×
Ind vs SA T20I: A series that arrives with context attached  Five months ago, on the now hallowed turf of the D.Y. Patil Stadium, India and South Africa came face to face, with a shiny ICC ODI World Cup trophy propped between them. An epic final ensued, with momentum swinging wildly between the two challengers. Eventually, India entered a vortex of glory, one unexplored before, with a sea of blue chanting as it ascended the 50-over throne. The Proteas, meanwhile, were resigned to a familiar loop of despair.In 2023, Meg Lanning’s Australia denied the side World T20 glory in front of a heartbroken home crowd. In 2024, it was Sophie Devine’s White Ferns who blew the South Africans away into the Emirati desert. A third heartbreak, this time on Indian soil, can do one of two things: birth an almost vengeful pursuit of triumph or break the progress made so far. When the T20 World Cup comes around in June, this time in England, the ecosystem will have its answers.A credible dress rehearsal is on the cards when Harmanpreet Kaur and Co. fly to South Africa for a five-match T20I series starting April 17. This is the last bilateral series the Proteas will play before boarding the flight to England, leaving a 47-day gap before they take the field again in the World Cup. India, meanwhile, has squeezed in a T20I series against England, three matches that will aid acclimatisation and offer a more realistic picture of form and adaptability to conditions.Both sides are placed in Group 1 alongside Australia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and the Netherlands, with their encounter in the T20 showpiece scheduled for June 21 at Old Trafford in Manchester. The two nations have faced each other in 19 T20Is, with India winning 10, South Africa six, and three yielding no result.Since the 2024 World Cup, India has played four T20I series, against West Indies (home), England (away), Sri Lanka (home), and Australia (away), winning them all. A particularly historic result was beating six-time world T20 champion Australia in its own backyard 2-1, a series triumph Down Under that came after a decade. That the rest of the tour went remarkably abysmally is a conversation for another day.While the 2024 T20 World Cup came with experimentation en masse, with several debuts handed out, the Indian team one sees today is far more stable, working around a core group. Shafali Verma is back in the thick of things and is set to play her 100th T20I during the series. In the big picture, it is a heartening sign of how regular fixtures for this Indian women’s team, which once played a tour a year at times, have now become. Smriti Mandhana has found consistency, but the middle order still needs bolstering.Towards that end, young Anushka Sharma has been handed a maiden call-up after promising performances in the domestic circuit and in her debut Women’s Premier League season, where the 22-year-old offspin-bowling all-rounder impressed for Gujarat Giants by scoring 177 runs, with 124 of them coming in boundaries. Her fluency at No. 3 and scoring intent make her a solid alternative to Harleen Deol, whose strike rate and rotation have often drawn flak.Another interesting addition to the setup is Anushka’s Giants teammate Bharti Fulmali, who last featured for India in 2019. Her ability to accelerate lower down the order is a role she has prolifically essayed for Vidarbha and the Giants over the years. Consistency has often pushed her out of the reckoning, but the 2025 and 2026 WPL seasons saw her deliver in crunch situations, enough to earn the trust of the management. A partnership between her and Richa Ghosh could help India avoid the occasional drop in momentum in the slog overs, especially if wickets fall.India has dropped budding keeper-batter G. Kamalini, whose topsy-turvy debut against Sri Lanka showed that her glovework still needs fine-tuning. Uma Chetry returns, and while she is a stable presence behind the stumps, her batting returns are not like-for-like. The issue of Richa not having credible competition to keep her on her toes has been brewing for a few years now, particularly in her role lower down the order, and is something the think tank must address in the larger scheme of things.With the World Cup in pace-friendly England, India’s top priority will be sharpening its seam attack. Kranti Gaud, Arundhati Reddy, and Renuka Singh Thakur are joined by Kashvee Gautam, who will look to shake off injury interruptions and make a strong case for the Indian 15. This is particularly crucial given the careful workload management of Renuka and her limited utility with the bat. Kashvee, a handy batter who can hit long, adds depth to the lower order.For South Africa, two series wins have come in the five played: against relatively weaker teams like Ireland and Pakistan. With Marizanne Kapp’s workload being carefully managed, the bowling has looked a little blunt, allowing standout performances like Fatima Sana’s striking across formats and Amelia Kerr’s unbeaten 179 in a record-breaking ODI chase.The South African top order has been among the runs and will look to build consistency against a probing Indian attack before the World Cup. A fresh addition is Kayla Reyneke, who helped secure thrilling wins against Pakistan and New Zealand. Having led the U-19 setup, the off-spin allrounder will aim to cement her place. Another selection to watch is former captain Dane van Niekerk (pic, below), reintegrated as a pure batter. Questions around fitness and competition remain, but coach Mandla Mashimbyi will welcome this as a problem worth having. Onto Kingsmead!Published on Apr 16, 2026More stories from this issue  #Ind #T20I #series #arrives #context #attached

Ind vs SA T20I: A series that arrives with context attached

Five months ago, on the now hallowed turf of the D.Y. Patil Stadium, India and South Africa came face to face, with a shiny ICC ODI World Cup trophy propped between them. An epic final ensued, with momentum swinging wildly between the two challengers. Eventually, India entered a vortex of glory, one unexplored before, with a sea of blue chanting as it ascended the 50-over throne. The Proteas, meanwhile, were resigned to a familiar loop of despair.

In 2023, Meg Lanning’s Australia denied the side World T20 glory in front of a heartbroken home crowd. In 2024, it was Sophie Devine’s White Ferns who blew the South Africans away into the Emirati desert. A third heartbreak, this time on Indian soil, can do one of two things: birth an almost vengeful pursuit of triumph or break the progress made so far. When the T20 World Cup comes around in June, this time in England, the ecosystem will have its answers.

