×
Xreal, Google’s smartglasses partner, thinks it has finally mastered this notoriously tricky industry | TechCrunch The smart glasses industry has long been a tortured dream of Silicon Valley. The premise is appealing enough: What if, to enjoy the benefits of mobile computing, people didn’t have to stare at their phones all day long and could, instead, simply wear a lightweight computing device on their face? Science fiction fans (a demographic that is strong in the tech industry) can see this vision perfectly. However, the industry has — for much of the last decade — resembled a financial black hole into which gargantuan investments have been sunk and from which little to no profit has ever emerged. “Everybody’s losing money,” said Chi Xu, the founder and CEO of the smart glasses company Xreal, which is a longtime partner of Google. I met Xu at Google’s I/O conference in Mountain View last week, where he was promoting Xreal’s Project Aura. That’s its latest effort to create a set of functional XR glasses that people actually want to use. “That’s because it’s very hard, what we’re doing,” he said. For much of the industry’s existence, the problems of smart glasses have seemed somewhat obvious: bulky, uncomfortable, and socially awkward form factor, paired with negligibly beneficial software. Now, however, industry insiders — including Xu — feel like their business has turned a corner and may be reaching an inflection point. That supposed inflection point has something to do with Meta, whose 2023 partnership with Ray-Ban launched one of the first lines of models that has actually managed to sell a lot of units. (It’s worth noting, however, that the division responsible for the glasses, Reality Labs, still operates at a massive loss.) Now, as form factors shrink and software improves, Xu feels that Xreal can finally become a leader in the space. “You need all the key pieces ready — you need the hardware ready, the operating system needs to be ready, and then you need a great user interface,” Xu said. Xreal’s newest model Aura is wired smart glasses that have OLED displays embedded within them, meaning that you can watch high-resolution videos within the frames themselves. Somewhat awkwardly, Aura comes tethered to a “puck” — essentially a phone-shaped mini-computer that powers the experience behind the glasses. When using it, you can ostensibly just slip it into your pocket. But in exchange for the awkwardness of the puck, the user gets a wider variety of fun experiences with the glasses, including an immersive Google Maps app, VR YouTube videos, and a “painting app” that lets you — via the powers of hand tracking — create holographic imagery that only you can see. There are also reportedly games, playable (again) via hand tracking, and basic web surfing functionality. “Whether you are following a floating recipe while cooking, setting up a private workspace at a coffee shop or on a flight, or watching a movie on a virtual big screen at home, the experience is seamless,” the company promises. Xu also says that he imagines the device being used not just by the casual consumer but by professionals as well. “It’s not just about watching the NBA game in a hologram type of format, you could also go to a coffee shop and do some work,” he said. Currently, the glasses are only available for developers, but the plan is for them to launch commercially later this year. Xreal is also working on an IPO that is expected to take place before 2026 is over, although Xu declined to say much about it. In the meantime, the company is working on that whole turning-a-profit thing. Xu notes that his company has been raising its gross margin while lowering its costs for marketing and sales. “Next year is the year when we could actually break even,” he says. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Xreal #Googles #smartglasses #partner #thinks #finally #mastered #notoriously #tricky #industry #TechCrunchGoogle,Google I/O,AI,SMART Glasses,XReal

Xreal, Google’s smartglasses partner, thinks it has finally mastered this notoriously tricky industry | TechCrunch

The smart glasses industry has long been a tortured dream of Silicon Valley. The premise is appealing enough: What if, to enjoy the benefits of mobile computing, people didn’t have to stare at their phones all day long and could, instead, simply wear a lightweight computing device on their face? Science fiction fans (a demographic that is strong in the tech industry) can see this vision perfectly.

However, the industry has — for much of the last decade — resembled a financial black hole into which gargantuan investments have been sunk and from which little to no profit has ever emerged.

