×
Deadspin | WNBA draft second-most watched ever with 1.5M viewers  Apr 13, 2026; New York, NY, USA; WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert (left) hugs Azzi Fudd who was selected first overall by the Dallas Wings during the 2026 WNBA Draft at The Shed at Hudson Yards. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images   With uncertainty over the identity of the top overall pick and new NCAA champion UCLA producing a record number of selections, the WNBA draft drew its second-highest viewership total ever on Monday.  According to ESPN, 1.5 million watched the event, a 20% increase from last year’s draft. The audience reached a peak of 1.79 million tuning in shortly before 8 p.m. ET.  The record viewership of 2.45 million was established in 2024, when college stars Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese went first and seventh overall, respectively.  This year, the Dallas Wings chose UConn’s Azzi Fudd No. 1 overall. The Wings also had the first pick last year, which they used to select Fudd’s former UConn teammate, Paige Bueckers, who went on to win WNBA Rookie of the Year.   The Bruins, who won their first NCAA title earlier this month, established WNBA draft records with five first-round picks and six total players chosen.  Lauren Betts (No. 4 to the Washington Mystics), Gabriela Jaquez (No. 5 to the Chicago Sky), Kiki Rice (No. 6 to the expansion Toronto Tempo), Angela Dugalic (No. 9 to the Washington Mystics) and Gianna Kneepkens (No. 15 to the Connecticut Sun) were first-round selections. Charlisse Leger-Walker was chosen with the third pick of the second round (No. 18 overall), by the Sun.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #WNBA #draft #secondmost #watched #1.5M #viewers

Deadspin | WNBA draft second-most watched ever with 1.5M viewers
Deadspin | WNBA draft second-most watched ever with 1.5M viewers  Apr 13, 2026; New York, NY, USA; WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert (left) hugs Azzi Fudd who was selected first overall by the Dallas Wings during the 2026 WNBA Draft at The Shed at Hudson Yards. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images   With uncertainty over the identity of the top overall pick and new NCAA champion UCLA producing a record number of selections, the WNBA draft drew its second-highest viewership total ever on Monday.  According to ESPN, 1.5 million watched the event, a 20% increase from last year’s draft. The audience reached a peak of 1.79 million tuning in shortly before 8 p.m. ET.  The record viewership of 2.45 million was established in 2024, when college stars Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese went first and seventh overall, respectively.  This year, the Dallas Wings chose UConn’s Azzi Fudd No. 1 overall. The Wings also had the first pick last year, which they used to select Fudd’s former UConn teammate, Paige Bueckers, who went on to win WNBA Rookie of the Year.   The Bruins, who won their first NCAA title earlier this month, established WNBA draft records with five first-round picks and six total players chosen.  Lauren Betts (No. 4 to the Washington Mystics), Gabriela Jaquez (No. 5 to the Chicago Sky), Kiki Rice (No. 6 to the expansion Toronto Tempo), Angela Dugalic (No. 9 to the Washington Mystics) and Gianna Kneepkens (No. 15 to the Connecticut Sun) were first-round selections. Charlisse Leger-Walker was chosen with the third pick of the second round (No. 18 overall), by the Sun.  –Field Level Media   #Deadspin #WNBA #draft #secondmost #watched #1.5M #viewersApr 13, 2026; New York, NY, USA; WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert (left) hugs Azzi Fudd who was selected first overall by the Dallas Wings during the 2026 WNBA Draft at The Shed at Hudson Yards. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images

With uncertainty over the identity of the top overall pick and new NCAA champion UCLA producing a record number of selections, the WNBA draft drew its second-highest viewership total ever on Monday.

According to ESPN, 1.5 million watched the event, a 20% increase from last year’s draft. The audience reached a peak of 1.79 million tuning in shortly before 8 p.m. ET.

The record viewership of 2.45 million was established in 2024, when college stars Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese went first and seventh overall, respectively.


This year, the Dallas Wings chose UConn’s Azzi Fudd No. 1 overall. The Wings also had the first pick last year, which they used to select Fudd’s former UConn teammate, Paige Bueckers, who went on to win WNBA Rookie of the Year.

The Bruins, who won their first NCAA title earlier this month, established WNBA draft records with five first-round picks and six total players chosen.

Lauren Betts (No. 4 to the Washington Mystics), Gabriela Jaquez (No. 5 to the Chicago Sky), Kiki Rice (No. 6 to the expansion Toronto Tempo), Angela Dugalic (No. 9 to the Washington Mystics) and Gianna Kneepkens (No. 15 to the Connecticut Sun) were first-round selections. Charlisse Leger-Walker was chosen with the third pick of the second round (No. 18 overall), by the Sun.

–Field Level Media

#Deadspin #WNBA #draft #secondmost #watched #1.5M #viewers

Apr 13, 2026; New York, NY, USA; WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert (left) hugs Azzi Fudd who was selected first overall by the Dallas Wings during the 2026 WNBA Draft at The Shed at Hudson Yards. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images

With uncertainty over the identity of the top overall pick and new NCAA champion UCLA producing a record number of selections, the WNBA draft drew its second-highest viewership total ever on Monday.

According to ESPN, 1.5 million watched the event, a 20% increase from last year’s draft. The audience reached a peak of 1.79 million tuning in shortly before 8 p.m. ET.

The record viewership of 2.45 million was established in 2024, when college stars Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese went first and seventh overall, respectively.

