×
The future of country music is here, and it’s AI

The future of country music is here, and it’s AI

When songwriter Patrick Irwin moved to Nashville last year, he was entering a lottery. Each day hundreds of sessions take place where writers create a song demo to pitch to a publisher. Publishers then share those songs with labels and managers, who may share those songs with the artists. Even if a major country star records (“cuts”) the song, it still takes a stroke of luck for that song to become a No. 1 hit.

The odds of winning are extremely low. Recently, Irwin was in a room where his cowriters Sam Fink and Duane Deerweater tried something new. Instead of booking studio time or calling a “track guy” to produce a demo, one cowriter opened Suno, an AI music platform, uploaded a voice memo with just guitar and vocals, and typed in a prompt: “traditional country, male vocal, folk country, story telling, 90s country, rhythmic.” Thirty seconds later he had two fully produced demos complete with drums, electric guitars, bass, and backing harmonies. There were no studio musicians, no invoices.

“You tell it the genre and it totally does the whole thing, it’s insane,” says Irwin. He was as astonished as he was disturbed. This was not the Nashville, a city with a storied 200-year history of producing much of America’s greatest music, that he had imagined.

Irwin isn’t alone in this feeling. In the background, AI is taking over the city. At the start of 2024, few professionals had even tried these tools, but in the past six months, songwriters and producers have embraced them to work faster and cheaper — and for some, more resourcefully. No label, no major publisher, nor Suno would give comment for this story. But after speaking with musicians, writers, and a dozen anonymous insiders, it’s clear that Nashville has become an AI town.

Original recording of “Hold On To You” by Patrick Irwin, Sam Fink, and Duane Deerweater:
“Hold On To You” remixed by Suno with the prompt: “Traditional country / male vocal / Folk country / Story telling / 90s country / rhythmic”

Songwriter Trannie Anderson — who’s written for Lainey Wilson, Dan + Shay, and Reba McEntire — says the tech is ubiquitous. Though she doesn’t use it herself, she sees wide use “from entry-level songwriters to the top dogs.” She isn’t exaggerating; multiple sources have told me that even stars like Dustin Lynch and Jelly Roll are being sent pitches with their voices artificially generated into demos, something AI voice transfer makes possible. Lynch’s manager Brad Belanger confirmed this, adding, “What a world we’re moving into.” Jelly Roll’s representatives declined to comment on the record.

The headlines might be focused on “Walk My Walk” by Breaking Rust, an AI song that recently topped the Billboard Country Digital Song Sales chart, but that story is largely smoke and mirrors. That chart is a holdover from the pre-streaming era and easily gamed. The real revolution isn’t on the charts yet — it’s happening in the writing rooms.

Nashville is known as a “10-year town,” reflecting the amount of time you have to grind it out before getting a hit. Even for established songwriters, it takes a long while between the original songwriting session and making it to country radio. “Two years is the fastest I’ve seen,” says Jon Sherwood, a UMPG writer who penned the Bailey Zimmerman and Luke Combs hit “Backup Plan.” Sherwood still writes the traditional way, sans AI, but he notes the speed is changing the game. In the past, writers would pen a song, then pay a “track guy” $500 to $1,000 to record a professional demo to pitch to stars.

Suno is creating efficiencies in the Nashville song assembly line. Songwriters still write the lyrics and melody because Suno’s generated lyrics are cloyingly cliche (though many of Nashville-based sources agreed that country radio hits can be too). They instead use the AI to handle the demo production. They record a voice memo, upload it, and use the “remix” feature to turn it into bro-country, alt-country, or “hick-hop” in seconds. Maggie Reaves, a rising songwriter signed to publishers Dream 3 and Kobalt, recently had an assignment for a major artist with a one-day turnaround, so she wrote the song and “threw it in Suno.” Her publisher told her, “This is perfect. This is going straight to her.”

Reaves writes an average of 200 songs a year. Demoing her songs can be prohibitively expensive. She used to save up money to demo songs for $500 each — demoing all her songs could hypothetically cost tens of thousands of dollars each year. Now, she pays $96 a year for near-infinite attempts: “I immediately saw this could replace that.”

A sample draft of a voice memo “Dirt Road” by Charlie Harding:
“Dirt Road” remixed by Suno with the prompt:
“Style:
Outlaw country with a driving half-time shuffle. Deep baritone male vocal with a laid-back but commanding delivery, similar to Waylon Jennings. Warm analog tone, slightly gritty.
Instrumentation:
Twangy Telecaster electric guitar with light overdrive, steady acoustic rhythm guitar, Fender bass with a tight, forward groove, brushed or lightly swung drums, subtle pedal steel swells, occasional baritone guitar riffs.
Vibe & Production:
70s Nashville outlaw sound — dry drums, wide but minimal reverb, punchy low end, guitars panned wide, vocals centered and intimate. Feel should be confident, cool, and unhurried.”
“Dirt Road” with additional lyrics written with specifically-prompted Claude, remixed by Suno with the prompt: “Style:
Warm, modern country with a blend of Southern soul and rootsy swagger. Strong, rich female vocal with plenty of character — earthy, expressive, and slightly smoky. Laid-back confidence with melodic phrasing that feels both classic and current.
Instrumentation:
Round, melodic bass; tight, steady drums with a hint of swampy groove; acoustic guitar strums; smooth electric guitar licks with light twang; occasional slide guitar or pedal steel for emotional lift; light organ pads underneath.
Production:
Polished but organic. Warm low end, clean guitars, vocals placed upfront with subtle grit, tasteful reverb for space but not gloss. Overall vibe should feel grounded, heartfelt, and radio-ready with a bit of a back-porch feel.
Mood:
Honest, soulful, confident storytelling — grounded in real experience, heart, and country charm.”