“Everybody’s losing money,” said Chi Xu, the founder and CEO of the smart glasses company Xreal, which is a longtime partner of Google. I met Xu at Google’s I/O conference in Mountain View last week, where he was promoting Xreal’s Project Aura. That’s its latest effort to create a set of functional XR glasses that people actually want to use.

“That’s because it’s very hard, what we’re doing,” he said.

For much of the industry’s existence, the problems of smart glasses have seemed somewhat obvious: bulky, uncomfortable, and socially awkward form factor, paired with negligibly beneficial software. Now, however, industry insiders — including Xu — feel like their business has turned a corner and may be reaching an inflection point.

That supposed inflection point has something to do with Meta, whose 2023 partnership with Ray-Ban launched one of the first lines of models that has actually managed to sell a lot of units. (It’s worth noting, however, that the division responsible for the glasses, Reality Labs, still operates at a massive loss.)

Now, as form factors shrink and software improves, Xu feels that Xreal can finally become a leader in the space. “You need all the key pieces ready — you need the hardware ready, the operating system needs to be ready, and then you need a great user interface,” Xu said.

Xreal’s newest model Aura is wired smart glasses that have OLED displays embedded within them, meaning that you can watch high-resolution videos within the frames themselves. Somewhat awkwardly, Aura comes tethered to a “puck” — essentially a phone-shaped mini-computer that powers the experience behind the glasses. When using it, you can ostensibly just slip it into your pocket.

But in exchange for the awkwardness of the puck, the user gets a wider variety of fun experiences with the glasses, including an immersive Google Maps app, VR YouTube videos, and a “painting app” that lets you — via the powers of hand tracking — create holographic imagery that only you can see. There are also reportedly games, playable (again) via hand tracking, and basic web surfing functionality.

“Whether you are following a floating recipe while cooking, setting up a private workspace at a coffee shop or on a flight, or watching a movie on a virtual big screen at home, the experience is seamless,” the company promises.

Xu also says that he imagines the device being used not just by the casual consumer but by professionals as well. “It’s not just about watching the NBA game in a hologram type of format, you could also go to a coffee shop and do some work,” he said.

Currently, the glasses are only available for developers, but the plan is for them to launch commercially later this year. Xreal is also working on an IPO that is expected to take place before 2026 is over, although Xu declined to say much about it.

In the meantime, the company is working on that whole turning-a-profit thing. Xu notes that his company has been raising its gross margin while lowering its costs for marketing and sales. “Next year is the year when we could actually break even,” he says.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Xreal #Googles #smartglasses #partner #thinks #finally #mastered #notoriously #tricky #industry #TechCrunchGoogle,Google I/O,AI,SMART Glasses,XReal

Tech-news , , , ,

The smart glasses industry has long been a tortured dream of Silicon Valley. The premise is appealing enough: What if, to enjoy the benefits of mobile computing, people didn’t have to stare at their phones all day long and could, instead, simply wear a lightweight computing device on their face? Science fiction fans (a demographic that is strong in the tech industry) can see this vision perfectly.

However, the industry has — for much of the last decade — resembled a financial black hole into which gargantuan investments have been sunk and from which little to no profit has ever emerged.

“Everybody’s losing money,” said Chi Xu, the founder and CEO of the smart glasses company Xreal, which is a longtime partner of Google. I met Xu at Google’s I/O conference in Mountain View last week, where he was promoting Xreal’s Project Aura. That’s its latest effort to create a set of functional XR glasses that people actually want to use.

“That’s because it’s very hard, what we’re doing,” he said.

For much of the industry’s existence, the problems of smart glasses have seemed somewhat obvious: bulky, uncomfortable, and socially awkward form factor, paired with negligibly beneficial software. Now, however, industry insiders — including Xu — feel like their business has turned a corner and may be reaching an inflection point.

That supposed inflection point has something to do with Meta, whose 2023 partnership with Ray-Ban launched one of the first lines of models that has actually managed to sell a lot of units. (It’s worth noting, however, that the division responsible for the glasses, Reality Labs, still operates at a massive loss.)

