×
Deadspin | NHL roundup: Stars top Wild in double OT to take 2-1 series lead  Apr 22, 2026; Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA; Dallas Stars center Wyatt Johnston (53) celebrates his game winning goal during the second overtime period in game three of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs against the Minnesota Wild at Grand Casino Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-Imagn Images   Wyatt Johnston scored a power-play goal with 7:50 left in double overtime to lift the Dallas Stars to a 4-3 win over the Minnesota Wild in Game 3 of their Western Conference quarterfinal series on Wednesday in Saint Paul, Minn.  Matt Duchene and Jason Robertson finished with a goal and two assists apiece for Dallas, which grabbed a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series. Johnston and Mikko Rantanen each tallied one goal and one assist.  Jake Oettinger stopped 28 of 31 shots to win the marathon contest.  Marcus Johansson, Joel Eriksson Ek and Michael McCarron scored one goal apiece for Minnesota. Jesper Wallstedt allowed four goals on 36 shots.  Ducks 6, Oilers 4  Cutter Gauthier produced two goals and an assist as Anaheim evened its Western Conference first-round playoff series against Edmonton in Game 2.  Ryan Poehling also scored twice for the Ducks. Alex Killorn had a goal and two assists, Jacob Trouba added a goal, Jackson LaCombe had three assists, and Lukas Dostal made 33 saves.   Leon Draisaitl registered a goal and an assist and Connor Ingram stopped 22 shots for the Oilers. Connor Murphy, Zach Hyman and Josh Samanski posted Edmonton’s other goals.  Flyers 5, Penguins 2  Trevor Zegras, Rasmus Ristolainen, Nick Seeler and Noah Cates all scored their first career playoff goals to guide Philadelphia over Pittsburgh and a 3-0 series lead.  Dan Vladar had 28 saves in the win and Owen Tippett had the other goal for the Flyers. Cates and Zegras each added an assist, and Jamie Drysdale, Sean Couturier and Noah Juulsen logged two assists apiece.  Evgeni Malkin and Erik Karlsson scored for Pittsburgh, which needs to win Saturday in Philadelphia to save its season. Stuart Skinner made 24 saves for the Penguins.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #NHL #roundup #Stars #top #Wild #double #series #lead

Deadspin | NHL roundup: Stars top Wild in double OT to take 2-1 series lead
Deadspin | NHL roundup: Stars top Wild in double OT to take 2-1 series lead  Apr 22, 2026; Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA; Dallas Stars center Wyatt Johnston (53) celebrates his game winning goal during the second overtime period in game three of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs against the Minnesota Wild at Grand Casino Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-Imagn Images   Wyatt Johnston scored a power-play goal with 7:50 left in double overtime to lift the Dallas Stars to a 4-3 win over the Minnesota Wild in Game 3 of their Western Conference quarterfinal series on Wednesday in Saint Paul, Minn.  Matt Duchene and Jason Robertson finished with a goal and two assists apiece for Dallas, which grabbed a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series. Johnston and Mikko Rantanen each tallied one goal and one assist.  Jake Oettinger stopped 28 of 31 shots to win the marathon contest.  Marcus Johansson, Joel Eriksson Ek and Michael McCarron scored one goal apiece for Minnesota. Jesper Wallstedt allowed four goals on 36 shots.  Ducks 6, Oilers 4  Cutter Gauthier produced two goals and an assist as Anaheim evened its Western Conference first-round playoff series against Edmonton in Game 2.  Ryan Poehling also scored twice for the Ducks. Alex Killorn had a goal and two assists, Jacob Trouba added a goal, Jackson LaCombe had three assists, and Lukas Dostal made 33 saves.   Leon Draisaitl registered a goal and an assist and Connor Ingram stopped 22 shots for the Oilers. Connor Murphy, Zach Hyman and Josh Samanski posted Edmonton’s other goals.  Flyers 5, Penguins 2  Trevor Zegras, Rasmus Ristolainen, Nick Seeler and Noah Cates all scored their first career playoff goals to guide Philadelphia over Pittsburgh and a 3-0 series lead.  Dan Vladar had 28 saves in the win and Owen Tippett had the other goal for the Flyers. Cates and Zegras each added an assist, and Jamie Drysdale, Sean Couturier and Noah Juulsen logged two assists apiece.  Evgeni Malkin and Erik Karlsson scored for Pittsburgh, which needs to win Saturday in Philadelphia to save its season. Stuart Skinner made 24 saves for the Penguins.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #NHL #roundup #Stars #top #Wild #double #series #leadApr 22, 2026; Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA; Dallas Stars center Wyatt Johnston (53) celebrates his game winning goal during the second overtime period in game three of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs against the Minnesota Wild at Grand Casino Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-Imagn Images

Wyatt Johnston scored a power-play goal with 7:50 left in double overtime to lift the Dallas Stars to a 4-3 win over the Minnesota Wild in Game 3 of their Western Conference quarterfinal series on Wednesday in Saint Paul, Minn.

