As of this week, Walt Disney returns to his original Magic Kingdom, with a little help from the magic-makers at Imagineering.
Through the audio-animatronics technology Walt Disney introduced when he opened Disneyland 70 years ago, the evolution of the show robots has gone from static positioning with some movements, as first seen on the singing birds in the Enchanted Tiki Room, to a roaming animatronic of Uncle Walt. Stationed in the Main Street Opera House, the (m)animatronic is the crown jewel of the Walt Disney – A Magical Life show, where he, along with the help of Disney CEO Bob Iger as the program’s narrator, gets to sit and stand front and center to share his story in his words.
The experience begins with Iger’s introduction about the mythical man who disappeared behind the omnipresent name in front of so many childhood classic films and theme park memories. We get a little bit about his upbringing in his words over the film and insight into how he fed his creativity to animate his way out of farm life and made his way to Hollywood with the help of one Mickey Mouse. When it gets to how his daughters influenced him to create a space where families could have fun in the form of Disneyland and how that springboarded into an even bigger dream, the curtain rises and you’re in a recreation of Walt’s office. There, he sits on his desk and continues to regale the quite captive audience with more anecdotes about what he does for the company, or at least what he did once he reached Uncle Walt status, the kindly face on the television introducing The Wonderful World of Disney, or the man who would walk around the park—and it’s utterly surreal. Even as someone who wondered what it would be like to run into Walt at the park, I can assuredly describe it as uncanny yet poignant at the same time.
There’s no avoiding the Westworld comparisons, but the intention isn’t to make him an attraction that’s sentient to the world the real Walt Disney built. It’s still just an experiment to invoke the spirit of the man himself in his iconic grey suit and surrounded by the busywork on his desk. Imagineers on hand talked about the inspiration to bring Walt back for Disneyland’s 70th anniversary.
Tom Fitzgerald, Imagineer and senior creative on the project to bring Walt back to his home park, shared, “We’re excited to finally share this new version of the Walt Disney story with our guests. I mean, I grew up watching Walt Disney on television, like millions of Americans. And every week he would come into our living room, and he’d be leaning on the desk and telling us all about the exciting things that were in store for us. But we realized that a lot of that was long ago, and a lot of people didn’t have that connection with him, and [they] don’t understand that Walt Disney was a person as well as Walt Disney obviously being the company,” he said.
“So we really wanted to sort of bring that connection of what we felt growing up with Walt to an audience today. And not just that, but that his story is so relevant. I think when you see the film before you see the figure actually, the life lessons that he learned are really amazing and important ones. Follow your dream, never give up, turn setbacks into success, and give the world your very best. I mean, those are messages that are as valid today as in Walt’s time.”
Disney was one of the last modern influential global figures to make something of himself from the idea that you could pull yourself up by the bootstraps before it became all but a fairytale these days in most places. And it was one that I myself believed in from his story. Yes, the real Walt Disney was a complicated man, progressive for his time yet not free of criticism that has been interrogated over the years since his passing in 1966 as the Disney empire grew. Here we meet him as an idealized figure in the robot shape of Imagineering’s latest breakthrough advancement. He even quotes his well-worn affirmation to “keep moving forward,” a mantra that got me through school and made me feel fulfilled as milestones overcame the hard times as a writer more and more. Seeing him deliver that line left me verklempt; it’s something I needed to hear today. And yet, I found myself a little spooked by the experience of being in the presence of a robot programmed to stand up and walk around as he said those words, complete with a twinkle in his eye.
Fitzgerald reminded the invited audience that a humanlike animatronic isn’t necessarily anything incredibly new for imagineering. “We have done every president, and we’ve done movie stars,” he said, referring to the stationary likeness of Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones as well as sitting presidents.
“But when you say, ‘I want to do an animatronic figure of Walt Disney,’ that brings enormous responsibility. Probably as much as Walt felt bringing Abraham Lincoln to life—back for the New York World’s Fair in 1964. And so that became a kind of, what we call, moonshot for our team, which is to say, how can we advance the art form and the technology to create a truly believable figure of Walt Disney? And we felt that with the advancements that we’ve been making in recent years, the technology had progressed to the point where we could do that faithfully.”
He shared that the specificity of the eye twinkle was intentional. “We have [Imagineering] groups that say, ‘Let me figure that out.’ And they figured out that the reason we get that little [twinkle in] our eye is because [of] what’s called a corneal bulge. And so physically our [animatronic] figures had not had that before. And so they replicated a corneal bulge so that when you look at him, you get that glint in the eye, which is amazing.” Additionally, there’s more believable animation behind the muscle structure on the face’s movement, drawn from archival footage of Walt combed through to best capture the subject.
It’s momentous indeed, and, dare we say, fun? But of course we have to put our Ian Malcolm glasses on and consider that while we knew this was something Disney could do, should they have?
