×
Lelo’s Sona 3 Cruise Vibrator Doesn’t Offer Much New

Lelo’s Sona 3 Cruise Vibrator Doesn’t Offer Much New

Tech-news , , , ,

One of my biggest gripes about the sex toy industry—and the tech industry for that matter—is that there’s a lot of iteration. New versions of already great products arrive every few years, with very minor changes, and you’re left wondering what the latest brings to the table outside of a higher price. Many sex toy brands are guilty of this, from Womanizer and We-Vibe to Dame.

Lelo’s new Sona 3 Cruise falls into this camp as well, even if its predecessor arrived five years ago. This vibrator doesn’t bring much new to the table. For anyone who’s a fan of the Sona line and feels their existing model is failing in some way—maybe the battery is conking out, or it doesn’t charge properly—the Sona 3 Cruise is a natural upgrade. Or you could save cash and stick with the older tried-and-true Sona 2 Cruise.

Minimal Changes

Courtesy of Lelo

Like its predecessors, the Sona 3 Cruise is made of body-safe silicone and ABS plastic. It’s ultra-smooth to touch, and when paired with water-based lube, it glides over whatever area you’re stimulating. Fun fact: The Sona line may have been designed with the clitoris in mind, but if you like nipple stimulation, it feels wonderful there too.

When fully charged, which takes about two hours, the Sona 3 can deliver two hours of run time. That’s in line with most Lelo products. Similarly, the device is 100 percent waterproof and features the company’s Cruise Control function (it’s in the name!), so when you press the vibrator down harder on your body as you get close to climax, the motors don’t slow down but actually offer a bit of a boost.

The only “big” difference with the Sona 3 Cruise is in the vibration settings. The original Sona Cruise had eight, the Sona 2 Cruise had 12, and the Sona 3 Cruise bumps that up to 16. I’m no Nostradamus, but if Lelo releases a Sona 4 Cruise, I’m willing to bet it will have 20 vibration settings. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it—I know, but it’s OK to shake things up a bit. There doesn’t seem to be much here to warrant a whole new product.

Oh, and the Sona 3 is app-controlled, a standard feature on most Lelo products today, and it enables long-distance play. If you’re using the app solo, not only do you have the intensities and patterns to choose from on your phone, but you can also adjust the intensity by rotating the phone. If you want to delve into advanced mode, you can let the Sona 3 take over by choosing one of the following options: Out of Control or Finish Me Off. For the record, Out of Control is exactly that. It bounces all around with intensities and patterns, and how anyone could find such mayhem enjoyable is beyond me.

The Sona 3 debuts what Lelo calls SmoothRise Technology, meant to create a smooth transition between intensity levels. I’ve always felt like older Sona Cruise products moved fairly seamlessly from one intensity to the next, so I’m not exactly sure what the latest generation is doing differently. Annoyingly, the vibrator’s charger is still proprietary. Is it so hard to add a USB-C port?

Underwhelming Update

Image may contain Clothing Footwear Shoe Hat High Heel Smoke Pipe Cushion and Home Decor

Courtesy of Lelo

I’ve always liked the Lelo Sona line quite a bit. I can’t say I was disappointed with the Sona 3 Cruise, but it didn’t leave me with a memorable experience. The sonic pulses feel good, the extra intensities are nice ot have, but I’m not running around town recommending this vibrator to everyone I meet. The Lelo Dot, on the other hand, is a whole other story. I can’t stop talking about that clitoral vibrator; it’s going to ruin me for everything else that comes my way.

If you’re a big fan of the Lelo Sona Cruise line and have been waiting for it to be app-controlled, then the Sona 3 is for you. If you’ve felt that the older models weren’t intense enough, then that’s another good reason to buy the Sona 3. But if you already have a Lelo Sona Cruise, whether it’s the original or Sona 2, and you love it, there’s no need to upgrade, especially if it gets the job done. Save your money or invest it in something new and exciting. You know, like the Lelo Dot.

Source link
#Lelos #Sona #Cruise #Vibrator #Doesnt #Offer

Tag

Related Posts

AI’s biggest champions have argued for some time that the technology will usher in an era of unprecedented productivity gains, richly rewarding workers who harness it while displacing those who don’t.