Matt Duchene and Jason Robertson finished with a goal and two assists apiece for Dallas, which grabbed a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series. Johnston and Mikko Rantanen each tallied one goal and one assist.

Jake Oettinger stopped 28 of 31 shots to win the marathon contest.

Marcus Johansson, Joel Eriksson Ek and Michael McCarron scored one goal apiece for Minnesota. Jesper Wallstedt allowed four goals on 36 shots.

Ducks 6, Oilers 4

Cutter Gauthier produced two goals and an assist as Anaheim evened its Western Conference first-round playoff series against Edmonton in Game 2.


Ryan Poehling also scored twice for the Ducks. Alex Killorn had a goal and two assists, Jacob Trouba added a goal, Jackson LaCombe had three assists, and Lukas Dostal made 33 saves.

Leon Draisaitl registered a goal and an assist and Connor Ingram stopped 22 shots for the Oilers. Connor Murphy, Zach Hyman and Josh Samanski posted Edmonton’s other goals.

Flyers 5, Penguins 2

Trevor Zegras, Rasmus Ristolainen, Nick Seeler and Noah Cates all scored their first career playoff goals to guide Philadelphia over Pittsburgh and a 3-0 series lead.

Dan Vladar had 28 saves in the win and Owen Tippett had the other goal for the Flyers. Cates and Zegras each added an assist, and Jamie Drysdale, Sean Couturier and Noah Juulsen logged two assists apiece.

Evgeni Malkin and Erik Karlsson scored for Pittsburgh, which needs to win Saturday in Philadelphia to save its season. Stuart Skinner made 24 saves for the Penguins.

–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #NHL #roundup #Stars #top #Wild #double #series #lead

Apr 22, 2026; Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA; Dallas Stars center Wyatt Johnston (53) celebrates his game winning goal during the second overtime period in game three of the first round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs against the Minnesota Wild at Grand Casino Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Krohn-Imagn Images

Wyatt Johnston scored a power-play goal with 7:50 left in double overtime to lift the Dallas Stars to a 4-3 win over the Minnesota Wild in Game 3 of their Western Conference quarterfinal series on Wednesday in Saint Paul, Minn.

Matt Duchene and Jason Robertson finished with a goal and two assists apiece for Dallas, which grabbed a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series. Johnston and Mikko Rantanen each tallied one goal and one assist.

Jake Oettinger stopped 28 of 31 shots to win the marathon contest.

Marcus Johansson, Joel Eriksson Ek and Michael McCarron scored one goal apiece for Minnesota. Jesper Wallstedt allowed four goals on 36 shots.

Ducks 6, Oilers 4

Cutter Gauthier produced two goals and an assist as Anaheim evened its Western Conference first-round playoff series against Edmonton in Game 2.

Ryan Poehling also scored twice for the Ducks. Alex Killorn had a goal and two assists, Jacob Trouba added a goal, Jackson LaCombe had three assists, and Lukas Dostal made 33 saves.

Leon Draisaitl registered a goal and an assist and Connor Ingram stopped 22 shots for the Oilers. Connor Murphy, Zach Hyman and Josh Samanski posted Edmonton’s other goals.

Flyers 5, Penguins 2

Trevor Zegras, Rasmus Ristolainen, Nick Seeler and Noah Cates all scored their first career playoff goals to guide Philadelphia over Pittsburgh and a 3-0 series lead.

Dan Vladar had 28 saves in the win and Owen Tippett had the other goal for the Flyers. Cates and Zegras each added an assist, and Jamie Drysdale, Sean Couturier and Noah Juulsen logged two assists apiece.

Evgeni Malkin and Erik Karlsson scored for Pittsburgh, which needs to win Saturday in Philadelphia to save its season. Stuart Skinner made 24 saves for the Penguins.

–Field Level Media

Source link
#Deadspin #NHL #roundup #Stars #top #Wild #double #series #lead

Previous post

Must Read: Timothée Chalamet Invests in Watchmaker Urban Jürgensen, Moncler Group Reports 12% Revenue Boost in Q1 2026

