×
The Billionaire Space Race Is Really Heating Up

The Billionaire Space Race Is Really Heating Up

As the U.S. races China to the Moon, two billionaires are locked in a space race of their own. NASA has offered both Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin a chance to return astronauts to the lunar surface, and the competition just got interesting.

A bombshell report by Ars Technica’s Eric Berger has revealed exactly how Blue Origin plans to beat SpaceX to a crewed Moon landing. Internal documents obtained by Ars reportedly detail the accelerated mission architecture Blue Origin will use to attempt to land astronauts on the Moon without the highly complex orbital refueling SpaceX’s approach requires.

Gizmodo could not independently verify the contents of the documents Ars reviewed, and Blue Origin did not respond to a request for comment.

The rivalry ramps up

Before we dive into Blue Origin’s new lunar strategy, a bit of context. On Sunday, Musk sent shockwaves through the spaceflight community by announcing that SpaceX—a company built on its founder’s dream of colonizing Mars—has pivoted toward building a Moon city instead.

The move marks a seismic shift in the company’s strategic vision. After all, it was only a year ago that Musk called the Moon a “distraction,” insisting that SpaceX is “going straight to Mars.” Still, it’s not altogether surprising, as Musk’s company is currently at risk of losing its Artemis 3 lunar lander contract to Blue Origin.

The morning after Musk announced SpaceX’s Moon pivot, Bezos posted an ominous photo of a turtle peering out from the shadows (this is relevant—promise). As Berger insightfully points out, the image—unccompanied by text—is almost certainly a nod to Blue Origin’s mascot: a tortoise. Bezos has previously explained that the tortoise is a reference to “The Tortoise and the Hare,” one of Aesop’s Fables.

It appears that in his eyes, Blue is the tortoise that will beat SpaceX—the hare—to a crewed lunar landing through slow and steady development.

NASA’s Artemis 3 mission will be the first to return humans to the Moon since the Apollo era. In 2021, the agency contracted SpaceX to build a crew lander for the mission, called the Starship Human Landing System (HLS). NASA originally hoped the lander would be ready in time to launch Artemis 3 by 2024, but significant developmental delays pushed the mission back to 2028 and prompted the agency to reopen the contract in October.

Since then, Blue has emerged as SpaceX’s competitor for the Artemis 3 lander contract. Bezos’s company is actively prepping its Blue Moon Mark 1 (MK1) cargo lander for its first test flight, slated to launch this year. Its success would pave the way for the MK2 crew lander, and if that vehicle is ready to fly before the Starship HLS, Musk can kiss his Artemis 3 contract goodbye.

Blue Origin’s new plan

Here’s how Blue Origin plans to pull this off. The documents reviewed by Ars reportedly detail two missions: an uncrewed demo mission and a crewed demo landing.

Berger reports that the uncrewed flight will require three launches of Blue’s New Glenn rocket. The first two will put two “transfer stages” (specialized upper stages designed to move a vehicle from one orbit to another) into low-Earth orbit, and the third will put a smaller version of the MK2 lander, called “Blue Moon MK2-IL,” into orbit. These three vehicles will dock to each other and the first transfer stage will boost them into an elliptical orbit around Earth.

The first stage will then separate and fall back to Earth, burning up in the atmosphere. That’s when the second transfer stage will take over, boosting the MK2-IL lander into an elliptical orbit around the Moon. The lander will then separate, descend to the lunar surface, and ascend back into low-lunar orbit.

The crewed landing will require four New Glenn launches, three to put three transfer stages into LEO and a fourth to launch MK2-IL and a docking port. All four vehicles will dock to the port. The first transfer stage will boost the stack into an elliptical Earth orbit, and the second will push it to rendezvous with NASA’s Orion spacecraft—carrying a crew of astronauts—in a specialized, highly stable orbit around the Moon.

Orion will dock with MK2-IL to allow the crew to board. The third transfer stage will then move MK2-IL into a low-lunar orbit and separate, allowing the lander to descend to the lunar surface and then ascend to re-rendezvous with Orion.

Sounds easy enough, right? Not quite. While this approach will not require orbital refueling, Blue Origin still must prove it can pull off complex dockings and deep-space maneuvers it has never attempted before, as Berger notes. So while Blue Origin is aiming for an uncrewed Moon landing later this year—potentially ahead of SpaceX’s 2027 target—both companies remain far from the finish line.