Now, as form factors shrink and software improves, Xu feels that Xreal can finally become a leader in the space. “You need all the key pieces ready — you need the hardware ready, the operating system needs to be ready, and then you need a great user interface,” Xu said.

Xreal’s newest model Aura is wired smart glasses that have OLED displays embedded within them, meaning that you can watch high-resolution videos within the frames themselves. Somewhat awkwardly, Aura comes tethered to a “puck” — essentially a phone-shaped mini-computer that powers the experience behind the glasses. When using it, you can ostensibly just slip it into your pocket.

But in exchange for the awkwardness of the puck, the user gets a wider variety of fun experiences with the glasses, including an immersive Google Maps app, VR YouTube videos, and a “painting app” that lets you — via the powers of hand tracking — create holographic imagery that only you can see. There are also reportedly games, playable (again) via hand tracking, and basic web surfing functionality.

“Whether you are following a floating recipe while cooking, setting up a private workspace at a coffee shop or on a flight, or watching a movie on a virtual big screen at home, the experience is seamless,” the company promises.

Xu also says that he imagines the device being used not just by the casual consumer but by professionals as well. “It’s not just about watching the NBA game in a hologram type of format, you could also go to a coffee shop and do some work,” he said.

Currently, the glasses are only available for developers, but the plan is for them to launch commercially later this year. Xreal is also working on an IPO that is expected to take place before 2026 is over, although Xu declined to say much about it.

In the meantime, the company is working on that whole turning-a-profit thing. Xu notes that his company has been raising its gross margin while lowering its costs for marketing and sales. “Next year is the year when we could actually break even,” he says.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link
#Xreal #Googles #smartglasses #partner #thinks #finally #mastered #notoriously #tricky #industry #TechCrunch

Tag

Related Posts

Microsoft is in a unique position as AI overtakes the tech industry. It’s one of the world’s largest cloud providers and software-as-a-service companies, while also holding valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic.

Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with $90 billion in revenue and net income of $35.8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported $331.8 billion in revenue with a net income of $133.7 billion for the year.

And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash.

Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer.

Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor.

Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs.

In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth.

When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging.

“The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.”

Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today.

And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings.

“If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.”

The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face, all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit.

Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives.

“Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said.

He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.”

As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said.

Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Microsoft #openly #competing #OpenAI #Anthropic #TechCrunchMicrosoft">Microsoft is openly competing with OpenAI, Anthropic more than ever | TechCrunch Microsoft is in a unique position as AI overtakes the tech industry. It’s one of the world’s largest cloud providers and software-as-a-service companies, while also holding valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic. Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with billion in revenue and net income of .8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported 1.8 billion in revenue with a net income of 3.7 billion for the year. And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash. Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer. Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor. Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs. In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth. When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging. “The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.” Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today. And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings. “If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.” The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face, all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit. Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives. “Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said. He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.” As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said. Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them. When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.#Microsoft #openly #competing #OpenAI #Anthropic #TechCrunchMicrosoft

valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic.

Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with $90 billion in revenue and net income of $35.8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported $331.8 billion in revenue with a net income of $133.7 billion for the year.

And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash.

Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer.

Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor.

Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs.

In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth.

When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging.

“The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.”

Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today.

And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings.

“If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.”

The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face, all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit.

Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives.

“Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said.

He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.”

As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said.

Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Microsoft #openly #competing #OpenAI #Anthropic #TechCrunchMicrosoft">Microsoft is openly competing with OpenAI, Anthropic more than ever | TechCrunch

Microsoft is in a unique position as AI overtakes the tech industry. It’s one of the world’s largest cloud providers and software-as-a-service companies, while also holding valuable stakes in the two biggest AI labs, OpenAI and Anthropic.

Those incentives are starting to clash as Microsoft posts blockbuster financial results. The company just reported an extremely profitable quarter with $90 billion in revenue and net income of $35.8 billion. For the fiscal year, which ended June 30, Microsoft reported $331.8 billion in revenue with a net income of $133.7 billion for the year.