This year, the Dallas Wings chose UConn’s Azzi Fudd No. 1 overall. The Wings also had the first pick last year, which they used to select Fudd’s former UConn teammate, Paige Bueckers, who went on to win WNBA Rookie of the Year.

The Bruins, who won their first NCAA title earlier this month, established WNBA draft records with five first-round picks and six total players chosen.

Lauren Betts (No. 4 to the Washington Mystics), Gabriela Jaquez (No. 5 to the Chicago Sky), Kiki Rice (No. 6 to the expansion Toronto Tempo), Angela Dugalic (No. 9 to the Washington Mystics) and Gianna Kneepkens (No. 15 to the Connecticut Sun) were first-round selections. Charlisse Leger-Walker was chosen with the third pick of the second round (No. 18 overall), by the Sun.

–Field Level Media

Source link
#Deadspin #WNBA #draft #secondmost #watched #1.5M #viewers

Previous post

MI vs PBKS IPL 2026, Live streaming info: When and where to watch Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings match today? <div id="content-body-70864946" itemprop="articleBody"><p>Mumbai Indians will take on Punjab Kings at the Wankhede Stadium on Thursday in the Indian Premier League (IPL).</p><p>Mumbai has lost three of the four games it has played, sitting ninth in the table. Meanwhile, Punjab remains unbeaten with three wins from four games and one no-result.</p><p>Last season, PBKS won both its encounters against MI by seven and five wickets with one win being in the Qualifier-2.</p><p><i>Here are the live streaming and telecast details:</i></p><p><b>Where will the Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 be played?</b></p><p>The Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match will be played at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai.</p><p><b>When will the Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 be played?</b></p><p>The Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match will be played on Thursday, April 16.</p><p><b>At what time will the Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match start?</b></p><p>The Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match will start at 7:30 PM IST.</p><p><b>At what time will the toss for Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match happen?</b></p><p>The toss of the Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match will take place at 7:00 PM IST.</p><p><b>Which TV channel will broadcast the Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match?</b></p><p>The Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match will be televised live on the <i>Star Sports Network</i> in India.</p><p><b>How to watch the live streaming of the Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match?</b></p><p>The Mumbai Indians vs Punjab Kings IPL 2026 match will be streamed live on the <i>JioHotstar </i>app and website.</p><p class="publish-time" id="end-of-article">Published on Apr 16, 2026</p></div> #PBKS #IPL #Live #streaming #info #watch #Mumbai #Indians #Punjab #Kings #match #today

Next post

Ind vs SA T20I: A series that arrives with context attached <div id="content-body-70832862" itemprop="articleBody"><p>Five months ago, on the now hallowed turf of the D.Y. Patil Stadium, India and South Africa came face to face, with a shiny ICC ODI World Cup trophy propped between them. An epic final ensued, with momentum swinging wildly between the two challengers. Eventually, India entered a vortex of glory, one unexplored before, with a sea of blue chanting as it ascended the 50-over throne. The Proteas, meanwhile, were resigned to a familiar loop of despair.</p><p>In 2023, Meg Lanning’s Australia denied the side World T20 glory in front of a heartbroken home crowd. In 2024, it was Sophie Devine’s White Ferns who blew the South Africans away into the Emirati desert. A third heartbreak, this time on Indian soil, can do one of two things: birth an almost vengeful pursuit of triumph or break the progress made so far. When the T20 World Cup comes around in June, this time in England, the ecosystem will have its answers.</p><p>A credible dress rehearsal is on the cards when Harmanpreet Kaur and Co. fly to South Africa for a five-match T20I series starting April 17. This is the last bilateral series the Proteas will play before boarding the flight to England, leaving a 47-day gap before they take the field again in the World Cup. India, meanwhile, has squeezed in a T20I series against England, three matches that will aid acclimatisation and offer a more realistic picture of form and adaptability to conditions.</p><p>Both sides are placed in Group 1 alongside Australia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and the Netherlands, with their encounter in the T20 showpiece scheduled for June 21 at Old Trafford in Manchester. The two nations have faced each other in 19 T20Is, with India winning 10, South Africa six, and three yielding no result.</p><p>Since the 2024 World Cup, India has played four T20I series, against West Indies (home), England (away), Sri Lanka (home), and Australia (away), winning them all. A particularly historic result was beating six-time world T20 champion Australia in its own backyard 2-1, a series triumph Down Under that came after a decade. That the rest of the tour went remarkably abysmally is a conversation for another day.</p><p>While the 2024 T20 World Cup came with experimentation en masse, with several debuts handed out, the Indian team one sees today is far more stable, working around a core group. Shafali Verma is back in the thick of things and is set to play her 100th T20I during the series. In the big picture, it is a heartening sign of how regular fixtures for this Indian women’s team, which once played a tour a year at times, have now become. Smriti Mandhana has found consistency, but the middle order still needs bolstering.</p><p>Towards that end, young Anushka Sharma has been handed a maiden call-up after promising performances in the domestic circuit and in her debut Women’s Premier League season, where the 22-year-old offspin-bowling all-rounder impressed for Gujarat Giants by scoring 177 runs, with 124 of them coming in boundaries. Her fluency at No. 3 and scoring intent make her a solid alternative to Harleen Deol, whose strike rate and rotation have often drawn flak.</p><p>Another interesting addition to the setup is Anushka’s Giants teammate Bharti Fulmali, who last featured for India in 2019. Her ability to accelerate lower down the order is a role she has prolifically essayed for Vidarbha and the Giants over the years. Consistency has often pushed her out of the reckoning, but the 2025 and 2026 WPL seasons saw her deliver in crunch situations, enough to earn the trust of the management. A partnership between her and Richa Ghosh could help India avoid the occasional drop in momentum in the slog overs, especially if wickets fall.</p><p>India has dropped budding keeper-batter G. Kamalini, whose topsy-turvy debut against Sri Lanka showed that her glovework still needs fine-tuning. Uma Chetry returns, and while she is a stable presence behind the stumps, her batting returns are not like-for-like. The issue of Richa not having credible competition to keep her on her toes has been brewing for a few years now, particularly in her role lower down the order, and is something the think tank must address in the larger scheme of things.</p><p>With the World Cup in pace-friendly England, India’s top priority will be sharpening its seam attack. Kranti Gaud, Arundhati Reddy, and Renuka Singh Thakur are joined by Kashvee Gautam, who will look to shake off injury interruptions and make a strong case for the Indian 15. This is particularly crucial given the careful workload management of Renuka and her limited utility with the bat. Kashvee, a handy batter who can hit long, adds depth to the lower order.</p><p>For South Africa, two series wins have come in the five played: against relatively weaker teams like Ireland and Pakistan. With Marizanne Kapp’s workload being carefully managed, the bowling has looked a little blunt, allowing standout performances like Fatima Sana’s striking across formats and Amelia Kerr’s unbeaten 179 in a record-breaking ODI chase.</p><p>The South African top order has been among the runs and will look to build consistency against a probing Indian attack before the World Cup. A fresh addition is Kayla Reyneke, who helped secure thrilling wins against Pakistan and New Zealand. Having led the U-19 setup, the off-spin allrounder will aim to cement her place. Another selection to watch is former captain Dane van Niekerk (pic, below), reintegrated as a pure batter. Questions around fitness and competition remain, but coach Mandla Mashimbyi will welcome this as a problem worth having. Onto Kingsmead!</p><p class="publish-time" id="end-of-article">Published on Apr 16, 2026</p><h3 class="title-patch">More stories from this issue</h3></div> #Ind #T20I #series #arrives #context #attached