Source link
#Billionaire #Space #Race #Heating


It’s been almost two years since Disney and Lucasfilm canceled The Acolyte, and pretty much everything we’ve heard about the show since has seemed to refute the backlash—with Disney citing cost concerns rather than issues of quality, to the show itself ending up being Disney+’s second biggest show of 2024. Now, even with plenty more new Star Wars to watch since, it looks like the show’s still proving there was a demand for its ideas beneath the noise.

This week Flix Patrol reported that The Acolyte returned to the top 10 streamed shows on Disney+ in the United States this week. On the one hand, it’s not too surprising—more new Star Wars typically leads to people watching old Star Wars as well, and the current number one show on the list is Maul: Shadow Lord. Given the two shows’ parallels of examining the dark side, there’s certainly some crossover audience there, but it’s still interesting that it was Acolyte that pulled ahead more so than any other Star Wars show if Maul was the proverbial rising tide.

Maybe the show is helped by being so far removed from the elevated controversy over itthe grifters who declared it the worst thing in the world have moved on to other cycles and suddenly no longer fervently care about the age of Ki-Adi-Mundi, that’s for certain. Maybe, really, part of the fact that it’s a one-and-done thing people can check out as a “complete” story makes it easier to jump into.

But without the noise that dogged Acolyte throughout its broadcast—noise Disney rarely, if ever, did much to try and abate—maybe people can just start seeing The Acolyte for what it was: a messy show with interesting ideas that deserved time to forge those ideas into something even bigger. Alas, we’ll have to make do with people seeing what it was all about in hindsight.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#People #Watching #AcolyteLUCASFILM,Star Wars,The Acolyte">People Just Keep Watching ‘The Acolyte’
                It’s been almost two years since Disney and Lucasfilm canceled The Acolyte, and pretty much everything we’ve heard about the show since has seemed to refute the backlash—with Disney citing cost concerns rather than issues of quality, to the show itself ending up being Disney+’s second biggest show of 2024. Now, even with plenty more new Star Wars to watch since, it looks like the show’s still proving there was a demand for its ideas beneath the noise. This week Flix Patrol reported that The Acolyte returned to the top 10 streamed shows on Disney+ in the United States this week. On the one hand, it’s not too surprising—more new Star Wars typically leads to people watching old Star Wars as well, and the current number one show on the list is Maul: Shadow Lord. Given the two shows’ parallels of examining the dark side, there’s certainly some crossover audience there, but it’s still interesting that it was Acolyte that pulled ahead more so than any other Star Wars show if Maul was the proverbial rising tide.

 Maybe the show is helped by being so far removed from the elevated controversy over it—the grifters who declared it the worst thing in the world have moved on to other cycles and suddenly no longer fervently care about the age of Ki-Adi-Mundi, that’s for certain. Maybe, really, part of the fact that it’s a one-and-done thing people can check out as a “complete” story makes it easier to jump into. But without the noise that dogged Acolyte throughout its broadcast—noise Disney rarely, if ever, did much to try and abate—maybe people can just start seeing The Acolyte for what it was: a messy show with interesting ideas that deserved time to forge those ideas into something even bigger. Alas, we’ll have to make do with people seeing what it was all about in hindsight.  Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.      #People #Watching #AcolyteLUCASFILM,Star Wars,The Acolyte

canceled The Acolyte, and pretty much everything we’ve heard about the show since has seemed to refute the backlash—with Disney citing cost concerns rather than issues of quality, to the show itself ending up being Disney+’s second biggest show of 2024. Now, even with plenty more new Star Wars to watch since, it looks like the show’s still proving there was a demand for its ideas beneath the noise.

This week Flix Patrol reported that The Acolyte returned to the top 10 streamed shows on Disney+ in the United States this week. On the one hand, it’s not too surprising—more new Star Wars typically leads to people watching old Star Wars as well, and the current number one show on the list is Maul: Shadow Lord. Given the two shows’ parallels of examining the dark side, there’s certainly some crossover audience there, but it’s still interesting that it was Acolyte that pulled ahead more so than any other Star Wars show if Maul was the proverbial rising tide.

Maybe the show is helped by being so far removed from the elevated controversy over itthe grifters who declared it the worst thing in the world have moved on to other cycles and suddenly no longer fervently care about the age of Ki-Adi-Mundi, that’s for certain. Maybe, really, part of the fact that it’s a one-and-done thing people can check out as a “complete” story makes it easier to jump into.