A credible dress rehearsal is on the cards when Harmanpreet Kaur and Co. fly to South Africa for a five-match T20I series starting April 17. This is the last bilateral series the Proteas will play before boarding the flight to England, leaving a 47-day gap before they take the field again in the World Cup. India, meanwhile, has squeezed in a T20I series against England, three matches that will aid acclimatisation and offer a more realistic picture of form and adaptability to conditions.

Both sides are placed in Group 1 alongside Australia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and the Netherlands, with their encounter in the T20 showpiece scheduled for June 21 at Old Trafford in Manchester. The two nations have faced each other in 19 T20Is, with India winning 10, South Africa six, and three yielding no result.

Since the 2024 World Cup, India has played four T20I series, against West Indies (home), England (away), Sri Lanka (home), and Australia (away), winning them all. A particularly historic result was beating six-time world T20 champion Australia in its own backyard 2-1, a series triumph Down Under that came after a decade. That the rest of the tour went remarkably abysmally is a conversation for another day.

While the 2024 T20 World Cup came with experimentation en masse, with several debuts handed out, the Indian team one sees today is far more stable, working around a core group. Shafali Verma is back in the thick of things and is set to play her 100th T20I during the series. In the big picture, it is a heartening sign of how regular fixtures for this Indian women’s team, which once played a tour a year at times, have now become. Smriti Mandhana has found consistency, but the middle order still needs bolstering.

Towards that end, young Anushka Sharma has been handed a maiden call-up after promising performances in the domestic circuit and in her debut Women’s Premier League season, where the 22-year-old offspin-bowling all-rounder impressed for Gujarat Giants by scoring 177 runs, with 124 of them coming in boundaries. Her fluency at No. 3 and scoring intent make her a solid alternative to Harleen Deol, whose strike rate and rotation have often drawn flak.

Another interesting addition to the setup is Anushka’s Giants teammate Bharti Fulmali, who last featured for India in 2019. Her ability to accelerate lower down the order is a role she has prolifically essayed for Vidarbha and the Giants over the years. Consistency has often pushed her out of the reckoning, but the 2025 and 2026 WPL seasons saw her deliver in crunch situations, enough to earn the trust of the management. A partnership between her and Richa Ghosh could help India avoid the occasional drop in momentum in the slog overs, especially if wickets fall.

India has dropped budding keeper-batter G. Kamalini, whose topsy-turvy debut against Sri Lanka showed that her glovework still needs fine-tuning. Uma Chetry returns, and while she is a stable presence behind the stumps, her batting returns are not like-for-like. The issue of Richa not having credible competition to keep her on her toes has been brewing for a few years now, particularly in her role lower down the order, and is something the think tank must address in the larger scheme of things.

With the World Cup in pace-friendly England, India’s top priority will be sharpening its seam attack. Kranti Gaud, Arundhati Reddy, and Renuka Singh Thakur are joined by Kashvee Gautam, who will look to shake off injury interruptions and make a strong case for the Indian 15. This is particularly crucial given the careful workload management of Renuka and her limited utility with the bat. Kashvee, a handy batter who can hit long, adds depth to the lower order.

For South Africa, two series wins have come in the five played: against relatively weaker teams like Ireland and Pakistan. With Marizanne Kapp’s workload being carefully managed, the bowling has looked a little blunt, allowing standout performances like Fatima Sana’s striking across formats and Amelia Kerr’s unbeaten 179 in a record-breaking ODI chase.

The South African top order has been among the runs and will look to build consistency against a probing Indian attack before the World Cup. A fresh addition is Kayla Reyneke, who helped secure thrilling wins against Pakistan and New Zealand. Having led the U-19 setup, the off-spin allrounder will aim to cement her place. Another selection to watch is former captain Dane van Niekerk (pic, below), reintegrated as a pure batter. Questions around fitness and competition remain, but coach Mandla Mashimbyi will welcome this as a problem worth having. Onto Kingsmead!

Published on Apr 16, 2026

More stories from this issue

#Ind #T20I #series #arrives #context #attached

Five months ago, on the now hallowed turf of the D.Y. Patil Stadium, India and South Africa came face to face, with a shiny ICC ODI World Cup trophy propped between them. An epic final ensued, with momentum swinging wildly between the two challengers. Eventually, India entered a vortex of glory, one unexplored before, with a sea of blue chanting as it ascended the 50-over throne. The Proteas, meanwhile, were resigned to a familiar loop of despair.

In 2023, Meg Lanning’s Australia denied the side World T20 glory in front of a heartbroken home crowd. In 2024, it was Sophie Devine’s White Ferns who blew the South Africans away into the Emirati desert. A third heartbreak, this time on Indian soil, can do one of two things: birth an almost vengeful pursuit of triumph or break the progress made so far. When the T20 World Cup comes around in June, this time in England, the ecosystem will have its answers.

A credible dress rehearsal is on the cards when Harmanpreet Kaur and Co. fly to South Africa for a five-match T20I series starting April 17. This is the last bilateral series the Proteas will play before boarding the flight to England, leaving a 47-day gap before they take the field again in the World Cup. India, meanwhile, has squeezed in a T20I series against England, three matches that will aid acclimatisation and offer a more realistic picture of form and adaptability to conditions.

Both sides are placed in Group 1 alongside Australia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and the Netherlands, with their encounter in the T20 showpiece scheduled for June 21 at Old Trafford in Manchester. The two nations have faced each other in 19 T20Is, with India winning 10, South Africa six, and three yielding no result.