And CEO Satya Nadella is not about to let the trajectory of Anthropic and OpenAI — which are expanding into applications and agentic infrastructure that could ultimately let them own customer relationships — derail that kind of cash.

Nadella has been preaching to enterprises to use multiple models and to stop relying on the frontier AI labs for the agentic harness/app layer.

Doing so is dangerous, he’s been saying, because it requires companies to share too many of their internal secrets with model makers of dubious trustworthiness. He knows his customers. Enterprise IT fears both data leaks and being locked into a vendor.

Now he has openly told Wall Street analysts during the company’s quarterly conference call Wednesday that this is an opportunity for Microsoft to sell customers its own homegrown models, alongside agents, AI security and more, while promising lower costs.

In other words, he’s pitching Microsoft as an alternative to many of the upscale services that OpenAI and Anthropic are developing for their own growth.

When UBS analyst Karl Keirstead specifically asked Nadella to weigh in on the open vs. closed-sourced debate roiling the AI industry, and how Microsoft will benefit from it, Nadella came out swinging.

“The goal is to have the firm be in control of their own destiny,” the CEO said of enterprises. “We are very, very clear about the architectural sort of design of the platform, which is you got to keep your harness separate from the model … that means any model at any given time is swappable.”

Microsoft, of course, sells a menu of harnesses (aka AI agents), too, under the Copilot name, including its coding agent GitHub Copilot. Coding agents are where much of the AI dollars are being spent today.

And he used the high-profile incident from last week as proof of his warnings.

“If you look even at the Hugging Face incident, the biggest thing that we should take away from that is you can’t sort of depend on any one model,” Nadella said. “You will maybe need multiple models to even remediate some challenges that get caused by one model. Like that’s the way to think about it, right? Which is you can’t be subject to a refusal of one model.”

The incident involved an unreleased model from OpenAI breaking out of its sandbox and successfully mounting a full-scale hack on Hugging Face, all in pursuit of besting a benchmark. Trying to understand what happened, Hugging Face at first tried to use a private frontier model (which it hasn’t named) that refused to help it. So it turned to the Chinese open-source model Z.ai GLM 5.2 to analyze logs and defend its infrastructure. The incident has so shocked the industry that even Sam Altman is now saying that maybe AI development should slow down a bit.

Nadella also made clear that Microsoft is happily selling its own homegrown models, the MAI family, on its own homegrown AI chips, Maya, and pitching them as cheaper alternatives.

“Every customer wants the right model for each task based on quality, latency, cost, and compliance. We offer the broadest model catalog in the cloud with over 11,000 models, including the leads from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, xAI, as well as our own MAI family,” he said.

He added: “We’re also accelerating our own model development. We announced more than a dozen new models across image, voice, transcription, coding, security, including our first reasoning model, MAI thinking one, all with cost-efficient inference at the core for the enterprise use cases. We are co-designing these models with our silicon, and we are seeing 40% better performance per watt when running MAI models on Maya 200.”

As for Mythos? Nadella pointed to Microsoft’s new Mythos competitor announced earlier this week, MAI Cyber One Flash. It “achieves better performance than the much larger Mythos model, but at half the cost when combined with our multi-agent security harness,” he said.

Sure, the Microsoft CEO says that enterprises should use the frontier models that OpenAI and Anthropic offer in their mix. But his bigger message is: don’t trust them enough to rely on them.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

#Microsoft #openly #competing #OpenAI #Anthropic #TechCrunchMicrosoft
Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs

Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules.

Platform Comparison at a Glance

PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited For
SkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced traders
CS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectors
Tradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent traders
Swap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users

Which Type of Trader Are You?

Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You? Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading. Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules. Platform Comparison at a Glance PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited ForSkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced tradersCS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectorsTradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent tradersSwap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users Which Type of Trader Are You? Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all. SkinsMonkey SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you. CS.MONEY CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot. Tradeit.gg Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble. Swap.gg Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started. Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal. Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way. Conclusion The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins. #Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all.