She’s not alone. Publishers are even running back catalogs through Suno to find new angles on forgotten tracks.

The sound isn’t perfect and can resemble an over-compressed, “dated” MP3: slightly lo-fi, not very dynamic, low sample rate and bit depth. But the uncanny valley of Suno songs is undeniably the voice, presenting with a slight grainy quality to the vocal that is overly pitch-corrected; the inflections are borderline Cylon. Yet Reaves says 70 percent of the output is solid enough to play in the car (traffic noise is enough to mask low-quality sound) and gives a clear picture of the finished song in order to pitch to an artist. These are demos, after all.

“You tell it the genre and it totally does the whole thing, it’s insane.”

Suno isn’t just useful as a demoing tool; it also helps producers rapidly brainstorm different creative approaches to a song or musical passage. Independent songwriter Kalen Nash usually produces songs the old way, in his studio, track by track, but recently has adopted Suno for creative inspiration; he calls it a “band in your pocket.” He’s used it to turn diary entries into full songs. Jacob Durrett, a Big Loud producer, uses it to find alternative versions and “vibes” for songs. He can put in a “half-cooked” idea for inspiration: Just a guitar idea scratch track is enough for Suno to output multiple melody and full song ideas in any genre imaginable.  “I’m in awe of it sometimes, how good it can be, you know?” He says that Suno is giving him “a productivity boost more than a creative boost.” As a skilled musician, he’s equally capable of trying a song out in any style — it just takes longer. His hope is that AI will take over the tedious parts of his job, like renaming files and preparing them to mix, so he can focus on the creative part.

Music publisher Eric Olson, who encourages writers to use the tool, calls it an “unlimited co-writer in the room.” He finds it useful for coming up with samples without the headache of clearances, or concerns that someone else has sampled the same part. For him, it’s about buying back time. “If I can give Suno the last 20 percent and spend more time with my kids, that’s huge,” he says.

It’s not all biscuits and gravy, though. Most people in Nashville wear multiple hats: songwriter, “track guy,” studio musician, touring guitarist. “There used to be a whole world where musicians were making six figures only playing demo scale,” says Ian Fitchuk, the Grammy-winning producer of Kacey Musgraves’ Golden Hour. Fitchuk has steered clear of Suno and worries about the musicians losing that income. Trannie Anderson calls it “the final nail in the coffin” for the demo studio system. If the “farm team” of demo players disappears, the industry might face a talent crisis down the road.

There are also legal and ethical headaches: “If Suno spits out a lead line an artist uses, what’s the protocol?” asks Reaves. The copyright office doesn’t protect AI work, which makes the ownership of these hybrid songs messy; plus, the AI was trained on existing music. “AI learns from my songs, my friends’ songs … We aren’t being compensated,” says Anderson. And there’s the “ick” factor. Durrett hates when the AI outputs a voice that sounds exactly like a friend of his. (He claims it’s happened many times.)

Despite the concerns, Suno just secured $250 million in funding, is making $200 million in annual revenue, and adoption is accelerating. Wait around two years and you’re going to hear songs made with the help of Suno all over country radio.

The question is how they will sound. Anderson hears that “there’s an element missing,” she says. “Humanity and a soul … The Holy Spirit doesn’t live in AI.”

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.


Source link
#future #country #music


There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself:

What could be better than this?

Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps).

I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?

Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.

As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this.

YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.

If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support.

As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway.

This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.

That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.

#John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper">John Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTube
                There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself: [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IQSvi3pXU[/embed] What could be better than this? Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps). I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?

 Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.

 As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this. YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.

 If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support. As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway. This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.

 That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.      #John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper

Libby, perhaps).

I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?

Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.

As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this.

YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.

If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support.

As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway.

This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.

That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.

#John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper">John Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTubeJohn Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTube
                There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself: [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IQSvi3pXU[/embed] What could be better than this? Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps). I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?

 Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.

 As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this. YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.

 If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support. As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway. This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.

 That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.      #John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper

There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself:

What could be better than this?

Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps).

I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?

Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.

As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this.

YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.

If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support.

As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway.

This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.

That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to.

#John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper

When you think of Memorial Day sales, you probably think of mattresses and other home goods. And while those items are definitely discounted, now is also a good time to purchase tech. Personally, I’m not buying anything right now unless it’s discounted—and fortunately many of our top picks are. Whether you’re shopping for a power bank, a new pair of headphones, or some other gadget, I’ve rounded up the best Memorial Day deals for your perusal. We’ll update this article again on Monday.