But without the noise that dogged Acolyte throughout its broadcast—noise Disney rarely, if ever, did much to try and abate—maybe people can just start seeing The Acolyte for what it was: a messy show with interesting ideas that deserved time to forge those ideas into something even bigger. Alas, we’ll have to make do with people seeing what it was all about in hindsight.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#People #Watching #AcolyteLUCASFILM,Star Wars,The Acolyte">People Just Keep Watching ‘The Acolyte’People Just Keep Watching ‘The Acolyte’
                It’s been almost two years since Disney and Lucasfilm canceled The Acolyte, and pretty much everything we’ve heard about the show since has seemed to refute the backlash—with Disney citing cost concerns rather than issues of quality, to the show itself ending up being Disney+’s second biggest show of 2024. Now, even with plenty more new Star Wars to watch since, it looks like the show’s still proving there was a demand for its ideas beneath the noise. This week Flix Patrol reported that The Acolyte returned to the top 10 streamed shows on Disney+ in the United States this week. On the one hand, it’s not too surprising—more new Star Wars typically leads to people watching old Star Wars as well, and the current number one show on the list is Maul: Shadow Lord. Given the two shows’ parallels of examining the dark side, there’s certainly some crossover audience there, but it’s still interesting that it was Acolyte that pulled ahead more so than any other Star Wars show if Maul was the proverbial rising tide.

 Maybe the show is helped by being so far removed from the elevated controversy over it—the grifters who declared it the worst thing in the world have moved on to other cycles and suddenly no longer fervently care about the age of Ki-Adi-Mundi, that’s for certain. Maybe, really, part of the fact that it’s a one-and-done thing people can check out as a “complete” story makes it easier to jump into. But without the noise that dogged Acolyte throughout its broadcast—noise Disney rarely, if ever, did much to try and abate—maybe people can just start seeing The Acolyte for what it was: a messy show with interesting ideas that deserved time to forge those ideas into something even bigger. Alas, we’ll have to make do with people seeing what it was all about in hindsight.  Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.      #People #Watching #AcolyteLUCASFILM,Star Wars,The Acolyte

It’s been almost two years since Disney and Lucasfilm canceled The Acolyte, and pretty much everything we’ve heard about the show since has seemed to refute the backlash—with Disney citing cost concerns rather than issues of quality, to the show itself ending up being Disney+’s second biggest show of 2024. Now, even with plenty more new Star Wars to watch since, it looks like the show’s still proving there was a demand for its ideas beneath the noise.

This week Flix Patrol reported that The Acolyte returned to the top 10 streamed shows on Disney+ in the United States this week. On the one hand, it’s not too surprising—more new Star Wars typically leads to people watching old Star Wars as well, and the current number one show on the list is Maul: Shadow Lord. Given the two shows’ parallels of examining the dark side, there’s certainly some crossover audience there, but it’s still interesting that it was Acolyte that pulled ahead more so than any other Star Wars show if Maul was the proverbial rising tide.

Maybe the show is helped by being so far removed from the elevated controversy over itthe grifters who declared it the worst thing in the world have moved on to other cycles and suddenly no longer fervently care about the age of Ki-Adi-Mundi, that’s for certain. Maybe, really, part of the fact that it’s a one-and-done thing people can check out as a “complete” story makes it easier to jump into.

But without the noise that dogged Acolyte throughout its broadcast—noise Disney rarely, if ever, did much to try and abate—maybe people can just start seeing The Acolyte for what it was: a messy show with interesting ideas that deserved time to forge those ideas into something even bigger. Alas, we’ll have to make do with people seeing what it was all about in hindsight.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#People #Watching #AcolyteLUCASFILM,Star Wars,The Acolyte

robot vacuum.

Fluffy Face

Image may contain Indoors Interior Design Gun and Weapon

Photograph: Nena Farrell

Image may contain Indoors Interior Design Racket Sport Tennis and Tennis Racket

Photograph: Nena Farrell

This vacuum’s full name is the Dyson PencilVac Fluffycones, aptly named for the four fluffy cones inside the vacuum head. Dyson’s previous recent stick vacuums all have the Fluffy Optic cleaner head for vacuuming hard floors. While both have a fluffy roller bar, the Fluffycones have a conical shape that Dyson says will detangle and remove hair rather than the hair getting stuck all around it. It did detangle hair for me, but when I vacuumed up larger portions of hair from my bathroom floor (a place where many a stray hair comes to die at the hands of my hairbrush, comb, and towel), it actually bunched up the hair into a ball and spat it back out a few times before finally sucking it up into the dustbin.