SkinsMonkey

SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you.

CS.MONEY

CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot.

Tradeit.gg

Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble.

Swap.gg

Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started.

Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform

Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal.

Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice

Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way.

Conclusion

The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins.

#Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms">Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You? Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading. Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules. Platform Comparison at a Glance PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited ForSkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced tradersCS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectorsTradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent tradersSwap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users Which Type of Trader Are You? Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all. SkinsMonkey SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you. CS.MONEY CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot. Tradeit.gg Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble. Swap.gg Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started. Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal. Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way. Conclusion The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins. #Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules.

Platform Comparison at a Glance

PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited For
SkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced traders
CS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectors
Tradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent traders
Swap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users

Which Type of Trader Are You?

Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You? Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading. Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules. Platform Comparison at a Glance PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited ForSkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced tradersCS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectorsTradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent tradersSwap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users Which Type of Trader Are You? Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all. SkinsMonkey SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you. CS.MONEY CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot. Tradeit.gg Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble. Swap.gg Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started. Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal. Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way. Conclusion The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins. #Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all.

SkinsMonkey

SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you.

CS.MONEY

CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot.

Tradeit.gg

Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble.

Swap.gg

Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started.

Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform

Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal.

Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice

Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way.

Conclusion

The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins.

#Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms">Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You?

Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading.

Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs

Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules.

Platform Comparison at a Glance

PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited For
SkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced traders
CS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectors
Tradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent traders
Swap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users

Which Type of Trader Are You?

Comparing the Top Skin Trading Platforms: Which One Is Right for You? Every CS2 player has their own trade goals. Some people want to get better skins, while others want a quick and easy swap. There are a lot of trading sites out there, so picking the best one can be hard. It is good to look at how a platform does in the things that matter, like flexibility, user experience, and who it helps the most. This guide talks about four top platforms. It will help you see which fits your way of trading. Start by Understanding Your Trading Needs Before you trade CS2 skins, you need to think about what is most important to you. Do you want quick swaps, many different skins to pick from, an easy way to trade, or steady swap values? Knowing what you want makes it easier to choose the right platform. This is better than picking something just because a lot of people use it. SkinsMonkey lets you trade, buy, and sell using an automated trading system for Steam accounts that meet the right rules. Platform Comparison at a Glance PlatformBest StrengthTrading FlexibilityLearning CurveBest Suited ForSkinsMonkeyBalanced all-around experienceExcellentEasyBeginners & experienced tradersCS.MONEYExtensive marketplaceVery GoodModerateCollectorsTradeit.ggQuick exchangesGoodEasyFrequent tradersSwap.ggSimple trading processGoodEasyCasual users Which Type of Trader Are You? Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all. SkinsMonkey SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you. CS.MONEY CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot. Tradeit.gg Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble. Swap.gg Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started. Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal. Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way. Conclusion The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins. #Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

Your trading habits can change which platform feels right for you. People who update the stuff they have need sites with easy navigation and smooth trading. Those new to trading may like a site that makes everything simple. Collectors want to use sites that let them check out several skins without trouble. Picking a platform that fits your skill level makes trading feel more good for all.

SkinsMonkey

SkinsMonkey gives you a good way to trade. The workflow is easy to use. You get many exchange choices. It works well for people who need a platform that is reliable. The site does not make things hard for you.

CS.MONEY

CS.MONEY is good for people who like to see many skins before they choose one. It gives a marketplace feel that fits both collectors and people who trade a lot.

Tradeit.gg

Tradeit.gg is made for people who want fast and easy skin exchanges. Its simple setup helps you finish trades quickly and without trouble.

Swap.gg

Swap.gg gives users an easy way to trade skins, even if they do it now and then. The site has a clean look, so you can find what you want fast. It is simple to use and does not take much time to get started.

Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Platform

Instead of picking the first trading site you see, take some time and ask yourself some useful questions. Does the platform make the trading process easy to understand? Is there help from customer support when you need it? Can you compare your trading options without any trouble? If you answer these questions, you will find a platform that fits the way you want to trade in the long run, not just for your next deal.

Why SkinsMonkey Is a Strong All-Round Choice

Every platform comes with its own good points, but SkinsMonkey is different because it does well in many things, not just one. It has an easy-to-use look, many ways to trade, and a fast exchange process. This makes it right for both new and experienced traders. With this balanced style, you can feel good about trading and have a smooth time every step of the way.

Conclusion

The best platform to use will be based on how you like to trade, what you want, and what you hope to get out of it. If you want to trade cs2 skins, you should look at how each site works, how easy it is to use, and what you get from it. This can help you make a good pick. From the choices we talked about, SkinsMonkey gives a good all-around option for people who want a safe and smooth way to trade skins.

#Comparing #Top #Skin #Trading #Platforms

In the past decade, we’ve had three Venom films, six Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown.

And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms.

“It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip.

Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen?

Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then.

Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so.

Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course.

Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom">Spider-Man’s Producers Still Aren’t Ruling Out a Venom Crossover In the past decade, we’ve had three Venom films, six Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown. And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms. “It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip. Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen? Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then. Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so. Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course. Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. #SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom

Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown.

And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms.

“It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip.

Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen?

Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then.

Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so.

Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course.

Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom">Spider-Man’s Producers Still Aren’t Ruling Out a Venom CrossoverSpider-Man’s Producers Still Aren’t Ruling Out a Venom Crossover In the past decade, we’ve had three Venom films, six Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown. And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms. “It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip. Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen? Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then. Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so. Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course. Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. #SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom

In the past decade, we’ve had three Venom films, six Spider-Man films, and zero instances of the two meeting. Oh, sure. Tom Hardy’s Eddie Brock briefly spoke about Spider-Man at one point. And, way back in another multiverse, Tobey Maguire’s webslinger faced off against the symbiote. But in the current theatrical life cycle of both characters, in both live action and animation, the arch-enemies have yet to showdown.

And while we assume that wait continues with Spider-Man: Brand New Day (no spoilers here), some of the people responsible don’t want fans to give up hope. Speaking to Happy Sad Confused, Spider-Man: Brand New Day producers Amy Pascal and Kevin Feige talked about a potential meet-up between the Toms.

“It would be great, let’s put it that way,” Pascal said. Feige then added, “Always have hope,” before Pascal tagged on, “I have hope. We have hope.” Of course, that’s a whole lot of nothing. But what it isn’t is a “No.” Here’s the quote as part of a longer clip.

Okay, so assuming that team-up doesn’t happen in Brand New Day (nothing in the marketing has indicated it could, but we wouldn’t want to completely rule it out), when could it happen?

Pascal did confirm the recent news of a Venom animated movie being in the works. So, maybe we see it happen in animation. Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is also in the works, and it’s been well-established in that world that every Spider-Man or Spider-Man-adjacent movie is part of an infinite Spider-Verse. Maybe it happens then.

Live action gets a little murkier, though. The general assumption is Holland’s Spider-Man will be seen after Brand New Day in 2027’s Avengers: Secret Wars. And that film is, again, rumored to feature all manner of cameos: Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man, etc. Surely Venom, an alien by origin, could feature in that in some way. But we don’t think so.

Honestly, the most likely place for this crossover would be a future Spider-Man film and, of course, none of those have been written yet. So “hope” is basically all there is. However, we can all but guarantee Brand New Day is going to be a massive financial success and force Sony to continue making Spider-Man movies. Venom seems like a perfect place for the story to go next. After Secret Wars, of course.

Do you think Tom Holland’s Spider-Man will ever fight Venom? And, if so, will it be Tom Hardy? Let us know below. And, if you are really craving that crossover, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 video game does a hell of a job of it.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

#SpiderMans #Producers #Arent #Ruling #Venom #CrossoverAmy Pascal,Kevin Feige,Spider-Man,Venom

Post Comment