Next post

How Ukraine is rebuilding its energy system under fire<div data-tracking-skip="true" data-tracking-name="rich-text"><p>In autumn 2024, Russia launched massive aerial assaults on Ukraine, pounding its energy system and raising fears about the <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/russias-strikes-threaten-ukraines-nuclear-safety/a-74713399">safety of its nuclear power plants.</a> Several reactors disconnected from the grid. One shut down entirely.</p> <p>“It wasn’t that we were scared,” says Shaun Burnie, recalling that night. “It was that we were terrified.”</p> <p>For Greenpeace veteran nuclear specialist Burnie, who has worked in some of the most <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/fukushima/t-17452953">radioactive places</a> on earth, the danger lay in what could have followed.</p><figure class="placeholder-image master_landscape big"><img data-format="MASTER_LANDSCAPE" data-id="76907621" data-url="https://static.dw.com/image/76907621_${formatId}.jpg" data-aspect-ratio="16/9" alt="A man wearing glasses, an orange hard hat, face mask and protective gear standing inside the Chernobyl new safe confinement. He is being interviewed." style="padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; max-height: 0;"/><figcaption class="img-caption">Shaun Burnie has been inside the structure protecing the Chernobyl reactor three times and says he’s not keen to have to make too many return visits<small class="copyright">Image: Pavlo Siromenko/Greenpeace</small></figcaption></figure> <p>Nuclear plants rely on a constant external power supply to run cooling systems for the reactor core and spent fuel. If the grid buckles and plants disconnect, they switch to diesel generators.</p> <p>In a worst-case scenario, if they can’t reconnect, cooling systems fail and reactors overheat. Ukraine knows what that means. On April 26 1986, <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/chernobyl/t-17453512">a reactor at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant</a> exploded, forcing the evacuation of hundreds of thousands from the area and contaminating large parts of Europe.</p> <p>“Chernobyl is part of our collective memory. Everyone has family or community stories about it,” says Lena Kondratiuk, a 25-year-old from Rivne in western Ukraine. “And now, during the war, this meaning has become even more real.”</p><div class="vjs-wrapper embed big"><h2 aria-label="Embedded video — The lasting legacy of Chernobyl" class="headline"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox="0 0 20 20"><g fill-rule="evenodd"><path d="M14.114 7.599H13.5l.002 4.706h.601l4.582 3.25-.005-11.11zM11.084 4.444l-9.007.002-1.336.797.002 9.514 1.334.793 9.007.006 1.509-.799-.004-9.516z"/></g></svg>The lasting legacy of Chernobyl</h2><video id="video-76838299" controls="" playsinline="" preload="none" poster="" data-id="76838299" data-posterurl="https://static.dw.com/image/76816641_605.webp" data-duration="11:11"><source src="https://hlsvod.dw.com/i/dwtv_video/flv/a21/a2120260418_ChernobylB2_,AVC_480x270,AVC_512x288,AVC_640x360,AVC_960x540,AVC_1280x720,AVC_1920x1080,.mp4.csmil/master.m3u8" type="application/x-mpegURL"><source src="https://tvdownloaddw-a.akamaihd.net/dwtv_video/flv/a21/a2120260418_ChernobylB2_AVC_1920x1080.mp4" type="video/mp4"><track src="https://www.dw.com/media/subtitles/76841191" srclang="en" label="ENGLISH" default=""><p class="vjs-no-js">To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that <a href="https://videojs.com/html5-video-support/" target="_blank">supports HTML5 video</a></p></track></source></source></video></div> <h2>A system under pressure</h2> <p>Though Ukraine still depends on nuclear energy for more than half of its electricity and plans to build more reactors, the worst-case scenario hasn’t happened. But the threat <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/russia-ukraine-report-overnight-strikes-on-energy-infrastructure/a-76078205">remains as Russia continues to target energy infrastructure.</a></p> <p>More than half of Ukraine’s power generation capacity has been damaged or destroyed. UN nuclear watchdog, the <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/international-atomic-energy-agency-iaea/t-17449170">International Atomic Energy Agency,</a> has called the situation <a rel="noopener follow" target="_blank" class="external-link" href="https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/01/1166863" title="External link — "the world's biggest threat to nuclear safety."">“the world’s biggest threat to nuclear safety.” <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="20" height="20" viewbox="0 0 20 20"><path d="M11.5 3.5 11.5 4.233C14.342 4.233 15.167 4.245 15.167 4.258L8.984 10.467 10.033 11.516C14.826 6.725 16.228 5.333 16.242 5.333L16.267 9 17.733 9 17.733 2.767 11.5 2.767 11.5 3.5M2.267 11 2.267 17.233 16.733 17.233 16.733 12 15.267 12 15.25 15.75 9.5 15.75 3.75 15.75 3.75 6.25 9.5 6.233 9.5 4.767 2.267 4.767 2.267 11 "/></svg></a></p> <p>Because large, centralized plants — nuclear, coal, or gas — that generate huge amounts of electricity in one place are such easy targets, decentralization is an attractive idea.</p> <p>And that also means more <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/renewable-energy/t-19008095">renewable energy,</a> which is harder to target, cheaper to fix, and faster to deploy.</p> <p>Chris Alyett, an energy specialist at UK think tank Chatham House said that while a single missile can take out a 250-megawatt coal plant, it would require 40 to destroy the same capacity in <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/wind-power/t-19044460">wind generation.</a> Solar parks are also more resistant.</p> <p>“If there is damage to that, it doesn’t necessarily need to take everything out — you could swap new panels in,” Aylett said.</p> <figure class="placeholder-image master_landscape big"><img data-format="MASTER_LANDSCAPE" data-id="76062407" data-url="https://static.dw.com/image/76062407_${formatId}.jpg" data-aspect-ratio="16/9" alt="A man in an orange hard hat repairing a damaged electricity substation" style="padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; max-height: 0;"/><figcaption class="img-caption">Engineers repairing the grid have helped avert disaster, but some have been killed in Russian “double tap” strikes in the course of their work<small class="copyright">Image: Vyacheslav Madiyevskyy/REUTERS</small></figcaption></figure><p>These benefits are driving Ukrainian energy companies and NGOs to push renewables. <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/solar-power/t-19029982">Rooftop solar</a> now covers hospitals, schools, and public buildings. In 2025, the country installed enough to power over a million homes, all while under fire.