×
How Shivon Zilis Operated as Elon Musk’s OpenAI InsiderAs the first week of trial in Musk v. Altman comes to a close, one person has emerged as a critical behind-the-scenes manager of communications and egos in OpenAI’s early years: Shivon Zilis.A longtime employee of Musk and the mother to four of his children, Zilis joined OpenAI as an adviser in 2016. She later served as a director of its nonprofit board from 2020 until 2023 and has worked as an executive at Musk’s other companies, Neuralink and Tesla.When asked about the nature of his relationship with Zilis in court, Musk offered several answers. At one point, he called her a “chief of staff.” Later, a “close adviser.” At another point, he said “we live together, and she’s the mother of four of my children,” though Zilis said in a deposition that Musk is more of a regular guest and maintains his own residence. Last September, Zilis told OpenAI’s attorneys that she became romantic with Musk around 2016 after she had become an informal adviser to OpenAI. They had their first two children in 2021, she said.But OpenAI’s lawyers have made the case in witness testimonies and evidence that her most important role, as it pertains to this lawsuit, is being a covert liaison between OpenAI and Musk, even years after he left the nonprofit’s board in February 2018.“Do you prefer I stay close and friendly to OpenAI to keep info flowing or begin to disassociate? Trust game is about to get tricky so any guidance for how to do right by you is appreciated,” Zilis wrote in a text message to Musk on February 16, 2018, days before OpenAI announced he was leaving the board. Musk responded, “Close and friendly, but we are going to actively try to move three or four people from OpenAI to Tesla. More than that will join over time, but we won’t actively recruit them.”When asked about this exchange on the witness stand, Musk said he “wanted to know what’s going on.”In the same text thread, Musk wrote, “There is little chance of OpenAI being a serious force if I focus on Tesla AI.” Zilis reaffirmed him, saying: “There is very low probability of a good future if someone doesn’t slow Demis down,” referring to Demis Hassabis, the leader of Google DeepMind, who Musk has said he didn’t trust to control a superintelligent AI system. “You don’t realize how much you have an ability to influence him directly or otherwise slow him down. I think you know I’m not a malicious person, but in this case it feels fundamentally irresponsible to not find a way to slow or alter his path.”Roughly two months later, in an email from April 23, 2018, Zilis updated Musk on OpenAI’s fundraising efforts and progress on a project to develop an AI that could play video games. In the same message, she said she had reallocated most of her time away from OpenAI to his other companies, Neuralink and Tesla, but told him, “If you’d prefer I pull more hours back to OpenAI oversight please let me know.”Almost a year earlier, in the summer of 2017, OpenAI’s cofounders had started negotiating changes to the organization’s corporate structure—Musk wanted control of the company to start out. In an email from August 28, 2017, Zilis wrote to Musk that she had met with OpenAI president Greg Brockman and cofounder Ilya Sutskever to discuss how equity would be divided up in the new company. She summarized points from the meeting, including that Brockman and Sutskever thought one person shouldn’t have unilateral power over AGI, should they develop it. Musk wrote back to Zilis, “This is very annoying. Please encourage them to go start a company. I’ve had enough.”#Shivon #Zilis #Operated #Elon #Musks #OpenAI #Insidermodel behavior,artificial intelligence,openai,elon musk,sam altman,neuralink,musk v. altman trial

How Shivon Zilis Operated as Elon Musk’s OpenAI Insider

As the first week of trial in Musk v. Altman comes to a close, one person has emerged as a critical behind-the-scenes manager of communications and egos in OpenAI’s early years: Shivon Zilis.

A longtime employee of Musk and the mother to four of his children, Zilis joined OpenAI as an adviser in 2016. She later served as a director of its nonprofit board from 2020 until 2023 and has worked as an executive at Musk’s other companies, Neuralink and Tesla.

When asked about the nature of his relationship with Zilis in court, Musk offered several answers. At one point, he called her a “chief of staff.” Later, a “close adviser.” At another point, he said “we live together, and she’s the mother of four of my children,” though Zilis said in a deposition that Musk is more of a regular guest and maintains his own residence. Last September, Zilis told OpenAI’s attorneys that she became romantic with Musk around 2016 after she had become an informal adviser to OpenAI. They had their first two children in 2021, she said.

But OpenAI’s lawyers have made the case in witness testimonies and evidence that her most important role, as it pertains to this lawsuit, is being a covert liaison between OpenAI and Musk, even years after he left the nonprofit’s board in February 2018.

“Do you prefer I stay close and friendly to OpenAI to keep info flowing or begin to disassociate? Trust game is about to get tricky so any guidance for how to do right by you is appreciated,” Zilis wrote in a text message to Musk on February 16, 2018, days before OpenAI announced he was leaving the board. Musk responded, “Close and friendly, but we are going to actively try to move three or four people from OpenAI to Tesla. More than that will join over time, but we won’t actively recruit them.”

When asked about this exchange on the witness stand, Musk said he “wanted to know what’s going on.”

In the same text thread, Musk wrote, “There is little chance of OpenAI being a serious force if I focus on Tesla AI.” Zilis reaffirmed him, saying: “There is very low probability of a good future if someone doesn’t slow Demis down,” referring to Demis Hassabis, the leader of Google DeepMind, who Musk has said he didn’t trust to control a superintelligent AI system. “You don’t realize how much you have an ability to influence him directly or otherwise slow him down. I think you know I’m not a malicious person, but in this case it feels fundamentally irresponsible to not find a way to slow or alter his path.”

Roughly two months later, in an email from April 23, 2018, Zilis updated Musk on OpenAI’s fundraising efforts and progress on a project to develop an AI that could play video games. In the same message, she said she had reallocated most of her time away from OpenAI to his other companies, Neuralink and Tesla, but told him, “If you’d prefer I pull more hours back to OpenAI oversight please let me know.”

Almost a year earlier, in the summer of 2017, OpenAI’s cofounders had started negotiating changes to the organization’s corporate structure—Musk wanted control of the company to start out. In an email from August 28, 2017, Zilis wrote to Musk that she had met with OpenAI president Greg Brockman and cofounder Ilya Sutskever to discuss how equity would be divided up in the new company. She summarized points from the meeting, including that Brockman and Sutskever thought one person shouldn’t have unilateral power over AGI, should they develop it. Musk wrote back to Zilis, “This is very annoying. Please encourage them to go start a company. I’ve had enough.”

