your E-Bike Needs a Pair of Smart Glasses Volkswagen is bringing some high-tech car features to a new line of electric bikes, including an optional pair of smart glasses. The German automaker recently unveiled two premium Volkswagen-branded e-bikes developed by n+, a bike company that has previously partnered with Mercedes-AMG’s Formula 1 team. © Volkswagen The companies say the bikes were designed with the same “safety-first philosophy” as a modern passenger vehicle and come packed with tech more commonly found in cars like radar, a rearview camera, blind-spot alerts and turn signals. These e-bikes arrive as automakers and startups are showing growing interest in smaller and cheaper electric vehicles designed for shorter trips. But Volkswagen’s smart bikes are surprisingly loaded with more safety features than many of the alternatives. The bikes’ main feature is the Smart View system, which pairs a rear-facing camera with a screen mounted between the bikes’ handlebars. It also uses radar to provide blind-spot alerts, helping riders to stay aware of approaching traffic without having to take their eyes off the road. © Volkswagen The bikes also feature an LED strip integrated into the frame’s top tube that acts as a high-visibility daytime running light. It glows red when the rider brakes and amber to signal a turn. Beyond those standard features, Volkswagen and n+ are also offering some optional safety gear. The first is a smart helmet that connects to the bike over Bluetooth and uses high-visibility LEDs that synched to the bike’s brake and turn signals. The helmet also includes a built-in accelerometer that can detect a possible crash and automatically send a text message to the rider’s emergency contacts. And finally, riders can grab a pair of smart glasses with a heads-up display that puts navigation directions, blind-spot warnings, and other ride information directly within their field of vision. © Volkswagen “[T]echnologies like these are most commonly known from the automotive world. Seeing them make their way onto an e-bike demonstrates how technologies can evolve and be adapted in meaningful ways,” said Peter Jost, CEO of Volkswagen Accessories, Lifestyle & Licenses, in a press release. The smart e-bikes come in two models. The Sport model is designed with agility in mind, while the Crossover model is built for comfort and includes a rear cargo tray. Both bikes offer pedal assistance up to 25 kilometers per hour (about 15.5 mph) and have a maximum estimated range of 160 kilometers (99 miles). The actual range will vary depending on factors like terrain, wind, tire pressure, and rider weight. Battery extenders are available for both models The Sport model starts at ,999, while the Crossover starts at ,349. The optional smart helmet costs 9, and the smart glasses will set customers back another 9. #Volkswagen #Thinks #EBike #Pair #Smart #Glassese-bikes,smart glasses,Volkswagen
© Volkswagen

The companies say the bikes were designed with the same “safety-first philosophy” as a modern passenger vehicle and come packed with tech more commonly found in cars like radar, a rearview camera, blind-spot alerts and turn signals.

These e-bikes arrive as automakers and startups are showing growing interest in smaller and cheaper electric vehicles designed for shorter trips. But Volkswagen’s smart bikes are surprisingly loaded with more safety features than many of the alternatives.

The bikes’ main feature is the Smart View system, which pairs a rear-facing camera with a screen mounted between the bikes’ handlebars. It also uses radar to provide blind-spot alerts, helping riders to stay aware of approaching traffic without having to take their eyes off the road.

Smart View Volkswagen
© Volkswagen

The bikes also feature an LED strip integrated into the frame’s top tube that acts as a high-visibility daytime running light. It glows red when the rider brakes and amber to signal a turn.

Beyond those standard features, Volkswagen and n+ are also offering some optional safety gear.

The first is a smart helmet that connects to the bike over Bluetooth and uses high-visibility LEDs that synched to the bike’s brake and turn signals. The helmet also includes a built-in accelerometer that can detect a possible crash and automatically send a text message to the rider’s emergency contacts.

And finally, riders can grab a pair of smart glasses with a heads-up display that puts navigation directions, blind-spot warnings, and other ride information directly within their field of vision.

Volkswagen Smart Glasses
© Volkswagen

“[T]echnologies like these are most commonly known from the automotive world. Seeing them make their way onto an e-bike demonstrates how technologies can evolve and be adapted in meaningful ways,” said Peter Jost, CEO of Volkswagen Accessories, Lifestyle & Licenses, in a press release.