</p> <h2>Keeping the lights on with renewables</h2> <p>Lena Kondratiuk is part of that effort. She joined the NGO Ecoclub as a volunteer at 18, before taking on a job as renewables analyst there in 2020. After <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/russias-war-in-ukraine/t-60931789">Russia’s full-scale invasion,</a> the organization shifted from advocacy worked and launched the <a rel="noopener follow" target="_blank" class="external-link" href="https://ecoclubrivne.org/en/solar_aid4ukraine_en/" title="External link — Solar Aid for Ukraine campaign">Solar Aid for Ukraine campaign<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="20" height="20" viewbox="0 0 20 20"><path d="M11.5 3.5 11.5 4.233C14.342 4.233 15.167 4.245 15.167 4.258L8.984 10.467 10.033 11.516C14.826 6.725 16.228 5.333 16.242 5.333L16.267 9 17.733 9 17.733 2.767 11.5 2.767 11.5 3.5M2.267 11 2.267 17.233 16.733 17.233 16.733 12 15.267 12 15.25 15.75 9.5 15.75 3.75 15.75 3.75 6.25 9.5 6.233 9.5 4.767 2.267 4.767 2.267 11 "/></svg></a>, as <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/blankets-batteries-fires-how-kyiv-is-surviving-icy-winter/a-75525775">power outages</a> became a part of daily life.</p> <p>At 21, she began managing projects. At first, she was daunted by the responsibility but agreed to it “because of the war, because I understand that, for example, I can die tomorrow.”</p><figure class="placeholder-image master_landscape big"><img data-format="MASTER_LANDSCAPE" data-id="76909510" data-url="https://static.dw.com/image/76909510_${formatId}.jpg" data-aspect-ratio="16/9" alt="A woman smiling and standing in front of solar panels " style="padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; max-height: 0;"/><figcaption class="img-caption">Lena Kondratiuk travels around the country bringing solar power to communities with NGO Ecoclub <small class="copyright">Image: Ecoclub</small></figcaption></figure> <p>Like many Ukrainians she has learned to adapt. Her work now takes her all over the country, including south to Mykolaiv, about 60 kilometers (37 miles) from the front line. On her first trip to the city, it was being shelled and running on diesel generators.</p> <p>“I didn’t want to come back to the city because I’m scared,” she says.</p> <p>Now Kondraktiuk makes the 13-hour trip around once a month, even as Russia targets passenger trains. She loves it there because of the people. “They teach that even during such a war time it’s still possible to find happy moments in your life and continue it.”</p><span data-slot-id="Article_InContent-1" class="rich-text-ad"/> <h2>Renewable energy as survival</h2> <p>Despite the risks, Kondratiuk has helped bring nearly 90 solar systems online. In places like Mykolaiv, these systems are more than green energy, they are lifelines.</p> <p>“Renewable energy in Ukraine is not about the climate and sustainability; it’s about surviving now,” says Kondratiuk. “It’s about the access to basic needs.”</p> <p>These solar and battery systems keep water utilities running during blackouts. They also enable hospitals to operate and children to charge their phones during outages so they can keep in touch with their parents.</p><figure class="placeholder-image master_landscape big"><img data-format="MASTER_LANDSCAPE" data-id="76909046" data-url="https://static.dw.com/image/76909046_${formatId}.jpg" data-aspect-ratio="16/9" alt="Three men installing solar panels on a rooftop" style="padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; max-height: 0;"/><figcaption class="img-caption">Hybrid solar and battery systems have proven to be a lifeline for Ukrainians during blackouts<small class="copyright">Image: Anatolii Stepanov/AFP</small></figcaption></figure> <p>One project she worked on installed solar panels at a care home for women with mental health and neurological conditions. Before the installation, staff woke at 4am to try and prepare meals ahead of power cuts, but the patients often went without warm food.</p> <p>“And after that they were happy because they have like access to everything,” she says.</p> <h2>Lessons learned from Ukraine</h2> <p>The priority for Ukrainians is to keep power flowing. Nuclear has been essential to that, and without it, experts say Ukraine would be in a far worse position given how much fossil fuel capacity has been destroyed during the war. The country still needs baseload power.</p> <p>Chris Aylett has been looking at what other countries in Europe can learn from Ukraine’s experience of running an energy grid under constant attack.</p> <p>“They’ve gone through this terrible experience, they’re continuing to go through it, they’ve shown amazing sort of ingenuity at rebuilding fast and it’s told us a lot about what’s vulnerable and what you need to consider,” he says.</p><div class="vjs-wrapper embed big"><h2 aria-label="Embedded video — The hidden cost of nuclear power" class="headline"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox="0 0 20 20"><g fill-rule="evenodd"><path d="M14.114 7.599H13.5l.002 4.706h.601l4.582 3.25-.005-11.11zM11.084 4.444l-9.007.002-1.336.797.002 9.514 1.334.793 9.007.006 1.509-.799-.004-9.516z"/></g></svg>The hidden cost of nuclear power</h2><video id="video-75412400" controls="" playsinline="" preload="none" poster="" data-id="75412400" data-posterurl="https://static.dw.com/image/75452808_605.webp" data-duration="15:13"><source src="https://hlsvod.dw.com/i/vps/webvideos/ENG/2026/PLNA/PLNAENG251223_NuclearDecom_01SMW_,AVC_480x270,AVC_512x288,AVC_640x360,AVC_960x540,AVC_1280x720,AVC_1920x1080,.mp4.csmil/master.m3u8" type="application/x-mpegURL"><source src="https://tvdownloaddw-a.akamaihd.net/vps/webvideos/ENG/2026/PLNA/PLNAENG251223_NuclearDecom_01SMW_AVC_1920x1080.mp4" type="video/mp4"><track src="https://www.dw.com/media/subtitles/75453180" srclang="en" label="ENGLISH" default=""><p class="vjs-no-js">To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that <a href="https://videojs.com/html5-video-support/" target="_blank">supports HTML5 video</a></p></track></source></source></video></div> <p>The main lesson is the geographical spread of infrastructure — and that applies regardless of energy source. Diversifying the mix, with more renewables and storage, is another. As is stockpiling the right components that keep a system running — and standardizing them, so restoration takes weeks rather than months.</p> <p>Alyett says the war, and the <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/strait-of-hormuz/t-76193780">conflict in the Strait of Hormuz,</a> have further made the case for rapid decarbonization and renewables in “fossil-fuel poor” Europe, alongside “tackling <a class="internal-link" href="https://www.dw.com/en/climate-change/t-18614374">climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”</a></p> <p>On nuclear’s future, he is pragmatic, saying that in countries such as France, where it is a major energy source, he sees no reason for that to stop. “Ultimately you just want to build out as much low carbon as you can, and make it as secure as you can while you’re doing it.”</p> <p>Kondratiuk says she’s glad she was born long after Chernobyl — even as she lives through a different kind of disaster in Ukraine, one she doesn’t expect to end soon. But she’s still looking to a time when the war is over.</p> <p>“I still want to help my country, still want to continue my work at the Ecoclub and I still think that even after the war and after our victory there would be even more work compared to now because we have to rebuild the country and rebuild it in greener and better way,” she says.</p> <p><em>Edited by: Tamsin Walker</em></p> <p><em>This story was adapted from an episode of DW’s Living Planet podcast. </em></p> </div>#Ukraine #rebuilding #energy #system #fire