#Shivon #Zilis #Operated #Elon #Musks #OpenAI #Insidermodel behavior,artificial intelligence,openai,elon musk,sam altman,neuralink,musk v. altman trial

Tech-news , , , , , ,

As the first week of trial in Musk v. Altman comes to a close, one person has emerged as a critical behind-the-scenes manager of communications and egos in OpenAI’s early years: Shivon Zilis.

A longtime employee of Musk and the mother to four of his children, Zilis joined OpenAI as an adviser in 2016. She later served as a director of its nonprofit board from 2020 until 2023 and has worked as an executive at Musk’s other companies, Neuralink and Tesla.

When asked about the nature of his relationship with Zilis in court, Musk offered several answers. At one point, he called her a “chief of staff.” Later, a “close adviser.” At another point, he said “we live together, and she’s the mother of four of my children,” though Zilis said in a deposition that Musk is more of a regular guest and maintains his own residence. Last September, Zilis told OpenAI’s attorneys that she became romantic with Musk around 2016 after she had become an informal adviser to OpenAI. They had their first two children in 2021, she said.

But OpenAI’s lawyers have made the case in witness testimonies and evidence that her most important role, as it pertains to this lawsuit, is being a covert liaison between OpenAI and Musk, even years after he left the nonprofit’s board in February 2018.

“Do you prefer I stay close and friendly to OpenAI to keep info flowing or begin to disassociate? Trust game is about to get tricky so any guidance for how to do right by you is appreciated,” Zilis wrote in a text message to Musk on February 16, 2018, days before OpenAI announced he was leaving the board. Musk responded, “Close and friendly, but we are going to actively try to move three or four people from OpenAI to Tesla. More than that will join over time, but we won’t actively recruit them.”

When asked about this exchange on the witness stand, Musk said he “wanted to know what’s going on.”

In the same text thread, Musk wrote, “There is little chance of OpenAI being a serious force if I focus on Tesla AI.” Zilis reaffirmed him, saying: “There is very low probability of a good future if someone doesn’t slow Demis down,” referring to Demis Hassabis, the leader of Google DeepMind, who Musk has said he didn’t trust to control a superintelligent AI system. “You don’t realize how much you have an ability to influence him directly or otherwise slow him down. I think you know I’m not a malicious person, but in this case it feels fundamentally irresponsible to not find a way to slow or alter his path.”

Roughly two months later, in an email from April 23, 2018, Zilis updated Musk on OpenAI’s fundraising efforts and progress on a project to develop an AI that could play video games. In the same message, she said she had reallocated most of her time away from OpenAI to his other companies, Neuralink and Tesla, but told him, “If you’d prefer I pull more hours back to OpenAI oversight please let me know.”

Almost a year earlier, in the summer of 2017, OpenAI’s cofounders had started negotiating changes to the organization’s corporate structure—Musk wanted control of the company to start out. In an email from August 28, 2017, Zilis wrote to Musk that she had met with OpenAI president Greg Brockman and cofounder Ilya Sutskever to discuss how equity would be divided up in the new company. She summarized points from the meeting, including that Brockman and Sutskever thought one person shouldn’t have unilateral power over AGI, should they develop it. Musk wrote back to Zilis, “This is very annoying. Please encourage them to go start a company. I’ve had enough.”

Source link
#Shivon #Zilis #Operated #Elon #Musks #OpenAI #Insider

Tag
Previous post

Google News

Next post

Verstappen taking his time on F1 future <div id="content-body-70927473" itemprop="articleBody"><p>Max Verstappen said he was ​taking his time in deciding his Formula One future and called recent ‌rule changes merely a ‘tickle’ rather than what was really ​required.</p><p>Red Bull’s four-time world champion is no fan of ⁠the sport’s new engine era and has suggested he is unhappy enough to walk away.</p><p>The uncertainty around him has increased after McLaren announced the ‌Dutchman’s race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase would be joining them by 2028 at the latest.</p><p>“I still have time and I’m ‌taking my time,” Verstappen, 28, told reporters on Thursday ‌ahead ⁠of the Miami Grand Prix weekend. “What I said in ⁠Japan is still the same, but I also still have a lot of time.”</p><p><b>ALSO READ | <a href="https://sportstar.thehindu.com/motorsport/f1/f1-drivers-welcome-engine-rule-changes-say-more-change-needed-reactions-miami-gp/article70927457.ece" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Formula One drivers, including Verstappen, react to rule changes</a></b></p><p>Verstappen said Lambiase’s move had no bearing on his future and there were no ​hard feelings.</p><p>He once said he ‌would stop racing if Lambiase was no longer his race engineer, the voice in his ear over the team radio during the race, but he distanced himself from that stance on ‌Thursday and made clear he would have to find someone ​else.</p><p>“Otherwise I don’t get to drive,” Verstappen said grinning. “I think also, you know, times change. I would ⁠be an idiot to try and keep him. It’s not only about me all the time.</p><p>“The future, that’s what we are looking at ‌now. You know, with a different race engineer. I’m sure we’ll find solutions for that as well.”</p><p class="publish-time" id="end-of-article">Published on May 01, 2026</p></div> #Verstappen #time #future

Related Posts

Creality Falcon T1 plans to solve. It’s a 5-in-1 laser workstation that lets you swap between five different laser modules in a single desktop machine.

How Does This Work?