Video: Nena Farrell

While the hair results weren’t great, I did love this vacuum for sucking up the cat litter that constantly plagues my home. It did a great job with flour on my hard floors and a solid job with dry oats, but it occasionally just bumped the oats around instead of immediately sucking them up. I was even able to quickly run it over the top of my carpet, but rolling back and forth on the carpet a bunch did stop the cones.

The head is designed to move in just about any direction. The cones make it easy to swivel around, and the green illuminating lights on the front and back help you spot any debris you might otherwise miss. With its compact size that fits in tricky corners, the PencilVac finally lets me vacuum up all the litter around the base of my toilet and pedestal sink. It’s part of what makes me reach for this vacuum over and over, even after my robot vacuum cleaned the day before.

Forward Momentum

Image may contain Baseball Baseball Bat Sport Baton Stick Racket Tennis and Tennis Racket

Photograph: Nena Farrell

Do I think this vacuum replaces Dyson’s existing cordless options? No. But Dyson has other new vacuums planned that could do that. This vacuum has a specific design for a specific use: smaller homes with entirely hard floors. There’s an accessibility opportunity here, too. This lightweight vacuum can be much easier to use for folks with mobility and strength restrictions. The magnetic charging base also makes it easy to store and access for a variety of people, whether they struggle with fine motor skills or can’t bend over and grab the vacuum.

#Dysons #PencilVachousehold,shopping,smart home,home,review,cleaning,vacuums,dyson">Why Do I Like Dyson’s PencilVac So Much?The vacuum connects to Dyson’s app, where you’ll find resources such as how to empty the dustbin and wash the filter, but not much else. It can tell you how long your last vacuuming session was, but no other details, so it’s not as interesting or as informative as the data you’d get from a robot vacuum.Fluffy FacePhotograph: Nena FarrellPhotograph: Nena FarrellThis vacuum’s full name is the Dyson PencilVac Fluffycones, aptly named for the four fluffy cones inside the vacuum head. Dyson’s previous recent stick vacuums all have the Fluffy Optic cleaner head for vacuuming hard floors. While both have a fluffy roller bar, the Fluffycones have a conical shape that Dyson says will detangle and remove hair rather than the hair getting stuck all around it. It did detangle hair for me, but when I vacuumed up larger portions of hair from my bathroom floor (a place where many a stray hair comes to die at the hands of my hairbrush, comb, and towel), it actually bunched up the hair into a ball and spat it back out a few times before finally sucking it up into the dustbin.Video: Nena FarrellWhile the hair results weren’t great, I did love this vacuum for sucking up the cat litter that constantly plagues my home. It did a great job with flour on my hard floors and a solid job with dry oats, but it occasionally just bumped the oats around instead of immediately sucking them up. I was even able to quickly run it over the top of my carpet, but rolling back and forth on the carpet a bunch did stop the cones.The head is designed to move in just about any direction. The cones make it easy to swivel around, and the green illuminating lights on the front and back help you spot any debris you might otherwise miss. With its compact size that fits in tricky corners, the PencilVac finally lets me vacuum up all the litter around the base of my toilet and pedestal sink. It’s part of what makes me reach for this vacuum over and over, even after my robot vacuum cleaned the day before.Forward MomentumPhotograph: Nena FarrellDo I think this vacuum replaces Dyson’s existing cordless options? No. But Dyson has other new vacuums planned that could do that. This vacuum has a specific design for a specific use: smaller homes with entirely hard floors. There’s an accessibility opportunity here, too. This lightweight vacuum can be much easier to use for folks with mobility and strength restrictions. The magnetic charging base also makes it easy to store and access for a variety of people, whether they struggle with fine motor skills or can’t bend over and grab the vacuum.#Dysons #PencilVachousehold,shopping,smart home,home,review,cleaning,vacuums,dyson

.

Fluffy Face

Image may contain Indoors Interior Design Gun and Weapon

Photograph: Nena Farrell

Image may contain Indoors Interior Design Racket Sport Tennis and Tennis Racket

Photograph: Nena Farrell

This vacuum’s full name is the Dyson PencilVac Fluffycones, aptly named for the four fluffy cones inside the vacuum head. Dyson’s previous recent stick vacuums all have the Fluffy Optic cleaner head for vacuuming hard floors. While both have a fluffy roller bar, the Fluffycones have a conical shape that Dyson says will detangle and remove hair rather than the hair getting stuck all around it. It did detangle hair for me, but when I vacuumed up larger portions of hair from my bathroom floor (a place where many a stray hair comes to die at the hands of my hairbrush, comb, and towel), it actually bunched up the hair into a ball and spat it back out a few times before finally sucking it up into the dustbin.

