The highly anticipated conclusion to Universal Pictures’ adaptation of Wicked has finally hit theaters, tying together the story we thought we knew about Dorothy’s arrival in Oz. However, we don’t get to see much of the teen girl from Kansas after her house lands on top of the Wicked Witch of the East and she is sent off to see the Wizard (Jeff Goldblum) with shoes that don’t belong to her, thanks to Glinda (Ariana Grande) being petty.
Wicked: For Good shines enough on the incredible music and the powerful relationship between Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) and Glinda to distract from how it very minimally grazes over the beats of L. Frank Baum’s literary classic and MGM’s The Wizard of Oz. Yet, by the end there were so many choices made that left more questions than answers.
We’d hoped for an inspired take by visionary director Jon M. Chu, whose first Wicked installment set up a whole new version of Oz audiences around the world have fallen in love with. While the stage musical focuses on its good and bad witches, its cinematic release centered Nessarose (Marissa Bode), Fiyero (Jonathan Bailey), and Boq (Ethan Slater) as part of the ensemble. Along with them, so many setups were left unfulfilled in ways that made us want to take a trip down the yellow brick road for a conversation with the Wizard.
Here are the searing questions that still haunt and hurt us after watching Wicked: For Good.
1. Who supports the Wicked Witch, actually?

There’s not much explanation as to whether Elphaba’s efforts to free the animals have, at least over the years, garnered her any support in between the events of Wicked and Wicked: For Good. Oz hates her for presumably stealing the Grimmerie and helping the animals escape. But she’s also hated by the animals for helping—namely, the winged monkeys and the Cowardly Lion. Meanwhile, Glinda and Fiyero go along with finding her through the Wizard and Morrible’s narrative that she needs to be apprehended but don’t publicly stand up for their friend.
2. Why isn’t Dorothy’s story seen in Wicked?
In the stage musical, it makes sense for the Dorothy of it all to be done in shadowplay, considering it’s not a two-part story. The Broadway audience goes in knowing this is an alternate take on the events of The Wizard of Oz and doesn’t really need to be filled in. Wicked: Part One, however, builds out more of the relationships, including Elphaba’s sisterhood with Nessarose and the meaning of their mother’s shoes.
For some viewers, Wicked was their first introduction to the world of Oz, and the expansion of the story would seem to lend itself to a retelling of Dorothy’s role as a way in to all of the drama between the three witches. That, and there are a lot of Dorothy dolls and figures in playsets that made it feel like we’d get a bit more in Wicked: For Good about how a teen from Kansas is accidentally used as a pawn to kill Nessarose and then enlisted to melt Elphaba.
It’s really a disservice to a character who could have used a a reimagining through Chu’s creative lens to get a new generation of teens to relate to her. I mean, teens being used as political pawns? Evergreen. We get that she’s not a main character here, but she could have been used to solidify Elphie and Glinda’s love for one another, and not as a box to check.
3. Why was Fiyero playing dumb around Tin-Man Boq?

Yes, Fiyero gets turned into the Scarecrow, who joins Dorothy on the yellow brick road with the lion cub he saved, who seems to have no recollection of him but blames Elphaba for his cowardly nature, and his college friend, who has always been obsessed with his girlfriend and now has a literal ax to grind. In Wicked: For Good, Boq tries to escape the misery of being stuck with Nessa to stop Glinda from marrying Fiyero right before the Thropp sisters make him into a monster, and his motivation is still to get to Glinda even after that. He stares really hard at her from a crowd while spouting off his grievances against Elphaba for saving his life. Meanwhile, Glinda probably still doesn’t recognize Tin-Biq or her role in his male loneliness epidemic victimization. Yet, somehow, we’re supposed to believe he meets this teen girl and suddenly wants the Wizard to give him a heart? And doesn’t Fiyero’s guard suit match the Scarecrow’s outfit? Or does Fiyero say he also hates Elphaba for turning him?
4. When do Fiyero and Elphaba hatch the plan to fake her death?
The poppy field that the Wicked Witch of the West enchants to lull Dorothy and the Lion to sleep (set up at Shiz!) could have helped fill in this blank. There was no exchange between them—other than maybe giving us a moment of Fiyero seemingly turning against her because he’s “dumb” now to fool the audience and Boq—but that we could have later seen as the instant where they quickly hatched a plan before Boq came into the picture.