“I think because of those moon shots and all the work that was done, we really believe it’s the most fluid performance of an audio-animatronics figure we’ve ever done. It’s really interesting too, because in many cases you’re representing figures that people have never seen before. We don’t know how the presidents actually moved, we don’t know how pirates actually move,” said Jeff Shaver-Moskowitz, portfolio executive creative producer, Walt Disney Imagineering.
“But this is a person that we’re all very familiar with. If you get it wrong, it’s like, ‘No, that’s not how Walt would do that. He’d move his hand like this; he’d already put it back here.’ And so it’s really important that you spend so much time focusing on Walt’s mannerisms and his look as well to make sure that you get it as accurate as possible, because we all love Walt Disney, and we want to make sure this is an homage to Walt. This is not just a figure that is telling his story; it’s actually something we all care about. I know everyone here, we have a deep love for Walt Disney and what he gave to us, and so we’re trying to give that back. It’s great. So also, the figure is obviously the most important part in how that worked, but also there’s so much technology that went into the surroundings.”
Seeing one man’s dream become the first step of an eerie, lifelike animatronic sure is something, though. It speaks to the place where his mind might have started things with a mouse, but it’s led to an impossible place where a mouse of another kind might be what activates him.
Walt Disney – A Magical Life opens July 17 at Disneyland.
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Source link
#Walt #Disney #Returns #Surreal #Animatronic #Disneylands #70th #Anniversary
![John Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTube
There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself: [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IQSvi3pXU[/embed] What could be better than this? Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps). I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?
Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.
As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this. YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.
If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support. As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway. This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.
That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to. #John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper John Grisham’s New Legal Drama Is a Real Life Fight Against AI Audiobooks on YouTube
There’s an argument to be made that audiobooks are the finest form of content. You take a book—already off to a good start—and you get to have someone read it right into your ears. And when I say “someone” I mean the GOATs in the voice game. I could cite examples of celebrities you never knew narrated audiobooks, but here’s a sample of Werner Herzog narrating his memoir Every Man for Himself and God Against All that I think speaks for itself: [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4IQSvi3pXU[/embed] What could be better than this? Not only are audiobooks heaven, you can probably get all the audiobooks you want for free (and legally) by getting yourself a library card and using your local library’s preferred app (Libby, perhaps). I say all that, because given all the easy and free access to high quality audiobooks, why in the world would anyone listen to a John Grisham audiobook presented like this?
Don’t click that link. Instead of the actual audiobook, which is read wonderfully by Michael Beck, it will take you to a YouTube video consisting of an AI narrator reading Grisham’s recent hit novel the Widow, and the narration plays under 13 hours of AI slop video—simulated stock footage of fake vacations, basically. It looks like the video they display under the lyrics on Hell’s karaoke machine. I don’t have any science to back this up, but it will definitely give you brain cancer.
As the New York Times points out, 80,000 lost souls listened to the Widow this way. And Grisham is pissed about it. “The thieves and pirates who steal my work and try to profit from it, in any format, should be punished civilly and criminally […] And in this particular example, YouTube is complicit because it’s clear they know what is happening and refuse to stop it,” Grisham told the Times in an email. He should really write about this. YouTube, for its part, says the video is still up because there hasn’t been a takedown request, and that it doesn’t proactively police for copyright violations. “For more than two decades, we’ve built systems that help rights holders manage and control their copyrighted content — investing continuously to make sure those systems evolve as new threats emerge,” Jack Malon, a YouTube spokesperson, wrote to the Times.
If you’ve ever had a YouTube video flagged for a copyright violation, it may have been because of a feature called Content ID that music publishers absolutely love. It allows copyright holders to crawl YouTube and automatically detect copyrighted content. At times, Content ID has been a valuable moneymaking scheme for copyright holders, who were able to zero in on incidental—or even accidental—uses of copyrighted material, especially music, and by making a claim, monetize other people’s videos. It can’t do this anymore, but this is the sort of thing YouTube’s copyright system has been designed to support. As the Times points out, Content ID isn’t great at finding AI-narrated audiobooks. The audio waveform of the content is not the same as the audio the publisher owns, which makes it tricky to know what to even scan for. The author holds a copyright on the text, which can be slightly changed by the creator of the YouTube video while still leaving the book largely intact—good enough for casual listeners anyway. This leaves publishers and authors to navigate the takedown process manually, which seems, judging from the fact that the Widow is still up, to just not be happening.
That’s a pity. And I don’t mean because it’s robbing John Grisham of audiobook sales, which is bad, but not the gravest injustice in the universe. It’s bad because people are listening to such horrible garbage just because it’s available. And they really, truly, don’t have to. #John #Grishams #Legal #Drama #Real #Life #Fight #Audiobooks #YouTubeArtificial intelligence,Audiobooks,Books,intellectual proper](https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2026/05/john-grisham-1280x853.jpg)

Post Comment