Check out our buying guides for more recommendations, including the best headphones, the best laptops, and the best cheap phones. You might also want to check out our additional Memorial Day deals coverage.

Updated May 24: We’ve checked prices, removed expired deals, added 5 new deals, and ensured accuracy throughout.

WIRED Featured Deals:

Sony WH-1000XM5 for $248 ($152 off)

Sony WH-1000MX5 headphones

The Sony WH-1000XM5 have a very frustrating name, but they’re the predecessor to our favorite wireless headphones, and they’re still an excellent pick if you don’t want to shell out for the new WH-1000XM6. They go on sale frequently, but rarely drop this low in price, which comes within $5 of their all-time low. If you’re in the market for over-ear headphones, they’re hard to beat. They’re comfortable, portable, lightweight, and stylish, and they’ll make your music sound great no matter what you like to listen to.

#Memorial #Day #Tech #Deals #Worth #Checkingshopping,deals,memorial day">The Best Memorial Day Tech Deals Worth Checking OutWhen you think of Memorial Day sales, you probably think of mattresses and other home goods. And while those items are definitely discounted, now is also a good time to purchase tech. Personally, I’m not buying anything right now unless it’s discounted—and fortunately many of our top picks are. Whether you’re shopping for a power bank, a new pair of headphones, or some other gadget, I’ve rounded up the best Memorial Day deals for your perusal. We’ll update this article again on Monday.Check out our buying guides for more recommendations, including the best headphones, the best laptops, and the best cheap phones. You might also want to check out our additional Memorial Day deals coverage.Updated May 24: We’ve checked prices, removed expired deals, added 5 new deals, and ensured accuracy throughout.WIRED Featured Deals:Sony WH-1000XM5 for 8 (2 off)The Sony WH-1000XM5 have a very frustrating name, but they’re the predecessor to our favorite wireless headphones, and they’re still an excellent pick if you don’t want to shell out for the new WH-1000XM6. They go on sale frequently, but rarely drop this low in price, which comes within  of their all-time low. If you’re in the market for over-ear headphones, they’re hard to beat. They’re comfortable, portable, lightweight, and stylish, and they’ll make your music sound great no matter what you like to listen to.#Memorial #Day #Tech #Deals #Worth #Checkingshopping,deals,memorial day

mattresses and other home goods. And while those items are definitely discounted, now is also a good time to purchase tech. Personally, I’m not buying anything right now unless it’s discounted—and fortunately many of our top picks are. Whether you’re shopping for a power bank, a new pair of headphones, or some other gadget, I’ve rounded up the best Memorial Day deals for your perusal. We’ll update this article again on Monday.

Check out our buying guides for more recommendations, including the best headphones, the best laptops, and the best cheap phones. You might also want to check out our additional Memorial Day deals coverage.

Updated May 24: We’ve checked prices, removed expired deals, added 5 new deals, and ensured accuracy throughout.

WIRED Featured Deals:

Sony WH-1000XM5 for $248 ($152 off)

Sony WH-1000MX5 headphones

The Sony WH-1000XM5 have a very frustrating name, but they’re the predecessor to our favorite wireless headphones, and they’re still an excellent pick if you don’t want to shell out for the new WH-1000XM6. They go on sale frequently, but rarely drop this low in price, which comes within $5 of their all-time low. If you’re in the market for over-ear headphones, they’re hard to beat. They’re comfortable, portable, lightweight, and stylish, and they’ll make your music sound great no matter what you like to listen to.

#Memorial #Day #Tech #Deals #Worth #Checkingshopping,deals,memorial day">The Best Memorial Day Tech Deals Worth Checking Out

When you think of Memorial Day sales, you probably think of mattresses and other home goods. And while those items are definitely discounted, now is also a good time to purchase tech. Personally, I’m not buying anything right now unless it’s discounted—and fortunately many of our top picks are. Whether you’re shopping for a power bank, a new pair of headphones, or some other gadget, I’ve rounded up the best Memorial Day deals for your perusal. We’ll update this article again on Monday.

Check out our buying guides for more recommendations, including the best headphones, the best laptops, and the best cheap phones. You might also want to check out our additional Memorial Day deals coverage.

Updated May 24: We’ve checked prices, removed expired deals, added 5 new deals, and ensured accuracy throughout.

WIRED Featured Deals:

Sony WH-1000XM5 for $248 ($152 off)

Sony WH-1000MX5 headphones

The Sony WH-1000XM5 have a very frustrating name, but they’re the predecessor to our favorite wireless headphones, and they’re still an excellent pick if you don’t want to shell out for the new WH-1000XM6. They go on sale frequently, but rarely drop this low in price, which comes within $5 of their all-time low. If you’re in the market for over-ear headphones, they’re hard to beat. They’re comfortable, portable, lightweight, and stylish, and they’ll make your music sound great no matter what you like to listen to.

#Memorial #Day #Tech #Deals #Worth #Checkingshopping,deals,memorial day

Post Comment