5. Is Boq still stalking Glinda?

This one haunts me the most because even when he had a heart, he was down bad for her, and then he gets one from the Wizard. So wouldn’t he just go back to being a stalker creep, but now looking more horrifying? Glinda, you in danger, girl. But in all seriousness: Boq not getting a resolution after getting established as a core ensemble member doesn’t work.
6. Was the Wizard ever thought of as a fraud?
After he leaves Oz upon realizing he just had his daughter killed, he basically takes his balloon back sans Dorothy as per the book. Everyone in the Emerald City is happy to see him go, but why? It’s not because they really hated him; he used them against the animals to create conflict to bolster himself, but to what end? Thanks for doing nothing, I guess.
7. Did no one clock Madam Morrible as the true bad guy besides Elphaba and Glinda?

Morrible puppeteering the Wizard to further her cause against the animals never made sense. It might have had she gotten a backstory as to her hate of animals, maybe being related to Doctor Dillamond for being smarter than her, and knowledge being more respected than power. That kind of framework would have explained her truly wicked need to take it out on animal kind. Also, her punishment? Too tame. She enslaved animals and killed the mayor of Munchkinland. Those monkeys had better have flown her straight to Elphie for real revenge.
8. Why does caging animals remove their ability to speak?
Besides the obvious symbolism, it’s never explained if the cages make the animals normal human-world creatures or if Morrible magicked away their voices. We see Dillamond return to Shiz at the end to teach, but there are no words or any sort of redemption of Elphaba in his class, at least!
9. How does Dorothy get home?
Elphaba gets a whole song about how “there’s no place like home,” a mantra that gets Dorothy home with the tapping of the magic witch shoes, most famously seen in The Wizard of Oz, but that is weirdly set up here with no payoff. There could have been a reprise at Nessarose’s feet, where Elphaba sees that home could never appreciate her, which would a) explain why she chooses to leave Oz with Fiyero, and b) could have been overheard by Glinda to help her come to terms with her role as the Good Witch for the people. It would have been fitting for her to use those words as the spell to affirm herself as a new leader while using it to magic the Thropp slippers to get Dorothy back to Kansas.
10. Why does Elphaba abandon the shoes and Oz?
In Wicked: For Good, Elphaba’s motivation is to stay in Oz to defend it despite it pushing her out, then it’s getting her mother’s shoes back, but after her heart-to-heart with Glinda, it all is just supposed to change. It’s so odd to see her relinquish her fight to encourage her friend to use her pretty privilege for good and find the magic within herself to do what she couldn’t because she’s green. But it’s okay because she’s got her straw prince and walks off to a distant land, which may or may not be the human world. Doesn’t matter.
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Source link
#Burning #Questions #Wicked #Good
![Sam Altman’s project World looks to scale its human verification empire. First stop: Tinder. | TechCrunch
At a trendy venue near the San Francisco pier, Sam Altman’s verification project World celebrated its next evolution and rapid expansion of its ambitions. And it’s starting with Tinder.
Tools for Humanity (TFH), the company behind the World project, announced Friday plans to integrate its verification tech into dating apps, event and concert ticketing systems, business organizations, email, and other arenas of public life.
“The world is getting close to very powerful AI, and this is doing a lot of wonderful things,” said Altman, speaking before a packed crowd at The Midway. “We are also heading to a world now where there’s going to be more stuff generated by AI than by humans,” he added. “I’m sure many of you [have had moments] where you’re like, ‘Am I interacting with an AI or a person, or how much of each, and how do I know?”
World (formerly Worldcoin) distinguishes itself from many of its ID verification peers by offering the ability to verify that a real, living human is using a digital service while still protecting that person’s anonymity. There is some complex cryptographic alchemy behind this (something called “zero-knowledge proof-based authentication”). The upshot: The company is creating what it calls “proof of human” tools, which are mechanisms that can verify human activity in a world rife with AI agents and bots.
Its chief tool for verification is a spherical digital reader called the Orb that scans a user’s eyes, converting their iris into a unique and anonymous cryptographic identifier (known as a verified World ID). This can then be used to access World’s services, although users can also access World’s app without one.
Altman kept his remarks brief on Friday (TFH’s co-founder and CEO, Alex Blania, was absent due to a last-minute hand surgery, Altman said). He then turned much of the presentation over to World’s chief product officer, Tiago Sada, and his team.