The 2026 NFL Draft class may not be loaded with premier talent at the top of the draft, but teams in need of pass rushers will find plenty of depth on the board next week. Five edge rushers are currently ranked in the top 32 spots on the Mock Draft Database consensus board, and several others could easily find their way into the first round mix.

Seven edge defenders came off the board in Round 1 of the 2023 NFL Draft, but that number fell off in 2024 (4) and 2025 (5). Still, this is undoubtedly one of the most coveted position in the NFL after quarterback, and scoring a difference-making edge rusher on a rookie contract is among the most valuable things a GM can add to their team.

But it also might be the most difficult position to scout accurately. The few no-brainers – Myles Garrett, Will Anderson, Nick Bosa, etc. – tend to work out as expected, but the bust rate has been high at this position too, and plenty of talent somehow still slips through to the later rounds. I recently compiled a rough ranking of my top 20 edge defenders in the NFL. Amongst the names, 10 were first round picks, and 10 were picked no. 64 or later in the draft.

In other words, it pays to be anti-consensus in your pre-draft rankings, because 3-4 years from draft day, edge defender classes are stacking up much differently than they were before the draft. Having said that, being different than consensus doesn’t automatically ensure you’ll be right either. So here is my best shot at ranking the 2026 edge defender class based on tape study and advanced stats.

Lawrence may not have the reputation of a top edge defender, but in a class where all of the top edges have flaws, I’ll take my chances with the long-armed, Central Florida pass rusher. Lawrence took some time to grow into the player he became in 2025, when he posted seven sacks and 11 tackles-for-loss. Lawrence has the burst off the ball, the cornering ability at the top of the arc and the sophisticated hand usage to battle through contact at the top of the arc.

Bain has been billed by many as a speed-to-power rusher, but while that is in the bag for him, he mostly wins as a high-side threat thanks to his pad level at the top of the arc. The Miami product’s forward lean into his rushes makes it very difficult for tackles to hit him squarely in pass protection. As for Bain’s short arms, I’m less concerned with that part of his profile than I am his limited overall athletic ability, which could hinder his ability to drop-and-cover, play in space against the run and change direction as a pass rusher.

If I was just ranking the best edge defenders in the class off of 2025 season tape, there is a great chance Mesidor would be no. 1. His explosiveness off the ball and shiftiness as a pass rusher resulted in a late-college breakout 12.5-sack, 17.5-tackle for loss season. Unfortunately, Mesidor has a history of injuries, turned 25 two weeks ago and provided no athletic testing during the pre-draft process by choice, not due to injury.

4. David Bailey, Texas Tech

Bailey has the length, size and explosiveness you look for in a top pass rusher, erupting off the ball to win the edge repeatedly at the college level. Things will get harder in the NFL, where better tackles will force him to play with more nuance and consistency as a rusher. If Bailey improves his pass rush plan execution and efficiency against better competition, he’ll be in the conversation for best edge in the class despite his struggles at the point-of-attack in the run game.