Zeb Evans, CEO of the collaboration software startup ClickUp, claims that this shift is imminent. Last Thursday, Evans announced on X that the company, which was last valued in 2021 at $4 billion, had laid off 22% of its workforce yet characterized that reduction as not a cost-cutting measure, but rather a radical embrace of AI that will propel the company to the next level.

“Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We’ll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you’ll be paid outside of traditional bands,” Evans wrote.

ClickUp recently introduced roughly 3,000 internal AI agents to handle a wide range of complex tasks on behalf of its employees, according to a Fortune article published several days ago. Instead of performing the work themselves, staff members are now expected to direct these agents and ultimately review the output to ensure it meets the company’s standards.

Evans’s goal, according to his X post, is for AI to turbocharge ClickUp into a “100x org.”  

ClickUp is not alone in its hope that AI agents will provide massive productivity gains.

In fact, according to a recent Gartner survey, about 80% of companies using autonomous tech have cut jobs. However, the study found that workforce reductions aren’t necessarily translating into meaningful financial returns.

While Gartner’s findings suggest some companies use unproven AI as an excuse to downsize, ClickUp maintains it is not one of them.

Evans told TechCrunch via email that the startup is indeed seeing productivity gains from AI agents. Not only is ClickUp measuring those efficiencies internally, but it’s also apparently gearing up to include them in a forthcoming product for its customers.   

“Instead of gamifying token cost, we gamify value created and time saved,” Evans wrote.

In recent months, a growing number of companies have started monitoring employee token consumption, using it as a metric to see who is actually adopting AI tools. But critics argue that “tokenmaxxing”—as this concept is known—is the wrong metric because it simply racks up AI expenses.

“The people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job,” Evans claimed in his post. But if AI keeps taking over more tasks, ClickUp will eventually need fewer and fewer people, eliminating those who fail to automate their functions well.

Tech circles have long theorized about this scenario.

One extreme example of a high-profile startup using AI automation to the max already exists. Polsia, a one-year-old startup that claims to handle all software operations for solopreneurs, is run by just one person: its founder and CEO, Ben Broca. That efficiency is apparently paying off: Polsia just raised $30 million at a $250 million valuation.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#ClickUps #mass #layoff #tells #future #work #TechCrunchlayoff,ClickUp">What ClickUp’s mass layoff tells us about the future of work | TechCrunch AI’s biggest champions have argued for some time that the technology will usher in an era of unprecedented productivity gains, richly rewarding workers who harness it while displacing those who don’t. Zeb Evans, CEO of the collaboration software startup ClickUp, claims that this shift is imminent. Last Thursday, Evans announced on X that the company, which was last valued in 2021 at billion, had laid off 22% of its workforce yet characterized that reduction as not a cost-cutting measure, but rather a radical embrace of AI that will propel the company to the next level. “Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We’ll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you’ll be paid outside of traditional bands,” Evans wrote. ClickUp recently introduced roughly 3,000 internal AI agents to handle a wide range of complex tasks on behalf of its employees, according to a Fortune article published several days ago. Instead of performing the work themselves, staff members are now expected to direct these agents and ultimately review the output to ensure it meets the company’s standards. Evans’s goal, according to his X post, is for AI to turbocharge ClickUp into a “100x org.”   ClickUp is not alone in its hope that AI agents will provide massive productivity gains. In fact, according to a recent Gartner survey, about 80% of companies using autonomous tech have cut jobs. However, the study found that workforce reductions aren’t necessarily translating into meaningful financial returns. While Gartner’s findings suggest some companies use unproven AI as an excuse to downsize, ClickUp maintains it is not one of them. Evans told TechCrunch via email that the startup is indeed seeing productivity gains from AI agents. Not only is ClickUp measuring those efficiencies internally, but it’s also apparently gearing up to include them in a forthcoming product for its customers.    “Instead of gamifying token cost, we gamify value created and time saved,” Evans wrote. In recent months, a growing number of companies have started monitoring employee token consumption, using it as a metric to see who is actually adopting AI tools. But critics argue that “tokenmaxxing”—as this concept is known—is the wrong metric because it simply racks up AI expenses. “The people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job,” Evans claimed in his post. But if AI keeps taking over more tasks, ClickUp will eventually need fewer and fewer people, eliminating those who fail to automate their functions well. Tech circles have long theorized about this scenario. One extreme example of a high-profile startup using AI automation to the max already exists. Polsia, a one-year-old startup that claims to handle all software operations for solopreneurs, is run by just one person: its founder and CEO, Ben Broca. That efficiency is apparently paying off: Polsia just raised million at a 0 million valuation. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#ClickUps #mass #layoff #tells #future #work #TechCrunchlayoff,ClickUp

announced on X that the company, which was last valued in 2021 at $4 billion, had laid off 22% of its workforce yet characterized that reduction as not a cost-cutting measure, but rather a radical embrace of AI that will propel the company to the next level.

“Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We’ll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you’ll be paid outside of traditional bands,” Evans wrote.

ClickUp recently introduced roughly 3,000 internal AI agents to handle a wide range of complex tasks on behalf of its employees, according to a Fortune article published several days ago. Instead of performing the work themselves, staff members are now expected to direct these agents and ultimately review the output to ensure it meets the company’s standards.

Evans’s goal, according to his X post, is for AI to turbocharge ClickUp into a “100x org.”  

ClickUp is not alone in its hope that AI agents will provide massive productivity gains.

In fact, according to a recent Gartner survey, about 80% of companies using autonomous tech have cut jobs. However, the study found that workforce reductions aren’t necessarily translating into meaningful financial returns.

While Gartner’s findings suggest some companies use unproven AI as an excuse to downsize, ClickUp maintains it is not one of them.

Evans told TechCrunch via email that the startup is indeed seeing productivity gains from AI agents. Not only is ClickUp measuring those efficiencies internally, but it’s also apparently gearing up to include them in a forthcoming product for its customers.   

“Instead of gamifying token cost, we gamify value created and time saved,” Evans wrote.

In recent months, a growing number of companies have started monitoring employee token consumption, using it as a metric to see who is actually adopting AI tools. But critics argue that “tokenmaxxing”—as this concept is known—is the wrong metric because it simply racks up AI expenses.

“The people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job,” Evans claimed in his post. But if AI keeps taking over more tasks, ClickUp will eventually need fewer and fewer people, eliminating those who fail to automate their functions well.

Tech circles have long theorized about this scenario.

One extreme example of a high-profile startup using AI automation to the max already exists. Polsia, a one-year-old startup that claims to handle all software operations for solopreneurs, is run by just one person: its founder and CEO, Ben Broca. That efficiency is apparently paying off: Polsia just raised $30 million at a $250 million valuation.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#ClickUps #mass #layoff #tells #future #work #TechCrunchlayoff,ClickUp">What ClickUp’s mass layoff tells us about the future of work | TechCrunch

AI’s biggest champions have argued for some time that the technology will usher in an era of unprecedented productivity gains, richly rewarding workers who harness it while displacing those who don’t.

Zeb Evans, CEO of the collaboration software startup ClickUp, claims that this shift is imminent. Last Thursday, Evans announced on X that the company, which was last valued in 2021 at $4 billion, had laid off 22% of its workforce yet characterized that reduction as not a cost-cutting measure, but rather a radical embrace of AI that will propel the company to the next level.

“Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We’ll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you’ll be paid outside of traditional bands,” Evans wrote.

ClickUp recently introduced roughly 3,000 internal AI agents to handle a wide range of complex tasks on behalf of its employees, according to a Fortune article published several days ago. Instead of performing the work themselves, staff members are now expected to direct these agents and ultimately review the output to ensure it meets the company’s standards.

Evans’s goal, according to his X post, is for AI to turbocharge ClickUp into a “100x org.”  

ClickUp is not alone in its hope that AI agents will provide massive productivity gains.

In fact, according to a recent Gartner survey, about 80% of companies using autonomous tech have cut jobs. However, the study found that workforce reductions aren’t necessarily translating into meaningful financial returns.

While Gartner’s findings suggest some companies use unproven AI as an excuse to downsize, ClickUp maintains it is not one of them.

Evans told TechCrunch via email that the startup is indeed seeing productivity gains from AI agents. Not only is ClickUp measuring those efficiencies internally, but it’s also apparently gearing up to include them in a forthcoming product for its customers.   

“Instead of gamifying token cost, we gamify value created and time saved,” Evans wrote.

In recent months, a growing number of companies have started monitoring employee token consumption, using it as a metric to see who is actually adopting AI tools. But critics argue that “tokenmaxxing”—as this concept is known—is the wrong metric because it simply racks up AI expenses.