Since the 2024 World Cup, India has played four T20I series, against West Indies (home), England (away), Sri Lanka (home), and Australia (away), winning them all. A particularly historic result was beating six-time world T20 champion Australia in its own backyard 2-1, a series triumph Down Under that came after a decade. That the rest of the tour went remarkably abysmally is a conversation for another day.

While the 2024 T20 World Cup came with experimentation en masse, with several debuts handed out, the Indian team one sees today is far more stable, working around a core group. Shafali Verma is back in the thick of things and is set to play her 100th T20I during the series. In the big picture, it is a heartening sign of how regular fixtures for this Indian women’s team, which once played a tour a year at times, have now become. Smriti Mandhana has found consistency, but the middle order still needs bolstering.

Towards that end, young Anushka Sharma has been handed a maiden call-up after promising performances in the domestic circuit and in her debut Women’s Premier League season, where the 22-year-old offspin-bowling all-rounder impressed for Gujarat Giants by scoring 177 runs, with 124 of them coming in boundaries. Her fluency at No. 3 and scoring intent make her a solid alternative to Harleen Deol, whose strike rate and rotation have often drawn flak.

Another interesting addition to the setup is Anushka’s Giants teammate Bharti Fulmali, who last featured for India in 2019. Her ability to accelerate lower down the order is a role she has prolifically essayed for Vidarbha and the Giants over the years. Consistency has often pushed her out of the reckoning, but the 2025 and 2026 WPL seasons saw her deliver in crunch situations, enough to earn the trust of the management. A partnership between her and Richa Ghosh could help India avoid the occasional drop in momentum in the slog overs, especially if wickets fall.

India has dropped budding keeper-batter G. Kamalini, whose topsy-turvy debut against Sri Lanka showed that her glovework still needs fine-tuning. Uma Chetry returns, and while she is a stable presence behind the stumps, her batting returns are not like-for-like. The issue of Richa not having credible competition to keep her on her toes has been brewing for a few years now, particularly in her role lower down the order, and is something the think tank must address in the larger scheme of things.

With the World Cup in pace-friendly England, India’s top priority will be sharpening its seam attack. Kranti Gaud, Arundhati Reddy, and Renuka Singh Thakur are joined by Kashvee Gautam, who will look to shake off injury interruptions and make a strong case for the Indian 15. This is particularly crucial given the careful workload management of Renuka and her limited utility with the bat. Kashvee, a handy batter who can hit long, adds depth to the lower order.

For South Africa, two series wins have come in the five played: against relatively weaker teams like Ireland and Pakistan. With Marizanne Kapp’s workload being carefully managed, the bowling has looked a little blunt, allowing standout performances like Fatima Sana’s striking across formats and Amelia Kerr’s unbeaten 179 in a record-breaking ODI chase.

The South African top order has been among the runs and will look to build consistency against a probing Indian attack before the World Cup. A fresh addition is Kayla Reyneke, who helped secure thrilling wins against Pakistan and New Zealand. Having led the U-19 setup, the off-spin allrounder will aim to cement her place. Another selection to watch is former captain Dane van Niekerk (pic, below), reintegrated as a pure batter. Questions around fitness and competition remain, but coach Mandla Mashimbyi will welcome this as a problem worth having. Onto Kingsmead!

Published on Apr 16, 2026

More stories from this issue

Source link
#Ind #T20I #series #arrives #context #attached

Previous post

Deadspin | WNBA draft second-most watched ever with 1.5M viewers <div id=""><section id="0" class=" w-full"><div class="xl:container mx-0 !px-4 py-0 pb-4 !mx-0 !px-0"><img src="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28723373.jpg" srcset="https://images.deadspin.com/tr:w-900/28723373.jpg" alt="WNBA: Draft" class="w-full" fetchpriority="high" loading="eager"/><span class="text-0.8 leading-tight">Apr 13, 2026; New York, NY, USA; WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert (left) hugs Azzi Fudd who was selected first overall by the Dallas Wings during the 2026 WNBA Draft at The Shed at Hudson Yards. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images<!-- --> <!-- --> </span></div></section><section id="section-1"> <p>With uncertainty over the identity of the top overall pick and new NCAA champion UCLA producing a record number of selections, the WNBA draft drew its second-highest viewership total ever on Monday.</p> </section><section id="section-2"> <p>According to ESPN, 1.5 million watched the event, a 20% increase from last year’s draft. The audience reached a peak of 1.79 million tuning in shortly before 8 p.m. ET.</p> </section><section id="section-3"> <p>The record viewership of 2.45 million was established in 2024, when college stars Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese went first and seventh overall, respectively.</p> </section><br/><section id="section-4"> <p>This year, the Dallas Wings chose UConn’s Azzi Fudd No. 1 overall. The Wings also had the first pick last year, which they used to select Fudd’s former UConn teammate, Paige Bueckers, who went on to win WNBA Rookie of the Year.</p> </section> <section id="section-5"> <p>The Bruins, who won their first NCAA title earlier this month, established WNBA draft records with five first-round picks and six total players chosen.</p> </section><section id="section-6"> <p>Lauren Betts (No. 4 to the Washington Mystics), Gabriela Jaquez (No. 5 to the Chicago Sky), Kiki Rice (No. 6 to the expansion Toronto Tempo), Angela Dugalic (No. 9 to the Washington Mystics) and Gianna Kneepkens (No. 15 to the Connecticut Sun) were first-round selections. Charlisse Leger-Walker was chosen with the third pick of the second round (No. 18 overall), by the Sun.</p> </section><section id="section-7"> <p>–Field Level Media</p> </section></div> #Deadspin #WNBA #draft #secondmost #watched #1.5M #viewers

Next post

Obnoxious Streamer, Johnny Somali, Sentenced To A Labor Camp In South Korea For Disrespecting A War Memorial