Creality Falcon T1 Combines Five Laser Engravers Into One Machine Laser engraving can be incredibly versatile. You can engrave designs on metal or wood and gift them to your loved ones or sell them as a business. But there has always been a catch. If you want to work with different materials like metal, wood, glass, acrylic, or crystal, you’ll often need multiple machines, each designed for a specific job. This can quickly multiply the costs and make engraving an expensive hobby. Well, that’s exactly the problem the Creality Falcon T1 plans to solve. It’s a 5-in-1 laser workstation that lets you swap between five different laser modules in a single desktop machine. How Does This Work? The main selling point of the Falcon T1 is its modular design. Instead of buying separate machines for different materials, users can swap between five laser modules in about 15 seconds without tools. Each module is designed for a specific type of work. The 20W Fiber Laser is intended for deep engraving on materials like stainless steel, aluminum, and hardwood. If you’re working primarily with metals and need things like color marking or deeper engravings, the 60W MOPA Laser is designed for materials such as titanium, gold, silver, brass, and copper. For more traditional maker projects, the 20W and 40W Diode Lasers can cut and engrave wood, acrylic, MDF, leather, ceramics, and bamboo. Meanwhile, the 5W UV Laser focuses on transparent materials such as glass, crystal, and acrylic, opening up possibilities that standard diode lasers typically struggle with. In practical terms, this means you could engrave a custom design on a metal nameplate and switch modules, then cut a wooden display stand for it with the same machine. According to Creality, building a similar setup using dedicated machines could easily cost over ,000, whereas the Falcon T1 starts at ,249. Finally, to help you not blow your eyes out, the T1 has Class 1 laser safety certification and a fully enclosed design. Additional safeguards include automatic shutdown when the lid is opened, flame detection systems, airflow monitoring, an emergency stop button, and a laser key lock. #Creality #Falcon #Combines #Laser #Engravers #Machinelaser

The main selling point of the Falcon T1 is its modular design. Instead of buying separate machines for different materials, users can swap between five laser modules in about 15 seconds without tools.

Each module is designed for a specific type of work. The 20W Fiber Laser is intended for deep engraving on materials like stainless steel, aluminum, and hardwood. If you’re working primarily with metals and need things like color marking or deeper engravings, the 60W MOPA Laser is designed for materials such as titanium, gold, silver, brass, and copper.

For more traditional maker projects, the 20W and 40W Diode Lasers can cut and engrave wood, acrylic, MDF, leather, ceramics, and bamboo. Meanwhile, the 5W UV Laser focuses on transparent materials such as glass, crystal, and acrylic, opening up possibilities that standard diode lasers typically struggle with.

In practical terms, this means you could engrave a custom design on a metal nameplate and switch modules, then cut a wooden display stand for it with the same machine. According to Creality, building a similar setup using dedicated machines could easily cost over $20,000, whereas the Falcon T1 starts at $2,249.

Finally, to help you not blow your eyes out, the T1 has Class 1 laser safety certification and a fully enclosed design. Additional safeguards include automatic shutdown when the lid is opened, flame detection systems, airflow monitoring, an emergency stop button, and a laser key lock.

#Creality #Falcon #Combines #Laser #Engravers #Machinelaser">Creality Falcon T1 Combines Five Laser Engravers Into One Machine Laser engraving can be incredibly versatile. You can engrave designs on metal or wood and gift them to your loved ones or sell them as a business. But there has always been a catch. If you want to work with different materials like metal, wood, glass, acrylic, or crystal, you’ll often need multiple machines, each designed for a specific job. This can quickly multiply the costs and make engraving an expensive hobby. Well, that’s exactly the problem the Creality Falcon T1 plans to solve. It’s a 5-in-1 laser workstation that lets you swap between five different laser modules in a single desktop machine. How Does This Work? The main selling point of the Falcon T1 is its modular design. Instead of buying separate machines for different materials, users can swap between five laser modules in about 15 seconds without tools. Each module is designed for a specific type of work. The 20W Fiber Laser is intended for deep engraving on materials like stainless steel, aluminum, and hardwood. If you’re working primarily with metals and need things like color marking or deeper engravings, the 60W MOPA Laser is designed for materials such as titanium, gold, silver, brass, and copper. For more traditional maker projects, the 20W and 40W Diode Lasers can cut and engrave wood, acrylic, MDF, leather, ceramics, and bamboo. Meanwhile, the 5W UV Laser focuses on transparent materials such as glass, crystal, and acrylic, opening up possibilities that standard diode lasers typically struggle with. In practical terms, this means you could engrave a custom design on a metal nameplate and switch modules, then cut a wooden display stand for it with the same machine. According to Creality, building a similar setup using dedicated machines could easily cost over ,000, whereas the Falcon T1 starts at ,249. Finally, to help you not blow your eyes out, the T1 has Class 1 laser safety certification and a fully enclosed design. Additional safeguards include automatic shutdown when the lid is opened, flame detection systems, airflow monitoring, an emergency stop button, and a laser key lock. #Creality #Falcon #Combines #Laser #Engravers #Machinelaser

plans to solve. It’s a 5-in-1 laser workstation that lets you swap between five different laser modules in a single desktop machine.

How Does This Work?

Creality Falcon T1 Combines Five Laser Engravers Into One Machine Laser engraving can be incredibly versatile. You can engrave designs on metal or wood and gift them to your loved ones or sell them as a business. But there has always been a catch. If you want to work with different materials like metal, wood, glass, acrylic, or crystal, you’ll often need multiple machines, each designed for a specific job. This can quickly multiply the costs and make engraving an expensive hobby. Well, that’s exactly the problem the Creality Falcon T1 plans to solve. It’s a 5-in-1 laser workstation that lets you swap between five different laser modules in a single desktop machine. How Does This Work? The main selling point of the Falcon T1 is its modular design. Instead of buying separate machines for different materials, users can swap between five laser modules in about 15 seconds without tools. Each module is designed for a specific type of work. The 20W Fiber Laser is intended for deep engraving on materials like stainless steel, aluminum, and hardwood. If you’re working primarily with metals and need things like color marking or deeper engravings, the 60W MOPA Laser is designed for materials such as titanium, gold, silver, brass, and copper. For more traditional maker projects, the 20W and 40W Diode Lasers can cut and engrave wood, acrylic, MDF, leather, ceramics, and bamboo. Meanwhile, the 5W UV Laser focuses on transparent materials such as glass, crystal, and acrylic, opening up possibilities that standard diode lasers typically struggle with. In practical terms, this means you could engrave a custom design on a metal nameplate and switch modules, then cut a wooden display stand for it with the same machine. According to Creality, building a similar setup using dedicated machines could easily cost over ,000, whereas the Falcon T1 starts at ,249. Finally, to help you not blow your eyes out, the T1 has Class 1 laser safety certification and a fully enclosed design. Additional safeguards include automatic shutdown when the lid is opened, flame detection systems, airflow monitoring, an emergency stop button, and a laser key lock. #Creality #Falcon #Combines #Laser #Engravers #Machinelaser

The main selling point of the Falcon T1 is its modular design. Instead of buying separate machines for different materials, users can swap between five laser modules in about 15 seconds without tools.