Sada explained that World was launching the newest version of its app (the last version was launched at an event in December), along with a plethora of new integrations for its technology.
World has been preparing, for some time, to deploy a verification service for dating apps — most notably, Tinder. Last year, Tinder launched a World ID pilot program in Japan. That pilot was apparently a success because World announced that Tinder would be launching its verification integration in global markets —including the U.S. The program integrates a World ID emblem into the profiles of users who have gone through its verification processes, thus authenticating them as a real person.
Image Credits:World
World is also courting the entertainment industry by launching a new feature called Concert Kit, where musical artists can reserve a certain number of concert tickets for World ID-verified humans. This is designed to ensure that fans are safe from scalpers who often use automated ticket-buying bots to scarf up seats. Concert Kit is compatible with major ticketing systems, including Ticketmaster and Eventbrite, and the company is promoting it via partnerships with 30 Seconds to Mars and Bruno Mars — both of whom plan to use it for their upcoming tours.
The event was full of many other announcements, including some aimed at businesses. A Zoom/World ID verification integration seeks to battle a supposed deepfake threat to business calls, and a Docusign partnership is designed to ensure signatures come from authentic users.
The company is also working on a number of features in anticipation of the Wild West of the agentic web, including one called “agent delegation,” in which a person can delegate their World ID to an agent to carry out online activities on their behalf. A partnership with authentication firm Okta has also created a system (currently in beta) that verifies that an agent is acting on behalf of a human. The system is set up so that a World ID can be tied to a specific agent and then, when the agent goes out into the web to operate on that person’s behalf, websites will know a verified person is behind the behavior, said Okta’s chief product officer, Gareth Davies, at the event.
So far, it’s been difficult for World to scale, due largely to the verification process itself. For much of the company’s history, to get its gold standard, you had to travel to one of its offices and have your eyeballs scanned by an Orb — a fairly inconvenient (not to mention weird) experience.
Image Credits:World
However, World has continually made moves to increase the ease and incentive structure for verification. In the past, it offered its crypto asset, Worldcoin, to some members who signed up and has distributed its Orbs into big retail chains so that users can verify themselves while they’re out shopping or getting a coffee. Now the company is announcing that it is significantly expanding its Orb saturation in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. The company also promoted a service where interested users could have World bring an Orb to their location for remote verification.
In a conversation with TechCrunch, Sada also shared that World has attempted to solve the scaling problem by creating different tiers of verification. The highest tier is Orb verification, but below that, World has previously offered a mid-level tier, which uses an anonymized scan of an official government ID via the card’s NFC chip.
The company also introduced a low-level tier, or what Sada called “low friction”— meaning low effort, I guess, but also “low security” — which involves merely taking a selfie.
Selfie Check, which Sada’s team presented during the event, is designed to maintain user privacy.
“Selfie is private by design,” said Daniel Shorr, one of TFH’s executives, during the presentation. “That means that we maximize the local processing that’s happening on your device, on your phone, which means that your images are yours.”
Selfie verification obviously isn’t new, and fraudsters have long managed to spoof it. “Obviously, we do our best, and it’s like one of the best systems that you’ll see for this. But it has limits,” Sada told TechCrunch. Developers looking to integrate World’s services can choose from the three different verification tiers depending on the level of security that’s important to them, he noted.
#Sam #Altmans #project #World #scale #human #verification #empire #stop #Tinder #TechCrunchDocuSign,sam altman,Tinder,World,Worldcoin,zoom Sam Altman’s project World looks to scale its human verification empire. First stop: Tinder. | TechCrunch
At a trendy venue near the San Francisco pier, Sam Altman’s verification project World celebrated its next evolution and rapid expansion of its ambitions. And it’s starting with Tinder.
Tools for Humanity (TFH), the company behind the World project, announced Friday plans to integrate its verification tech into dating apps, event and concert ticketing systems, business organizations, email, and other arenas of public life.
“The world is getting close to very powerful AI, and this is doing a lot of wonderful things,” said Altman, speaking before a packed crowd at The Midway. “We are also heading to a world now where there’s going to be more stuff generated by AI than by humans,” he added. “I’m sure many of you [have had moments] where you’re like, ‘Am I interacting with an AI or a person, or how much of each, and how do I know?”