5. Cashius Howell, Texas A&M

If I could only pick a single player from this draft to win a pass rush rep with my life on the line, I would pick Howell. His speed up the arc and cornering ability are stuff that wins in the NFL, consistently threatening offensive tackles on their outside shoulder. Howell isn’t incapable when it comes to converting speed-to-power either, but his lack of length and mass make it more difficult to see a full-time role in his future.

6. Keyron Crawford, Auburn

Did you know that Keyron Crawford had more sacks, pressures, quarterback hits and a better pass rush win rate (PFF) than Keldric Faulk, despite 76 fewer opportunities to rush the passer? Crawford is a guy I’m betting on in this class, with the ability to drop and cover, move around the front, be a critical part of pressure packages and even win 1v1 at a budding rate off the edge.

7. R Mason Thomas, Oklahoma

Thomas fits into a similar bucket to Cashius Howell as players who may get stuck in a Nick Herbig-type of NFL role due to size/length concerns. But there are few more valuable roles for a defensive player than being able to rush the passer, which Thomas will have more chances to do 1v1 outside of Oklahoma’s scheme. The flashes of burst/bend/hand usage on tape are what you’re buying for a still fairly unproven player.

8. Jaishawn Barham, Michigan

Give me players who compete with zero hesitation, top-notch explosiveness and extreme violence on the edge of the defensive front. Barham looked like a natural in his first year as a full-time edge for Michigan in 2025, dominating against the run while beginning to show real pass rush ability for the first time.

Jacas is a big riser for me over the past week, as I explored a few of his games I hadn’t studied yet. He needs to clean up his stance to maximize his get-off in the NFL, but the twitch off the ball, violent style of play and flashes of speed-counter rush plans eventually won me over. The best might be yet to come for Jacas in the NFL.

10. Keldric Faulk, Auburn

I’m lower on Faulk than consensus, even though I agree he can be better in the NFL with further development as a pass rusher. He’ll need to be, as Faulk barely made a statistical dent in college on passing downs. There are flashes of ability, but the explosiveness and high side rush ability to win the edge consistently are missing. Could Faulk be destined for a move inside, at least on passing downs?

11. Derrick Moore, Michigan

Everyone has the same assessment of Moore — a solid player whose upside is limited, but can probably help any defense as a rotational player sharing the load up front. Moore is another player who needs to fix his pre-snap stance to ensure a better get-off at the snap, but his stop/start hesitation move rushes are some of the best in the class.

12. Joshua Josephs, Tennessee

Josephs is an unbelievably talented football player with frustratingly little consistency, attention to detail or sound mental processing in his game. I love his explosiveness off the ball, violence into contact and elite physical tools, but he’s played less than 1,200 career snaps at Tennessee, often looks confused on the field and has an under-developed pass rush plan resulting in very poor career production (9.5 sacks).

Young’s last couple weeks of the season were encouraging, as he finally looked like he was figuring it out a little bit as a pass rusher. He has an unbelievable physical build, but is really athletically limited compared to most of the players above him on this list. Without elite burst off the ball, speed up the arc or bend around the corner, Young needs to be a bully who wins with pass rush savvy and power. He’s not there yet, but there is potential, especially as an inside rusher.

14. Romello Height, Texas Tech

Try as I might, I can’t quit Romello Height. That’s been one of the themes of evaluating the 25-year old Height as I attempt to reconcile Height’s six years in four different college programs with very little to show for it until 2025. At Texas Tech his twitchiness and change-of-direction ability allowed him to blossom as a speed-counter rusher, but Height struggles to hold up physically in a big role at a lanky 239 pounds.

Parker is the edge rusher I’m lowest on compared to consensus, as I just don’t see the type of athletic profile or pass rush skill set to value highly off the edge in the NFL, in his 2024 or 2025 tape. Parker isn’t the type of player who will threaten offensive linemen with speed or quickness, which limits the effectiveness of his power game too. As a run defender he holds his own in the box, but won’t be a really impactful player outside of that space.