By winning Group D, the United States has already booked a spot in the Round of 32 at the 2026 World Cup.

So who will they play in the knockout round?

That … is a complicated question. A complicated question that involves brackets, Annex C of the FIFA Rules and Regulations, a matrix, and 495 potential combinations of the eight third-place teams advancing out of group play and into the knockout round.

So, let’s try to answer that question the best we can, starting with the World Cup bracket itself.

Wednesday could be pivotal for the United States at the 2026 World Cup. While the USMNT is not playing today, Wednesday is the final day of matches in Group B. Read on to see why that could determine who the United States plays in the Round of 32.

Update: And with Bosnia and Herzegovina clinching third in Group B, while it is not set in stone, they are the most likely opponent for the United States in the Round of 32. Read on for why.

The 2026 World Cup bracket

Let’s start here, with this World Cup bracket courtesy of USA Today.

If you look down to the bottom-left quadrant of this bracket, you will see where the United States will be slotted in when the Round of 32 is finalized. As the winners of Group D, they will slide into that “1D” spot, and play a third place team from Group B, E, F, I, or J.

With the expansion of the World Cup to 48 teams, the top two teams from each group advance to the Round of 32, plus the eight best third-place teams. More on that in a moment.

Who are the potential opponents for the US?

So, who might the United States see in the Round of 32?

Here are the teams in each potential group. For more on each group, you can visit the link, which takes you to the full standings and knockout-round scenarios for each of those groups.

  • Group B: Canada, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Qatar, and Switzerland
  • Group E: Germany, Curaçao, Ivory Coast, and Ecuador
  • Group F: Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, and Tunisia (Note, Tunisia has already been eliminated from knockout round contention)
  • Group I: France, Senegal, Norway, and Iraq
  • Group J: Argentina, Algeria, Austria, and Jordan

As of publication, these are the third-place teams in each of those groups: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ecuador, Sweden, Senegal, and Jordan. However, only Ecuador and Sweden. However, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Senegal, and Jordan are not among the eight best third-place teams, so if the Round of 32 began today, the options for the United States would be down to Ecuador or Sweden. More on that in a second.