Should the Celtics Blow It Up? Analyzing Every Major Option | Deadspin.com  Feb 28, 2025; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens before their game against the Cleveland Cavaliers at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images   Everyone seems to have an opinion on how to “fix” the Celtics.You’ll probably not be surprised to hear I have a few myself. OK, more than just a few.Raising a 7-foot bar on a bunch of wishful thinking among Celtics fans and senseless knee-jerk reactions among the unfaithful, here’s where I stand on some of the more popular suggestions:Fire Brad Stevens.Let’s get the most ridiculous one out of the way.Stevens was NBA Executive of the Year this year for a reason. He did the seemingly impossible (or so Golden State tells us) … He got rid of a bunch of overpaid veterans, remained competitive even without Jayson Tatum for the most part, and restructured a roster that should be able to compete for Eastern titles for most of the next decade.Fire him? I say: Reward him.Fire Joe Mazzulla.He did such a great job during the regular season, he set himself up for a hard fall in the playoffs. And even at that, you have to wonder what might have happened had Tatum not contracted a case of Embiid-itis.Did he mismanage the Philadelphia series? Sure. The Pistons would have fired their coach if he’d done that. Maybe even the Knicks and Cavaliers. But they haven’t won a title, made the Finals twice and been a perennial contender for the better part of a decade.Based on the improbable regular season alone, Mazz deserves the benefit of the doubt. But don’t let it happen again.Trade Derrick White.On the surface, this one makes sense. As the 76ers series demonstrated, the Celtics could use a Robert Williams III type more than a White type. But that’s what Stevens, in a rare blunder, thought when he exchanged Anfernee Simons for Nikola Vucevic.Look at the Eastern Conference. When Joel Embiid isn’t playing – which is most of the time – the top players are almost all guards: Cade Cunningham, Jalen Brunson, Donovan Mitchell, James Harden, Tyrese Haliburton … You need somebody to slow them down.Yeah, the Celtics could move Jaylen Brown fulltime to the backcourt, but that likely would force Tatum to actually have to guard somebody. Giving Brown the tough frontcourt assignments allows Tatum to freelance, grab cheap rebounds and stay fresh for his late barrage of missed 3-pointers. Wait, that was supposed to be a positive.Trading White maybe gets you Wendell Carter Jr., but does that make you better? I say: Just bigger.Trade Jaylen Brown. May 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images    Let’s be honest: Breaking up the Brown/Tatum tandem would take a lot of guts. But after watching the Celtics play without Tatum for two-thirds of last season, it’s at least worth considering.So which one gets shopped? That depends what type of team you want.We’ve seen what the Celtics look like without Tatum – energetic, defensive-minded and all-inclusive on offense. And that’s without whatever high-level player or players you would get by trading Tatum.You turn Brown into, say, Naz Reid and Terrence Shannon Jr., and you improve defensively on the interior and offensively on the perimeter. But you lose what made the Celtics so fun to watch this season – the team’s best defender and emotional leader.I’d keep Brown.Trade Jayson Tatum.It might take just one call to turn the Celtics into the Eastern frontrunner again …Stevens: If we give you Tatum for Giannis, how many first-round picks would you want?Bucks GM Jon Horst: Let me get back to you on that.If the response is anything you can count on one hand, the Celtics’ off-season is complete.Tatum has done a lot of good things for this team, but he’s not in Giannis’ league. Few players are.The Celtics would get their interior force, a runner who would allow the team to pick up the pace and another elite shot-blocker who would make Boston the most well-rounded defensive force in the league, with White shadowing star little guys, Brown locked onto mid-sized scorers and Giannis pitching a tent in the middle.Stop dreaming? OK, then I’d settle for Domantas Sabonis and De’Andre Hunter.Stand pat.Stevens earned a nice, long vacation. Maybe he should take one.No phones. See you in October with the same pieces that made the Celtics the favorite in the Eastern playoffs. Even with Tatum at less than 100 percent.After all, it ain’t broke.Unless, of course: Brad, this is Horstie getting back to you …   #Celtics #Blow #Analyzing #Major #Option #Deadspin.comFeb 28, 2025; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens before their game against the Cleveland Cavaliers at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images

Everyone seems to have an opinion on how to “fix” the Celtics.

You’ll probably not be surprised to hear I have a few myself. OK, more than just a few.

Raising a 7-foot bar on a bunch of wishful thinking among Celtics fans and senseless knee-jerk reactions among the unfaithful, here’s where I stand on some of the more popular suggestions:

Fire Brad Stevens.

Let’s get the most ridiculous one out of the way.

Stevens was NBA Executive of the Year this year for a reason. He did the seemingly impossible (or so Golden State tells us) … He got rid of a bunch of overpaid veterans, remained competitive even without Jayson Tatum for the most part, and restructured a roster that should be able to compete for Eastern titles for most of the next decade.

Fire him? I say: Reward him.

Fire Joe Mazzulla.

He did such a great job during the regular season, he set himself up for a hard fall in the playoffs. And even at that, you have to wonder what might have happened had Tatum not contracted a case of Embiid-itis.

Did he mismanage the Philadelphia series? Sure. The Pistons would have fired their coach if he’d done that. Maybe even the Knicks and Cavaliers. But they haven’t won a title, made the Finals twice and been a perennial contender for the better part of a decade.

Based on the improbable regular season alone, Mazz deserves the benefit of the doubt. But don’t let it happen again.

Trade Derrick White.

On the surface, this one makes sense. As the 76ers series demonstrated, the Celtics could use a Robert Williams III type more than a White type. But that’s what Stevens, in a rare blunder, thought when he exchanged Anfernee Simons for Nikola Vucevic.