#Malachi #Lawrence #Rueben #Bain #among #topranked #edges #NFL #Draft">Malachi Lawrence, Rueben Bain among top-ranked edges in 2026 NFL Draft  The 2026 NFL Draft class may not be loaded with premier talent at the top of the draft, but teams in need of pass rushers will find plenty of depth on the board next week. Five edge rushers are currently ranked in the top 32 spots on the Mock Draft Database consensus board, and several others could easily find their way into the first round mix.Seven edge defenders came off the board in Round 1 of the 2023 NFL Draft, but that number fell off in 2024 (4) and 2025 (5). Still, this is undoubtedly one of the most coveted position in the NFL after quarterback, and scoring a difference-making edge rusher on a rookie contract is among the most valuable things a GM can add to their team.But it also might be the most difficult position to scout accurately. The few no-brainers – Myles Garrett, Will Anderson, Nick Bosa, etc. – tend to work out as expected, but the bust rate has been high at this position too, and plenty of talent somehow still slips through to the later rounds. I recently compiled a rough ranking of my top 20 edge defenders in the NFL. Amongst the names, 10 were first round picks, and 10 were picked no. 64 or later in the draft.In other words, it pays to be anti-consensus in your pre-draft rankings, because 3-4 years from draft day, edge defender classes are stacking up much differently than they were before the draft. Having said that, being different than consensus doesn’t automatically ensure you’ll be right either. So here is my best shot at ranking the 2026 edge defender class based on tape study and advanced stats.Lawrence may not have the reputation of a top edge defender, but in a class where all of the top edges have flaws, I’ll take my chances with the long-armed, Central Florida pass rusher. Lawrence took some time to grow into the player he became in 2025, when he posted seven sacks and 11 tackles-for-loss. Lawrence has the burst off the ball, the cornering ability at the top of the arc and the sophisticated hand usage to battle through contact at the top of the arc.Bain has been billed by many as a speed-to-power rusher, but while that is in the bag for him, he mostly wins as a high-side threat thanks to his pad level at the top of the arc. The Miami product’s forward lean into his rushes makes it very difficult for tackles to hit him squarely in pass protection. As for Bain’s short arms, I’m less concerned with that part of his profile than I am his limited overall athletic ability, which could hinder his ability to drop-and-cover, play in space against the run and change direction as a pass rusher.If I was just ranking the best edge defenders in the class off of 2025 season tape, there is a great chance Mesidor would be no. 1. His explosiveness off the ball and shiftiness as a pass rusher resulted in a late-college breakout 12.5-sack, 17.5-tackle for loss season. Unfortunately, Mesidor has a history of injuries, turned 25 two weeks ago and provided no athletic testing during the pre-draft process by choice, not due to injury.4. David Bailey, Texas TechBailey has the length, size and explosiveness you look for in a top pass rusher, erupting off the ball to win the edge repeatedly at the college level. Things will get harder in the NFL, where better tackles will force him to play with more nuance and consistency as a rusher. If Bailey improves his pass rush plan execution and efficiency against better competition, he’ll be in the conversation for best edge in the class despite his struggles at the point-of-attack in the run game.5. Cashius Howell, Texas A&MIf I could only pick a single player from this draft to win a pass rush rep with my life on the line, I would pick Howell. His speed up the arc and cornering ability are stuff that wins in the NFL, consistently threatening offensive tackles on their outside shoulder. Howell isn’t incapable when it comes to converting speed-to-power either, but his lack of length and mass make it more difficult to see a full-time role in his future.6. Keyron Crawford, AuburnDid you know that Keyron Crawford had more sacks, pressures, quarterback hits and a better pass rush win rate (PFF) than Keldric Faulk, despite 76 fewer opportunities to rush the passer? Crawford is a guy I’m betting on in this class, with the ability to drop and cover, move around the front, be a critical part of pressure packages and even win 1v1 at a budding rate off the edge.7. R Mason Thomas, OklahomaThomas fits into a similar bucket to Cashius Howell as players who may get stuck in a Nick Herbig-type of NFL role due to size/length concerns. But there are few more valuable roles for a defensive player than being able to rush the passer, which Thomas will have more chances to do 1v1 outside of Oklahoma’s scheme. The flashes of burst/bend/hand usage on tape are what you’re buying for a still fairly unproven player.8. Jaishawn Barham, MichiganGive me players who compete with zero hesitation, top-notch explosiveness and extreme violence on the edge of the defensive front. Barham looked like a natural in his first year as a full-time edge for Michigan in 2025, dominating against the run while beginning to show real pass rush ability for the first time.Jacas is a big riser for me over the past week, as I explored a few of his games I hadn’t studied yet. He needs to clean up his stance to maximize his get-off in the NFL, but the twitch off the ball, violent style of play and flashes of speed-counter rush plans eventually won me over. The best might be yet to come for Jacas in the NFL.10. Keldric Faulk, AuburnI’m lower on Faulk than consensus, even though I agree he can be better in the NFL with further development as a pass rusher. He’ll need to be, as Faulk barely made a statistical dent in college on passing downs. There are flashes of ability, but the explosiveness and high side rush ability to win the edge consistently are missing. Could Faulk be destined for a move inside, at least on passing downs?11. Derrick Moore, MichiganEveryone has the same assessment of Moore — a solid player whose upside is limited, but can probably help any defense as a rotational player sharing the load up front. Moore is another player who needs to fix his pre-snap stance to ensure a better get-off at the snap, but his stop/start hesitation move rushes are some of the best in the class.12. Joshua Josephs, TennesseeJosephs is an unbelievably talented football player with frustratingly little consistency, attention to detail or sound mental processing in his game. I love his explosiveness off the ball, violence into contact and elite physical tools, but he’s played less than 1,200 career snaps at Tennessee, often looks confused on the field and has an under-developed pass rush plan resulting in very poor career production (9.5 sacks).Young’s last couple weeks of the season were encouraging, as he finally looked like he was figuring it out a little bit as a pass rusher. He has an unbelievable physical build, but is really athletically limited compared to most of the players above him on this list. Without elite burst off the ball, speed up the arc or bend around the corner, Young needs to be a bully who wins with pass rush savvy and power. He’s not there yet, but there is potential, especially as an inside rusher.14. Romello Height, Texas TechTry as I might, I can’t quit Romello Height. That’s been one of the themes of evaluating the 25-year old Height as I attempt to reconcile Height’s six years in four different college programs with very little to show for it until 2025. At Texas Tech his twitchiness and change-of-direction ability allowed him to blossom as a speed-counter rusher, but Height struggles to hold up physically in a big role at a lanky 239 pounds.Parker is the edge rusher I’m lowest on compared to consensus, as I just don’t see the type of athletic profile or pass rush skill set to value highly off the edge in the NFL, in his 2024 or 2025 tape. Parker isn’t the type of player who will threaten offensive linemen with speed or quickness, which limits the effectiveness of his power game too. As a run defender he holds his own in the box, but won’t be a really impactful player outside of that space.  #Malachi #Lawrence #Rueben #Bain #among #topranked #edges #NFL #Draft

Mock Draft Database consensus board, and several others could easily find their way into the first round mix.