“The people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job,” Evans claimed in his post. But if AI keeps taking over more tasks, ClickUp will eventually need fewer and fewer people, eliminating those who fail to automate their functions well.

Tech circles have long theorized about this scenario.

One extreme example of a high-profile startup using AI automation to the max already exists. Polsia, a one-year-old startup that claims to handle all software operations for solopreneurs, is run by just one person: its founder and CEO, Ben Broca. That efficiency is apparently paying off: Polsia just raised $30 million at a $250 million valuation.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#ClickUps #mass #layoff #tells #future #work #TechCrunchlayoff,ClickUp
VM441 AiO, which is designed to offer a smarter desktop experience by combining the Snapdragon X platform with Microsoft’s Copilot+ PC features. In simpler terms, ASUS wants this to feel less like a traditional bulky desktop and more like a modern AI-first machine for everyday users.

ASUS VM441 AiO Features

The AiO delivers up to 45 TOPS of NPU performance for advanced functions on the device. The Copilot+ PC helps its users perform all their daily activities, multitask, and communicate during discussions and collaborations. The VM441 AiO comes with an impressive 24-inch full-HD touch-screen monitor with great aesthetics. The screen has a wide 178-degree viewing angle and 100% sRGB color coverage.

ASUS VM441 AiO comes with two 3W stereo speakers that feature Dolby Atmos technology for clear, immersive audio. The inclusion of a bass reflex system helps deliver clearer audio output while you stream content and participate in video conferencing sessions. It also features a 5 MP IR camera with Windows Hello technology.

ASUS has designed the device to provide a complete desktop package for everyday users. It comes with quick SSD storage options, free wireless accessories, and compatibility with productivity suite software. Buyers also receive a one-year Microsoft 365 Basic subscription with 100GB cloud storage access for files and backups.

Price and Availability

ASUS has priced the ASUS VM441 AiO starting at ₹1,01,990 for the 512GB model. The higher 1TB storage variant starts at ₹1,11,990. The desktop will be available across online and offline platforms, including Amazon, Flipkart, ASUS stores, and Croma. ASUS also includes No Cost EMI plans and cashback benefits on eligible bank cards.

#ASUS #VM441 #AiO #Launched #Snapdragon #Chip #Copilot #FeaturesAsus">ASUS VM441 AiO Launched With Snapdragon X Chip and Copilot+ Features AI PCs are quickly becoming the next big thing in the laptop world, but desktops haven’t seen the same level of attention yet. ASUS now wants to change that with the launch of the new VM441 AiO, which is designed to offer a smarter desktop experience by combining the Snapdragon X platform with Microsoft’s Copilot+ PC features. In simpler terms, ASUS wants this to feel less like a traditional bulky desktop and more like a modern AI-first machine for everyday users. ASUS VM441 AiO Features The AiO delivers up to 45 TOPS of NPU performance for advanced functions on the device. The Copilot+ PC helps its users perform all their daily activities, multitask, and communicate during discussions and collaborations. The VM441 AiO comes with an impressive 24-inch full-HD touch-screen monitor with great aesthetics. The screen has a wide 178-degree viewing angle and 100% sRGB color coverage. ASUS VM441 AiO comes with two 3W stereo speakers that feature Dolby Atmos technology for clear, immersive audio. The inclusion of a bass reflex system helps deliver clearer audio output while you stream content and participate in video conferencing sessions. It also features a 5 MP IR camera with Windows Hello technology. ASUS has designed the device to provide a complete desktop package for everyday users. It comes with quick SSD storage options, free wireless accessories, and compatibility with productivity suite software. Buyers also receive a one-year Microsoft 365 Basic subscription with 100GB cloud storage access for files and backups. Price and Availability ASUS has priced the ASUS VM441 AiO starting at ₹1,01,990 for the 512GB model. The higher 1TB storage variant starts at ₹1,11,990. The desktop will be available across online and offline platforms, including Amazon, Flipkart, ASUS stores, and Croma. ASUS also includes No Cost EMI plans and cashback benefits on eligible bank cards. #ASUS #VM441 #AiO #Launched #Snapdragon #Chip #Copilot #FeaturesAsus

, which is designed to offer a smarter desktop experience by combining the Snapdragon X platform with Microsoft’s Copilot+ PC features. In simpler terms, ASUS wants this to feel less like a traditional bulky desktop and more like a modern AI-first machine for everyday users.