Look at the Eastern Conference. When Joel Embiid isn’t playing – which is most of the time – the top players are almost all guards: Cade Cunningham, Jalen Brunson, Donovan Mitchell, James Harden, Tyrese Haliburton … You need somebody to slow them down.

Yeah, the Celtics could move Jaylen Brown fulltime to the backcourt, but that likely would force Tatum to actually have to guard somebody. Giving Brown the tough frontcourt assignments allows Tatum to freelance, grab cheap rebounds and stay fresh for his late barrage of missed 3-pointers. Wait, that was supposed to be a positive.

Trading White maybe gets you Wendell Carter Jr., but does that make you better? I say: Just bigger.

Trade Jaylen Brown.


May 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn ImagesMay 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images

Let’s be honest: Breaking up the Brown/Tatum tandem would take a lot of guts. But after watching the Celtics play without Tatum for two-thirds of last season, it’s at least worth considering.

So which one gets shopped? That depends what type of team you want.

We’ve seen what the Celtics look like without Tatum – energetic, defensive-minded and all-inclusive on offense. And that’s without whatever high-level player or players you would get by trading Tatum.

You turn Brown into, say, Naz Reid and Terrence Shannon Jr., and you improve defensively on the interior and offensively on the perimeter. But you lose what made the Celtics so fun to watch this season – the team’s best defender and emotional leader.

I’d keep Brown.

Trade Jayson Tatum.

It might take just one call to turn the Celtics into the Eastern frontrunner again …

Stevens: If we give you Tatum for Giannis, how many first-round picks would you want?

Bucks GM Jon Horst: Let me get back to you on that.

If the response is anything you can count on one hand, the Celtics’ off-season is complete.

Tatum has done a lot of good things for this team, but he’s not in Giannis’ league. Few players are.

The Celtics would get their interior force, a runner who would allow the team to pick up the pace and another elite shot-blocker who would make Boston the most well-rounded defensive force in the league, with White shadowing star little guys, Brown locked onto mid-sized scorers and Giannis pitching a tent in the middle.

Stop dreaming? OK, then I’d settle for Domantas Sabonis and De’Andre Hunter.

Stand pat.

Stevens earned a nice, long vacation. Maybe he should take one.

No phones. See you in October with the same pieces that made the Celtics the favorite in the Eastern playoffs. Even with Tatum at less than 100 percent.

After all, it ain’t broke.

Unless, of course: Brad, this is Horstie getting back to you …

#Celtics #Blow #Analyzing #Major #Option #Deadspin.com">Should the Celtics Blow It Up? Analyzing Every Major Option | Deadspin.com  Feb 28, 2025; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens before their game against the Cleveland Cavaliers at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images   Everyone seems to have an opinion on how to “fix” the Celtics.You’ll probably not be surprised to hear I have a few myself. OK, more than just a few.Raising a 7-foot bar on a bunch of wishful thinking among Celtics fans and senseless knee-jerk reactions among the unfaithful, here’s where I stand on some of the more popular suggestions:Fire Brad Stevens.Let’s get the most ridiculous one out of the way.Stevens was NBA Executive of the Year this year for a reason. He did the seemingly impossible (or so Golden State tells us) … He got rid of a bunch of overpaid veterans, remained competitive even without Jayson Tatum for the most part, and restructured a roster that should be able to compete for Eastern titles for most of the next decade.Fire him? I say: Reward him.Fire Joe Mazzulla.He did such a great job during the regular season, he set himself up for a hard fall in the playoffs. And even at that, you have to wonder what might have happened had Tatum not contracted a case of Embiid-itis.Did he mismanage the Philadelphia series? Sure. The Pistons would have fired their coach if he’d done that. Maybe even the Knicks and Cavaliers. But they haven’t won a title, made the Finals twice and been a perennial contender for the better part of a decade.Based on the improbable regular season alone, Mazz deserves the benefit of the doubt. But don’t let it happen again.Trade Derrick White.On the surface, this one makes sense. As the 76ers series demonstrated, the Celtics could use a Robert Williams III type more than a White type. But that’s what Stevens, in a rare blunder, thought when he exchanged Anfernee Simons for Nikola Vucevic.Look at the Eastern Conference. When Joel Embiid isn’t playing – which is most of the time – the top players are almost all guards: Cade Cunningham, Jalen Brunson, Donovan Mitchell, James Harden, Tyrese Haliburton … You need somebody to slow them down.Yeah, the Celtics could move Jaylen Brown fulltime to the backcourt, but that likely would force Tatum to actually have to guard somebody. Giving Brown the tough frontcourt assignments allows Tatum to freelance, grab cheap rebounds and stay fresh for his late barrage of missed 3-pointers. Wait, that was supposed to be a positive.Trading White maybe gets you Wendell Carter Jr., but does that make you better? I say: Just bigger.Trade Jaylen Brown. May 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images    Let’s be honest: Breaking up the Brown/Tatum tandem would take a lot of guts. But after watching the Celtics play without Tatum for two-thirds of last season, it’s at least worth considering.So which one gets shopped? That depends what type of team you want.We’ve seen what the Celtics look like without Tatum – energetic, defensive-minded and all-inclusive on offense. And that’s without whatever high-level player or players you would get by trading Tatum.You turn Brown into, say, Naz Reid and Terrence Shannon Jr., and you improve defensively on the interior and offensively on the perimeter. But you lose what made the Celtics so fun to watch this season – the team’s best defender and emotional leader.I’d keep Brown.Trade Jayson Tatum.It might take just one call to turn the Celtics into the Eastern frontrunner again …Stevens: If we give you Tatum for Giannis, how many first-round picks would you want?Bucks GM Jon Horst: Let me get back to you on that.If the response is anything you can count on one hand, the Celtics’ off-season is complete.Tatum has done a lot of good things for this team, but he’s not in Giannis’ league. Few players are.The Celtics would get their interior force, a runner who would allow the team to pick up the pace and another elite shot-blocker who would make Boston the most well-rounded defensive force in the league, with White shadowing star little guys, Brown locked onto mid-sized scorers and Giannis pitching a tent in the middle.Stop dreaming? OK, then I’d settle for Domantas Sabonis and De’Andre Hunter.Stand pat.Stevens earned a nice, long vacation. Maybe he should take one.No phones. See you in October with the same pieces that made the Celtics the favorite in the Eastern playoffs. Even with Tatum at less than 100 percent.After all, it ain’t broke.Unless, of course: Brad, this is Horstie getting back to you …   #Celtics #Blow #Analyzing #Major #Option #Deadspin.com