Seven edge defenders came off the board in Round 1 of the 2023 NFL Draft, but that number fell off in 2024 (4) and 2025 (5). Still, this is undoubtedly one of the most coveted position in the NFL after quarterback, and scoring a difference-making edge rusher on a rookie contract is among the most valuable things a GM can add to their team.

But it also might be the most difficult position to scout accurately. The few no-brainers – Myles Garrett, Will Anderson, Nick Bosa, etc. – tend to work out as expected, but the bust rate has been high at this position too, and plenty of talent somehow still slips through to the later rounds. I recently compiled a rough ranking of my top 20 edge defenders in the NFL. Amongst the names, 10 were first round picks, and 10 were picked no. 64 or later in the draft.

In other words, it pays to be anti-consensus in your pre-draft rankings, because 3-4 years from draft day, edge defender classes are stacking up much differently than they were before the draft. Having said that, being different than consensus doesn’t automatically ensure you’ll be right either. So here is my best shot at ranking the 2026 edge defender class based on tape study and advanced stats.

Lawrence may not have the reputation of a top edge defender, but in a class where all of the top edges have flaws, I’ll take my chances with the long-armed, Central Florida pass rusher. Lawrence took some time to grow into the player he became in 2025, when he posted seven sacks and 11 tackles-for-loss. Lawrence has the burst off the ball, the cornering ability at the top of the arc and the sophisticated hand usage to battle through contact at the top of the arc.

Bain has been billed by many as a speed-to-power rusher, but while that is in the bag for him, he mostly wins as a high-side threat thanks to his pad level at the top of the arc. The Miami product’s forward lean into his rushes makes it very difficult for tackles to hit him squarely in pass protection. As for Bain’s short arms, I’m less concerned with that part of his profile than I am his limited overall athletic ability, which could hinder his ability to drop-and-cover, play in space against the run and change direction as a pass rusher.

If I was just ranking the best edge defenders in the class off of 2025 season tape, there is a great chance Mesidor would be no. 1. His explosiveness off the ball and shiftiness as a pass rusher resulted in a late-college breakout 12.5-sack, 17.5-tackle for loss season. Unfortunately, Mesidor has a history of injuries, turned 25 two weeks ago and provided no athletic testing during the pre-draft process by choice, not due to injury.

4. David Bailey, Texas Tech

Bailey has the length, size and explosiveness you look for in a top pass rusher, erupting off the ball to win the edge repeatedly at the college level. Things will get harder in the NFL, where better tackles will force him to play with more nuance and consistency as a rusher. If Bailey improves his pass rush plan execution and efficiency against better competition, he’ll be in the conversation for best edge in the class despite his struggles at the point-of-attack in the run game.

5. Cashius Howell, Texas A&M

If I could only pick a single player from this draft to win a pass rush rep with my life on the line, I would pick Howell. His speed up the arc and cornering ability are stuff that wins in the NFL, consistently threatening offensive tackles on their outside shoulder. Howell isn’t incapable when it comes to converting speed-to-power either, but his lack of length and mass make it more difficult to see a full-time role in his future.

6. Keyron Crawford, Auburn

Did you know that Keyron Crawford had more sacks, pressures, quarterback hits and a better pass rush win rate (PFF) than Keldric Faulk, despite 76 fewer opportunities to rush the passer? Crawford is a guy I’m betting on in this class, with the ability to drop and cover, move around the front, be a critical part of pressure packages and even win 1v1 at a budding rate off the edge.

7. R Mason Thomas, Oklahoma

Thomas fits into a similar bucket to Cashius Howell as players who may get stuck in a Nick Herbig-type of NFL role due to size/length concerns. But there are few more valuable roles for a defensive player than being able to rush the passer, which Thomas will have more chances to do 1v1 outside of Oklahoma’s scheme. The flashes of burst/bend/hand usage on tape are what you’re buying for a still fairly unproven player.

8. Jaishawn Barham, Michigan

Give me players who compete with zero hesitation, top-notch explosiveness and extreme violence on the edge of the defensive front. Barham looked like a natural in his first year as a full-time edge for Michigan in 2025, dominating against the run while beginning to show real pass rush ability for the first time.

Jacas is a big riser for me over the past week, as I explored a few of his games I hadn’t studied yet. He needs to clean up his stance to maximize his get-off in the NFL, but the twitch off the ball, violent style of play and flashes of speed-counter rush plans eventually won me over. The best might be yet to come for Jacas in the NFL.

10. Keldric Faulk, Auburn

I’m lower on Faulk than consensus, even though I agree he can be better in the NFL with further development as a pass rusher. He’ll need to be, as Faulk barely made a statistical dent in college on passing downs. There are flashes of ability, but the explosiveness and high side rush ability to win the edge consistently are missing. Could Faulk be destined for a move inside, at least on passing downs?

11. Derrick Moore, Michigan

Everyone has the same assessment of Moore — a solid player whose upside is limited, but can probably help any defense as a rotational player sharing the load up front. Moore is another player who needs to fix his pre-snap stance to ensure a better get-off at the snap, but his stop/start hesitation move rushes are some of the best in the class.