ASUS VM441 AiO Features

The AiO delivers up to 45 TOPS of NPU performance for advanced functions on the device. The Copilot+ PC helps its users perform all their daily activities, multitask, and communicate during discussions and collaborations. The VM441 AiO comes with an impressive 24-inch full-HD touch-screen monitor with great aesthetics. The screen has a wide 178-degree viewing angle and 100% sRGB color coverage.

ASUS VM441 AiO comes with two 3W stereo speakers that feature Dolby Atmos technology for clear, immersive audio. The inclusion of a bass reflex system helps deliver clearer audio output while you stream content and participate in video conferencing sessions. It also features a 5 MP IR camera with Windows Hello technology.

ASUS has designed the device to provide a complete desktop package for everyday users. It comes with quick SSD storage options, free wireless accessories, and compatibility with productivity suite software. Buyers also receive a one-year Microsoft 365 Basic subscription with 100GB cloud storage access for files and backups.

Price and Availability

ASUS has priced the ASUS VM441 AiO starting at ₹1,01,990 for the 512GB model. The higher 1TB storage variant starts at ₹1,11,990. The desktop will be available across online and offline platforms, including Amazon, Flipkart, ASUS stores, and Croma. ASUS also includes No Cost EMI plans and cashback benefits on eligible bank cards.

#ASUS #VM441 #AiO #Launched #Snapdragon #Chip #Copilot #FeaturesAsus">ASUS VM441 AiO Launched With Snapdragon X Chip and Copilot+ Features

AI PCs are quickly becoming the next big thing in the laptop world, but desktops haven’t seen the same level of attention yet. ASUS now wants to change that with the launch of the new VM441 AiO, which is designed to offer a smarter desktop experience by combining the Snapdragon X platform with Microsoft’s Copilot+ PC features. In simpler terms, ASUS wants this to feel less like a traditional bulky desktop and more like a modern AI-first machine for everyday users.

ASUS VM441 AiO Features

The AiO delivers up to 45 TOPS of NPU performance for advanced functions on the device. The Copilot+ PC helps its users perform all their daily activities, multitask, and communicate during discussions and collaborations. The VM441 AiO comes with an impressive 24-inch full-HD touch-screen monitor with great aesthetics. The screen has a wide 178-degree viewing angle and 100% sRGB color coverage.

ASUS VM441 AiO comes with two 3W stereo speakers that feature Dolby Atmos technology for clear, immersive audio. The inclusion of a bass reflex system helps deliver clearer audio output while you stream content and participate in video conferencing sessions. It also features a 5 MP IR camera with Windows Hello technology.

ASUS has designed the device to provide a complete desktop package for everyday users. It comes with quick SSD storage options, free wireless accessories, and compatibility with productivity suite software. Buyers also receive a one-year Microsoft 365 Basic subscription with 100GB cloud storage access for files and backups.

Price and Availability

ASUS has priced the ASUS VM441 AiO starting at ₹1,01,990 for the 512GB model. The higher 1TB storage variant starts at ₹1,11,990. The desktop will be available across online and offline platforms, including Amazon, Flipkart, ASUS stores, and Croma. ASUS also includes No Cost EMI plans and cashback benefits on eligible bank cards.

#ASUS #VM441 #AiO #Launched #Snapdragon #Chip #Copilot #FeaturesAsus

There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself:

What could be better than this?

Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps).

I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?

Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.

As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this.

YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.

If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support.

As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway.

This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.

That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.

#John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper">John Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTube There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself: [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IQSvi3pXU[/embed] What could be better than this? Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps). I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this? Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer. As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this. YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times. If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support. As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway. This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening. That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to. #John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper

Libby, perhaps).

I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?

Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.

As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this.

YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.

If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support.

As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway.

This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.

That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.

#John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper">John Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTubeJohn Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTube There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself: [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IQSvi3pXU[/embed] What could be better than this? Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps). I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this? Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer. As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this. YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times. If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support. As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway. This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening. That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to. #John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper

There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself:

What could be better than this?

Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps).

I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?

Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.

As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this.

YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.

If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support.

As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway.

This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.

That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.

#John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper

Post Comment