You can read more about the ranking of the third-place teams here, where we are updating the third-place standings after each match.

Prior to the World Cup, FIFA published Annex C to the FIFA Rules and Regulations, which outlines the 495 possible combinations for the third-place teams. That matrix, and those 495 possible combinations, dictate the matches involving the third-place teams.

At the time of publication, with Groups B, I, J, and L sitting at the bottom of the third-place standings, that combination is found in Annex C as combination 283. In that scenario, the United States would play … the third-place team from Group E.

Which right now is Ecuador.

Another good method of visualizing these combinations comes courtesy of Wikipedia.

So for the moment, the United States is set to take on Ecuador. But as the third-place standings shift, the combination will change, the matrix will be adjusted, and we will offer the updates accordingly.

In looking at the 495 possible combinations, it should be noted that 329 of those result in the United States playing Group B, 39 combinations result in the United States playing Group E, 11 combinations result in the United States playing Group F, 52 combinations result in the United States playing Group I, and 64 result in the United States playing Group J.

So it is no wonder that many believe that ultimately, the United States will play the third-place team from Group B, which could come down to the winner of Wednesday’s match between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Qatar.

Another way to look at the scenarios? According to the experts at Expecting Goals, there is a 60% chance that the United States plays Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Round of 32, and a 17% chance the United States plays Qatar:

Senegal and Ecuador round out the options, with Senegal at 6% and Ecuador at 4%.

We will know for sure in a few days.

Update: Following Monday night’s late match between Jordan and Algeria, Algeria has moved into third place in Group J, changing the matrix. As a result, as of Tuesday, June 23, the opponent for the United States in the Round of 32 would be … Algeria.

Again, this likely changes over the next few days. Stay tuned.

#play #knockout #World #Cup">Who will the US play in the knockout round of the World Cup?  By winning Group D, the United States has already booked a spot in the Round of 32 at the 2026 World Cup.So who will they play in the knockout round?That … is a complicated question. A complicated question that involves brackets, Annex C of the FIFA Rules and Regulations, a matrix, and 495 potential combinations of the eight third-place teams advancing out of group play and into the knockout round.So, let’s try to answer that question the best we can, starting with the World Cup bracket itself.Wednesday could be pivotal for the United States at the 2026 World Cup. While the USMNT is not playing today, Wednesday is the final day of matches in Group B. Read on to see why that could determine who the United States plays in the Round of 32.Update: And with Bosnia and Herzegovina clinching third in Group B, while it is not set in stone, they are the most likely opponent for the United States in the Round of 32. Read on for why.The 2026 World Cup bracketLet’s start here, with this World Cup bracket courtesy of USA Today.If you look down to the bottom-left quadrant of this bracket, you will see where the United States will be slotted in when the Round of 32 is finalized. As the winners of Group D, they will slide into that “1D” spot, and play a third place team from Group B, E, F, I, or J.With the expansion of the World Cup to 48 teams, the top two teams from each group advance to the Round of 32, plus the eight best third-place teams. More on that in a moment.Who are the potential opponents for the US?So, who might the United States see in the Round of 32?Here are the teams in each potential group. For more on each group, you can visit the link, which takes you to the full standings and knockout-round scenarios for each of those groups.Group B: Canada, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Qatar, and SwitzerlandGroup E: Germany, Curaçao, Ivory Coast, and EcuadorGroup F: Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, and Tunisia (Note, Tunisia has already been eliminated from knockout round contention)Group I: France, Senegal, Norway, and IraqGroup J: Argentina, Algeria, Austria, and JordanAs of publication, these are the third-place teams in each of those groups: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ecuador, Sweden, Senegal, and Jordan. However, only Ecuador and Sweden. However, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Senegal, and Jordan are not among the eight best third-place teams, so if the Round of 32 began today, the options for the United States would be down to Ecuador or Sweden. More on that in a second.You can read more about the ranking of the third-place teams here, where we are updating the third-place standings after each match.Prior to the World Cup, FIFA published Annex C to the FIFA Rules and Regulations, which outlines the 495 possible combinations for the third-place teams. That matrix, and those 495 possible combinations, dictate the matches involving the third-place teams.At the time of publication, with Groups B, I, J, and L sitting at the bottom of the third-place standings, that combination is found in Annex C as combination 283. In that scenario, the United States would play … the third-place team from Group E.Which right now is Ecuador.Another good method of visualizing these combinations comes courtesy of Wikipedia. So for the moment, the United States is set to take on Ecuador. But as the third-place standings shift, the combination will change, the matrix will be adjusted, and we will offer the updates accordingly.In looking at the 495 possible combinations, it should be noted that 329 of those result in the United States playing Group B, 39 combinations result in the United States playing Group E, 11 combinations result in the United States playing Group F, 52 combinations result in the United States playing Group I, and 64 result in the United States playing Group J.So it is no wonder that many believe that ultimately, the United States will play the third-place team from Group B, which could come down to the winner of Wednesday’s match between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Qatar.Another way to look at the scenarios? According to the experts at Expecting Goals, there is a 60% chance that the United States plays Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Round of 32, and a 17% chance the United States plays Qatar:Senegal and Ecuador round out the options, with Senegal at 6% and Ecuador at 4%.We will know for sure in a few days.Update: Following Monday night’s late match between Jordan and Algeria, Algeria has moved into third place in Group J, changing the matrix. As a result, as of Tuesday, June 23, the opponent for the United States in the Round of 32 would be … Algeria.Again, this likely changes over the next few days. Stay tuned.  #play #knockout #World #Cup