Video: Nena Farrell

While the hair results weren’t great, I did love this vacuum for sucking up the cat litter that constantly plagues my home. It did a great job with flour on my hard floors and a solid job with dry oats, but it occasionally just bumped the oats around instead of immediately sucking them up. I was even able to quickly run it over the top of my carpet, but rolling back and forth on the carpet a bunch did stop the cones.

The head is designed to move in just about any direction. The cones make it easy to swivel around, and the green illuminating lights on the front and back help you spot any debris you might otherwise miss. With its compact size that fits in tricky corners, the PencilVac finally lets me vacuum up all the litter around the base of my toilet and pedestal sink. It’s part of what makes me reach for this vacuum over and over, even after my robot vacuum cleaned the day before.

Forward Momentum

Image may contain Baseball Baseball Bat Sport Baton Stick Racket Tennis and Tennis Racket

Photograph: Nena Farrell

Do I think this vacuum replaces Dyson’s existing cordless options? No. But Dyson has other new vacuums planned that could do that. This vacuum has a specific design for a specific use: smaller homes with entirely hard floors. There’s an accessibility opportunity here, too. This lightweight vacuum can be much easier to use for folks with mobility and strength restrictions. The magnetic charging base also makes it easy to store and access for a variety of people, whether they struggle with fine motor skills or can’t bend over and grab the vacuum.

#Dysons #PencilVachousehold,shopping,smart home,home,review,cleaning,vacuums,dyson">Why Do I Like Dyson’s PencilVac So Much?

The vacuum connects to Dyson’s app, where you’ll find resources such as how to empty the dustbin and wash the filter, but not much else. It can tell you how long your last vacuuming session was, but no other details, so it’s not as interesting or as informative as the data you’d get from a robot vacuum.

Fluffy Face

Image may contain Indoors Interior Design Gun and Weapon

Photograph: Nena Farrell

Image may contain Indoors Interior Design Racket Sport Tennis and Tennis Racket

Photograph: Nena Farrell

This vacuum’s full name is the Dyson PencilVac Fluffycones, aptly named for the four fluffy cones inside the vacuum head. Dyson’s previous recent stick vacuums all have the Fluffy Optic cleaner head for vacuuming hard floors. While both have a fluffy roller bar, the Fluffycones have a conical shape that Dyson says will detangle and remove hair rather than the hair getting stuck all around it. It did detangle hair for me, but when I vacuumed up larger portions of hair from my bathroom floor (a place where many a stray hair comes to die at the hands of my hairbrush, comb, and towel), it actually bunched up the hair into a ball and spat it back out a few times before finally sucking it up into the dustbin.

Video: Nena Farrell

While the hair results weren’t great, I did love this vacuum for sucking up the cat litter that constantly plagues my home. It did a great job with flour on my hard floors and a solid job with dry oats, but it occasionally just bumped the oats around instead of immediately sucking them up. I was even able to quickly run it over the top of my carpet, but rolling back and forth on the carpet a bunch did stop the cones.

The head is designed to move in just about any direction. The cones make it easy to swivel around, and the green illuminating lights on the front and back help you spot any debris you might otherwise miss. With its compact size that fits in tricky corners, the PencilVac finally lets me vacuum up all the litter around the base of my toilet and pedestal sink. It’s part of what makes me reach for this vacuum over and over, even after my robot vacuum cleaned the day before.

Forward Momentum

Image may contain Baseball Baseball Bat Sport Baton Stick Racket Tennis and Tennis Racket

Photograph: Nena Farrell

Do I think this vacuum replaces Dyson’s existing cordless options? No. But Dyson has other new vacuums planned that could do that. This vacuum has a specific design for a specific use: smaller homes with entirely hard floors. There’s an accessibility opportunity here, too. This lightweight vacuum can be much easier to use for folks with mobility and strength restrictions. The magnetic charging base also makes it easy to store and access for a variety of people, whether they struggle with fine motor skills or can’t bend over and grab the vacuum.

#Dysons #PencilVachousehold,shopping,smart home,home,review,cleaning,vacuums,dyson

Post Comment