NBA Executive of the Year this year for a reason. He did the seemingly impossible (or so Golden State tells us) … He got rid of a bunch of overpaid veterans, remained competitive even without Jayson Tatum for the most part, and restructured a roster that should be able to compete for Eastern titles for most of the next decade.

Fire him? I say: Reward him.

Fire Joe Mazzulla.

He did such a great job during the regular season, he set himself up for a hard fall in the playoffs. And even at that, you have to wonder what might have happened had Tatum not contracted a case of Embiid-itis.

Did he mismanage the Philadelphia series? Sure. The Pistons would have fired their coach if he’d done that. Maybe even the Knicks and Cavaliers. But they haven’t won a title, made the Finals twice and been a perennial contender for the better part of a decade.

Based on the improbable regular season alone, Mazz deserves the benefit of the doubt. But don’t let it happen again.

Trade Derrick White.

On the surface, this one makes sense. As the 76ers series demonstrated, the Celtics could use a Robert Williams III type more than a White type. But that’s what Stevens, in a rare blunder, thought when he exchanged Anfernee Simons for Nikola Vucevic.

Look at the Eastern Conference. When Joel Embiid isn’t playing – which is most of the time – the top players are almost all guards: Cade Cunningham, Jalen Brunson, Donovan Mitchell, James Harden, Tyrese Haliburton … You need somebody to slow them down.

Yeah, the Celtics could move Jaylen Brown fulltime to the backcourt, but that likely would force Tatum to actually have to guard somebody. Giving Brown the tough frontcourt assignments allows Tatum to freelance, grab cheap rebounds and stay fresh for his late barrage of missed 3-pointers. Wait, that was supposed to be a positive.

Trading White maybe gets you Wendell Carter Jr., but does that make you better? I say: Just bigger.

Trade Jaylen Brown.


May 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn ImagesMay 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images

Let’s be honest: Breaking up the Brown/Tatum tandem would take a lot of guts. But after watching the Celtics play without Tatum for two-thirds of last season, it’s at least worth considering.

So which one gets shopped? That depends what type of team you want.

We’ve seen what the Celtics look like without Tatum – energetic, defensive-minded and all-inclusive on offense. And that’s without whatever high-level player or players you would get by trading Tatum.

You turn Brown into, say, Naz Reid and Terrence Shannon Jr., and you improve defensively on the interior and offensively on the perimeter. But you lose what made the Celtics so fun to watch this season – the team’s best defender and emotional leader.

I’d keep Brown.

Trade Jayson Tatum.

It might take just one call to turn the Celtics into the Eastern frontrunner again …

Stevens: If we give you Tatum for Giannis, how many first-round picks would you want?

Bucks GM Jon Horst: Let me get back to you on that.

If the response is anything you can count on one hand, the Celtics’ off-season is complete.

Tatum has done a lot of good things for this team, but he’s not in Giannis’ league. Few players are.

The Celtics would get their interior force, a runner who would allow the team to pick up the pace and another elite shot-blocker who would make Boston the most well-rounded defensive force in the league, with White shadowing star little guys, Brown locked onto mid-sized scorers and Giannis pitching a tent in the middle.

Stop dreaming? OK, then I’d settle for Domantas Sabonis and De’Andre Hunter.

Stand pat.

Stevens earned a nice, long vacation. Maybe he should take one.

No phones. See you in October with the same pieces that made the Celtics the favorite in the Eastern playoffs. Even with Tatum at less than 100 percent.

After all, it ain’t broke.