The smart e-bikes come in two models. The Sport model is designed with agility in mind, while the Crossover model is built for comfort and includes a rear cargo tray.

Both bikes offer pedal assistance up to 25 kilometers per hour (about 15.5 mph) and have a maximum estimated range of 160 kilometers (99 miles). The actual range will vary depending on factors like terrain, wind, tire pressure, and rider weight. Battery extenders are available for both models

The Sport model starts at $3,999, while the Crossover starts at $4,349. The optional smart helmet costs $399, and the smart glasses will set customers back another $499.

#Volkswagen #Thinks #EBike #Pair #Smart #Glassese-bikes,smart glasses,Volkswagen">Volkswagen Thinks Your E-Bike Needs a Pair of Smart Glasses Volkswagen is bringing some high-tech car features to a new line of electric bikes, including an optional pair of smart glasses. The German automaker recently unveiled two premium Volkswagen-branded e-bikes developed by n+, a bike company that has previously partnered with Mercedes-AMG’s Formula 1 team. © Volkswagen The companies say the bikes were designed with the same “safety-first philosophy” as a modern passenger vehicle and come packed with tech more commonly found in cars like radar, a rearview camera, blind-spot alerts and turn signals. These e-bikes arrive as automakers and startups are showing growing interest in smaller and cheaper electric vehicles designed for shorter trips. But Volkswagen’s smart bikes are surprisingly loaded with more safety features than many of the alternatives. The bikes’ main feature is the Smart View system, which pairs a rear-facing camera with a screen mounted between the bikes’ handlebars. It also uses radar to provide blind-spot alerts, helping riders to stay aware of approaching traffic without having to take their eyes off the road. © Volkswagen The bikes also feature an LED strip integrated into the frame’s top tube that acts as a high-visibility daytime running light. It glows red when the rider brakes and amber to signal a turn. Beyond those standard features, Volkswagen and n+ are also offering some optional safety gear. The first is a smart helmet that connects to the bike over Bluetooth and uses high-visibility LEDs that synched to the bike’s brake and turn signals. The helmet also includes a built-in accelerometer that can detect a possible crash and automatically send a text message to the rider’s emergency contacts. And finally, riders can grab a pair of smart glasses with a heads-up display that puts navigation directions, blind-spot warnings, and other ride information directly within their field of vision. © Volkswagen “[T]echnologies like these are most commonly known from the automotive world. Seeing them make their way onto an e-bike demonstrates how technologies can evolve and be adapted in meaningful ways,” said Peter Jost, CEO of Volkswagen Accessories, Lifestyle & Licenses, in a press release. The smart e-bikes come in two models. The Sport model is designed with agility in mind, while the Crossover model is built for comfort and includes a rear cargo tray. Both bikes offer pedal assistance up to 25 kilometers per hour (about 15.5 mph) and have a maximum estimated range of 160 kilometers (99 miles). The actual range will vary depending on factors like terrain, wind, tire pressure, and rider weight. Battery extenders are available for both models The Sport model starts at ,999, while the Crossover starts at ,349. The optional smart helmet costs 9, and the smart glasses will set customers back another 9. #Volkswagen #Thinks #EBike #Pair #Smart #Glassese-bikes,smart glasses,Volkswagen

developed by n+, a bike company that has previously partnered with Mercedes-AMG’s Formula 1 team.