Each module is designed for a specific type of work. The 20W Fiber Laser is intended for deep engraving on materials like stainless steel, aluminum, and hardwood. If you’re working primarily with metals and need things like color marking or deeper engravings, the 60W MOPA Laser is designed for materials such as titanium, gold, silver, brass, and copper.

For more traditional maker projects, the 20W and 40W Diode Lasers can cut and engrave wood, acrylic, MDF, leather, ceramics, and bamboo. Meanwhile, the 5W UV Laser focuses on transparent materials such as glass, crystal, and acrylic, opening up possibilities that standard diode lasers typically struggle with.

In practical terms, this means you could engrave a custom design on a metal nameplate and switch modules, then cut a wooden display stand for it with the same machine. According to Creality, building a similar setup using dedicated machines could easily cost over $20,000, whereas the Falcon T1 starts at $2,249.

Finally, to help you not blow your eyes out, the T1 has Class 1 laser safety certification and a fully enclosed design. Additional safeguards include automatic shutdown when the lid is opened, flame detection systems, airflow monitoring, an emergency stop button, and a laser key lock.

#Creality #Falcon #Combines #Laser #Engravers #Machinelaser">Creality Falcon T1 Combines Five Laser Engravers Into One Machine

Laser engraving can be incredibly versatile. You can engrave designs on metal or wood and gift them to your loved ones or sell them as a business. But there has always been a catch. If you want to work with different materials like metal, wood, glass, acrylic, or crystal, you’ll often need multiple machines, each designed for a specific job. This can quickly multiply the costs and make engraving an expensive hobby. Well, that’s exactly the problem the Creality Falcon T1 plans to solve. It’s a 5-in-1 laser workstation that lets you swap between five different laser modules in a single desktop machine.

How Does This Work?

Creality Falcon T1 Combines Five Laser Engravers Into One Machine Laser engraving can be incredibly versatile. You can engrave designs on metal or wood and gift them to your loved ones or sell them as a business. But there has always been a catch. If you want to work with different materials like metal, wood, glass, acrylic, or crystal, you’ll often need multiple machines, each designed for a specific job. This can quickly multiply the costs and make engraving an expensive hobby. Well, that’s exactly the problem the Creality Falcon T1 plans to solve. It’s a 5-in-1 laser workstation that lets you swap between five different laser modules in a single desktop machine. How Does This Work? The main selling point of the Falcon T1 is its modular design. Instead of buying separate machines for different materials, users can swap between five laser modules in about 15 seconds without tools. Each module is designed for a specific type of work. The 20W Fiber Laser is intended for deep engraving on materials like stainless steel, aluminum, and hardwood. If you’re working primarily with metals and need things like color marking or deeper engravings, the 60W MOPA Laser is designed for materials such as titanium, gold, silver, brass, and copper. For more traditional maker projects, the 20W and 40W Diode Lasers can cut and engrave wood, acrylic, MDF, leather, ceramics, and bamboo. Meanwhile, the 5W UV Laser focuses on transparent materials such as glass, crystal, and acrylic, opening up possibilities that standard diode lasers typically struggle with. In practical terms, this means you could engrave a custom design on a metal nameplate and switch modules, then cut a wooden display stand for it with the same machine. According to Creality, building a similar setup using dedicated machines could easily cost over ,000, whereas the Falcon T1 starts at ,249. Finally, to help you not blow your eyes out, the T1 has Class 1 laser safety certification and a fully enclosed design. Additional safeguards include automatic shutdown when the lid is opened, flame detection systems, airflow monitoring, an emergency stop button, and a laser key lock. #Creality #Falcon #Combines #Laser #Engravers #Machinelaser

The main selling point of the Falcon T1 is its modular design. Instead of buying separate machines for different materials, users can swap between five laser modules in about 15 seconds without tools.

Each module is designed for a specific type of work. The 20W Fiber Laser is intended for deep engraving on materials like stainless steel, aluminum, and hardwood. If you’re working primarily with metals and need things like color marking or deeper engravings, the 60W MOPA Laser is designed for materials such as titanium, gold, silver, brass, and copper.

For more traditional maker projects, the 20W and 40W Diode Lasers can cut and engrave wood, acrylic, MDF, leather, ceramics, and bamboo. Meanwhile, the 5W UV Laser focuses on transparent materials such as glass, crystal, and acrylic, opening up possibilities that standard diode lasers typically struggle with.

In practical terms, this means you could engrave a custom design on a metal nameplate and switch modules, then cut a wooden display stand for it with the same machine. According to Creality, building a similar setup using dedicated machines could easily cost over $20,000, whereas the Falcon T1 starts at $2,249.

Finally, to help you not blow your eyes out, the T1 has Class 1 laser safety certification and a fully enclosed design. Additional safeguards include automatic shutdown when the lid is opened, flame detection systems, airflow monitoring, an emergency stop button, and a laser key lock.

#Creality #Falcon #Combines #Laser #Engravers #Machinelaser

It seems like the Murdochs couldn’t let the Ellisons have all the fun.

Fox Corporation has agreed to buy Roku in a $22 billion deal, the companies announced Monday.

The deal will bring Roku under the Fox umbrella, which already includes the Fox broadcast network, Fox Sports, Fox News, and the free ad-supported streaming service Tubi. Under the terms of the deal, Fox is buying Roku for $160 per share through a mix of cash and Fox stock.

The companies said the deal will benefit both sides by combining Fox’s content with Roku’s streaming platform, first-party data, and reach. According to a press release, Roku serves more than 100 million global streaming households, including more than half of all U.S. broadband households. The companies claim the combined company will become the third-largest player in U.S. television by share of viewing.

Lachlan Murdoch, the son of Rupert Murdoch, currently runs Fox and serves as chair of News Corp., the parent company of several major right-leaning news organizations, including The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post. He said the deal is a defining moment for Fox.

“Today, we take the next step: bringing together the most valuable live content portfolio in video consumption with the preeminent streaming platform through which America watches it,” Murdoch said in a statement. “This combination will transform the scope of our company into high-growth verticals and yield a step change in our overall growth profile.”