If you look down to the bottom-left quadrant of this bracket, you will see where the United States will be slotted in when the Round of 32 is finalized. As the winners of Group D, they will slide into that “1D” spot, and play a third place team from Group B, E, F, I, or J.

With the expansion of the World Cup to 48 teams, the top two teams from each group advance to the Round of 32, plus the eight best third-place teams. More on that in a moment.

Who are the potential opponents for the US?

So, who might the United States see in the Round of 32?

Here are the teams in each potential group. For more on each group, you can visit the link, which takes you to the full standings and knockout-round scenarios for each of those groups.

  • Group B: Canada, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Qatar, and Switzerland
  • Group E: Germany, Curaçao, Ivory Coast, and Ecuador
  • Group F: Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, and Tunisia (Note, Tunisia has already been eliminated from knockout round contention)
  • Group I: France, Senegal, Norway, and Iraq
  • Group J: Argentina, Algeria, Austria, and Jordan

As of publication, these are the third-place teams in each of those groups: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ecuador, Sweden, Senegal, and Jordan. However, only Ecuador and Sweden. However, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Senegal, and Jordan are not among the eight best third-place teams, so if the Round of 32 began today, the options for the United States would be down to Ecuador or Sweden. More on that in a second.

You can read more about the ranking of the third-place teams here, where we are updating the third-place standings after each match.

Prior to the World Cup, FIFA published Annex C to the FIFA Rules and Regulations, which outlines the 495 possible combinations for the third-place teams. That matrix, and those 495 possible combinations, dictate the matches involving the third-place teams.

At the time of publication, with Groups B, I, J, and L sitting at the bottom of the third-place standings, that combination is found in Annex C as combination 283. In that scenario, the United States would play … the third-place team from Group E.

Which right now is Ecuador.

Another good method of visualizing these combinations comes courtesy of Wikipedia.

So for the moment, the United States is set to take on Ecuador. But as the third-place standings shift, the combination will change, the matrix will be adjusted, and we will offer the updates accordingly.

In looking at the 495 possible combinations, it should be noted that 329 of those result in the United States playing Group B, 39 combinations result in the United States playing Group E, 11 combinations result in the United States playing Group F, 52 combinations result in the United States playing Group I, and 64 result in the United States playing Group J.

So it is no wonder that many believe that ultimately, the United States will play the third-place team from Group B, which could come down to the winner of Wednesday’s match between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Qatar.

Another way to look at the scenarios? According to the experts at Expecting Goals, there is a 60% chance that the United States plays Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Round of 32, and a 17% chance the United States plays Qatar:

Senegal and Ecuador round out the options, with Senegal at 6% and Ecuador at 4%.

We will know for sure in a few days.

Update: Following Monday night’s late match between Jordan and Algeria, Algeria has moved into third place in Group J, changing the matrix. As a result, as of Tuesday, June 23, the opponent for the United States in the Round of 32 would be … Algeria.

Again, this likely changes over the next few days. Stay tuned.

#play #knockout #World #Cup">Who will the US play in the knockout round of the World Cup?

By winning Group D, the United States has already booked a spot in the Round of 32 at the 2026 World Cup.

So who will they play in the knockout round?

That … is a complicated question. A complicated question that involves brackets, Annex C of the FIFA Rules and Regulations, a matrix, and 495 potential combinations of the eight third-place teams advancing out of group play and into the knockout round.

So, let’s try to answer that question the best we can, starting with the World Cup bracket itself.

Wednesday could be pivotal for the United States at the 2026 World Cup. While the USMNT is not playing today, Wednesday is the final day of matches in Group B. Read on to see why that could determine who the United States plays in the Round of 32.

Update: And with Bosnia and Herzegovina clinching third in Group B, while it is not set in stone, they are the most likely opponent for the United States in the Round of 32. Read on for why.

The 2026 World Cup bracket

Let’s start here, with this World Cup bracket courtesy of USA Today.

If you look down to the bottom-left quadrant of this bracket, you will see where the United States will be slotted in when the Round of 32 is finalized. As the winners of Group D, they will slide into that “1D” spot, and play a third place team from Group B, E, F, I, or J.

With the expansion of the World Cup to 48 teams, the top two teams from each group advance to the Round of 32, plus the eight best third-place teams. More on that in a moment.