Volkswagen Thinks Your E-Bike Needs a Pair of Smart Glasses Volkswagen is bringing some high-tech car features to a new line of electric bikes, including an optional pair of smart glasses. The German automaker recently unveiled two premium Volkswagen-branded e-bikes developed by n+, a bike company that has previously partnered with Mercedes-AMG’s Formula 1 team. © Volkswagen The companies say the bikes were designed with the same “safety-first philosophy” as a modern passenger vehicle and come packed with tech more commonly found in cars like radar, a rearview camera, blind-spot alerts and turn signals. These e-bikes arrive as automakers and startups are showing growing interest in smaller and cheaper electric vehicles designed for shorter trips. But Volkswagen’s smart bikes are surprisingly loaded with more safety features than many of the alternatives. The bikes’ main feature is the Smart View system, which pairs a rear-facing camera with a screen mounted between the bikes’ handlebars. It also uses radar to provide blind-spot alerts, helping riders to stay aware of approaching traffic without having to take their eyes off the road. © Volkswagen The bikes also feature an LED strip integrated into the frame’s top tube that acts as a high-visibility daytime running light. It glows red when the rider brakes and amber to signal a turn. Beyond those standard features, Volkswagen and n+ are also offering some optional safety gear. The first is a smart helmet that connects to the bike over Bluetooth and uses high-visibility LEDs that synched to the bike’s brake and turn signals. The helmet also includes a built-in accelerometer that can detect a possible crash and automatically send a text message to the rider’s emergency contacts. And finally, riders can grab a pair of smart glasses with a heads-up display that puts navigation directions, blind-spot warnings, and other ride information directly within their field of vision. © Volkswagen “[T]echnologies like these are most commonly known from the automotive world. Seeing them make their way onto an e-bike demonstrates how technologies can evolve and be adapted in meaningful ways,” said Peter Jost, CEO of Volkswagen Accessories, Lifestyle & Licenses, in a press release. The smart e-bikes come in two models. The Sport model is designed with agility in mind, while the Crossover model is built for comfort and includes a rear cargo tray. Both bikes offer pedal assistance up to 25 kilometers per hour (about 15.5 mph) and have a maximum estimated range of 160 kilometers (99 miles). The actual range will vary depending on factors like terrain, wind, tire pressure, and rider weight. Battery extenders are available for both models The Sport model starts at ,999, while the Crossover starts at ,349. The optional smart helmet costs 9, and the smart glasses will set customers back another 9. #Volkswagen #Thinks #EBike #Pair #Smart #Glassese-bikes,smart glasses,Volkswagen
© Volkswagen

The companies say the bikes were designed with the same “safety-first philosophy” as a modern passenger vehicle and come packed with tech more commonly found in cars like radar, a rearview camera, blind-spot alerts and turn signals.

These e-bikes arrive as automakers and startups are showing growing interest in smaller and cheaper electric vehicles designed for shorter trips. But Volkswagen’s smart bikes are surprisingly loaded with more safety features than many of the alternatives.

The bikes’ main feature is the Smart View system, which pairs a rear-facing camera with a screen mounted between the bikes’ handlebars. It also uses radar to provide blind-spot alerts, helping riders to stay aware of approaching traffic without having to take their eyes off the road.

Smart View Volkswagen
© Volkswagen

The bikes also feature an LED strip integrated into the frame’s top tube that acts as a high-visibility daytime running light. It glows red when the rider brakes and amber to signal a turn.

Beyond those standard features, Volkswagen and n+ are also offering some optional safety gear.

The first is a smart helmet that connects to the bike over Bluetooth and uses high-visibility LEDs that synched to the bike’s brake and turn signals. The helmet also includes a built-in accelerometer that can detect a possible crash and automatically send a text message to the rider’s emergency contacts.

And finally, riders can grab a pair of smart glasses with a heads-up display that puts navigation directions, blind-spot warnings, and other ride information directly within their field of vision.

Volkswagen Smart Glasses
© Volkswagen

“[T]echnologies like these are most commonly known from the automotive world. Seeing them make their way onto an e-bike demonstrates how technologies can evolve and be adapted in meaningful ways,” said Peter Jost, CEO of Volkswagen Accessories, Lifestyle & Licenses, in a press release.

The smart e-bikes come in two models. The Sport model is designed with agility in mind, while the Crossover model is built for comfort and includes a rear cargo tray.

Both bikes offer pedal assistance up to 25 kilometers per hour (about 15.5 mph) and have a maximum estimated range of 160 kilometers (99 miles). The actual range will vary depending on factors like terrain, wind, tire pressure, and rider weight. Battery extenders are available for both models

The Sport model starts at $3,999, while the Crossover starts at $4,349. The optional smart helmet costs $399, and the smart glasses will set customers back another $499.

#Volkswagen #Thinks #EBike #Pair #Smart #Glassese-bikes,smart glasses,Volkswagen">Volkswagen Thinks Your E-Bike Needs a Pair of Smart Glasses

Volkswagen is bringing some high-tech car features to a new line of electric bikes, including an optional pair of smart glasses.