The deal continues the trend of media companies consolidating into massive conglomerates. Paramount, the parent company of CBS, Paramount Pictures, MTV, and Nickelodeon, was acquired by Skydance Media in 2025 in a deal backed in part by Trump ally and Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison. His son, David Ellison, became CEO of the combined company, now called Paramount Skydance. Just last week, Paramount Skydance received a green light from the U.S. Justice Department to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, though that deal still needs other regulatory approvals.

The Roku deal also comes as streaming continues to take over traditional broadcast and cable TV. Nielsen reported that in March, streaming accounted for roughly 48% of TV viewing in the U.S., compared with about 20% for broadcast TV and 21% for cable. Within streaming, YouTube accounted for the largest share of TV viewing that month at 13%, followed by Netflix. at 8%. The Roku Channel accounted for 3% of TV viewing that month.

The acquisition of Roku is the Murdochs’ biggest streaming move yet. Fox has been one of the slowest traditional U.S. broadcast networks to fully jump into streaming. The company bought Tubi in 2020 for $440 million, but it didn’t launch its own paid streaming platform, Fox One, until 2025.

For comparison, NBC launched Peacock in 2020, while CBS launched CBS All Access, which later became Paramount+, back in 2014.

Tangentially, the liberal Murdoch son, James Murdoch, bought half of Vox Media last month.

#Murdoch #Familys #Fox #RokuFox,Roku,Streaming">The Murdoch Family’s Fox Is Taking Over Roku It seems like the Murdochs couldn’t let the Ellisons have all the fun. Fox Corporation has agreed to buy Roku in a billion deal, the companies announced Monday. The deal will bring Roku under the Fox umbrella, which already includes the Fox broadcast network, Fox Sports, Fox News, and the free ad-supported streaming service Tubi. Under the terms of the deal, Fox is buying Roku for 0 per share through a mix of cash and Fox stock. The companies said the deal will benefit both sides by combining Fox’s content with Roku’s streaming platform, first-party data, and reach. According to a press release, Roku serves more than 100 million global streaming households, including more than half of all U.S. broadband households. The companies claim the combined company will become the third-largest player in U.S. television by share of viewing. Lachlan Murdoch, the son of Rupert Murdoch, currently runs Fox and serves as chair of News Corp., the parent company of several major right-leaning news organizations, including The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post. He said the deal is a defining moment for Fox. “Today, we take the next step: bringing together the most valuable live content portfolio in video consumption with the preeminent streaming platform through which America watches it,” Murdoch said in a statement. “This combination will transform the scope of our company into high-growth verticals and yield a step change in our overall growth profile.” The deal continues the trend of media companies consolidating into massive conglomerates. Paramount, the parent company of CBS, Paramount Pictures, MTV, and Nickelodeon, was acquired by Skydance Media in 2025 in a deal backed in part by Trump ally and Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison. His son, David Ellison, became CEO of the combined company, now called Paramount Skydance. Just last week, Paramount Skydance received a green light from the U.S. Justice Department to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, though that deal still needs other regulatory approvals. The Roku deal also comes as streaming continues to take over traditional broadcast and cable TV. Nielsen reported that in March, streaming accounted for roughly 48% of TV viewing in the U.S., compared with about 20% for broadcast TV and 21% for cable. Within streaming, YouTube accounted for the largest share of TV viewing that month at 13%, followed by Netflix. at 8%. The Roku Channel accounted for 3% of TV viewing that month. The acquisition of Roku is the Murdochs’ biggest streaming move yet. Fox has been one of the slowest traditional U.S. broadcast networks to fully jump into streaming. The company bought Tubi in 2020 for 0 million, but it didn’t launch its own paid streaming platform, Fox One, until 2025. For comparison, NBC launched Peacock in 2020, while CBS launched CBS All Access, which later became Paramount+, back in 2014. Tangentially, the liberal Murdoch son, James Murdoch, bought half of Vox Media last month. #Murdoch #Familys #Fox #RokuFox,Roku,Streaming

press release, Roku serves more than 100 million global streaming households, including more than half of all U.S. broadband households. The companies claim the combined company will become the third-largest player in U.S. television by share of viewing.

Lachlan Murdoch, the son of Rupert Murdoch, currently runs Fox and serves as chair of News Corp., the parent company of several major right-leaning news organizations, including The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post. He said the deal is a defining moment for Fox.

“Today, we take the next step: bringing together the most valuable live content portfolio in video consumption with the preeminent streaming platform through which America watches it,” Murdoch said in a statement. “This combination will transform the scope of our company into high-growth verticals and yield a step change in our overall growth profile.”

The deal continues the trend of media companies consolidating into massive conglomerates. Paramount, the parent company of CBS, Paramount Pictures, MTV, and Nickelodeon, was acquired by Skydance Media in 2025 in a deal backed in part by Trump ally and Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison. His son, David Ellison, became CEO of the combined company, now called Paramount Skydance. Just last week, Paramount Skydance received a green light from the U.S. Justice Department to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, though that deal still needs other regulatory approvals.

The Roku deal also comes as streaming continues to take over traditional broadcast and cable TV. Nielsen reported that in March, streaming accounted for roughly 48% of TV viewing in the U.S., compared with about 20% for broadcast TV and 21% for cable. Within streaming, YouTube accounted for the largest share of TV viewing that month at 13%, followed by Netflix. at 8%. The Roku Channel accounted for 3% of TV viewing that month.

The acquisition of Roku is the Murdochs’ biggest streaming move yet. Fox has been one of the slowest traditional U.S. broadcast networks to fully jump into streaming. The company bought Tubi in 2020 for $440 million, but it didn’t launch its own paid streaming platform, Fox One, until 2025.

For comparison, NBC launched Peacock in 2020, while CBS launched CBS All Access, which later became Paramount+, back in 2014.

Tangentially, the liberal Murdoch son, James Murdoch, bought half of Vox Media last month.