World (formerly Worldcoin) distinguishes itself from many of its ID verification peers by offering the ability to verify that a real, living human is using a digital service while still protecting that person’s anonymity. There is some complex cryptographic alchemy behind this (something called “zero-knowledge proof-based authentication”). The upshot: The company is creating what it calls “proof of human” tools, which are mechanisms that can verify human activity in a world rife with AI agents and bots.
Its chief tool for verification is a spherical digital reader called the Orb that scans a user’s eyes, converting their iris into a unique and anonymous cryptographic identifier (known as a verified World ID). This can then be used to access World’s services, although users can also access World’s app without one.
Altman kept his remarks brief on Friday (TFH’s co-founder and CEO, Alex Blania, was absent due to a last-minute hand surgery, Altman said). He then turned much of the presentation over to World’s chief product officer, Tiago Sada, and his team.
Sada explained that World was launching the newest version of its app (the last version was launched at an event in December), along with a plethora of new integrations for its technology.
World has been preparing, for some time, to deploy a verification service for dating apps — most notably, Tinder. Last year, Tinder launched a World ID pilot program in Japan. That pilot was apparently a success because World announced that Tinder would be launching its verification integration in global markets —including the U.S. The program integrates a World ID emblem into the profiles of users who have gone through its verification processes, thus authenticating them as a real person.
Image Credits:World
World is also courting the entertainment industry by launching a new feature called Concert Kit, where musical artists can reserve a certain number of concert tickets for World ID-verified humans. This is designed to ensure that fans are safe from scalpers who often use automated ticket-buying bots to scarf up seats. Concert Kit is compatible with major ticketing systems, including Ticketmaster and Eventbrite, and the company is promoting it via partnerships with 30 Seconds to Mars and Bruno Mars — both of whom plan to use it for their upcoming tours.
The event was full of many other announcements, including some aimed at businesses. A Zoom/World ID verification integration seeks to battle a supposed deepfake threat to business calls, and a Docusign partnership is designed to ensure signatures come from authentic users.
The company is also working on a number of features in anticipation of the Wild West of the agentic web, including one called “agent delegation,” in which a person can delegate their World ID to an agent to carry out online activities on their behalf. A partnership with authentication firm Okta has also created a system (currently in beta) that verifies that an agent is acting on behalf of a human. The system is set up so that a World ID can be tied to a specific agent and then, when the agent goes out into the web to operate on that person’s behalf, websites will know a verified person is behind the behavior, said Okta’s chief product officer, Gareth Davies, at the event.
So far, it’s been difficult for World to scale, due largely to the verification process itself. For much of the company’s history, to get its gold standard, you had to travel to one of its offices and have your eyeballs scanned by an Orb — a fairly inconvenient (not to mention weird) experience.
Image Credits:World
However, World has continually made moves to increase the ease and incentive structure for verification. In the past, it offered its crypto asset, Worldcoin, to some members who signed up and has distributed its Orbs into big retail chains so that users can verify themselves while they’re out shopping or getting a coffee. Now the company is announcing that it is significantly expanding its Orb saturation in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. The company also promoted a service where interested users could have World bring an Orb to their location for remote verification.
In a conversation with TechCrunch, Sada also shared that World has attempted to solve the scaling problem by creating different tiers of verification. The highest tier is Orb verification, but below that, World has previously offered a mid-level tier, which uses an anonymized scan of an official government ID via the card’s NFC chip.
The company also introduced a low-level tier, or what Sada called “low friction”— meaning low effort, I guess, but also “low security” — which involves merely taking a selfie.
Selfie Check, which Sada’s team presented during the event, is designed to maintain user privacy.
“Selfie is private by design,” said Daniel Shorr, one of TFH’s executives, during the presentation. “That means that we maximize the local processing that’s happening on your device, on your phone, which means that your images are yours.”
Selfie verification obviously isn’t new, and fraudsters have long managed to spoof it. “Obviously, we do our best, and it’s like one of the best systems that you’ll see for this. But it has limits,” Sada told TechCrunch. Developers looking to integrate World’s services can choose from the three different verification tiers depending on the level of security that’s important to them, he noted.
#Sam #Altmans #project #World #scale #human #verification #empire #stop #Tinder #TechCrunchDocuSign,sam altman,Tinder,World,Worldcoin,zoom](https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Screenshot-2026-04-17-at-1.55.00-PM.png?w=680)






Post Comment