The German automaker recently unveiled two premium Volkswagen-branded e-bikes developed by n+, a bike company that has previously partnered with Mercedes-AMG’s Formula 1 team.

Volkswagen Thinks Your E-Bike Needs a Pair of Smart Glasses Volkswagen is bringing some high-tech car features to a new line of electric bikes, including an optional pair of smart glasses. The German automaker recently unveiled two premium Volkswagen-branded e-bikes developed by n+, a bike company that has previously partnered with Mercedes-AMG’s Formula 1 team. © Volkswagen The companies say the bikes were designed with the same “safety-first philosophy” as a modern passenger vehicle and come packed with tech more commonly found in cars like radar, a rearview camera, blind-spot alerts and turn signals. These e-bikes arrive as automakers and startups are showing growing interest in smaller and cheaper electric vehicles designed for shorter trips. But Volkswagen’s smart bikes are surprisingly loaded with more safety features than many of the alternatives. The bikes’ main feature is the Smart View system, which pairs a rear-facing camera with a screen mounted between the bikes’ handlebars. It also uses radar to provide blind-spot alerts, helping riders to stay aware of approaching traffic without having to take their eyes off the road. © Volkswagen The bikes also feature an LED strip integrated into the frame’s top tube that acts as a high-visibility daytime running light. It glows red when the rider brakes and amber to signal a turn. Beyond those standard features, Volkswagen and n+ are also offering some optional safety gear. The first is a smart helmet that connects to the bike over Bluetooth and uses high-visibility LEDs that synched to the bike’s brake and turn signals. The helmet also includes a built-in accelerometer that can detect a possible crash and automatically send a text message to the rider’s emergency contacts. And finally, riders can grab a pair of smart glasses with a heads-up display that puts navigation directions, blind-spot warnings, and other ride information directly within their field of vision. © Volkswagen “[T]echnologies like these are most commonly known from the automotive world. Seeing them make their way onto an e-bike demonstrates how technologies can evolve and be adapted in meaningful ways,” said Peter Jost, CEO of Volkswagen Accessories, Lifestyle & Licenses, in a press release. The smart e-bikes come in two models. The Sport model is designed with agility in mind, while the Crossover model is built for comfort and includes a rear cargo tray. Both bikes offer pedal assistance up to 25 kilometers per hour (about 15.5 mph) and have a maximum estimated range of 160 kilometers (99 miles). The actual range will vary depending on factors like terrain, wind, tire pressure, and rider weight. Battery extenders are available for both models The Sport model starts at ,999, while the Crossover starts at ,349. The optional smart helmet costs 9, and the smart glasses will set customers back another 9. #Volkswagen #Thinks #EBike #Pair #Smart #Glassese-bikes,smart glasses,Volkswagen
© Volkswagen

The companies say the bikes were designed with the same “safety-first philosophy” as a modern passenger vehicle and come packed with tech more commonly found in cars like radar, a rearview camera, blind-spot alerts and turn signals.

These e-bikes arrive as automakers and startups are showing growing interest in smaller and cheaper electric vehicles designed for shorter trips. But Volkswagen’s smart bikes are surprisingly loaded with more safety features than many of the alternatives.

The bikes’ main feature is the Smart View system, which pairs a rear-facing camera with a screen mounted between the bikes’ handlebars. It also uses radar to provide blind-spot alerts, helping riders to stay aware of approaching traffic without having to take their eyes off the road.

Smart View Volkswagen
© Volkswagen

The bikes also feature an LED strip integrated into the frame’s top tube that acts as a high-visibility daytime running light. It glows red when the rider brakes and amber to signal a turn.

Beyond those standard features, Volkswagen and n+ are also offering some optional safety gear.

The first is a smart helmet that connects to the bike over Bluetooth and uses high-visibility LEDs that synched to the bike’s brake and turn signals. The helmet also includes a built-in accelerometer that can detect a possible crash and automatically send a text message to the rider’s emergency contacts.

And finally, riders can grab a pair of smart glasses with a heads-up display that puts navigation directions, blind-spot warnings, and other ride information directly within their field of vision.