#Murdoch #Familys #Fox #RokuFox,Roku,Streaming">The Murdoch Family’s Fox Is Taking Over RokuThe Murdoch Family’s Fox Is Taking Over Roku It seems like the Murdochs couldn’t let the Ellisons have all the fun. Fox Corporation has agreed to buy Roku in a $22 billion deal, the companies announced Monday. The deal will bring Roku under the Fox umbrella, which already includes the Fox broadcast network, Fox Sports, Fox News, and the free ad-supported streaming service Tubi. Under the terms of the deal, Fox is buying Roku for $160 per share through a mix of cash and Fox stock. The companies said the deal will benefit both sides by combining Fox’s content with Roku’s streaming platform, first-party data, and reach. According to a press release, Roku serves more than 100 million global streaming households, including more than half of all U.S. broadband households. The companies claim the combined company will become the third-largest player in U.S. television by share of viewing. Lachlan Murdoch, the son of Rupert Murdoch, currently runs Fox and serves as chair of News Corp., the parent company of several major right-leaning news organizations, including The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post. He said the deal is a defining moment for Fox. “Today, we take the next step: bringing together the most valuable live content portfolio in video consumption with the preeminent streaming platform through which America watches it,” Murdoch said in a statement. “This combination will transform the scope of our company into high-growth verticals and yield a step change in our overall growth profile.” The deal continues the trend of media companies consolidating into massive conglomerates. Paramount, the parent company of CBS, Paramount Pictures, MTV, and Nickelodeon, was acquired by Skydance Media in 2025 in a deal backed in part by Trump ally and Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison. His son, David Ellison, became CEO of the combined company, now called Paramount Skydance. Just last week, Paramount Skydance received a green light from the U.S. Justice Department to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, though that deal still needs other regulatory approvals. The Roku deal also comes as streaming continues to take over traditional broadcast and cable TV. Nielsen reported that in March, streaming accounted for roughly 48% of TV viewing in the U.S., compared with about 20% for broadcast TV and 21% for cable. Within streaming, YouTube accounted for the largest share of TV viewing that month at 13%, followed by Netflix. at 8%. The Roku Channel accounted for 3% of TV viewing that month. The acquisition of Roku is the Murdochs’ biggest streaming move yet. Fox has been one of the slowest traditional U.S. broadcast networks to fully jump into streaming. The company bought Tubi in 2020 for $440 million, but it didn’t launch its own paid streaming platform, Fox One, until 2025. For comparison, NBC launched Peacock in 2020, while CBS launched CBS All Access, which later became Paramount+, back in 2014. Tangentially, the liberal Murdoch son, James Murdoch, bought half of Vox Media last month. #Murdoch #Familys #Fox #RokuFox,Roku,Streaming

It seems like the Murdochs couldn’t let the Ellisons have all the fun.

Fox Corporation has agreed to buy Roku in a $22 billion deal, the companies announced Monday.

The deal will bring Roku under the Fox umbrella, which already includes the Fox broadcast network, Fox Sports, Fox News, and the free ad-supported streaming service Tubi. Under the terms of the deal, Fox is buying Roku for $160 per share through a mix of cash and Fox stock.

The companies said the deal will benefit both sides by combining Fox’s content with Roku’s streaming platform, first-party data, and reach. According to a press release, Roku serves more than 100 million global streaming households, including more than half of all U.S. broadband households. The companies claim the combined company will become the third-largest player in U.S. television by share of viewing.

Lachlan Murdoch, the son of Rupert Murdoch, currently runs Fox and serves as chair of News Corp., the parent company of several major right-leaning news organizations, including The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post. He said the deal is a defining moment for Fox.

“Today, we take the next step: bringing together the most valuable live content portfolio in video consumption with the preeminent streaming platform through which America watches it,” Murdoch said in a statement. “This combination will transform the scope of our company into high-growth verticals and yield a step change in our overall growth profile.”

The deal continues the trend of media companies consolidating into massive conglomerates. Paramount, the parent company of CBS, Paramount Pictures, MTV, and Nickelodeon, was acquired by Skydance Media in 2025 in a deal backed in part by Trump ally and Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison. His son, David Ellison, became CEO of the combined company, now called Paramount Skydance. Just last week, Paramount Skydance received a green light from the U.S. Justice Department to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, though that deal still needs other regulatory approvals.

The Roku deal also comes as streaming continues to take over traditional broadcast and cable TV. Nielsen reported that in March, streaming accounted for roughly 48% of TV viewing in the U.S., compared with about 20% for broadcast TV and 21% for cable. Within streaming, YouTube accounted for the largest share of TV viewing that month at 13%, followed by Netflix. at 8%. The Roku Channel accounted for 3% of TV viewing that month.

The acquisition of Roku is the Murdochs’ biggest streaming move yet. Fox has been one of the slowest traditional U.S. broadcast networks to fully jump into streaming. The company bought Tubi in 2020 for $440 million, but it didn’t launch its own paid streaming platform, Fox One, until 2025.

For comparison, NBC launched Peacock in 2020, while CBS launched CBS All Access, which later became Paramount+, back in 2014.

Tangentially, the liberal Murdoch son, James Murdoch, bought half of Vox Media last month.

#Murdoch #Familys #Fox #RokuFox,Roku,Streaming

A decade ago, kratom advocates fought a surprisingly successful campaign against a proposed Drug Enforcement Administration ban that claimed the obscure Southeast Asian plant posed “an imminent hazard to public safety.”

They won bipartisan allies from Bernie Sanders to Rand Paul, and helped create a billion-dollar industry out of kratom, which has pain-relieving effects they said could help fight the opioid epidemic as a far safer, natural alternative to pills.

Now, many of those same pro-kratom activists are calling for a ban on products containing concentrates of one of kratom’s active components: 7-hydroxymitragynine, or 7-OH, an ultra-potent extract with opioid-like effects. And it’s causing major friction amongst consumers, sellers, and advocates of both substances.

“This is a chemically manipulated, full-blown opioid that is now in the marketplace,” claims Mac Haddow, the senior public policy fellow at the American Kratom Association, a kratom industry lobby group. “They masquerade as kratom products.”

The proliferation of 7-OH in gummies, capsules, and shots with brand names like Magic 7OH, 7 O’Heaven, and Pure OHMS across thousands of gas stations and corner stores over the past few years has caused increasing consternation. Consumers of 7-OH have spoken of its excruciating withdrawal symptoms, and there have been reports of polydrug overdoses involving 7-OH and other substances. Some are now entering rehab to overcome their dependency, while others are self-detoxing based on advice from Redditors.

