What happens when the world is filled with humanoid robots? If you believe Elon Musk, the answer is you get a technological utopia where humans no longer have to work and get paid to lounge around. And if you know anything about 20th-century futurism, you’ve probably heard that one before.
Musk has a long history of talking bullshit. The Tesla CEO makes lofty promises about the future that he can’t keep. And one of those promises is that sometime in the future, robots will be doing all your labor, freeing up humans to get handouts from the government.
The conversation started on Saturday, when an X user predicted that “By 2030, all jobs will be replaced by AI and robots. Easily.” The user insisted that since the U.S. has about 170 million workers, and 80 million of those jobs “include hands-on work,” the number of robots to replace all human workers was something close to “20 million autonomous systems – including autonomous vehicles, automated equipment, and robots.”
Musk replied that while he believed the calculations were correct, there would be a lot more robots than people in the future.
“Your estimates are about right. However, intelligent robots in humanoid form will far exceed the population of humans, as every person will want their own personal R2-D2 and C-3PO. And then there will be many robots in industry for every human to provide products & services,” Musk tweeted.
And then things got interesting. As well as ridiculous. Someone else replied to ask Musk, “When robots replace working people, how will those who become unemployed sustain their lives?”
The billionaire insisted everyone would benefit from getting free handouts without having to work. “There will be universal high income (not merely basic income). Everyone will have the best medical care, food, home, transport and everything else,” Musk wrote.
His comments would be hilarious if they weren’t such a brazen lie. And one that some extremely gullible people probably believe.
Musk is the guy who took a chainsaw to the federal government in an effort to make sure supposedly “undeserving” people are unable to get any government benefits. There’s nothing worse in a given society than people who contribute nothing and get all of life’s necessities, according to the Musk worldview. Why on Earth would we believe that he wants everyone to get a guaranteed income for doing nothing while robots do all the real work? And who’s going to administer this system? How is it maintained and, perhaps most importantly, who owns the robots?
Tesla has a lot to gain from the idea that robots will be plentiful in the future. Musk makes the Optimus robot, a humanoid automaton that he says will be manufactured not just in the millions, but in the billions one day. Optimus is way behind competitors made by companies like Figure, but he insists that one day the Tesla bot will be babysitting your kids.
If you’re at all familiar with the promises of automation in the 1950s, ’60s, and ’70s, the idea that robots would do all the work is very familiar. Some very smart people believed it was inevitable that automation would advance in such a way that a new leisure society would emerge. And while robots are certainly on the way and will be more common in the future, the promises for what that means for society have never panned out.
Walter Cronkite, a legendary journalist who was well-trusted by the American public, told CBS viewers in 1967 that robot housemaids and tremendous advances in automation were going to make life so much easier.
“Technology is opening a new world of leisure time,” Cronkite said. “One government report projects that by the year 2000, the United States will have a 30-hour work week and month-long vacations as the rule.” Cronkite was far from some radical socialist weirdo. But just about everyone took it for granted that things would only get better and everyone would work less, if at all.
And working less would cause its own problems. Parade magazine published an article in the January 4, 1959 issue titled, “Will Robots Make People Obsolete?” And it painted a very bleak future for humanity when robots were everywhere. Yes, all the work would be done for us, but humans wouldn’t find any purpose in life anymore:
Mankind’s major struggle will be against boredom, with the suicide rate zooming as people lose the race. Governments and family life will wither away. Public officials will be replaced by Board of Supervisors to “umpire” games, sports and recreation, and also administer competitive exams which would decide who could work at the few essential jobs left for human beings to do. Fantastic? Certainly, by our everyday standards of progress. But every one of these dizzying pictures of life in the future could conceivably become real – when and if man creates robots to do his work for him.
The idea is even older than the mid-20th century, even if that’s the era that gets the most attention thanks to popular media like The Jetsons TV show from the early 1960s. George Jetson worked a mere three hours each day and still enjoyed a life that humans of 2025 could only dream of.