Volkswagen Smart Glasses
© Volkswagen

“[T]echnologies like these are most commonly known from the automotive world. Seeing them make their way onto an e-bike demonstrates how technologies can evolve and be adapted in meaningful ways,” said Peter Jost, CEO of Volkswagen Accessories, Lifestyle & Licenses, in a press release.

The smart e-bikes come in two models. The Sport model is designed with agility in mind, while the Crossover model is built for comfort and includes a rear cargo tray.

Both bikes offer pedal assistance up to 25 kilometers per hour (about 15.5 mph) and have a maximum estimated range of 160 kilometers (99 miles). The actual range will vary depending on factors like terrain, wind, tire pressure, and rider weight. Battery extenders are available for both models

The Sport model starts at $3,999, while the Crossover starts at $4,349. The optional smart helmet costs $399, and the smart glasses will set customers back another $499.

#Volkswagen #Thinks #EBike #Pair #Smart #Glassese-bikes,smart glasses,Volkswagen
The lettuce supplier at the center of the turbo diarrhea outbreak has spent millions of dollars to sway sentiment around food regulation and elect Donald Trump and other MAGA Republicans, according to public filings.

Taylor Farms donated more than $2 million to conservative political groups in 2025, according to Federal Election Commission filings. That includes a $1 million donation to MAGA Inc., the Trump-centric super PAC, and $1.1 million to other super PACs dedicated to electing Republicans.

From 2020 through the end of 2024, the company donated more than $1.6 million to conservative PACs, including a total of $850,000 to AFP Action, an anti-regulation super PAC with ties to the Koch network.

Bruce Taylor, the chairman and CEO of Taylor Farms, is also a longtime donor to Republican causes. Since 2020, Taylor has personally donated more than $900,000 to Republican PACs and candidates, including contributions to Texas senator John Cornyn and Tennessee senator Marsha Blackburn.

Like many corporate giants, Taylor Farms has also spent big on lobbying related to industry regulation. In early 2025, it hired lobbyists at the firm Sidley Austin to advocate on behalf of the company on “regulation of food safety,” according to disclosure documents. Since then, the company has spent $810,000 on its lobbying efforts.

Marion Nestle, a food policy expert, said that Taylor Farms’ donations are part of a wider problem in the American food industry: that multibillion-dollar companies use their financial resources to push policies that would reduce food safety regulation and accountability when outbreaks occur.

“The FDA has regulations in place for what food producers are supposed to be doing, but nobody wants to do it—because it’s expensive and difficult,” Nestle told WIRED.

In a post on X, the US Department of Health & Human Services emphasized that Taylor Farms’ political donations did not influence the Trump administration’s response to the cyclospora outbreak.

“This is how the FAKE NEWS works: imply collusion, ignore the facts,” the HHS account posted on Monday. “Nothing influences our decisions except science and the safety of the American people.”

Taylor Farms has apparently taken issue with the CDC’s and FDA’s handling of the investigation into the current cyclospora outbreak, which has sickened thousands of people across multiple states. The company recently claimed that the FDA “apologized” after announcing a false-positive test of a sample of Taylor Farms’ lettuce; the FDA told reporters that no, actually, an official apology never happened. (The company did not respond to WIRED’s requests for comment.)

Prior to the false positive and the non-apology, Taylor Farms executives met with White House and FDA officials to discuss what a spokesperson for the company called “shortfalls” in the government agencies’ response. The New York Times reported that the meeting followed Taylor Farms’ recent hire of Trent Morse, the former deputy director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, who left the Trump administration to start a government relations firm in September.

The recent diarrhea debacle is not the first time that Taylor Farms, which brings in roughly $7 billion in annual revenue, has drawn the focus of federal regulators.

In 2013, the FDA named Taylor Farms as a source of a cyclospora outbreak that sickened hundreds. In 2015, the company voluntarily recalled multiple products containing celery because they may have been contaminated with E. coli. And in 2024, the company recalled certain yellow onions as part of an E. coli outbreak linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounders. Following the outbreak, CBS News reported that FDA inspectors found dozens of violations at the Colorado Taylor Farms facility linked to the Quarter Pounder outbreak, including minimal handwashing and dirty equipment.