The kratom community fears that 7-OH’s bad reputation could drag the entire kratom industry into a regulatory quagmire. But the 7-OH industry has organized against the potential prohibition, claiming 7-OH is kratom, despite only appearing in trace amounts within the leaves of the kratom plant, and that its benefits as an analgesic outweigh its potential harms.

Anti-7-OH directives from the federal government have exacerbated tensions between the two sides.

Last July, US Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. described the 7-OH industry as “sinister” at a press conference where FDA commissioner Marty Makary called for the DEA to categorize the drug as Schedule I—the most restrictive class of banned substances. Speaking from the Oval Office on May 11, President Donald Trump publicly endorsed “natural 7-OH,” in confusing remarks which appeared to refer to kratom. On top of all that, it appears that both RFK Jr. and Department of Homeland Security secretary Markwayne Mullin—who is also pushing for a 7-OH crackdown—have strong ties to a kratom lobbyist (and convicted criminal) behind a notorious kratom drinks company.

Proponents of 7-OH see the substance and the plant it’s derived from as inexorably linked. In April 2025 testimony to Colorado legislators debating how to regulate kratom and 7-OH, Michele Ross, the chief scientific adviser to the 7-OH advocacy group 7-HOPE Alliance, wrote, “To say 7-OH is not kratom is to say caffeine is not coffee or THC is not cannabis. It simply does not make sense.”

But as opposed to coffee, cannabis, and kratom—which have been consumed for centuries if not thousands of years—7-OH does not have a long history of human use. It’s only been on the market for a few years.

Many of the products that are labeled 7-OH contain little-understood compounds with unknown biological effects in animals or humans, says Chris McCurdy, a leading kratom researcher and director of the University of Florida’s translational drug development core. “So, these products, while represented as ‘clean’ are anything but.”

Meanwhile, a dozen states, from California to Vermont, according to reports, have already moved ahead of federal scheduling with their own 7-OH bans. Seven of those states have also banned kratom, although Rhode Island recently overturned its prohibition.

#Kratom #Civil #War #Heating #MAHA #Picked #Sidemedicine,health,politics,government,drugs,robert f. kennedy jr.">The Kratom Civil War Is Heating Up, and MAHA Has Picked a SideA decade ago, kratom advocates fought a surprisingly successful campaign against a proposed Drug Enforcement Administration ban that claimed the obscure Southeast Asian plant posed “an imminent hazard to public safety.”They won bipartisan allies from Bernie Sanders to Rand Paul, and helped create a billion-dollar industry out of kratom, which has pain-relieving effects they said could help fight the opioid epidemic as a far safer, natural alternative to pills.Now, many of those same pro-kratom activists are calling for a ban on products containing concentrates of one of kratom’s active components: 7-hydroxymitragynine, or 7-OH, an ultra-potent extract with opioid-like effects. And it’s causing major friction amongst consumers, sellers, and advocates of both substances.“This is a chemically manipulated, full-blown opioid that is now in the marketplace,” claims Mac Haddow, the senior public policy fellow at the American Kratom Association, a kratom industry lobby group. “They masquerade as kratom products.”The proliferation of 7-OH in gummies, capsules, and shots with brand names like Magic 7OH, 7 O’Heaven, and Pure OHMS across thousands of gas stations and corner stores over the past few years has caused increasing consternation. Consumers of 7-OH have spoken of its excruciating withdrawal symptoms, and there have been reports of polydrug overdoses involving 7-OH and other substances. Some are now entering rehab to overcome their dependency, while others are self-detoxing based on advice from Redditors.The kratom community fears that 7-OH’s bad reputation could drag the entire kratom industry into a regulatory quagmire. But the 7-OH industry has organized against the potential prohibition, claiming 7-OH is kratom, despite only appearing in trace amounts within the leaves of the kratom plant, and that its benefits as an analgesic outweigh its potential harms.Anti-7-OH directives from the federal government have exacerbated tensions between the two sides.Last July, US Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. described the 7-OH industry as “sinister” at a press conference where FDA commissioner Marty Makary called for the DEA to categorize the drug as Schedule I—the most restrictive class of banned substances. Speaking from the Oval Office on May 11, President Donald Trump publicly endorsed “natural 7-OH,” in confusing remarks which appeared to refer to kratom. On top of all that, it appears that both RFK Jr. and Department of Homeland Security secretary Markwayne Mullin—who is also pushing for a 7-OH crackdown—have strong ties to a kratom lobbyist (and convicted criminal) behind a notorious kratom drinks company.Proponents of 7-OH see the substance and the plant it’s derived from as inexorably linked. In April 2025 testimony to Colorado legislators debating how to regulate kratom and 7-OH, Michele Ross, the chief scientific adviser to the 7-OH advocacy group 7-HOPE Alliance, wrote, “To say 7-OH is not kratom is to say caffeine is not coffee or THC is not cannabis. It simply does not make sense.”But as opposed to coffee, cannabis, and kratom—which have been consumed for centuries if not thousands of years—7-OH does not have a long history of human use. It’s only been on the market for a few years.Many of the products that are labeled 7-OH contain little-understood compounds with unknown biological effects in animals or humans, says Chris McCurdy, a leading kratom researcher and director of the University of Florida’s translational drug development core. “So, these products, while represented as ‘clean’ are anything but.”Meanwhile, a dozen states, from California to Vermont, according to reports, have already moved ahead of federal scheduling with their own 7-OH bans. Seven of those states have also banned kratom, although Rhode Island recently overturned its prohibition.#Kratom #Civil #War #Heating #MAHA #Picked #Sidemedicine,health,politics,government,drugs,robert f. kennedy jr.

kratom advocates fought a surprisingly successful campaign against a proposed Drug Enforcement Administration ban that claimed the obscure Southeast Asian plant posed “an imminent hazard to public safety.”

They won bipartisan allies from Bernie Sanders to Rand Paul, and helped create a billion-dollar industry out of kratom, which has pain-relieving effects they said could help fight the opioid epidemic as a far safer, natural alternative to pills.

Now, many of those same pro-kratom activists are calling for a ban on products containing concentrates of one of kratom’s active components: 7-hydroxymitragynine, or 7-OH, an ultra-potent extract with opioid-like effects. And it’s causing major friction amongst consumers, sellers, and advocates of both substances.