Unless, of course: Brad, this is Horstie getting back to you …

#Celtics #Blow #Analyzing #Major #Option #Deadspin.com">Should the Celtics Blow It Up? Analyzing Every Major Option | Deadspin.com
Should the Celtics Blow It Up? Analyzing Every Major Option | Deadspin.com  Feb 28, 2025; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens before their game against the Cleveland Cavaliers at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images   Everyone seems to have an opinion on how to “fix” the Celtics.You’ll probably not be surprised to hear I have a few myself. OK, more than just a few.Raising a 7-foot bar on a bunch of wishful thinking among Celtics fans and senseless knee-jerk reactions among the unfaithful, here’s where I stand on some of the more popular suggestions:Fire Brad Stevens.Let’s get the most ridiculous one out of the way.Stevens was NBA Executive of the Year this year for a reason. He did the seemingly impossible (or so Golden State tells us) … He got rid of a bunch of overpaid veterans, remained competitive even without Jayson Tatum for the most part, and restructured a roster that should be able to compete for Eastern titles for most of the next decade.Fire him? I say: Reward him.Fire Joe Mazzulla.He did such a great job during the regular season, he set himself up for a hard fall in the playoffs. And even at that, you have to wonder what might have happened had Tatum not contracted a case of Embiid-itis.Did he mismanage the Philadelphia series? Sure. The Pistons would have fired their coach if he’d done that. Maybe even the Knicks and Cavaliers. But they haven’t won a title, made the Finals twice and been a perennial contender for the better part of a decade.Based on the improbable regular season alone, Mazz deserves the benefit of the doubt. But don’t let it happen again.Trade Derrick White.On the surface, this one makes sense. As the 76ers series demonstrated, the Celtics could use a Robert Williams III type more than a White type. But that’s what Stevens, in a rare blunder, thought when he exchanged Anfernee Simons for Nikola Vucevic.Look at the Eastern Conference. When Joel Embiid isn’t playing – which is most of the time – the top players are almost all guards: Cade Cunningham, Jalen Brunson, Donovan Mitchell, James Harden, Tyrese Haliburton … You need somebody to slow them down.Yeah, the Celtics could move Jaylen Brown fulltime to the backcourt, but that likely would force Tatum to actually have to guard somebody. Giving Brown the tough frontcourt assignments allows Tatum to freelance, grab cheap rebounds and stay fresh for his late barrage of missed 3-pointers. Wait, that was supposed to be a positive.Trading White maybe gets you Wendell Carter Jr., but does that make you better? I say: Just bigger.Trade Jaylen Brown. May 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images    Let’s be honest: Breaking up the Brown/Tatum tandem would take a lot of guts. But after watching the Celtics play without Tatum for two-thirds of last season, it’s at least worth considering.So which one gets shopped? That depends what type of team you want.We’ve seen what the Celtics look like without Tatum – energetic, defensive-minded and all-inclusive on offense. And that’s without whatever high-level player or players you would get by trading Tatum.You turn Brown into, say, Naz Reid and Terrence Shannon Jr., and you improve defensively on the interior and offensively on the perimeter. But you lose what made the Celtics so fun to watch this season – the team’s best defender and emotional leader.I’d keep Brown.Trade Jayson Tatum.It might take just one call to turn the Celtics into the Eastern frontrunner again …Stevens: If we give you Tatum for Giannis, how many first-round picks would you want?Bucks GM Jon Horst: Let me get back to you on that.If the response is anything you can count on one hand, the Celtics’ off-season is complete.Tatum has done a lot of good things for this team, but he’s not in Giannis’ league. Few players are.The Celtics would get their interior force, a runner who would allow the team to pick up the pace and another elite shot-blocker who would make Boston the most well-rounded defensive force in the league, with White shadowing star little guys, Brown locked onto mid-sized scorers and Giannis pitching a tent in the middle.Stop dreaming? OK, then I’d settle for Domantas Sabonis and De’Andre Hunter.Stand pat.Stevens earned a nice, long vacation. Maybe he should take one.No phones. See you in October with the same pieces that made the Celtics the favorite in the Eastern playoffs. Even with Tatum at less than 100 percent.After all, it ain’t broke.Unless, of course: Brad, this is Horstie getting back to you …   #Celtics #Blow #Analyzing #Major #Option #Deadspin.comFeb 28, 2025; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens before their game against the Cleveland Cavaliers at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images

Everyone seems to have an opinion on how to “fix” the Celtics.

You’ll probably not be surprised to hear I have a few myself. OK, more than just a few.

Raising a 7-foot bar on a bunch of wishful thinking among Celtics fans and senseless knee-jerk reactions among the unfaithful, here’s where I stand on some of the more popular suggestions:

Fire Brad Stevens.

Let’s get the most ridiculous one out of the way.

Stevens was NBA Executive of the Year this year for a reason. He did the seemingly impossible (or so Golden State tells us) … He got rid of a bunch of overpaid veterans, remained competitive even without Jayson Tatum for the most part, and restructured a roster that should be able to compete for Eastern titles for most of the next decade.

Fire him? I say: Reward him.

Fire Joe Mazzulla.

He did such a great job during the regular season, he set himself up for a hard fall in the playoffs. And even at that, you have to wonder what might have happened had Tatum not contracted a case of Embiid-itis.

Did he mismanage the Philadelphia series? Sure. The Pistons would have fired their coach if he’d done that. Maybe even the Knicks and Cavaliers. But they haven’t won a title, made the Finals twice and been a perennial contender for the better part of a decade.

Based on the improbable regular season alone, Mazz deserves the benefit of the doubt. But don’t let it happen again.

Trade Derrick White.

On the surface, this one makes sense. As the 76ers series demonstrated, the Celtics could use a Robert Williams III type more than a White type. But that’s what Stevens, in a rare blunder, thought when he exchanged Anfernee Simons for Nikola Vucevic.

Look at the Eastern Conference. When Joel Embiid isn’t playing – which is most of the time – the top players are almost all guards: Cade Cunningham, Jalen Brunson, Donovan Mitchell, James Harden, Tyrese Haliburton … You need somebody to slow them down.

Yeah, the Celtics could move Jaylen Brown fulltime to the backcourt, but that likely would force Tatum to actually have to guard somebody. Giving Brown the tough frontcourt assignments allows Tatum to freelance, grab cheap rebounds and stay fresh for his late barrage of missed 3-pointers. Wait, that was supposed to be a positive.

Trading White maybe gets you Wendell Carter Jr., but does that make you better? I say: Just bigger.

Trade Jaylen Brown.


May 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn ImagesMay 2, 2026; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Philadelphia 76ers guard Tyrese Maxey (0) talks with Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7)after Philadephia’s win in game seven of the first round of the 2026 NBA Playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Winslow Townson-Imagn Images

Let’s be honest: Breaking up the Brown/Tatum tandem would take a lot of guts. But after watching the Celtics play without Tatum for two-thirds of last season, it’s at least worth considering.

So which one gets shopped? That depends what type of team you want.