Since 2025, the FDA has inspected 18 American plants affiliated with Taylor Farms. Three resulted in “voluntary action indicated,” which means that while violations were found, they weren’t severe enough to warrant mandatory enforcement.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited at least 21 violations in Taylor Farms facilities across the US since the start of 2025. In one particularly gruesome case, the Department of Labor fined a New Jersey facility $1.1 million due to violations. The May 2025 inspection came after an employee died after sustaining injuries cleaning an industrial blancher at the facility.

#Taylor #Farms #Spent #Big #MAGA #AntiRegulatory #Lobbying #Diarrhea #Outbreakfda,donald trump,outbreak,food,agriculture,regulation,republicans,diarrhea">Taylor Farms Spent Big on MAGA and Anti-Regulatory Lobbying Before Diarrhea OutbreakThe lettuce supplier at the center of the turbo diarrhea outbreak has spent millions of dollars to sway sentiment around food regulation and elect Donald Trump and other MAGA Republicans, according to public filings.Taylor Farms donated more than million to conservative political groups in 2025, according to Federal Election Commission filings. That includes a million donation to MAGA Inc., the Trump-centric super PAC, and .1 million to other super PACs dedicated to electing Republicans.From 2020 through the end of 2024, the company donated more than .6 million to conservative PACs, including a total of 0,000 to AFP Action, an anti-regulation super PAC with ties to the Koch network.Bruce Taylor, the chairman and CEO of Taylor Farms, is also a longtime donor to Republican causes. Since 2020, Taylor has personally donated more than 0,000 to Republican PACs and candidates, including contributions to Texas senator John Cornyn and Tennessee senator Marsha Blackburn.Like many corporate giants, Taylor Farms has also spent big on lobbying related to industry regulation. In early 2025, it hired lobbyists at the firm Sidley Austin to advocate on behalf of the company on “regulation of food safety,” according to disclosure documents. Since then, the company has spent 0,000 on its lobbying efforts.Marion Nestle, a food policy expert, said that Taylor Farms’ donations are part of a wider problem in the American food industry: that multibillion-dollar companies use their financial resources to push policies that would reduce food safety regulation and accountability when outbreaks occur.“The FDA has regulations in place for what food producers are supposed to be doing, but nobody wants to do it—because it’s expensive and difficult,” Nestle told WIRED.In a post on X, the US Department of Health & Human Services emphasized that Taylor Farms’ political donations did not influence the Trump administration’s response to the cyclospora outbreak.“This is how the FAKE NEWS works: imply collusion, ignore the facts,” the HHS account posted on Monday. “Nothing influences our decisions except science and the safety of the American people.”Taylor Farms has apparently taken issue with the CDC’s and FDA’s handling of the investigation into the current cyclospora outbreak, which has sickened thousands of people across multiple states. The company recently claimed that the FDA “apologized” after announcing a false-positive test of a sample of Taylor Farms’ lettuce; the FDA told reporters that no, actually, an official apology never happened. (The company did not respond to WIRED’s requests for comment.)Prior to the false positive and the non-apology, Taylor Farms executives met with White House and FDA officials to discuss what a spokesperson for the company called “shortfalls” in the government agencies’ response. The New York Times reported that the meeting followed Taylor Farms’ recent hire of Trent Morse, the former deputy director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, who left the Trump administration to start a government relations firm in September.The recent diarrhea debacle is not the first time that Taylor Farms, which brings in roughly billion in annual revenue, has drawn the focus of federal regulators.In 2013, the FDA named Taylor Farms as a source of a cyclospora outbreak that sickened hundreds. In 2015, the company voluntarily recalled multiple products containing celery because they may have been contaminated with E. coli. And in 2024, the company recalled certain yellow onions as part of an E. coli outbreak linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounders. Following the outbreak, CBS News reported that FDA inspectors found dozens of violations at the Colorado Taylor Farms facility linked to the Quarter Pounder outbreak, including minimal handwashing and dirty equipment.Since 2025, the FDA has inspected 18 American plants affiliated with Taylor Farms. Three resulted in “voluntary action indicated,” which means that while violations were found, they weren’t severe enough to warrant mandatory enforcement.The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited at least 21 violations in Taylor Farms facilities across the US since the start of 2025. In one particularly gruesome case, the Department of Labor fined a New Jersey facility .1 million due to violations. The May 2025 inspection came after an employee died after sustaining injuries cleaning an industrial blancher at the facility.#Taylor #Farms #Spent #Big #MAGA #AntiRegulatory #Lobbying #Diarrhea #Outbreakfda,donald trump,outbreak,food,agriculture,regulation,republicans,diarrhea

turbo diarrhea outbreak has spent millions of dollars to sway sentiment around food regulation and elect Donald Trump and other MAGA Republicans, according to public filings.