12. Joshua Josephs, Tennessee

Josephs is an unbelievably talented football player with frustratingly little consistency, attention to detail or sound mental processing in his game. I love his explosiveness off the ball, violence into contact and elite physical tools, but he’s played less than 1,200 career snaps at Tennessee, often looks confused on the field and has an under-developed pass rush plan resulting in very poor career production (9.5 sacks).

Young’s last couple weeks of the season were encouraging, as he finally looked like he was figuring it out a little bit as a pass rusher. He has an unbelievable physical build, but is really athletically limited compared to most of the players above him on this list. Without elite burst off the ball, speed up the arc or bend around the corner, Young needs to be a bully who wins with pass rush savvy and power. He’s not there yet, but there is potential, especially as an inside rusher.

14. Romello Height, Texas Tech

Try as I might, I can’t quit Romello Height. That’s been one of the themes of evaluating the 25-year old Height as I attempt to reconcile Height’s six years in four different college programs with very little to show for it until 2025. At Texas Tech his twitchiness and change-of-direction ability allowed him to blossom as a speed-counter rusher, but Height struggles to hold up physically in a big role at a lanky 239 pounds.

Parker is the edge rusher I’m lowest on compared to consensus, as I just don’t see the type of athletic profile or pass rush skill set to value highly off the edge in the NFL, in his 2024 or 2025 tape. Parker isn’t the type of player who will threaten offensive linemen with speed or quickness, which limits the effectiveness of his power game too. As a run defender he holds his own in the box, but won’t be a really impactful player outside of that space.

#Malachi #Lawrence #Rueben #Bain #among #topranked #edges #NFL #Draft">Malachi Lawrence, Rueben Bain among top-ranked edges in 2026 NFL Draft

The 2026 NFL Draft class may not be loaded with premier talent at the top of the draft, but teams in need of pass rushers will find plenty of depth on the board next week. Five edge rushers are currently ranked in the top 32 spots on the Mock Draft Database consensus board, and several others could easily find their way into the first round mix.

Seven edge defenders came off the board in Round 1 of the 2023 NFL Draft, but that number fell off in 2024 (4) and 2025 (5). Still, this is undoubtedly one of the most coveted position in the NFL after quarterback, and scoring a difference-making edge rusher on a rookie contract is among the most valuable things a GM can add to their team.

But it also might be the most difficult position to scout accurately. The few no-brainers – Myles Garrett, Will Anderson, Nick Bosa, etc. – tend to work out as expected, but the bust rate has been high at this position too, and plenty of talent somehow still slips through to the later rounds. I recently compiled a rough ranking of my top 20 edge defenders in the NFL. Amongst the names, 10 were first round picks, and 10 were picked no. 64 or later in the draft.

In other words, it pays to be anti-consensus in your pre-draft rankings, because 3-4 years from draft day, edge defender classes are stacking up much differently than they were before the draft. Having said that, being different than consensus doesn’t automatically ensure you’ll be right either. So here is my best shot at ranking the 2026 edge defender class based on tape study and advanced stats.

Lawrence may not have the reputation of a top edge defender, but in a class where all of the top edges have flaws, I’ll take my chances with the long-armed, Central Florida pass rusher. Lawrence took some time to grow into the player he became in 2025, when he posted seven sacks and 11 tackles-for-loss. Lawrence has the burst off the ball, the cornering ability at the top of the arc and the sophisticated hand usage to battle through contact at the top of the arc.

Bain has been billed by many as a speed-to-power rusher, but while that is in the bag for him, he mostly wins as a high-side threat thanks to his pad level at the top of the arc. The Miami product’s forward lean into his rushes makes it very difficult for tackles to hit him squarely in pass protection. As for Bain’s short arms, I’m less concerned with that part of his profile than I am his limited overall athletic ability, which could hinder his ability to drop-and-cover, play in space against the run and change direction as a pass rusher.

If I was just ranking the best edge defenders in the class off of 2025 season tape, there is a great chance Mesidor would be no. 1. His explosiveness off the ball and shiftiness as a pass rusher resulted in a late-college breakout 12.5-sack, 17.5-tackle for loss season. Unfortunately, Mesidor has a history of injuries, turned 25 two weeks ago and provided no athletic testing during the pre-draft process by choice, not due to injury.

4. David Bailey, Texas Tech

Bailey has the length, size and explosiveness you look for in a top pass rusher, erupting off the ball to win the edge repeatedly at the college level. Things will get harder in the NFL, where better tackles will force him to play with more nuance and consistency as a rusher. If Bailey improves his pass rush plan execution and efficiency against better competition, he’ll be in the conversation for best edge in the class despite his struggles at the point-of-attack in the run game.

5. Cashius Howell, Texas A&M

If I could only pick a single player from this draft to win a pass rush rep with my life on the line, I would pick Howell. His speed up the arc and cornering ability are stuff that wins in the NFL, consistently threatening offensive tackles on their outside shoulder. Howell isn’t incapable when it comes to converting speed-to-power either, but his lack of length and mass make it more difficult to see a full-time role in his future.

6. Keyron Crawford, Auburn

Did you know that Keyron Crawford had more sacks, pressures, quarterback hits and a better pass rush win rate (PFF) than Keldric Faulk, despite 76 fewer opportunities to rush the passer? Crawford is a guy I’m betting on in this class, with the ability to drop and cover, move around the front, be a critical part of pressure packages and even win 1v1 at a budding rate off the edge.