There has also been the flip side of the argument, that robots would bring death and destruction. Back in the 1930s, with automation truly a threat during tough economic times, humanoid robots were depicted as incredibly scary. Not only would they be taking your job, they’d be boozing it up and assaulting women. But when times are better, which is to say not the Great Depression, technologists love to push robots as our saviors.
Musk is selling an idea that’s been around for a very long time. Robots doing all of our work has been a promise for generations at this point. But when Musk adds the promise of a universal income, he’s really doubling down on absurdity.
Source link
#Elon #Musks #Ridiculous #Lie

![Scientists Say Some Black Holes Are Born From Other Black Holes
Since LIGO’s Nobel-winning discovery of gravitational waves—ripples in spacetime—the U.S.-based detector has been picking up on hundreds of signals from black hole mergers. And, after a decade of studying gravitational waves, researchers believe a significant fraction of black holes may come from cosmic chain reactions. A recent paper published in Physical Review Letters describes an analysis of 155 pairs of binary black holes, identified by LIGO and its sisters, Virgo and KAGRA, in Italy and Japan, respectively. According to the study, about 14% of merging black holes may be what’s called “second-generation black holes,” or black holes that form from previous mergers of two smaller black holes. This “hierarchical” backstory is vastly different from the textbook version of how black holes emerge from the explosive death of a star. “Overall in the universe, black holes are merging all the time,” Cailin Plunkett, the study’s first author and a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told MIT News. “Now we’re seeing a relatively consistent picture where there’s a decent percentage of black holes that are coming from this repeated pathway.”
Tracking the invisible Gravitational waves that reach Earth’s detectors typically come from extremely intense events. Over the years, LIGO has picked up some truly perplexing signals. For example, last summer it found the most colossal black hole merger ever—and if that wasn’t wild enough, the black holes that took part in the merger lie within a cosmic “dead zone” for black holes.
This zone refers to a range of black hole masses in which, physically speaking, black holes can’t form through ordinary stellar collapse. From these discoveries, astronomers realized just how little we knew about black holes, which are challenging to investigate directly. In that sense, it was a no-brainer that the ever-growing catalog of LIGO’s gravitational signals would turn up entirely new insights about black holes. “It is increasingly clear, both from individual events and population analyses, that massive black holes exist in [this] range,” the researchers wrote in the latest paper. “These observations have spurred further investigation into mechanisms that can populate this gap.”
A wobbly imprint The latest research represents one such investigation. During mergers, the two black holes spiral toward each other along an orbital plane. When one or both black hole spins are misaligned, the orbital plane can wobble, or “precess,” the researchers explained to MIT News. The degree to which the disk wobbles acts as a parameter from which researchers can measure the masses and spins of the merging black holes. One telling sign of hierarchical mergers is that they’re “lopsided,” meaning one of the pair has a much higher spin and mass than the other. For the study, the team created an analytic model to capture the kind of wobble that would have emerged from second-generation black holes. Around 14% of merging black holes followed this pattern, and the second-generation black holes identified had a very specific range of masses, at around 20 solar masses or 40 solar masses and above. Of mysterious origins To be fair, that might not sound like a whole lot. But it demonstrates that a sizeable portion of known black holes indeed follow this pattern. As for why, the team suspects hierarchical mergers emerge from dense stellar environments. Simply, when multiple neighboring stars die and collapse into black holes, the dense environment can make it easier for those black holes to find each other and merge. That could further lead to the formation of second-generation black holes. Theoretically, this could “repeat potentially ad infinitum, by virtue of the fact that you have a ton of stars and black holes in this really dense environment,” Plunkett said.