Taylor Farms donated more than $2 million to conservative political groups in 2025, according to Federal Election Commission filings. That includes a $1 million donation to MAGA Inc., the Trump-centric super PAC, and $1.1 million to other super PACs dedicated to electing Republicans.

From 2020 through the end of 2024, the company donated more than $1.6 million to conservative PACs, including a total of $850,000 to AFP Action, an anti-regulation super PAC with ties to the Koch network.

Bruce Taylor, the chairman and CEO of Taylor Farms, is also a longtime donor to Republican causes. Since 2020, Taylor has personally donated more than $900,000 to Republican PACs and candidates, including contributions to Texas senator John Cornyn and Tennessee senator Marsha Blackburn.

Like many corporate giants, Taylor Farms has also spent big on lobbying related to industry regulation. In early 2025, it hired lobbyists at the firm Sidley Austin to advocate on behalf of the company on “regulation of food safety,” according to disclosure documents. Since then, the company has spent $810,000 on its lobbying efforts.

Marion Nestle, a food policy expert, said that Taylor Farms’ donations are part of a wider problem in the American food industry: that multibillion-dollar companies use their financial resources to push policies that would reduce food safety regulation and accountability when outbreaks occur.

“The FDA has regulations in place for what food producers are supposed to be doing, but nobody wants to do it—because it’s expensive and difficult,” Nestle told WIRED.

In a post on X, the US Department of Health & Human Services emphasized that Taylor Farms’ political donations did not influence the Trump administration’s response to the cyclospora outbreak.

“This is how the FAKE NEWS works: imply collusion, ignore the facts,” the HHS account posted on Monday. “Nothing influences our decisions except science and the safety of the American people.”

Taylor Farms has apparently taken issue with the CDC’s and FDA’s handling of the investigation into the current cyclospora outbreak, which has sickened thousands of people across multiple states. The company recently claimed that the FDA “apologized” after announcing a false-positive test of a sample of Taylor Farms’ lettuce; the FDA told reporters that no, actually, an official apology never happened. (The company did not respond to WIRED’s requests for comment.)

Prior to the false positive and the non-apology, Taylor Farms executives met with White House and FDA officials to discuss what a spokesperson for the company called “shortfalls” in the government agencies’ response. The New York Times reported that the meeting followed Taylor Farms’ recent hire of Trent Morse, the former deputy director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, who left the Trump administration to start a government relations firm in September.

The recent diarrhea debacle is not the first time that Taylor Farms, which brings in roughly $7 billion in annual revenue, has drawn the focus of federal regulators.

In 2013, the FDA named Taylor Farms as a source of a cyclospora outbreak that sickened hundreds. In 2015, the company voluntarily recalled multiple products containing celery because they may have been contaminated with E. coli. And in 2024, the company recalled certain yellow onions as part of an E. coli outbreak linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounders. Following the outbreak, CBS News reported that FDA inspectors found dozens of violations at the Colorado Taylor Farms facility linked to the Quarter Pounder outbreak, including minimal handwashing and dirty equipment.

Since 2025, the FDA has inspected 18 American plants affiliated with Taylor Farms. Three resulted in “voluntary action indicated,” which means that while violations were found, they weren’t severe enough to warrant mandatory enforcement.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited at least 21 violations in Taylor Farms facilities across the US since the start of 2025. In one particularly gruesome case, the Department of Labor fined a New Jersey facility $1.1 million due to violations. The May 2025 inspection came after an employee died after sustaining injuries cleaning an industrial blancher at the facility.