7. R Mason Thomas, Oklahoma

Thomas fits into a similar bucket to Cashius Howell as players who may get stuck in a Nick Herbig-type of NFL role due to size/length concerns. But there are few more valuable roles for a defensive player than being able to rush the passer, which Thomas will have more chances to do 1v1 outside of Oklahoma’s scheme. The flashes of burst/bend/hand usage on tape are what you’re buying for a still fairly unproven player.

8. Jaishawn Barham, Michigan

Give me players who compete with zero hesitation, top-notch explosiveness and extreme violence on the edge of the defensive front. Barham looked like a natural in his first year as a full-time edge for Michigan in 2025, dominating against the run while beginning to show real pass rush ability for the first time.

Jacas is a big riser for me over the past week, as I explored a few of his games I hadn’t studied yet. He needs to clean up his stance to maximize his get-off in the NFL, but the twitch off the ball, violent style of play and flashes of speed-counter rush plans eventually won me over. The best might be yet to come for Jacas in the NFL.

10. Keldric Faulk, Auburn

I’m lower on Faulk than consensus, even though I agree he can be better in the NFL with further development as a pass rusher. He’ll need to be, as Faulk barely made a statistical dent in college on passing downs. There are flashes of ability, but the explosiveness and high side rush ability to win the edge consistently are missing. Could Faulk be destined for a move inside, at least on passing downs?

11. Derrick Moore, Michigan

Everyone has the same assessment of Moore — a solid player whose upside is limited, but can probably help any defense as a rotational player sharing the load up front. Moore is another player who needs to fix his pre-snap stance to ensure a better get-off at the snap, but his stop/start hesitation move rushes are some of the best in the class.

12. Joshua Josephs, Tennessee

Josephs is an unbelievably talented football player with frustratingly little consistency, attention to detail or sound mental processing in his game. I love his explosiveness off the ball, violence into contact and elite physical tools, but he’s played less than 1,200 career snaps at Tennessee, often looks confused on the field and has an under-developed pass rush plan resulting in very poor career production (9.5 sacks).

Young’s last couple weeks of the season were encouraging, as he finally looked like he was figuring it out a little bit as a pass rusher. He has an unbelievable physical build, but is really athletically limited compared to most of the players above him on this list. Without elite burst off the ball, speed up the arc or bend around the corner, Young needs to be a bully who wins with pass rush savvy and power. He’s not there yet, but there is potential, especially as an inside rusher.

14. Romello Height, Texas Tech

Try as I might, I can’t quit Romello Height. That’s been one of the themes of evaluating the 25-year old Height as I attempt to reconcile Height’s six years in four different college programs with very little to show for it until 2025. At Texas Tech his twitchiness and change-of-direction ability allowed him to blossom as a speed-counter rusher, but Height struggles to hold up physically in a big role at a lanky 239 pounds.

Parker is the edge rusher I’m lowest on compared to consensus, as I just don’t see the type of athletic profile or pass rush skill set to value highly off the edge in the NFL, in his 2024 or 2025 tape. Parker isn’t the type of player who will threaten offensive linemen with speed or quickness, which limits the effectiveness of his power game too. As a run defender he holds his own in the box, but won’t be a really impactful player outside of that space.

#Malachi #Lawrence #Rueben #Bain #among #topranked #edges #NFL #Draft

Former Austria goalkeeper Alex Manninger, who played for Arsenal and a string of Italian clubs, died in a road accident on Thursday aged 48, the Austrian Football Association (OEFB) said.

The Kronen Zeitung and other media reported that Manninger’s vehicle was hit by a passenger train at an unmanned crossing near the Austrian city of Salzburg.

Manninger made 33 appearances for Austria and played for Arsenal, mainly as a reserve, between 1997 and 2001. He ended his career at Liverpool during the 2016-17 season.

In Italy, he played for Fiorentina, Torino, Bologna, Siena, Udinese and Juventus.

“Alexander Manninger was an outstanding ambassador of Austrian football on and off the pitch,” OEFB sporting director Peter Schöttel said in a statement.

“With his international career, he set standards and inspired and shaped many young goalkeepers. His professionalism, calmness and reliability made him an important part of his teams and the national side.”

Published on Apr 16, 2026

#Austria #goalkeeper #Manninger #dies #aged #cartrain #collision">Former Austria goalkeeper Manninger dies aged 48 after car-train collision  Former Austria goalkeeper Alex Manninger, who played for Arsenal and a string of Italian clubs, died in a road accident on Thursday aged 48, the Austrian Football Association (OEFB) said.The        Kronen Zeitung and other media reported that Manninger’s vehicle was hit by a passenger train at an unmanned crossing near the Austrian city of Salzburg.Manninger made 33 appearances for Austria and played for Arsenal, mainly as a reserve, between 1997 and 2001. He ended his career at Liverpool during the 2016-17 season.In Italy, he played for Fiorentina, Torino, Bologna, Siena, Udinese and Juventus.“Alexander Manninger was an outstanding ambassador of Austrian football on and off the pitch,” OEFB sporting director Peter Schöttel said in a statement.“With his international career, he set standards and inspired and shaped many young goalkeepers. His professionalism, calmness and reliability made him an important part of his teams and the national side.”Published on Apr 16, 2026  #Austria #goalkeeper #Manninger #dies #aged #cartrain #collision

Post Comment