But an ensuing mystery concerns those black holes in the 40-and-above regime, which coincides with the aforementioned “death zones” for black hole masses. According to stellar evolution theory, black holes born of supernovas shouldn’t leave any black holes above roughly 45 solar masses, explained Plunkett. “Yet we have seen black holes that are that massive,” she mused. “And the question is: Where did they come from?” For now, it’s hard to say when we’ll get an answer to that question, if ever. But one thing seems to be clear: black holes are a lot weirder than we could ever imagine. #Scientists #Black #Holes #Born #Black #HolesBlack holes,Gravitational wave,LIGO Scientists Say Some Black Holes Are Born From Other Black Holes
Since LIGO’s Nobel-winning discovery of gravitational waves—ripples in spacetime—the U.S.-based detector has been picking up on hundreds of signals from black hole mergers. And, after a decade of studying gravitational waves, researchers believe a significant fraction of black holes may come from cosmic chain reactions. A recent paper published in Physical Review Letters describes an analysis of 155 pairs of binary black holes, identified by LIGO and its sisters, Virgo and KAGRA, in Italy and Japan, respectively. According to the study, about 14% of merging black holes may be what’s called “second-generation black holes,” or black holes that form from previous mergers of two smaller black holes. This “hierarchical” backstory is vastly different from the textbook version of how black holes emerge from the explosive death of a star. “Overall in the universe, black holes are merging all the time,” Cailin Plunkett, the study’s first author and a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told MIT News. “Now we’re seeing a relatively consistent picture where there’s a decent percentage of black holes that are coming from this repeated pathway.”
Tracking the invisible Gravitational waves that reach Earth’s detectors typically come from extremely intense events. Over the years, LIGO has picked up some truly perplexing signals. For example, last summer it found the most colossal black hole merger ever—and if that wasn’t wild enough, the black holes that took part in the merger lie within a cosmic “dead zone” for black holes.
This zone refers to a range of black hole masses in which, physically speaking, black holes can’t form through ordinary stellar collapse. From these discoveries, astronomers realized just how little we knew about black holes, which are challenging to investigate directly. In that sense, it was a no-brainer that the ever-growing catalog of LIGO’s gravitational signals would turn up entirely new insights about black holes. “It is increasingly clear, both from individual events and population analyses, that massive black holes exist in [this] range,” the researchers wrote in the latest paper. “These observations have spurred further investigation into mechanisms that can populate this gap.”
A wobbly imprint The latest research represents one such investigation. During mergers, the two black holes spiral toward each other along an orbital plane. When one or both black hole spins are misaligned, the orbital plane can wobble, or “precess,” the researchers explained to MIT News. The degree to which the disk wobbles acts as a parameter from which researchers can measure the masses and spins of the merging black holes. One telling sign of hierarchical mergers is that they’re “lopsided,” meaning one of the pair has a much higher spin and mass than the other. For the study, the team created an analytic model to capture the kind of wobble that would have emerged from second-generation black holes. Around 14% of merging black holes followed this pattern, and the second-generation black holes identified had a very specific range of masses, at around 20 solar masses or 40 solar masses and above. Of mysterious origins To be fair, that might not sound like a whole lot. But it demonstrates that a sizeable portion of known black holes indeed follow this pattern. As for why, the team suspects hierarchical mergers emerge from dense stellar environments. Simply, when multiple neighboring stars die and collapse into black holes, the dense environment can make it easier for those black holes to find each other and merge. That could further lead to the formation of second-generation black holes. Theoretically, this could “repeat potentially ad infinitum, by virtue of the fact that you have a ton of stars and black holes in this really dense environment,” Plunkett said.
But an ensuing mystery concerns those black holes in the 40-and-above regime, which coincides with the aforementioned “death zones” for black hole masses. According to stellar evolution theory, black holes born of supernovas shouldn’t leave any black holes above roughly 45 solar masses, explained Plunkett. “Yet we have seen black holes that are that massive,” she mused. “And the question is: Where did they come from?” For now, it’s hard to say when we’ll get an answer to that question, if ever. But one thing seems to be clear: black holes are a lot weirder than we could ever imagine. #Scientists #Black #Holes #Born #Black #HolesBlack holes,Gravitational wave,LIGO](https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/07/black-hole-hierarchial-mergers-1280x853.jpg)
Post Comment