We’ve seen what the Celtics look like without Tatum – energetic, defensive-minded and all-inclusive on offense. And that’s without whatever high-level player or players you would get by trading Tatum.

You turn Brown into, say, Naz Reid and Terrence Shannon Jr., and you improve defensively on the interior and offensively on the perimeter. But you lose what made the Celtics so fun to watch this season – the team’s best defender and emotional leader.

I’d keep Brown.

Trade Jayson Tatum.

It might take just one call to turn the Celtics into the Eastern frontrunner again …

Stevens: If we give you Tatum for Giannis, how many first-round picks would you want?

Bucks GM Jon Horst: Let me get back to you on that.

If the response is anything you can count on one hand, the Celtics’ off-season is complete.

Tatum has done a lot of good things for this team, but he’s not in Giannis’ league. Few players are.

The Celtics would get their interior force, a runner who would allow the team to pick up the pace and another elite shot-blocker who would make Boston the most well-rounded defensive force in the league, with White shadowing star little guys, Brown locked onto mid-sized scorers and Giannis pitching a tent in the middle.

Stop dreaming? OK, then I’d settle for Domantas Sabonis and De’Andre Hunter.

Stand pat.

Stevens earned a nice, long vacation. Maybe he should take one.

No phones. See you in October with the same pieces that made the Celtics the favorite in the Eastern playoffs. Even with Tatum at less than 100 percent.

After all, it ain’t broke.

Unless, of course: Brad, this is Horstie getting back to you …

#Celtics #Blow #Analyzing #Major #Option #Deadspin.com

McKenna was viewed as the grand prize for much of the 2025-26 season. The rangy left wing already has good height, great playmaking, and a knack for driving the pace from the wing — making him a low-risk top overall pick. At times he’s been compared to Connor Bedard and Macklin Celebrini, though personally, I don’t think he has quite the same ceiling as either phenom. Still, he’s a franchise cornerstone player, and it will be interesting to see whether a team chooses to keep him at his natural LW, or tries to convert him into a center.

The choice at No. 1 will be between McKenna and Sweden’s Ivar Stenberg, who has been racing up the boards as scouts take a deeper look into his run in the SHL. It’s unusual for a true 18-year-old to have any modicum of success in a pro league, but Stenberg more than held his own with his hockey IQ, and a shot volume that routinely made him one of the biggest threats on the ice for Frölunda HC. That pro-readiness is appealing for a team looking for an immediate impact, and his polish could cause him to be the top overall pick.

We’ll take a deeper dive into this year’s class as the draft approaches, but for now here’s a rapid-fire mock draft involving the teams in the lottery for the 2026 NHL Draft.

As a reminder, these were the lottery odds for winning the first draw entering Tuesday night.

Vancouver Canucks — 18.5%
Chicago Blackhawks — 13.5%
New York Rangers — 11.5%
Calgary Flames — 9.5%
Toronto Maple Leafs (Top 5 protected to Bruins) — 8.5%
Seattle Kraken — 7.5%
Winnipeg Jets — 6.5%
Florida Panthers — 6.0%
San Jose Sharks — 5.0%
Nashville Predators — 3.5%
St. Louis Blues — 3.0%
New Jersey Devils — 2.5%
New York Islanders — 2.0%
Columbus Blue Jackets — 1.5%
St. Louis Blues (from Red Wings) — 0.5%
Washington Capitals — 0.5%

#NHL #mock #draft #Instant #projection #Maple #Leafs #win #lottery">NHL mock draft 2026: Instant projection after Maple Leafs win lottery  The Stanley Cup Playoffs roll on, but on Tuesday night the league conducted the 2026 NHL Draft lottery with the Toronto Maple Leafs winning the No. 1 pick, and the right to draft either Gavin McKenna or Ivar Stenberg in a class with more parity at the top than originally expected.McKenna was viewed as the grand prize for much of the 2025-26 season. The rangy left wing already has good height, great playmaking, and a knack for driving the pace from the wing — making him a low-risk top overall pick. At times he’s been compared to Connor Bedard and Macklin Celebrini, though personally, I don’t think he has quite the same ceiling as either phenom. Still, he’s a franchise cornerstone player, and it will be interesting to see whether a team chooses to keep him at his natural LW, or tries to convert him into a center.The choice at No. 1 will be between McKenna and Sweden’s Ivar Stenberg, who has been racing up the boards as scouts take a deeper look into his run in the SHL. It’s unusual for a true 18-year-old to have any modicum of success in a pro league, but Stenberg more than held his own with his hockey IQ, and a shot volume that routinely made him one of the biggest threats on the ice for Frölunda HC. That pro-readiness is appealing for a team looking for an immediate impact, and his polish could cause him to be the top overall pick.We’ll take a deeper dive into this year’s class as the draft approaches, but for now here’s a rapid-fire mock draft involving the teams in the lottery for the 2026 NHL Draft.As a reminder, these were the lottery odds for winning the first draw entering Tuesday night.Vancouver Canucks — 18.5%Chicago Blackhawks — 13.5%New York Rangers — 11.5%Calgary Flames — 9.5%Toronto Maple Leafs (Top 5 protected to Bruins) — 8.5%Seattle Kraken — 7.5%Winnipeg Jets — 6.5%Florida Panthers — 6.0%San Jose Sharks — 5.0%Nashville Predators — 3.5%St. Louis Blues — 3.0%New Jersey Devils — 2.5%New York Islanders — 2.0%Columbus Blue Jackets — 1.5%St. Louis Blues (from Red Wings) — 0.5%Washington Capitals — 0.5%  #NHL #mock #draft #Instant #projection #Maple #Leafs #win #lottery

Post Comment