Who are the potential opponents for the US?

So, who might the United States see in the Round of 32?

Here are the teams in each potential group. For more on each group, you can visit the link, which takes you to the full standings and knockout-round scenarios for each of those groups.

  • Group B: Canada, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Qatar, and Switzerland
  • Group E: Germany, Curaçao, Ivory Coast, and Ecuador
  • Group F: Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, and Tunisia (Note, Tunisia has already been eliminated from knockout round contention)
  • Group I: France, Senegal, Norway, and Iraq
  • Group J: Argentina, Algeria, Austria, and Jordan

As of publication, these are the third-place teams in each of those groups: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ecuador, Sweden, Senegal, and Jordan. However, only Ecuador and Sweden. However, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Senegal, and Jordan are not among the eight best third-place teams, so if the Round of 32 began today, the options for the United States would be down to Ecuador or Sweden. More on that in a second.

You can read more about the ranking of the third-place teams here, where we are updating the third-place standings after each match.

Prior to the World Cup, FIFA published Annex C to the FIFA Rules and Regulations, which outlines the 495 possible combinations for the third-place teams. That matrix, and those 495 possible combinations, dictate the matches involving the third-place teams.

At the time of publication, with Groups B, I, J, and L sitting at the bottom of the third-place standings, that combination is found in Annex C as combination 283. In that scenario, the United States would play … the third-place team from Group E.

Which right now is Ecuador.

Another good method of visualizing these combinations comes courtesy of Wikipedia.

So for the moment, the United States is set to take on Ecuador. But as the third-place standings shift, the combination will change, the matrix will be adjusted, and we will offer the updates accordingly.

In looking at the 495 possible combinations, it should be noted that 329 of those result in the United States playing Group B, 39 combinations result in the United States playing Group E, 11 combinations result in the United States playing Group F, 52 combinations result in the United States playing Group I, and 64 result in the United States playing Group J.

So it is no wonder that many believe that ultimately, the United States will play the third-place team from Group B, which could come down to the winner of Wednesday’s match between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Qatar.

Another way to look at the scenarios? According to the experts at Expecting Goals, there is a 60% chance that the United States plays Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Round of 32, and a 17% chance the United States plays Qatar:

Senegal and Ecuador round out the options, with Senegal at 6% and Ecuador at 4%.

We will know for sure in a few days.

Update: Following Monday night’s late match between Jordan and Algeria, Algeria has moved into third place in Group J, changing the matrix. As a result, as of Tuesday, June 23, the opponent for the United States in the Round of 32 would be … Algeria.

Again, this likely changes over the next few days. Stay tuned.

#play #knockout #World #Cup

Catch the live score and updates from FIFA World Cup 2026 match | Photo Credit: Reuters

ുധനാഴ്ച സിയാറ്റിലിൽ നടക്കുന്ന ബോസ്നിയയും ഹെർസഗോവിനയും ഖത്തറും തമ്മിലുള്ള ഫിഫ ലോകകപ്പ് 2026 ഗ്രൂപ്പ് ബി മത്സരത്തിന്റെ സ്‌പോർട്‌സ്റ്റാറിന്റെ തത്സമയ സംപ്രേക്ഷണത്തിലേക്ക് സ്വാഗതം

#ബസനയയ #ഹർസഗവനയ #ഖതതർ #ലവ #ഫഫ #ലകകപപ #BHI #QAT #തതസമയ #അപഡററകൾ #പകത #സമയതതന #മമപ #ഖതതർ #കമമ #കറചച">ബോസ്നിയയും ഹെർസഗോവിനയും ഖത്തർ ലൈവ് | ഫിഫ ലോകകപ്പ് 2026: BHI 2-1 QAT തത്സമയ അപ്‌ഡേറ്റുകൾ; പകുതി സമയത്തിന് മുമ്പ് ഖത്തർ കമ്മി കുറച്ചു  Catch the live score and updates from FIFA World Cup 2026 match 
                                                                          | Photo Credit:  
                                      Reuters
                                                                      
                        Catch the live score and updates from FIFA World Cup 2026 match
                                                  | Photo Credit:  
                          Reuters
                                              ുധനാഴ്ച സിയാറ്റിലിൽ നടക്കുന്ന ബോസ്നിയയും ഹെർസഗോവിനയും ഖത്തറും തമ്മിലുള്ള ഫിഫ ലോകകപ്പ് 2026 ഗ്രൂപ്പ് ബി മത്സരത്തിന്റെ സ്‌പോർട്‌സ്റ്റാറിന്റെ തത്സമയ സംപ്രേക്ഷണത്തിലേക്ക് സ്വാഗതം  #ബസനയയ #ഹർസഗവനയ #ഖതതർ #ലവ #ഫഫ #ലകകപപ #BHI #QAT #തതസമയ #അപഡററകൾ #പകത #സമയതതന #മമപ #ഖതതർ #കമമ #കറചച

Post Comment