“This is a chemically manipulated, full-blown opioid that is now in the marketplace,” claims Mac Haddow, the senior public policy fellow at the American Kratom Association, a kratom industry lobby group. “They masquerade as kratom products.”

The proliferation of 7-OH in gummies, capsules, and shots with brand names like Magic 7OH, 7 O’Heaven, and Pure OHMS across thousands of gas stations and corner stores over the past few years has caused increasing consternation. Consumers of 7-OH have spoken of its excruciating withdrawal symptoms, and there have been reports of polydrug overdoses involving 7-OH and other substances. Some are now entering rehab to overcome their dependency, while others are self-detoxing based on advice from Redditors.

The kratom community fears that 7-OH’s bad reputation could drag the entire kratom industry into a regulatory quagmire. But the 7-OH industry has organized against the potential prohibition, claiming 7-OH is kratom, despite only appearing in trace amounts within the leaves of the kratom plant, and that its benefits as an analgesic outweigh its potential harms.

Anti-7-OH directives from the federal government have exacerbated tensions between the two sides.

Last July, US Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. described the 7-OH industry as “sinister” at a press conference where FDA commissioner Marty Makary called for the DEA to categorize the drug as Schedule I—the most restrictive class of banned substances. Speaking from the Oval Office on May 11, President Donald Trump publicly endorsed “natural 7-OH,” in confusing remarks which appeared to refer to kratom. On top of all that, it appears that both RFK Jr. and Department of Homeland Security secretary Markwayne Mullin—who is also pushing for a 7-OH crackdown—have strong ties to a kratom lobbyist (and convicted criminal) behind a notorious kratom drinks company.

Proponents of 7-OH see the substance and the plant it’s derived from as inexorably linked. In April 2025 testimony to Colorado legislators debating how to regulate kratom and 7-OH, Michele Ross, the chief scientific adviser to the 7-OH advocacy group 7-HOPE Alliance, wrote, “To say 7-OH is not kratom is to say caffeine is not coffee or THC is not cannabis. It simply does not make sense.”

But as opposed to coffee, cannabis, and kratom—which have been consumed for centuries if not thousands of years—7-OH does not have a long history of human use. It’s only been on the market for a few years.

Many of the products that are labeled 7-OH contain little-understood compounds with unknown biological effects in animals or humans, says Chris McCurdy, a leading kratom researcher and director of the University of Florida’s translational drug development core. “So, these products, while represented as ‘clean’ are anything but.”

Meanwhile, a dozen states, from California to Vermont, according to reports, have already moved ahead of federal scheduling with their own 7-OH bans. Seven of those states have also banned kratom, although Rhode Island recently overturned its prohibition.

#Kratom #Civil #War #Heating #MAHA #Picked #Sidemedicine,health,politics,government,drugs,robert f. kennedy jr.">The Kratom Civil War Is Heating Up, and MAHA Has Picked a Side

A decade ago, kratom advocates fought a surprisingly successful campaign against a proposed Drug Enforcement Administration ban that claimed the obscure Southeast Asian plant posed “an imminent hazard to public safety.”

They won bipartisan allies from Bernie Sanders to Rand Paul, and helped create a billion-dollar industry out of kratom, which has pain-relieving effects they said could help fight the opioid epidemic as a far safer, natural alternative to pills.

Now, many of those same pro-kratom activists are calling for a ban on products containing concentrates of one of kratom’s active components: 7-hydroxymitragynine, or 7-OH, an ultra-potent extract with opioid-like effects. And it’s causing major friction amongst consumers, sellers, and advocates of both substances.

“This is a chemically manipulated, full-blown opioid that is now in the marketplace,” claims Mac Haddow, the senior public policy fellow at the American Kratom Association, a kratom industry lobby group. “They masquerade as kratom products.”

The proliferation of 7-OH in gummies, capsules, and shots with brand names like Magic 7OH, 7 O’Heaven, and Pure OHMS across thousands of gas stations and corner stores over the past few years has caused increasing consternation. Consumers of 7-OH have spoken of its excruciating withdrawal symptoms, and there have been reports of polydrug overdoses involving 7-OH and other substances. Some are now entering rehab to overcome their dependency, while others are self-detoxing based on advice from Redditors.

The kratom community fears that 7-OH’s bad reputation could drag the entire kratom industry into a regulatory quagmire. But the 7-OH industry has organized against the potential prohibition, claiming 7-OH is kratom, despite only appearing in trace amounts within the leaves of the kratom plant, and that its benefits as an analgesic outweigh its potential harms.

Anti-7-OH directives from the federal government have exacerbated tensions between the two sides.

Last July, US Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. described the 7-OH industry as “sinister” at a press conference where FDA commissioner Marty Makary called for the DEA to categorize the drug as Schedule I—the most restrictive class of banned substances. Speaking from the Oval Office on May 11, President Donald Trump publicly endorsed “natural 7-OH,” in confusing remarks which appeared to refer to kratom. On top of all that, it appears that both RFK Jr. and Department of Homeland Security secretary Markwayne Mullin—who is also pushing for a 7-OH crackdown—have strong ties to a kratom lobbyist (and convicted criminal) behind a notorious kratom drinks company.

Proponents of 7-OH see the substance and the plant it’s derived from as inexorably linked. In April 2025 testimony to Colorado legislators debating how to regulate kratom and 7-OH, Michele Ross, the chief scientific adviser to the 7-OH advocacy group 7-HOPE Alliance, wrote, “To say 7-OH is not kratom is to say caffeine is not coffee or THC is not cannabis. It simply does not make sense.”

But as opposed to coffee, cannabis, and kratom—which have been consumed for centuries if not thousands of years—7-OH does not have a long history of human use. It’s only been on the market for a few years.

Many of the products that are labeled 7-OH contain little-understood compounds with unknown biological effects in animals or humans, says Chris McCurdy, a leading kratom researcher and director of the University of Florida’s translational drug development core. “So, these products, while represented as ‘clean’ are anything but.”

Meanwhile, a dozen states, from California to Vermont, according to reports, have already moved ahead of federal scheduling with their own 7-OH bans. Seven of those states have also banned kratom, although Rhode Island recently overturned its prohibition.

#Kratom #Civil #War #Heating #MAHA #Picked #Sidemedicine,health,politics,government,drugs,robert f. kennedy jr.

Post Comment