#Taylor #Farms #Spent #Big #MAGA #AntiRegulatory #Lobbying #Diarrhea #Outbreakfda,donald trump,outbreak,food,agriculture,regulation,republicans,diarrhea">Taylor Farms Spent Big on MAGA and Anti-Regulatory Lobbying Before Diarrhea Outbreak

The lettuce supplier at the center of the turbo diarrhea outbreak has spent millions of dollars to sway sentiment around food regulation and elect Donald Trump and other MAGA Republicans, according to public filings.

Taylor Farms donated more than $2 million to conservative political groups in 2025, according to Federal Election Commission filings. That includes a $1 million donation to MAGA Inc., the Trump-centric super PAC, and $1.1 million to other super PACs dedicated to electing Republicans.

From 2020 through the end of 2024, the company donated more than $1.6 million to conservative PACs, including a total of $850,000 to AFP Action, an anti-regulation super PAC with ties to the Koch network.

Bruce Taylor, the chairman and CEO of Taylor Farms, is also a longtime donor to Republican causes. Since 2020, Taylor has personally donated more than $900,000 to Republican PACs and candidates, including contributions to Texas senator John Cornyn and Tennessee senator Marsha Blackburn.

Like many corporate giants, Taylor Farms has also spent big on lobbying related to industry regulation. In early 2025, it hired lobbyists at the firm Sidley Austin to advocate on behalf of the company on “regulation of food safety,” according to disclosure documents. Since then, the company has spent $810,000 on its lobbying efforts.

Marion Nestle, a food policy expert, said that Taylor Farms’ donations are part of a wider problem in the American food industry: that multibillion-dollar companies use their financial resources to push policies that would reduce food safety regulation and accountability when outbreaks occur.

“The FDA has regulations in place for what food producers are supposed to be doing, but nobody wants to do it—because it’s expensive and difficult,” Nestle told WIRED.

In a post on X, the US Department of Health & Human Services emphasized that Taylor Farms’ political donations did not influence the Trump administration’s response to the cyclospora outbreak.

“This is how the FAKE NEWS works: imply collusion, ignore the facts,” the HHS account posted on Monday. “Nothing influences our decisions except science and the safety of the American people.”

Taylor Farms has apparently taken issue with the CDC’s and FDA’s handling of the investigation into the current cyclospora outbreak, which has sickened thousands of people across multiple states. The company recently claimed that the FDA “apologized” after announcing a false-positive test of a sample of Taylor Farms’ lettuce; the FDA told reporters that no, actually, an official apology never happened. (The company did not respond to WIRED’s requests for comment.)

Prior to the false positive and the non-apology, Taylor Farms executives met with White House and FDA officials to discuss what a spokesperson for the company called “shortfalls” in the government agencies’ response. The New York Times reported that the meeting followed Taylor Farms’ recent hire of Trent Morse, the former deputy director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, who left the Trump administration to start a government relations firm in September.

The recent diarrhea debacle is not the first time that Taylor Farms, which brings in roughly $7 billion in annual revenue, has drawn the focus of federal regulators.

In 2013, the FDA named Taylor Farms as a source of a cyclospora outbreak that sickened hundreds. In 2015, the company voluntarily recalled multiple products containing celery because they may have been contaminated with E. coli. And in 2024, the company recalled certain yellow onions as part of an E. coli outbreak linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounders. Following the outbreak, CBS News reported that FDA inspectors found dozens of violations at the Colorado Taylor Farms facility linked to the Quarter Pounder outbreak, including minimal handwashing and dirty equipment.

Since 2025, the FDA has inspected 18 American plants affiliated with Taylor Farms. Three resulted in “voluntary action indicated,” which means that while violations were found, they weren’t severe enough to warrant mandatory enforcement.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited at least 21 violations in Taylor Farms facilities across the US since the start of 2025. In one particularly gruesome case, the Department of Labor fined a New Jersey facility $1.1 million due to violations. The May 2025 inspection came after an employee died after sustaining injuries cleaning an industrial blancher at the facility.

#Taylor #Farms #Spent #Big #MAGA #AntiRegulatory #Lobbying #Diarrhea #Outbreakfda,donald trump,outbreak,food,agriculture,regulation,republicans,diarrhea

Post Comment